Skip to main content

Hepatoprotective effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid-enriched fermented Hovenia dulcis extract on ethanol-induced liver injury in mice



Various extracts of Hovenia dulcis have been commonly used in Asia for cases of alcohol-related disorders. Fermentation is reported to enhance the level and biological activities of various bio-constituents of plant extracts. Therefore, this study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of fermented H. dulcis extract (FHDE) on ethanol-induced liver injury in mice.


FHDE was prepared using Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus plantarum. The effects of FHDE on ethanol-induced liver injury were evaluated in C57BL/6 N CrSlc mice. A mixed feed preparation containing the fermented extract with and without ethanol was given to mice for 29 days, according to its group. At the end of the experiment, blood and liver samples were collected from all mice in the group. Plasma biochemical analysis and histopathological investigation were performed to evaluate the impacts of treatment on the biomarkers of hepatic damage and inflammatory changes. Besides, the expression of genes that regulate the activities of enzymes associated with alcohol metabolism, antioxidant activity, and fatty acid oxidation was assessed using a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Moreover, the amino acid contents and the active ingredients of the extract were evaluated before and after fermentation.


Fermentation resulted in a marked increase and decrease in the amount of Gamma-Amino-n-butyric acid (GABA) and glutamic acid, respectively. FHDE enhanced the body weight gain of mice compared to ethanol. Besides, plasma levels of triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein, the activities of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were significantly (P < 0.05) reduced in the FHDE-treated groups relative to the ethanol-treated control. FHDE upregulated the expression of genes associated with enzymes involved in alcohol dehydrogenation (Adh1 and Aldh2), antioxidant activity (SOD and CAT), and fatty acid oxidation (PPAR-α and PGC-1α). However, the expressions of Cytochrome peroxidase Cyp2E1 and genes related to lipogenesis (SREBP-1c, FAS, SCD-1, and ACC) were significantly (P < 0.05) downregulated following treatment with the FHDE. Histopathological investigation demonstrated a slight degree of inflammatory cell infiltration and occasional fatty changes in the FHDE-treated groups.


The GABA-enriched fermented H. dulcis extract prevented ethanol-induced hepatic damage by enhancing the antioxidant defense system, fatty acid oxidation, and reducing lipogenesis.

Peer Review reports


Excessive alcohol intake is one of the major causes of liver injury. It impairs the secretion of very low-density-lipoproteins from hepatocytes and predisposes to fatty liver [1]. Over-consumption of alcohol and subsequent metabolism results in the generation of reactive oxygen species, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and lipid peroxidation that collectively imposes steatosis, which can progress to cirrhosis and liver failure (Fig. 1) [2]. Therefore, agents that interfere with oxidative stress and lipogenesis are essential to avoid the development of alcohol-induced liver injury. Natural products with anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant activities are becoming the target to develop therapeutic agents that can prevent the development of alcohol-induced liver injury [3].

Fig. 1

The figure demonstrates enzymes related to alcohol and lipid metabolism in the liver. Overconsumption of alcohol contributes to hepatic steatosis through activation and suppression of enzymes involved in lipogenesis (highlighted in red arrow) and fatty acid oxidation (highlighted in blue arrow), respectively

Medicinal plants have been used widely in Asia for alcohol-related liver diseases. Nevertheless, none of them fully recovers the liver from its pathological conditions [4]. Hovenia dulcis is among those plants that are commonly used in Korean traditional medicine to relieve alcohol-related illnesses. The plant is proven to contain various metabolites, including, polyphenols, polysaccharides, vitamin C and flavonoids, which are related to immune-stimulatory, anti-lipidemic, anti-inflammatory, anti-adipogenic and anti-oxidant activities [5,6,7]. In China and Korea, various extracts of the plant are available in the market as tablets, powders, liquids or granules. These formulations have been used for the treatment of alcohol-related hepatic disorders and as dietary supplements [4, 8]. In vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated the hepatoprotective [3, 9] and anti-adipogenic [5] activities of the crude extracts of H. duclis. Kim et al. [10] illustrated that H. duclis extracts significantly prevented alcohol-induced acute and chronic liver injury in mice. The extract also reduced the carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced rise in the plasma levels of liver enzymes [10, 11].

