Skip to main content
Download PDF

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 potential of Cissampelos pareira L. identified by connectivity map-based analysis and in vitro studies

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies volume 22, Article number: 114 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Viral infections have a history of abrupt and severe eruptions through the years in the form of pandemics. And yet, definitive therapies or preventive measures are not present. Herbal medicines have been a source of various antiviral compounds such as Oseltamivir, extracted using shikimic acid from star anise (Illicium verum) and Acyclovir from Carissa edulis are FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved antiviral drugs. In this study, we dissect the anti-coronavirus infection activity of Cissampelos pareira L (Cipa) extract using an integrative approach.

Methods

We analysed the signature similarities between predicted antiviral agents and Cipa using the connectivity map (https://clue.io/). Next, we tested the anti-SARS-COV-2 activity of Cipa in vitro. Molecular docking analyses of constituents of with key targets of SARS-CoV2 protein viz. spike protein, RNA‑dependent RNA‑polymerase (RdRp) and 3C‑like proteinase. was also performed. A three-way comparative analysis of Cipa transcriptome, COVID-19 BALF transcriptome and CMAP signatures of small compounds was also performed.

Results

Several predicted antivirals showed a high positive connectivity score with Cipa such as apcidin, emetine, homoharringtonine etc. We also observed 98% inhibition of SARS-COV-2 replication in infected Vero cell cultures with the whole extract. Some of its prominent pure constituents e.g. pareirarine, cissamine, magnoflorine exhibited 40–80% inhibition. Comparison of genes between BALF and Cipa showed an enrichment of biological processes like transcription regulation and response to lipids, to be downregulated in Cipa while being upregulated in COVID-19. CMAP also showed that Triciribine, torin-1 and VU-0365114–2 had positive connectivity with BALF 1 and 2, and negative connectivity with Cipa. Amongst all the tested compounds, Magnoflorine and Salutaridine exhibited the most potent and consistent strong in silico binding profiles with SARS-CoV2 therapeutic targets.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

SARS-CoV-2, the severe acquired respiratory syndrome agent coronavirus 2, has taken many lives in the past year and is continuing to create an unsafe environment. Along with numerous mutations emphasizing the quasispecies nature of the virus [1, 2], fast transmission and a wide range of symptoms, lack of a definite therapeutic intervention has made this virus all the more deadly. Due to the ongoing mutations new variants such as Delta variants emerge with higher or different COVID-19 manifestations [3]. Many studies have been conducted in order to recognize small compound therapeutics effective against SARS-CoV-2. Interestingly, some estrogen receptor modulators and protein synthesis inhibitors having potential antiviral against SARS-CoV2 have also been identified [4]. It has been shown that ESR1 as a drug target can modulate certain coronavirus associated genes. A group recently demonstrated the downregulation of ACE2 (Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2) by estrogen [5]. It has been shown that ACE-2 protein on the epithelial surface is the primary entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2 [6].

Several herbal medicines and natural sources have been used to isolate antiviral compounds. Some of the examples of FDA approved antivirals from natural sources include Oseltamivir from star anise (Illicium verum) and Acyclovir from Carissa eduli [7]. Cissampelos pareira L. is a commonly used hormone modulator which is used to treat reproductive disorders and fever in Ayurveda and also other healing systems. It has also been found to inhibit three serotypes of dengue [8] and its effect on various hormones has also been evidenced [9]. In a previous study we have observed that Cipa can act as both, a protein synthesis inhibitor and an estrogen receptor inhibitor [10]. Many of the drugs positively connected with Cipa have been reported to be a potential antiviral agent. Since there were several overlaps between the therapeutics predicted to be effective against SARS-CoV-2 and our formulation, we decided explore the repurposing potential of Cipa for this current pandemic. We found that Cipa can inhibit viral replication and Cipa compounds could directly to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, RNA‑dependent RNA‑polymerase (RdRp) and 3C‑like proteinase.

Material and methods

Transcriptome meta-analysis

We obtained the raw RNA sequencing data from SARS-CoV-2 patients Broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) 1 and 2 from the recent publications and analyzed them inhouse (Supplementary information 1.1). The gene expression data for Cissampelos pareira L. was taken from [10], which can be accessed at GSE156445.

Functional enrichment and connectivity map of the differentially expressed genes

The differentially expressed genes were analyzed for functional enrichment using enrichr [11] and for similar signatures using clue.io [12]. The results were then compared with Cipa to find intersections between gene ontologies, enriched gene sets, and connectivity map perturbations between upregulated genes of BALF 1 and 2 and downregulated genes of Cipa and between downregulated genes of BALF 1 and 2 and upregulated genes of Cipa. Enrichments were also done for the genes whose knockdown signatures score > 90 connectivity with Cipa and then compared with the upregulated processes and gene sets in SARS-CoV-2.

