Skip to main content
Download PDF

Yoga is effective for treating chronic pain in veterans with Gulf War Illness at long-term follow-up

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies volume 23, Article number: 319 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gulf War Illness (GWI) recommend integrative health approaches such as yoga for relief from symptoms, yet little is known about the long-term efficacy of yoga in reducing symptoms of GWI. Here, we evaluated the long-term efficacy of yoga and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) chronic pain treatment in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 75 Veterans (57 men, 42–71 ± 7.1 years of age) with Gulf War Illness (GWI).

Methods

Participants received either 10 weeks of yoga or 10 weeks of CBT for chronic pain. The primary outcome measures were pain severity, and pain interference (Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form). The secondary outcome measures were fatigue, as indicated by a measure of functional exercise capacity (6-Minute Walk Test), depression, autonomic symptom severity, and quality of life. Piecewise linear mixed models were used to examine study hypotheses.

Results

Compared to the CBT group, yoga was associated with greater reductions in pain severity during the 6-month follow-up period (group × time interaction: b = 0.036, se = 0.014, p = .011). Although we did not find between-group differences in the other primary or secondary outcome measures during follow-up (p’s > 0.05), exploratory analyses revealed within-group improvements in pain interference, total pain (an experimental outcome variable which combines pain severity and interference), and fatigue in the yoga group (p’s < 0.05) but not in the CBT group.

Conclusions

This is the first study to report long-term follow-up results of yoga as a treatment for GWI. Our results suggest that yoga may offer long-term efficacy in reducing pain, which is a core symptom of GWI.

Trial registration

Secondary analyses of ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02378025.

Peer Review reports

Background

Veterans from the First Gulf War Era (1990–1991) frequently present with a chronic multisymptom illness known as Gulf War Illness (GWI) that manifests as myriad symptoms, ranging from widespread chronic pain, headaches, sleep difficulties, fatigue, mood and cognitive impairments, to respiratory issues, gastrointestinal disturbances, and skin abnormalities [1,2,3]. Of the estimated 700,000 service members who served in Operation Desert Storm/Shield, approximately 203,000 (29%) to 420,000 (60%) met the CDC’s criteria for GWI [4].

There are currently few effective treatments for GWI. A 2019 review of GWI treatments [5], which found four treatments that had moved beyond Phase II trial, reported only modest efficacy of pharmacological [6], rehabilitation [7, 8], and psychological interventions [7]. For example, a randomized, double-blind, trial of doxycycline versus placebo for GWI failed to find significant between-group differences in measures of physical health, pain, fatigue, and cognitive function [6]. In a randomized controlled trial of aerobic exercise and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for GWI, the adjusted odds ratio (ORadj) for physical function in the exercise alone group (primary outcome; vs. usual care) was 1.07, the ORadj in the CBT alone group (vs. usual care) was 1.72, and the ORadj in the exercise plus CBT group was 1.84 [7]. Secondary outcome measures of fatigue, distress, cognitive symptoms, and mental health functioning significantly improved in the exercise group and in the exercise plus CBT group but only cognitive symptoms and mental health functioning improved in the CBT alone group. Importantly, significant reductions in pain were not found in any of the treatment groups.

Similar conclusions regarding available treatments for GWI were reached by the VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of chronic multisymptom illness [9] which recommends an integrative health approach to treating GWI including yoga, meditation or physical exercise. In particular, yoga, which may partially exert its salubrious effects through enhanced interoceptive awareness [10], has been shown to reduce pain in other pain-centric conditions, such as fibromyalgia [11], rheumatic diseases [12], and multiple sclerosis [13]. Therefore, further long-term studies are needed to establish yoga as an effective treatment for GWI.

We recently published an RCT examining yoga as a treatment for GWI which to our knowledge was the first such study [14]. Cognitive behavioral therapy was used as the active control condition because it is the only psychological treatment that has been tested for GWI [7], it is the only psychological treatment that is strongly recommended by the VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of chronic multisymptom illness [9], and because it has not shown efficacy in treating pain in GWI [7]. Our study compared a 10-week yoga program to CBT (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02378025; N = 75 randomized). At end-of-treatment, the primary outcomes of pain severity and interference (Brief Pain Inventory- Short Form) improved in the yoga condition but not in the CBT condition. While the differences between groups were not statistically significant, the difference in an a-priori-defined experimental outcome variable which combined these two variables into a “total pain” variable was statistically significant. Furthermore, fatigue was reduced significantly more in the yoga group than in the CBT group as indicated by a measure of functional exercise capacity (6-min walk test). While these effects of yoga on core symptoms of GWI are promising, it is important to establish the durability of the treatment effect. Here, we present findings from a long-term follow-up analysis that sought to determine whether these treatment differences and gains were sustained during the 6-month follow-up period.