Fermentation is reported to enhance the absorption, increase the level and biological activity of various bio-constituents of plant extracts [12, 13]. Despite the advantages of fermentation, only few studies have been conducted on the impacts of fermented extracts on alcohol-induced liver injury in mouse models. A study by Xiang et al. [14] demonstrated the impacts of fermented vinegar from H. dulcis on the antioxidant systems of mice exposed to alcohol. The fermented extract enhanced glutathione (GSH) content, total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activities. However, the study was conducted only on the vinegar from H. dulcis peduncles following a single-step fermentation. Besides, the effects of fermentation on the amino acid contents of the extract and its mechanisms of hepatoprotective effects were not exhaustively identified. In this study, the hepatoprotective effects of FHDE (probiotics based) were assessed in mice that feed on a diet containing ethanol. Further analysis was undertaken to determine the impacts of successive fermentation on the amino acid contents of H. dulcis extract.


Preparation of FHDE

The stem and leaves of H. dulcis were obtained from a certified company (Hambakjae Bio Farm Co., Ltd., Jeju Island, South Korea). The identity of H. dulcis was confirmed by a taxonomist (Dr. ZI-Eum Im) and voucher specimens (Voucher number KU-FST-010) were deposited at the Department of Food Science and Technology, Keimyung University, South Korea. The dried and crushed parts of the stem and leaves of H. dulcis were macerated with water (100 g in 1000 ml of water) for 8 h at 100 °C. A novel functional test product (FHDE) was prepared by co-fermenting 50 ml of the concentrated H. dulcis extract (HDE) with probiotics. Briefly, the extract was mixed with glucose (3%) and monosodium L-glutamic acid (5%), and autoclaved at 121 °C for 15 min. Then, Bacillus subtilis HA (KCCM 10775P) starter culture was inoculated and incubated at 42 °C for 3 days. Then, the product was mixed with skim milk (1%, v/v) and glucose (1.5%, v/v) solution. Lactobacillus plantarum EJ2014 (KCCM 11545P) was inoculated and incubated at 30 °C for 7 days for secondary fermentation. Finally, the fermented product was lyophilized via freeze dryer at − 70 °C for 3 days (Freeze Dryer, Ilshin BioBase Ltd., Ede, Netherlands; Pilot LP20).

Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis

The chemical compounds present in the HDE and FHDE were determined by LC/MS using an Accela UHPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, CA, and USA) coupled with an LTQ-Orbitrap XL hybrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron, Bremen, Germany) via an ESI interface. Samples were separated using waters BEH C18 column (2.1 × 150 mm, 1.7 μm). The mobile phase consisted of distilled water (A) and acetonitrile (B) with 0.1% formic acid. The flow rate was set at 400 μL/min. The elution gradient was adjusted as follows: 5, 70, 100, and 100% acetonitrile for 1, 20, 24, and 27 min, respectively. Then, 1 μL of samples were injected and analysis was made in positive ion mode.

The GC-MS analysis was conducted using an Agilent gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and a 5975 GC-MS selective detector (Agilent Technologies). The column (30 m length × 0.25 mm internal diameter, and 0.25 m film thickness; Agilent J & B DB-5MS) temperature was maintained at 70 °C and 300 °C for 1 and 20 min, respectively. The analysis was conducted for a total of 6 h.

Analysis of GABA content

The amino acid content of the HDE and FHDE was measured using an L-8800 amino acid autoanalyzer (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 0.1 g of the fermented product was mixed with 5% trichloroacetic acid solution. The mixture was filtered through a 0.45-μm cellulose acetate filter paper. Then, the filtrate was diluted with 0.02 N hydrochloric acid. The analysis was conducted with a column packed with Hitachi custom Ion exchange resin (4.6 mm ID’ 60 mm L). The mobile phase was comprised of a buffer, PF (physiological fluid assay buffer) -1, 2, 3, 4, PF-RG (PF-regenerating solution, R-3, and C-1.The temperatures of the column and reactor were set to 50 °C and 135 °C, respectively. While the flow rate and detection wavelength were adjusted at 0.55 ml/min and 570 nm, respectively.