Collection of plant material and preparation of extract for in vitro inhibition assays

Whole plant of Cissampelos pareira L was collected from the campus of CSIR-IHBT, Palampur, HP, India (alt. 1350 m) following biodiversity guidelines. The identification of the plant material was done by a taxonomy expert in CSIR-IHBT, Palampur and a voucher specimen (no. PLP16688) was deposited in the herbarium of CSIR-IHBT, Palampur, HP-176,061, India. The plant has been obtained and isolated as per CSIR, India guidelines (details for extract preparation in Supplementary information 1.2). The pure molecules from roots of the plant were isolated as reported recently [13].

Cell culture, viral infection and drug treatment for inhibition of SARS-COV-2 by Cipa

The effect of PE50 and PER was tested against the SARS-CoV2 (ASTM, 2015) in a 96-well tissue culture plates that was seeded with Vero Cells which were obtained from ATCC (CCL-81) 24 h prior to infection with SARS-CoV2 (Indian/a3i clade/2020 isolate) in BSL3 facility. After treatment, RNA was isolated using MagMAXTM Viral/Pathogen Extraction Kit (Applied Biosystems, Thermofisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The details of the experiment and RNA isolation protocol are given in the Supplementary information 1.3.

TaqMan real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2

The detection of genes specific to SARS-CoV2 was done using COVID-19 RT-qPCR Detection Kit (Fosun 2019-nCoV qPCR, Shanghai Fosun Long March Medical Science Co. Ltd.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (details in Supplementary information 1.4). The calculations for the relative viral RNA content and log reduced viral particles was calculated using the linear regression equation obtained using the RNA extracted from the known viral particles by RT-qPCR, using N, E and ORF1ab genes specific to SARS CoV2 virus. from the test sample [14].

Docking of Cipa constituent compounds to key SARS-CoV-2 drug targets

The catalytic groove of SARS-CoV2 3C-like protease (3CL-pro) was identified from the high resolution crystal structure of the enzyme (PDB Id: 6WTJ) [15]. Autodock Vina [16] which uses Lamarckian Genetic Algorithm method was used to perform in silico docking simulations of the Cipa bioactive compounds at the active site of 3CL-pro. Molecular Graphic Laboratory tools (MGL tools) were used to add polar hydrogens, Gasteiger charges and finally to prepare the pdbqt file of the receptor protomer. The coordinate files of the Cipa bioactive compounds were retrieved from PubChem [17] in sdf format and was later converted to pdb format using Pymol [18]. Again, the MGL tools were used to fix the number of rotatable bonds of the ligand molecules and finally to prepare the corresponding ligand pdbqt files. The targeted docking of the Cipa bioactive compounds at the active site pocket of the 3CL-pro receptor was carried out using grid box size of: 50 Å × 60 Å × 56 Å with corresponding X center, Y center and Z center values of -13.399, 15.281 and 68.785 respectively. The docking was caried out with the grid spacing of 0.374 Å. Amongst the nine docking poses obtained after each run of autodock vina, the best pose was selected for each tested ligands based on their calculated free energy of binding values (∆Gbinding).

The docking of the four aforementioned Cipa bioactive compounds at the other two SARS-CoV2 principal therapeutic targets (Replicating RNA polymerase and Spike RBD) were also carried out similarly. Especially the targeted docking with RBD of SARS-CoV2 spike protein was initiated after identification of the ACE2/RBD interface, obtained through PDBePISA analysis of the crystal structure, 6M0J. Accordingly, the targeted docking was carried out using grid box size of 32 Å × 90 Å × 58 Å with corresponding X center, Y center and Z center values of 6.743, -18.516 and 68.846 respectively. The docking was caried out with the grid spacing of 0.374 Å and the best pose of each tested ligand was selected based on the calculated free energy of binding (∆Gbinding).

Prior to the docking simulation of the principal Cipa bioactive compounds with the RBD of SARS-CoV2 delta variant, the receptor spike protein was modelled by homology modelling (Fig. S4). For the homology modelling of delta (B.1.617.2) variant of SARS-CoV2 spike protein, the sequence information was retrieved from Uniprot [19]. Spike mutations found in Delta Variant include T19R, (V70F*), T95I, G142D, E156-, F157-, R158G, (A222V*), (W258L*), (K417N*), L452R, T478K, D614G, P681R, D950N [20]. The mutant sequence was generated by introducing these amino-acid substitutions in the native spike sequence, which was later used for generating models using Modeller [21]. Once again, Autodock Vina was used to carry out the docking simulation with the grid box size of of 92 Å × 86 Å × 82 Å and with corresponding X center, Y center and Z center values of 147.356, 141.304 and 59.176 respectively.

The receptor-ligand interactions involved in every docked complex were visualized using Pymol [18] and LigPlot + [22].