Methods

Procedure

The parent trial randomized Veterans with GWI into one of two treatment arms: (a) 10 weeks of manualized CBT for pain or (b) 10 weeks of manualized yoga for pain (see [14] for details). The study was conducted from June of 2015 to March of 2018 at the War Related Illness & Injury Study Center at the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System in accordance with the latest version of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Stanford University Institutional Review Board (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02378025). In the parent trial, participants completed the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF; primary outcome) at baseline, weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8, and at end-of-treatment (EOT; within one week of session 10). The secondary outcome measures were completed at baseline and at EOT and included fatigue, health-related quality of life, depression, and autonomic symptom severity. In the present study, the post-treatment follow-up assessments for the BPI-SF were made at 2 months (8 weeks), 4 months (16 weeks), and 6 months (24 weeks). Secondary outcome measures were collected at 6 months (24 weeks) post-treatment.

Participants

We used the Fukuda [15] criteria to diagnose GWI, which does not require deployment. To be included in the study, we required participants to be (a) in the US armed forces between 1990 and 1991, (b) score in the moderate to severe chronic pain range on the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire [16], and (c) diagnosed with GWI per the Fukuda [15] criteria. Study exclusion criteria were (a) inability to stand or walk, (b) concurrent enrollment in a separate clinical trial, (c) considerable difficulty traveling to the study site, and (d) suicidality (intent or plan). All participants provided written informed consent. Demographic information is presented in Table 1 (n = 75, age range 42–71 years, mean 53, SD = 7.1; 24% female). Veterans were recruited using flyers, newspaper advertisements, and referrals from healthcare providers.

Table 1 Demographics and baseline clinical characteristics
Full size table

Interventions

In both treatment arms, participants met once per week for 10 weeks for 60 min in groups of ≤ 10 individuals (mean = 5.4). A CBT protocol to improve physical function in Veterans with GWI was adapted for the present study by reducing the 12 sessions to 10 sessions by eliminating the problem-solving module and the memory enhancement module [7]. The CBT modules included psychoeducation on the CBT model of pain, pacing of activities, pleasant events scheduling, identifying and challenging cognitive distortions, sleep hygiene, relaxation and stress management, interpersonal skills, and problem solving. Each session was co-led by a primary licensed psychologist and an assistant doctoral student. Group facilitators were required to have prior training and experience in delivering CBT interventions and received specific training in the GWI pain protocol from a behavioral medicine clinical psychologist with extensive CBT training.

The 10-week yoga protocol [17] incorporated breath-linked postures from the Krishnamacharya/Desikachar lineage of Hatha yoga with therapeutic adaptations based on the yoga teachers’ experience with Gulf War and Vietnam era Veterans in the VA (see Table 3 in Appendix 1 for protocol details). The classes also emphasized awareness of breath and postural adaptations for use in daily activities. Each session was facilitated by one primary yoga instructor and either one or two additional assistant yoga instructors. All yoga instructors held at least a 200 h yoga teacher certification and had previously taught yoga to Veterans. In addition to modifiable and adaptable postures, sessions included controlled breathing, hand gestures, vocalization, and meditation. Apart from the 60-minutes of weekly in-class yoga practice, participants were also asked to use a homework handout with written instructions and pictures of postures to practice yoga at home for 15–30 min on an additional 5 days. Participants could also use one of the War Related Illness and Injury Study Center yoga classes at the Palo Alto VA Medical Center to substitute for homework practice. The study protocol was developed by study co-authors LM (certified yoga therapist) and a study physiatrist who consulted rehabilitation research and yoga texts.

