Skip to main content
Download PDF

Cytotoxic flavone-C-glycosides from the leaves of Dypsis pembana (H.E.Moore) Beentje & J.Dransf., Arecaceae: in vitro and molecular docking studies

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies volume 23, Article number: 214 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cancer poses a health threat, with an increased incidence worldwide. Thus, it is essential to develop new natural anticancer agents. Dypsis pembana (H.E.Moore) Beentje & J.Dransf (DP) is an ornamental plant belonging to the family Arecaceae. This study aimed to isolate and identify phytoconstituents from the leaves of this plant and evaluate their in vitro cytotoxic activities.

Methods

Different chromatographic techniques were applied to fractionate the hydro-alcoholic extract of DP and separate the major phytoconstituents. The isolated compounds were structurally elucidated based on their physical and spectroscopic data. The in vitro cytotoxic activities of the crude extract and fractions thereof were evaluated against human colon carcinoma (HCT-116), human breast carcinoma (MCF-7), and human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG-2) cell lines via MTT assay. Moreover, selected isolates were tested against HepG-2 cell line. Molecular docking analysis was performed to investigate the interactions of these compounds with two potential targets, the human topoisomerase IIα and cyclin-dependent kinase 2 enzymes.

Results

Thirteen diverse compounds were reported for the first time from DP, providing significant chemotaxonomic biomarkers. Among tested compounds, vicenin-II (7) was the most cytotoxic against HepG-2 cell line, with an IC50 value of 14.38 µg/mL, followed by isovitexin (13) (IC50 of 15.39 µg/mL). These experimental findings were complemented by molecular docking, which demonstrated that vicenin-II exhibited superior enzyme-binding affinities to the studied vital targets and shed light on the structure–activity relationships among the investigated flavone-C-glycosides members.

Conclusion

The phytochemical profile of DP was characterized for the first time, reflecting chemotaxonomic data about the concerned species, genus, or even the family. Biological and computational findings revealed that vicenin-II and isovitexin are possible lead structures as inhibitors of the human topoisomerase IIα and cyclin-dependent kinase 2 enzymes.

Peer Review reports

Background

Globally, cancer is one of the leading causes of death. There are 200 varieties of cancer that have been described, each with distinct characteristics and treatments [1]. In Egypt, the most prevalent type of cancer is liver cancer, followed by breast cancer, while colorectal cancer is the seventh most common one [2]. Dypsis genus (family Arecaceae) comprises about 140 species. It is a palm with a wide range of habits, from big canopy trees to small shrubs, that is found in Madagascar and nearby islands [3]. Previous studies on the genus revealed the presence of diverse secondary metabolites; flavonoids, lignans, tannins, saponins, triterpenes, steroids and verified that the genus possess cytotoxic, antioxidant, antimicrobial, and hepatoprotective activities in addition to its ornamental importance [4, 5]. Dypsis pembana (H.E.Moore) Beentje & J.Dransf. is native to Pemba Islands, Ngezi Forest Reserve, Tanzania. Its synonym is Chrysalidocarpus pembanus H.E. Moore and popularly known as the Mpapindi Palm. It is widely used as an ornamental plant [6]. To date, no literature could be found about the phytochemical and biological investigation of this species. Therefore, the present investigation aimed to establish the phytochemical profile, explore chemotaxonomic characteristics, and evaluate the cytotoxic activity of this species. Additionally, molecular docking was used to assess the binding affinity of the isolated compounds towards certain proposed target enzymes.

Materials and methods

Plant material

As stated in our previous botanical study [7], DP leaves were collected from Al-Abed Palm Garden along Cairo-Alexandria Desert Road in March 2020. Dr. Trease Labib, a plant taxonomy consultant at the Egyptian Ministry of Agriculture certified the plant identity. A sample (Aun-Phg-0002016) has been provided to the herbarium of Pharmacognosy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Assiut University.

General experimental procedure

The NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Avance DRX spectrometer at 400 MHz and 500 MHz (Bruker Scientific Instruments, MA, USA) using CDCl3 and DMSO-d6 (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo., USA). For Column chromatography (CC), several adsorbents were used, including Polyamide SC-6 (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany), silica gel G60 (60–120 mesh, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), reversed phase RP-18 silica gel (E-Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), Sephadex LH-20 (25–100 mm mesh size, E-Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and Diaion® HP-20 (Sorbent Technologies, Norcross, GA, USA). Pre-coated silica G60 F254 0.25 mm and RP-18 F254 0.25 mm (E-Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were used for TLC. n-hexane, dichloromethane (CH2Cl2), ethyl acetate (EtOAc), and methanol (MeOH) were obtained from El-Nasr Pharmaceutical and Chemical Co., Egypt. MCF-7, HepG-2, and HCT-116 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD). Dimethyl sulfoxide, vinblastine sulfate, MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromide) and trypan blue dye were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo., USA). Fetal bovine serum (Lonza, Belgium). RPMI-1640 (Roswell Park Memorial Institute) medium, DMEM and HEPES buffer solution, ʟ-Glutamine, Gentamycin, Trypsin-EDTA 0.25% were obtained from Lonza Bioscience (Belgium).