Results

Cissampelos pareira L. shows high positive connectivity with small compounds predicted to inhibit SARS-CoV-2

To assess which among the numerous small compounds predicted to have antiviral potential against SARS-CoV2 in various studies might have similar signatures among the same cell lines as Cipa, we queried the connectivity map. We observed 7 small compounds to possess high signature similarity with Cipa. These include emetine (99.61), anisomycin (99.58), cycloheximide (99.86), homoharringtonine (99.51), apcidin (86.32), ruxolitinib (91.54), and sirolimus (95.45). These small compounds were predicted using different methods in four independent studies (Table 1).

Table 1 Connectivity scores of small compounds with repurposing potential against SARS-CoV-2 as predicted by various studies
Full size table

Cipa whole extract and single molecule constituents can inhibit SARS-COV-2 in vitro

Since metanalysis highlighted an inhibitory potential of Cipa against SARS-COV-2, we tested the effect of whole plant and root extracts of Cipa in Vero cell culture assays infected with SARS-CoV-2. The relative viral RNA (%) was calculated by considering the values averaged from N (Nucleoprotein), ORF1ab (19 non-structural proteins, NSP1-16), and E (Envelope) viral genes. The whole plant aqueous extract showed a definite antiviral activity, evidenced by decreased relative viral RNA content with a reduction by 57% at 100 µg/ml where the viral particle number reduced from 105.9 to 105.6 (Fig. 1A-C).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro by Cipa whole extract and its constituents: Relative viral RNA % and Log reduction in viral particles in vero cells upon treatment at 50, 100, 150 and 200 μg of A) whole plant aqueous extract (PE), B) root extract (PER) and C) hydro-alcoholic extracts (PE50) of Cipa. D Sars-cov-2 viral titers inhibition by Cipa constituents CP-2 Salutaridine, CP-3 Cissamine, CP-5 pareirarine, CP-7 Magnoflorine, PE aqueous extract, PE50 50% hydroalcoholic extract and PER root extract. The error bars have been represented in the figures with (p < 0.05) and the experiments were done in triplicates

Full size image

Next, we wanted to see whether the Cipa pure constituents can inhibit SARS-COV-2. The total alkaloid content in the extract was 46.4 mg/g with cissamine (18.6 mg/g) being the major one, followed by magnoflorine (12.9 mg/g). The pure molecules namely hayatinin (US-50), salutaridine (US-DR-CP-2), cissamine (US-CP-3), pareirarine (US-CP-5), magnoflorine (US-CP-7), aqueous whole plant extract (PE), 50% hydroalcoholic whole plant extract (PE50) and 50% hydroalcoholic root extract (PER) were tested against SARS-CoV2 at 200 µM concentration showed relative viral RNA (%) to 44, 58, 45, 16, 63, 24, 2 and 2 respectively in comparison with the virus control (Fig. 1D). The structure of these constituent compounds is given in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Molecular structures of the major components of the compounds isolated from Cipa and used to determine anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity

Full size image

Cipa bioactive compounds bind pivotal SARS-CoV2 therapeutic targets

In order to establish the molecular mechanism of action of principal Cipa bioactive compounds which manifested SARS-CoV2 inhibition in vitro (Magnoflorine, Pareiramine, Salutaridine and Cissamine), we tested their ability to bind principal drug target proteins of SARS-CoV2 in silico (3C like protease, replicating RNA polymerase and Receptor Binding Domain of viral spike protein). Amongst all the tested compounds, Magnoflorine and Salutaridine exhibited the most potent and consistent strong in silico binding profiles with SARS-CoV2 therapeutic targets (Fig. 3). Magnoflorine was found to bind SARS-CoV2 3C-like protease (3CL-pro) with excellent profile of ∆Gbinding (-7.3 kcal/mol) comparable to GC373 (-7.3 kcal/mol), one of the well-established synthetic 3CL-pro inhibitor [15] tested as the positive control under the same docking simulation conditions. Moreover, Magnoflorine and GC373 share the common binding sites at the evolutionary conserved active site catalytic groove of 3CL-pro (Fig. 3A and Fig. S2) in close proximity of the Cys145-His41 catalytic dyad. Both of these tested compounds bind the active site amino acid residues of 3CL -pro through an extensive array of hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interaction networks.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Cipa principal bioactive compounds bind crucial SARS-CoV2 therapeutic targets. A represents molecular docking of Magnoflorine at the active site pocket of SARS-CoV2 3C-like protease. B represents molecular docking of Salutaridine with ACE2 interacting amino acid residues of Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) from SARS-Cov2 spike protein. The middle and the right panels of each figure represent the zoomed in view of the molecular interaction patterns of the docked ligands in three-dimensional and two-dimensional spaces respectively. In the two-dimensional interaction plots, the green dotted lines indicate hydrogen bond formation, whereas the hydrophobic interactions are represented by the spiked arcs