Measures

Primary outcome

The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) was the primary outcome and was administered 2,4, and 6 months post-treatment [18]. The measure includes two subscales; pain severity and pain interference, designed to quantify the severity of pain and the degree to which pain adversely impacts functioning. Pain severity is computed as the mean of four items rated on an 11-point Likert-type scale: (a) pain at its worst in the last 24 h, (b) pain at its least in the last 24 h, (c) pain on average, and (d) pain right now. Pain interference is computed as the average of nine items related to activities of daily living, including general activity, walking ability, mood, enjoyment of life, ability to concentrate, sleep, appetite, relations with others, and normal work functioning, each rated on an 11-point Likert-type scale. Consistent with the parent study [14], we also derived a BPI-SF “total score” by computing the mean of the pain severity and pain interference items.

Secondary outcomes

Fatigue

In accordance with standard guidelines [19], we used the 6-Minute Walk Test of functional exercise capacity to assess fatigue [20]. This measured how far participants could walk in 6 min around an indoor 32 m flat-surfaced track [19, 20].

Quality of life

The Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) was used to measure health-related quality of life [21]. The SF-36 comprises eight scales that assess physical functioning, physical health related role limitations, emotional health related role limitations, energy/fatigue, emotional wellbeing, social functioning, pain, and general health.

Depression

Depressive symptomatology was quantified using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-28 (HAM-D-28), an interviewer-administered questionnaire [22].

Autonomic symptom severity

Autonomic symptom severity was assessed using the 31-item self-report Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale (COMPASS-31) [23]. This measure assesses the frequency and severity of symptoms in a number of domains, including orthostatic intolerance, vasomotor, secretomotor, gastrointestinal, constipation, bladder, and pupillomotor. An example item from the gastrointestinal domain is, “In the past year, have you had a cramping or colicky abdominal pain?” and an example item from the pupillomotor domain is, “In the past year, without sunglasses or tinted glasses, has bright light bothered your eyes?”

Data analytic plan

Following the intention-to-treat principle, we used piecewise linear mixed models to examine long-term differences between yoga and CBT on BPI-SF pain severity, BPI-SF pain interference, and BPI-SF total score. To adjust for baseline to end-of-treatment effects, we coded two segments for time with a knot at 10 weeks. As a consequence of maximum likelihood estimation, linear mixed models are found to perform better than ordinary least squares approaches when data are missing completely at random or at random conditional on observed data [24,25,26]. In addition, due to their flexibility in partitioning variance, mixed models can better handle correlated residuals in longitudinal data [24,25,26].

Software packages from the R statistical computing environment were used to analyze the data. We used the tidyverse set of R packages to clean and structure the data, the nlme R package to estimate the mixed models [27], and the ggeffects R package to produce the figures. We determined the best fitting models by comparing plots of model-estimated trajectories to mean-based trajectories, the likelihood ratio test, and model assumption plots at levels 1 and 2 (see Table 2 for model specifications). In addition to adjusting for baseline to end-of-treatment (EOT) by group interactions, we adjusted for baseline depression, a well-established prognostic covariate of chronic pain [28], to reduce baseline differences in the outcome variables [29]. The final models were estimated with restricted maximum-likelihood estimation. We also performed a sensitivity analysis by examining a three-way interaction between EOT to 6 months follow-up (FU), group, and a binary variable denoting whether participants were missing any of the BPI-SF follow-up time period assessments [30, 31]. For significant interaction terms, the emmeans R package, which makes use of the delta method to compute standard errors, was used to derive 6-month post-treatment estimates averaged over the levels of the binary missing data variable [30,31,32] (see Supplementary Material for the R Notebooks). The data from the present analyses are available upon reasonable request to the authors.

Table 2 Longitudinal outcomes in pain severity, pain interfence and pain yotal: yoga versus CBT
Full size table

To derive a Cohen’s deffect size at each follow-up time period, we divided the difference in treatment means at each time point by the square root of the sum of variances of the random effects (i.e., intercept, slope, and residual variance components) [33]. Consistent with the parent trial, we quantified clinically significant improvement as a 15% decrease and as a 1-point decrease from baseline to 6 months post-treatment for pain severity and pain interference, respectively [34]. Clinically significant improvement on the 6-Minute Walk Test was defined as a 30.5 m change in walking distance from baseline to 6 months post-treatment [35]. Due to small sample sizes, Fisher’s exact test was used to examine between-group clinically significant improvements only among participants who completed the BPI at 6 months.

