Skip to main content
Download PDF

Naringenin and cryptotanshinone shift the immune response towards Th1 and modulate T regulatory cells via JAK2/STAT3 pathway in breast cancer

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies volume 22, Article number: 145 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Use of natural products has been proposed as an efficient method in modulation of immune system and treatment of cancers. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of cryptotanshinone (CPT), naringenin, and their combination in modulating the immune response towards Th1 cells and the involvement of JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway in these effects.

Methods

Mouse models of delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) were produced and treated with naringenin and CPT. The proliferation of spleen cells were assessed by Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) assay. Flowcytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests were employed to evaluate subpopulation of T-lymphocytes and the levels of cytokines, respectively. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway was analyzed by Western blotting.

Results

We showed higher DTH, increased lymphocyte proliferation, decreased tumor growth and reduced JAK2/STAT3 phosphorylation in mice treated with naringenin and CPT. Moreover, a significant decline in the production of IL-4 and an upsurge in the production of IFN-γ by splenocytes were observed. Additionally, the population of intra-tumor CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells was significantly lower in naringenin + CPT treated animals than that in controls.

Conclusion

Naringenin-CPT combination could exert immunomodulatory effects, suggesting this combination as a novel complementary therapeutic regimen for breast cancer.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Cancer is the leading cause of death in the world and its incidence and mortality are rapidly growing [1]. Globally, breast cancer is the main cause of cancer-related deaths in females [2, 3]. Without changes in the current therapeutic systems, the number of females diagnosed with breast cancer would approximately double to 3.2 million by 2030 [3]. Primarily, surgical resection, chemotherapy, and fractionated radiotherapy are used to treat cancer. However, the effectiveness of some therapies is constrained by treatment-associated side effects, drug resistance, and off-target effects. Furthermore, conventional treatments do not typically eliminate metastatic cancer cells; so, there is a high probability of recurrence [4]. Therefore, more effective adjuvant therapies may reduce the burden of this disease.

Natural and herbal products are alternatives for prevention and adjuvant therapy of cancer with fewer side effects [5]. Naringenin, a member of the flavanone family, is abundantly present in citrus fruits. Recent studies have shown that naringenin has anti-carcinogenic, anti-oxidant, anti-atherogenic, and potential immune-modulating activities [6].

A traditional Chinese herb, known as Salvia Miltiorrhiza Bunge (Danshen), has been widely applied for the treatment of many diseases, such as diabetes, ischemic stroke, hepatitis, chronic renal failure, menstrual disorders, osteoporosis, and cardiovascular diseases [7,8,9]. One of the typical effective substances isolated from Danshen, known as Cryptotanshinone (CPT), has been revealed to have various pharmacological activities, including anti-angiogenic, anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative, anti-diabetic, and anti-obesity properties. In several cancer cells, such as breast cancer, hepatocarcinoma, prostate carcinoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, as well as melanoma cells, CPT has been shown to have noticeable anti-tumor activity [5, 10, 11]. Immunomodulatory effects have also been proposed for CPT [12]; suggesting that this substance could influence the response of cancer cells to immunotherapy.

Cancer immunotherapy, the immune system’s artificial stimulation, is an efficient method for the treatment of different cancers [13]. Immunotherapy engages the immune system in the battle against cancer by taking advantage of the capacity of the T lymphocyte for antigen-directed cytotoxicity [14]. CD4 T helper (Th) cells are characteristically classified into five main subcategories including, Th1, Th2, Th17, Tfh and Treg (T regulatory) [15]. Th1 cells secrete interferons, while Th2 cells are known for being able to secrete interleukin 13 (IL-13), IL-10, IL-5, and IL-4 production.

The development of T cells depends on their microenvironment, with cytokines playing a major role in this procedure. IFN γ/IL-12 drives Th1, and IL-4 promotes Th2 polarization [16]. Since Th1 pathways typically lead to the activation of natural killer (NK) cells, cytotoxic T-cell lymphocytes (CTL), monocytes, and macrophages, shift of immune response towards Th1 leads to tumor rejection [17].

Evidence shows that there is a state of chronic inflammation at tumor sites and that IL-4, particularly, is upregulated in the tumor microenvironment. Research has shown that IL-4 is involved in suppression of immunity against cancers, such that blockade of IL-4 leads to enhanced anti-tumor immunity, reduced tumor progression, and increased tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes [18]. On the other hand, IFNγ induces many signals in T cells to efficiently enable T cell function, while the inhibition of IFNγ signaling pathways in T cells reduces T cell responses and permits tumor growth and persistence. IFNγ signaling also enhances tumor eradication by blocking the functions of some suppressive immune cells in the tumors, including Tregs [19].

In order to keep T-cell tolerance to self-antigens, Treg cells are vital. Treg cells, which are CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ cells, belong to the family of CD4+ T cells. These cells reduce immunity to tumor-related antigens by suppressing the natural killer (NK) cell-mediated cytotoxicity as well as inhibiting the interferon (IFN)-γ secretion by immune cells [20]. Thus, these cells impair effective anti-tumor immune response and are the leading obstacle in successful immunotherapy [21]. Accordingly, it has been revealed that the percentage of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Treg cells is elevated in the tumor micro-environment of the patient with metastatic breast cancer [22].

JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway, which is extremely related to cancer initiation, metastasis, progression, chemoresistance, and immune evasion, is assumed to be a central mediator of tumor-related immune suppression [23,24,25]. STAT3 is critical in the molecular pathway required for FOXP3 expression and therefore is involved in Treg phenotype and function maintenance [26]. It has been revealed that STAT3 inhibition using small interfering RNA molecules, abrogated Foxp3 expression and suppressive functions in naturally differentiated CD4+CD25+ T lymphocytes, signifying a direct role for STAT3 in Treg function and phenotype [26]. Growing evidence shows that targeting STAT3 and its associated pathways can be used to change the immunologic microenvironment of tumors in order to support cancer immunotherapies [27,28,29]. In continuation of our research on the effects of inhibition of JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway in breast cancer tumor cells [30, 31], the aim of this study was to investigate whether CPT, naringenin, and their combination could modify immune response, immune cell proliferation, and cytokine production. We also aimed to explore the involvement of JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway and if treatment with CPT and naringenin could eventually lead to suppression of tumor growth in a mouse model of breast cancer.

Materials and methods

Mice

Inbred female Balb/c mice with the age of 6–8 weeks, weighing approximately 18 to 20 g, were purchased from Pasture Institute of Iran (Tehran, Iran). Animals were maintained for one week under standard conditions (temperature: 24 ± 1 °C, relative humidity: 40%–80%), prior to experimentation and had free access to regular chow diet and purified water. The mice were kept in a specific-pathogen-free (SPF) facility under barrier conditions. Before processing, the animals undertook anesthesia by intraperitoneal injection of 80 mg/kg ketamine and 8 mg/kg xylazine. Euthanasia of the animals was performed by cervical dislocation under general anesthesia. All animals were treated in compliance with the guide for the care and use of laboratory animals [32]. The study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines [33], and it was approved by Ethics Committee of the Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.

Spontaneous mouse mammary tumor (SMMT) production and treatment

Explants of SMMT, which is invasive ductal carcinoma, developed spontaneously in female Balb/c mice [34], were used for tumor formation in mice, as we formerly described [35]. Briefly, tumor tissue was isolated from the breast of cancer-bearing Balb/c mice and divided into pieces with dimensions of less than 0.5 cm3 by scalpel. Subcutaneous transplantation of each piece was performed into a syngenic female Balb/c mouse. After 19 days, when the size of the tumor got to 1500 mm3, treatment with the substances was started. Mice were categorized into four groups (5 mice in each group) that were treated with naringenin either individually (50 mg/kg/day) or in combination with CPT (20 mg/kg/day). A group of mice received CPT alone (20 mg/kg/day) for comparison. Naringenin and CPT were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany) and both compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to prepare the stock. In order to treat the animals, the primary stock was further diluted with saline and injected intraperitoneally, so that the amount of DMSO was less than 1 ml/kg; a concentration that has been shown to be nontoxic [36]. The mice in control group were treated with saline containing the corresponding concentration of DMSO. A digital caliper was used to measure the volume of each tumor. The following formula was used for calculating the tumor size:

V = 1/ 2 × LW2 (V: volume, L: length and W: width).

Antigen preparation

After tumors reached a volume of about 3000 mm3, tumor tissues were removed from the mice and mixed in RIPA buffer containing phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) (1.0 mM concentration), as the protease inhibitor. Tumor cell lysate was prepared by successive freeze/thawing followed by passing through 150 µm stainless steel mesh, and subsequently sonicating for 30 s by 4 W power with 20 s incubation intervals. Then the extract was filtered and the concentration of its total protein was determined using the Bradford method. The lyaste was stored frozen at -70 ◦C for the subsequent experiments.

Delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH)

The mice were primed by subcutaneous injection of 1 × 109 (0.1 mL) mouse red blood cells of sheep (sRBC) in the back. sRBCs were washed three times, and diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) solution. In order to evaluate DTH, the sensitized animals were challenged by subcutaneous injection of sRBC (1 × 109) on the left hind footpad, 5 days after priming. The intensification of the footpad thickness was quantitated before injection and after 24, 48, and 72 h, by a digital caliper, and the footpad swelling was compared in those receiving 0.9% NaCl solution or the antigen. The sensitized mice were categorized into five groups as follows: 1- control group receiving saline; 2- naringenin with the dose of 20 mg/kg/day; 3- naringenin with the dose of 50 mg/kg/day; 4- CPT (20 mg/kg/day); 5- CPT combined with naringenin, both with the dose of 20 mg/kg/day. The percent increase in footpad indicating DTH was evaluated in each group and compared with the control group.

