Skip to main content

Evaluations of the curative efficacy of G. fruticosus solvent extracts in experimentally induced nephrolithiatic Wistar male rats



In Ethiopian folk medicine, there is a claim that medicinal plants can treat urolithiasis although there is insufficient scientific evidence. The objective of this study was to evaluate the curative efficacy of Gomphocarpus fruticosus extracts in experimentally induced nephrolithiatic rats.


Urolithiasis was induced in male Wistar rats by feeding ethylene glycol in drinking water for 28 days. The curative effects were evaluated after oral administrations of 200 mg/kg of the extracts from 15 to 28 days. Urine samples were collected 1 day before sacrificing the rats. Blood, liver and kidney samples were gathered under anaesthetic condition at day 28. Crystals in the urine were also analyzed by light microscopy.


G. fruticosus EtOAc extract reduced significantly the level of sodium (P < 0.001), whereas it was significantly elevated the levels of magnesium and citrate (P < 0.01) compared to lithiatic control. G. fruticosus BuOH extract lowered the levels of potassium (P < 0.01), calcium and phosphate in urolithiatic rats. It was also observed that G. fruticosus EtOAc extract decreased the level of oxalate in the urine (P < 0.001), whereas it was increased the levels of magnesium (P < 0.05) and citrate (P < 0.01) in serum analysis after exposure to BuOH extract. In the kidneys, CaOx crystal deposits were reduced significantly by G. fruticosus EtOAc extract (P < 0.01).


It has been noted that G. fruticosus EtOAc extract was potent in treating urolithiasis. However, further study is required to assess the efficacy of the active compounds against urolithiasis.

Peer Review reports


Urolithiasis (stones in the urinary tract) affects about 12% of the world population at some stage in their lifetime [1]. Other studies reported that the worldwide prevalence of kidney stone ranges between 2 to 20% [2, 3]. Urolithiasis affects all ages, sexes and races [4, 5], but it occurs more frequently in men than in women within the age 20 to 49 years [6]. The pathogenesis of kidney stones remain incompletely understood [7] and its treatment remains a challenge, although there are modern treatment modalities including ESWL [8]. The sequence of events that trigger stone formation includes nucleation, growth, aggregation, and retention of crystals within the kidneys [9, 10].

Renal stone formation requires persistent retention of crystals in the kidneys after the completion of the crystallization process [11, 12]. The interaction of COM crystals with a surface of renal epithelial cells is a critical initiating event in nephrolithiasis [13]. Crystal-cell interactions result in the movement of the crystals from the basolateral side of the cells to the basement membrane [14]. A study on animal models also revealed that the administration of high concentrations of CaOx crystals or oxalate ions appears to be toxic, causing renal tubular cell damage [7]. Exposure to higher levels of oxalate or CaOx crystals induce epithelial cell injury, which is a predisposing factor for the subsequent stone formation [15, 16].

An imbalance between urinary stone inhibitors and promoters has been suggested to be the cause of stone formation [17]. Promoters facilitate stone formation [18], but inhibitors decrease the initiation of supersaturation, nucleation, crystal growth and rate of aggregation [17]. However, inhibitors do work equally for everyone; therefore, some people form stones; while others do not [19]. Among recurrent stone formers, urinary oxalate excretion was higher, whereas citrate excretion was lower A study also indicated that oxalate can facilitate chloride, sodium and water re-absorption in the proximal tubules and activate multiple signaling pathways in renal epithelial cells [20].

Despite considerable improvements in medical therapy such as the utility of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), there is no satisfactory drug to treat renal calculi [21]. ESWL treatment is associated with acute renal injury due to the traumatic effect of the Shock wave, and infections after treatment [22]. It is also results in incomplete stone clearance, and unable to avoid new stone formations [23], or stone recurrences often up to 60% [24, 25]. After the first episode of a stone, the recurrence rate is more than 50% within 10-years [26, 27]. Therefore, kidney stone recurrence is a major risk, which is considered as the un-met clinical challenge in the area of urology [28]. Stone forming patients are prone to its recurrences after the first surgical therapy [29]. Even though the chemical compositions of a stone influence the choice of intervention [30], open surgery remain as the mainstay of treatment [31]. Some medicinal plants studied so far against urolithiasis are indicated in Table 1.

Table 1 Medicinal plants possessing anti-urolithiatic effects in previous studies

In Ethiopia, most patients rely on traditional medicinal plants as an alternative therapy for various diseases including urolithiasis. Medicinal plants are affordable, accessible, effective, with less side effects and being better compatible with the human body [41], compared to conventional drugs [42]. In the present study, G. fruticosus (L.) Ait.f were selected to examine their effects on experimentally induced urolithiasis. A thorough literature survey was carried out to ascertain that none of the selected medicinal plant parts have been studied so far on anti-urolithiatic activities. To date, there is also insufficiency of scientific evidence reported on the antiurolithiatic activity of this medicinal plant. Therefore, the objective of the study was to evaluate the curative efficacy of medicinal plants in experimentally induced nephrolithiatic male rats.

Materials and methods

Medicinal plant material identification and collection

Gomphocarpus fruticosus leaves were collected during its flowering or fruiting times. The G. fruticosus (L.) Ait.f, known as Tifriena (local name), was collected at Bole Bulbula around “93 Mazoria” Addis Ababa during October 2018. G. fruticosus L.Ait.f (Asclepiadaceae) (reported by key informant) was claimed for urolithiasis treatment. The plant specimens were submitted to the National Herbarium, Department of Plant Biology and Biodiversity Management, Addis Ababa University (AAU) for taxonomic authentication (TA238) and the corresponding collection number was given. The specimens were deposited in the National Herbarium of AAU for future references.

Preparation of the crude extract

The plant materials were cleaned thoroughly with tap water to remove contaminants, and dried in shed at room temperature from 2 to 3 weeks in the Biomedical Sciences laboratory, AAU. The dried plant parts were finely powdered using a kitchen grinder (mortar and pestle, sized about 9 in. in diameter). The powders were put through a sieve of 3 mesh sizes so as to filter a gross solid matter.