Extraction and isolation

Extraction of the leaves (5 kg) via successive maceration of the dried powder in 70% methanol (5 × 20 L) and vacuum concentration of extracts resulted in a crude residue of 870 g. For fractionation, a suspension of this crude extract in distilled H2O (500 mL) was sequentially partitioned with n-hexane (5 × 1 L), dichloromethane (CH2Cl2) (5 × 1 L), and ethyl acetate (EtOAc) (5 × 1 L) (supporting data, Scheme S1). Each phase was concentrated under reduced pressure to give the corresponding fractions: n-hexane fraction (64 g), CH2Cl2 fraction (37 g), EtOAc fraction (30 g), and aqueous fraction (700 g). As illustrated in (supporting data, Scheme S2), vacuum Liquid Chromatography (VLC) of a portion of the n-hexane fraction (25 g), using gradient of n-hexane-EtOAc mixtures for elution, gave six subfractions (H-I to H-VI). H-II (7 g) was subjected to silica gel CC (280 g), eluted with n-hexane-EtOAc 95:5, to afford 1 (15 mg) and 2 (20 mg). H-III (4.5 g) was fractionated using silica gel CC (180 g), which eluted with n-hexane-EtOAc 9:1, to yield 3 (100 mg), after purification with crystallization. A portion of the CH2Cl2 fraction (25 g) was subjected to silica VLC, eluted with gradient mixtures of CH2Cl2-MeOH. As a result, six subfractions (D-I to D-VI) were collected. D-IV (6 g) was chromatographed over silica CC (280 g), eluted with CH2Cl2-MeOH 9:1, then, re-chromatographed on silica gel CC (240 g), eluted gradient with CH2Cl2-MeOH solvent system to give three subfractions D-IV-1 to D-IV-3. D-IV-2 (200 mg) was subjected to Sephadex LH-20 CC (100 g), eluted with MeOH-H2O 1:1, to afford 4 (12 mg) and 5 (10 mg). Repeated silica gel chromatography of D-IV-3 (1.8 g) and further purification afforded 6 (100 mg). Schematic representation of the fractionation process of dichloromethane fraction was included (supporting data, Scheme S3). As depicted in the schematic diagram (Scheme 1), a portion of the EtOAc fraction (25 g) was fractionated via VLC, applying gradient mixtures of CH2Cl2-MeOH for elution, into six subfractions (E-I to E-VI). E-III (13 g) was loaded on polyamide SC-6 CC (250 g) and eluted with H2O-MeOH gradient mixtures to be fractionated into four subfractions E-III-A to E-III-D. Fractionation of E-III-B (8 g) with reversed phase silica gel CC (250 g), eluted with H2O-MeOH gradient mixtures, afforded four subfractions E-III-B1 to E-III-B4. E-III-B1 (2 g), E-III-B2 (1 g), E-III-B3 (1.5 g), and E-III-B4 (2 g) were separately subjected to Sephadex LH-20 CC (100 g), eluted with a combination of MeOH-H2O 1:1. As a consequence, E-III-B1 afforded 7 (8 mg) and 8 (20 mg), E-III-B2 afforded 9 (10 mg), E-III-B3 gave 10 (12 mg) and 11 (22 mg), and E-III-B4 resulted in 12 (20 mg) and 13 (15 mg).

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Isolation and purification of compounds 7–13 from the ethyl acetate fraction of Dypsis pembana leaves

Full size image

Cytotoxic assay

The in vitro cytotoxic activity of the crude extract and the derived fractions was evaluated by viability assay against HCT-116, MCF-7, and HepG-2 cell lines, and performed as described previously [8, 9]. Briefly, the cell lines were subcultured in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator twice to three times per week at 37 °C. The tumour cell lines were incubated at a density of 5 x 104 cell/well. Then, from each investigated sample, three replicates of 8–10 concentrations were prepared and added; untreated controls with 0.5% DMSO were also included. The MTT assay was performed to assess the number of viable cells after 24 h of incubation. In brief, the medium in each well was withdrawn and replaced with a combination of fresh RPMI 1640 medium (100 μL) and 12 mM MTT stock solution (10 μL) and incubated for 4 h at 37 °C. After replacing a portion of the medium with 50 μl of DMSO, the optical density was estimated at 590 nm using the microplate reader to evaluate the cells viability after sample treatment. Using Graphpad Prism 8.0.1 software, IC50 values were calculated from graphic plots of the dose response curves.

