Skip to main content

Anti-obesity effect of Neoagaro-oligosaccharides with overweight and obese subjects: a 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial



This trial aimed to evaluate the anti-obesity effects and safety of Neoagaro-oligosaccharides (NAOs) in humans in a 16 week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.


One hundred overweight or obese subjects with a body mass index of 23 to 34.9 kg/m2 and a percent body fat of > 25% for males or > 30% for females were enrolled. NAOs or placebo products were administered at 3 g (twice a day, four capsules once) each for 16 weeks. Efficacy and safety biomarkers were measured before and after intervention.


After 16 weeks of intervention, the group administered with NAOs had statistically significant decreases in visceral fat area and visceral-subcutaneous fat area ratio compared to the placebo group. The NAOs group suppressed the increase in weight and BMI compared to the placebo group, which was significant between groups. High-density lipoprotein- cholesterol was increased in the group administered with NAOs, which showed a significant trend compared to the placebo group. Clinical changes were not observed for any safety biomarkers.


These results suggest that NAOs have a beneficial effect on obesity. Thus, NAOs could be used as an anti-obesity supplement without side effects.

Trial registration (KCT0006640, 07/10/2021).

Peer Review reports


The prevalence of overweight and obesity has increased globally, especially in developed countries [1]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), in 2016 more than 1.9 billion adults (18 years and older) were overweight, and about 650 million were obese with 39% of the world’s population being overweight or obese [2]. Given the current trend, it has been predicted that half of the world’s adult population will be overweight or obese by 2030 [3]. Therefore, obesity is a serious worldwide health problem.

The cause of obesity is highly complex. It includes genetic, physiological, environmental, social, and economic factors and a high energy intake relative to energy expenditure, the most common cause of obesity [4]. Overweight and obesity characteristically accumulate body fat for various causes, resulting in weight gain. Obesity is not only a cosmetic problem, but also a health threat that can increase the occurrence of metabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) associated with insulin resistance, cardiovascular disease (CVD), hyperlipidemia, fatty liver disease, and several types of cancers [5, 6]. Overweight and obesity are also associated with decreased quality of life [7, 8] and increased morbidity and mortality [9]. Consequently, obesity has increased the economic burden on the health care system due to hospitalizations and drug prescriptions for obesity-related diseases [10]. Therefore, it is necessary to develop health functional foods with an obesity preventive effect without side effects.

Gelidium elegans (G. elegans) is an edible red algae native to Asia. It has been safely consumed for a long time [11]. Agar is a major component of the cell wall of red algae. In Asia, agar has long been recognized as generally safe. Due to its unique gel-forming physicochemical properties, it has been used as a food additive and gelling agent in puddings, jellies, and other confectionery [12]. Agar is a heterogeneous polysaccharide composed of repeating units of β-1,4-D-galactopyranosyl-α-1,3-L-galactopyranose [13]. Neoagaro-oligosaccharides (NAOs) are made by hydrolyzing agar/agarose and are prepared by breaking β-(1–4) bonds using β-agarase [14, 15]. NAOs have various activities, including anti-obesity [13,14,15,16], hypolipidemic [17], antioxidant [18,19,20,21], anti-inflammatory [22,23,24], and whitening of melanoma cells [25, 26] effects.

In previous preclinical studies, anti-obesity effects of NAOs have been reported, including weight loss, adipocyte size reduction, and blood glucose and lipid improvement [13, 14, 17]. In addition, NAOs supplementation in obese mice improved body weight and metabolic syndrome by increasing the abundance of intestinal microorganisms such as Eubacterium fissicatena and Ruminococcaceae UCG-005 and showed anti-obesity effects [15].

However, no evidence has been found in humans for the anti-obesity effects of NAOs. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the anti-obesity efficacy and safety of NAOs intake for 16 weeks by conducting a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in overweight and obese adults.


Study design

This 16-week, single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, clinical study was conducted at Wonkwang University Korean Medicine Hospital in Jeonju from August 2021 to May 2022. The study protocol and informed consent form were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Wonkwang University Korean Medicine Hospital (IRB approval No.: WUJKMH-IRB-2021-0008). This study was registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), the Republic of Korea ( clinical trial No.: KCT0006640, registered on 07/10/2021). This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Guideline for Good Clinical Practice by the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH GCP). All participants provided written informed consent before participating in this study.

Participants were recruited through several ways (banner, newspaper, Wonkwang University Korean Medicine Hospital web page, and so on). A screening visit was conducted within two weeks of the first visit to select subjects who met the inclusion & exclusion criteria. After baseline evaluation, participants were randomly assigned to test and placebo groups at a 1:1 ratio. One hundred subjects received each product at each visit every eight weeks for three visits (visit 1: week 0; visit 2: week 8; and visit 3: week 16).