In vivo experimental design

The experiment was carried out on male C57BL/6 N CrSlc mice (19–23 g in weight, 5 weeks old), obtained from Jung-Ang Animal Laboratory (Seoul, Korea). Mice were fed with a modified Lieber- DeCarli liquid diet (DYET# 710027, Dyets. Inc. USA). Mice were kept in the animal room with the temperature maintained at 25 ± 2 °C, humidity of 50–60%, and with a 12 h light/dark cycle. The experiment was conducted according to the international guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals [15]. The total number of mice (n = 40) used in the present study was calculated by G*power program based on effect size (0.5), α-error probability (0.05), Power (1-β error probability) (0.6), and the number of groups (5). After 7-days of adaptation period, mice were arbitrarily divided into five groups, each consisting of eight mice. Treatment groups received 0.1% (FHDE1) and 0.3% (FHDE3) FHDE mixed with the diet containing 3% ethanol. Diet with and without ethanol (3%) was given to the negative (NC) and normal control (NRC) groups, respectively. HDE (0.3%: HDE3) mixed with the diet containing 3% ethanol was given to the positive control (PC) group. Mice were treated for a total of 29 days. Feed intake was monitored every other day. Whereas, body weight was measured once every 3 days. At the end of the experiment, mice were anesthetized by carbon dioxide inhalation following similar methods described by Mechesso et al. [16]. Blood was collected through cardiac puncture and immediately centrifuged at 4000x g for 5 min. Plasma was separated and stored at − 70 °C until use. In addition, half of the liver was preserved in formaldehyde for histopathological analysis and the remaining half was immediately processed for RNA extraction.

Plasma biochemical analysis

The protective effects of FHDE from ethanol-induced liver damage was determined by measuring the activities of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Besides, the plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), triglycerides (TG), and free fatty acid (FFA) were determined by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA and Abcam, Cambridge, UK) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Extraction of total RNA and quantitative real-time PCR analysis

The effects FHDE on the expression of genes that are essential to regulate the activities of enzymes involved in alcohol and lipid metabolism were determined using quantitative real-time PCR (Fig. 2). For this purpose, a total of 50 mg liver tissue was homogenized (IKA T10 basic Homogenizer, Seoul, Korea) and total RNA was extracted using TRIzol (Ambion Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The extracted RNA was diluted 2-fold using DEPC-treated water. The concentration (μg/ml) and purity of RNA were determined using a U-2800 spectrophotometer (Hitachi High Technologies, Japan). Complementary DNA was synthesized from 100 ng of RNA by using SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis SuperMix (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the protocol. Then, a reaction mixture containing12.5 μl of SYBR select master mix for CFX (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), 1 μL (10 pmol) of forward and reverse primers of the target gene, 9.5 μL of DEPC-treated water, and 1 μl of cDNA was subjected to real-time PCR analysis (CFX96 Touch™ Real-Time PCR, Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.). The primers used to detect the expression of target genes and their corresponding annealing temperatures are included in the Additional file 1.

Fig. 2

LC/MS (a) and GC/MS (b) chromatograms of HDE (upper) and FHDE (lower)

Histopathological analysis

Paraffin-embedded liver slices were sectioned (5 μm thick) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin dye. The histological changes were examined under a microscope (DIXI3000, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Based on the severity of lesions, scores were given for the major histopathological changes such as the degrees of hepatic necrosis, inflammation, balloon degeneration, and fatty degeneration according to Yang et al. [17]. Finally, the weighted scores were added and comparisons were made among groups.

Statistical analysis

One-way analysis of variance followed by Duncan’s multiple range tests was conducted using SAS Software, Version 9.4 (SAS Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The results are expressed as the means ± standard error of at least three replicates. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


LC/MS and GC/MS analysis

As shown in Fig. 2, the analysis of the non-fermented extract revealed various peaks with the highest at a retention time of 4.62 min (Fig. 2a and b, upper figures). However, it was disappeared after successive fermentation (Fig. 2a and b, lower figures). GC/MS analysis confirmed that the peak that disappeared upon successive fermentation represents 2-furan-carboxaldehyde.

Effects of fermentation on amino acid content

The impact of fermentation on the amino acid content of HDE are summarized in Table 1. Primary fermentation contributed to the formation of amino acids such as citrulline, histidine, hydroxyproline, hydroxylysine, lysine, methionine, ornithine, and phenylalanine. However, arginine has emerged following secondary fermentation. Although successive fermentations resulted in alteration of the levels in almost all of the tested amino acids, significant changes were recorded in the GABA and glutamic acid content. The amount of GABA was markedly increased from 0.13 mg/ml to 92.24 mg/ml. In contrast, the level of glutamic acid was drastically reduced from 253.5 mg/ml to 2.8 mg/ml.