Statistical analysis

All experimental data are represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three replicates. Microsoft Excel program 2016 was used for graphs drawing.

Molecular docking

The target ligands for modelling were built using the builder interface of the MOE (Molecular Operating Environment) software package 2020.01 and subjected to conformational search. Conformers were optimized through energy minimization until a RMSD gradient of 0.01 Kcal/mol and RMS distance of 0.1 Å with MMFF94X force-field and the partial charges were automatically calculated. The obtained database was then saved as MDB file to be used in the docking investigation. The x-ray co-crystal structure of human topoisomerase IIα in complex with DNA and etoposide (PDB code: 5gwk) [10], and co-crystal structure cyclin-dependent kinase 2 in complex with sunitinib (PDB code: 3ti1) [11], were obtained from Protein Data Bank. Docking was run on the binding site of the co-crystallized ligand. Since the crystal structure contains a ligand molecule, the program automatically identifies the binding site, and we dock the tested ligands on it. For structure preparation, three steps were done: a. Correct: in which the program check atoms connections and corrects any break in the chains. b. Protonate 3D: in which the program adds the hydrogen atoms. c. Fixing the potential of the enzyme atoms after selection of the whole enzyme structure. Docking of the conformations database of the target ligands was done using MOE-DOCK software wizard. The following parameters were adjusted: Receptor and solvent as receptor, Co-crystalized ligand atoms as active site, Database containing test ligands as ligand, London dG as initial scoring function, GBVI/WSA dG as final scoring function, MMFF94x force field was used for calculating the energy parameters of the ligand – cleavage complex model. To compare between the conformers, London dG was used as scoring function, lower values indicate more favourable poses. The dock calculations were run, and the obtained poses were studied. The 2D and 3D ligand interactions for each compound were saved as picture files.

Results

Using various chromatographic techniques and spectral analysis, thirteen compounds (Fig. 1) were isolated and identified from DP. Physicochemical properties, spectral data (1H and 13C NMR) of the isolated compounds (1–13) (supporting data, S1), and their spectra (supporting data, Fig. S1–S26) were included. These compounds were identified as arborinol (1) [12], isoarborinol (2) [13], stigmasterol (3a) [14], β-sitosterol (3b) [14]. Kaempferol (4) [15], quercetin (5) [15], β-sitosterol-3-O-β-d-glucopyranoside (6) [16], vicenin-II (7) [17], rutin (8) [18], kaempferol-3-O-neohesperidoside (9) [19], isoquercetrin (10) [20], orientin (11) [21], vitexin (12) [5], and isovitexin (13) [5].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Structures of the compounds isolated from DP leaves

Full size image

Concerning the in vitro cytotoxic study, the percentages of cell viability were used to make the dose response curves of cytotoxic activity of the crude extract and different fractions (supporting data, Fig. S27), and estimate their IC50 values (Table 1) which revealed that the most potent fractions were the ethyl acetate and n-hexane fractions against HepG-2 cell line. Based on that, the cytotoxic activity of certain compounds isolated from these fractions was investigated against HepG-2 cell line, including two triterpenes (arborinol and isoarborinol) and four flavonoid-C-glycosides (vicenin-II, orientin, vitexin, and isovitexin), in a concentration-dependent manner. The percentage cell viability at ten different concentrations were used to prepare the dose response curves of these compounds (supporting data, Fig. S28) and to calculate IC50 values of the investigated samples which are listed in Table 1. The ethyl acetate fraction showed the highest activity against both HepG-2 and HCT-116 cell lines, with IC50 values of 42.2 and 59.9 µg/mL, respectively. Regarding MCF-7 cell line, the n-hexane fraction showed the highest cytotoxic activity (IC50 value of 113 µg/mL). Among investigated compounds, vicenin-II (7) and isovitexin (13) showed the highest cytotoxic activity, with IC50 values of 14.38 and 15.39 µg/mL, respectively.

Table 1 Cytotoxic activity (IC50 values) of the crude extract, fractions, and certain compounds of DP via MTT assay against HCT-116, MCF-7, and HepG-2
Full size table

The molecular docking study provided extensive insight into binding patterns for the investigated compounds in the active site of target enzymes and linked the observed in vitro activity with binding scores. Concerning topoisomerase IIα, docking protocol was validated by re-docking of the co-crystalized etoposide at the active site of topoisomerase IIα (PDB ID: 5gwk). The re-docking RMSD = 0.8637 Å and binding score = −7.67 kcal/mol. All the key interactions accomplished by the co-crystalized ligand with the key amino acids in the binding site were reproducible using the followed docking setup. The validated docking setup was then used to investigate the ligand-receptor interactions and binding patterns for the designed compounds which then compared to that of etoposide in its active site (Fig. 2, supporting data, Fig. S29–S31). The amino acid residues and nitrogenous bases of DNA involved in interaction at binding site with co-crystallized etoposide are Lys A723, Arg A713, Gly A462, Met A766, and DG B13 [22], where the main interaction is H-bonding with amino acid residues and nitrogenous bases. From docking investigation, all isolated compounds interact with the same amino acids as co-crystallized etoposide at different poses, where the common interactions among investigated compounds are H-bond with Met A766 and Arg A713 residues, respectively, with average length of 2.63 and 2.71 Å, H-bond or π-cation interactions with Lys A723 and H-bond with DNA bases DT B15 and DG B13. Beside previously mentioned main interactions, isolated compounds interacted with additional amino acids and nitrogenous bases of DNA as extra binding interactions which formed and mediated by H-bonding and π-H bonding interactions as shown in (supporting data, Table S1). These extra interactions played an important role in stabilizing formed ligand-enzyme-DNA complex and that justified lower binding scores of isolated compounds than etoposide, specifically compounds rutin (8) (H-bond with Ser A714 and Ile A856), kaempferol-3-O-neohesperidoside (9) (π-H bond with His A759) and vicenin-II (7) (H-bond with His A759 and Glu A461). The 2D and 3D interactions of the most active compound 7 with topoisomerase IIα (PDB ID: 5gwk) is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

2D (A) and 3D (B) interactions of compound 7 with topoisomerase IIα (PDB ID: 5gwk)

Full size image

For cyclin-dependent kinase 2, docking protocol was validated by re-docking of the co-crystalized sunitinib at the active site of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (PDB ID: 3ti1). The re-docking RMSD = 0.9424 Å and binding score = −7.62 kcal/mol. All the key interactions accomplished by the co-crystalized ligand with the key amino acids in the binding site were reproducible using the followed docking setup. The validated docking setup was then used to investigate the ligand-receptor interactions and binding patterns for the designed compounds which then compared to that of sunitinib in its active site (Fig. 3, supporting data, Fig. S32–S34). Studying the interaction between cyclin-dependent kinase 2 enzyme and co-crystallized sunitinib at active site revealed that amino acid residues involved in the binding are Asp86, Glu81, Ile10, and Ala144 [23] where the main interactions are H-bonding between with Asp86 with length equal to 1.67 Å, H-bond with Ile10 with length of 1.89 Å, H-bonding with Glu81 with length of 2.01Å and π-H bond with Ala144 residue. The docking investigation showed that most docked compounds interact with the most of amino acids involved in interaction with co-crystallized inhibitor sunitinib at different poses, but the common residues are Asp86, Ile10 and Ala144. Most investigated compounds formed H-bond with Asp86, Glu8, Gln131, and Lys89 residues, respectively, with average lengths of 1.81, 1.79, 1.75 and 2.13 Å and π-H bond with Ala144 and Ile10 residues. In addition to these main interactions, isolated compounds interacted with additional amino acids as extra binding interactions which mediated by H-bonding and π-H bonding interactions such as Glu8, Glu12, Leu83, and Asp145. These extra interactions contributed to lower binding scores of the isolated compounds than sunitinib which observed with compounds vitexin (12) (π-H bond with Val18), rutin (8) (H-bond with Glu12 and Leu298), isoquercetrin (10) (π-H bond with Val18 and H-bond with Glu81) and vicenin-II (7) (H-bond with Glu12 and Lys89), reflecting their higher binding affinity with cyclin-dependent kinase 2 enzyme, and the high probability of cytotoxic activity of the isolated compounds through inhibition of both cyclin-dependent kinase 2 and topoisomerase IIα enzymes. The 2D and 3D binding pattern of compound 7 with cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (PDB ID: 3ti1) is depicted in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

2D (A) and 3D (B) interactions of compound 7 with cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (PDB ID: 3ti1)