Cell proliferation assay

Experimental mice were sacrificed and the spleens were separated. Isolation of splenocytes was performed in sterile RPMI 1640 by the needle perfusion method and the erythrocytes were removed by lysing in the Ammonium-Chloride-Potassium (ACK) lysis buffer, containing NH4Cl (0.15 mM), Na2EDTA (0.1 mM) and KHCO3 (10 mM), at room temperature. After washing the cells, they were resuspended in RPMI 1640, including fetal bovine serum (FBS) (10%) and penicillin/streptomycin antibiotic mixture (50 I.U./mL penicillin and 50 (μg/mL) streptomycin). Cells were counted with a hemocytometer under invert microscope and were seeded in 96-well plates at the density of 5 × 105 cells/well in 200 µl of phenol red-free RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, penicillin/streptomycin and 25 mM HEPES. The splenocytes were stimulated with 25 µg/ml of the tumor antigen that was previously prepared (explained above) as the test group. The cells were incubated at 37 ◦C for 36 h in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Subsequently, cells were treated with naringenin alone (50 mg/kg/day) (Nar), CPT alone (20 mg/kg/day), or naringenin (20 mg/kg/day) + CPT (20 mg/kg/day) (Nar + CPT) compared with the untreated control group.

Cell proliferation was assessed with Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) method, using the cell proliferation BrdU assay kit (Roche Diagnostic GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), as instructed by the manufacturer. Briefly, 20 μl/well BrdU labeling solution was added to the cells and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Then, the microplates were centrifuged at 300 × g for 10 min, followed by aspirating the medium and drying the cells. After cell fixation, 100 μl/well anti-BrdU-POD were added to each well. Plates were incubated for 90 min at room temperature and after washing the wells, 100 μl substrate solution was poured into each well. After color development, the absorbance was measured in a plate reader (BioTek, Synergy HTX, USA), at 370 nm (with 492 nm reference wavelength).

Measurement of cytokines profile

Splenic mononuclear cells (MNCs) were isolated from the spleens of treated and untreated animals by density gradient centrifugation, using Ficoll Hypaque (15 min,700 × g) at 20◦C. Cells were cultured in 24-well plates, at the condition mentioned above. Twenty microliters of purified tumor antigen was added to each well and after 72 h, supernatants were collected by centrifugation of plates for 10 min (Eppendorf). The supernatants were maintained frozen at -70 °C until future use. The concentrations of IFN-γ and IL-4 were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (R&D DuoSet ELISA Development kit, Germany), following the manufacturer's protocols.

Flow cytometric evaluation of the subpopulation T-lymphocytes

The removed spleens of the animals and the tumor tissues were separately cut into small pieces, rinsed with PBS, and minced with scalpel. In order to make cell suspensions, this mixture was passed through a 150-µm stainless steel mesh. The resulting cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and mixed with PBS buffer containing heat-inactivated FBS (1%) (GIBCO, Germany), 0.1% sodium azide (Sigma, Germany), and 2 mM EDTA (Sigma, Germany) together with monoclonal antibodies against CD4, CD25 and Foxp3 surface antigens, using mouse Treg Detection Kit (CD4/CD25/FoxP3) (Miltenyi Biotec, USA), following manufacturer’s protocol. Samples were incubated with antibodies for 45 min at 4 ◦C followed by washing in buffer and fixing with paraformaldehyde (2%). Subsequently, flow cytometry assay was carried out by an EPICS flow cytometer (Coulter). The gate was adjusted on the lymphoid areas of forward and side scatter areas, and the cells that were double stained were analyzed.

Western blot analysis

Tumor tissues were separated and cell suspensions were prepared as explained above. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes were isolated from the cell suspension with Ficoll-Hypaque (Lympholyte-H; Cedarlane Laboratories, Ontario, Canada). After centrifugation at 1025 g for 20 min at 20ºC, the layer of mononuclear cells were transferred to a separate tube and washed twice with complete RPMI medium. The isolated lymphocytes were lysed with RIPA buffer containing PMSF as the protease inhibitor and the protein content of the cell lysate was assessed utilizing bicinchoninic acid assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK). Equal amounts of total protein (40 µg total protein/lane) were loaded on 10% SDS-PAGE. After separation of proteins, they were transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, USA) via semi-dry blotting. The membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat milk at room temperature for 1 h. Subsequently, the membranes were incubated in the buffer solution containing the 1:1000 dilution of each of the primary antibodies against phosphorylated JAK2 (Cell Signaling, USA), phosphorylated STAT3 (Cell Signaling, USA), JAK2 (Cell Signaling, USA), STAT3 (Cell Signaling, USA), and β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, UK) was used as the secondary antibody and the succeeding visualization was done with SuperSignal chemiluminescent kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK).

Real-time PCR

Total RNA was isolated by RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Germany), as stated by the manufacturer. The complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized by reverse transcriptase enzyme using 1 µg/ml RNA, oligo-d(T)15 primer (Roche Applied Sciences), and molony murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (MMLV; Gibco). Target genes were amplified and analyzed by real-time PCR using SYBR-green and specific primers (Table 1).

Table 1 The sequences of the primers
Full size table

Statistical analysis

The results were analyzed as the mean ± standard deviations (SD) of the results, obtained from at least three separate experiments, each performed as triplicate. Statistical analysis was carried out by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett's post hoc test for multiple comparisons as well as two-tailed Student’s t-test in SPSS software (version 16). Results were considered as statistically significant when the P value of < 0.05 was obtained.