The extracts were prepared using a procedure similar to that often used by traditional healer’s or patients, with some minor modifications. The plant powders were soaked in distilled water, which was placed on a shaker for 72 h. The mixture was filtered through cotton/gauze, then through Whatman filter paper number 1 (pore size: 11 μm) to remove fine solid plant particles or insoluble constituents. The entire extracts were concentrated to dryness using lyophilizer machine by removing of distilled water under reduced pressure. Then, the semi-solid concentrates poured into a glass petri-plates and allowed to completely dry in water bath adjusted to 45 °C. The final dried extracts were collected and stored in labeled sterile bottles covered with tightly stopper and kept in freezer on -20 °C until used in the experiments.

Preparations of successive solvent extractions

Gomphocarpus fruticosus mother extract (aqueous) was partitioned with solvents of increasing polarity from non-polar to polar solvents ensuring that a wider polarity range of compounds could be extracted. Successive extraction was sequentially started with petroleum ether, followed by chloroform, ethyl acetate, butanol and water, in which these solvents were removed and concentrated under rotary vacuum evaporator. The plant materials macerated in distilled water were lyophilized under the freeze dryer to obtain the powdered residues. The dried extracts were capped tightly with stoppered and stored in glass bottles, and kept in a refrigerator at -20 °C until used for the experiment.

Chemicals and reagents/standard drugs

The chemicals and reagents or kits used were analytical grade purchased from various sources. The procurement of petroleum ether, chloroform, ethyl acetate, butanol and ethanol were from Wisteam PLC (Addis Ababa, Ethiopia), potassium dihydrogen phosphate (anhydrous), sodium phosphate (dibasic anhydrous extra pure), Tris-HCl buffer (C4H11NO3), and sodium chloride (NaCl) were purchased from the Micron International Trading House PLC (Addis Ababa Ethiopia). Similarly, isoflurane, and formaldehyde were purchased from Neway Chemicals PLC (Addis Ababa, Ethiopia). Ethylene glycol (EG) and ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) were purchased from Pharma PLC (Addis Ababa, Ethiopia). EDTA tubes, serum separator tubes, capillary tubes and surgical blades were purchased from Micro Pharma PLC (Addis Ababa, Ethiopia). Furthermore, kits for liver and kidney function tests were purchased from a Roshi PLC (London, England). The oxalate (oxalic acid) colorimetric assay kits and citrate colorimetric/fluorometric assay kits were purchased from BioVision Incorporated (Milpitas, USA). Potassium citrate powder was obtained from the Black Lion Referral Hospital (Addis Ababa, Ethiopia). Cystone (polyherbal formulation) was purchased from Mumbi, India. Ascorbic acid, which was purchased from Micron International Trading House PLC (Addis Ababa, Ethiopia).

Solubilization of the plant extract and the standard drugs

The test extracts/drugs of different concentrations were dissolved using appropriate vehicles, which were distilled water and 3% Tween 80. All plant extracts and potassium citrate were dissolved in distilled water at different concentrations. The procedure used to dissolve Cystone was similar to the methods of Phatak and Hendre [43] and Garimella et al. [44] with some modifications. Cystone tablets were powdered using a Mortar and Pestle (size: 0.23 m), and dissolved (suspended) in distilled water (900 μl) and 100 μl of 3% Tween 80 (that is, 750 mg/ml). Then, they were kept for 3 h to dissolve, centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min, and filtered through 0.22 mm pore size filter paper. The clear supernatant was collected and used for calcium oxalate nucleation, and aggregation assays. Extracts were collected using Falcon tubes (45 ml), air tighten and stored in the refrigerator until experimental use. The test extracts and standard drugs were prepared daily and shortly prior to testing administrations at dose 200 mg/kg of extracts, 750 mg/kg of Cystone, and 2.5 g/kg of potassium citrate. The test substance dosing volume was 2 ml/100 g of body weight. Deionized water was used to prepare all extracts/drugs and these were prepared daily before testing administrations.

In vivo urolithiatic pharmacological investigations

Target animals

Healthy adult male albino Wistar rats of the same age-group between 8 to 10 weeks and weighing (220-280 g) were used, purchased from the Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI), and breed at the Biomedical Sciences animal laboratory, AAU. The experiment was conducted at the Biomedical Sciences Laboratory of AAU and EPHI, in accordance with internationally accepted standard guidelines for the use of animals in scientific research. Prior to starting the experiment, rats were acclimatized to standard laboratory conditions (6 rats per polypropylene cages) for 7 days. They were kept under a controlled environment of temperature (27 ± 2 °C), relative humidity (55 ± 5%), and light (12 h light/dark cycles). These rats were fed with regular pellets (standard diet) and allowed for free drinking water (ad libitum) for 28 days.

Urolithiasis induction

Kidney stones were induced using ethylene glycol (EG) along with ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) administered in the rats’ drinking water. In this hyperoxaluria model, 1% (w/v) NH4Cl was given with 0.75% (v/v) EG for the first 5 days to accelerate lithiasis, following this the water supply was switched to 0.75% EG alone for the next 25 days [45,46,47]. Exposure of these dose levels were sufficiently tolerable in animal studies [48]. EG administrations result in hyperoxaluria, which in turn leads to CaOx deposition in the kidneys [49]. The experimental rats assigned as stone curative groups were receiving stone inducing treatment for 28 days.

Curative effects of urolithiasis

In the curative treatment (dissolution), a total of 54 albino Wistar male rats were divided randomly into 9 groups comprising 6 individuals per group with matching body weights. In curative treatment, the disease was induced priory from day 1 to 14. Then, each of the extracts/drugs was administered orally from day 15 to 28 concurrently with disease induction (EG) protocols to determine curative effects [50, 51]. At the end of 28th days, rats were sacrificed for biochemical and histopathological studies. The experimental design were assigned as Group I (Normal control), Group II (Lithiatic control), Group III (K-Cit), Group IV (Cystone), Group V (G. fruticosus PET extract), Group VI (G. fruticosus Chl. extract), Group VII (G. fruticosus EtOAc extract), Group VIII (G. fruticosus BuOH extract), and Group IX (G. fruticosus aq. fraction). Other investigators were also used potassium citrate (2.5 g/kg) as a positive control [52, 53]. The dosing volume was 2 ml/100 g of body weight. The control group received distilled water once daily throughout the experiment. At the end of 28th days, rats were sacrificed for biochemical and histopathological studies.