During the 16-week study period, subjects were asked to maintain their usual lifestyle including dietary intake and physical activity. They were asked to avoid consuming other functional foods or dietary supplements. Efficacy and safety were evaluated before and after the study period.

Study subjects

One hundred participants were eligible after screening tests such as questionnaires, physical examinations, and laboratory examinations. They were enrolled within two weeks after providing informed consent and before they were given supplement.

Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) those aged between 19 and 65 years old on screening test; (2) those with a body mass index (BMI) ≤ 34.9 kg/m² but ≥ 23 kg/m², percent body fat (PBF) > 25% for males and PBF > 30% for females; and (3) those who provided written consent after being thoroughly educated about the study’s aims and goals.

Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) subjects with a weight change of 10% or more within 3 months prior to the screening test; (2) those who took supplement of medicines or health functional foods that might affect body weight within 1 month prior to the screening test; (3) subjects who had an obesity surgery within 1 year; (4) those with a clinically acute disease or chronic cardiovascular, endocrine, immune, respiratory, hepatobiliary, kidney, urinary, neuropsychiatric, musculoskeletal, inflammatory, hematological, or gastrointestinal disease; (5) diabetic patients who were treated with oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin on screening tests; (6) those with a history of clinically significant hypersensitivity to seaweed or agar; (7) those who were undergoing fasting therapies; (8) those who were administered with antipsychotics within 3 months prior to the screening test; (9) those with a history of medicine abuse; (10) those who participated in other human tests within three months prior to the screening test; 11) those who had the following diagnostic and medical test results: ☞ aspartate transaminase (AST) or alanine transaminase (ALT) > 3 times the upper limit of the reference range; ☞ serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL; 12) those who were pregnant or nursing; 13) subjects within 6 months of childbirth; 14) those who were fertile and not taking contraceptives; and 15) those who were judged by the principal investigator to be inappropriate for participation in this study because of laboratory test results and so on.

Study products

Test products used in this study were provided by Dyne Bio Inc.(Sungnam, Korea). As described in previous studies [13,14,15, 17], NAOs were prepared by dissolving G. elegans into agar, enzymatically reacted with β-agarase, concentrated, and dried. NAOs are produced from agar by cleavage of the β-1,4 bond by β-agarase. For standardization of NAOs, Neoagarotetraose (DP4) and Neoagarohexaose (DP6) were set as standard compounds, and were standardized to 280.05 mg/g and 197.48 mg/g, respectively. A high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) chromatogram of the NAOs is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Representative chromatograms of NAOs based on high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of Neoagarotetraose (DP4) and Neoagarohexaose (DP6)

The 3 g/day dose is based on our preclinical studies [13], that including the same dose significantly reduced weight in the obese mouse model. In addition, the intake of powdered agar, a notified health functional food (HFF) approved by Korea’s Ministry of Food and Drug Safety of Korea (MFDS) for improving bowel movements, is 2 to 5 g/day, and the intake of extract of G. elegans, an individually approved HFF for weight loss, is 1 g/day. Therefore, the average animal test and HFF intake is equivalent to 3 g/day.

All subjects were randomly assigned to a group administered with NAOs (3 g/day of NAOs) or a placebo group (0 g/day of NAOs). Subjects took 3 g per day (twice after breakfast and dinner, four capsules once) for 16 weeks. The placebo capsules contained corn starch with the same weight, energy, carbohydrate content and appearance as the test capsules (Table 1).

Table 1 Composition of the test products

Efficacy outcome measurements

All subjects were subjected to efficacy evaluation before and after intake for 16 weeks during the study period. To measure abdominal fat area, subjects underwent a computed tomography (CT; WCT-200-140, Hispeed Dual) scan. Ab-dominal fat CT scans were taken with subjects lying on their backs. Total abdominal fat area (TFA), visceral fat area (VFA), and subcutaneous fat area (SFA) were measured, and the visceral-subcutaneous fat area ratio (VSR) was calculated. The same machine was used throughout the study period to evaluate changes in anthropometric parameters, including body weight, body mass index (BMI; kg/m2), waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), and waist-hip ratio (WHR). Body fat mass (BFM), percent body fat (PBF), and lean body mass (LBM) were analyzed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA; Primus, OsteoSys). Blood collection was performed in a fasting state for lipid profiles assessment, including total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), triglyceride, and free fatty acid.

