Skip to main content
Download PDF

In vitro antimicrobial efficacy of Cassia alata (Linn.) leaves, stem, and root extracts against cellulitis causative agent Staphylococcus aureus

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies volume 23, Article number: 85 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cellulitis is a common skin disease encountered in medical emergencies in hospitals. It can be treated using a combination of antibiotics therapy; however, the causative agent Staphylococcus aureus has been reported to develop resistance towards the currently used antibiotics. Therefore, the search for more alternative herbal origin antimicrobial agents is critical. Aim: In this study, maceration and Soxhlet extraction of the whole plant of Cassia alata Linn. (leaves, roots, and stem) were performed using four solvents with different polarities, namely n-hexane, ethyl acetate, ethanol and distilled water. The crude extracts were screened using agar well diffusion, colorimetric broth microdilution, grid culture and bacterial growth curve analysis against Staphylococcus aureus. The phytochemicals in the crude extracts were identified using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS).

Results

Agar-well diffusion analysis revealed that extraction using ethyl acetate showed the largest inhibition zone with an average diameter of 15.30 mm (root Soxhlet extract) followed by 14.70 mm (leaf Soxhlet extract) and 13.70 mm (root maceration extract). The lowest minimum inhibitory and minimum bactericidal concentration in root Soxhlet extract using ethyl acetate was 0.313 and 0.625 µg µL−1, respectively. Our study proved that crude extract of the plant suppressed the growth of S. aureus as evidenced from a significant regression extension (p < 0.06, p = 0.00003) of lag phase for 6 h after the treatment with increased concentration. Based on the GC–MS analysis, 88 phytochemicals consist of fatty acids, esters, alkanes, phenols, fatty alcohols, sesquiterpenoids and macrocycle that possibly contributed to the antimicrobial properties were identified, 32 of which were previously characterized for their antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities.

Conclusion

Ethyl acetate crude extract was better than the other investigated solvents. The root and stem of C. alata showed significant antimicrobial efficacy against S. aureus in this study. The remaining 56 out of 88 phytochemicals of the plant should be intensively studied for more medicinal uses.

Peer Review reports

Background

Cellulitis is commonly defined as an acute, spreading pyogenic inflammatory condition involving the dermis and subcutaneous tissues caused by bacterial infection [1,2,3]. It is, however; not contagious despite the rapid spreading and pyogenic nature of cellulitis [4]. Cellulitis is a general medical emergency in hospitals because it has caused more than 600,000 hospitalizations, about 3.7% of total emergency admissions in the US since 2010; the severity varies from mild to life-threatening [5, 6]. The Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) suggests that Staphylococcus aureus is the main culprit of cellulitis based on combined data from the studies of specimen cultures on punch biopsies, needle aspirates, and serological studies [7, 8].

S. aureus is a coagulase-positive, non-motile, and non-spore-forming facultative gram-positive anaerobe that colonize half of the adult population. Approximately 20 to 30% of them are permanent while the other 30% are just transient carriers [9]. It increases the risks of cellulitis by two to ten times [10]. When a staphylococcal infection is suspected or the aetiology that leads to cellulitis infection is unknown, patients are usually treated first with intravenous flucloxacillin and amoxicillin [11, 12]. In most cases, penicillin remains the first-choice drug for S. aureus infections [9]. However, it has been reported to develop resistance towards penicillin [13, 14], linezolid or daptomycin [15], glycopeptides, vancomycin, and teicoplanin [16] and significant resistance against the current generation antibiotics is anticipated in the near future.

The resistant of bacteria towards antimicrobial agents, increase in treatment costs and the adverse effects of synthetic drugs have necessitated the development of alternative, safe, efficient, and cost-effective natural medicines from plants [17, 18] and microbes [19,20,21]. Natural drugs are relatively cheaper; they have fewer side effects, better patient tolerance, and are acceptable due to a long history of use [22, 23]. The essential oils derived from medicinal plants are potential sources of antimicrobial agents against multiple-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria. These oils consist of phytochemicals such as terpenoids that can easily diffuse across cell membranes to induce biological reactions [24]. It reduces the opportunity for bacteria to develop resistance as the bacteria can be targeted via several mechanisms [25]. Besides, the essential oils also confer synergetic effects when used in combination with less effective antibiotics [26]. Hence, researchers are increasingly drawing their attention to medicinal plants for new leads to develop better solutions against MDR bacteria [27].

Cassia alata (Linn.) is known as the candle shrub by the locals in Sarawak, Borneo. It is a valuable plant, particularly among traditional practitioners in Malaysia. The locals use the plant as a prescriptive medicine to treat ringworm infection [22]. C. alata has been characterized by various bioactive compounds, including alkaloids, phenolics, flavonoids, tannin, steroids, and triterpenoids [28]. For example, kaempferol, anthraquinone, hexadecanoic acid methyl ester, hexadecanoic acid, and kaempferol-3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside were identified in leaves, while ziganein, apigenin, and 1,3,8-trihydroxy-2-methyl-anthraquinone were found in stem [28]. These phytochemicals possess exciting biological and pharmacological properties such as antimicrobial, antifungal [29, 30], antioxidants [31], antiseptic [32], anti-inflammatory [22], analgesic [33], and anti-hyperglycaemic [17, 34]. Previous studies have also shown the efficacy of the extracts and phytochemicals from C. alata against some clinical isolates of MDR bacteria [35, 36], which attracted researchers’ attention to explore the full potential of the plant as antibacterial and anti-oxidative agents. Hence, the main objective of this study was to determine the chemical compositions and antimicrobial properties of crude extracts from C. alata (Linn.) for potential application in the pharmaceutical sector against the cellulitis agent, S. aureus.

Methods

Plant material

Whole plants of C. alata Linn. were collected in June 2018 from a site located near Kampung Sungai Bako Jaya (N 1°40′25.5" E 110°27′12.8"), Malaysia. Botanical identification of the collected plant materials was done by Associate Professor Dr Mohd Said Saad of Plant Genetics Unit, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia. The voucher specimen was deposited at the Phyto-medicinal Herbarium of Institute Bioscience under the accession number SK179/02.

Sample collection

C. alata plants (leaves, roots, and stems) were collected in sterile polyethene bags to avoid external contamination. The samples were labelled and transported directly to the laboratory in a chilled icebox.

Sample processing

The leaves, roots, and stems were processed as described by Odeyemi et al. [37] with modifications. First, the samples were sorted according to appearance and condition, while those in a spoilt state were discarded. It was followed by surface disinfection of selected samples by soaking in 2% sodium hypochlorite (Merck, Germany, 6–14% active chlorine) for 10 min, followed by 70% ethanol (Merck, Germany, EMSURE® ACS) for a minute and then rinsed at least five times with sterile distilled water. The samples were then oven-dried at 40 °C for 72 h until a constant weight was obtained. After that, the dried samples were finely ground into small particle sizes (< 0.2 mm) and then transferred into sterile containers for storage in a dry condition.

Maceration and Soxhlet extraction

Maceration was performed according to Yeo et al. [38] and Azwanida [39] with modifications. Four extraction solvents with different polarities were selected for the maceration process, namely n-hexane (Hex) (Merck, Germany, EMSURE® ACS), ethyl acetate (EA) (Merck, Germany, EMSURE® ACS), undenatured absolute ethanol (EtOH) (Systerm, Malaysia, ChemAR 99.8%), and sterile distilled water (dH2O). Approximately 20.0 g of ground samples were weighed and transferred to the screw-capped amber conical flasks. These samples were then soaked in the respective solvent in the ratio of 1 (sample): 10 (solvent) for 48 h and constantly mixed at room temperature on the platform shaker. After that, the sample-solvent mixtures were filtered and collected in sterile amber chemical bottles. A new batch of respective solvents was added to filtered samples for another round of extraction. These filtration and extraction processes were repeated four times to allow maximum recovery of bioactive compounds from the plant materials.