Table 1 Amino acid contents (mg/ml) of the HDE and FHDE

Effects of treatment on feed intake and body weight

At the end of treatment, the body weight of mice in the normal control group (29.5 ± 0.6 g) was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than the other groups (Table 2). Likewise, treatment of mice with FHDE3 caused a significant (P < 0.05) body weight gain relative to the ethanol-treated mice. However, the differences in the feed intake and liver index (ratio of liver to body weight) were not significant among groups.

Table 2 Effects of FHDE on the mean of body weight, feed intake, and liver pathology score

Plasma biochemical analysis

The impacts of FHDE on plasma biochemical parameters and lipid concentrations are presented in Table 3. A reduction (P < 0.05) in the activities of AST and ALT were detected following treatment with FHDE. Treatment reduced the activities of ALT and AST by 12 and 63%, respectively, compared to the levels in NC. Similarly, the plasma concentrations of LDL, TG, and FFA were significantly (P < 0.05) decreased in FHDE-treated mice. Interestingly, treatment with the fermented extract, especially with FHDE3, markedly reduced the plasma ALT and TG levels relative to the non-fermented extract that was used as a positive control.

Table 3 Effects of FHDE on plasma biochemical parameters and lipid concentrations

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis (qRT-PCR)

The expressions of genes that regulate the activities of enzymes related to alcohol dehydrogenation (Adh and Aldh2) and antioxidant enzyme activity (CAT and SOD1) were significantly upregulated (P < 0.05) in FHDE-treated groups with respect to those in the NC (Fig. 3). Treatment upregulated the gene expressions of Aldh2, CAT, and SOD1 by at least 50%. However, FHDE3 and HDE downregulated the expression of CYP2E1 compared to ethanol. The expression of genes related to fatty acid oxidation such as PPAR-α and PGC-1α were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in mice treated with FHDE3 relative to those treated with ethanol only. In contrast, FHDE significantly (P < 0.05) prevented the ethanol-induced upregulation of genes involved in the regulation of lipogenesis including SREBP-1c, FAS, SCD-1, and ACC (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3

Effects of FHDE on the gene expression of alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh1), aldehyde dehydrogenase (Aldh2), catalase (CAT), cytochrome P4502E1 (CYP2E1), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx1). NRC, normal control group; NC, negative control group administered with the diet containing 3% ethanol; HDE, administered with the diet mixture containing 3% ethanol and 0.3% HDE; FHDE1 and FHDE3, administered with the diet containing 0.1 and 0.3% FHDE, respectively in the diet containing 3% alcohol. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of triplicate experiments. Bars with different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05)

Fig. 4

Gene expressions of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR-α), PPAR-γ coactivator (PGC-1α), carnitine palmitoyl-transferase (CPT-1), sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SERBP-1c), fatty acid synthase (FAS), stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD1), and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC). NRC, normal control group; NC, negative control group administered with a diet containing 3% ethanol; HDE, administered with the diet mixture containing 3% ethanol and 0.3% HDE; FHDE1 and FHDE3, administered with the diet containing 0.1 and 0.3% FHDE, respectively in the diet containing 3% alcohol. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of triplicate experiments. Bars with different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05)

Histopathological analysis and liver pathology score

The effects of treatment on histological changes of liver were evaluated and comparisons were made among groups (Fig. 5). The degree of hepatic lesions was evaluated and mean scores were given to the group, according to the severity of hepatic changes. Liver lobules in the normal control group (NRC) were scored as 1.2, as it showed slight steatosis. Marked infiltration of inflammatory cells, a slight degree of balloon degeneration, and fatty changes were evident in alcohol-treated mice with a mean liver score of 2.2. Except for a slight degree of inflammatory cell infiltration and occasional fatty changes, FHDE prevented most of the ethanol-induced hepatic lesions. The mean liver pathology scores of mice in FHED-treated groups were reduced by 53%, which was comparable to the normal control mice. Interestingly, FHDE was better in preventing the development of hepatic lesions compared to the most commonly used non-fermented product (HDE).

Fig. 5

Effects of the EHDE on (a) histological changes and (b) pathology score of mice liver. NRC, normal control group; NC, negative control group administered with the diet containing 3% ethanol; HDE, administered with the diet mixture containing 3% ethanol and 0.3% HDE; FHDE1 and FHDE3, administered with the diet containing 0.1 and 0.3% FHDE, respectively in the diet containing 3% alcohol


In the current study, we attempted to evaluate the hepatoprotective effects of FHDE against ethanol-induced liver injury and its underlying mechanisms in mice. Probiotic fermentation removed 2-furan-carboxaldehyde from HDE. This compound is reported to be carcinogenic and irritant with an LD50 of 65 mg/kg in rats [18]. In addition, fermentation caused an alteration in the levels of most of the tested amino acids with a marked increase and decrease in the amount of GABA and glutamic acid, respectively.