The models for fatigue, health-related quality of life, depression, and autonomic symptom severity were random intercept models with fixed effects for baseline to EOT, EOT to FU, group, and interaction terms between each of the time variables and group. Each model was adjusted for baseline average pain using the BPI-SF total score. Examination of assumption plots for each of the models showed adequate normality, independence, homoscedasticity, and linearity. Missing data per treatment arm and follow-up time period are shown in Table 3.

Results

Primary outcome

The model for BPI-SF pain severity showed a significant interaction between EOT to FU and treatment group, with a greater reduction in BPI-SF pain severity in the yoga group than in the CBT group (see Table 2; Fig. 1). The Cohen’s d effect size estimates at EOT, 2, 4, and 6 months post-treatment were 0.26, 0.04, 0.27, and 0.18, respectively (see Table 3 for other follow-up timepoints; n [yoga EOT] = 32; n [CBT EOT] = 19; n [yoga 6-month FU] = 29; n [CBT 6-month FU] = 18). Although our findings did not demonstrate between-group longitudinal differences in pain interference, the model demonstrated a significant within-group reduction in BPI-SF pain interference during the follow-up period for the yoga group (see Table 2; Fig. 1). In a secondary analysis, a separate model for the CBT group failed to show a reduction in BPI-SF pain interference during the follow-up time period (b = -0.004, se = 0.01, t(116) = -0.35, p = .724). Similarly, while the interaction term was not significant for BPI-SF total score, there was a statistically significant within-group effect for yoga during the follow-up period (see Table 2; Fig. 1). Using a separate model in a secondary analysis, we did not find within-group reductions in BPI-SF total score for the CBT group during the follow-up period (b = -0.001, se = 0.01, t(116) = -0.13, p = .899).

Table 3 Effect size estimates by group (Yoga vs. CBT) and follow-up time period for primary outcome measures
Full size table

Fisher’s exact tests to assess between-group differences in clinical improvement for both BPI-SF pain severity and BPI-SF pain interference were not significant, (OR = 0.48, CI[0.11,1.94], p = .356) and (OR = 0.34, CI[0.06,1.49], p = .125), respectively. Of the 29 participants in the yoga group who completed the pain severity measure at 6 months post-intervention, 13 (45%) met criteria for clinical improvement. For BPI-SF pain interference, 48% (13/27) of the participants in the yoga group met criteria for clinical improvement. In the CBT group, 5 of the 18 participants (28%) who completed the BPI-SF pain severity measure at 6 months post-treatment met criteria for clinical improvement, while 24% (4/17) met criteria for clinical improvement in pain interference.

Secondary outcomes

Our results did not show evidence of longitudinal group differences in walking distance, as measured by the 6-Minute Walk Test, from EOT to FU (b = -1.249, se = 0.821, t(83) = -1.52, p = .132, d = -3.05). However, the model showed a significant increase in walking distance from EOT to FU in the yoga group (b = 1.164, se = 0.508, t(83) = 2.29, p = .024; see Fig. 1). A secondary within-group analysis did not demonstrate an increase in walking distance in the CBT group (b = -0.088, se = 0.503, t [31] = -0.17, p = .863). Of the 24 participants in the yoga group who completed baseline and follow-up walking distance tests, 11 (46%) met criteria for clinical improvement, while 33% (5/15) in the CBT group met criteria for clinical improvement. However, Fisher’s exact test for clinical improvement was not significant (OR = 0.60, CI[0.12,2.69], p = .517). We did not find significance for depression (b = 0.127, p = .064, d = 0.04), autonomic symptom severity (b = 0.061, p = .708, d = -0.22), or quality of life (b = 0.193, p = .249, d = 0.26). Between-group effect size estimates, means, and standard deviations for each of the secondary measures are shown in Appendix 1.