Safety Outcome measurements

To evaluate safety, all adverse events (AEs) were monitored. Laboratory tests, urinalysis, vital signs, and electrocardiograms were performed before and after 16 weeks of administration. Laboratory tests included hematological tests [white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell (RBC), hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets] and blood bio-chemical tests [alkaline phosphatase (ALP), AST, ALT, total bilirubin, total protein, albumin, gamma-glutamyl transferase (gamma-GT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, glucose, lactate dehy-drogenase (LD), creatine kinase (CK), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)]. Blood was collected after fasting for 12 h. Urinalysis measures specific gravity and pH in urine. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pulse were measured to evaluate vital signs.

Dietary intake and physical activity assessment

During the study period, subjects maintained their usual dietary intake. Changes in dietary intake were evaluated through a standardized 3-day dietary record (2 days on weekdays, 1 day on weekends). Dietary intake was analyzed by a trained dietitian. Total daily intakes of energy, carbohydrates, lipids, protein, and fiber were analyzed using a Computer-Aided Nutritional analysis program (CAN-pro, Korean Nutrition Society, Seoul).

Subjects were asked to maintain their usual physical activity during the study period. Changes in physical activity were measured according to activity using a global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ). GPAQ is a questionnaire that measures physical activity in three domains, including work (vigorous-to-moderate intensity activity for more than 10 min for daily work-related activities), transport (activities such as cycling and walking for more than 10 min for movement of place), and recreation (vigorous-to-moderate intensity activity for more than 10 min for leisure activities) [27]. Metabolic equivalent of task (MET) values were calculated using GPAQ data.

Statistical analysis

The sample size was referenced from a similar previous study [28]. It was determined to achieve 80% statistical power with an alpha of 0.05. The sample size for each group was determined by allowing a dropout rate of 20%. Based on the calculation, 50 subjects per group (a total of 100 subjects) were needed.

All statistical analyses were performed using SAS® (version 9.4; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Continuous variables were presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) and categorical variables were presented as frequencies. Data analysis for efficacy was performed using the full analysis set (FAS). Analysis for safety was performed using the safety set. Statistical analysis was performed for data according to protocol criteria. Significant differences in demographic characteristics at baseline were analyzed using the Chi-square test (Fisher’s exact test). Mean comparisons between the two groups were performed using an independent t-test. Statistical analysis between the two groups was performed using an independent t-test for change values before and after 16 weeks of intervention. Within each group, the comparison between before intake and 16 weeks after intake was analyzed using a paired t-test. Differences were considered statistically significant at a p-value < 0.05.


Baseline characteristics of subjects

A total of 110 participants were screened, and 100 subjects who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were selected and randomly assigned to the NAOs and placebo groups. A total of 84 subjects were examined at follow-up according to the criteria of protocol (Fig. 2). Demographic characteristics measured at baseline of 84 subjects have been summarized in Table 2. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics such as gender, age, height, weight, BMI, PBF, SBP, DBP, or pulse measured between the two groups at the screening visit or visit 1.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Flow chart of subjects. Number of study participants enrolled, allocated, followed, and analyzed, shown using the CONSORT 2010 Flow Diagram. FAS, full analysis set

Table 2 Baseline demographic characteristics of subjects

Dietary intake and physical activity

Dietary intake surveys and physical activity questionnaires were used before and after the intervention. The results of the changes have been presented in Table 3. There were no significant differences in changes of energy, carbohydrate, lipid, protein, or fiber intake between NAOs and placebo groups.

Table 3 Dietary intake and Physical Activity changes

There were no significant differences in MET values, indicating similar physical activity in the two groups. Therefore, dietary intake and physical activity during the study period were well maintained without affecting study results.

Efficacy evaluation

Efficacy evaluation biomarkers were measured before intervention and 16 weeks after intervention. Results are shown in Table 4; Fig. 3, 4 and 5. The change value of VFA was − 393.975 ± 1288.335 mm2 in the group administered with NAOs and + 198.425 ± 918.599 mm2 in the placebo group, showing a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.021). The VSR in the NAOs group changed to -0.022 ± 0.051 after 16 weeks of intake compared to that before intake. It was significantly reduced within the group (p = 0.011). The change was significantly different compared to the placebo group (p = 0.023).