Although GABA is an inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS), the signaling mechanisms are also detected outside the CNS, such as endocrine cells of the pancreas [19], hepatocytes [20], and intestinal epithelial cells [21]. Norikura et al. [22] revealed the in vitro protective effects of GABA against ethanol-induced hepatotoxicity. A more recent study by Wang et al. [23] confirmed that pre-treatment of mice with GABA or muscimol (GABA receptor agonist) ameliorated the liver function and protected the liver from ethanol-induced toxicity through inhibition of the IRE1α- ASK1- JNKpro- apoptotic pathway. On the contrary, pretreatment with bicuculline (GABA receptor antagonist) caused deterioration of the liver function.

Chronic exposure of rats to alcohol is indicated to enhance the activity of glutamate dehydrogenase. Glutamate dehydrogenase dependent oxidation of glutamic acid results in an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) through the generation of excess superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide from liver mitochondria. In addition to these characteristic features of alcohol intoxication, the damage will be further intensified as a result of the reduction in the level of mitochondrial catalase [24]. Therefore, fermentation-induced changes in the level of GABA and glutamic acid could contribute to the protective effects of FHDE from ethanol-induced hepatic damage.

Excessive alcohol intake has shown to induce dysbiosis and damage the intestinal mucosa. The damage might also be exacerbated by a further synthesis of alcohol and endotoxins by the intestinal bacteria. Finally, bacterial products translocate to the liver via the portal vein and induce liver damage [25,26,27]. GABA synergizes other mediators that regulate the intestinal immunity and provide a basis for clinical applications of nerve-induced immunity in the intestine [28, 29]. Previous studies have shown that intestinal inflammation or intestinal bacterial imbalance is closely related to alcohol-related liver injury [30, 31]. Therefore, the GABA enriched FHDE could reduce ethanol-induced liver injury by enhancing local immunity in the intestine.

FHDE treated mice gained more body weight compared to the ethanol-treated mice. The excess amount of monosaccharides present in the HDE might contribute to the significant body weight gain of FHDE-treated mice [3]. Besides, the activities of biomarkers of hepatic damage such as AST and ALT were markedly increased following ethanol intake but it was significantly reduced by both HDE and FHDE treatment. Chronic alcohol intake is known to cause alteration of hepatocyte function and necrosis of hepatocytes which results in elevated plasma AST and ALT levels [32]. Moreover, histopathological evaluation confirmed the preventive effects of FHDE from ethanol-induced inflammatory cell infiltration, fatty changes, and vacuolization suggesting its hepatoprotective effects.

Several enzymes such as alcohol dehydrogenase, aldehyde dehydrogenase, and Cytochrome peroxidase CYP2E1 contribute to the metabolism of alcohol and subsequent removal of its metabolic products from the body. FHDE treatment upregulated the expression of genes such as Adh1 and Aldh, which are essential in the regulation of the activities of alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase, respectively. Chronic alcohol intake suppresses the activity of alcohol dehydrogenase metabolic pathway and subsequently, CYP2E1 dominates the metabolic process. Unlike alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase, metabolism of alcohol via CYP2E1 produces metabolites that are toxic to hepatocytes such as superoxide anion and hydroxyl radicals [33, 34]. In this study, treatment with HDE and FHDE3 significantly reduced (P < 0.05) the expression of CYP2E1 gene. Therefore, FHDE could prevent ethanol-induced liver damage by enhancing the alcohol dehydrogenase metabolic pathway.

In alcoholic liver disease, excessive production of free radicals that emanates from the metabolism of alcohol and lipids result in oxidative stress [33]. The free radicals accumulate and interact with polyunsaturated fatty acids in the bio-membrane, which then results in lipid peroxidation and membrane damage. The problem is more pronounced in mice lacking antioxidant enzymes such as catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione peroxidase [35]. In this study, the expression of CAT that regulates the activities of catalase was markedly up-regulated in the FHDE-treated mice compared to mice treated with ethanol, only. While the expressions of SOD1 and GPx1 genes that regulate the activities of superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase, respectively were not affected by FHED-treatment. Interestingly, the expressions of CAT, SOD1, and GPx1 were up-regulated in the HDE-treated mice with respect to the ethanol-treated mice. Therefore, the antioxidant potential of FHDE might also protect mice from ethanol-induced oxidative damage by enhancing the activities of antioxidant enzymes.