Urine collection and microscopic analysis

Urine, serum and histological profiles are indicators of stone formation as well as recurrences. The abundance and morphology of calcium oxalate crystals formed under in vivo stone inductions were examined using a light microscope (Wagtech Thatcham Berkshire RG194QD, United Kingdom, 40x magnification).

Rats were placed in separate metabolic cages and subjected to 24 h urine collection at day 28th for curative test [50]. In crystalluria analysis, about 3 ml of the fresh urine samples collected were put in a glass tube and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min to remove debris, and supernatants were discarded. These urine sediments were used to determine CaOx crystal formation. About 10 μl of the vortexed sediments were placed onto a microscope glass slide (covered with a cover slip), and examined for CaOx crystals considering its number and size under a light microscope (40x). The crystals formed from chemicals in the urine were carefully examined from other urine artifacts. The photographs of microscopic observations were taken using a digital Camera (Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W180 10.1MP with 3x optical zoom, New Jersey, USA) manually mounted on top of it.

Urine biochemical analysis

At the end of the respective treatment periods, the animals were individually housed in metabolic cages, and 24 h urine (acidified and non-acidified) samples were collected. Urine was acidified with 1 ml of 6 N HCL (hydrochloric acid) and stored at 4 °C for 5 days. Then, these were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min (REMI, R24), and the supernatant of acidified urine were used to estimate excretions such as oxalate, calcium, magnesium and phosphate contents. In non-acidified urine sample contents such as citrate, creatinine and uric acid, and total protein concentrations were analyzed using commercially available diagnostic kits by the Automated clinical chemistry analyzer. Both oxalate and citrate concentrations were analyzed using multi-well spectrophotometer (ELISA reader) as per the manual provided with kits. For the purpose of quantifying, a calibration curve was prepared using Oxalate and Citrate kits as standard.

Serum collection and analysis

After the end of the experimental period (day 28th), rats were anesthetized using Isoflurane and 3 ml blood samples were collected from the retro-orbital vein by capillary puncturing. Serum was separated after centrifuged at 3000 rpm, 20 °C for 15 min. The collected serum was investigated for biochemical parameters like creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, uric acid, urea, calcium, magnesium, and phosphate by Clinical Chemistry Auto-analyzer (Cobas 6000 analyzer, Germany) with the respective diagnostic kits. The oxalate and citrate concentrations were determined using multi-well spectrophotometer (ELISA reader) as per the manual provided with kits. For the purpose of quantifying, a calibration curve was prepared using Oxalate and Citrate kits as standard.

Kidney homogenate analysis

At the end of the experimental period (day 28th), rats were sacrificed under Isoflurane anesthesia, followed by cervical dislocation. Then, the abdomen was opened and both kidneys collected from each rat. The isolated kidneys were carefully removed, and cleaned (washed/rinsed) from extraneous tissues with an ice cold physiological saline solution (0.15 M NaCl). The left kidneys from each animal was preserved in 10% buffered neutral formalin and used for histological studies. The right kidneys were sliced into two equal halves using a blade, and one-half dried at 80 °C in a hot air oven. The method used was similar to Ashok et al. [35] with some modifications, in which a fixed weight of 200 mg (29%) of the total kidney’s mean weight (0.67 g) was further heated separately in 10 ml of 1 N hydrochloric acid (1% HCl), which was placed in a boiled water bath of 100 °C for 30 min. Then, it was finely chopped into pieces using a blade, crashed by pestle and mortar, and further homogenized for 10 min using Ultra-Sonicator. The homogenate was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 min, and the supernatant was collected using labeled Cryotubes. Finally, the supernatants were used for estimations of calcium, oxalate and phosphate contents with commercially available biochemical kits (BioVision PLC, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol [54, 55].

Histopathological examinations

Histopathological examinations were done for kidney tissues of the experimental rats. All rats were sacrificed in a humane manner using Isoflurane anesthesia at the end of the 28th day (urolithiasis curative studies). The tissue pieces were taken from kidneys and analyzed for urolithiatic curative potentials of plant extracts. The tissues were fixed by 10% buffered neutral formalin solution, and subsequently embedded in paraffin wax. The sections (5 μm thick) were cut using Rotary Microtome 4060E (Germany), and mounted on glass slides and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin to study the histopathological changes [34]. All fields of the tissue morphology were examined under a light microscope (100x magnification) (Wagtech Thatcham, Berkshire, RG19 4QD, United Kingdom), and the photomicrographs were captured using a digital Camera manually mounted it (Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W180 10.1MP with 3x optical Zoom, New Jersey, USA) for further references.

Calcium oxalate crystal depositions

In the kidneys, crystal depositions were determined using semi-quantitative assays, which is a microscopic scoring method [46, 56]. The microscope filar micrometer (0.1 mm) eyepiece (10x, Wide field of 23.3 mm, Olympus Optics OSM 212422, made in Japan) was used. That is, crystal deposits in the kidney tissues were counted using a light microscope. The severity grades of crystal deposits were assigned as 0 = < 1 crystal (no crystal deposition), 1 = 1–10, 2 = 11–30, 3 = 31–50, 4 = 51–75 and 5= > 75 crystal counts, taking the mean values [46].

In counting CaOx crystal deposits, a sagittal section of each renal specimen was divided into four equal sized regions by two virtual lines, and readings of an average of 4 microscopic fields were reported [57, 58]. A field of 100x was then randomly selected from each region and CaOx deposits were counted. The image of one of the four regions under a light microscope was randomly captured [58] using a digital camera manually mounted on top of the Microscope.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using Graph Pad Prism version 6 Software (Graph Pad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post-hoc Dunnett’s test comparisons were performed when necessary to compare between treated and untreated groups. The data values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Values of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Curative efficacy of G. fruticosus extracts

In the curative (therapeutic) studies, the selected extracts dose was 200 mg/kg body weight of rats, which was one-tenth of the maximum tolerated dose 2000 mg/kg b.w [32]. This was chosen based on prior acute and/or sub-acute toxicity studies revealing its safety up to dose 2000 mg/kg. The induction of kidney stones by the administration of 0.75% EG combined with ammonium chloride (1%) in drinking water was confirmed in Wistar male rats.