Results

Effect of Naringenin and CPT on tumor volume

As shown in Fig. 1A, intraperitoneally injection of naringenin, either individually or in combination with CPT, resulted in a remarkable tumor regression in comparison with the control group. Combination of CPT and naringenin caused a more prominent decline in the rate of tumor growth, compared with those receiving only naringenin or CPT individually; an effect that became significantly different after day 7.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A The tumor volume (Mean ± SD) in the treated and untreated control group (5 mice/group). Treated group consisted of mice (5 mice in each group) receiving daily intraperitoneal injections of naringenin (50 mg/kg/day) or CPT (20 mg/Kg/day) or their combination (naringenin + CPT) for 10 consecutive days. B Proliferation assay of splenocytes treated with naringenin alone (50 mg/kg/day) (Nar), CPT (20 mg/Kg/day), or naringenin (20 mg/kg/day) + CPT (20 mg/kg/day) (Nar + CPT) compared with the untreated control group (receiving DMSO as the solvent). C Levels of IFN-γ and IL-4 secreted from splenocytes stimulated by tumor antigen in animals treated with naringenin (Nar) alone or combined with CPT (Nar + CPT). D Percentage of intra-tumoral and splenic CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+  T cells in animals treated with naringenin (Nar), either individually (50 mg/kg/day) or in combination with CPT (both with the concentration of 20 mg/kg/day). N = 5 in each group. * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01 represents significant differences in comparison with control values

Full size image

Effect of naringenin and CPT on DTH response

The results of naringenin and CPT treatment on immune response is presented in Table 2. DTH responses were significantly different from control group in mice receiving naringenin with the dose of 50 mg/Kg/day (group 3) and those that were treated with the combination of naringenin and CPT (group 5) (respectively 1.8 fold and 2.4 fold higher than control group after 24 h). The combinational naringenin + CPT regimen resulted in the most prominent DTH response (P < 0.05).

Table 2 The effect of naringenin and CPT on DTH responses in Balb/c mice against red blood cells of sheep (sRBC)
Full size table

Effect of Naringenin and CPT on cell proliferation

The proliferation of splenocytes were investigated after treatment with naringenin (50 mg/Kg/day) or its combination with CPT (20 mg/Kg/day). The results are presented in Fig. 1B and reflect the mean values of triplicates after stimulation with specific tumor antigen. Naringenin significantly induced cell proliferation, compared with the control cells (1.25 fold increase compared to control cells, P < 0.05). When used together with CPT, naringenin caused approximately 2.2 fold increase in cell proliferation which was significantly higher than control cells (P < 0.01).

The effect of naringenin and CPT on IFN-γ and IL-4 production

The levels of IL-4 and IFN-γ, secreted from the splenocytes of treated and untreated tumor-bearing animals, are presented in Fig. 1C. Treatment with naringenin significantly reduced IL-4 levels compared with control and caused about 35% reduction in IL-4 levels. However, when naringenin and CPT were co-administered, IL-4 level was further decreased to half the level of that in control cells. Furthermore, our data demonstrated a significant upsurge in the production of IFN-γ by splenocytes of the mice that were treated by both naringenin and CPT (2.3 fold compared to control, P < 0.01). Although the levels of IFN-γ was approximately 1.2 fold increased in response to naringenin, treatment with naringenin alone did not have any significant effect on IFN-γ production compared to control, pointing out that here the CPT was the effective agent on IFN-γ production and secretion.

Splenic and intra-tumor CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells

Data revealed that frequencies of intra-tumoral and splenic CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells were significantly lower than the control group in animals that were administered with both naringenin and CPT-treated animals (32.0% and 38.8% compared to control, respectively(P ˂0.01) (Fig. 1D). The frequencies of intra-tumor CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells in animals treated only with naringenin did not show any significant difference; showing that CPT but not naringenin was able to modulate intratunoral Tregs. However, the number of splenic CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells were significantly lower in naringenin-treated animals (55.5% compared to control) as well as combination of naringenin and CPT (Fig. 1D).

Combined treatment with naringenin and CPT suppressed JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway

As shown in Fig. 2, individual treatment with naringenin was not able to decrease JAK2 and STAT3 phosphorylation. On the other hand, CPT which is a well-known inhibitor of STAT3, caused a significant decline in the phosphorylation of both JAK2 and STAT3. Interestingly, the addition of naringenin to CPT augmented the inhibitory effect of CPT, and further declined the phosphorylation of both JAK2 and STAT3. None of the compounds had any particular effect on total protein levels of JAK2 and STAT3, as well as β-actin protein expression level.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Phosphorylation status of JAK2 (p-JAK2) and STAT3 (p-STAT3) together with their total protein level in tumor infiltrating immune cells, evaluated by Western blotting after administration of naringenin (50 mg/Kg/day) (Nar) and CPT (20 mg/kg/day) either individually or together (both at the concentration of 20 mg/kg/day). The blots were visualized on the X-ray film after processing of the blots with enhanced chemiluminescent (ECL) reagent. The original images are presented in supplementary file with the edges of the blot images visible (the blots were cut prior to hybridization). The results of the densitometry of the bands are presented in the graphs. Protein level of β-actin was used for normalizing the results. * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, P < 0.001, compared to control. #P < 0.05 compared to CPT