PCR assay demonstrated that the FHDE significantly (P < 0.05) downregulated the expressions of sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP-1C), fatty acid synthase (FAS), stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD), and (acetyl-CoA carboxylase) ACC genes compared to the effects of ethanol. In contrast, the expressions of Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-α) and PPAR-γ-coactivator (PGC-1α) genes reduced significantly. Excessive accumulation of metabolic end-products of alcohol interferes with Adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK), PPAR-α, and CPT-1 which are essential regulators of some of the enzymes involved in fatty acid oxidization in the liver [1, 34, 36]. A study by Chaung et al. [37] demonstrated that ethanol suppresses PGC-1α that causes liver injury through inhibition of the expressions of ROS-scavenging enzymes. Previous studies also confirmed that AMPK dependent down-regulation of SREBP-1c reduces the expression of ACC and FAS. Subsequently, lipogenesis and fatty acid oxidation become inhibited and enhanced, respectively [38, 39]. Besides, SCD-1 is known to play a critical role in lipid-mediated signaling and the formation of hepatic steatosis [40]. Supporting the above findings, plasma biochemical analysis confirmed marked reduction of LDL-C, FFA, and TG levels, suggesting the protective effects of FHDE from the development of fatty liver mainly through its hypolipidemic effect. In agreement with this study, Kim et al. [6] reported the ameliorative effects of HDE on oleic acid-induced steatosis through activation of AMPK and CPT-1 pathway. Therefore, FHED might prevent mice from the development of steatosis by up-regulating and down-regulating the expression of genes, which are essential in fatty acids oxidation and lipogenesis, respectively.


H. dulcis is well known for its protective effect from alcohol-related liver injury. The current study demonstrated the presence of 2-furan-carboxaldehyde, a toxic metabolite, in the crude HDE. Successive fermentation with probiotics abolished the toxic metabolite and ameliorated the GABA content of the extract. Interestingly, FHDE protected the liver from ethanol-induced damage mainly by enhancing alcohol dehydrogenation, suppressing lipogenesis, and preventing oxidative damage in mice.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.



Acetyl-CoA carboxylase


Alcohol dehydrogenase


Aldehyde dehydrogenase


Alanine aminotransferase


Aspartate aminotransferase




Carnitine palmitoyltransferase

CYP2E1 :

Cytochrome P4502E1


Fatty acid synthase


Free fatty acid


Fermented H. dulcis


Gamma-Amino-n-butyric acid


Glutathione peroxidase


H. dulcis extract


Low-density lipoprotein


Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ)-coactivator 1α


Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha


Reactive oxygen species


Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1


Superoxide dismutase


Sterol regulatory element-binding protein




  1. 1.

