Skip to main content

Antibiotic-potentiation activities of four Cameroonian dietary plants against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria expressing efflux pumps



The continuous spread of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, partially due to efflux pumps drastically reduced the efficacy of the antibiotic armory, increasing the frequency of therapeutic failure. The search for new compounds to potentiate the efficacy of commonly used antibiotics is therefore important. The present study was designed to evaluate the ability of the methanol extracts of four Cameroonian dietary plants (Capsicum frutescens L. var. facilulatum, Brassica oleacera L. var. italica, Brassica oleacera L. var. butyris and Basilicum polystachyon (L.) Moench.) to improve the activity of commonly used antibiotics against MDR Gram-negative bacteria expressing active efflux pumps.


The qualitative phytochemical screening of the plant extracts was performed using standard methods whilst the antibacterial activity was performed by broth micro-dilution method.


All the studied plant extracts revealed the presence of alkaloids, phenols, flavonoids, triterpenes and sterols. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of the studied extracts ranged from 256-1024 μg/mL. Capsicum frutescens var. facilulatum extract displayed the largest spectrum of activity (73%) against the tested bacterial strains whilst the lower MIC value (256 μg/mL) was recorded with Basilicum polystachyon against E. aerogenes ATCC 13048 and P. stuartii ATCC 29916. In the presence of PAβN, the spectrum of activity of Brassica oleacera var. italica extract against bacteria strains increased (75%). The extracts from Brassica oleacera var. butyris, Brassica oleacera var. italica, Capsicum frutescens var. facilulatum and Basilicum polystachyon showed synergistic effects (FIC ≤ 0.5) against the studied bacteria, with an average of 75.3% of the tested antibiotics.


These results provide promising information for the potential use of the tested plants alone or in combination with some commonly used antibiotics in the fight against MDR Gram-negative bacteria.

Peer Review reports


The spread of multidrug-resistant bacteria, partially due to the inappropriate use of common antibiotics, drastically reduced the efficacy of the antibiotic armory, increasing the frequency of therapeutic failure. The over-expression of efflux pumps is the main resistance mechanism observed in many bacteria [1]. In Gram-negative bacteria, many of these efflux pumps belong to the resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND), family of tripartite efflux pumps [2]. In the fight against microbial infections including those due to MDR bacteria, investigations are being carried out to discover new effective, none or less-toxic and available antibacterial drugs. Many scientist are also investigating synergistic compounds to potentiate the activity of the commonly used antibiotics [3]. The present work was designed to evaluate the in vitro ability of some edible plants namely Capsicum frutescens L. var. facilulatum (Solanaceae) or ‘chili pepper’, Brassica oleacera L. var. italica commonly known as ‘Broccoli’ and Brassica oleacera L. var. butyris (Brassicaceae) or ‘Cauliflower’; and Basilicum polystachyon (L.) Moench. (Lamiaceae) or ‘Musk Basil’ to potentiate the effect of common antibiotics against Gram-negative MDR phenotypes.


Plant material and extraction

The plants used in this study were collected in Douala (Littoral Region of Cameroon) in January 2013. The plants were further identified at the National Herbarium (Yaoundé, Cameroon) where voucher specimens were deposited under a reference number (Table 1). Air dried and powdered sample (0.1 g) of each plant was extracted by maceration with methanol (0.3 L) for 48 h at room temperature (25°C). After filtration using Whatman No. 1 filter paper, the filtrate of each plant was concentrated under reduced pressure in a rotary evaporator, and dried at room temperature to give the crude extract. The extraction yield was calculated (Table 2). These extracts were then stored at 4°C until further use.

Table 1 Information on plants used in this study
Table 2 Extraction yields and phytochemical composition of the studied plants

Preliminary phytochemical screenings

The secondary metabolite classes such as alkaloids, anthocyanins, anthraquinones, flavonoids, phenols, saponins, tannins, sterols and triterpenes were screened according to the standard phytochemical methods described by Harbone [16].