Full size image

Intriguingly, all the tested Cipa bioactive compounds were found to dock with the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV2 spike protein (Fig. S3), another crucial target for anti-SARS-CoV2 therapeutic intervention. The free energy of binding (∆Gbinding) ranges from -7.1 kcal/mol to -5.6 kcal/mol from best to worst binding ligands. Amongst the all tested compounds, Salutaridine was found to exhibit the most potent and consistent strong binding profile (∆Gbinding -7.1 kcal/mol) (Fig. 3B). Importantly, the binding of Cipa ligands at the RBD engages the same set of amino acid residues which are responsible for the SARS-CoV2 spike interaction with receptor ACE2 (PDB ID: 6M0J). Moreover, Salutaridine binding at the RBD is found to be structurally reminiscent with comparable free energy of binding of H69D1(∆Gbinding -6.8 kcal/mol), a potent spike protein targeting SARS-CoV2 entry blocker (used as the positive control) [26]. The free energy of binding of all tested Cipa bioactive compounds at the RBD-ACE2 interface stabilizing residues are also found to be energetically favourable compared to the free energy of dissociation of RBD-ACE2 complex [∆Gdiss -2.00 kcal/mol; calculated by PDBePISA [27]]. Therefore, all the four Cipa bioactive compounds tested herein can potentially function as SARS-CoV2 entry blocker targeting the RBD of the spike protein.

Unlike the active site catalytic residues of 3CL -pro, the ACE2 interacting residues of RBD are highly variable amongst different SARS-CoV2 pathovariants. In this context, in silico docking of the same set of Cipa bioactive compounds was carried out against the RBD of SARS-CoV2 delta variant. Importantly, in case of the delta variant, the tested Cipa bioactive compounds were found to strongly bind at the distal drug binding hotspot of RBD [28,29,30] (Fig. S4).

Cipa transcriptome oppositely regulates several biological pathways compared to COVID-19 infected patient BALF transcriptome

We looked for the differentially expressed genes which were common between Cipa and BALF samples from two studies [31, 32], hereby referred to as BALF-1 and BALF-2 respectively. We observed that 39 genes were common between Cipa and BALF-1 and BALF-2, out of which 29 showed an opposite expression (Table S1). Individually, 134 genes were common between Cipa and BALF-1, and 174 genes common between Cipa and BALF-2. Upon functional enrichment analysis we observed that the genes enriched for regulation of vascular endothelial growth were upregulated in both BALF-1 and 2 datasets while being downregulated by Cipa. Similarly, while regulation of gene expression was upregulated by Cipa it was downregulated in BALF-1 and BALF-2 data sets (Fig. 4A-C).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Comparative analysis of Cipa with BALF-1 and BALF-2 transcriptome: Functional enrichment of genes common between A) Cipa and BALF-1, B) Cipa and BALF-2 and C) Cipa, BALF-1 and BALF-2. D Small compound signatures common between all three, the space on the left of the vertical axis indicates negative signatures while the one on the right indicates positive signatures. E Genetic signatures common between all three, the space on the left of the vertical axis indicates negative signatures while the one on the right indicates positive signatures

Full size image

The connectivity map analysis of the gene signatures of BALF-1 and BALF-2 comparison with Cipa results revealed a number of small compounds that had high positive scores with Cipa and negative scores with either BALF transcriptomes. We observed several small compounds having opposite signature similarities between Cipa and BALF. Triciribine, torin-1 and VU-0365114–2 were three compounds with negative scores for Cipa and positive scores for both BALF 1 and 2 (Fig. 4D). Also, knockdown signatures of a number of genes were found to exhibit opposing scores between Cipa and BALF transcriptomes. Some of these include, MICALL1, CRK, FKBP1A, CBX4, and FGR10P (Fig. 4E).

Discussion

SARS-COV-2 has shown a very diverse set of clinical presentations in various populations and among genders within the same population. It has been shown that estrogen can regulate the expression of ACE-2 receptors [5]. Although a few known herbal medicines such as extracts of Ganoderma lucidum, Perilla frutescens, and Mentha haplocalyx have been shown to be effective against SARS-CoV-2 infection [33], only Ganoderma lucidum has shown effect on estrogen modulation [34]. Since Cipa appears to have ESR1 modulatory effects [10], and has been shown to have antiviral potential [8], we hypothesized it may have inhibitory effect on the novel coronavirus. CMAP analysis of Cipa transcriptome signatures highlights several small compounds having been predicted to have inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV-2. Among these, emetine, homoharringtonine, and cycloheximide are known translation inhibitors. These have also been shown to inhibit Zika and Ebola [35], SARS and MERS [23], and Newcastle disease virus [36]. Apcidin, an HDAC inhibitor has been predicted to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in a recent study [37].