    Madrigal-Santillán E, Madrigal-Bujaidar E, Álvarez-González I, Sumaya-Martínez MT, Gutiérrez-Salinas J, Bautista M, et al. Review of natural products with hepatoprotective effects. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:14787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Novovic S, Andersen AM, Ersbøll AK, Nielsen OH, Jorgensen LN, Hansen MB. Proinflammatory cytokines in alcohol or gallstone induced acute pancreatitis: a prospective study. J Pancreas. 2009;18:256–62.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Wang M, Zhu P, Jiang C, Ma L, Zhang Z, Zeng X. Preliminary characterization, antioxidant activity in vitro and hepatoprotective effect on acute alcohol-induced liver injury in mice of polysaccharides from the peduncles of Hovenia dulcis. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012;50:2964–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hyun TK, Eom SH, Yu CY, Roitsch T. Hovenia dulcis - an Asian traditional herb. Planta Med. 2010;76:943–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kim HL, Sim JE, Choi HM, Choi IY, Jeong MY, Park J, et al. The AMPK pathway mediates an anti-adipogenic effect of fruits of Hovenia dulcis Thunb. Food Funct. 2014;5:2961–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kim B, Woo M, Park C, Lee S, Kim J, Kim B, et al. Hovenia Dulcis extract reduces lipid accumulation in oleic acid-induced steatosis of HepG2 cells via activation of AMPK and PPARα/CPT-1 pathway and in acute hyperlipidemia mouse model. Phyther Res. 2017;31:132–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Morales P, Maieves HA, Dias MI, Calhella RC, Sánchez-Mata MC, Santos-Buelga C, et al. Hovenia dulcis Thunb. Pseudofruits as functional foods: phytochemicals and bioactive properties in different maturity stages. J Funct Foods. 2017;29:37–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Yoshikawa M, Murakami T, Ueda T, Yoshizumi S, Ninomiya K, Murakami N, et al. Bioactive constituents of Chinese natural medicines. III. Absolute stereostructures of new dihydroflavonols, hovenitins I, II, and III, isolated from Hoveniae Semen Seu Fructus, the seed and fruit of Hovenia dulcis THUNB. (Rhamnaceae): inhibitory effect on alcohol-induced muscular relaxation and hepatoprotective activity. Yakugaku Zasshi. 1997;117:108–18.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Du J, He D, Sun LN, Han T, Zhang H, Qin LP, et al. Semen Hoveniae extract protects against acute alcohol-induced liver injury in mice. Pharm Biol. 2010;48:953–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kim YS, Park J, Kwon Y, Lim DW, Song M, Choi HY, et al. Hepatoprotective effects of hovenia dulcis extract on acute and chronic liver injuries induced by alcohol and carbon tetrachloride. Korea J Herbol. 2013;28:25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Fang HL, Lin HY, Chan MC, Lin WL, Lin WC. Treatment of chronic liver injuries in mice by oral administration of ethanolic extract of the fruit of Hovenia dulcis. Am J Chin Med. 2007;35:693–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Martins S, Mussatto SI, Martínez-Avila G, Montañez-Saenz J, Aguilar CN, Teixeira JA. Bioactive phenolic compounds: production and extraction by solid-state fermentation. A review. Biotechnol Adv. 2011;29:365–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Steinkraus KH. Fermentations in food processing. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2002;1:23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Xiang J, Zhu W, Li Z, Ling S. Effect of juice and fermented vinegar from Hovenia dulcis peduncles on chronically alcohol-induced liver damage in mice. Food Funct. 2012;3:628.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Directive 2010/63/EU. European parliament and councel on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, vol. 276; 2010. p. 33–79.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Mechesso AF, Lee SJ, Park SH, Kim JY, Im ZE, Suh JW, et al. Preventive effects of a novel herbal mixture on atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions in BALB/C mice. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2019;19:25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Yang SA, Jung YS, Lee SJ, Park SC, Kim MJ, Lee EJ, et al. Hepatoprotective effects of fermented field water-dropwort (Oenanthe javanica) extract and its major constituents. Food Chem Toxicol. 2014;67:154–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Irwin R. Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of furfural (cas no. 98–01-1) in f344/n rats and b6c3f1 mice (gavage studies). U.S. Department of health and public health service. National institutes of health. Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 1990;383:90.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Dong H, Kumar M, Zhang Y, Gyulkhandanyan A, Xiang YY, Ye B, et al. Gamma-aminobutyric acid up- and downregulates insulin secretion from beta cells in concert with changes in glucose concentration. Diabetologia. 2006;49:697–705.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Erlitzki R, Gong Y, Zhang M, Minuk G. Identification of gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit types in human and rat liver. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2000;279:33–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Li YG, Ji DF, Zhong S, Shi LG, Hu GY, Chen S. Saponins from Panax japonicus protect against alcohol-induced hepatic injury in mice by up-regulating the expression of GPX3, SOD1, and SOD3. Alcohol Alcohol. 2010;45:320–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Norikura T, Kojima-Yuasa A, Opare Kennedy D, Matsui-Yuasa I. Protective effect of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) against cytotoxicity of ethanol in isolated rat hepatocytes involves modulations in cellular polyamine levels. Amino Acids. 2007;32:419–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wang S, Sui S, Liu Z, Peng C, Liu J, Luo D, et al. Protective roles of hepatic gamma-aminobutyric acid signaling in acute ethanol exposure-induced liver injury. J Appl Toxicol. 