Full size image

Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 have long been recognized as the direct targets of STAT3. Thus, in order to confirm the down-regulation of STAT3 by naringenin and CPT, the expression of both Bcl-XL and Mcl-1 genes were investigated. As it is shown in Fig. 3, although naringenin alone was not able to change the expression levels of the studied genes, both CPT and its combination with naringenin were able to reduce the expression of Bcl-XL and Mcl-1 genes (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The expression of (A) Bcl-XL and (B) Mcl-1 genes, after administration of naringenin (50 mg/kg/day) (Nar) and CPT (20 mg/kg/day) either individually or together (both at the concentration of 20 mg/kg/day). The expression of genes were measured by real-time PCR and analyzed using ΔΔCt method. * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, P < 0.001, compared to control

Full size image

Discussion

Cancer immunotherapy, the immune system’s artificial stimulation, as well as the use of natural products have been proposed as efficient methods in the treatment of different cancers [13, 37]. In this study, we sought to reveal anti-tumor and immunomodulatory properties for CPT and naringenin and their combination, in order to establish their potential as adjuvant therapy in breast cancer. We first showed that naringenin was able to significantly decrease tumor size, an effect that was potentiated with the addition of CPT. Consistently, several previous articles have reported anticancer activities for CPT, as a specific natural STAT3 inhibitor [38], as well as naringenin, a well-known natural flavonoid, against different types of cancers [39,40,41,42,43,44].

Recently, numerous immune-based therapies have been established to be beneficial for the eradication of tumors in animal models. Primary immune organs, including the spleen and thymus, play vital roles in controlling the anti-tumor immunity [45]. The spleen is the principal peripheral lymphoid organ in the body and is the location of B and T cells. Lymphocyte activity and proliferation in the spleen represent its immune ability and the cellular immune function of the body [46]. Here we showed increased proliferation of splenocytes in response to treatment with naringenin and its combination with CPT, suggesting that these two compounds influence the immune system. A significant elevation was also observed in the DTH response especially in the naringenin + CPT group in comparison with the control group, further confirming their immunomodulatory properties. Naingenin has been previously reported to be able to exert immunomodulatory effects. In mouse model of invasive melanoma, naringenin promoted NK cell differentiation, maturation, and cytotoxicity against cancer, and its combination with asiatic acid produced an additive effect [47]. Other natural substances such as curcumin and resveratrol have also shown immunomodulatory properties [48].

Cancer is accompanied by chronic inflammation in which immune cells enhance rather than suppress tumor growth. Thus, changing the type of inflammation to the one that causes tissue rejection, is an attractive method to eradicate tumors by immune effector cells. Th cells range from those that can dampen the immune response (such as Foxp3+ Treg), to those that can cause tumor destruction (such as IFN-γ-secreting Th1). Thus, shifting the immune response towards the latter and the induction of tumor antigen specific Th1 immunity may be of benefit in the treatment of cancer patients.

Our results demonstrated for the first time that naringenin led to a change in Th1/Th2 balance towards Th1-dominant immunity; an effect that was potentiated by coadministration of CPT. It has been previously reported that the frequency of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Treg cells is amplified in the tumor micro-environment and peripheral blood mononuclear cells, indicating that the enhancement of Treg cells is a widespread problem [22]. Thus, decreased percentage of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ in both spleen and breast tumor tissue by naringenin and CPT might be of significant benefit for breast cancer immunotherapy.

Treatment with naringenin, either alone or combined with CPT, also resulted in a significantly reduced production of IL-4, the most important Th2 cytokine that promotes the proliferation and survival of several cancer cells [49]. Additionally, coadministration of naringenin and CPT increased production of IFN-γ, an important effector cytokine of anti-tumor immunity [50]. In line with our findings, naringenin has been previously introduced as an effective substance in reducing the production of the pro-inflammatory factor TNF-α and attenuating the levels of IL-1β and IL-6 in human cultured macrophages [51]. Another study also described enhanced antitumor activity of the T cells after treatment of mouse model of breast cancer with naringenin, with an increased proportion of IFN-γ and IL-2 expressing T cells [52]. Additionally, Naringenin has been shown to be able to improve the immunosuppressive environment of lung tumor by reducing transforming growth factor-beta1 production and diminishing the number of regulatory T cells [53].

Previous studies have provided evidence that the anticancer activity of naringenin and CPT occurs via inhibition of STAT3 signaling pathway in pancreatic cancer cells and vascular endothelial cells [54, 55]. The results of our study revealed that CPT is capable of suppressing JAK2 and STAT3 phosphorylation in breast cancer cells and its combination with naringenin exerts as additive effect on JAK/STAT pathway. In line with our findings, CPT has been shown to inhibit the phosphorylation of STAT3 at Tyr705 in a dose-dependent manner, without noticeable effects on the total level of STAT3 in pancreatic cancer cells [55]. The short term effect of CPT on STAT3 phosphorylation has suggested a direct effect of this substance [55]. The same effect has also been observed for CPT in prostate cancer cells [38]. Consistently, naringenin has also been introduced as an effective inhibitor of STAT3 phosphorylation in vascular endothelial cells [56]. Although we did not observe a significant change in STAT3 and JAK2 phosphorylation in response to naringenin, the augmented suppression of STAT3 and JAK2 phosphorylation after co-administration of naringenin and CPT, highlights that these two substances act in the same direction and therefore they form a suitable combination. Consistently the effect of naringenin on some other studied parameters was modest or nonsignificant; nevertheless, the same concentration could potentiate CPT to exert higher effect.

A previous study by Pallandre et al. demonstrated that suppression of STAT3, using small interfering RNA molecules, leads to repressed Foxp3 expression and functions of differentiated CD4+CD25+ T lymphocytes [26]. Moreover this study reported that STAT3 inhibition in CD4+ lymphocytes improved the anti-tumor immunity conferred by a lymphocyte adoptive transfer [26]. Accordingly, the decline in the frequencies of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells in the mice treated with the combination of naringenin and CPT might be attributed to the suppression of STAT3 signaling pathway. STAT3 is a well-known regulator of Bcl-2 family genes including Bcl-xL [57]. Mcl-1 which is another member of Bcl-2 family, is an imperative anti-apoptotic protein in the development of multiple cell types including T lymphocytes [58]. Downregulation of Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 further confirms the manipulation of STAT3 pathway by the combined treatment of naringenin and CPT.

The limitation of our study is that we could not investigate molecular interaction between the studied compounds and JAK/STAT pathway and therefore we cannot conclude a direct effect on this pathway. Another limitation is that we could not expand our study to evaluate complete profile of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines which is suggested for future studies.

Current cancer treatments have low efficiency and exhibit toxicities that are usually harmful. Numerous evidences support that agents derived from plants have more pharmacological safety and can be useful not only for the prevention of cancer but also for its treatment. The results of this study show that naringenin and CPT exert immunomodulatory effects and have the molecular targets that are similar to the therapies currently used to treat cancer. Thus, these agents can be used as adjuvants to current chemotherapy agents to enhance therapeutic effects and minimize therapy-induced toxicity.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrated an immunomodulatory and antitumor effect for naringenin and its combination with CPT in an animal model of breast cancer. Attenuation of JAK/STAT pathway in breast cancer, the shift in immune response towards Th1, and the consequent changes in the secretion of the relevant cytokines may be the mechanisms by which naringenin and CPT effectively suppress breast cancer. Thus, naringenin and CPT may be considered as a novel combination for supplementation in breast cancer immunotherapy trials.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rebecca S, Siegel M, Kimberly D, Miller M, Ahmedin JD. Cancer statistics. Ca Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(27):7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ginsburg O, Bray F, Coleman MP, Vanderpuye V, Eniu A, Kotha SR, et al. The global burden of women’s cancers: a grand challenge in global health. Lancet. 2017;389(10071):847–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang C-L, Huang T, Wu B-L, He W-X, Liu D. Stem cells in cancer therapy: opportunities and challenges. Oncotarget. 2017;8(43):75756.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Li W, Saud SM, Young MR, Colburn NH, Hua B. Cryptotanshinone, a Stat3 inhibitor, suppresses colorectal cancer proliferation and growth in vitro. Mol Cell Biochem. 2015;406(1–2):63–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Patel K, Singh GK, Patel DK. A review on pharmacological and analytical aspects of naringenin. Chin J Integr Med. 2018;24(7):551–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chun-Yan S, Qian-Liang M, Rahman K, Ting H, Lu-Ping Q. Salvia miltiorrhiza: traditional medicinal uses, chemistry, and pharmacology. Chin J Nat Med. 2015;13(3):163–82.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim DH, Paudel P, Yu T, Ngo TM, Kim JA, Jung HA, et al. Characterization of the inhibitory activity of natural tanshinones from Salvia miltiorrhiza roots on protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B. Chem Biol Interact. 2017;278:65–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park B, Song HS, Kwon JE, Cho SM, Jang S-A, Kim MY, et al. Effects of Salvia miltiorrhiza extract with supplemental liquefied calcium on osteoporosis in calcium-deficient ovariectomized mice. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017;17(1):545.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Li S, Wang H, Hong L, Liu W, Huang F, Wang J, et al. Cryptotanshinone inhibits breast cancer cell growth by suppressing estrogen receptor signaling. Cancer Biol Ther. 2015;16(1):176–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen Z, Zhu R, Zheng J, Chen C, Huang C, Ma J, et al. Cryptotanshinone inhibits proliferation yet induces apoptosis by suppressing STAT3 signals in renal cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8(30):50023.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Li H, Gao C, Liu C, Liu L, Zhuang J, Yang J, et al. A review of the biological activity and pharmacology of cryptotanshinone, an important active constituent in Danshen. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;137: 111332.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Farkona S, Diamandis EP, Blasutig IM. Cancer immunotherapy: the beginning of the end of cancer? BMC Med. 2016;14(1):73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Waldman AD, Fritz JM, Lenardo MJ. A guide to cancer immunotherapy: from T cell basic science to clinical practice. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20(11):651–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu X, Zhu J. CD4 T Helper Cell Subsets and Related Human Immunological Disorders. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(21):8011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Franciotta D, Zardini E, Bergamaschi R, Andreoni L, Cosi V. Interferon γ and interleukin 4 producing T cells in peripheral blood of multiple sclerosis patients undergoing immunomodulatory treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74(1):123–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Noori S, Taghikhani M, M. Hassan Z, Allameh A, Mostafaei A. Tehranolide Could Shift the Immune Response towards Th1 and Modulate the Intra-Tumor Infiltrated T Regulatory Cells. Iran J Immunol. 2009;6(4):216–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ito SE, Shirota H, Kasahara Y, Saijo K, Ishioka C. IL-4 blockade alters the tumor microenvironment and augments the response to cancer immunotherapy in a mouse model. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2017;66(11):1485–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ni L, Lu J. Interferon gamma in cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Med. 2018;7(9):4509–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Verma A, Mathur R, Farooque A, Kaul V, Gupta S, Dwarakanath BS. T-regulatory cells in tumor progression and therapy. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:10731–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zou W. Regulatory T cells, tumour immunity and immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6(4):295–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sredni B, Tichler T, Shani A, Catane R, Kaufman B, Strassmann G, et al. Predominance of TH1 response in tumor-bearing mice and cancer patients treated with AS 101. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88:1276–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jin W. Role of JAK/STAT3 signaling in the regulation of metastasis, the transition of cancer stem cells, and chemoresistance of cancer by epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cells. 2020;9(1):217.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Marotta LL, Almendro V, Marusyk A, Shipitsin M, Schemme J, Walker SR, et al. The JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway is required for growth of CD44+CD24ˉ stem cell-like breast cancer cells in human tumors. J Clin Investig. 2011;121(7):2723–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kitamura H, Ohno Y, Toyoshima Y, Ohtake J, Homma S, Kawamura H, et al. Interleukin-6/STAT3 signaling as a promising target to improve the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Sci. 2017;108(10):1947–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Pallandre JR, Brillard E, Créhange G, Radlovic A, Remy-Martin JP, Saas P, et al. Role of STAT3 in CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ regulatory lymphocyte generation: implications in graft-versus-host disease and antitumor immunity. J immunol (Baltimore, Md : 1950). 2007;179(11):7593–604.

  27. Lee H, Pal SK, Reckamp K, Figlin RA, Yu H. STAT3: a target to enhance antitumor immune response. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2011;344:41–59.

  28. Qin J-J, Yan L, Zhang J, Zhang W-D. STAT3 as a potential therapeutic target in triple negative breast cancer: a systematic review. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):195.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu H, Jove R. The STATs of cancer—new molecular targets come of age. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4(2):97–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nourbakhsh M, Farzaneh S, Taghikhani A, Zarghi A, Noori S. The effect of a newly synthesized ferrocene derivative against MCF-7 breast cancer cells and spheroid stem cells through ROS production and inhibition of JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2020;20(7):875–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Afshari H, Nourbakhsh M, Salehi N, Mahboubi-Rabbani M, Zarghi A, Noori S. STAT3-mediated apoptotic-enhancing function of sclareol against breast cancer cells and cell sensitization to cyclophosphamide. Iran J Pharm Res. 2020;19(1):398–412.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Council NR. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 8th ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. p. 246.

    Google Scholar 

  33. du PercieSert N, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology. 2020;18(7):e3000410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Langroudi L, Hasan Z, Ardeshirylajimi A, Soleimani M. Isolation and characterization of a new cell line from spontaneous mouse mammary tumour, MBL-6, for in vivo cancer studies. Vet Sci Dev. 2017;7(1):6042.

  35. Noori S, Taghikhani M, Hassan ZM, Allameha A, Mostafaei A. Tehranolide molecule modulates the immune response, reduce regulatory T cell and inhibits tumor growth in vivo. Mol Immunol. 2010;47(7):1579–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gad SC, Cassidy CD, Aubert N, Spainhour B, Robbe H. Nonclinical Vehicle Use in Studies by Multiple Routes in Multiple Species. Int J Toxicol. 2006;25(6):499–521.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cragg GM, Pezzuto JM. natural products as a vital source for the discovery of cancer chemotherapeutic and chemopreventive agents. Med Princ Pract. 2016;25(suppl 2 Suppl. 2):41–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shin DS, Kim HN, Shin KD, Yoon YJ, Kim SJ, Han DC, et al. Cryptotanshinone inhibits constitutive signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 function through blocking the dimerization in DU145 prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2009;69(1):193–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bao L, Liu F, Guo HB, Li Y, Tan BB, Zhang WX, et al. Naringenin inhibits proliferation, migration, and invasion as well as induces apoptosis of gastric cancer SGC7901 cell line by downregulation of AKT pathway. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(8):11365–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen L, Wang H-J, Xie W, Yao Y, Zhang Y-S, Wang H. Cryptotanshinone inhibits lung tumorigenesis and induces apoptosis in cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Mol Med Rep. 2014;9(6):2447–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Gumushan Aktas H, Akgun T. Naringenin inhibits prostate cancer metastasis by blocking voltage-gated sodium channels. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;106:770–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu Y, Lin F, Chen Y, Wang R, Liu J, Jin Y, et al. Cryptotanshinone inhibites bladder cancer cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis via the PTEN/PI3K/AKT Pathway. J Cancer. 2020;11(2):488–99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Parashar P, Tripathi CB, Arya M, Kanoujia J, Singh M, Yadav A, et al. Biotinylated naringenin intensified anticancer effect of gefitinib in urethane-induced lung cancer in rats: favourable modulation of apoptotic regulators and serum metabolomics. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018;46(sup3):S598-s610.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu CF, Klauck SM, Efferth T. Anticancer activity of cryptotanshinone on acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Arch Toxicol. 2016;90(9):2275–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tan X, Chen W, Jiao C, Liang H, Yun H, He C, et al. Anti-tumor and immunomodulatory activity of the aqueous extract of Sarcodon imbricatus in vitro and in vivo. Food Funct. 2020;11(1):1110–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen C, Su X, Hu Z. Immune promotive effect of bioactive peptides may be mediated by regulating the expression of SOCS1/miR-155. Exp Ther Med. 2019;18(3):1850–62.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Lian GY, Wang QM, Tang PM, Zhou S, Huang XR, Lan HY. Combination of Asiatic Acid and Naringenin Modulates NK Cell Anti-cancer Immunity by Rebalancing Smad3/Smad7 Signaling. Mol Ther. 2018;26(9):2255–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Casey SC, Amedei A, Aquilano K, Azmi AS, Benencia F, Bhakta D, et al. Cancer prevention and therapy through the modulation of the tumor microenvironment. Semin Cancer Biol. 2015;35:S199–223.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Setrerrahmane S, Xu H. Tumor-related interleukins: old validated targets for new anti-cancer drug development. Mol Cancer. 2017;16(1):153.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Castro F, Cardoso AP, Gonçalves RM, Serre K, Oliveira MJ. Interferon-gamma at the crossroads of tumor immune surveillance or evasion. Front Immunol. 2018;9:847.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Mendes LF, Gaspar VM, Conde TA, Mano JF, Duarte IF. Flavonoid-mediated immunomodulation of human macrophages involves key metabolites and metabolic pathways. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):14906.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Qin L, Jin L, Lu L, Lu X, Zhang C, Zhang F, et al. Naringenin reduces lung metastasis in a breast cancer resection model. Protein Cell. 2011;2(6):507–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Du G, Jin L, Han X, Song Z, Zhang H, Liang W. Naringenin: a potential immunomodulator for inhibiting lung fibrosis and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2009;69(7):3205–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wiejak J, Dunlop J, Mackay SP, Yarwood SJ. Flavanoids induce expression of the suppressor of cytokine signalling 3 (SOCS3) gene and suppress IL-6-activated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) activation in vascular endothelial cells. Biochem J. 2013;454(2):283–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ge Y, Yang B, Chen Z, Cheng R. Cryptotanshinone suppresses the proliferation and induces the apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells via the STAT3 signaling pathway. Mol Med Rep. 2015;12(5):7782–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Wiejak J, Dunlop J, Mackay S, Yarwood S. Flavanoids Induce Expression of the Suppressor of Cytokine Signalling 3 (SOCS3) Gene and Suppress IL6- Activated Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 (STAT3) Activation in Vascular Endothelial Cells. Biochem J. 2013;454(2):283–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Lee J-K, Won C, Yi EH, Seok S-H, Kim M-H, Kim S-J, et al. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) contributes to T-cell homeostasis by regulating pro-survival Bcl-2 family genes. Immunology. 2013;140(3):288–300.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Dzhagalov I, Dunkle A, He Y-W. The anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family member Mcl-1 promotes T lymphocyte survival at multiple stages. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md : 1950). 2008;181(1):521–8.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was financially supported by Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Shokoofe Noori, Niloofar Deravi & Niloufar Salehi

  2. Finetech in Medicine Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Mitra Nourbakhsh

  3. Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Mitra Nourbakhsh

  4. Nutrition Department, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Hossein Imani

  5. Metabolic Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran

    Zohreh Abdolvahabi

Authors
  1. Shokoofe Noori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mitra Nourbakhsh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hossein Imani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Niloofar Deravi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Niloufar Salehi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zohreh Abdolvahabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SN: Designed and supervised the study and analyzed the results. MN contributed in writing the manuscript and interpretation of the data. HI, ND, NS and ZA contributed in the conduction of the research. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitra Nourbakhsh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study and animal experiments were approved by Ethics Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. All animals were treated in compliance with the guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. The study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noori, S., Nourbakhsh, M., Imani, H. et al. Naringenin and cryptotanshinone shift the immune response towards Th1 and modulate T regulatory cells via JAK2/STAT3 pathway in breast cancer. BMC Complement Med Ther 22, 145 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-022-03625-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-022-03625-x

Keywords

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies

ISSN: 2662-7671

Contact us