In vitro experiments for viral inhibition of SARS-COV-2, reveal that all whole plant extracts of Cipa (aqueous and alcoholic) could inhibit the virus at least up to 60%. Hydroalcoholic whole plant extract showed an inhibition of 98%. The single molecule constituents of Cipa could also inhibit the viral particles, with pareirarine showing the highest inhibition of 80%. This showed that Cipa does have the potential to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 virus in vitro. Interestingly, the highest inhibition is shown by the whole plant hydroalcoholic extract which comprises of various small compound constituents. This suggests a synergistic effect of the constituents towards viral inhibition. Interestingly, among the tested constituent compounds, pareiraine was reported for the first time from Cissampelos pareira in a study carried for antiplasmodial activity [13]. Cissamine belongs to the protoberberine class of isoquinoline alkaloids and antiviral activity of cissamine was reported here for the first time. But berberine being the most prominent compound of protoberberine class exhibited antiviral activity against HCV, HPV, HIV-1 [38] and H1N1 influenza A virus [38, 39]. Magnoflorine belongs to the aporphine class of isoquinoline alkaloids and such types of alkaloids are reported to have antiviral activity against Herpes simplex virus [40] and human poliovirus [41]. However, there are no individual reports regarding the antiviral activity of magnoflorine. In one study, methanolic leaves extract of Magnolia grandiflora containing magnoflorine was observed to have high antiviral activity against Herpes simplex virus (HSV-1) and possessed moderate antiviral activity against poliovirus type-1 (PV1) [42].

In silico ligand binding assays clearly indicates the molecular therapeutic mechanism of Cipa bioactive compounds against the tested SARS-CoV2 drug targets. The in silico results presented herein corroborates with in vitro SARS-CoV2 inhibition properties of the tested compounds. Amongst the all tested Cipa compounds against three major SARS-CoV2 therapeutic targets, the 3CL -pro binding inhibitor, holds immense promise in context of its highly conserved binding site in contrast to the rapidly evolving ACE2 binding landscape of the RBD in different viral pathovariants. Furthermore, the observed synergistic antiviral property of Cipa hydroalcholic extracts in vitro, may result from the unique ability of the constituent bioactive molecules to simultaneously target several SARS-CoV2 therapeutic targets as observed in the in silico docking experiments presented here. Importantly, other than the three major viral therapeutic targets tested here, multiple crucial host derived proteins/protein complexes also play trivial role in SARS-CoV2 disease pathogenesis. Structural investigation of bioactive ligand binding to host derived therapeutic targets would further open up new arenas of future anti-SARS-CoV2 therapeutic inventions.

We also found that the signatures of the transcriptomic changes in Cipa treated MCF7 cells and BALF from patients’ lungs, have interesting overlaps. Among the connected small compounds triciribine, torin-1 and VU-0365114–2, triciribine has been shown to inhibit Human Immunodeficiency virus sera types 1 and 2 [43]. Another study has shown that VU-0365114–2, which is a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5 inhibitor, has repurposing potential against SARS-CoV-2 [44]. While mTOR inhibitor torin-1 may modulate immune activity and enhance antiviral response, even against SARS-COV-2 [45].

There are a number of factors which modulate the viral-host interactions which can be explored for better understanding the mechanism of action of promising antivirals such as interactions with the membrane components such as lipid rafts and ACE2, and other key non-structural proteins of the virus [6, 46]. Interestingly, GPER, the G-protein coupled estrogen receptor is often found associated with lipid rafts and have been reported to modulate estrogenic effects in the immune cells [47, 48]. It is worthwhile to note that in our previous study [10], we found that Cipa can down regulate this receptor as well. Since estrogen has been reported to effect covid related disease progression and fatality [5, 49, 50], it will be prudent to study the interaction of GPER and associated lipids in the plasma membrane with viral proteins and explore their potential as drug targets.

Conclusion

In summary, we report here a framework applicable for repurposing of herbal formulations that are used in Ayurveda and other medicinal system using an integrated multi-pronged approach using transcriptome-based connectivity mapping, in vitro validation and conjoint analysis with disease signatures. We demonstrate the potential repurposing of Cissampelos pareira L for SARS-CoV-2 using this approach.

Availability of data and materials

The raw data analysed during the current study are available in publicly available at respective repositories and data centers as follows:

Transcriptomic data of Cissampelos pareira: GEO public repository: GSE156445 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE156445].

Transcriptomic data of SARS-COV-2 BALF: GEO public repository: GSE152075 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE152075] and Genome Warehouse in National Genomics Data Center: PRJCA002273 [https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa-human/browse/HRA000143].