Soxhlet extraction was performed according to Redfern et al. [40] with modifications. Hex, EA, EtOH and dH2O were applied in the extraction process. Approximately 10.0 g of ground samples were weighed and transferred into cellulose extraction thimbles inside the Soxhlet extraction chamber. 200 mL of extraction solvent was added to the extractor flask and heated using an isomantle heater. These Soxhlet extractions were repeated for 20 cycles at 50 °C. After the extraction process, extraction solvents were collected in amber chemical bottles before rotary evaporation.

Rotary evaporation

Crude extracts were dried in a rotary evaporator (Hei-VAP, Heidolph, Germany) to remove the excess of extraction solvents. Supplementary 1 lays the conditions of rotary evaporation for the respective extraction solvent. These crude extracts were rotary evaporated until a minute volume was left inside the flask. The leftover was then transferred into a pre-weighed sterile beaker and the flask was rinsed using a small volume of extraction solvent to allow maximum extract recovery. The beakers were dried at room temperature in the fume hood. These crude extracts were kept in a freezer at -20 °C for storage and further study.

Solvent reconstitution

The extract colloids were reconstituted by using 100% (v/v) dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Merck, Germany, EMSURE® ACS). Several concentrations of plant extracts were calculated and prepared.

Standardization of bacteria culture

A clinical strain of S. aureus was obtained from the Faculty of Medical and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. Unless stated otherwise, the antimicrobial assay was carried out using Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB) (Oxoid, UK). The bacterial culture was incubated at 37 °C for 18 h to obtain bacteria culture in the log phase and then standardized to 0.5 MacFarland at 600 nm.

Agar well diffusion assay

The agar well diffusion assay was performed according to Magaldi et al. [41] and Valgas et al. [42] with slight modifications. Muller-Hinton agar (MHA) (Oxoid, UK) were equally divided into four different sections and labelled with types, extraction methods and concentrations of plant extract tested. Standardized S. aureus from overnight MHB culture was lawn cultured using a sterile cotton swab and then allowed to dry for 15 min. After that, 7 mm bores were punched through the seeded MHA and 50 μL of extracts with adjusted concentrations (1, 1.5, 2, 10 gL−1) were carefully transferred into the bores using a pipette. 50 μL of 100% (v/v) DMSO was used as the negative control. The agar plates were allowed to acclimate at room temperature for 15 min before being incubated at 37 °C for 18 h. The growth inhibition zones developed around the bores were measured in diameter using a pair of callipers. The assay was performed in triplicate, and the antimicrobial activities of the crude extracts were expressed as the mean of inhibition diameters in millimetres (mm).

MIC using colorimetric broth microdilution assay

Broth microdilution assay was performed using sterile 96-wells round-bottom microtiter plates (TPP, Switzerland) according to Salvat et al. [43] and CLSI [44] standard with modifications. 100 μL of sterile MHB was dispensed using a multi-channel pipette into wells from rows B to H for columns 1 to 4, columns 6 to 9; rows A to H for columns 10 and 12. 200 μL of four prepared crude extracts with 10.0 gL−1 concentration were dispensed into row A, columns 1 to 4 for assays and columns 6 to 9 as the extract control. After that, 100 μL of crude extracts from row A were transferred and serially diluted to 2-fold from rows A to H for columns 1 to 4 and columns 6 to 9. It was followed by dispensing 200 μL of 100% (v/v) DMSO into the well in row A column 12 and serially diluted to 2-fold from rows A to H. For microbial inoculum, 0.5 MacFarland standardized S. aureus was further diluted 1:150 to obtain the bacteria concentration at 1 × 106 CFU mL−1. Finally, 100 μL of the standardized bacteria inoculum was dispensed into the wells of rows A to H for columns 1 to 4 for assay and 12 for bacteria growth control. The same volume of sterile MHB was dispensed into wells from columns 6 to 9 for the extract control. The microtiter plates were read at 600 nm using an M965 microplate reader (Metertech Inc., Taiwan) after a minute of high-speed shaking before being incubated at 37 °C for 18 h.

After incubation, the plates were read again with the same set of conditions. Then, 20 µL of 0.45 µm syringe filtered 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5- diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) (AMRESCO, Ohio, USA, ultra-pure grade) solution (5.0 gL−1 in PBS) was subsequently added to all the 96-wells. The microtiter plates were wrapped with aluminium foil and incubated again at 37 °C for an hour. Purple formazan crystal was observed at the bottom of the wells shortly after the incubation. Three-quarters of the uncoloured MTT solution was carefully removed using a pipette without disturbing the formazan crystals. Next, the wells were washed using sterile PBS solution and the microtiter plates were placed on an orbital shaker at 120 rpm for three hours to settle down the formazan crystal. These processes were repeated twice to allow better of unbound MTT from the wells. After that, approximately 100 μL of formazan solubilizing agent (0.5% SDS, 36 mM HCL acidified isopropanol) was dispensed into all the 96-wells and mixed properly to dissolve all the formazan crystals. The microtiter plates were read at 540 nm after high-speed shaking for three minutes. The reduction of bacteria was calculated in percentage according to the formula shown below:

$$\mathrm{Percentage}\;\mathrm{of}\;\mathrm{bacteria}\;\mathrm{reduction}\;\left(\%\right)\;=\;\left[\frac{\left(Treated\;-\;blank\right)\;-\;\left(Control\;-\;blank\right)}{\left(Control\;-\;blank\right)}\right]\;\times\;100\%$$

Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) using grid culture

MBC was performed under a standardized set of conditions as described in document M26-A [44]. The MBC was determined by subculturing from wells after broth microdilution assay to a non-selective agar, and negative microbial growth was yielded. Briefly, 3 µL of extract-bacteria mixture from the assay wells of broth microdilution assay after 18 h of incubation was pipetted onto the MHA plate that was gridded and labelled. Six extract concentrations were tested in triplicate: 5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.625, 0.313 and 0.156 µg µL−1. The inoculated MHA plates were acclimatised to room temperature for about 15 min before incubating at 37 °C for 18 h. The growth of S. aureus in the spaces was observed and the results were tabulated.

Bacterial growth curve analysis

Bacterial growth curve analysis was performed according to Husain et al. [45] with modifications to determine the effects of crude extract on the bacterial growth curve of S. aureus. The analysis was conducted in the 96-wells round-bottom microtiter plates (TPP, Switzerland), and the absorbance was read using a microtiter plate reader. The identified MIC of the extracts against S. aureus from previous colorimetric broth microdilution assay was applied in this test. Sterile MHB containing the extracts was prepared at a final concentration of 0.5, 1 and 2 × MIC on a microtiter plate for testing and extract background control while sterile MHB without extract served as the blank and bacteria growth control. The S. aureus inoculum was prepared according to the previous broth microdilution assay. After that, one volume of standardized bacteria was added to the extract and bacteria growth control while a similar volume of sterile MHB was dispensed into extract background control and blank. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for varied time intervals (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 18 h) and then read at 600 nm wavelength after a minute of high-speed shaking. Analysis was conducted in triplicate, and the bacterial growth curves expressed in the mean of turbidity where the absorbance was plotted against time intervals.