Table 4 Changes in efficacy outcomes before and after 16 weeks of intake
Fig. 3
figure 3

Representative abdominal fat CT data at baseline and 16 weeks in a subject from NAOs or placebo group. NAOs, Neoagaro-oligosaccharides; CT, computed tomography; TFA, total abdominal fat area; VFA, visceral fat area; SFA, subcutaneous fat area; VSR, visceral-subcutaneous fat area ratio

Fig. 4
figure 4

Change in body fat areas. (A) Visceral fat area(VFA), (B) Visceral-subcutaneous fat ratio(VSR) were measured in NAOs and placebo treated groups at baseline and 16 weeks. Values are pre-sented as mean ± SD. Between-group differences were assessed using independent t-test for change value between the groups. *p < 0.05 vs. placebo group. NAOs, Neoagaro-oligosaccharides; VFA, visceral fat area; VSR, visceral-subcutaneous fat area ratio

Among anthropometric indicators, weight was significantly increased by + 1.226 ± 1.853 kg in the placebo group (p = 0.0001) but decreased by -0.024 ± 2.012 kg in the NAOs group, which was statistically significant between the two groups (p = 0.004) as weight gain was suppressed by NAOs intake. BMI as an indicator of obesity was also significantly increased in the placebo group by + 0.444 ± 0.676 kg/m2 (p = 0.0001) but decreased by -0.002 ± 0.776 kg/m2 in the NAOs group, showing a statistically significant difference between NAOs and placebo groups (p = 0.007) as the increase in BMI was suppressed by NAOs intake.

Regarding blood lipid profile, the HDL-C value was increased by + 1.902 ± 7.074 mg/dL in the NAOs group but decreased by -1.024 ± 8.226 mg/dL in the placebo group, showing a trend of significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.088). In addition, there was no significant difference in the efficacy evaluation index.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Change in anthropometric parameters. (A) Weight, (B) Body mass index (BMI) were measured in NAOs and placebo treated groups at baseline and 16 weeks. Values are presented as mean ± SD. Between-group differences were assessed using independent t-test for change value between the groups. **p < 0.01 vs. placebo group. NAOs, Neoagaro-oligosaccharides; BMI, body mass index

Safety evaluation

During the study period, 19 cases (11 cases in the NAOs group and 8 cases in the placebo group) showed mild adverse reactions. The adverse reactions in the NAOs group were 1 case of sore throat, 1 case of cold (sore throat), and 9 cases of COVID-19. In the placebo group, there was 1 case of dyspepsia, 1 case of allergic rhinitis, 1 case of back pain, and 5 cases of COVID-19. However, the incidence of adverse events showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). All adverse events were not clearly related to the intake of the investigational product.

The two groups had no significant differences in the results of blood tests, electrocardiograms, or vital signs for safety evaluation. They were all within their normal ranges. During this study, no clinically significant changes were observed (Table 5). Thus, intake of NAOs was evaluated as safe for humans.

Table 5 Changes in safety outcomes before and after 16 weeks of intake


We performed a 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the anti-obesity efficacy and safety of NAOs in overweight and obese subjects. After 16 weeks of intake, VFA and VSR were significantly reduced in the NAOs group, and weight and BMI were significantly suppressed from increase compared to the placebo group. HDL-C showed a tendency to increase significantly in the NAOs group compared to the placebo group.

Obesity is defined as an excess of body fat [29]. The association of obesity, insulin resistance, and chronic low-grade inflammation has been evident for several years [30]. It is related to the occurrence of metabolic diseases such as CVD and diabetes [31, 32]. The importance of abdominal visceral fat in maintaining health, makes accurate visceral fat measurement crucial. Among the methods for measuring abdominal visceral fat, waist circumference (WC) is an easy to measure indicator of obesity [32, 33]. While, measurement of visceral fat and subcutaneous fat by computed tomography (CT) can more accurately reflect the amount of visceral fat and risks of various metabolic diseases and cardiovascular disease, it is expensive and risks radiation exposure [34, 35]. The VSR along with absolute fat mass or area is an indicator of body fat distribution that correlates with CVD risk [36]. Indeed, the relative distribution of abdominal fat might be more important than visceral and subcutaneous fat areas as VSR is more strongly associated with risk of CVD than visceral fat area [36]. In this study, intake of NAOs significantly reduced VFA and VSR compared to the intake of placebo. These results suggest that NAOs can reduce body fat accumulation, and prevent the progression of metabolic syndrome caused by obesity.

BMI has long been recognized as a predictor of morbidity and mortality from numerous chronic diseases, including type 2 diabetes, CVD, and stroke [37, 38]. Recent clinical guidelines indicate that BMI best classifies disease risk and that obesity can be diagnosed based on BMI. In Asia, overweight, obesity grade I, and obesity grade II are defined as body mass index (BMI) of 23–24.9 kg/m2, 25–29.9 kg/m2, and > 30 kg/m2, respectively [39]. This study set a BMI of 23 to 35 kg/m2 as the selection criterion for overweight and obese subjects. Those with severe obesity requiring treatment with a BMI > 35 kg/m2 were excluded. The results of NAOs intake for 16 weeks confirmed that the increase in body weight and BMI was suppressed.