Abbreviations

CMAP:

Connectivity Map

BALF:

Bronchoalveolar Lavage fluid

ESR1:

Estrogen Receptor Alpha

ACE2:

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2

SARS:

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome

MERS:

Middle East respiratory syndrome

HDAC:

Histone deacetylase

References

  1. Sun F, Wang X, Tan S, Dan Y, Lu Y, Zhang J, et al. SARS-CoV-2 quasispecies provides an advantage mutation pool for the epidemic variants. Microbiol Spectr. 2021;9:e0026121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andino R, Domingo E. Viral quasispecies. Virology. 2015;479–480:46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Planas D, Veyer D, Baidaliuk A, Staropoli I, Guivel-Benhassine F, Rajah MM, et al. Reduced sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 variant delta to antibody neutralization. Nature. 2021;596:276–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gordon DE, Jang GM, Bouhaddou M, Xu J, Obernier K, White KM, et al. A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing. Nature. 2020;583(7816):459–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stelzig KE, Canepa-Escaro F, Schiliro M, Berdnikovs S, Prakash YS, Chiarella SE. Estrogen regulates the expression of SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 in differentiated airway epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Mol Physiol. 2020;318:L1280–1. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00153.2020.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Seyran M, Takayama K, Uversky VN, Lundstrom K, Palù G, Sherchan SP, et al. The structural basis of accelerated host cell entry by SARS-CoV-2†. FEBS J. 2021;288:5010–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. De Clercq E, Li G. Approved antiviral drugs over the past 50 years. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016;29:695–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sood R, Raut R, Tyagi P, Pareek PK, Barman TK, Singhal S, et al. Cissampelos pareira Linn: natural source of potent antiviral activity against all four dengue virus serotypes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ganguly M, Kr Borthakur M, Devi N, Mahanta R. Antifertility activity of the methanolic leaf extract of Cissampelos pareira in female albino mice. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;111:688–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Haider M, Dholakia D, Panwar A, Garg P, Gheware A, Singh D, et al. Transcriptome analysis and connectivity mapping of <em>Cissampelos pareira</em> L. provides molecular links of ESR1 modulation to viral inhibition. bioRxiv. 2021;2021.02.17.431579. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.17.431579.

  11. Kuleshov MV, Jones MR, Rouillard AD, Fernandez NF, Duan Q, Wang Z, et al. Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W90–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Subramanian A, Narayan R, Corsello SM, Peck DD, Natoli TE, Lu X, et al. A next generation connectivity map: L1000 platform and the first 1,000,000 profiles. Cell. 2017;171(6):1437-1452.e17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhatt V, Kumari S, Upadhyay P, Agrawal P, Anmol, Sahal D, et al. Chemical profiling and quantification of potential active constituents responsible for the antiplasmodial activity of Cissampelos pareira. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020;262:113185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Caly L, Druce JD, Catton MG, Jans DA, Wagstaff KM. The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Antiviral Res. 2020;178:104787.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vuong W, Khan MB, Fischer C, Arutyunova E, Lamer T, Shields J, et al. Feline coronavirus drug inhibits the main protease of SARS-CoV-2 and blocks virus replication. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4282.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2010;31:455–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim S, Chen J, Cheng T, Gindulyte A, He J, He S, et al. PubChem in 2021: new data content and improved web interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D1388–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schrödinger, L., & DeLano W. PyMOL. 2020. http://www.pymol.org/pymol.

  19. Bateman A, Martin M-J, Orchard S, Magrane M, Agivetova R, Ahmad S, et al. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;49(D1):D480–9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. SARS-CoV-2 variant classifications and definitions. 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/variant-info.html.

  21. Fiser A, Sali A. Modeller: generation and refinement of homology-based protein structure models. Methods Enzymol. 2003;374:461–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Laskowski RA, Swindells MB. LigPlot+: multiple ligand-protein interaction diagrams for drug discovery. J Chem Inf Model. 2011;51:2778–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dyall J, Coleman CM, Hart BJ, Venkataraman T, Holbrook MR, Kindrachuk J, et al. Repurposing of clinically developed drugs for treatment of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:4885–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Micholas S, Jeremy C. S. Repurposing Therapeutics for COVID-19: Supercomputer-Based Docking to the SARS-CoV-2 Viral Spike Protein and Viral Spike Protein-Human ACE2 Interface. chemRxiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.11871402.v4.

  25. Zhou Y, Hou Y, Shen J, Huang Y, Martin W, Cheng F. Network-based drug repurposing for novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2. Cell Discov. 2020;6:14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41421-020-0153-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang L, Wu Y, Yao S, Ge H, Zhu Y, Chen K, et al. Discovery of potential small molecular SARS-CoV-2 entry blockers targeting the spike protein. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2022;43:788–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Krissinel E, Henrick K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J Mol Biol. 2007;372:774–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sinha M, Gupta A, Gupta S, Singh P, Pandit S, Chauhan SS, et al. Analogue discovery of safer alternatives to HCQ and CQ drugs for SAR-CoV-2 by computational design. Comput Biol Med. 2021;130:104222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kwofie SK, Annan DG, Adinortey CA, Boison D, Kwarko GB, Abban RA, et al. Identification of novel potential inhibitors of varicella-zoster virus thymidine kinase from ethnopharmacologic relevant plants through an in-silico approach. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2021:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2021.1977700.