Full size image

Discussion

The phytochemical investigation resulted in thirteen compounds identified for the first time from DP, which could be employed for chemotaxonomic studies. The n-hexane fraction yielded three compounds (1–3). Compounds 1 and 2 were found to be arborane-type triterpenes, namely arborinol (1) and isoarborinol (2). Notably, they were isolated from the Arecaceae family member, Acrocomia totai [24]. Compound 3 was identified as a mixture of the two closely related sterols, stigmasterol (3a) and β-sitosterol (3b). Other three compounds were isolated from the CH2Cl2 fraction, and identified as kaempferol (4), quercetin (5), and β-sitosterol-3-O-β-d-glucopyranoside (6). The EtOAc fraction afforded seven compounds (7–13). Compounds 7, 11, 12, and 13 were found to be a family of flavonoid-C-glycosides and identified as apigenin-6,8-di-C-β-d-glucopyranoside (vicenin-II), luteolin-8-C-β-d-glucopyranoside (orientin), apigenin-8-C-β-d-glucopyranoside (vitexin) and apigenin-6-C-β-d-glucopyranoside (isovitexin), respectively. These flavone-C-glycosides were previously isolated from two related species, D. lutescens [4] and D. leptocheilos [5]. Compounds 8–10 were identified as the flavonoid-O-glycosides, rutin, kaempferol-3-O-neohesperidoside, and isoquercetrin, respectively. These findings possess chemotaxonomic significance and offer various unique biomarkers since this is the first report for the isolation of eight compounds (1–6, 8 and 10) from the genus Dypsis and the isolation of kaempferol-3-O-neohesperidoside (9) from family Arecaceae.

To our knowledge, this is the first time for investigation of vicenin-II against HepG-2. Supporting these findings, vicenin-II has inhibited the growth of prostate cancer (PC-3, DU-145 and LNCaP cells) in vitro [25, 26], inducing apoptosis in human colon cancer cell line (HT-29) [27] and inhibited cancer metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma cells [28]. Orientin showed cytotoxic activity against HepG-2 [29,30,31] and showed cytotoxic activity against HT-29 [32], human cervix carcinoma (HeLa) [33] and human bladder carcinoma cell lines (T24) [34]. Vitexin showed cytotoxic activity against HepG-2 (IC50 = 92.08 μg/mL) [35,36,37,38,39]. Moreover, it exhibited cytotoxic activity against rat brain tumor (C6), HeLa, HT-29 and African green monkey kidney epithelium (Vero) cell lines [40]. Isovitexin showed cytotoxic activity against HepG-2 (IC50 = 21.70 μg/mL) and showed cytotoxic activity against human laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (Hep-2), HeLa and MCF-7 cell lines [41]. Arborinol and isoarborinol showed cytotoxic activity against HepG-2, with IC50 values of >100 μg/mL and IC50 = 96.41 μg/mL, respectively. Furthermore, these triterpenes showed cytotoxic activity against HeLa, human lung adenocarcinoma (LU-1), human breast cancer (MDA-MB-231) and human tubular adenocarcinoma (MKN7) cell lines [38]. The cytotoxic activity of the crude extract and four fractions were tested against HCT-116, MCF-7, and HepG-2 cell lines by MTT assay, using vinblastine sulfate as a standard in a concentration-dependent manner.

Our docking study with topoisomerase IIα showed that the in vitro cytotoxic activity of vicenin-II (7), orientin (11), vitexin (12), and isovitexin (13) against HepG-2 cell line went in line with the docking results. Since these flavonoid-C-glycosides vicenin-II (7), orientin (11), vitexin (12) and isovitexin (13) showed the lowest IC50 values of 14.38, 82.98, 47.93, and 15.39 µg/mL, respectively, which were consistent with low binding scores of these compounds on topoisomerase IIα enzyme that were −8.52, −7.83, −7.88, and −7.51 kcal/mol, respectively. Vicenin-II (7) showed the highest cytotoxic activity, reflected from its high binding affinity with topoisomerase IIα and promising IC50 value of 14.38 µg/ml. This activity could be justified by observations that 4''' OH group of sugar at C-6 forms H-bond with Gly A729 and Arg A713, 3'' OH and 4'' OH groups of sugar at C-8 form H-bonds with Met A766 and DC B14, respectively. Furthermore, aromatic ring B forms π-H bond with DG B13. While isovitexin (13) showed lower binding affinity than vicenin-II (7) and that explained by the lack of sugar moiety at C-8, but it still has higher promising activity than those of orientin (11) and vitexin (12), because the sugar moiety exists at C-6, while in orientin (11) and vitexin (12) present at C-8, and 3''' OH of C-6 sugar forms H-bond with Lys A489 and DT B15. In addition, aromatic ring B forms π-cation bond with Lys A723 and 4' OH group forms H-bond with Asn A770 (Aspragine) residue. Both orientin (11) and vitexin (12) exerted the same interactions, but vitexin (12) had lower binding score and IC50 values and that due to H-bond formation between 4' OH of aromatic ring B and DG B13. Furthermore, vicenin-II (7) showed the highest cytotoxic activity indicated from its lower binding score with cyclin-dependent kinase 2 and promising IC50 value of 14.38 µg/mL, which attributed to H-bonds between 4''' OH and 6''' OH groups of C-6 sugar with Lys89 and Asp86, respectively. Moreover, 6'' and 2'' OH groups form H-bond with Glu12 and Gln131, and aromatic ring B forms π-H bond with Ala144 residue. Where isovitexin (13) showed the same interactions as vicenin-II (7), with exception of H-bonds with Glu12 and Gln131 due to absence of sugar moiety at C-8 and that justified lower binding affinity and biological activity of isovitexin (13) than vicenin-II (7). Vitexin (12) had higher activity than orientin (11) because vitexin (12) showed interactions similar to that of vicenin-II (7) such as H-bonds with Lys89 and Gln131 and π-H bond with Ala144 residue. The docking of the isolated compounds gave good binding scores which were consistent with their in vitro cytotoxic activity against HepG-2 cell line. Specifically, compounds vicenin-II (7), orientin (11), vitexin (12) and isovitexin (13) that had IC50 values of 14.38, 82.98, 47.93 and 15.39 µg/mL, respectively, were highly correlated with their binding scores that were −8.67, −7.65, −8.31 and −8.12, kcal/mol, respectively.