2018;38:341–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Teplova VV, Kruglov AG, Kovalyov LI, Nikiforova AB, Fedotcheva NI, Lemasters JJ. Glutamate contributes to alcohol hepatotoxicity by enhancing oxidative stress in mitochondria. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2017;49:253–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bull-Otterson L, Feng W, Kirpich I, Wang Y, Qin X, Liu Y, et al. Metagenomic analyses of alcohol-induced pathogenic alterations in the intestinal microbiome and the effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG treatment. PLoS One. 2013;8:e53028.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ooi LG, Liong MT. Cholesterol-lowering effects of probiotics and prebiotics: a review of in vivo and in vitro findings. Int J Mol Sci. 2010;11:2499–522.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Schnabl B, Brenner DA. Interactions between the intestinal microbiome and liver diseases. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:1513–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bhat R, Axtell R, Mitra A, Miranda M, Lock C, Tsien RW, et al. Inhibitory role for GABA in autoimmune inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107:2580–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kumar S, Porcu P, Werner DF, Matthews DB, Diaz-Granados JL, Helfand RS, et al. The role of GABAA receptors in the acute and chronic effects of ethanol: a decade of progress. Psychopharmacology. 2009;205:529–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Cesaro C, Tiso A, Del Prete A, Cariello R, Tuccillo C, Cotticelli G, et al. Gut microbiota and probiotics in chronic liver diseases. Dig Liver Dis. 2011;43:431–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Fouts DE, Torralba M, Nelson KE, Brenner DA, Schnabl B. Bacterial translocation and changes in the intestinal microbiome in mouse models of liver disease. J Hepatol. 2012;56:1283–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Rezende TP, Corrêa JODA, Aarestrup BJV, Aarestrup FM, De Sousa OV, Da Silva Filho AA. Protective effects of Baccharis dracunculifolia leaves extract against carbon tetrachloride- and acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in experimental animals. Molecules. 2014;19:9257–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lieber CS. Alcoholic fatty liver: its pathogenesis and mechanism of progression to inflammation and fibrosis. Alcohol. 2004;34:9–19.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lu Y, Wu D, Wang X, Ward S-C, Cederbaum A-I. Chronic alcohol-induced liver injury and oxidant stress are decreased in cytochrome P4502E1 knockout mice and restored in humanized cytochrome P4502E1 knock-in mice. Free Radic Biol Med. 2010;49:1406–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kessova IG, Ho YS, Thung S, Cederbaum AI. Alcohol-induced liver injury in mice lacking cu, Zn-superoxide dismutase. Hepatology. 2003;38:1136–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Chen Y, Singh S, Matsumoto A, Manna SK, Abdelmegeed MA, Golla S, et al. Chronic glutathione depletion confers protection against alcohol-induced steatosis: implication for redox activation of AMP-activated protein kinase pathway. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29743.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Chaung WW, Jacob A, Ji Y, Wang P. Suppression of PGC-1alpha by ethanol: implications of its role in alcohol- induced liver injury. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2008;1:161–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Woods A, Azzout-Marniche D, Foretz M, Stein SC, Lemarchand P, Ferre P, et al. Characterization of the role of AMP-activated protein kinase in the regulation of glucose-activated gene expression using constitutively active and dominant negative forms of the kinase. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:6704–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zhou G, Myers R, Li Y, Chen Y, Shen X, Fenyk-Melody J, et al. Role of AMP-activated protein kinase in mechanism of metformin action. J Clin Invest. 2001;108:1167–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Huang LL, Wan JB, Wang B, He CW, Ma H, Li TW, et al. Suppression of acute ethanol-induced hepatic steatosis by docosahexaenoic acid is associated with downregulation of stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 and inflammatory cytokines. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fat Acids. 2013;88:347–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries (grant number: 314082–3), and by the Ministry of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) and Startups (MSS), Korea, under the “Regional Specialized Industry Development Program (R&D, P0002954)” supervised by the Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT), and Kyungpook National University Development Project Research Fund, 2018. The funding bodies have no role in designing the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information




NHP designed and carried out the experiment. AFM and NHP analyzed the results and wrote the manuscript. SJL, AFM, NB, QY, and WKY participated in the in vitro and in vivo data acquisition. SPL, JSL, and SCP conceptualized the study and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung-Chun Park.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the institutional animal care and use committee of the Kyungpook National University, Republic of Korea (Approval number: KNU 2016–121). The experiment was conducted according to the Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the councel on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes [15].

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, N., Lee, S., Mechesso, A.F. et al. Hepatoprotective effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid-enriched fermented Hovenia dulcis extract on ethanol-induced liver injury in mice. BMC Complement Med Ther 20, 75 (2020).

Download citation


  • Ethanol
  • Fermentation
  • Hepatoprotective
  • Hovenia dulcis
  • γ-Aminobutyric acid
  • Lipogenesis