  30. Hu X, Zhou Z, Li F, Xiao Y, Wang Z, Xu J, et al. The study of antiviral drugs targeting SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike proteins through large-scale compound repurposing. Heliyon. 2021;7:e06387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Xiong Y, Liu Y, Cao L, Wang D, Guo M, Jiang A, et al. Transcriptomic characteristics of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and peripheral blood mononuclear cells in COVID-19 patients. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9:761–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhou Z, Ren L, Zhang L, Zhong J, Xiao Y, Jia Z, et al. Heightened innate immune responses in the respiratory tract of COVID-19 patients. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;27:883-890.e2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jan J-T, Cheng T-JR, Juang Y-P, Ma H-H, Wu Y-T, Yang W-B, et al. Identification of existing pharmaceuticals and herbal medicines as inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2021;118:e2021579118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021579118.

  34. Ye W-Y, Wang J-Z, Deng G-G, Dang Y-W, Liu H-W, Chen G. Estrogenic activities of compound GL-1, isolated from Ganoderma lucidum. Nat Prod Res. 2021;35:6062–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2020.1819270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang S, Xu M, Lee EM, Gorshkov K, Shiryaev SA, He S, et al. Emetine inhibits Zika and Ebola virus infections through two molecular mechanisms: inhibiting viral replication and decreasing viral entry. Cell Discov. 2018;4:31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dong H-J, Wang Z-H, Meng W, Li C-C, Hu Y-X, Zhou L, et al. The natural compound homoharringtonine presents broad antiviral activity in vitro and in vivo. Viruses. 2018;10(11):601.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu K, Zou R, Cui W, Li M, Wang X, Dong J, et al. Clinical HDAC inhibitors are effective drugs to prevent the entry of SARS-CoV2. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2020;3:1361–70. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsptsci.0c00163.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Warowicka A, Nawrot R, Goździcka-Józefiak A. Antiviral activity of berberine. Arch Virol. 2020;165:1935–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Cecil CE, Davis JM, Cech NB, Laster SM. Inhibition of H1N1 influenza A virus growth and induction of inflammatory mediators by the isoquinoline alkaloid berberine and extracts of goldenseal (Hydrastis canadensis). Int Immunopharmacol. 2011;11:1706–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Montanha JA, Amoros M, Boustie J, Girre L. Anti-herpes virus activity of aporphine alkaloids. Planta Med. 1995;61:419–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Boustie J, Stigliani JL, Montanha J, Amoros M, Payard M, Girre L. Antipoliovirus structure-activity relationships of some aporphine alkaloids. J Nat Prod. 1998;61:480–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Mohamed SM, Hassan EM, Ibrahim NA. Cytotoxic and antiviral activities of aporphine alkaloids of Magnolia grandiflora L. Nat Prod Res. 2010;24:1395–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786410902906959.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ptak RG, Gentry BG, Hartman TL, Watson KM, Osterling MC, Buckheit RW, et al. Inhibition of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 by Triciribine Involves the Accessory Protein Nef. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:1512 LP – 1519. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01443-09.

  44. Wang Z, Guo K, Gao P, Pu Q, Wu M, Li C, et al. Identification of Repurposable Drugs and Adverse Drug Reactions for Various Courses of COVID-19 Based on Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data. ArXiv. 2020;:arXiv:2005.07856v2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33299905.

  45. Zheng Y, Li R, Liu S. Immunoregulation with mTOR inhibitors to prevent COVID-19 severity: a novel intervention strategy beyond vaccines and specific antiviral medicines. J Med Virol. 2020;92:1495–500. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Schultze JL, Aschenbrenner AC. COVID-19 and the human innate immune system. Cell. 2021;184:1671–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Notas G, Kampa M, Castanas E. G protein-coupled estrogen receptor in immune cells and its role in immune-related diseases. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:579420. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.579420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Marin R, Diaz M. Estrogen interactions with lipid rafts related to neuroprotection. Impact of brain ageing and menopause. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Seeland U, Coluzzi F, Simmaco M, Mura C, Bourne PE, Heiland M, et al. Evidence for treatment with estradiol for women with SARS-CoV-2 infection. BMC Med. 2020;18:369. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01851-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. La Vignera S, Cannarella R, Condorelli RA, Torre F, Aversa A, Calogero AE. Sex-specific SARS-CoV2 mortality: Among hormone-modulated ace2 expression, risk of venous thromboembolism and hypovitaminosis D. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Rakesh Mishra (director-CCMB) for facilitating and support for SARS-CoV-2 infection model. The authors acknowledge research fellowship support to MH (University Grants Commission), DD (Department of Biotechnology) SK (CSIR) and Anmol (DST-INSPIRE).