Conclusions

Thirteen compounds were first reported from Dypsis pembana. Vicenin-II and isovitexin, two flavonoid-C-glycosides, demonstrated promising cytotoxic activities against HepG-2 cell line, offering lead scaffold for further development of modified structures with enhanced activity. It was shown that one of the key elements affecting these flavonoid-C-glycosides' ability to exert cytotoxic effects is the number and location of their sugar moieties. Thus, additional in vivo studies are required to confirm the cytotoxic action of these compounds.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information file.

Abbreviations

HCT-116:

Human colon carcinoma cell line

MCF-7:

Human breast carcinoma cell line

HepG-2:

Human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line

MTT:

3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromide

VLC:

Vacuum Liquid Chromatography

CC:

Column Chromatography

IC50 :

50% inhibitory concentration

SD:

Standard deviation

MOE:

Molecular Operating Environment

HT-29:

Human colon cancer cell line

HeLa:

Human cervix carcinoma cell line

CH2Cl2 :

Dichloromethane

EtOAc:

Ethyl acetate

References

  1. Pardee AB, Stein GS. The biology and treatment of cancer: Understanding cancer. John Wiley & Sons; 2011.

  2. Ibrahim AS, Khaled HM, Mikhail NNH, Baraka H, Kamel H. Cancer incidence in Egypt: results of the national population-based cancer registry program. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2014;2014.

  3. Dransfield J, Beentje H. The palms of Madagascar. Royal Botanic Gardens; 1995.

  4. El-Ghonemy MM, El-Kashak WA, Mohamed TK, Omara EA, Hussein J, Farrag ARH, et al. Hepatoprotective activity of Dypsis lutescens against D-galactosamine-induced hepatotoxicity in rats and its phytoconstituents. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2019;9:467–73.

  5. Ibrahim HA, Elsharawy FS, Elhassab M, Shabana S, Haggag EG. Phytochemical screening and biological evaluation of Dypsis leptocheilos leaves extract and molecular docking study of the isolated compounds. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2020;12:106–13.

  6. Quattrocchi U. CRC World Dictionary of Palms: Common Names, Scientific Names, Eponyms, Synonyms, and Etymology Volume I Arecaceae A–G. CRC Press; 2018.

  7. Abdelrahim MS, Abdel-Baky AM, Backheet EY, Bayoumi SAL. Botanical study and fatty acids characterization of the leaves of Dypsis pembana (HE MOORE) BEENTJE &J. DRANSF. family Arecaceae cultivated in Egypt. Bull Pharm Sci Assiut. 2022;45:99–118.

  8. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65:55–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Riyadh SM, Gomha SM, Mahmmoud EA, Elaasser MM. Synthesis and Anticancer Activities of Thiazoles, 1, 3‐Thiazines, and Thiazolidine Using Chitosan‐Grafted‐Poly (vinylpyridine) as Basic Catalyst. Heterocycles. 2015;91:1227-43.

  10. https://www.rcsb.org/structure/5GWK. Accessed on 5 Sept 2022.

  11. https://www.rcsb.org/structure/3TI1. Accessed on 5 Sept 2022.

  12. Chakravarty AK, Masuda K, Suzuki H, Ageta H. Unambiguous assignment of 13C chemical shifts of some hopane and migrated hopane derivatives by 2D NMR. Tetrahedron. 1994;50:2865–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun X-B, Zhao P-H, Xu Y-J, Sun L-M, Cao M-A, Yuan C-S. Chemical constituents from the roots of Polygonum bistorta. Chem Nat Compd. 2007;43:563–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cayme J-MC, Ragasa CY. Structure elucidation of β-stigmasterol and β-sitosterol from Sesbania grandifora [Linn.] Pers. and β-carotene from Heliotropium indicum Linn. by NMR spectroscopy. Kimika. 2004;20:5–12.

  15. Markham KR, Chari VM. Carbon-13 NMR Spectroscopy of Flavonoids. In: Harborne JB, Mabry TJ, editors. The Flavonoids: Advances in Research. Boston, MA: Springer, US; 1982. p. 19–134.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Khatun M, Billah M, Quader MA. Sterols and sterol glucoside from Phyllanthus species. Dhaka Univ J Sci. 2012;60:5–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu Y, Foo LY. Flavonoid and phenolic glycosides from Salvia officinalis. Phytochemistry. 2000;55:263–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Shabibi MHS, Al-Touby SSJ, Hossain MA. Isolation, characterization and prediction of biologically active glycoside compounds quercetin-3-rutinoside from the fruits of Ficus sycomorus. Carbohydr Res. 2022;511:108483.

  19. Sohn S-J, Kwon Y-S, Kim S-S, Chun W-J, Kim C-M. Chemical constituents of the leaves of Staphylea bumalda. Nat Prod Sci. 2004;10:173–6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ahn S, Jung H, Jung Y, Lee J, Shin SY, Lim Y, et al. Identification of the active components inhibiting the expression of matrix metallopeptidase-9 by TNFα in ethyl acetate extract of Euphorbia humifusa Willd. J Appl Biol Chem. 2019;62:367–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pang S, Ge Y, Wang LS, Liu X, Lin CW, Yang H. Isolation and purification of orientin and isovitexin from Thlaspi arvense Linn. In: Advanced materials research. Trans Tech Publ; 2013. p. 615–8.

  22. Wang YR, Chen SF, Wu CC, Liao YW, Lin TS, Liu KT, et al. Producing irreversible topoisomerase II-mediated DNA breaks by site-specific Pt(II)-methionine coordination chemistry. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:10861–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Martin MP, Alam R, Betzi S, Ingles DJ, Zhu JY, Schönbrunn E. A novel approach to the discovery of small-molecule ligands of CDK2. ChemBioChem. 2012;13:2128–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Souza GK, Kischkel B, Freitas CF, Negri M, Back D, Johann G, et al. Antiproliferative activity and energy calculations of a new triterpene isolated from the palm tree Acrocomia totai. Nat Prod Res. 2021;35:4225–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nagaprashantha LD, Vatsyayan R, Singhal J, Fast S, Roby R, Awasthi S, et al. Anti-cancer effects of novel flavonoid vicenin-2 as a single agent and in synergistic combination with docetaxel in prostate cancer. Biochem Pharmacol. 2011;82:1100–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Singhal SS, Jain D, Singhal P, Awasthi S, Singhal J, Horne D. Targeting the mercapturic acid pathway and vicenin-2 for prevention of prostate cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA)-Reviews Cancer. 2017;1868:167–75.

  27. Yang D, Zhang X, Zhang W, Rengarajan T. Vicenin-2 inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signaling and induces apoptosis in HT-29 human colon cancer cell line. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018;12:1303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Luo Y, Ren Z, Du B, Xing S, Huang S, Li Y, et al. Structure identification of viceninII extracted from Dendrobium officinale and the reversal of TGF-β1-induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition in lung adenocarcinoma cells through TGF-β/Smad and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways. Molecules. 2019;24:144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Li Y, Yu-chen WU, Xiao-meng REN, Xue-bo LIU. Comparison of antioxidant activities and cytotoxicity in hepG2 cells of orientin and isoorientin. J Food Sci Technol. 2014;31:21–7.

    Google Scholar 

  30. LIN J. Chemical constituents of whole plants of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum and their antitumor activities. Chinese Pharm J. 2015:658–63.

  31. Sharma P, Prakash O, Shukla A, Singh Rajpurohit C, G Vasudev P, Luqman S, et al. Structure-activity relationship studies on holy basil (Ocimum sanctum L.) based flavonoid orientin and its analogue for cytotoxic activity in liver cancer cell line HepG2. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2016;19:656–66.