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)

GC–MS was performed as described by Samling et al. [46] with modifications. The analysis was conducted on Shimadzu GC–MS model QP 2010 PLUS (Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with a single quadrupoles mass analyser and a non-polar GC BPX-5 cross-linked column (5% Phenyl Polysilphenylene-siloxane) of 30 m length, 0.25 mm internal diameter and 0.25 µm film thickness. The temperature of the GC oven was initially programmed at 50 °C for 1 min then ramped to 240 °C at the rate of 8.5 °C min-1 and held for 10 min. Injector and detector temperatures were programmed at 260 °C. The interface temperature was set at 260 °C and the inert ion source was programmed at 200 °C while 70 eV of electron impact ionization energy was used with a scan rate and mass range of 909 s/spectra and 40–500 m/z. Helium gas (99.999% purity) was used as a carrier gas with a flow rate of 1.0 mL min-1. The injection volume was 1 µL with a splitting ratio of 20:1. The interpretation of mass-spectrum was conducted using a mass spectral library search in the National Institute Standard and Technology (NIST) database incorporated with the GC–MS data system for the potential identification of compounds. Name, molecular mass, and structure of the components in the crude extracts were analysed and recorded.

Results

Agar-well diffusion assay

Table 1 shows the average diameter of inhibition zones produced by C. alata crude extracts from both maceration and Soxhlet extraction tested in several concentrations with different plant’s parts and extraction solvents. The results showed that ethyl acetate extracts from both maceration and Soxhlet extraction generally exhibited stronger antimicrobial activities (p < 0.06, p = 0.0001) compared to the other extracts. The largest inhibition zone was observed in REA Soxhlet extract with an average diameter of 15.30 mm at 10 µg µL−1 extract concentration, followed by LEA Soxhlet (14.70 mm) and REA maceration (13.30 mm). These findings implied that ethyl acetate could be a better solvent than the others in isolating the phytochemicals responsible for antimicrobial activities towards S. aureus from C. alata. Generally, crude extracts of C. alata demonstrated a concentration-dependant antimicrobial activity because most of the extracts exhibited larger size of inhibition zones at higher concentrations and the sizes decreased with lower concentration. When the extract concentration was gradually reduced to 1 µg µL−1, there were only three extracts that remained susceptible towards S. aureus (p < 0.06, p = 0.01). Those extracts were SEA maceration extract (9.00 mm), REA maceration extract (9.70 mm) and REA Soxhlet extract (9.00 mm). Except for LdH2O Soxhlet extract at 10 µg µL−1 concentrations, most of the water extracts did not show clear inhibition zones. Figure 1 shows the agar well diffusion assay among leaves, roots, and stem parts of C. alata against S. aureus from both maceration and Soxhlet extraction at 10 µg µL−1 concentration.

Table 1 Average diameter of inhibition zones (mm) produced by C. alata crude extracts tested against Staphylococcus aureus
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Agar well diffusion assay of the roots, stem, and leaves extract of C. alata from both maceration and Soxhlet extraction tested at 10 µg µL−1 concentration, where (A, B, C, D, E, F) represents Stem Soxhlet extract, Leaves Soxhlet extract, Root Soxhlet extract, Stem maceration extract, Leaves maceration extract, Root maceration extract, respectively. G represents Negative control-100% DMSO and positive controls-Rifampin, Gentamicin and Streptomycin antibiotic disks. Solvents used: Hex, n-hexane; EA, ethyl acetate; EtOH, undenatured ethanol & DH2O, sterile distilled water

Full size image

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC)

Table 2 shows the MIC, MBC endpoints and MBC/MIC ratio of crude extracts among leaves, roots and stem of C. alata from both maceration and Soxhlet extraction and the reduction percentage of bacteria identified at MIC endpoints. Figure 2 shows the overnight growth of S. aureus culture with the MBC values of the crude extracts against S. aureus. The maceration and Soxhlet extraction of stem, leaves and roots of C. alata using n-hexane, ethyl acetate and ethanol solvent produced most bactericidal agents (MBC/MIC ≤ 4), except for LEA maceration (MBC/MIC = 8) and LHex Soxhlet (MBC/MIC > 4) that are bacteriostatic agents. From the colorimetric broth microdilution assay, ethyl acetate extracts of C. alata with MIC endpoints ranging from 0.313 to 0.625 µg µL−1 showed strong antagonistic activities (p < 0.06, p = 0.00008) compared to the other extracts. Among the extracts tested, REA Soxhlet extract had the lowest MIC value, with 0.313 µg µL−1, while the other extracts ranged between 0.625 µg µL−1 to 1.25 µg µL−1. Almost all water extracts tested did not show any inhibition activity except for LdH2O Soxhlet extract at 1.25 µg µL−1 extract concentration. The REA soxhlet extract had exhibited the lowest MBC value with 0.625 µg µL−1 while the other extracts ranged between 1.25 to more than 5.00 µg µL−1. Almost all water-based crude extracts had higher MBC values, exceeding 5.00 µg µL−1.

Table 2 Minimum Inhibitory Concentration and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration of C. alata against Staphylococcus aureus
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

MBCs of crude extracts among stem parts, leaves and roots of C. alata from both maceration and Soxhlet extraction against S. aureus. Spaces without visible bacterial growth indicate bactericidal effect, where (A, B, C, D, E, F) represents Stem Soxhlet extract, Leaves Soxhlet extract, Root Soxhlet extract, Stem maceration extract, Leaves maceration extract, Root maceration extract, respectively

Full size image

Bacterial growth curve analysis

Further analysis of bacterial growth curve was performed for REA Soxhlet, SEA maceration, SEA Soxhlet, and REA maceration extracts that showed a large inhibition zone with low MIC and MBC endpoints and ratios. Figure 3 shows the growth curves of S. aureus treated with several MICs of REA Soxhlet, SEA maceration, SEA Soxhlet and REA maceration extract at 600 nm wavelength across 18 h of incubation. From the growth curves, the untreated S. aureus (orange lines, Fig. 3) managed to reach the log phase after 2 to 4 h of incubation at 37 °C. It started to grow exponentially afterwards and recorded an optical density (OD) of 0.424 after 18 h of incubation. However, the treated S. aureus generally recorded a proportional extension of lag phase for about 2 to 6 h and reduction in bacterial growth rate after the extract treatment with increasing extract concentration. At 0.25 × MIC concentration (red lines, Fig. 3), the SEA maceration, REA maceration and REA Soxhlet extracts-treated S. aureus showed a minor increment after 4 h of incubation, while those treated with SEA Soxhlet had a major increment in OD within a similar incubation. Meanwhile, S. aureus treated with the 1 × MIC extract concentration (blue lines, Fig. 3) of REA Soxhlet, SEA maceration and SEA Soxhlet extract only showed slight or no increment after 8 h of incubation, while those treated with REA Soxhlet extract had an OD decline after 4 h. The regression study between extract concentration and the optical densities of treated S. aureus was significant (p < 0.06, p = 0.00003). The increase in OD indicates that the crude extracts were unable to further induce the bacteriostatic or bactericidal effects due to depleting antimicrobial phytochemicals in the extracts, confirming the concentration dependency.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Growth curves of S. aureus treated with several MICs of SEA maceration, SEA Soxhlet, REA maceration and REA Soxhlet extract at 600 nm wavelength across 18 h of incubation where (A, B, C, D) represents SEA maceration, SEA Soxhlet, REA maceration, REA Soxhlet, respectively. Solvents used: EA, ethyl acetate. S and R represents stem and root

Full size image

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)

REA Soxhlet, SEA maceration, SEA Soxhlet, and REA maceration extract were subjected to GC–MS analysis to identify the chemical constituents of the extracts. A total number of 88 individual phytochemical compounds were identified and 32 of them were readily known from previous studies to have antimicrobial, antioxidant, or anti-inflammatory properties. The individual compounds were identified based on mass spectra fragmentation patterns using the NIST14 library database (Table 3).