Sensitivity analyses

The models with pain severity and pain interference entered as dependent variables did not show significant three-way interactions (BPI-SF pain severity: b = 0.056, t(306) = 1.912, p = .057; BPI-SF pain interference: b = 0.063, t(294) = 1.706, p = .089). However, our results revealed a significant three-way interaction for BPI-SF total score, with the score total decreasing less for CBT participants who were missing follow-up data (b = 0.067, se = 0.031, t(294) = 2.12, p = .035). The between-group difference in BPI-SF total score at 6 months post-treatment, averaged over the levels of the binary missing data variable, was − 1.27 (se = 0.582, p = .033). The estimated marginal mean for BPI-SF total score at 6 months post-treatment in the yoga group was 3.91 (se = 0.373, CI[3.16,4.65]), while the estimated marginal mean for the CBT group was 5.18 (se = 0.441, CI[4.30,6.06].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Model-derived trajectories for pain from end-of-treatment (EOT; week 10) to 6 months (mos) post-treatment for yoga and CBT; A BPI-SF Pain Severity; B BPI-SF Pain Interference; C BPI-SF Pain Total; y-axes do not start at 0; *p < .05

Full size image

Discussion

The aim of this study was to examine the long-term efficacy of yoga (vs. CBT) on symptoms of GWI, including pain, walking distance/fatigue, depression, autonomic symptom severity, and quality of life. During the 6-month follow-up period, our results from the BPI-SF showed evidence of reduced pain severity in the yoga group compared to the CBT group, with almost twice as many veterans meeting criteria for clinical improvement in pain severity in the yoga group than the CBT group at 6 months post-intervention (45% vs. 28%). We did not find between-group longitudinal differences in BPI-SF pain interference, BPI-SF total score, walking distance, depression, autonomic symptom severity, or quality of life. However, secondary within-group analyses showed long-term improvements in BPI-SF pain interference, BPI-SF total score, and walking distance in the yoga group but not in the CBT group. Our results failed to demonstrate long-term within-group treatment gains for CBT or yoga on measures of depression, autonomic symptom severity, or quality of life.

To our knowledge, this is the first RCT to report long-term benefits of yoga for GWI. A few other types of CIH interventions have shown similar effects. In one such trial, mindfulness-based stress reduction (vs. treatment as usual) was associated with greater reductions in pain, fatigue, depression, and cognitive errors in everyday tasks at 6 months post-intervention [36]. In a 3-month follow-up study, a sleep-focused mind-body intervention for symptoms of GWI showed sustained improvements in sleep, PTSD symptomatology, fatigue, and depression [37]. Importantly, though, a behavioral sleep intervention (CBT-I) without CIH components also demonstrated sustained 6-month reductions in pain interference, aberrant sleep, fatigue, cognitive failures, anxiety, and depression [38]. This promising result may be related to sleep as a core regulator of homeostatic functions [39]. Given the few trials reporting long-term outcomes for GWI, our interpretations on the use of CIH approaches in Veterans with GWI are preliminary. Nevertheless, our findings are consistent with the current VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of chronic multisymptom illness which recommends treating GWI with integrative health modalities, including yoga [9].

The pattern of results across multiple CIH studies is indicative of multisystemic healing and may be linked to the theoretical underpinnings of yoga and related CIH interventions. A core assumption underlying CIH approaches is the construct of holistic healing, which emphasizes the use of feedback processes between the mind and body to achieve greater homeostatic regulation [40, 41]. For example, a change in the quality of the breath is thought to impact the experience of thoughts in the mind, which interface with other physiological processes and attitudes towards life. A mechanism by which yoga and related holistic health approaches treat pain may be through enhanced interoceptive awareness, whereby practice-related improvements in noticing, distracting, worrying, attention regulation, body-listening, and trusting function to increase wellbeing and reduce pain and its sequelae [10]. Relatedly, increased proprioceptive awareness may also mediate the relationship between yoga practice and reduced pain by way of reducing muscle tension and improving posture [42]. Insofar that GWI is a multisystem illness associated with psychoneuroimmunologic dysregulation [43, 44], mind-body approaches that emphasize holistic healing may be uniquely poised to alleviate symptoms of GWI.

In our study, the yoga protocol emphasized the connection between movement and the breath, which may have increased relaxation and resulted in decreased chronic pain and fatigue, both of which are common in multisymptom illnesses [45, 40]. We also encouraged participants to attend to and adjust their posture throughout the day to improve circulation and decrease pain. The prior mindfulness-based stress reduction and mind-body sleep studies may have also demonstrated multisystemic improvements by way of targeting the breath/body connection [36, 37, 40]. While it was plausible that aerobic exercise, as a potent biopsychosocial intervention, would alleviate symptoms of GWI, prior findings have shown aerobic exercise has only modest efficacy in GWI [7]. This contradictory outcome may be due to less emphasis on the breath/body connection in exercise interventions. Future studies may benefit from integrating breath awareness practices into exercise routines to bolster the multisystemic effects of exercise and reduce GWI symptomatology.