Bacteria strains and culture media

The studied microorganisms included both reference (from the American Type Culture Collection, ATCC) and clinical (Laboratory collection) strains of Escherichia coli, Enterobacter aerogenes, Providencia stuartii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae (Table 3). They were maintained at 4°C and sub-cultured on a fresh appropriate Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA) for 24 h before any antibacterial test. The Mueller Hinton Broth (MHB) was used for all antibacterial assays.

Table 3 Bacterial strains and features

Chemicals for antibacterial assays

Nine commonly used antibiotics including tetracycline (TET), cefepime (CEP), streptomycin (STR), ciprofloxacin (CIP), norfloxacin (NOR), chloramphenicol (CHL), ampicillin (AMP), erythromycin (ERY), kanamycin (KAN) (Sigma-Aldrich, St Quentin Fallavier, France) were used for potentiation assay. p- Iodonitrotetrazolium chloride 0.2% (INT) and phenylalanine arginine β-naphthylamide (PAβN) (Sigma-Aldrich) were used as bacterial growth indicator and efflux pumps inhibitor respectively. Dimethylsulfoxide 10% (DMSO) was used as solvent for all extracts.

Bacterial susceptibility determinations

The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of the plant extracts against the studied bacteria were determined by rapid INT colorimetric assay [19, 20]. Briefly, the test samples were first dissolved in DMSO/MHB. The solution obtained was then added to MHB in a 96-well microplate followed by a two fold serial dilution. One hundred microliters (100 μL) of inoculum (1.5 × 106 CFU/mL) prepared in MHB was then added. The plates were covered with a sterile plate sealer, then agitated to mix the contents of the wells using a shaker and incubated at 37°C for 18 h. The final concentration ranges were 8-1024 μg/mL for plant extracts and 2-512 μg/mL for reference antibiotic chloramphenicol (CHL). Wells containing MHB (100 μL), 100 μL of inoculum and DMSO at a final concentration of 2.5% served as negative growth inhibition control. MIC was detected after 18 h of incubation at 37°C, following addition (40 μL) of 0.2 mg/mL INT and incubation at 37°C for 30 min. Viable bacteria reduced the yellow dye to pink. MIC was defined as the lowest sample concentration that prevented this change and exhibited complete inhibition of bacterial growth [21]. The minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBC) of the samples was determined by taking 50 μL of the suspensions from the wells which did not show any growth after incubation during MIC assays to a new 96-well microplate containing 150 μL of fresh broth per well. The plate was further re-incubated at 37°C for 48 hours the addition of INT. The MBC was defined as the lowest concentration of samples which completely inhibited the growth of bacteria. Samples were tested alone and in the presence of PAβN at 30 μg/mL final concentration [22].

To evaluate the potentiating effect of tested extracts, a preliminary combination at their sub-inhibitory concentrations (MIC/2, MIC/5, MIC/10 and MIC/20) with antibiotics was assessed against P. aeruginosa PA124 strain. The appropriate sub-inhibitory concentrations were then selected on the basis of their ability to improve the activity of the maximum antibiotic. These sub-inhibitory concentrations for selected extracts were further tested in combination with antibiotics against more MDR bacteria. The Fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) of each combination was then calculated as the ratio of MIC of Antibiotic in combination versus MIC of Antibiotic alone [23, 24].


Phytochemical composition of the tested plant’s extracts

The results of the qualitative phytochemical analysis showed that each of the studied extract contained alkaloids, phenols, flavonoids, triterpenes and sterols. None of them contained anthocyanins and anthraquinones. Other phytochemical classes have been selectively detected as shown in Table 2.

Antibacterial activity of the plant’s extracts

Bacterial strains and MDR isolates were tested for their susceptibility to plant extracts and chloramphenicol. The results summarized in Table 4 the selectivity of the extracts towards the tested bacteria, with MIC values ranging from 256 to 1024 μg/mL on the majority of the 22 tested microorganisms. Capsicum frutescens extract displayed the largest spectrum of activity, 73% (16/22) against the tested bacteria; followed by Brassica oleacera var. italica, 50% (11/22); Basilicum polystachyon 41% (9/22) and Brassica oleacera var. butyris 27% (6/22) extracts. The lowest MIC value (256 μg/mL) was recorded with Basilicum polystachyon extract against P. stuartii (ATCC 29916) and E. aerogenes (ATCC 13048). No significant MBC value was recorded.