Table 3 Phytochemicals identified in C. alata (stem, leaves, roots) extracts that potentially use to treat cellulitis
Full size table

The SEA maceration had 50 major phytochemicals identified from the GC–MS, however, only 19 were previously characterized. Among the 19 phytochemicals, SEA maceration extract shared six phytochemicals in common and the remaining were found only specialized to the extract. N-hexadecanoic acid (12.28%), 9, 12-octadecadienoic acid (Z, Z)- (11.65%), octadecanoic acid (3.01%), 1-eicosanol (0.73%), pentadecanoic acid (0.55%) and neophytadiene (0.44%) were common, while stigmasterol (5.72%), γ-sitosterol (5.03%), β-sitosterol acetate (3.95%), eicosanoic acid (1.07%), octadecane (1.14%), dibutyl phthalate (0.99%), phenol, 3, 5-bis (1, 1-dimethylethyl)- (0.76%), n-nonadecanol-1 (0.64%), tetradecane (0.63%), 1,2-benzene dicarboxylic acid, bis(2-methylpropyl) ester (0.53%), bicyclo[3.1.1]heptan-3-ol,6,6-dimethyl-2-methylene-,[1S-(1α, 3α, 5α)] (0.45%), tetratetracontane (0.43%) and cycloheptasiloxane, tetradecamethyl- (0.43%) were found only in SEA maceration extract.

SEA Soxhlet had 17 major phytochemicals identified, however, only ten were previously characterized. Six were in common, namely 9, 12-octadecadienoic acid (Z, Z)- (38%), n-hexadecanoic acid (28.79%), octadecanoic acid (6.68%), pentadecanoic acid (0.92%), tetradecanoic acid (0.85%) and 1-eicosanol (0.78%). Meanwhile, tetracontane (8.86%), palmitoleic acid (0.99%), heptadecanoic acid (0.59%), 9,10-anthracenedione, 1, 8-dihydroxy-3-methyl- (0.58%) were the four phytochemicals that were found only in SEA Soxhlet extract.

Of the 17 phytochemicals identified in REA maceration from the GC–MS, only four were previously characterized, namely hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester (22.18%), 9-octadecenoic acid (Z)-, methyl ester (8.56%) and neophytadiene (1.98%). Cyclohexasiloxane, dodecamethyl- (2.12%) was the only phytochemical found explicitly to REA maceration.

There were 30 phytochemicals identified in REA Soxhlet, 12 of which were previously characterized and seven phytochemicals were found in common [n-hexadecanoic acid (34.34%), 9, 12-octadecadienoic acid (Z, Z)- (10.07%), hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester (5.44%), 9-octadecenoic acid (Z)-, methyl ester (5.12%), neophytadiene (3.57%), octadecanoic acid (3.16%), tetradecanoic acid (0.58%)]. Meanwhile, phytol (6.66%), squalene (1.43%), 3, 7, 11, 15-tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol (1.29%), n-heptadecanol-1 (0.86%) and 2-pentadecanone, 6, 10, 14-trimethyl- (0.57%) were the five explicit phytochemicals found in the REA Soxhlet extract.

Discussion

Previous research has shown that the ethanolic and methanolic extracts of C. alata had stronger antimicrobial activities against S. aureus in agar-well or agar-disc diffusion assay compared to chloroform and ethyl acetate extracts [81, 82]. These differences in antimicrobial activities from different solvents and plant parts were also observed elsewhere [82, 83]. Hence, the present study expects significant antimicrobial activities from ethanol extracts. However, it was the extracts from ethyl acetate exhibited stronger antimicrobial activities. It implies that ethyl acetate may be a better solvent than others in extracting the phytochemicals responsible for antimicrobial activities against S. aureus from C. alata. Ethyl acetate is capable of extracting and dissolving active principal phytochemicals with semi-polar properties from plants, such as alkaloids, sterols, terpenoids, flavonoids, aglycons and glycosides [84]. The phytochemicals may be more soluble and potent when extracted using ethyl acetate compared to the other solvents [85]. Therefore, stronger antimicrobial activities demonstrated by ethyl acetate extract compared with other extraction solvents may be attributed to the presence of impurities or ashes that are more soluble in other solvents due to dilution effect of the active phytochemicals in the extracts [85].

The crude extracts of C. alata also demonstrated a concentration-dependant antimicrobial activity. These findings were in line with previously reported findings [85,86,87]. When the extract concentration was gradually reduced to 1 µg µL−1, only three extracts remained susceptible to S. aureus (p < 0.06, p = 0.01). Previous research has determined that the phytochemical distribution within C. alata varied between plant parts [82, 83, 85]. For example, the roots may accumulate more flavonoid quercetin, naringenin and kaempferol [42], while anthraquinones, flavonoids, quinines, and sterols in leaves [88]. This could explain why ethyl acetate root extract is more potent and exhibited stronger antimicrobial activities against S. aureus at all concentration levels compared to the leaves and stem extracts of same solvent [85].

On the contrary, most of the water extracts did not show clear inhibition zones at 10 µg µL−1 concentrations except for the LdH2O Soxhlet extract. These findings suggest that water extracts of C. alata did not possess any antimicrobial properties or inhibition effects against S. aureus [22]. Interestingly, previous research by Somchit et al. [30] and Timothy et al. [87] revealed the presence of certain phytochemicals in LdH2O Soxhlet extract that could inhibit the growth of S. aureus. However, findings from the present study contradict the indication that water extracts of C. alata shared the same potency as the other extracts tested in this study [89, 90]. The differences observed in antimicrobial activities of extracts from the same plant part tested are common in phytochemical research. This is because the concentration of plant constituents may vary from one geographical location to another, depending on the age of the plant, differences in topographical factors, soil nutrients, extraction methods as well as the method used for antimicrobial study [91].

From broth microdilution assay, the ethyl acetate extracts of C. alata demonstrated strong antagonistic activities. Similar findings were also reported by Wikaningtyas and Sukandar [92, 93], indicating that the ethyl acetate extracts could exhibit stronger antimicrobial activities against S. aureus compared to the other extracts of C. alata. The bacteria reduction rates of S. aureus at the MIC endpoints were higher than 90%, thereby, validating the MIC endpoint values of those extracts. For crude extracts with a bacteria reduction rate above 100%, the actual MIC endpoint values could be slightly higher than the values stated but that intermediate concentration was not determined. These findings substantiated the preliminary results from agar-well diffusion assay that most water extracts either only showed inhibition effects at very high concentrations or no inhibition effects at all towards S. aureus. However, these results contradicted previous findings where water extracts of C. alata were shown to be capable of inhibiting the growth of S. aureus and were just as effective as the other extracts [87, 91]. These differences in the antimicrobial activities could be attributed to variations in phytochemical concentrations that were active and potent against S. aureus, as well as water-soluble impurities from the extraction process [85, 91].

The extracts are only considered as bactericidal agents if the ratio MBC/MIC is less than or equal to 4, while those greater than 4 as bacteriostatic agent [89, 94]. The MBC/MIC ratio of crude extracts ranged between 1 and 4, except for LEA maceration extract with the ratio of 8. The MBC/MIC ratios of water-based extracts cannot be calculated due to the ambiguous values of MIC and MBC (except for LdH2O Soxhlet), indicating that water-based extracts possessed no or weak antimicrobial effects against S. aureus. Therefore, it can be inferred that most of the C. alata crude extracts could be utilised as the bactericidal agent while LEA maceration and LHex soxhlet as the bacteriostatic agent.