Urine (24 h) photomicroscopic analysis

The analysis of urine samples showed variations in crystal density and size. Among the G. fruticosus successive solvent extracts, G. fruticosus EtOAc extracts (Fig. 1k) and G. fruticosus BuOH extracts (Fig. 1l) also reduced crystal numbers and sizes (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Urine photomicrographs of CaOx crystals following Curative treatment at 200 mg/kg extracts dose. The calcium oxalate crystal morphology and number viewed under a light microscope (40x), in morning urine from male Wistar rats a Normal control/vehicle; b Lithiatic control; treatment with c Potassium citrate (K-Cit); d Cystone; i G. fruticosus PET extract; j G. fruticosus Chl. extract; k G. fruticosus EtOAc extract; l G. fruticosus BuOH extract; and m G. fruticosus aqueous fraction

Urine and serum analysis for electrolytes and renal function test

In experimental rats, G. fruticosus EtOAc extract was reduced the level of sodium significantly compared to lithiatic control (P < 0.001). The level of potassium was reduced by G. fruticosus BuOH extract (P < 0.010). Treatment with the aqueous extract of EtOAc and BuOH extracts of G. fruticosus showed significant reductions in urinary protein excretions (P < 0.011) in relation to lithiatic control. Sodium concentration was also reduced very significantly with the treatment of EtOAc extract of G. fruticosus (P < 0.001). Treatment by the extract of G. fruticosus BuOH lowered the level of uric acid compared to lithiatic group (P < 0.050). However, lithogenic induction may cause impairments of renal function as evidenced by raising the levels of creatinine, proteins and uric acids. In the serum analysis, the level of potassium reduced by G. fruticosus EtOAc extract in comparison to lithiatic control (P < 0.010). It was also found that the effects of G. fruticosus BuOH extract on the level of chloride was close to the normal control. The level of creatinine raised by G. fruticosus crude extract and PET extract (P < 0.01) compared to the normal control (Table 2).

Table 2 Urinary (24 h) excretions and serum analysis of kidney stone-forming electrolytes and kidney function markers in experimental male Wistar rats treated with selected plant extracts at 200 mg/kg dose on 28th day post-treatment. The mixed extract = the combination of A. aspera, S. punctata and R. abyssinicus extracts (1:1:1 ratio), Aqueous (aq.), Ethyl acetate (EtOAc), Butanol (BuOH), Chloroform (Chl), and Petroleum ether (PET). The data were presented the mean ± SD for 6 rats in each group (n = 6). Comparisons between means were made against Group I (vehicle control) and Group II (lithiatic control). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 indicate significant changes in comparison with Group I (vehicle control), #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 indicate a significant change in comparison with Group II (lithiatic control)

Urine and serum analysis of crystal formation inhibitors and promoters

As indicated in Table 3, the level of magnesium was significantly elevated by supplementation of G. fruticosus EtOAc extract compared to lithiatic control (P < 0.010). Similar to K-Cit, the effects of G. fruticosus EtOAc extract increased the level of citrate significantly (P < 0.010). G. fruticosus BuOH extract lowered the elevated levels of calcium and phosphate significantly in the urine compared to the diseased (lithiatic) control (Group II rats) (P < 0.010). It was also observed that G. fruticosus EtOAc extract decreased the level of oxalate in the urine compared to lithiatic control (P < 0.001). In the serum analysis, the excretions of calcium, oxalate and phosphate were grossly increased in lithiatic induced male Wistar rats. The EtOAc extract of G. fruticosus increased the concentration of magnesium (P < 0.052). The serum level of citrate was increased after exposure to BuOH extract of G. fruticosus (P < 0.011), suggesting similar effects to potassium citrate (P < 0.001). G. fruticosus Chl. extract significantly reduced the citrate level compared to the normal control (P < 0.001) (Table 3).

Table 3 Effects of plant extracts at 200 mg/kg dose on changes in urinary excretion (24 h) and serum crystal inhibitors and promoters in male Wistar rats on the 28th day post-treatment. The mixed extract = the combination of A. aspera, S. punctata and R. abyssinicus extracts (1: 1:1 ratio). The data were presented as mean ± SD for 6 rats in each group (n = 6). Comparisons between means were made against Group I (vehicle control) and Group II (lithiatic control). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01,***p < 0.001 indicate significant changes in comparison with Group-I (vehicle control), #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 indicate significant changes in comparison with Group II (lithiatic control)

The serum level of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increased in the lithiatic control compared to the normal (healthy) control (P < 0.050). G. fruticosus PET extract increased serum AST level significantly (P < 0.001) compared to the healthy control. BuOH extract of G. fruticosus lowered significantly the level of AST similar to K-Cit (P < 0.001) compared to lithiatic control (Table 4).

Table 4 Effects of plant extracts on the serum enzyme activity in relation to kidney stone treatment at 200 mg/kg extract dose on the 28th day post-treatment. The mixed extract = the combination of A. aspera, S. punctata and R. abyssinicus extracts (1:1:1 ratio). Data were presented as mean ± SD for 6 rats in each group (n = 6). Comparisons between means were made against Group I (vehicle control) and Group II (lithiatic control). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01,***p < 0.001 indicate significant changes in comparison with group I (vehicle control), #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 indicate significant changes in comparison with group II (lithiatic control)

Kidney homogenate analysis

The concentrations of calcium, phosphorus and oxalate levels were increased in the lithiatic group (Group II) compared to the normal control (Group I). All treatments showed significant reductions in the level of phosphate (P < 0.050), except treatment with BuOH and Chl. extracts of G. fruticosus. The administration of the aqueous mixed extract and G. fruticosus EtOAc extract reduced the level of oxalate significantly compared to the untreated lithiatic groups (P < 0.011) (Table 5).