Funding

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) TRISUTRA (MLP-901) and Center of Excellence on Applied Developments in Ayurveda, Prakriti and Genomics, grant by Ministry of AYUSH (GAP0183), Govt. of India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Genomics & molecular medicine, CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Delhi, 110007, India

    Madiha Haider, Vivek Anand, Dhwani Dholakia, Bhavana Prasher & Mitali Mukerji

  2. Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201002, India

    Madiha Haider, Vivek Anand, Surekha Kumari,  Anmol, Dhwani Dholakia, Upendra Sharma, Bhavana Prasher & Mitali Mukerji

  3. CSIR-Center for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500007, India

    M. Ghalib Enayathullah, Yash Parekh, Sushma Ram & Kiran Kumar Bokara

  4. Chemical Technology Division, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, 176 061, India

    Surekha Kumari,  Anmol & Upendra Sharma

  5. Department of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Delhi, India

    Gayatri Panda & Arjun Ray

  6. Department of Bioscience & Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, NH 62, Karwar, Rajasthan, 342037, India

    Manjari Shukla, Sudipta Bhattacharyya & Mitali Mukerji

  7. Centre of Excellence for Applied Developments of Ayurveda Prakriti and Genomics, CSIR’s Ayurgenomics Unit TRISUTRA, CSIR-IGIB, New Delhi, 110025, India

    Bhavana Prasher & Mitali Mukerji

Authors
  1. Madiha Haider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vivek Anand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Ghalib Enayathullah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yash Parekh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sushma Ram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Surekha Kumari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Anmol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gayatri Panda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Manjari Shukla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Dhwani Dholakia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Arjun Ray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Sudipta Bhattacharyya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Upendra Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Kiran Kumar Bokara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Bhavana Prasher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Mitali Mukerji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Connectivity experiment and analysis: MH, VA and DD. Integrated analysis, manuscript writing: MH, BP and MM. SARS-CoV-2 inhibition experiments and analysis: MGE, YP, SR and KKB. Medicinal chemistry experiments and analysis: SK, A and US. Molecular docking experiments and analysis: MS, GP, AR and SB. Conceptualisation, supervision: BP and MM. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bhavana Prasher or Mitali Mukerji.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not Applicable.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of statement.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Supplementary methods. Fig. S1. Flow chart of preparation of extracts, and isolation of pure molecules from Cissampelos pareira. Fig S2. Magnoflorine is a plausible SARS-CoV2 3C-like protease inhibitor. The left panel exhibits Magnoflorine binding at evolutionary conserved active site catalytic groove of SARS-CoV2 3C-like protease. The colour coded surface map represents site specific amino acid evolution rate of SARS-CoV2 3C-like protease. The middle panel and the right panel represent the mutually exclusive binding site of Magnoflorine and GC373, a well-established synthetic inhibitor of SARS-CoV2 3C-like protease [Vuong W, Khan MB, Fischer C, Arutyunova E, Lamer T, Shields J, et al. Feline coronavirus drug inhibits the main protease of SARS-CoV-2 and blocks virus replication. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4282]; encircled amino acid residues in the right panel are the common interaction partners for Magnoflorine and GC373. Fig S3. Cipa principle bioactive compounds (Salutaridine, Pareiramine, Magnoflorine, Cissamine) are plausible spike protein targeting cellular entry inhibitor of SARS-CoV2. Docked bioactive compounds and H69D1, an established synthetic SARS-CoV2 entry blocker [Wang L, Wu Y, Yao S, Ge H, Zhu Y, Chen K, et al. Discovery of potential small molecular SARS-CoV-2 entry blockers targeting the spike protein. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2021;:1–9] share the same amino acid binding partners from the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV2 spike protein. Left and middle panels show the interaction of tested Cipa bioactive compounds and H69D1 at the ACE2/RBD interface formed during SARS-CoV2 cellular entry (PDB ID: 6M0J). In the right panel, encircled amino acid residues in the two-dimensional interaction plot are the common interaction partners for the tested Cipa bioactive compounds and H69D1. Fig S4. Cipa bioactive compounds bind spike protein of SARS-CoV2 delta variant at a distal drug binding hotspot. Table S1: 39 genes common between Cipa, BALF-1 and BALF-2.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haider, M., Anand, V., Enayathullah, M.G. et al. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 potential of Cissampelos pareira L. identified by connectivity map-based analysis and in vitro studies. BMC Complement Med Ther 22, 114 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-022-03584-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-022-03584-3

Keywords

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies

ISSN: 2662-7671

Contact us