Bacterial growth curve analysis is an influential tool that can provide comprehensive information about the pharmacodynamics of an antibacterial agent that cannot be obtained simply through the endpoints assay such as the MIC and MBC [90, 95]. The primary focus of the analysis is the elongation of the lag phase, which is the time required for the bacterial culture to enter the exponential phase after the extract treatment, because the length of the lag phase directly depends on the bacteria’s growing condition [96]. The lag phase is also a critical window to protect the bacteria from antimicrobial stress and promote bacteria regrowth after the removal of antimicrobial agents [97]. Theophel et al. [98] emphasize the importance of the lag phase as the key stage for bacteria to develop strategies in resisting the killing by antimicrobial agents [98]. The researchers further highlighted the duration of lag phases as a more meaningful indicator of dose-dependent antibiotic inhibition. Hence, an in-depth understanding of how antimicrobial agents affect the lag phase of bacterium is essential.

In this study, S. aureus treated with C. alata extracts showed differences in the growth rate at the exponential phase (Fig. 3). For example, S. aureus treated with 0.25 × MIC concentration of SEA maceration extract showed an approximately 54.4% decrease in growth rate at 8 to 12 h of incubation compared with the bacteria control. At the same time, those treated with 0.5 × MIC concentration of SEA maceration extract showed approximately 93.2% of reduction for the same incubating period. Similar observations were also noted in other extracts with the increase of extract concentration. Meanwhile, S. aureus treated with REA Soxhlet extract at 0.25 × MIC concentration recorded higher optical density values after 18 h of incubation compared with the bacteria control. These observations could be due to the low inoculum concentration of REA Soxhlet extract (0.078 µg µL−1) and the promoting effect of bacterial regrowth upon the removal of antimicrobial agents after the extended lag phases [48, 99]. Based on the bacterial growth curve analysis, the period required for the extracts to show full potential efficacy against S. aureus was determined as 6 h of incubation. Hence, we suggest that S. aureus be treated with another concentration level at the 6th hour to maintain low OD readings.

There were 88 individual phytochemical compounds identified from the GC–MS analysis and 32 were readily known from previous research to have antimicrobial, antioxidant, or anti-inflammatory properties. According to the chromatogram, the largest peak area (38.00%) was recorded by 9, 12-octadecadienoic acid (Z, Z)- (linoleic acid) in SEA Soxhlet extract. It is a plant glycoside with anti-inflammatory, antieczemic and inhibitory action against some bacteria species [51, 74]. However, despite the bacterial inhibitory action, most research effort has primarily focused on its anti-inflammatory properties [51, 52, 100]. In this study, the anti-inflammatory properties of 9, 12-octadecadienoic acid (Z, Z)- is a favourable property because it could reduce the inflammation symptoms caused by cellulitis.

Apart from that, n-hexadecanoic acid, octadecanoic acid, 9,12-octadecadienoic acid (Z, Z)- and neophytadiene were identified as the ubiquitous phytochemicals found in the extracts of C. alata except for REA maceration and SEA Soxhlet. Both extracts were found deficient in either one phytochemical from the list. Relatively higher concentrations of n-hexadecanoic acid were detected in REA Soxhlet with a peak area of 34.4%, followed by SEA Soxhlet (28.7%) and SEA maceration (12.28%). n-Hexadecanoic acid is also known as palmitic acid, which is the most common saturated fatty acid found in animals, plants and microorganisms with antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidants properties [47, 101]. Meanwhile, the highest octadecanoic acid concentration was recorded in SEA Soxhlet with a peak area of 6.68%, followed by REA Soxhlet (3.16%) and SEA maceration (3.01%). Octadecanoic acid is one of the commonest saturated fatty acids and is commonly known by the name stearic acid. It exists as a glycerol ester and is found abundantly in most animals (up to 30%) and plant fats (typically < 5%) [102]. It was reported to exhibit antibacterial, antifungal and antitumour activities [61].

The REA maceration extract was devoid of n-hexadecanoic acid and octadecanoic acid, but it did contain 22.18% of hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester, which was found explicitly in the root extracts of C. alata. The REA Soxhlet also contained about 5.44% of hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester. The methyl ester of fatty acid has been reported to exhibit antioxidant and potent antimicrobial activities against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [48, 103]. A study showed that hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester exhibited antibacterial potency against the clinical strain of S. aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae [99]. The antimicrobial activity of fatty acids is regulated by their structures, morphologies, carbon-chain length functions, and the presence, number, positioning, and orientation of double bonds [104]. Many organisms rely on fatty acid methyl ester as a defence mechanism against bacterial infection, with the mode of action being the bacteria’s cell membrane. In addition, the fatty acid methyl ester also interferes with cellular energy production, inhibits enzyme activity, and causes direct bacterial cell lysis [105]. The safety and activity of the fatty acid methyl ester make it a promising antimicrobial agent.

Although the phytochemicals have been previously identified and characterized in the extracts, 56 phytochemicals whose biological properties and functions remain unknown. Some of these phytochemicals occurred in relatively higher concentrations in the extracts. For example, 3-propylglutaric acid (3.04%) in SEA Soxhlet extract; 4,22-cholestadien-3-one (7.73%) and γ-sitostenone (13.21%) in SEA maceration extract; henicosanal (13.60%), methyl stearate (5.96%) and hexadecanal (4.83%) in REA maceration extract; and methyl 10-trans,12-cis-octadecadienoate (6.76%) and heptadecanolide (6.38%) in REA Soxhlet extract. The phytochemicals that contributed to the antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties of C. alata in this study should be further investigated before formulating an effective natural drug against the cellulitis causing agent, S. aureus.

Conclusion

The ethyl acetate extracts of C. alata exhibited strong antimicrobial activities against the clinical strain of S. aureus. The extracts from Soxhlet extraction also exhibited stronger antimicrobial activities compared to maceration extraction. REA Soxhlet extract showed significant inhibition effects towards S. aureus, followed by SEA Soxhlet, SEA maceration and REA maceration extract of C. alata. Extracts derived from n-hexane, ethyl acetate and ethanol can be utilised as the bactericidal agents (MBC/MIC ≤ 4), except for LHex Soxhlet and LEA maceration extracts. Different elongation patterns of bacterial lag phases and reduction in growth rate were observed during the growth curve analysis. There was a significant regression extension (p < 0.06, p = 0.00003) of the lag phase for 2 to 6 h after the extract treatment with the increase of extract concentration. Based on the GC–MS analysis, a total of 88 phytochemicals that constitute phenolics, steroids, fatty acids, alcoholics, esters, and alkane hydrocarbons were detected, 32 of which were previously characterized for their antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

[Supplementary 1] Temperature, rotations speed, pressure designed for rotary evaporation for each respective extraction solvents.

[Supplementary 2] GC–MS chromatogram of REA maceration, REA Soxhlet, SEA maceration, and SEA Soxhlet extract.

Abbreviations

Hex:

N-Hexane

EA:

Ethyl acetate

EtOH:

Undenatured absolute ethanol

dH2O:

Sterile distilled water

L:

Leave

R:

Root

S:

Stem

References

  1. Swartz MN. Cellulitis. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(9):904–12. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp031807.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Joseph J, Abraham S, Soman A, Mathew LK, Ganga SV, Vijayan V. Cellulitis: a bacterial skin infection, their causes, diagnosis and treatment. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2014;3(7):308–26.