Table 5 Effect of plant extracts on kidney homogenate constituents of phosphate, oxalate and calcium following the administrations of curative test on the 28th day at 200 mg/kg dose. The mixed extract = the combination of A. aspera, S. punctata and R. abyssinicus extracts (1: 1:1 ratio). Data were presented as mean ± SD for 6 rats in each group (n = 6). Comparisons between means were made against Group I (vehicle control) and Group II (lithiatic control). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01,***p < 0.001 indicate significant changes in comparison with the group I (vehicle control), #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 indicate significant changes in comparison with group II (lithiatic control)

Evaluations of kidneys against CaOx crystal depositions

Light microscopic examination for CaOx crystals in kidney histologic sections revealed CaOx crystals in the tubular lumen. The size and amount of CaOx deposits decreased among treated groups in comparison with lithiatic controls. The effect of G. fruticosus EtOAc extract (G), and its BuOH fraction (H) reduced the number of crystals compared to lithiatic control (B), but do not reduced for aqueous extracts of G. fruticosus (I) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Representative photomicroscopic (100x) images of kidney sections of test male Wistar rats in plant extracts for anti-CaOx crystal deposition effect (dose of extracts 200 mg/kg). Histopathology of kidney tissues a Normal control/vehicle, b Lithiatic control, treatment with c K-Cit, d Cystone, e G. fruticosus PET extract, f G. fruticosus Chl. extract, g G. fruticosus EtOAc extract, h G. fruticosus BuOH extract, and i G. fruticosus aq. fraction. The mixed extracts (the combination of A. aspera, S. punctata and R. abyssinicus extracts in 1:1:1 ratio). Polymorphic irregular CaOx crystals in the renal tubules (yellow circle/arrows). Images were 5 μm thick paraffin sections with Hematoxylin-Eosin stain

Effects of G. fruticosus extracts on CaOx deposition in the kidneys

The number of crystal deposits was counted from the cortex, medulla and papilla by taking the mean of 4 microscopic fields. In comparison with lithogenic groups, CaOx crystal deposits in the kidneys were reduced significantly by G. fruticosus EtOAc extract (p < 0.010). The number of crystal deposits was counted via a sagittal section or longitudinal plane of each renal tissue specimen divided into 4 equal sized regions (two virtual lines) and taking the mean of all fields (Fig. 3). It has been noted that G. fruticosus EtOAc extract was the most potent agent in treating urolithiasis followed by BuOH extract.

Fig. 3

CaOx crystal deposition scores in the curative study after treatment with various successive extracts of G. fruticosus (dose of extracts:200 mg/kg). Data were expressed as mean ± SD of n = 6 rats per group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 indicates a significant change in comparison with lithiatic control (hyperoxaluric group)


The kidneys filter waste products from the blood and void them into the urine, this is not possible if waste materials do not dissolve completely in the urine, leading to kidney stone formation [59]. The biomineralization processes involve successive physicochemical changes such as super-saturation, nucleation, growth, aggregation and retention within renal tubules [60, 61]. Hyperoxaluria is the main risk factor for kidney stone formation than hypercalciuria [62].

Urinary excretions of oxalate, phosphate, and calcium were increased, while the levels of magnesium and citrate levels reduced in the urine compared to the treated group at dose 200 mg/kg b.w, which were similar to the studies reported by Lemann et al. [63] and Sathish et al. [39]. The increment of mineral constituents in the urine could be due to defective renal tubular re-absorptions. Similarly, electrolytes (sodium, potassium and chloride) are used to screen renal acidosis that facilitate renal stone formations [64]. In curative study, sodium level was reduced significantly by G. fruticosus EtOAc extract (P < 0.001). In contrast, previous studies reported that excessive excretions of sodium and chloride in the urine indicate the diuretic activity of the test extract [65, 66], with increasing urinary output, which inhibit stone developments [67].

Magnesium binds with oxalate ions to form soluble oxalate complexes in the urine, and decreases the oxalate availability, which binds with calcium leading to CaOx formation [68, 69]. Hence, it could be suggested that CaOx stones are most likely to be formed by people who are magnesium deficient. This was supported with the fact that G. fruticosus EtOAc extract elevated the levels of magnesium and citrate (P < 0.010) similar to K-Cit in the curative test. The EtOAc extract of G. fruticosus decreased the levels of oxalate in the urine (P < 0.001) compared to lithiatic control in the curative study. In the curative test, significant (P < 0.011) reductions in urinary levels of calcium and phosphate following G. fruticosus BuOH extract administration indicates the presence of CaOx inhibitory constituents, which interfere with crystal nucleation and aggregations. Moreover, an increase in calcium concentrations is a favoring environment for nucleation, and precipitation of calcium oxalate or calcium phosphate with subsequent crystal growth [32, 39]. Similarly, an increased urinary phosphate and oxalate excretions also provide a favorable environment for the formation of calcium phosphate, in turn, leading to calcium oxalate crystal depositions in the renal tubules [18, 70].

In curative study, G. fruticosus EtOAc extract (P < 0.010) reduced serum levels of potassium. In addition, the effects of G. fruticosus BuOH extract on the level of chloride was found to be close to the normal control during the curative study. The serum level of sodium was significantly reduced by G. fruticosus BuOH extracts (P < 0.050) compared to lithiatic control in the curative study. There was a decrease in serum oxalate excretions by EtOAc and BuOH extracts of G. fruticosus compared to lithiatic control. This might be either due to the inhibitions of oxalate formation, or interference with oxalate metabolism. Similarly, G. fruticosus EtOAc and BuOH extracts (p < 0.050) decreased calcium levels compared to lithiatic control in curative test. The ability of these extracts to alter calcium and oxalate excretions may be due to the disintegration of mucoproteins, which are promoters of crystallization as reported by Doddola et al. [34]. In the present study, the level of citrate in the serum was increased by G. fruticosus BuOH extracts (P < 0.011), suggesting a possible curative effect close to K-Cit treated group (P < 0.001). The presence of tannins and flavonoids can lead to the relaxation of smooth muscles of the urinary tract, which could facilitate the expulsion of kidney stones as studied in rats [54], which were confirmed their presence in the phytochemical analysis of G. fruticosus extracts in the present study.

In the present therapeutic study, it was also evidently proved that the G. fruticosus BuOH extracts lowered AST levels very significantly (P < 0.001), which was close to K-Cit compared to the lithiatic control in the curative studies. This can be attributed to the fact that abnormal levels of liver enzymes, particularly aminotransferases including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) are prognostic features (indicators) of the damages of liver cells, and the cellular integrity of the kidneys [71, 72].