Interestingly, consistent with prior results showing limited efficacy of CBT for GWI [7], our study also failed to show a long-term effect of CBT on symptoms of GWI. This observation may be understood by considering the distinction between bottom-up and top-down self-regulatory approaches to health. Bottom-up regulatory practices are characterized by a focus on the breath/body connection (e.g., yoga and meditation) whereas top-down regulatory practices are characterized by a focus on thoughts to affect emotions and bodily states (e.g., CBT) [46, 47] Compared to embodied yoga and meditation practices, top-down CBT techniques, such as cognitive reappraisal (i.e., challenging the initial reactive interpretation of distressing stimuli), possibly instill a sense of fighting or resisting the pain [48]. This could result in a dampened multisystemic effect of CBT on symptoms of GWI. On the other hand, the slowing of the breath in yoga and other contemplative practices is proposed to strengthen vagal activity, increase parasympathetic dominance, and cultivate a sense of safety in the mind/body [49]. This bottom-up generated relaxation response, echoing the construct of holistic healing, may function to improve the broad-ranging symptoms that characterize GWI by increasing compassionate acceptance of the pain [45].

While intriguing, our interpretations must be contextualized within the limitations of the present study. For example, there was greater dropout in the CBT group than in the yoga group. Even with the use of maximum likelihood estimation, the estimates may have been biased by differential attrition. Moreover, the clinically significant improvement and effect size statistics may have been biased by attrition. Due to the small sample size, the three-way interaction in the sensitivity analysis was likely underpowered. Although it revealed greater reductions in BPI-SF total score in the yoga group, as a conservative approach, we did not report this as a meaningful finding. To increase power and rectify common issues related sensitivity analyses, studies with larger sample sizes will be needed [30]. On the basis of our results, we encourage future GWI studies to consider the long-term benefits of treatment, and to examine if treatment gains are dependent on continued practice.

Conclusions

This is the first long-term follow-up study of yoga for treating the symptoms of GWI. Neither yoga nor CBT showed long-term improvements in depression, autonomic symptom severity, or quality of life. However, our results suggest that yoga, but not CBT, is associated with long-term (6-month) reductions in pain among Veterans living with GWI.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

GWI:

Gulf War Illness

CBT:

Cognitive-behavioral therapy

BPI-SF:

Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form)

SF-36:

Short Form Health Survey-36

HAM-D-28:

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-28

COMPASS-31:

Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale-31

EOT:

End-of-Treatment

FU:

Follow-up time point

m:

month

ID:

Participant identifier

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

References

  1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Gulf War and health: Volume 10: Update of health effects of serving in the Gulf War., 2016; https://doi.org/10.17226/21840.

  2. Iowa Persian Gulf Study Group. Self-reported illness and health status among Gulf War veterans: a population-based study. J Am Med Assoc. 1997;277:238–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Iversen A, Chalder T, Wessely S. Gulf War Illness: lessons from medically unexplained symptoms. Clin Psychol Rev. 2007;27(7):842–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuehn BM. Gulf War illness defined. JAMA. 2014;311(16):1603.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chester JE, Rowneki M, Van Doren W, Helmer DA. Progression of intervention-focused research for Gulf War illness. Military Med Res. 2019;6(1):31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Donta ST, Engel CC Jr, Collins JF, Baseman JB, Dever LL, Taylor T, Boardman KD, Kazis LE, Martin SE, Horney RA, Wiseman AL. Benefits and harms of doxycycline treatment for Gulf War veterans’ illnesses: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(2):85–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Donta ST, Clauw DJ, Engel CC Jr, Guarino P, Peduzzi P, Williams DA, Skinner JS, Barkhuizen A, Taylor T, Kazis LE, Sogg S. Cognitive behavioral therapy and aerobic exercise for Gulf War veterans’ illnesses: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;289(11):1396–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cook DB, Stegner AJ, Ellingson LD. Exercise alters pain sensitivity in Gulf War veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain. J Pain. 2010;11(8):764–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. VA/DoD. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Chronic Multisymptom Illness. 2021. Retrieved from https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/MR/cmi/VADoDCMICPG508.pdf.