The mechanism of the anti-obesity effect of NAOs was confirmed in several preclinical studies, including weight loss, adipocyte size reduction, blood glucose and lipid improvement through PPAR-r and MAPK signaling pathways, adiponectin regulation, and gut microbiome modulation [13,14,15, 17]. The effect of NAOs on HFD-induced obese mice effectively suppressed obesity and metabolic diseases associated with obesity (hyperlipidemia, steatosis, insulin resistance, and glucose intolerance) through increased adiponectin production and regulation of the gut microbiome. [13, 15]. In mice with type 2 diabetes induced by a high-fat diet and injection of alloxan, NAOs had the effect of improving lipid metabolism and lipid accumulation through regulation of MAPK-Nrf2 and PPARγ pathway [14]. Therefore, the intake of NAOs in humans was consistent with the results of preclinical tests conducted with the same raw materials, confirming the consistency of the study results.

This study found no differences in biomarkers except VFA, VSR, weight, and BMI. Obesity is influenced by various factors, including individual characteristics, dietary intake, and physical activity [40]. Additionally, it can be difficult to interpret observed differences between intervention groups in weight management RCTs. Because intercurrent events that occur after study initiation may affect the interpretation of results at the end of the intervention [41]. Therefore, more accurate studies are required to detect the variations in other indicators of obesity and to find precise mechanisms under the control of lifestyle factors, food intake and physical activity. This study was conducted from August 2021 to May 2022 and was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. The global lockdown restrictions to curb the COVID-19 pandemic have altered many aspects of daily life, including diet and physical activity [42]. Nevertheless, VFA, VSR, weight, and BMI were significantly changed by NAOs intake compared to the placebo group, confirming the anti-obesity effect.

Placebo is used to control for placebo effects in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) because it is necessary to blind researchers or subjects to prevent influence on study results. A placebo looks like a test product but contains no active ingredients. Placebos must have the same appearance, same dosage, same delivery method, and be taken at the same time at the same frequency [43]. Therefore, in this study, corn starch, which had similar weight, appearance, calories, and carbohydrate content to the test product and had no functions or side effects, was used as a placebo ingredient. For this reason, corn starch is used as a placebo ingredient in several clinical studies [44,45,46]. Therefore, we believe that corn starch, used as a placebo ingredient in this study, would have had a weak effect on the results.

In preclinical studies, NAOs decreased total cholesterol, triglyceride, and LDL-C and increased HDL-C in the blood of animal models [14, 15, 17]. Because NAOs increased the nuclear translocation of SREBP-2 and showed a lipid improvement effect by regulating a crucial transcription factor for LDLR gene expression [17]. However, in this clinical study, LDL-C and HDL-C increased or tended to increase, and total cholesterol and triglyceride did not change. All biomarkers were within the normal range, and no clinically significant changes were observed, so it was evaluated as safe with no effect on lipid metabolism. The baseline values of lipid profiles in Table 4 indicate that the average lipid profile in this study was within the normal range. The subjects recruited in this study were overweight or obese but were healthy without any signs of metabolic syndrome or dyslipidemia. Therefore, it was evaluated as safe for healthy people to consume NAOs without clinical problems. Additionally, NAOs have been recognized as a New Dietary Ingredient (NDI) by the U.S. FDA (NDI Number: NDI 1237) and as other food processed products by Korea’s MFDS (Item Manufacturing Report No.: 19960372607460) and can be used as food raw materials. Therefore, NAOs have been recognized as safe. In this present study, clinically meaningful adverse reactions or body changes (blood test, electrocardiogram or vital signs) were not observed during the clinical trial, indicating that the consumption of NAOs was safe for humans.

In this clinical trial, no side effects or serious adverse reactions were observed in blood tests, electrocardiograms, or vital signs, or reported in interviews. These results confirm that daily intake of NAO for 16 weeks is safe for humans.