Experimentally induced CaOx crystal deposition in the kidneys is also associated with localized inflammation as evidenced by infltration of monocyte and macrophages to the site [73]. G. fruticosus EtOAc extract (P < 0.051) and its BuOH extract (P < 0.051) treated groups, the severity of CaOx crystal depositions reduced the kidneys compared to lithiatic control, which was similar to a study on the other herbal extract [74]. In curative study, EtOAc extract of G. fruticosus reduced the level of phosphate significantly (P < 0.051) compared to the lithiatic control. Tissue injury could be caused by exposures to phosphate and calcium phosphate crystals, leading to the generation of oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation and depletion of antioxidant enzymes [75]. Consequently, the renal epithelial injury promotes crystal retention, as epithelial injury exposes a variety of crystal adhesion molecules on epithelial surfaces and promotes stone formation [73, 76]. COM accumulates in the kidneys by attaching to tubular cell membranes, followed by internalization by endocytosis, leading into cell death [75]. The precipitation of oxalate as COM in the tubular lumen has been linked with renal toxicity and inflammation, damaging the structures of mitochondria, and inhibiting mitochondrial respiratory functions in proximal tubular cells, alter cellular permeability and leading to renal cell death [77].

A major limitation of the study is the inability to use a polarized light microscope that magnifies and better resolve in vivo crystallizations to differentiate between COM and COD crystals which would have improved data quality. The effects of test extracts on urinary diuretic activities were not assessed. Despite these limitations, the strength of the present study was the use of standard experimental designs and procedures to test the potential efficacy of the traditional medicinal plants used in the study.


The present study has provided some evidences for the traditional use of G. fruticosus extracts in urolithiasis management. In vivo/animal tests confirmed the curative efficacies of G. fruticosus extracts, which were evidenced from biochemical and histopathological findings. The present findings demonstrated the CaOx curative efficacy of G. fruticosus EtOAc extract. Further research is necessary to identify the active compounds responsible for the treatment of urolithiasis.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the article.


  1. 1.