    Google Scholar 

  3. US FDA. Guidance for industry. Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: Developing drugs for treatment. Silver Spring (MD). USA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER); 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gardner E. South West Essex Community Services (SWECS) adult primary care cellulitis guideline. 3rd ed. UK: National Health Services; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Björnsdóttir S, Gottfredsson M, Thórisdóttir AS, Gunnarsson GB, Rıkardsdóttir H, Kristjánsson M, Hilmarsdóttir I. Risk factors for acute cellulitis of the lower limb: a prospective case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(10):1416–22. https://doi.org/10.1086/497127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Phoenix G, Das S, Joshi M. Diagnosis and management of cellulitis. Br Med J. 2012;345:e4955. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gunderson CG, Martinello RA. A systematic review of bacteremias in cellulitis and erysipelas. J Infect. 2012;64(2):148–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2011.11.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, Dellinger EP, Goldstein EJC, Gorbach SL, Hirschmann JV, Kaplan SL, Montoya JG, Wade JC. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(2):147–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor TA, Unakal CG. Staphylococcus aureus. 2018. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441868/. PMID: 28722898. Accessed 11 Nov 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sakr A, Brégeon F, Mege JL, Rolain JM, Blin O. Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization: an update on mechanisms, epidemiology, risk factors and subsequent infections. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2419. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02419.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. CREST. ISBN 1–903982–12-X register. Guidelines on the management of cellulitis in adults. Belfast, UK: Clinical Resource Efficiency Support Team; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Török E, Conlon CP. Skin and soft tissue infections. Medicine. 2005;33(4):84–8. https://doi.org/10.1383/medc.33.4.84.64357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deurenberg RH, Stobberingh EE. The evolution of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Genet Evol. 2008;8(6):747–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2008.07.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lacey K, Geoghegan J, McLoughlin R. The role of Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors in skin infection and their potential as vaccine antigens. Pathogens. 2016;5(1):22. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens5010022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gu B, Kelesidis T, Tsiodras S, Hindler J, Humphries RM. The emerging problem of linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;68(1):4–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dks354.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Fair RJ, Tor Y. Antibiotics and bacterial resistance in the 21st century. Perspect Medicin Chem. 2014;6:25–64. https://doi.org/10.4137/PMC.S14459.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ogunwande IA, Flamini G, Cioni PL, Omikorede O, Azeez RA, Ayodele AA, Kamil YO. Aromatic plants growing in Nigeria: Essential oil constituents of Cassia alata (Linn.) Roxb and Helianthus annuus L. Rec Nat Prod. 2010;4(4):211–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Aslam B, Wang W, Arshad MI, Khurshid M, Muzammil S, Rasool MH, Nisar MA, Alvi RF, Aslam MA, Qamar MU, Salamat M, Baloch Z. Antibiotic resistance: a rundown of a global crisis. Infect Drug Resist. 2018;11:1645–58. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S173867.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lihan S, Chai SL, Ahmad I, Sinang FM, Ng KH, Awang ASAH. Antimicrobial producing microbes isolated from soil samples collected from Nanga Merit forest in Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo. Eur J Exp Biol. 2014;4(1):494–501.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lihan S, Yue KC, Ng KH, Wasli ME. Screening for antimicrobial activity of fungi in soil samples collected from Kubah National Park. Int J Sci Technol Res. 2014;3(2):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wong C, Proksch P, Lee TT, Lihan S, Mujahid A, Muller M. Isolation, identification and screening of antimicrobial properties of the marine-derived endophytic fungi from marine brown seaweed. Microbiol Indones. 2015;9(4):141–9. https://doi.org/10.5454/mi.9.4.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. El-Mahmood AM, Doughari JH. Phytochemical screening and antibacterial evaluation of the leaf and root extracts of Cassia alata Linn. Afr J Pharm Pharmacol. 2008;2(7):124–9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tabassum N, Hamdani M. Plants used to treat skin diseases. Pharmacogn Rev. 2014;8(15):52–60. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-7847.125531.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Naveed R, Hussain I, Tawab A, Tariq M, Rahman M, Hameed S, Mahmood MS, Siddique AB, Iqbal M. Antimicrobial activity of the bioactive components of essential oils from Pakistani spices against Salmonella and other multi-drug resistant bacteria. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013;13(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-13-265.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bonifácio BV, dos Santos Ramos MA, Da Silva PB, Bauab TM. Antimicrobial activity of natural products against Helicobacter pylori: a review. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2014;13(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-014-0054-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pajohi MRTH, Farshid AA, Hadian MJ. Synergistic antibacterial activity of the essential oil of Cuminum cyminum L seed and nisin in a food model. J Appl Microbiol. 2011;110:943–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.04946.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Saravanakumar P, Thangapandiyan S, Dharanipriya R, Gowri SS. Phytochemical analysis and antimicrobial activity of Ocimum tenuiflorum (Tulsi), a known Indian folk medicinal plant. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2018;53:24–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fatmawati S, Purnomo AS, Bakar MFA. Chemical constituents, usage and pharmacological activity of Cassia alata. Heliyon. 2020;6(7):e04396.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kayser O, Arndt SK. Antimicrobial activity of some Ziziphus species used in traditional medicine. Pharm Pharmacol Lett. 2000;10(1):38–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Somchit M, Reezal I, Nur IE, Mutalib A. In vitro antimicrobial activity of ethanol and water extracts of Cassia alata. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003;84(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-8741(02)00146-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wegwu MO, Ayalogu EO, Sule OJ. Antioxidant protective effects of Cassia alata in rats exposed to carbon tetrachloride. J Appl Sci Environ Manag. 2005;9(3):77–80. https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v9i3.17356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Esimone CO, Nworu CS, Ekong US, Okereke B. Evaluation of the antiseptic properties of Cassia alata-based herbal soap. Internet J Altern Med. 2007;6(1):117–24.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Deshpande S, Kewatkar SM, Paithankar VV. In-vitro antioxidant activity of different f of roots of Cassia auriculata Linn. Drug Invention Today. 2013;5(2):164–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dit.2013.05.006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Goyal M, Nagori BP, Sasmal D. Review on ethnomedicinal uses, pharmacological activity and phytochemical constituents of Ziziphus mauritiana (Z. jujuba Lam., non Mill). Spatula DD. 2012;2(2):107–16. https://doi.org/10.5455/spatula.20120422080614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hazni H, Ahmad N, Hitotsuyanagi Y, Takeya K, Choo CY. Phytochemical constituents from Cassia alata with inhibition against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Planta Med. 2008;74(15):1802–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Swain SS, Padhy RN. In vitro antibacterial efficacy of plants used by an Indian aboriginal tribe against pathogenic bacteria isolated from clinical samples. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2015;10(4):379–90.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Odeyemi S, Afolayan A, Bradley G. Phytochemical analysis and antioxidant activities of Albuca bracteata Jacq. and Albuca setosa Jacq. bulb extracts used for the management of diabetes in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Asian Pac J Tropical Biomed. 2017;7(6):577–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtb.2017.05.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yeo YL, Chia YY, Lee CH, Sow HS, Yap WS. Effectiveness of maceration periods with different extraction solvents on in-vitro antimicrobial activity from fruit of Momordica charantia L. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2014;4(10):016–20. https://doi.org/10.7324/JAPS.2014.40104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Azwanida NN. A review on the extraction methods use in medicinal plants, principle, strength and limitation. Med Aromat Plants. 2015;4(3):196. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0412.1000196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Redfern J, Kinninmonth M, Burdass D, Verran J. Using soxhlet ethanol extraction to produce and test plant material (essential oils) for their antimicrobial properties. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2014;15(1):45–6. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v15i1.656.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Magaldi S, Mata-Essayag S, Hartung de Capriles C, Perez C, Colella MT, Olaizola C, Ontiveros Y. Well diffusion for antifungal susceptibility testing. Int J Infect Dis. 2004;8(1):39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2003.03.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Valgas C, de Souza SM, Smânia EFA, Smânia A Jr. Screening methods to determine antibacterial activity of natural products. Braz J Microbiol. 2007;38(2):369–80. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-83822007000200034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Salvat A, Antonnacci L, Fortunato RH, Suarez EY, Godoy HM. Screening of some plants from Northern Argentina for their antimicrobial activity. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2001;32(5):293–7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00923.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. CLSI. CLSI document M07-A9. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard-Ninth Edition. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Husain FM, Ahmad I, Al-thubiani AS, Abulreesh HH, AlHazza IM, Aqil F. Leaf extracts of Mangifera indica L. inhibit quorum sensing–regulated production of virulence factors and biofilm in test bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:727. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00727.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Samling BA, Assim Z, Tong WY, Leong CR, Ab Rashid S, Kamal NN, Muhamad M, Tan WN. Cynometra cauliflora L.: An indigenous tropical fruit tree in Malaysia bearing essential oils and their biological activities. Arab J Chem. 2021;14(9):103302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Siswadi S, Saragih GS. Phytochemical analysis of bioactive compounds in ethanolic extract of Sterculia quadrifida R. Br. In AIP Conference Proceedings 2021 May 25 (Vol. 2353, No. 1, p. 030098). New York: AIP Publishing.