  32. Thangaraj K, Balasubramanian B, Park S, Natesan K, Liu W, Manju V. Orientin induces G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and mitochondria mediated intrinsic apoptosis in human colorectal carcinoma HT29 cells. Biomolecules. 2019;9:418.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Guo Q, Tian X, Yang A, Zhou Y, Wu D, Wang Z. Orientin in Trollius chinensis Bunge inhibits proliferation of HeLa human cervical carcinoma cells by induction of apoptosis. Monatshefte für Chemie-Chemical Mon. 2014;145:229–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tian F, Tong M, Li Z, Huang W, Jin Y, Cao Q, et al. The effects of orientin on proliferation and apoptosis of T24 human bladder carcinoma cells occurs through the inhibition of nuclear factor-kappaB and the hedgehog signaling pathway. Med Sci Monit Int Med J Exp Clin Res. 2019;25:9547.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cui Y, Zhao Z, Liu Z, Liu J, Piao C, Liu D. Purification and identification of buckwheat hull flavonoids and its comparative evaluation on antioxidant and cytoprotective activity in vitro. Food Sci Nutr. 2020;8:3882–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Mohammed RS, Abou Zeid AH, El Hawary SS, Sleem AA, Ashour WE. Flavonoid constituents, cytotoxic and antioxidant activities of Gleditsia triacanthos L. leaves. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2014;21:547–53.

  37. Nagah N, Mostafa I, Osman A, Dora G, El-Sayed Z, Ateya A-M. Bioguided isolation and in-silico analysis of Hep-G2 cytotoxic constituents from Laurus nobilis Linn. cultivated in Egypt. Egypt J Chem. 2021;64:2731–45.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nguyen PQD. In vitro cytotoxic activity of constituents of the aerial parts of Glycosmis parviflora. Trop J Nat Prod Res. 2020;4:703–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang J, Zheng X, Zeng G, Zhou Y, Yuan H. Purified vitexin compound 1 inhibits growth and angiogenesis through activation of FOXO3a by inactivation of Akt in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Mol Med. 2014;33:441–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Erenler R, Meral B, Sen O, Elmastas M, Aydin A, Eminagaoglu O, et al. Bioassay-guided isolation, identification of compounds from Origanum rotundifolium and investigation of their antiproliferative and antioxidant activities. Pharm Biol. 2017;55:1646–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Farid MM, Hussein SR, Ibrahim LF, El Desouky MA, Elsayed AM, El Oqlah AA, et al. Cytotoxic activity and phytochemical analysis of Arum palaestinum Boiss. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2015;5:944–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors prompt their sincere thanks to Eng. Rabia Sharwy, General manager of Al-Abed company and technical consultant to the company Palm Garden, for supplying the plant, and to Trease Labib, consultant of plant taxonomy at Ministry of Agriculture and exit- director of El-Orman Garden, Giza, Egypt, for identification of the plant.

Plant ethics

The plant was identified by Dr. Trease Labib (consultant of plant taxonomy at Ministry of Agriculture and exit- director of El-Orman Garden, Giza, Egypt). Voucher specimen (Aun-Phg-0002016) was kept in Pharmacognosy Department Herbarium, Faculty of Pharmacy, Assiut University. This experiment was carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Permission to collect plant material was obtained from Al-Abed company.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Assiut University, Assiut, 71526, Egypt

    Mohamed S. Abdelrahim, Afaf M. Abdel-Baky, Soad A. L. Bayoumi, Shaymaa M. Mohamed, Wael M. Abdel-Mageed & Enaam Y. Backheet

  2. Department of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia

    Wael M. Abdel-Mageed

Authors
  1. Mohamed S. Abdelrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Afaf M. Abdel-Baky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Soad A. L. Bayoumi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shaymaa M. Mohamed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wael M. Abdel-Mageed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Enaam Y. Backheet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.M.A., E.Y.B. and S.A.L.B. are responsible for the aim of the study, selection of the plant and participated in the data analysis. M.S.A. performed extraction, fractionation of the plant, isolation of the compounds, biological analysis, molecular docking study and participated in the data analysis. W.M.A. and S.M.M. performed the NMR experiments and participated in the data analysis. The final manuscript of the work was reviewed and approved by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed S. Abdelrahim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdelrahim, M.S., Abdel-Baky, A.M., Bayoumi, S.A.L. et al. Cytotoxic flavone-C-glycosides from the leaves of Dypsis pembana (H.E.Moore) Beentje & J.Dransf., Arecaceae: in vitro and molecular docking studies. BMC Complement Med Ther 23, 214 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04046-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04046-0

Keywords

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies

ISSN: 2662-7671

Contact us