Our study is the first human study about the anti-obesity effect of NAOs. However, a few limitations of this study should be considered. First, although the number of subjects was calculated by referring to previous similar studies, the sample size was small, limiting our findings’ generalizability. Large-scale studies are needed in the future. Second, regarding the gender of subjects, all subjects in this study were women. It is generally known that the body fat percentage and incidence of obesity are higher in women than in men [47, 48]. For this reason, female subjects were mainly recruited and participated. However, to generalize the effects of NAOs, it is necessary to consider gender. Thus, men should be included in such studies in the future. Third, questionnaires on bowel habits were not measured, and no stool samples were collected for gut microbiome. It is known that the gut microbiome plays a crucial role in the development of obesity [49, 50]. In a previous study, NAOs showed anti-obesity effects through gut microbiome modulation in obese rats [15]. Additionally, clinical studies conducted with extracts of G. elegans, a raw material for NAOs, showed improvement in stool symptom score on the PAC-SYM and abdominal discomfort scores [11]. Therefore, future research requires expanded clinical studies to evaluate the effects of NAOs on obesity and gut health. Finally, seaweed intake was not restricted during the study period. Korea, Japan, and parts of China have the highest seaweed consumption [51]. Therefore, even if the daily intake of nutrients was the same, the results of the study could be influenced by the amount of seaweed intake. Therefore, a tight dietary restriction of seaweed is required in the daily diet.

However, our study has a good design and advantages. It can provide substantial evidence for the anti-obesity effect of NAOs.


As a result of a 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial on the anti-obesity effect of NAOs in overweight and obese subjects, VFA and VSR were significantly decreased, and weight and BMI were significantly suppressed from increase compared to the placebo group. Therefore, NAOs have a beneficial effect on obesity prevention, suggesting that they could be developed as an anti-obesity supplement without side effects.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the study are not publicly available to study subject confidentiality but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



adverse events


alanine transaminase


aspartate transaminase


body fat mass


body mass index


blood urea nitrogen


computer-Aided Nutritional analysis program


creatine kinase


cardiovascular disease


clinical Research Information Service


computed tomography


diastolic blood pressure


dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry


gamma-glutamyl transferase


global physical activity questionnaire


high sensitivity C-reactive protein


high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol


hip circumference


health functional food


international Conference on Harmonization


lean body mass


lactate dehy-drogenase




ministry of Food and Drug Safety of Korea




percent body fat


red blood cell


systolic blood pressure


subcutaneous fat area


total abdominal fat area


type 2 diabetes mellitus


visceral fat area


visceral-subcutaneous fat area ratio


white blood cell


waist circumference


waist-hip ratio


world Health Organization


  1. Roslim NA, Ahmad A, Mansor M, Aung MMT, Hamzah F, Hassan H, Lua PL. Hypnotherapy for overweight and obese patients: a narrative review. J Integr Med. 2021;19(1):1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. WHO. : Obesity and Overweight. In.: (accessed on 24 May 2023).

  3. Cho YG, Yang YJ, Yoon YS, Lee ES, Lee JH, Jeong Y, Kang CH. Effect of MED-02 containing two probiotic strains, limosilactobacillus fermentum MG4231 and MG4244, on body Fat reduction in overweight or obese subjects: a Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, placebo-controlled study. Nutrients 2022, 14(17).

  4. Wright SM, Aronne LJ. Causes of obesity. Abdom Imaging. 2012;37(5):730–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Polyzos SA, Kountouras J, Mantzoros CS. Obesity and nonalcoholic fatty Liver Disease: from pathophysiology to therapeutics. Metabolism. 2019;92:82–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chooi YC, Ding C, Magkos F. The epidemiology of obesity. Metabolism. 2019;92:6–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Purton T, Mond J, Cicero D, Wagner A, Stefano E, Rand-Giovannetti D, Latner J. Body dissatisfaction, internalized weight bias and quality of life in young men and women. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(7):1825–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Busutil R, Espallardo O, Torres A, Martinez-Galdeano L, Zozaya N, Hidalgo-Vega A. The impact of obesity on health-related quality of life in Spain. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):197.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Yeh TL, Chen HH, Chiu HH, Chiu YH, Hwang LC, Wu SL. Morbidity associated with overweight and obesity in health personnel: a 10-year retrospective of hospital-based cohort study in Taiwan. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019;12:267–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Peng FLHH, Nor NM, Said R. Burden of Disease attributable to overweight and obesity in Malaysia. Malays J Public Health Med. 2018;18(1):11–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Choi HI, Cha JM, Jeong IK, Cho IJ, Yoon JY, Kwak MS, Jeon JW, Kim SJ. Efficacy and safety of Gelidium Elegans intake on bowel symptoms in obese adults: a 12-week randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Med (Baltim). 2019;98(17):e14981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu SY, Kan J, Hu Z, Liu Y, Du H, Pang GC, Cheong KL. Quantification of Neoagaro-Oligosaccharide production through enzymatic hydrolysis and its anti-oxidant activities. Molecules 2018, 23(6).