    Chauhan CK, Joshi MJ, Vaidya ADB. Growth inhibition of struvite crystals in the presence of herbal extract Commiphora wightii. J Mater Sci. 2008;20(1):85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Buchholz NP, Abbas F, Afzal M, Khan R, Rizvi I, Talati J. The prevalence of silent kidney stones: an ultrasonographic screening study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2003;53(1):24–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Indridason OS, Birgisson S, Edvardsson VO, Sigvaldason H, Sigfusson N, Palsson R. Epidemiology of kidney stones in Iceland: a population-based study. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2006;40(3):215–20.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Al-Eisa AA, Al-Hunayyan A, Gupta R. Pediatric urolithisis in Kuwait. Int Urol Nephrol. 2002;33(1):3–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG. Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev Urol. 2010;12(2–3):e86–96.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Edvardsson VO, Indridason OS, Haraldsson G, Kjartansson O, Palsson R. Temporal trends in the incidence of kidney stone disease. Kidney Int. 2013;83(1):146–52.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Aggarwal KP, Narula S, Kakkar M, Tandon C. Nephrolithiasis: molecular mechanism of renal stone formation and the critical role played by modulators. BioMed Res Int. 2013;2013:292953 21 pages.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Singh KB, Sailo S. Understanding epidemiology and etiologic factors of urolithiasis: an overview. Sci Vis. 2013;13(4):169–74.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Chhiber N, Sharma M, Kaur T, Singla S. Mineralization in health and mechanism of kidney stone formation. Int J Pharm Sci Invent. 2014;3:25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Cunningham P, Noble H, Al-Modhefer A-K, Walsh I. Kidney stones: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Br J Nurs. 2016;25(20):1112–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lieske JC, Huang E, Toback FG. Regulation of renal epithelial cell affinity for calcium oxalate monohydrate crystals. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2000;278:130–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wiessner JH, Hasegawa AT, Hung LY, Mandel GS, Mandel NS. Mechanisms of calcium oxalate crystal attachment of injured renal collecting duct cells. Kidney Int. 2001;59(2):637–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Verkoelen CF, van der Boom BG, Romijn JC. Identification of hyaluronan as a crystal-binding molecule at the surface of migrating and proliferating MDCK cells. Kidney Int. 2000;58(3):1045–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Courbebaisse M, Prot-Bertoye C, Bertocchio J, Barona S, Maruani G, Briandd S, et al. Nephrolithiasis of adult: from mechanisms of preventive medical treatment. Rev Med Interne. 2017;38(1):44–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Khan S, Thamilselvan S. Nephrolithiasis: a consequence of renal epithelial cell exposure to oxalate and calcium oxalate crystals. Mol Urol. 1999;4:305–12.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Khan SR. Crystal induced inflammation of the kidneys results from human studies, animal models and tissue culture studies. J Clin Exp Nephrol. 2004;8(2):75–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Basavaraj DR, Biyani CS, Browning AJ, Cartledge JJ. The role of urinary kidney stone inhibitors and promoters in the pathogenesis of calcium containing renal stones. EAU-EBU Update Ser. 2007;5(3):126–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ratkalkar VN, Kleinman JG. Mechanisms of stone formation. Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab. 2011;9(3–4):187–97.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Cakıroglu B, Eyyupoglu Hazar AI, Uyanik BS, Nuhoglu B. Metabolic assessment of recurrent and first renal calcium oxalate stone formers. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2016;88(2):101–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Marengo SR, Romani AM. Oxalate in renal stone disease: the terminal metabolite that just won’t go away. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2008;4(7):368–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mikawlrawng K, Kumar S, Vandana R. Current scenario of urolithiasis and the use of medicinal plants as antiurolithiatic agents in Manipur (North East India): a review. Int J Herb Med. 2014;2(1):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Tiwari P, Kumar B, Kaur M, Kaur G, Kaur H. Phytochemical screening and extraction: a review. Int Pharm Sci. 2011;1(1):98–106.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Coe FL, Evan A, Worcester E. Kidney stone disease. J Clin Investig. 2005;115(10):2598–608.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Atmani F, Khan SR. Effects of an extract from Herniaria hirsuta on calcium oxalate crystallization in vitro. BJU Int. 2000;85(6):621–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Yasir F, Waqar MA. Effect of indigenous plant extracts on calcium oxalatecrystallization having a role in urolithiasis. Urol Res. 2011;39(5):345–50.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ljunghall S, Danielson BG. A prospective study of renal stone recurrences. Br J Urol. 1984;56(2):122–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Trinchieri A, Ostini F, Nespoli R, Rovera F, Montanarl E, Zanetti G. A prospective study of recurrence rate and the risk factor for recurrence after a first renal stone. J Urol. 1999;162(1):27–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Sujatha D, Singh K, Vohra M, Kumar KV, Sunitha S. Antilithiatic activity of phlorotannin rich extract of Sarghassum wightii on calcium oxalate urolithiais: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Int Braz J Urol. 2015;41(3):511–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Abraham PA, Smith CL. Medical evaluation and management of calcium nephrolithiasis. Med Clin North Am. 1984;68(2):281–99.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Channa NA, Ghangro AB, Soomro AM, Noorani L. Analysis of kidney stones by FTIR spectroscopy. JLUMHS. 2007;2:66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hounnasso PP, Avakoudjo JDG, Paré AK, Brahima K, Ouattara A, Agounkpé MM, et al. Symptomatic urinary lithiasis: Epidemiology and Management at Urology, Department of University Hospital of Cotonou. J Urol. 2015;5:7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bahuguna Y, Rawat MS, Juyal V, Gupta V. Antilithiatic effect of flowers of Jasminum auriculatum Vahl. Int J Green Pharm. 2009;3(2):155–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Chanchal DK, Niranjan P, Alok S, Kulshreshtha S, Dongray A, Dwivedi S. A brief review of medicinal plant and screening method of antilithiatic activity. Int J Pharmacogn. 2016;3(1):1–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Doddola S, Pasupulati H, Koganti B, Prasad KVSRG. Evaluation of Sesbania grandiflora for Antiurolithiatic and antioxidant properties. J Nat Med. 2008;62(3):300–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ashok P, Coti BC, Vishwanathswamy AHM. Antiurolithiatic and antioxidant activity of Mimuscops elengi on ethylene glycol induced urolithiasis in rats. Indian J Pharmacol. 2010;42(6):380–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kalyan S, Betanabhatla B, Christina AJM, Syama BM. Antilithiatic activity of Hibiscus sabdariffa linn. on ethylene glycol induced lithiasis in rats. Nat Prod Rad. 2009;8(1):43–7.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Karadi RV, Gadge NB, Alagawadi KR, Savadi RV. Effect of Moringa oleifera Lam. root-wood on ethylene glycol induced urolithiasis in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;105:306–11.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Deo R, Jain YSK, Alok S, Mahor A, Bharti JP, Jaiswal M. Herbal plants used in the treatment of urolithiasis. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2011;2(6):1412–20.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Sathish R, Natarajan K, Nikhad MM. Effect of Hygrophila spinosa T. Anders on ethylene glycol induced urolithiasis in rats. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2010;3(4):61–3.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Sikarwar I, Dey YN, Wanjari MM, Sharma A, Gaidhani SN, Jadhav AD. Chenopodium album Linn. leaves prevent ethylene glycol-induced urolithiasis in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2017;195:275–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Bensatal MA, Ouahrani MR. Inhibition of crystallization of calcium oxalate by the extraction of Tamarix gallica L. Urol Res. 2008;36(6):283–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ankur C, Amarchand P, Aadarsh C, Deepa I, Pawar RS, Patil UK. Potential of medicinal plants in kidney, gall and urinary stones. Int J Drug Dev Res. 2010;2(2):431–47.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Phatak RS, Hendre AS. In vitro antiurolithiatic activity of Kalanchoe pinnata extract. Int J Pharmacogn Phytochem Res. 2015;7(2):275–9.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Garimella TS, Jolly CI, Narayanan S. In vitro studies on antilithiatic activity of seeds of Dolichos biflorus Linn. and rhizomes of Bergenia ligulata Wall. Phytother Res. 2001;15(4):351–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Bashir S, Gilani AH, Siddiqui AA, Pervez S, Khan SR, Sarfaraz NJ, et al. Berberis vulgaris root bark extract prevents hyperoxaluria induced urolithiasis in rats. Phytother Res. 2010;24(8):1250–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Khan A, Khan SR, Gilani AH. Studies on the in vitro and in vivo antiurolithic activity of Holarrhena antidysenteric. Urol Res. 2012;40(6):671–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Khan A. In vitro and in vivo models for the study of urolithiasis. Urol J. 2018;85(4):145–9.

  48. 48.

    Hess R, Bartels MJ, Pottenger LH. Ethylene glycol: an estimate of tolerable levels of exposure based on a review of animal and human data. Arch Toxicol. 2004;78(12):671–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Tzou DT, Taguchi K, Chi T, Stoller ML. Animal models of urinary stone disease. Int J Surg. 2016;36(Pt D):596–606.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Baheti DG, Kadam SS. Antiurolithiatic activity of some traditional medicinal plants against calcium oxalate induced urolithiasis in rats. IJPCBS. 2013;3(4):1276–85.

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Vijaya T, Rama Rao NVR, Babu AN, Kumar MS, Nirojini PS, Reddy BS, et al. Antiurolithiatic activity of methanolic extract of dried leaves of Glochidion velutinium using ethylene glycol induced rats. Int J Biol Pharm Res. 2013;4(12):878–84.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Renata C, Fabio V, Angela B, Sergio S. Citrate and mineral metabolism: kidney stones and bone disease. Front Biosci. 2003;8:1084–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Chow K, Dixon J, Gilpin S, Kavanagh JP, Rao PN. Citrate inhibits growth of residual fragments in an in vitro model of calcium oxalate renal stones. Kidney Int. 2004;65(5):1724–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Ghelani H, Chapala M, Jadav P. Diuretic and antiurolithiatic activities of an ethanolic extract of Acorus calamus L. rhizome in experimental animal models. J Tradit Complement Med. 2016;6(4):431–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Sharma I, Khan W, Parveen R, Alam MJ, Ahmad I, Ansari MHR, et al. Antiurolithiasis activity of bioactivity guided fraction of Bergenia ligulata against ethylene glycol induced renal calculi in rat. BioMed Res Int. 2017;2017:1969525 11 pages.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Vanachayangkul P, Chow N, Khan SR, Butterweck V. Prevention of renal crystal deposition by an extract of Ammi visnaga L. and its constituents khellin and visnagin in hyperoxaluric rats. Urol Res. 2011;39(3):189–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Bashir S, Gilani AH. Antiurolithic effect of berberine is mediated through multiple pathways. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011;651(1-3):168–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Tsai C-H, Chen Y-C, Chen L-D, Pan T-C, Ho C-Y, Lai M-T, et al. A traditional Chinese herbal antilithic formula, Wulingsan, effectively prevents the renal deposition of calcium oxalate crystal in ethylene glycol-fed rats. Urol Res. 2008;36(1):17–24.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Bawari S, Sah AN, Tewari D. Antiurolithiatic activity of Daucus carota: an in vitro study. Pharmacog J. 2018;10(5):880–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Akanae W, Tsujihata M, Yoshioka I, Nonomura N, Okuyama A. Orthosiphon grandiflorum has a protective effect in a calcium oxalate stone forming rat model. Urol Res. 2010;38(2):89–96.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Alelign T, Petros B. Kidney stone disease: an update on current concepts. Adv Urol. 2018;2018:3068365 12 pages.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Robertson WG, Peacock M. The course of idiopathic calcium disease: hypercalciuria or hyperoxaluaria? Nephron. 1980;26(3):105–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Lemann JJ, Worcestor EM, Gray WR. Hypercalciuria and stones. Am J Kidney Dis. 1991;27:386–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Ennis JL, Asplin JR. The role of the 24-hour urine collection in the management of nephrolithiasis. Int J Surg. 2016;36:633–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Pawar AT, Gaikwad GD, Metkari KS, Tijore KA, Ghodasara JV, Kuchekar BS. Effect of Terminalia chebula fruit extract on ethylene glycol induced urolithiasis in rats. Biomed Aging Pathol. 2012;2(3):99–103.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Jahan N, Bano H, Makbul SA, Kumar BN, Mushir A. Effects of hydroalcoholic extract of Cyperus rotundus L. rhizome against ethylene glycol and ammonium chloride-induced urolithiasis in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Urol Sci. 2019;30:99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Sasikala V, Radha SR, Vijayakumari B. In vitro evaluation of Rotula aquatica Lour. for antiurolithiatic activity. J Pharm Res. 2013;6(3):378–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Touhami M, Laroubi A, Elhabazi K, Loubna F, Zrara I, Eljahiri Y, et al. Lemon juice has protective activity in a rat urolithiasis model. BMC Urol. 2007;7(1):18.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Divakar K, Pawar AT, Chandrasekhar SB, Dighe SB, Divakar G. Protective effect of the hydro-alcoholic extract of Rubia cordifolia roots against ethylene glycol induced urolithiasis in rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010;48(4):1013–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Siddiqui WA, Shahzad M, Shabbir A, Ahmad A. Evaluation of anti-urolithiatic and diuretic activities of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) using in vivo and in vitro experiments. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;97:1212–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Ghale-Salimi MY, Eidi M, Ghaemi N, Khavari-Nejad RA. Antiurolithiatic effect of the taraxasterol on ethylene glycol induced kidney calculi in male rats. Urolithiasis. 2017;46(5):419–28.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Zhao B, Su B, Zhang H, Liu W, Du Q, Li Y. Antiurolithiatic effect of Ferulic acid on ethylene glycol induced renal calculus in experimental rats. Trop J Pharm Res. 2019;18(1):109–15.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Zhai W, Zheng J, Yao X, Peng B, Liu M, Huang J, et al. Catechin prevents the calcium oxalate monohydrate induced renal calcium crystallization in NRK-52E cells and the ethylene glycol induced renal stone formation in rat. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013;13(1):228.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Ahmed A, Wadud A, Jahan N, Bilal A, Hajera S. Efficacy of Adiantum capillus veneris Linn in chemically induced urolithiasis in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2013;146(1):411–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Mcmartin K. Are calcium oxalate crystals involved in the mechanism of acute renal failure in ethylene glycol poisoning? Clin Toxicol. 2009;47(9):859–69.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Sun X-Y, Xu M, Ouyang J-M. Effect of crystal shape and aggregation of calcium oxalate monohydrate on cellular toxicity in renal epithelial cells. ACS Omega. 2017;2(9):6039–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Cao LC, Jonassen J, Honeyman TW, Cheid C. Oxalate-induced redistribution of phosphatidylserine in renal epithelial cells. Implications for kidney stone disease. Am J Nephrol. 2001;21(1):69–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank Addis Ababa University for financial support and laboratory facilities. The Authors also acknowledge the help of Dr. Adey Feleke for financial assistance during trainings on Spectroscopy. Our gratitude extends to Haji Sheh Ali Adem, who was a key informant of the medicinal plant, and Prof. Zemede Asfaw helped in plant identification. We also appreciate Mr. Solomon Genet in purchasing a drug-cystone from Mumbai, India. Our especial thanks also go to Dr. Abraham Asefa and Dr. Kidist Bobosha, from the Armauer Hansen Research Institute, who helped to access kits purchased from Bio-Vision PLC, USA through AHRI’s procurement office.


Supported by Addis Ababa University.

Author information




TA: conceived the project idea, designed the study protocol, performed the experiment, collected and analyzed data, and wrote the main manuscript text; TST: involved in financial support and manuscript overview; BP: Involved in evaluation of the study protocol, and manuscript editing; and involved in fundraising; AD: contribute in evaluation of the study protocol, and manuscript overview. All authors reviewed the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tilahun Alelign.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Animal experiments were conducted in compliance with internationally accepted standard guidelines for scientific research (OECD, 2001). The study was also carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines. The research protocol was approved by the College of Natural Sciences Institutional Review Board (CNS-IRB) (Approval Minute No. IRB/020/2016), Addis Ababa University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alelign, T., Tessema, T.S., Debella, A. et al. Evaluations of the curative efficacy of G. fruticosus solvent extracts in experimentally induced nephrolithiatic Wistar male rats. BMC Complement Med Ther 21, 145 (2021).

Download citation


  • Efficacy
  • Gomphocarpus fruticosus
  • In vivo
  • Urolithiasis