  48. Zayed MZ, Wu A, Sallam SM. Comparative phytochemical constituents of Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) leaves, fruits, stem barks, and wood branches grown in Egypt using GC-MS method coupled with multivariate statistical approaches. BioResour. 2019;14(1):996–1013.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Sharma RK, Goel A. Identification of phytoconstituents in Lawsonia inermis Linn. leaves extract by GC-MS and their antibacterial potential. Pharmacogn J. 2018;10(6):1101–8.

  50. Alghamdi AI, Ababutain IM. Phytochemical screening and antibacterial activity of Eucalyptus camaldulensis’s leaves and bark extracts. Asian J Sci Res. 2019;12(2):202–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Bose R, Kumar MS, Manivel A, Mohan SC. Chemical constituents of Sauropus androgynus and evaluation of its antioxidant activity. Res J Phytochem. 2018;12(1):7–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Pamila UA, Karpagam S. GC-MS Analysis of Ethanolic Extract of Alternanthera philoxeroides and Alternanthera bettzickiana from India. World Res J Biol Biol Sci. 2017;2:005–11.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Renji Nair R, Gangaprasad A. GC-MS analysis of methanolic stem extract of Gynochthodes Ridsdalei, Razafim and B Bremer, an endemic, endangered medicinal plant of Southern Western Ghats. Int J Curr Pharm Res. 2018;5(2):64–7.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Abubakar MN, Majinda RR. GC-MS analysis and preliminary antimicrobial activity of Albizia adianthifolia (Schumach) and Pterocarpus angolensis (DC). Medicines. 2016;3(1):3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Karthikeyan V, Baskaran A, Rajasekaran CS. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of ethanolic extracts of Barleria acuminata Nees. Int J Pharmacol Res. 2016;6(2):55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Senthil J, Rameashkannan MV, Mani P. Phytochemical profiling of ethanolic leaves extract of Ipomoea sepiaria (Koenig Ex. Roxb). Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol. 2016;5(3):3140–7.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Swamy MK, Arumugam G, Kaur R, Ghasemzadeh A, Yusoff MM, Sinniah UR. GC-MS based metabolite profiling, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of different solvent extracts of Malaysian Plectranthus amboinicus leaves. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2017;2017:1517683.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Mathi PA, Nikhil KU, Das SN, Roy PA, Bokka VR, Botlagunta MA. Evaluation of in vitroanticancer activity and GC-MS analysis from leaf Sophora interrupta Bedd. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015;7:303–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Mohammed GJ, Al-Jassani MJ, Hameed IH. Anti-bacterial, antifungal activity and chemical analysis of Punica grantanum (pomegranate peel) using GC-MS and FTIR spectroscopy. Int J Pharmacogn Phytochem Res. 2016;8(3):480–94.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sahi NM. Evaluation of insecticidal activity of bioactive compounds from Eucalyptus citriodora against Tribolium castaneum. Int J Pharmacogn Phytochem Res. 2016;8(8):1256–70.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sunita A, Ganesh K, Sonam M. Screening and evaluation of bioactive components of Cenchrus ciliaris L. by GC-MS analysis. Int Res J Pharm. 2017;8(6):69–76.

  62. Babu A, Anand D, Saravanan P. Phytochemical analysis Ficus arnottiana (Miq.) Miq. leaf extract using GC-MS analysis. Int J Pharmacogn Phytochem Res. 2017;9:775–9.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Prajna PS, Bhat PR, Kumar KN. Identification of bioactive compounds in Loeseneriella arnottiana wight root by GC-MS analysis. World J Pharma Res. 2016;5(4):1559–69.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Murugan K, Iyer VV. Antioxidant activity and gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric analysis of extracts of the marine algae, Caulerpa peltata and Padina gymnospora. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2014;76(6):548.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Raman BV, Samuel LA, Saradhi MP, Rao BN, Krishna NV, Sudhakar M, Radhakrishnan TM. Antibacterial, antioxidant activity and GC-MS analysis of Eupatorium odoratum. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2012;5(2):99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Mujeeb F, Bajpai P, Pathak N. Phytochemical evaluation, antimicrobial activity, and determination of bioactive components from leaves of Aegle marmelos. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:497606.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Akpuaka A, Ekwenchi MM, Dashak DA, Dildar A. Biological activities of characterized isolates of n-hexane extract of Azadirachta indica A. Juss (Neem) leaves. Nat Sci. 2013;11(5):141–7.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Sunita A, Manju S. Phytochemical examination and GC-MS analysis of methanol and ethyl acetate extract of root and stem of Gisekia phamaceoides Linn.(Molluginaceae) from Thar desert, Rajasthan, India. Res J Pharma Biol Chem Sci. 2017;8(4):168–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Arora S, Kumar G. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) determination of bioactive constituents from the methanolic and ethyl acetate extract of Cenchrus setigerus Vahl (Poaceae). Antiseptic. 2017;2:0–31.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Arora S, Meena S. Bio-activity in Flowers of Sarcostemma viminale (L.) R. Br.-An Endangered Medicinal Plant from Thar Desert of Rajasthan (India). Pharmacogn J. 2018;10(5):871–4.

  71. Shajib M, Akter S, Ahmed T, Imam MZ. Antinociceptive and neuropharmacological activities of methanol extract of Phoenix sylvestris fruit pulp. Front Pharmacol. 2015;6:212.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Fatima N, Rizwan M, Hobani YH, Marwan AE, Kumar BV, Sunosi RA, Abdulwahab SI, Areeshi MY, Alvi A, Oriaby ME. Gas chromatography/Mass spectroscopy analysis of Catha edulis Forsk, A psycho stimulant revealed potent solvent dependent antimicrobial activity. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2017;6(2):197–204.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Rani J, Giri RS. Screening of bio-active compounds and anticancer activity of Punica granatum L. World J Sci Res. 2016;1(3):06–13.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Zheng CJ, Yoo JS, Lee TG, Cho HY, Kim YH, Kim WG. Fatty acid synthesis is a target for antibacterial activity of unsaturated fatty acids. FEBS Lett. 2005;579(23):5157–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Nguyen MT, Hanzelmann D, Härtner T, Peschel A, Götz F. Skin-specific unsaturated fatty acids boost the Staphylococcus aureus innate immune response. Infect Immun. 2016;84(1):205–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Yakubu EO, Otitoju O, Onwuka J. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of aqueous extract of Daniellia oliveri stem bark. Pharmaceutica Analytica Acta. 2017;8(568):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Rajashyamala G, Elango V. Identification of bioactive components and its biological activities of Evolvulus alsinoides linn: a GC-MS study. Int J Chem Stud. 2015;3(1):41–4.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Ali A, Javaid A, Shoaib A. GC-MS analysis and antifungal activity of methanolic root extract of Chenopodium album against Sclerotium rolfsii. Planta Daninha. 2017;35:e017164713.

  79. Godwin A, Akinpelu BA, Makinde AM, Aderogba MA, Oyedapo OO. Identification of n-hexane fraction constituents of Archidium ohioense (Schimp. Ex Mull) extract using GC-MS technique. J Pharm Res Int. 2015;6:366–75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Febronia BF, Santhi G. In vitro efficacy of Piper betle leaf extract against Rhizoctonia solani causing damping off disease of chilli. Int J Pharm Res Scholars. 2017;6(1):109–15.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Ehiowemwenguan G, Inetianbor JE, Yakubu JM. Antimicrobial qualities of Senna alata. IOSR J Pharm Biol Sci. 2014;9(2):47–52. https://doi.org/10.9790/3008-09244752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Alam MT, Karim MM, Khan SN. Antibacterial activity of different organic extracts of Achyranthes aspera and Cassia alata. J Sci Res. 2009;1(2):393–8. https://doi.org/10.3329/jsr.v1i2.2298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Sharma P, Pandey D, Rizvi AF, Gupta AK. Antimicrobial activity of Cassia alata from Raipur region against clinical and MTCC isolates. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2015;4(1):330–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Widyawati PS, Budianta TDW, Kusuma FA, Wijaya EL. Difference of solvent polarity to phytochemical content and antioxidant activity of Pluchea indicia less leaves extracts. Int J Pharmacogn Phytochem Res. 2014;6(4):850–5.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Otto RB, Ameso S, Onegi B. Assessment of antibacterial activity of crude leaf and root extracts of Cassia alata against Neisseria gonorrhea. Afr Health Sci. 2014;14(4):840–8. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v14i4.11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Alalor CA, Igwilo CI, Jeroh E. Evaluation of the antibacterial properties of aqueous and methanol extracts of Cassia alata. J Pharm Allied Health Sci. 2012;2(2):40–6. https://doi.org/10.3923/jpahs.2012.40.46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Timothy SY, Wazis CH, Bwala AY, Bashir HJ, Rhoda AS. Comparative study on the effects of aqueous and ethanol leaf extracts of Cassia alata Linn on some pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Int Res J Pharm. 2012;3(8):125–7.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Karthika C, Mohamed RK, Manivannan S. Phytochemical analysis and evaluation of antimicrobial potential of Senna alata Linn. leaves extract. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2016;9(2):253–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Keepers TR, Gomez M, Celeri C, Nichols WW, Krause KM. Bactericidal activity, absence of serum effect, and time-kill kinetics of ceftazidime-avibactam against β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(9):5297–305. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02894-14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Pfaller MA, Sheehan DJ, Rex JH. Determination of fungicidal activities against yeasts and molds: Lessons learned from bactericidal testing and the need for standardization. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17(2):268–80. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.17.2.268-280.2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Doughari JH. Phytochemicals: extraction methods, basic structures and mode of action as potential chemotherapeutic agents. In: Rao V, editor. Phytochemicals-A global perspective of their role in nutrition and health. Rijeka, Croatia: INTECH Open Access Publisher; 2012. p. 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Wikaningtyas P, Sukandar EY. The antibacterial activity study of Senna alata leaf extract and fraction towards MRSA (methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and its mode of action. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015;4(4):126–33.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Wikaningtyas P, Sukandar EY. Evaluation of the combined antibacterial activity of Kaempferia pandurata rhizome and Senna alata leaves against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2016;9(3):112–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Appiah T, Boakye YD, Agyare C. Antimicrobial activities and time-kill kinetics of extracts of selected Ghanaian mushrooms. Evid Based Complement Altern Med. 2017;2017:4534350. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4534350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Schaper KJ, Schubert S, Dalhoff A. Kinetics and quantification of antibacterial effects of beta-lactams, macrolides, and quinolones against gram-positive and gram-negative RTI pathogens. Infection. 2005;33(2):3–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Mukherjee I, Ghosh A, Bhadury P, De P. Leucine-based polymer architecture-induced antimicrobial properties and bacterial cell morphology switching. ACS Omega. 2018;3(1):769–80. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b01674.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Li B, Qiu Y, Shi H, Yin H. The importance of lag time extension in determining bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Analyst. 2016;141(10):3059–67. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5an02649k.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Theophel K, Schacht VJ, Schlüter M, Schnell S, Stingu CS, Schaumann R, Bunge M. The importance of growth kinetic analysis in determining bacterial susceptibility against antibiotics and silver nanoparticles. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:544. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00544.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Shaaban MT, Ghaly MF, Fahmi SM. Antibacterial activities of hexadecanoic acid methyl ester and green-synthesized silver nanoparticles against multidrug-resistant bacteria. J Basic Microbiol. 2021;61(6):557–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Lin TK, Zhong L, Santiago JL. Anti-inflammatory and skin barrier repair effects of topical application of some plant oils. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(1):70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Desbois AP, Smith VJ. Antibacterial free fatty acids: activities, mechanisms of action and biotechnological potential. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85(6):1629–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Beare-Rogers JL, Dieffenbacher A, Holm JV. Lexicon of lipid nutrition (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem. 2001;73(4):685–744.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Davoodbasha M, Edachery B, Nooruddin T, Lee SY, Kim JW. An evidence of C16 fatty acid methyl esters extracted from microalga for effective antimicrobial and antioxidant property. Microb Pathog. 2018;115:233–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Zhen Z, Xi TF, Zheng YF. Surface modification by natural biopolymer coatings on magnesium alloys for biomedical applications. In Surface Modification of Magnesium and Its Alloys for Biomedical Applications. United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing; 2015. p. 301–33.

  105. Suresh A, Praveenkumar R, Thangaraj R, Oscar FL, Baldev E, Dhanasekaran D, Thajuddin N. Microalgal fatty acid methyl ester a new source of bioactive compounds with antimicrobial activity. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2014;4:S979–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Universiti Putra Malaysia and Universiti Malaysia Sarawak for the collaborative research and fundings provided. The authors would like to acknowledge Associate Professor Dr Mohd Said Saad from Plant Genetics Unit, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia for the identification of the plant specimen used in this study.

Funding

This research was funded by the Tun Zaidi Chair (grant no. F07/TZC/1915/2019 to Samuel Lihan) and Putra Grant, Universiti Putra Malaysia (grant no. GP/2020/9692700 to Sui Sien Leong). The article processing charge was funded by the research management centre of Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal Science and Fishery, Faculty of Agricultural Science and Forestry, Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus, Nyabau Road, 97008, Bintulu, Sarawak, Malaysia

    Seng Chiew Toh & Sui Sien Leong

  2. Institute of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia

    Samuel Lihan

  3. Faculty of Resource Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia

    Scholastica Ramih Bunya

  4. Institute of Ecosystem Science Borneo, Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus, Nyabau Road, 97008, Bintulu, Sarawak, Malaysia

    Sui Sien Leong

Authors
  1. Seng Chiew Toh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samuel Lihan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Scholastica Ramih Bunya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sui Sien Leong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SCT: Methodology, Conceptualization, Writing–original draft, Writing—review & editing. SL, SSL: Supervision, Funding acquisition, Project administration. SRB: Investigation. SSL: Writing—review & editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sui Sien Leong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable. Cassia alata Linn. is not under protection or regulation in Malaysia. The collection and handling of plant materials were in compliance with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation. The experiments on plant extract were compiled and approved by the Research Ethical Committee Number: UPM-Eth − /CA-M04/20–16, of Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia. Plant is freely available and used by local people as food and there is no constraint by the authority to collect the plant.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Toh, S.C., Lihan, S., Bunya, S.R. et al. In vitro antimicrobial efficacy of Cassia alata (Linn.) leaves, stem, and root extracts against cellulitis causative agent Staphylococcus aureus. BMC Complement Med Ther 23, 85 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-03914-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-03914-z

Keywords

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies

ISSN: 2662-7671

Contact us