  13. Hong SJ, Lee JH, Kim EJ, Yang HJ, Park JS, Hong SK. Anti-obesity and anti-diabetic effect of Neoagarooligosaccharides on High-Fat Diet-Induced obesity in mice. Mar Drugs 2017, 15(4).

  14. Lin F, Yang D, Huang Y, Zhao Y, Ye J, Xiao M. The potential of Neoagaro-oligosaccharides as a treatment of type II Diabetes in mice. Mar Drugs 2019, 17(10).

  15. Oh JK, Vasquez R, Kim SH, Lee JH, Kim EJ, Hong S-K, Kang D-K. Neoagarooligosaccharides modulate gut microbiota and alleviate body weight gain and metabolic syndrome in high-fat diet-induced obese rats. J Funct Foods. 2022;88:104869.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Choi J, Kim KJ, Koh EJ, Lee BY. Gelidium Elegans regulates the AMPK-PRDM16-UCP-1 pathway and has a synergistic effect with Orlistat on Obesity-Associated Features in mice Fed a High-Fat Diet. Nutrients 2017, 9(4).

  17. Yang JH, Cho SS, Kim KM, Kim JY, Kim EJ, Park EY, Lee JH, Ki SH. Neoagarooligosaccharides enhance the level and efficiency of LDL receptor and improve cholesterol homeostasis. J Funct Foods. 2017;38:529–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shao-Chi Wu T-NW. Algal-oligosaccharide-lysates prepared by two bacterial agarases stepwise hydrolyzed and their anti-oxidative properties. Fish Sci. 2005;71:1149–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen HM, Yan XJ. Antioxidant activities of agaro-oligosaccharides with different degrees of polymerization in cell-based system. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1722(1):103–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen H, Yan X, Zhu P, Lin J. Antioxidant activity and hepatoprotective potential of agaro-oligosaccharides in vitro and in vivo. Nutr J. 2006;5:31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kang OL, Ghani M, Hassan O, Rahmati S, Ramli N. Novel agaro-oligosaccharide production through enzymatic hydrolysis: physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities. Food Hydrocolloids. 2014;42(2):304–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Enoki T, Tominaga T, Takashima F, Ohnogi H, Sagawa H, Kato I. Anti-tumor-promoting activities of agaro-oligosaccharides on two-stage mouse skin carcinogenesis. Biol Pharm Bull. 2012;35(7):1145–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Enoki T, Tanabe M, Shimomura M, Ohnogi H. Induction mechanism of heme oxygenase-1 and anti-inflammatory activity by agaro-oligosaccharides. Nippon Shokuhin Kogyo Gakkaishi. 2010;57:157–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Higashimura Y, Naito Y, Takagi T, Tanimura Y, Mizushima K, Harusato A, Fukui A, Yoriki H, Handa O, Ohnogi H, et al. Preventive effect of agaro-oligosaccharides on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced small intestinal injury in mice. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29(2):310–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim JH, Yun EJ, Yu S, Kim KH, Kang NJ. Different levels of skin whitening activity among 3,6-Anhydro-l-Galactose, agarooligosaccharides, and Neoagarooligosaccharides. Mar Drugs. 2017;15(10):321.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kobayashi R, Takisada M, Suzuki T, Kirimuraab K, Usamiab S. Neoagarobiose as a novel moisturizer with whitening effect. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1997;61:162–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Organization WH. Global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ) analysis guide. In.

  28. Blankson H, Stakkestad JA, Fagertun H, Thom E, Wadstein J, Gudmundsen O. Conjugated linoleic acid reduces body fat mass in overweight and obese humans. J Nutr. 2000;130(12):2943–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tchernof A, Despres JP. Pathophysiology of human visceral obesity: an update. Physiol Rev. 2013;93(1):359–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zeyda M, Stulnig TM. Obesity, inflammation, and insulin resistance–a mini-review. Gerontology. 2009;55(4):379–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Choi B, Steiss D, Garcia-Rivas J, Kojaku S, Schnall P, Dobson M, Baker D. Comparison of body mass index with waist circumference and skinfold-based percent body fat in firefighters: adiposity classification and associations with Cardiovascular Disease risk factors. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016;89(3):435–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ortega FB, Lavie CJ, Blair SN. Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease. Circ Res. 2016;118(11):1752–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kawada T, Andou T, Fukumitsu M. Waist circumference, visceral abdominal fat thickness and three components of metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2016;10(1):4–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Roriz AK, Passos LC, de Oliveira CC, Eickemberg M, Moreira Pde A, Sampaio LR. Evaluation of the accuracy of anthropometric clinical indicators of visceral fat in adults and elderly. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(7):e103499.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Nagaretani H, Nakamura T, Funahashi T, Kotani K, Miyanaga M, Tokunaga K, Takahashi M, Nishizawa H, Kishida K, Kuriyama H. Visceral fat is a major contributor for multiple risk factor clustering in Japanese men with impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(12):2127–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaess BM, Pedley A, Massaro JM, Murabito J, Hoffmann U, Fox CS. The ratio of visceral to subcutaneous fat, a metric of body fat distribution, is a unique correlate of cardiometabolic risk. Diabetologia. 2012;55(10):2622–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Heart N, Lung, Institute B, Diabetes NIo, Diseases K. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 1998.