  10. Mehling WE, Daubenmier J, Price CJ, Acree M, Bartmess E, Stewart AL. Self-reported interoceptive awareness in primary care patients with past or current low back pain. J pain Res. 2013;6:403–18.

  11. Curtis K, Osadchuk A, Katz J. An eight-week yoga intervention is associated with improvements in pain, psychological functioning and mindfulness, and changes in cortisol levels in women with fibromyalgia. J pain Res. 2011;4:189–201.

  12. Kocyigit BF, Sagtaganov Z, Yessirkepov M. The effectiveness of yoga as a form of exercise in the management of rheumatic diseases. Rheumatol Int. 2023;43(5):795–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Doulatabad SN, Nooreyan K, Doulatabad AN, Noubandegani ZM. The effects of pranayama, hatha and raja yoga on physical pain and the quality of life of women with multiple sclerosis. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2013;10(1):49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bayley PJ, Schulz-Heik RJ, Cho R, Mathersul D, Collery L, Shankar K, Ashford JW, Jennings JS, Tang J, Wong MS, Avery TJ. Yoga is effective in treating symptoms of Gulf War illness: a randomized clinical trial. J Psychiatr Res. 2021;143:563–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fukuda K, Nisenbaum R, Stewart G, Thompson WW, Robin L, Washko RM, Noah DL, Barrett DH, Randall B, Herwaldt BL, Mawle AC. Chronic multisymptom illness affecting Air Force veterans of the Gulf War. JAMA. 1998;280(11):981–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Melzack R. The short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Pain. 1987;30(2):191–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mahoney L, Collery L, Shankar K, Majmundar MR, Bayley PJ. Development of a yoga treatment protocol for Gulf War Illness (GWI) in veterans. Global Adv Health Med. 2022;11:66-05.16.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Keller S, Bann CM, Dodd SL, Schein J, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CS. Validity of the brief pain inventory for use in documenting the outcomes of patients with noncancer pain. Clin J Pain. 2004;20(5):309–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:111–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Butland RJ, Pang JA, Gross ER, Woodcock AA, Geddes DM. Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease. Br Med J (Clinical Res ed). 1982;284(6329):1607.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kazis LE, Miller DR, Skinner KM, Lee A, Ren XS, Clark JA, Rogers WH, Spiro A III, Selim A, Linzer M, Payne SM. Patient-reported measures of health: the Veterans Health Study. J Ambul Care Manag. 2004;27(1):70–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960;23(1):56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sletten DM, Suarez GA, Low PA, Mandrekar J, Singer W. COMPASS 31: a refined and abbreviated Composite Autonomic Symptom Score. In Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2012;87(12):1196–201 Elsevier.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoffman L. Longitudinal analysis: modeling within-person fluctuation and change.1st Edition. New York: Routledge; 2015. p. 30.

  25. Bosker R, Snijders TA. Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. 2nd Edition. Los Angeles: Sage; 2011. p. 1–368.

  26. Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS. Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2002.

  27. Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D. and R Core Team (2018) nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R Package Version 3.1-137. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme.

  28. Tunks ER, Crook J, Weir R. Epidemiology of chronic pain with psychological comorbidity: prevalence, risk, course, and prognosis. Can J Psychiatry. 2008;53(4):224–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kahan BC, Jairath V, Doré CJ, Morris TP. The risks and rewards of covariate adjustment in randomized trials: an assessment of 12 outcomes from 8 studies. Trials. 2014;15(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hedeker D, Gibbons RD. Application of random-effects pattern-mixture models for missing data in longitudinal studies. Psychol Methods. 1997;2(1):64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Enders CK. Applied Missing Data Analysis (Methodology in the Social Sciences). New York: Guilford Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lenth R, Buerkner P, Herve M, Love J, Riebl H, Singmann H. Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means, R package version 1.4. 3.01. https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/emmeans/index.html.

  33. Westfall J, Kenny DA, Judd CM. Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014;143(5):2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, Beaton D, Cleeland CS, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Kerns RD, Ader DN, Brandenburg N. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J pain. 2008;9(2):105–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bohannon RW, Crouch R. Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6-minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017;23(2):377–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kearney DJ, Simpson TL, Malte CA, Felleman B, Martinez ME, Hunt SC. Mindfulness-based stress reduction in addition to usual care is associated with improvements in pain, fatigue, and cognitive failures among veterans with gulf war illness. Am J Med. 2016;129(2):204–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nakamura Y, Lipschitz DL, Donaldson GW, Kida Y, Williams SL, Landward R, Glover DW, West G, Tuteja AK. Investigating clinical benefits of a novel sleep-focused mind-body program on Gulf War illness symptoms: a randomized controlled trial. Psychosom Med. 2017;79(6):706–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chao LL, Kanady JC, Crocker N, Straus LD, Hlavin J, Metzler TJ, Maguen S, Neylan TC. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia in veterans with gulf war illness: results from a randomized controlled trial. Life Sci. 2021;279:119147.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Winkelman JW. How to identify and fix sleep problems: better sleep, better mental health. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020;77(1):99–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Khalsa SB, Cohen L, McCall T, Telles S. The principles and practice of yoga in health care. East Lothian: Handspring Publishing; 2016.

  41. Tiwari GK. Yoga and mental health: an underexplored relationship. Int J Indian Psychol. 2016;4(1):19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cramer H, Lauche R, Hohmann C, Lüdtke R, Haller H, Michalsen A, Langhorst J, Dobos G. Randomized-controlled trial comparing yoga and home-based exercise for chronic neck pain. Clin J Pain. 2013;29(3):216–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nkiliza A, Joshi U, Evans JE, Ait-Ghezala G, Parks M, Crawford F, Mullan M, Abdullah L. Adaptive immune responses associated with the central nervous system pathology of Gulf War illness. Neurosci Insights. 2021;16:26331055211018458.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Blanchard M, Molina-Vicenty HD, Stein PK, Li X, Karlinsky J, Alpern R, Reda DJ, Toomey R. Medical correlates of chronic multisymptom illness in Gulf War veterans. Am J Med. 2019;132(4):510–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Dunn KD. A review of the literature examining the physiological processes underlying the therapeutic benefits of Hatha yoga. Adv Mind-body Med. 2008;23(3):10–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Vanderhasselt MA, Ottaviani C. Combining top-down and bottom-up interventions targeting the vagus nerve to increase resilience. Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews. 2022;132:725–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nakamura H, Tawatsuji Y, Fang S, Matsui T. Explanation of emotion regulation mechanism of mindfulness using a brain function model. Neural Netw. 2021;138:198–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sagula D, Rice KG. The effectiveness of mindfulness training on the grieving process and emotional well-being of chronic pain patients. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2004;11:333–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Gerritsen RJ, Band GP. Breath of life: the respiratory vagal stimulation model of contemplative activity. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:397.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. David A. Williams for making available the CBT materials from an earlier study7.

Funding

This work was supported by a CDMRP/DoD Gulf War Illness Research Program Innovative Treatment Evaluation Award [grant number 11488016].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. War Related Illness and Injury Study Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA

    Santiago Allende, Danielle C. Mathersul, Jay R. Schulz-Heik, Timothy J. Avery, Louise Mahoney & Peter J. Bayley

  2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA

    Santiago Allende & Peter J. Bayley

  3. School of Psychology, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia

    Danielle C. Mathersul

  4. Centre for Molecular Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics, Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia

    Danielle C. Mathersul

  5. Peninsula Behavioral Health, CA, Palo Alto, 94306, USA

    Jay R. Schulz-Heik

  6. Department of Veterans Affairs, Peninsula Vet Center, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, United States of America

    Timothy J. Avery

Authors
  1. Santiago Allende
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Danielle C. Mathersul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jay R. Schulz-Heik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Timothy J. Avery
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Louise Mahoney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Peter J. Bayley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Peter J. Bayley: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing - review & editing. Santiago Allende: Formal analysis, Writing - original draft. Danielle Mathersul: Investigation, Writing - review & editing. Jay R. Schulz-Heik: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, review & editing. Timothy J. Avery: Investigation, Methodology, Writing - review & editing. Louise Mahoney: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing - review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santiago Allende.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the latest version of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Stanford University Institutional Review Board (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02378025). All participants provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allende, S., Mathersul, D.C., Schulz-Heik, J.R. et al. Yoga is effective for treating chronic pain in veterans with Gulf War Illness at long-term follow-up. BMC Complement Med Ther 23, 319 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04145-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04145-y

Keywords

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies

ISSN: 2662-7671

Contact us