Table 4 MIC and MBC of the tested plants extracts and CHL on the studied bacterial species

Eight (8) of the twenty two (22) studied MDR bacteria were also tested for their susceptibility to the plant extracts in the presence of PAβN (Table 5). The largest spectrum of activity was recorded with B. oleacera var. butyris extract against 75% (6/8) tested MDR bacteria. This efflux pumps inhibitor (EPI) also improved the activity of C. frutescens extract against E. coli (AG100), K. pneumoniae (KP53) and E. aerogenes (EA27) as well as that of B. polystachyon against P. stuartii (NAE16).

Table 5 Antibacterial activities of extracts alone and in the presence of PAβN

Antibacterial activity of extract-antibiotic combination

A preliminary assay against P. aeruginosa PA124 strain allowed selecting MIC/2 and MIC/5 as appropriate sub-inhibitory concentrations to be used on other bacteria (Table 6). Synergistic effects were observed with all the tested extracts. Brassica oleacera var. italica and B. oleacera var. butyris extracts potentiate (0.125 < FIC < 0.5 and 0.031 < FIC < 0.5 respectively) the effects of the majority of antibiotics on most of the tested MDR bacteria (Table 7). Extracts from C. frutescens and B. polystachyon showed synergistic effects with six of the nine studied antibiotics, with 0.125 < FIC < 0.5 and 0.25 < FIC < 0.5 respectively.

Table 6 MICs of antibiotics in combination with plant extracts against P. aeruginosa PA124
Table 7 MIC of antibiotics in combination with plant at their MIC/2 and MIC/5 against selected MDR bacteria strains


The Pharmacological potencies of plants’ secondary metabolites are well demonstrated. The qualitative phytochemical screening of the plant extracts showed the presence of several classes of secondary metabolites, such as alkaloids, flavonoids, phenols, triterpenes, sterols, saponins, tannins and coumarins. Several antibacterial activities associated to the presence of compounds belonging to these various classes were shown [2527]. It should however be mentioned that the detection of an alleged bioactive class of secondary metabolite in a plant is not a guarantee for any biological property, as this will depend on the nature of the compounds as well as their concentrations and the possible interactions with other constituents [12]. The differences observed between the antibacterial activities of the extracts as observed in the present work could be due to the differences in their phytochemical composition [9]. According to the criteria of classification of the antibacterial activity of the phytochemicals [28], the extracts used in this study were moderately and/or weak active (256 ≤ MIC < 1024 μg/mL). Their direct use in the control of MDR bacterial infections could therefore be of limited importance. None-the-less, the obtained results can be considered as interesting when considering the fact that the extracts are obtained directly from edible plant materials.

Efflux pumps are responsible for the reduction of intracellular concentration of antibacterial compounds [29]. To tackle problems related to this phenomenon, an intensive search of efflux pumps inhibitors (EPI) is welcome [30]. The EPI blocks the efflux pumps and leads to the increase of the intracellular concentration of active principle contents of the extracts [29, 31]. The activity of B. oleacera var. butyris extract against the tested bacteria in the presence of PAβN, increased in 75% of the cases. This suggests that some compounds present in this extract could be substrates of efflux pumps [31, 32].

The extracts of B. oleacera var. butyris, B. oleracea var. Italica, Basilicum polystachyon and C. frutescens showed significant synergistic effects (0.031 < FIC < 0.5) with the majority of the tested antibiotics against the studied MDR strains. This suggests that the extracts might contain bioactive compounds that, combined with antibiotics, acted at different sites by various mechanisms [33, 34]. These data indicate that a combination of these extracts with antibiotics could be envisaged to fight MDR bacteria.


These results provide promising baseline information for the potential use of Capsicum frutescens, Brassica oleacera var. italica, Basilicum polystachyon and Brassica oleacera var. butyris, independently or in combination with some commonly used antibiotics in the fight against MDR Gram-negative bacteria.


  1. 1.

    Hancock EW: Mechanisms of action of newer antibiotics for Gram-positive pathogens. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005, 5: 209-218.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lomovskaya O, Bostian KA: Practical applications and feasibility of efflux pump inhibitors in the clinic–a vision for applied use. Biochem Pharmacol. 2006, 71: 910-918.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Noumedem JAK, Mihasan M, Kuiate JR, Stefan M, Cojocaru M, Dzoyem JP, Kuete V: In vitro antibacterial and antibiotic-potentiation activities of four edible plants against multidrug-resistant gram-negative species. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013, 13: 190-

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Patrick H, Ngai K, Ng TB: A lectin with antifungal and mitogenic activities from red cluster pepper (Capsicum frutescens) seeds. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007, 74: 366-371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Koffi-Nevry R, Kouassi CK, Nanga ZY, Koussémon M, Loukou GY: Antibacterial Activity of Two Bell Pepper Extracts: Capsicum annuum L and Capsicum frutescens. Int J Food Prop. 2012, 15: 961-971.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ooi LS, Ng TB, Geng Y, Ooi VE: Lectins from bulbs of the Chinese daffodil Narcissus tazetta (family Amaryllidaceae). J Biochem Cell Biol. 2000, 78: 463-468.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    YuL G, Milton JD, Fernig DG: Opposite effects on human colon cancer cell proliferation of two dietary Thomsen–Friedenreichantigen-binding lectins. J Cell Physiol. 2001, 186: 282-287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jeffery EH, Araya M: Physiological effects of broccoli consumption. Phytochem Rev. 2009, 8: 283-298.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Stergiopoulou T, De Lucca AJ, Meletiadis J, Sein T, Boue SM, Schaufele R, Roilides E, Ghannoum M, Walsh TJ: In vitro activity of CAY-1, a saponin from Capsicum frutescens, against Microsporum and Trichophyton species. Med Mycol. 2008, 46: 805-810.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Farzinebrahimi R, Mattaha R, Fadainasab M, Mokhtari S: In vitro plant regeneration, antioxidant and antibacterial studies on broccoli, Brassica oleracea var. italic a. Diagn Micr Infec Dis. 2012, 44: 2117-2122.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Katayoon D, Akram T, Mahdi V: Investigation of Antipseudomanal Activity of Brassica Napus L. 2011, Singapore: Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kyung KH, Fleming HP: Antimicrobial activity of sulfur compounds derived from cabbage. J Food Prot. 1997, 60: 67-71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Charkraborty D, Mandal SM, Charkraborty J, Bhattacharyaa PK, Bandyopadhyay A, Mitra A, Gupta K: Antimicrobial Activity of Leaf Extract of Basilicum polystachyon (L) Moench. Ind J Exp Biol. 2007, 45: 744-748.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Monks TJ, Hanzlik RP, Cohen GM, Ross D, Graham DG: Quinone chemistry and toxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1992, 112: 2-16.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lorenzi V, Muselli A, Bernadini AF, Berti L, Pagès JM: Geraniol restores Antibiotic activities against multidrug resistant isolates from Gram-negatives species. Antimicrob Agent Chemother. 2009, 53: 2209-2211.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Harborne JB: Phytochemical methods: A guide to modern techniques of plant analysis. 1973, London, UK: Chapman & Hall Pub, 3

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kuete V, Alibert-Franco S, Eyong KO, Ngameni B, Folefoc GN, Nguemeving JR, Tangmouo JG, Fotso GW, Komguem J, Ouahouo BMW, Bolla JM, Chevalier J, Ngadjui BT, Nkengfack AE, Pagès JM: Natural products against bacteria expressing multidrug resistant phenotype. Intl J Antimicrob Ag. 2011, 37: 156-161.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ghisalberti D, Masi M, Pagès JM, Chevalier J: Chloramphenicol and expression of multidrug efflux pump in Enterobacter aerogenes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005, 328: 1113-1118.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Fankam AG, Kuete V, Voukeng IK, Kuiate JR, Pagès JM: Antibacterial activities of selected Cameroonian spices and their synergistic effects with antibiotics against multidrug-resistant phenotypes. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2011, 11: 104-

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mativandlela SPN, Lall N, Meyer JJM: “Antibacterial, antifungal and antitubercular activity of (the roots of) Pelargonium reniforme (CURT) and Pelargonium sidoides (DC) (Geraniaceae) root extracts”. S Afr J Bot. 2006, 72 (2): 232-237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kuete V, Ngameni B, Simo CCF, Tankeu RK, Ngadjui BT, Meyer JJM, Lall N, Kuiate JR: Antimicrobial activity of the crude extracts and compounds from Ficus chlamydocarpa and Ficus cordata (Moraceae). J Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 120: 17-24.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Braga LC, Leite AAM, Xavier KGS, Takahashi JA, Bemquerer MP, Chartone-Souza E, Nascimento AMA: Synergic interaction between pomegranate extract and antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus. Can J Microbiol. 2005, 51 (7): 541-547.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Coutinho HD, Vasconcellos A, Freire-Pessoa HL, Gadelha CA, Gadelha TS, Almeida-Filho GG: Natural products from the termite Nasutiter mescorniger lower aminoglycoside minimum inhibitory concentrations. Pharmacognosy Mag. 2010, 6: 1-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Perret S, Whitfield PJ, Sanderson L, Bartlett A: The plant molluscide Millettia thomingu (Leguminosae) as a tropical anti schistosamal agent. J Ethnopharmacol. 1995, 47: 49-54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Fernandez MA, Garcia MD, Saenz MT: Antimicrobial activity of the phenolic acids fractions of Scrophularia frutescens and Scrophularia sambucifolia. Pak J Bot. 1996, 53: 11-14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Peres MTLP, Monache FD, Cruz AB, Pizzolatti MG, Ynes RA: Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of croton Urucurana baillon (Euphorbiacecae). J Ethnopharmacol. 1997, 56: 223-226.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Brunetton J: Pharmacognosie: Phytochimie, Plantes medicinales. 1999, Paris: Bourin, F, 263-309. 3

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kuete V, Ngami B, Tangmouo JG, Bolla JM, Alibert-Franco S, Ngadjui BT, Pagès JM: Efflux Pumps are involved in the defense of Gram-Negative Bacterial against the natural products Isobavachalcone and Diospyrone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010, 54 (5): 1749-1752.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bohnert JA, Winfried VK: Selected arylpiperazines are capable of reversing multidrug resistance in Escherichia coli over expressing RND Efflux Pumps. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005, 49: 849-852.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hasdemir UO, Chevalier J, Nordmann P, Pagès JM: Detection and prevalence of active drug efflux mechanism in various multidrug efflux mechanisms in various multidrug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains from Turkey. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 2701-2706.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Pagès JM, Amaral L: Mechanisms of drug efflux and strategies to combat them: challenging the efflux pump of Gram-negative bacteria. Biochem Biophys Acta. 2009, 1794: 826-833.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Marquez B: Bacterial efflux systems and efflux pumps inhibitors. Biochimie. 2005, 87: 1137-1147.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lomovskaya O, Watkins W: Inhibition of efflux pumps as a novel approach to combat drug resistance in bacteria. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001, 3 (2): 225-236.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kuete V, Nana F, Ngameni B, Mbaveng AT, Keumedjio F, Ngadjui BT: Antimicrobial activity of the crude extract, fractions and compounds from stem bark of Ficus ovata (Moraceae). J Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 124: 556-561.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

Download references


Authors are thankful to the Cameroon National Herbarium (Yaounde) for plants identification.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor Kuete.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

FTK carried out the study; VK designed the experiments. FTK, AJS, AGF and VK wrote the manuscript; VK, JAKN and DED supervised the work; VK provided the bacterial strains; all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Touani, F.K., Seukep, A.J., Djeussi, D.E. et al. Antibiotic-potentiation activities of four Cameroonian dietary plants against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria expressing efflux pumps. BMC Complement Altern Med 14, 258 (2014).

Download citation


  • Cameroonian dietary plants
  • Potentiation
  • Gram–negative bacteria
  • Multidrug resistant
  • Efflux pumps