  38. WHO. : Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. 2000.

  39. WHO. : The Asia-Pacific perspective: redefining obesity and its treatment. 2000.

  40. Lampure A, Castetbon K, Hanafi M, Deglaire A, Schlich P, Peneau S, Hercberg S, Mejean C. Relative influence of socioeconomic, psychological and sensory characteristics, physical activity and Diet on 5-Year Weight Gain in French adults. Nutrients 2017, 9(11).

  41. Wharton S, Astrup A, Endahl L, Lean MEJ, Satylganova A, Skovgaard D, Wadden TA, Wilding JPH. Estimating and reporting treatment effects in clinical trials for weight management: using estimands to interpret effects of intercurrent events and missing data. Int J Obes (Lond). 2021;45(5):923–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Elisabeth AL, Karlen SB, Magkos F. The Effect of COVID-19-related lockdowns on Diet and physical activity in older adults: a systematic review. Aging Dis. 2021;12(8):1935–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bishop FL, Adams AE, Kaptchuk TJ, Lewith GT. Informed consent and placebo effects: a content analysis of information leaflets to identify what clinical trial participants are told about placebos. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(6):e39661.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu Y, Pan X, Zhang S, Wang W, Cai M, Li Y, Yang F, Guo H. Protective effect of corn peptides against alcoholic liver injury in men with chronic alcohol consumption: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Lipids Health Dis. 2014;13:192.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Zheng A, Moritani T. Effect of the combination of ginseng, oriental bezoar and glycyrrhiza on autonomic nervous activity and immune system under mental arithmetic stress. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2008;54(3):244–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mirabi P, Namdari M, Alamolhoda S, Mojab F. The Effect of Melissa Officinalis Extract on the severity of primary Dysmenorrha. Iran J Pharm Res. 2017;16(Suppl):171–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Kanter R, Caballero B. Global gender disparities in obesity: a review. Adv Nutr. 2012;3(4):491–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Park HS, Yun YS, Park JY, Kim YS, Choi JM. Obesity, abdominal obesity, and clustering of cardiovascular risk factors in South Korea. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2003;12(4):411–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Oh JK, Amoranto MBC, Oh NS, Kim S, Lee JY, Oh YN, Shin YK, Yoon Y, Kang DK. Synergistic effect of Lactobacillus gasseri and Cudrania tricuspidata on the modulation of body weight and gut microbiota structure in diet-induced obese mice. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104(14):6273–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Shen J, Obin MS, Zhao L. The gut microbiota, obesity and insulin resistance. Mol Aspects Med. 2013;34(1):39–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Jensen A. Present and future needs for algae and algal products. In: Fourteenth International Seaweed Symposium: 1993: Springer; 1993: 15–23.

Download references


We would like to express our gratitude to all study subjects and researchers.


This research was supported by Korea Institute of Marine Science & Technology Promotion(KIMST) funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea (20200034).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Conceptualization and study design: HIB, KCH, YKP, JHL, EJK, HJK, and JCJ; Investigation: JCJ; Statistical analysis: YKP; Data interpretation: HIB, KCH, YKP, and JCJ; Manuscript preparation: HIB, KCH, YKP, and JCJ; Fund collection: JHL, EJK, and HJK. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong Cheon Joo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research included clinical trial and authors have included a statement that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with subject. All the procedures for the clinical trial were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Wonkwang University Korean Medicine Hospital (IRB approval No.: WUJKMH-IRB-2021-0008). This study was registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), Republic of Korea (KCT0006640, 07/10/2021).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baek, HI., Ha, KC., Park, Y.K. et al. Anti-obesity effect of Neoagaro-oligosaccharides with overweight and obese subjects: a 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. BMC Complement Med Ther 23, 368 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: