Skip to main content

Compounds from Olea europaea and Pistacia lentiscus inhibit oral microbial growth



In view of the increasing antibiotic resistance, the introduction of natural anti-infective agents has brought a new era in the treatment of bacterially derived oral diseases.


The aim of this study was to investigate the antimicrobial potential of five natural constituents of Olea europaea (oleuropein, maslinic acid, hydroxytyrosol, oleocanthal, oleacein) and three compounds of Pistacia lentiscus (24Z-isomasticadienolic acid, oleanolic acid, oleanonic aldehyde) against ten representative oral bacterial species and a Candida albicans strain. After the isolation and quality control of natural compounds, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) assay were performed.


Among all O. europaea-derived constituents, maslinic acid was the most active (MIC = 4.9–312 μg mL− 1, MBC = 9.8–25 μg mL− 1) one against oral streptococci and anaerobic pathogenic bacteria (Porphyromonas gingivalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Parvimonas micra), while oleuropein, hydroxytyrosol, oleocanthal and oleacein showed milder, yet significant effects against P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum. Among all P. lentiscus compounds, oleanolic acid was the most effective one against almost all microorganisms with MIC values ranging from 9.8 μg mL− 1 (P. gingivalis) to 625 μg mL− 1 (F. nucleatum, P. micra). In the presence of 24Z-isomasticadienolic acid, a mean inhibitory concentration range of 2.4 μg mL− 1 to 625 μg mL− 1 was observed for strict anaerobia. The MIC value for 24Z-isomasticadienolic acid was estimated between 39 μg mL− 1 (Streptococcus sobrinus, Streptococcus oralis) and 78 μg mL− 1 (Streptococcus mutans). All tested compounds showed no effects against Prevotella intermedia.


Overall, maslinic acid and oleanolic acid exerted the most significant inhibitory activity against the tested oral pathogens, especially streptococci and anaerobic oral microorganisms.

Peer Review reports


The nature-inspired therapies of various bacterially-driven infections based on herbals are one of the most current therapeutic trends in medicine [1]. Nevertheless, more than 300.000 plant extracts need to be screened for their antioxidant and antimicrobial properties [2,3,4]. Among these, a selection of Mediterranean plant extracts from olive (Olea europaea), parsley (Petroselinum crispum), oregano (Origanum vulgare), thyme (Thymus vulgaris), sage (Salvia officinalis), mastic gum (Pistacia lentiscus) and false yellowhead (Inula viscosa) have shown a significant inhibitory activity against numerous bacteria [5,6,7]. However, to elucidate the mechanisms relating to their complex biological behavior, the effect of pure plant-derived compounds on microorganisms has to be investigated [8, 9].

The antimicrobial traits of plants can be attributed to the activity of natural antibiotics with low molecular weight (MW < 500), named phytoalexins, and synergistic action [10, 11]. These well-studied antimicrobial stress-derived metabolites of plant origin include flavonoids, glycosteroids, terpenoids, and polyphenols [12]. Furthermore, other specific defense mechanisms of plants are supported by the release of avirulence (Avr) gene-activated resistance (R) proteins or the secretion of a polysaccharide with (1–3)-ß-D-glucan subunits, namely callose, under the threat of the microbial invaders [13, 14]. Finally, plants produce endogenous antimicrobial peptides with less than 100 amino acid residues, low acquisition of resistance and broad-spectrum antimicrobial features [15].

Surprisingly, trillions of microbes are an integral part of the healthy human body and outnumber host cells by 10 to 1 [16]. Although microbes could benefit humans by carrying 8 million health-related genes, they are also able to turn into pathogenic body inhabitants under specific circumstances [17, 18]. The high pathogenicity of bacteria, viruses, and fungi can be demonstrated through the formation of antibiotic-resistant oral biofilms [19]. The oral cavity is a representative ecological niche with more than 700 microbial residents, often organized in biofilm networks on teeth or gingiva [20]. As a result, biofilm-associated oral diseases such as caries, gingivitis or periodontitis can occur [21].

In recent years the research on the chemotherapeutic intransigence of microbial biofilms, whose antibiotic resistance is 1000 times higher compared to planktonic bacterial cells, has been intensified [22]. In the oral cavity in particular, the antibiotic-resistant Enterococcus faecalis detected in infected root canals expressed the endocarditis-related antigen A (EfaA) [23]. Due to the production of β-lactamases by Prevotella spp., fusobacteria and capnocytophaga, an abundance of blaTEM resistance genes could be identified in subgingival and tongue samples [24]. Therefore, there is an urgent need for novel oral antimicrobials with low risk of provoking bacterial resistance to antibiotic monotherapy [3]. In that context, the scenario of introducing novel phytopharmaceuticals has attracted attention lately [25, 26]. The effectiveness of natural antimicrobial candidates can be attributed to their synergistic impact and broad pharmaceutical spectrum resulting from secondary metabolic reactions [27, 28].

For this purpose, the present report focused on the antimicrobial behavior of natural compounds deriving from Olea europaea L. (Oleaceae) and Pistacia lentiscus L. (Anacardiaceae) against representative oral bacterial species. More specifically, eight different antimicrobial agents from olive leaves, table olive processing wastewater, olive oil and mastic gum were screened against eight representative bacterial inhabitants of the oral cavity, namely Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Streptococcus oralis, Enterococcus faecalis, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Parvimonas micra, Prevotella intermedia, Fusobacterium nucleatum and the yeast Candida albicans. Among these S. mutans and S. sobrinus are related to dental caries [29], E. faecalis correlates with secondary endodontic infections [30], P. gingivalis, P. micra and P. intermedia are periodontal pathogens [31], while C. albicans can cause oral infections in denture wearers [32].Typical representatives of the intestinal and skin flora such as Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, respectively, were used as reference bacteria. In our previous report, an olive extract and total mastic extract from P. lentiscus exhibited significant antimicrobial activity against oral microorganisms [33]. The null hypothesis of this report was that the tested natural compounds from O. europaea and P. lentiscus have no antimicrobial effect on oral microbes. To assess this, two antimicrobial assays - the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assay were applied.


Following our research on the antimicrobial efficacy of Mediterranean natural plant extracts, some of the most promising extracts were selected [33] and their major compounds were tested.

Compounds extraction from O. europaea

Oleuropein and maslinic acid used in this study were isolated from an extract deriving from O. europaea L. (Oleaceae) leaves that were collected in 2009 at the region of Attica and were identified by Dr. E. Kalpoutzakis. A voucher specimen is deposited at the herbarium of the Department of Pharmacognosy and Natural Products Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Athens, Greece under the number PROK 006. The preparation of the extract has been described in a previous report [33]. The extract (360 g) was separated, dried and subjected to medium pressure Liquid Chromatography (MPLC) with silica (Si) gel 60 Merck (15–40 mm), using the dichloromethane (CH2Cl2) / methanol (MeOH) gradient as the eluent to extract pure oleuropein (≥ 95%) and maslinic acid (≥ 95%). Hydroxytyrosol was isolated from an extract produced from table olive processing wastewater. The preparation of the extract and the isolation of pure hydroxytyrosol (≥ 95%) have been previously described [34]. For the procurement of oleacein and oleocanthal the total polyphenol fraction (TPF) of extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) was used as starting material [35], while for their isolation column chromatography (CC) and preparative Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) were employed, as previously described [36]. Briefly, 170 L of EVOO was subjected to 25 kg of the adsorbent XAD-7HP resin. The resin was activated with water (H2O) and ethanol (EtOH), and EVOO remained in the XAD-7HP resin for 2 days with controlled and smoothed shaking and filtered. The resin was washed with 30 L cyclohexane (cHex) for the removal of the lipophilic constituents, and then the polyphenol-enriched extract was obtained by the extraction of the resin with approx. 40 L of ethanol. Further purification was achieved by liquid–liquid extraction using cHex and EtOH, and the obtained ethanolic fraction was filtered through paper and evaporated until dry affording 150 g of TPF. In continuation, 250 mg of TPF were subjected to a Si gel (0.015–0.04 mm) column (25 × 2.7 cm) and mixtures of CH2Cl2 and MeOH in increasing polarity (0–10% MeOH) were used for the elution. From the fractions obtained using 98:2 CH2Cl2 / MeOH, oleocanthal was isolated, while from the fractions obtained using 97:3 CH2Cl2 / MeOH, oleacein was attained. For further purification, preparative TLC was used. Specifically, precoated TLC silica 60 F254 plates, 2 mm layer thickness (purchased from Aldrich), were used while 94:6 CH2Cl2 / MeOH was used as the mobile phase. Spots were visualized using ultraviolet (UV) light and vanillin-sulfuric acid reagent. Finally, oleocanthal (≥ 95%) and oleacein (≥ 95%) were purified.

Compounds extraction from P. lentiscus

24Z-isomasticadienolic acid, oleanolic acid and oleanonic aldehyde were isolated from mastic gum [37]. Commercially available mastic gum was supplied by Chios Mastic Growers Association which is the exclusive worldwide producer of the resin. Conventional extraction of mastic gum for the preparation of total mastic extract without polymer (TMEWP) (extraction A) has been described in a previous report (Karygianni et al., 2014a). TMEWP partitioned between aqueous 5% Na2CO3 and ether as already described (extraction B) [38]. The organic phase was reextracted three times with 5% Na2CO3 (extraction C) and afforded the neutral fraction of mastic (135 g) as the organic phase. The aqueous phase was added to that of extraction B and acidified with 1 N HCl. The acidic solution was reextracted with ether (extraction D), and the organic phase afforded the acid fraction of mastic (190 g).

The acidic fraction (20 g) was submitted to MPLC over normal-phase silica gel first with a cHex / CH2Cl2 gradient and then with a CH2Cl2/MeOH gradient affording 23 fractions. In continuation, oleanolic acid was separated by MPLC over normal-phase silica gel eluted with a CH2Cl2 / MeOH gradient, while 24Z-isomasticadienolic acid by column chromatography over silica gel eluted with a CH2Cl2 / MeOH gradient. A part of the neutral fraction (17.2 g) was submitted to column liquid chromatography over normal-phase silica gel with a cHex / CH2Cl2 gradient to afford 22 fractions. Oleanonic aldehyde was separated in continuation by MPLC over normal-phase silica gel eluted with a cHex / CH2Cl2 gradient.

Chemical analysis of compounds

The chemical structures of the tested compounds are demonstrated on Fig. 1. The identity and purity (≥95%) of the isolated compounds were confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), mass spectrometry (MS) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) experiments and by comparison with literature data. All solvents (ethanol, methanol, dichloromethane and cyclohexane) were of p.A. quality and came from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Water was purified by double distillation.

Fig. 1

Chemical structures of the tested compounds from Olea europaea (oleuropein, maslinic acid, hydroxytyrosol, oleocanthal, oleacein) and Pistacia lentiscus (24Z-isomasticadienolic acid, oleanolic acid, oleanonic aldehyde)

Bacterial strains and Candida albicans

A total of eleven microbial strains from ten different bacterial strains and one Candida albicans strain were tested. Among these eight bacterial strains and C. albicans represent typical oral inhabitants, while the reference bacterial strains Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus are members of the intestinal and skin flora, respectively. Their use facilitated the comparison of the antimicrobial activity of the natural compounds within the oral cavity against their general inhibitory impact. Facultative anaerobic Gram-positive species such as Streptococcus mutans DSM 20523, Streptococcus sobrinus DSM 20381, Streptococcus oralis ATCC 35037, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 and S. aureus ATCC 25923 were tested. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 served also as a facultative anaerobic bacterium but with a Gram-negative cell wall. The tested obligate anaerobes included Porphyromonas gingivalis W381, Prevotella intermedia ATCC 25611, Fusobacterium nucleatum ATCC 25586 and Parvimonas micra ATCC 23195. All bacterial strains and C. albicans were kindly provided by the Division of Infectious Diseases and the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene of the Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg. The microorganisms were kept at − 80 °C in basic growth medium containing 15% (v/v) glycerol prior to use.

Determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)

As described in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines an overnight culture of each bacterial strain and C. albicans was prepared and each dilution was placed on Columbia blood agar plates (CBA, Becton Dickinson GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) or yeast-cysteine blood agar plates (HCB, Becton Dickinson GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) [39, 40]. CBA agar plates were used for the incubation of facultative anaerobic bacteria and C. albicans at 37 °C and 5 -10% CO2 atmosphere for 24 h. HCB agar plates were used for the incubation of anaerobic bacteria at 37 °C for 48 h (anaerobic chamber, Genbox BioMérieux SA, Marcy/Etoile, France). For the microdilution assay at 106 colony forming units (CFU) mL− 1 for each strain, Mueller-Hinton Broth (MHB) was utilized for the inoculation of all facultative anaerobic strains, Wilkins–Chalgren broth (WCB) for anaerobic bacteria and Sabouraud Dextrose Broth (SDB) for C. albicans. Then, with the aid of a multi-channel pipette appropriate volumes of the MHB/WCB/SDB microbial cultures were transferred into a 96-well microtiter-plate. Each well of the 96-well microtiter-plate had a total volume of 200 μL. Afterwards the prepared compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma, Steinheim, Germany) and diluted in distilled water. A concentration series ranging from 2500 μg mL-1 to 2.4 μg mL− 1 at dilution levels starting from 2-fold to 512-fold was used to screen all compound solutions in DMSO. The experiments were conducted in duplicate. For bacteria and fungi, a 0.5/1A McFarland standard suspension was diluted in normal saline. A dilution series of DMSO was tested in parallel in order to exclude potential inhibitory effects of the DMSO residuals. In case of bacterial growth in the co-tested DMSO dilution series the inhibitory impact of DMSO was taken into account. Wells containing only sterile MHB/WCB/SDB to minimize the possibility of contamination or 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) served as positive and negative controls, respectively. Thereafter, facultative anaerobic bacteria and C. albicans were incubated at 37 °C and 5 -10% CO2 atmosphere for 24 h, while anaerobic bacteria were kept at 37 °C for 48 h (anaerobic chamber, Genbox BioMérieux SA, Marcy / Etoile, France). All assays for each bacterial strain and C. albicans were conducted in duplicate. If the MIC values of a specific strain were not identical, the highest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were taken into account. MIC was determined as the lowest concentration of each compound at which visible inhibition of bacterial growth occurred, and was expressed by the percentage of bacterial growth at that particular concentration.

Determination of the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC)

As described in the CLSI guidelines the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) could also be determined [39, 40]. After the MIC testing, 10 μL from each well of the 96-well microtiter-plates containing the tested compound concentration series were incubated on agar plates. In particular, Columbia blood agar (CBA) agar plates were used for facultative anaerobic bacteria and C. albicans at 37 °C and 5 -10% CO2 atmosphere for 2 days. Strictly anaerobic bacteria were incubated on yeast-cysteine blood agar (HCB) plates at 37 °C for 5 days (anaerobic chamber, Genbox BioMérieux SA, Marcy/Etoile, France). The colony forming units (CFU) were determined visually. The MBC was determined as the concentration at which a three-log decrease in bacterial growth (= 99.9%) was detected compared to the positive control. In the presence of variations within the yielded MIC/MBC values after the repetition of the experiments, the highest MIC/MBC values were listed to eliminate false positive results.


O. europaea

Five compounds (oleuropein, maslinic acid, hydroxytyrosol, oleocanthal and, oleacein) isolated from O. europaea by-products (leaves, table olives processing wastewater) and products (olive oil) were screened. Table 1 demonstrates the mean MIC and MBC values for each of the aforementioned O. europaea compounds as well as the tested bacterial and fungal strains.

Table 1 Antimicrobial activity in μg mL-1 of compounds from O. europaea

Overall, maslinic acid was more effective than oleuropein, hydroxytyrosol, oleocanthal and oleacein. Maslinic acid was active against almost all anaerobic bacterial strains, with a mean concentration range of 4.9 μg mL− 1 (Porphyromonas gingivalis) to 312 μg mL− 1 (Fusobacterium nucleatum). The obligate anaerobe Parvimonas micra (9.8 μg mL− 1) were efficiently inhibited, whereas maslinic acid showed no inhibitory effect against Prevotella intermedia. For streptococci (Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Streptococcus oralis) the MIC value for maslinic acid was estimated at 19.5 μg mL− 1, for Enterococcus faecalis at 39 μg mL− 1, for Staphylococcous aureus at 78 μg mL− 1. The highest MIC value at 1.25 mg mL− 1 was detected for Escherichia coli and Candida albicans. For obligate anaerobes, maslinic acid showed low MBC values, which ranged from 9.8 μg mL− 1 (P gingivalis, P. micra) to 25 μg mL− 1 (F. nucleatum). Streptococci such as S. sobrinus and S. oralis (19.5 μg mL− 1) as well as S. mutans (156 μg mL− 1) were more easily eradicated when compared to facultative anaerobic E. faecalis (312 μg mL− 1) and S. aureus (625 μg mL− 1). The highest MBC value at 1.25 mg mL− 1 was detected for E. coli and C. albicans, while P. intermedia was not affected at all by maslinic acid.

Oleacein exhibited a milder inhibitory activity against oral microorganisms. The lowest MIC values of oleacein were observed for obligate anaerobes and were between 156 μg mL− 1 (F. nucleatum) and 1.25 mg mL− 1 (P. micra). The anaerobic P. gingivalis showed also a satisfactory MIC value of 312 μg mL− 1 and P. intermedia could be inhibited only by oleacein (625 μg mL− 1) after 5 days of culture. All other bacterial strains (streptococci, E. faecalis, E. coli) and C. albicans had MIC and MBC values of 1.25 mg mL− 1. The MBC values of oleacein for obligate anaerobia were substantially lower ranging from 156 μg mL− 1 (F. nucleatum), 625 μg mL− 1 (P. gingivalis) to 1.25 mg mL− 1 (P. micra).

Oleocanthal also showed an inhibitory effect on oral bacteria. The lowest MIC values of oleocanthal were detected for S. sobrinus (312 μg mL− 1) as well as obligate anaerobes and varied between 156 μg mL− 1 (P. gingivalis) and 312 μg mL− 1 (F. nucleatum, P. micra). C. albicans was eradicated at 625 μg mL− 1, whereas the streptococci and reference strains had MIC and MBC values of 1.25 mg mL− 1. Obligate anaerobes (P. gingivalis, F. nucleatum, P. micra) showed the lowest MBC value (312 μg mL− 1), while P. intermedia did not respond to the treatment with oleocanthal.

Concerning hydroxytyrosol, the lowest compound concentrations of 156 μg mL− 1 (P. gingivalis), 312 μg mL− 1 after 5 days of culture (P. intermedia, F. nucleatum) exerted bactericidal effect mainly on strict anaerobic, Gram-negative bacteria. From the streptococci, S. mutans and S. sobrinus presented also satisfactory inhibitory values of 312 μg mL− 1 and 625 μg mL− 1, respectively. The highest MIC value of hydroxytyrosol (1.25 mg mL− 1) was observed for the reference strains, C. albicans. E. faecalis and P. micra. The lowest MBC value of hydroxytyrosol was estimated at 312 μg mL− 1 (P. gingivalis, F. nucleatum, S. mutans), while 99.9% of E. faecalis, S. aureus and C. albicans were eradicated by 2.5 mg mL− 1 of hydroxytyrosol.

Finally, oleuropein had the mildest antimicrobial impact on the oral pathogens. The MIC and MBC values of the eradicated microbial strains for oleuropein were between 625 μg mL− 1 (S. mutans, S. aureus, P. gingivalis) to 1.25 mg mL− 1 (S. oralis. E. faecalis, E. coli, P. micra, C. albicans). The lowest MBC value of oleuropein (312 μg mL− 1) was observed for F. nucleatum, whereas P. intermedia was not inhibited by this compound.

P. lentiscus

Table 2 summarizes the MIC and MBC values of the three compounds (24Z-isomasticadienolic acid, oleanolic acid, and oleanonic aldehyde) isolated from P. lentiscus for all screened microbial strains.

Table 2 Antimicrobial activity in μg mL-1 of compounds from P. lentiscus

Among all mastic gum compounds, oleanolic acid was the most effective against almost all microorganisms with MIC values ranging from 9.8 μg mL− 1 (P. gingivalis) to 625 μg mL− 1 (F. nucleatum, P. micra) for obligate anaerobes. The MIC value for maslinic acid was estimated at 19.5 μg mL− 1 for streptococci (S. mutans, S. sobrinus, S. oralis), at 78 μg mL− 1 for E. faecalis and S. aureus. The highest MIC and MBC value of oleanolic acid (1.25 mg mL− 1) was detected for E. coli and C. albicans, whereas P. intermedia was not affected at all by oleanolic acid. The mean MBC values for strict anaerobic bacteria were 9.8 μg mL− 1 (P. gingivalis), 625 μg mL− 1 (F. nucleatum) and 1.25 mg mL− 1 (P. micra), whereas higher MBC values were estimated for streptococci at 39 μg mL− 1 (S. mutans, S. sobrinus) and 78 μg mL− 1 (S. oralis).

Another compound, the 24Z-isomasticadienolic acid also presented a substantial antimicrobial effect against the screened microorganisms. In its presence, a mean inhibitory concentration range of 2.4 μg mL− 1 (P. gingivalis, P. micra) to 625 μg mL− 1 (F. nucleatum) was observed for strict anaerobia. The MIC value for 24Z-isomasticadienolic acid was estimated between 39 μg mL− 1 (S. sobrinus, S. oralis) and 78 μg mL− 1 (S. mutans) for streptococci, while E. faecalis had a MIC value of 156 μg mL− 1. The highest MIC and MBC value of 24Z-isomasticadienolic acid (1.25 mg mL− 1) was detected for E. coli, S. aureus and C. albicans, whereas P. intermedia did not respond to the treatment. The lowest MBC value (9.8 μg mL− 1) were determined for the obligate anaerobia P. gingivalis and P. micra, while 78 μg mL− 1 and 156 μg mL− 1 of the compound killed 99.9% of S. oralis and P. micra and S. mutans, respectively.

Oleanonic aldehyde presented the lowest antimicrobial activity compared to the other two mastic gum compounds. The lowest MIC value of 625 μg mL− 1 was found for P. gingivalis, whereas all other tested bacterial and fungal strains presented MIC and MBC value of 1.25 mg mL− 1. Oleanonic aldehyde proved to be ineffective against P. intermedia.


The present report introduced and screened eight antimicrobial compounds originating from O. europaea and P. lentiscus against nine representative oral pathogens. The efficacy of three different extracts from the aforementioned plants against oral microorganisms was highlighted in a previous own study [33]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on the inhibition of oral microbial growth induced by the antimicrobial agents of O. europaea and P. lentiscus.

In this study, maslinic acid isolated from leaves of O. europaea proved to be highly effective, even in very low concentrations in the range of 9.8–25 μg mL− 1, against oral streptococci and anaerobic pathogenic bacteria such as Porphyromonas gingivalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Parvimonas micra. These results confirm the findings of a previous report, which also provided evidence of the high antimicrobial potential of maslinic acid (MIC = 15–30 μg mL− 1; MBC = 25–50 μg mL− 1) against S. aureus, E. coli, E. faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [41]. Maslinic acid belongs to natural pentacyclic triterpenoids, which are able to damage the cell envelope of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [42]. Furthermore, carbon-associated R stereochemistry within this organic compound and the production of synthetic maslinic acid derivatives with the presence of sulfur and chlorine atoms and extra hydroxyl group seem to enhance its antimicrobial capacity [41]. In another report, maslinic acid demonstrated improved antibacterial effects (0.9 μg mL− 1) compared to the antibiotic kanamycin (0.9 μg mL− 1) toward the Gram-positive Bacillus thuringiensis and a substantial inhibitory activity against the Gram-negative E. coli, Salmonella enterica and Shigella dysenteria [43]. Nevertheless, maslinic acid failed to eradicate Gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli, P. aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae in an earlier study [44]. In addition to its inhibitory effect, maslinic acid has proven antioxidant, antitumor and antidiabetogenic activity [45].

The other three compounds isolated from O. europaea, namely oleuropein, oleocanthal, hydroxytyrosol and oleacein presented more moderate inhibitory effects compared to maslinic acid against the Gram-negative anaerobic P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum. Oleuropein is a oleosidic ester of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol [46] isolated from olive leaves. Indeed, there are many reports on the high-level antibacterial activity of oleuropein using various microorganisms [47,48,49]. Recently, Bisignano et al. highlighted also the antibacterial action of an oleuropein derivative, namely 3,4-DHPEA-EA, against Gram-positive ATCC strains, food and clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis and S. aureus [50]. One possible mechanism of action involves the prevention of the activity repression of lactoperoxidase mediated by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). As a result, the increased release of its oxidation product named hypothiocyanite (OSCN), which can penetrate microbial biofilms, leads to enhanced bacteriostatic features [51, 52]. Interestingly, to strengthen its antibacterial behavior lactic acid bacteria such as Lactobacillus plantarum are able to hydrolyze and subsequently convert oleuropein into hydroxytyrosol [53]. The phenolic compound hydroxytyrosol was most effective against Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria. This fact is of high importance in oral infections, since Gram negative bacteria such as P. gingivalis are associated with periodontal disease while Gram positive microorganisms correlate with periodontal health [54]. In a previous study, 4-hydroxytyrosol also exerted bactericidal activity against the Gram-positive S. aureus as well as the virulent staphylococcal enterotoxin A [55]. The antibacterial behavior of hydroxytyrosol (400 μg mL− 1) and the combination hydroxytyrosol/gallic acid against E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes and S. aureus was confirmed in another recent report [56].

Oleocanthal and oleacein constitute two aldehydic compounds of olive oil with great structural similarity [57]. To date, both substances have proven to be natural non-steroidal, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory compounds [58, 59]. Scotece et al. elucidated the active anti-inflammatory role of oleocanthal [60]. In particular, oleocanthal interferes with the activity of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated macrophages and chondrocytes hindering nitric oxide (NO), interleukin (IL-6, IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) production [60]. Oleacein was documented to protect the cardiovascular system by decreasing the progression of atherosclerosis and repairing angiotensin II-affected endothelial progenitor cells [59, 61]. With regard to its antibacterial traits, the present study is the first report on the moderate, yet effective inhibitory activity of oleocanthal and oleacein, especially against anaerobic oral pathogens. However, oleanonic aldehyde as well as the other tested extracts proved to be ineffective against the anerobic P. intermedia.

Among all tested triterpenoid acids, oleanolic acid was the most active natural pentacyclic triterpenoid (MIC, MBC = 9.8 μg mL− 1-1.25 mg/mL− 1) of P. lentiscus. The tree provides a resinous exudate named mastic gum [62]. With reference to the biological behavior of oleanolic acid, it seems to beneficially modulate the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) which are activated in several diseases e.g. diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and metabolic syndrome [63]. In a recent microbiological study, oleanolic acid synergized with the ß-lactam antibiotics ampicillin and oxacillin against the Gram-positive S. aureus, S. epidermidis and Listeria monocytogenes [42]. This can be attributed to the inhibition of the release of ß-lactamase, allowing for the easier eradication of methicillin-resistant S. aureus by ß-lactams [64]. Nevertheless, Shin et al. showed that oleanolic acid can act solely in synergy with aminoglycoside antibiotics such as kanamycin and cannot enhance the effectiveness of other antimicrobial agents e.g. tetracycline, norfloxacin and rifampicin against Acinetobacter baumannii. In that case the possible mechanism of action involves alteration in energy metabolism pathways and cell membrane susceptibility [65]. Another report underlined the superior inhibitory effects of oleanolic acid (MIC = 30 μg mL− 1-80 μg mL− 1 compared to several triterpene acids against oral streptococci and E. faecalis [66]. Interestingly, it seems that the interference of oleanolic acid with cell envelope, the structure and location of the acyl group on ring A results in a wide-spectrum antimicrobial action against Gram-positive and Gram-negative microorganisms [41, 42]. This was also confirmed in an earlier report on a novel pentacyclic triterpene, namely 3-oxo-olean-12(13),18(19)-dien-29α-carboxylic acid [67].

The natural tetracyclic triterpenoid 24Z-isomasticadienolic acid showed an enhanced inhibitory activity compared to oleanonic aldehyde against Gram-positive and Gram-positive anaerobic oral pathogens as well as streptococci. 24Z-isomasticadienolic acid has proven to possess anti-inflammatory traits against acute and chronic infections. In particular, 24Z-isomasticadienolic acid completely abolished the release of leukotriene B4 (LTB4) from polymorphonuclear leukocytes [68]. 24Z-isomasticadienolic (MBC = 0.2 mg/ml) and it exerted significant antibacterial effects against Helicobacter pylori strains (MBC = 0.35 mg/ml) [37]. Since there are no available data on the antimicrobial properties of oleanonic aldehyde, a pentacyclic triterpene, the current study contains the first promising results against oral bacteria.


In conclusion, the present study highlighted the high-level antimicrobial efficacy of eight different constituents of O. europaea and P. lentiscus against a panel of nine different oral microorganisms. Overall, compounds from O. europaea and P. lentiscus such as maslinic acid and oleanolic acid were extremely effective against the tested oral pathogens, especially streptococci and anaerobic oral microorganisms. All tested extracts proved to be ineffective against the anerobic P. intermedia. Thus, future clinical studies should investigate the use of these natural antimicrobial agents in the treatment of caries- and periodontitis-related oral biofilms.





Columbia blood agar plates


Column chromatography


Colony forming units

CH2Cl2 :







Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute


Dimethyl sulfoxide

EfaA :

Endocarditis-related antigen A




Extra virgin olive oil




Yeast-cysteine blood agar plates


High performance liquid chromatography




Minimum bactericidal concentration




Mueller-Hinton Broth


Minimum inhibitory concentration


Medium pressure liquid chromatography


Mass spectrometry


Molecular weight


Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy


Nitric oxide




Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors


Sabouraud Dextrose Broth




Thin layer chromatography


Total mastic extract without polymer


Tumor necrosis factor α




Wilkins–Chalgren broth


  1. 1.

    Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural products as sources of new drugs from 1981 to 2014. J Nat Prod. 2016;79(3):629–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sofrata A, Santangelo EM, Azeem M, Borg-Karlson AK, Gustafsson A, Putsep K. Benzyl isothiocyanate, a major component from the roots of Salvadora persica is highly active against gram-negative bacteria. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23045.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ngo LT, Okogun JI, Folk WR. 21st century natural product research and drug development and traditional medicines. Nat Prod Rep. 2013;30(4):584–92.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Takebe Y, Saucedo CJ, Lund G, Uenishi R, Hase S, Tsuchiura T, Kneteman N, Ramessar K, Tyrrell DL, Shirakura M, et al. Antiviral lectins from red and blue-green algae show potent in vitro and in vivo activity against hepatitis C virus. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64449.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Wahba NM, Ahmed AS, Ebraheim ZZ. Antimicrobial effects of pepper, parsley, and dill and their roles in the microbiological quality enhancement of traditional Egyptian Kareish cheese. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2010;7(4):411–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Petrolini FV, Lucarini R, de Souza MG, Pires RH, Cunha WR, Martins CH. Evaluation of the antibacterial potential of Petroselinum crispum and Rosmarinus officinalis against bacteria that cause urinary tract infections. Braz J Microbiol. 2013;44(3):829–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Fournomiti M, Kimbaris A, Mantzourani I, Plessas S, Theodoridou I, Papaemmanouil V, Kapsiotis I, Panopoulou M, Stavropoulou E, Bezirtzoglou EE, et al. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils of cultivated oregano (Origanum vulgare), sage (Salvia officinalis), and thyme (Thymus vulgaris) against clinical isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella oxytoca, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2015;26:23289.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Alvin A, Miller KI, Neilan BA. Exploring the potential of endophytes from medicinal plants as sources of antimycobacterial compounds. Microbiol Res. 2014;169(7–8):483–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Tiwari V, Roy R, Tiwari M. Antimicrobial active herbal compounds against Acinetobacter baumannii and other pathogens. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:618.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gonzalez-Lamothe R, Mitchell G, Gattuso M, Diarra MS, Malouin F, Bouarab K. Plant antimicrobial agents and their effects on plant and human pathogens. Int J Mol Sci. 2009;10(8):3400–19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ng TB, Ye XJ, Wong JH, Fang EF, Chan YS, Pan W, Ye XY, Sze SC, Zhang KY, Liu F, et al. Glyceollin, a soybean phytoalexin with medicinal properties. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;90(1):59–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ahuja I, Kissen R, Bones AM. Phytoalexins in defense against pathogens. Trends Plant Sci. 2012;17(2):73–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Dangl JL, Jones JD. Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature. 2001;411(6839):826–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Maor R, Shirasu K. The arms race continues: battle strategies between plants and fungal pathogens. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005;8(4):399–404.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Abedinzadeh M, Gaeini M, Sardari S. Natural antimicrobial peptides against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70(5):1285–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hoffmann AR, Proctor LM, Surette MG, Suchodolski JS. The microbiome: the trillions of microorganisms that maintain health and cause disease in humans and companion animals. Vet Pathol. 2015;53(1):10–21.

  17. 17.

    Blekhman R, Goodrich JK, Huang K, Sun Q, Bukowski R, Bell JT, Spector TD, Keinan A, Ley RE, Gevers D, et al. Host genetic variation impacts microbiome composition across human body sites. Genome Biol. 2015;16:191.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ding T, Schloss PD. Dynamics and associations of microbial community types across the human body. Nature. 2014;509(7500):357–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Battin TJ, Sloan WT, Kjelleberg S, Daims H, Head IM, Curtis TP, Eberl L. Microbial landscapes: new paths to biofilm research. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5(1):76–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Filoche S, Wong L, Sissons CH. Oral biofilms: emerging concepts in microbial ecology. J Dent Res. 2010;89(1):8–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Beikler T, Flemmig TF. Oral biofilm-associated diseases: trends and implications for quality of life, systemic health and expenditures. Periodontol 2000. 2011;55(1):87–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Karygianni L, Ruf S, Follo M, Hellwig E, Bucher M, Anderson AC, Vach K, Al-Ahmad A. Novel broad-Spectrum antimicrobial Photoinactivation of in situ Oral biofilms by visible light plus water-filtered infrared a. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80(23):7324–36.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Al-Ahmad A, Ameen H, Pelz K, Karygianni L, Wittmer A, Anderson AC, Spitzmuller B, Hellwig E. Antibiotic resistance and capacity for biofilm formation of different bacteria isolated from endodontic infections associated with root-filled teeth. J Endod. 2014;40(2):223–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ioannidis I, Sakellari D, Spala A, Arsenakis M, Konstantinidis A. Prevalence of tetM, tetQ, nim and Bla(TEM) genes in the oral cavities of Greek subjects: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(7):569–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Jeon JG, Rosalen PL, Falsetta ML, Koo H. Natural products in caries research: current (limited) knowledge, challenges and future perspective. Caries Res. 2011;45(3):243–63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chandra Shekar BR, Nagarajappa R, Suma S, Thakur R. Herbal extracts in oral health care - a review of the current scenario and its future needs. Pharmacogn Rev. 2015;9(18):87–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Radulovic NS, Blagojevic PD, Stojanovic-Radic ZZ, Stojanovic NM. Antimicrobial plant metabolites: structural diversity and mechanism of action. Curr Med Chem. 2013;20(7):932–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Yang C, Chowdhury MA, Huo Y, Gong J. Phytogenic compounds as alternatives to in-feed antibiotics: potentials and challenges in application. Pathogens. 2015;4(1):137–56.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gross EL, Beall CJ, Kutsch SR, Firestone ND, Leys EJ, Griffen AL. Beyond Streptococcus mutans: dental caries onset linked to multiple species by 16S rRNA community analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47722.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Tennert C, Fuhrmann M, Wittmer A, Karygianni L, Altenburger MJ, Pelz K, Hellwig E, Al-Ahmad A. New bacterial composition in primary and persistent/secondary endodontic infections with respect to clinical and radiographic findings. J Endod. 2014;40(5):670–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Brito F, Zaltman C, Carvalho AT, Fischer RG, Persson R, Gustafsson A, Figueredo CM. Subgingival microflora in inflammatory bowel disease patients with untreated periodontitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;25(2):239–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gasparoto TH, Dionisio TJ, de Oliveira CE, Porto VC, Gelani V, Santos CF, Campanelli AP, Lara VS. Isolation of Candida dubliniensis from denture wearers. J Med Microbiol. 2009;58(Pt 7):959–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Karygianni L, Cecere M, Skaltsounis AL, Argyropoulou A, Hellwig E, Aligiannis N, Wittmer A. High-level antimicrobial efficacy of representative Mediterranean natural plant extracts against oral microorganisms. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:839019.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Xynos N, Abatis D, Argyropoulou A, Polychronopoulos P, Aligiannis N, Skaltsounis AL. Development of a sustainable procedure for the recovery of Hydroxytyrosol from table olive processing wastewater using adsorption resin technology and centrifugal partition chromatography. Planta Med. 2015;81(17):1621–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Keiler AM, Zierau O, Bernhardt R, Scharnweber D, Lemonakis N, Termetzi A, Skaltsounis L, Vollmer G, Halabalaki M. Impact of a functionalized olive oil extract on the uterus and the bone in a model of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Eur J Nutr. 2014;53(4):1073–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Vulcano I, Halabalaki M, Skaltsounis L, Ganzera M. Quantitative analysis of pungent and anti-inflammatory phenolic compounds in olive oil by capillary electrophoresis. Food Chem. 2015;169:381–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Paraschos S, Magiatis P, Mitakou S, Petraki K, Kalliaropoulos A, Maragkoudakis P, Mentis A, Sgouras D, Skaltsounis AL. In vitro and in vivo activities of Chios mastic gum extracts and constituents against helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(2):551–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Barton DHR, Seoane E. Triterpenoids. Part XXII. The constitution and stereochemistry of masticadienonic acid. J Chem Soc. 1956;189:4150–7.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    NCCLS, National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards vol. vol. Wayne, PA, USA; 1999.

  40. 40.

    NCCLS, National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards vol. Approved Standard M7–A6, 6th edition edn. edn. Villanova, PA, USA; 2003.

  41. 41.

    Chouaib K, Hichri F, Nguir A, Daami-Remadi M, Elie N, Touboul D, Ben Jannet H, Hamza MA. Semi-synthesis of new antimicrobial esters from the natural oleanolic and maslinic acids. Food Chem. 2015;183:8–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kurek A, Nadkowska P, Pliszka S, Wolska KI. Modulation of antibiotic resistance in bacterial pathogens by oleanolic acid and ursolic acid. Phytomedicine. 2012;19(6):515–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Wang J, Ren H, Xu QL, Zhou ZY, Wu P, Wei XY, Cao Y, Chen XX, Tan JW. Antibacterial oleanane-type triterpenoids from pericarps of Akebia trifoliata. Food Chem. 2015;168:623–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Braca A, Morelli I, Mendez J, Battinelli L, Braghiroli L, Mazzanti G. Antimicrobial triterpenoids from Licania heteromorpha. Planta Med. 2000;66(8):768–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Rufino-Palomares EE, Reyes-Zurita FJ, Garcia-Salguero L, Mokhtari K, Medina PP, Lupianez JA, Peragon J. Maslinic acid, a triterpenic anti-tumoural agent, interferes with cytoskeleton protein expression in HT29 human colon-cancer cells. J Proteome. 2013;83:15–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Barbaro B, Toietta G, Maggio R, Arciello M, Tarocchi M, Galli A, Balsano C. Effects of the olive-derived polyphenol oleuropein on human health. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(10):18508–24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Lee OH, Lee BY. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of individual and combined phenolics in Olea europaea leaf extract. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(10):3751–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Saavedra MJ, Borges A, Dias C, Aires A, Bennett RN, Rosa ES, Simoes M. Antimicrobial activity of phenolics and glucosinolate hydrolysis products and their synergy with streptomycin against pathogenic bacteria. Med Chem. 2010;6(3):174–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Waterman E, Lockwood B. Active components and clinical applications of olive oil. Altern Med Rev. 2007;12(4):331–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Bisignano C, Filocamo A, Ginestra G, Giofre SV, Navarra M, Romeo R, Mandalari G. 3,4-DHPEA-EA from Olea europaea L. is effective against standard and clinical isolates of Staphylococcus sp. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2014;13:24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Flemmig J, Rusch D, Czerwinska ME, Rauwald HW, Arnhold J. Components of a standardised olive leaf dry extract (Ph. Eur.) promote hypothiocyanite production by lactoperoxidase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2014;549:17–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Chandler JD, Day BJ. Thiocyanate: a potentially useful therapeutic agent with host defense and antioxidant properties. Biochem Pharmacol. 2012;84(11):1381–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Santos MM, Piccirillo C, Castro PM, Kalogerakis N, Pintado ME. Bioconversion of oleuropein to hydroxytyrosol by lactic acid bacteria. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;28(6):2435–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Dabdoub SM, Tsigarida AA, Kumar PS. Patient-specific analysis of periodontal and peri-implant microbiomes. J Dent Res. 2013;92(12 Suppl):168s–75s.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Friedman M, Rasooly R, Do PM, Henika PR. The olive compound 4-hydroxytyrosol inactivates Staphylococcus aureus bacteria and staphylococcal enterotoxin a (SEA). J Food Sci. 2011;76(8):M558–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Tafesh A, Najami N, Jadoun J, Halahlih F, Riepl H, Azaizeh H. Synergistic antibacterial effects of polyphenolic compounds from olive mill wastewater. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:431021.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Vougogiannopoulou K, Lemus C, Halabalaki M, Pergola C, Werz O, Smith AB 3rd, Michel S, Skaltsounis L, Deguin B. One-step semisynthesis of oleacein and the determination as a 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor. J Nat Prod. 2014;77(3):441–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Smith AB 3rd, Han Q, Breslin PA, Beauchamp GK. Synthesis and assignment of absolute configuration of (−)-oleocanthal: a potent, naturally occurring non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant agent derived from extra virgin olive oils. Org Lett. 2005;7(22):5075–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Naruszewicz M, Czerwinska ME, Kiss AK. Oleacein. Translation from Mediterranean diet to potential antiatherosclerotic drug. Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21(9):1205–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Scotece M, Gomez R, Conde J, Lopez V, Gomez-Reino JJ, Lago F, Smith AB 3rd, Gualillo O. Further evidence for the anti-inflammatory activity of oleocanthal: inhibition of MIP-1alpha and IL-6 in J774 macrophages and in ATDC5 chondrocytes. Life Sci. 2012;91(23–24):1229–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Parzonko A, Czerwinska ME, Kiss AK, Naruszewicz M. Oleuropein and oleacein may restore biological functions of endothelial progenitor cells impaired by angiotensin II via activation of Nrf2/heme oxygenase-1 pathway. Phytomedicine. 2013;20(12):1088–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Modugno F, Ribechini E, Colombini MP. Chemical study of triterpenoid resinous materials in archaeological findings by means of direct exposure electron ionisation mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2006;20(11):1787–800.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Georgiadis I, Karatzas T, Korou LM, Katsilambros N, Perrea D. Beneficial health effects of Chios gum mastic and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: indications of common mechanisms. J Med Food. 2015;18(1):1–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Kuroda M, Nagasaki S, Ohta T. Sesquiterpene farnesol inhibits recycling of the C55 lipid carrier of the murein monomer precursor contributing to increased susceptibility to beta-lactams in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;59(3):425–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Shin B, Park W. Synergistic effect of Oleanolic acid on aminoglycoside antibiotics against Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0137751.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Scalon Cunha LC, Andrade e Silva ML, Cardoso Furtado NA, Vinholis AH, Gomes Martins CH, da Silva Filho AA, Cunha WR. Antibacterial activity of triterpene acids and semi-synthetic derivatives against oral pathogens. Z Naturforsch C. 2007;62(9–10):668–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Brahmachari G, Mandal NC, Roy R, Ghosh R, Barman S, Sarkar S, Jash SK, Mondal S. A new pentacyclic triterpene with potent antibacterial activity from Limnophila indica Linn. (Druce). Fitoterapia. 2013;90:104–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Giner-Larza EM, Manez S, Giner RM, Recio MC, Prieto JM, Cerda-Nicolas M, Rios JL. Anti-inflammatory triterpenes from Pistacia terebinthus galls. Planta Med. 2002;68(4):311–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This study was supported in part by the German Research Foundation (DFG, AL 1179/2–1). This funding body was not involved in the design of the study or collection, analysis, or interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information




LK, AAA conceived the idea for this report; LK and AA were involved in the data analysis, wrote and critically reviewed the manuscript; MC, AW participated in the study design and conducted the assays; EH, AS and JT read and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lamprini Karygianni.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karygianni, L., Cecere, M., Argyropoulou, A. et al. Compounds from Olea europaea and Pistacia lentiscus inhibit oral microbial growth. BMC Complement Altern Med 19, 51 (2019).

Download citation


  • Natural compounds
  • Olea europaea
  • Pistacia lentiscus
  • Oral microorganisms
  • Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
  • Minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC)