- Research article
- Open Access
Potential effectiveness of traditional Chinese medicine for cardiac syndrome X (CSX): a systematic review and meta-analysis
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine volume 13, Article number: 62 (2013)
Treatment of cardiac syndrome X with unknown pathological mechanism remains a big challenge for clinicians. Complementary and alternative medicine may bring a new choice for its management. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical effects of traditional Chinese medicine on cardiac syndrome X patients.
We systematically searched databases such as Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE, CBM, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang and VIP, and handsearched relevant journals to identify randomized controlled trials. Following the steps of systematic review recommended by the Cochrane group, we assessed the quality of included studies, extracted valid data and undertook meta-analysis.
Twenty one moderate-to low-quality randomized controlled trials involving 1143 patients were included. The results showed that traditional Chinese medicine could improve angina [OR=1.34, 95% CI: 1.2 to 1.50], electrocardiogram (ECG), endothelin-1 (ET-1) levels, prolong exercise duration in treadmill tests, and reduce angina frequency per week compared with routine treatment. No other side effect was reported except two cases of stomach pain.
Compared with conventional treatment, traditional Chinese medicine shows the potential of optimizing symptomatic outcomes and improving ECG and exercise duration. The efficacy of TCM may find explanation in its pharmacological activity of adjusting the endothelial function. TCM, as a kind of alternative and complementary medicine, may provide another choice for CSX patients.
Cardiac syndrome X (CSX, also called microvascular angina) refers to typical stable angina that is exclusively or predominantly induced by effort. Upon diagnostic investigation, findings are comparable to those of myocardial ischemia, showing normal or near-normal coronary arteries on angiography and an absence of any other specific cardiac diseases (e.g., variant angina, cardiomyopathy, or valvular diseases) . Approximately 10% to 20% of affected patients suspected to have angina reportedly turned out to have negative coronary angiogram results . Although the long-term prognosis of CSX does not necessarily include increased mortality, patients’ quality of life is invariably affected and the incidence rates of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events are increased . Exacerbated and recurrent angina may also lead to physical discomfort, frequent hospital readmissions, or even repeat coronary angiography, imposing patients with a huge economic burden . Moreover, patients with CSX tend to show high scores on psychological inventories that measure anxiety and depression .
The etiology and pathology of CSX remain unclear. Although hypotheses claiming that the disease is associated with endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, oxidative stress, or estrogen deficiency have been formulated, they lack evidence [6, 7]. Internationally, conventional drugs against ischemia, such as beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, xanthine derivatives, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, estrogen, and statins, are recommended for clinical use in patients with CSX. However, their respective curative effects remain controversial [8–10]. We believe that alternative and complementary medicine may provide additional treatment options. As more papers on treatment with Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) were published in recent years, it was suggested that Chinese herbs might bring health benefits for patients with CSX . TCM has a unique system of interpreting the etiology and pathology of CSX , allowing this syndrome to be treated accordingly. Moreover, modern pharmacological studies have found that the active ingredients in many of these herbs have functions related to endothelial protection, anti-inflammation, antioxidative stress, and improvement of estrogen function, all of which are believed to be effective in the pathology of CSX [12–17]. Therefore, the relatively inexpensive TCM treatment for CSX is worthy of attention. This study aimed to systematically and objectively evaluate the clinical curative effect and safety of TCM for CSX based on a general understanding of previous research on CSX.
This systematic review is conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- analyses: Additional file 1: The PRISMA Statement.
Data for this study was acquired through previously published work, no patient or hospital data was accessed. Therefore, written consent and institutional ethical review was not required for this research.
We systematically searched for studies on CSX published in either Chinese or English. The databases that were searched included the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 3, 2011), PubMed (1978–2011.9), EMBASE (1995–2011), MEDLINE (1984–2010.5), CINAL (1984–2010.5), CNKI (1980–2011), CBM disc (1981–2011.9), WANFANF (1980–2011.9), and VIP (1989–2011.9). The search strategy was formulated using MeSH terms in combination with free words. Details of the search strategy for the English databases are as follows:
Cardiac Syndrome X
X Syndrome, Angina
Angina X Syndrome
Angina X Syndromes
Syndrome, Angina X
Syndrome X, Cardiac
Angina Pectoris with Normal Coronary Arteriogram
Syndrome X, Angina
Angina Syndrome X
Angina Syndrome Xs
Syndrome Xs, Angina
Chinese medicine [All Fields]
(1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or 7 or 8 or 9 or 10 or 11 or 12) [Title/Abstract]
13 AND 14
Details of the search strategy for the Chinese databases are as follows:
The Chinese characters used to perform the search are hereafter stated in Chinese pinyin
(Zhuti (title/abstract) = xinzangXzonghezheng (cardiac syndrome X) or weixueguanxingxinjiaotong (microvasculature)
We also checked the references of literature for possible identification of relevant studies. Electronically inaccessible journal articles were manually retrieved.
The study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT).
The study includes participants diagnosed with CSX by the criteria listed in ANGINA PECTORIS AND NORMAL CORONARY ARTERIES: CARDIAC SYNDROME X.
The study includes intervention and comparison of any of the following:
TCM + routine treatment* vs. routine treatment
TCM + routine treatment vs. routine treatment + placebo.
TCM vs. routine treatment
*Routine treatment includes nitrate medications, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and calcium channel blockers, as recommended in the essay Therapeutic Options for the Management of Patients with Cardiac Syndrome X.
Outcomes to be measured include symptom improvement and electrocardiograph (ECG) changes and/or treadmill test results. Any adverse event defined in “ICH—GCP 1997”  should be recorded.
We excluded studies with unclear diagnostic criteria and without full texts or the use of other TCM therapeutic methods except herbs. Intervention for the treatment group was limited to Chinese herbs. Combinations of herbs and other forms of treatment (e.g., acupuncture or moxibustion) were excluded.
Two researchers (W.J.Y. and X.L.) independently undertook the aforementioned search and managed the search results using Note Express 2 software. Ineligible studies were excluded after reading the title and abstract, and the full texts of the remaining studies were scanned for confirmation. When disagreement arose between the two researchers, they sought help from a third reviewer (S.H.C.).
Both researchers (W.J.Y. and X.L.) independently extracted data from all included studies and input them into two Excel sheets. One sheet contained the general information of the studies, including the authors’ names (the first author was listed if there was more than one), publication date, sample size, age of participants, gender, interventions and comparisons, treatment courses, and outcomes. The other sheet included items for quality assessment listed in the Cochrane risk of bias tool . The above information was then carefully checked by two other researchers (C.J. and Z.S.). Any disagreement was resolved through discussion, and errors were corrected.
The two researchers (W.J.Y. and X.L.) used Review Manager 5.0.2, provided by the Cochrane corporative network, to analyze the data. Effect measures were presented using odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous data and weighted mean differences (WMD) or standardized mean differences (SMD) for continuous data, both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The chi-square test was used to test heterogeneity across studies  with a significance level of 0.05. Data were analyzed with a fixed-effect model if no statistical heterogeneity was observed (P > 0.05 or I2 < 50%). In the presence of heterogeneity, the two researchers (W.J.Y. and X.L.) checked the data entered and explored the variation by conducting subgroup analysis. If the variation could not be explained, we performed a random-effects meta-analysis and interpreted the effect measure with care. A funnel plot was formed to detect publication bias .
Subgroup analysis, sensitivity, and meta-regression
Subgroup analysis was conducted to show the magnitudes of the effects in different subgroups and determine whether there was a different effect of an intervention in different situations. Meta-regression analysis was conducted to identify possible causes for differences across the groups.
A total of 903 studies (900 in Chinese and 3 in English) were identified through electronic searches; 101 of them were included for further assessment after both researchers examined the title and abstract of all studies and excluded duplicates, animal experiments, reviews, and others. We read the full texts of all 101 articles and discovered and excluded other ineligible studies. The final result included 21 articles [24–44], all in Chinese (see Figure 1).
General characteristics of the included studies
All 21 RCTs, which involved 1143 patients aged 35 to 76 years, were published between 2002 and 2011. In all studies excluding two (Liu 2008 and Zhu 2003), female participants outnumbered male participants. Treatment courses ranged from 7 days to 1 year. In one study (Xv 2002), the duration was 7 days, and in another study (Wang 2009), it was 14 days. The treatment length was 15 days in three studies34,36,42 and 28 days in nine studies. The longest treatment length (Lu 2007) was 84 days. The other two studies (Liu 2008 and Zhu 2003) did not report the medication treatment course. Only two studies (Bi 2003 and Xv 2002) reported follow-up data.
Of the 21 RCTs, 12 compared TCM plus routine treatment with routine treatment alone, eight compared TCM with routine treatment, and the remaining RCT (Liang 2005) compared TCM combined with routine treatment versus placebo, which were combined with routine treatment. TCM interventions included Chinese patented drugs (12 studies), decoction (seven studies), and injection (two studies). With regard to outcome measures, angina improvement was reported in 15 studies, angina frequency in nine studies, and treadmill test results in 11 studies. Eight trials used ECG improvement as the primary outcome measure, two trials used TCM syndrome improvement, and seven used changes in cytokine levels such as endostatin ET-1 or C-reactive protein (CRP). Only one study reported fractional flow reserve. Ten studies reported safety outcomes (see Table 1).
Quality assessment of the included studies
All 21 articles mentioned the word “randomization,” but only two studies (Sun 2007 and Bi 2003) elaborated on the randomization method (random number table). Only two studies (Peng 2011 and Niu 2008) mentioned the performance of single blinding. None mentioned allocation concealment or intention-to-treat analysis (see Table 2).
Efficacy and safety analysis
The 21 RCTs were divided into two subgroups for further analysis with consideration of clinical heterogeneity across the studies. Group A (13 studies) compared TCM plus routine treatment with routine treatment alone, while Group B (eight studies) evaluated the effects of TCM relative to routine treatment. One study that compared the effects of TCM plus routine treatment with that of placebo plus routine treatment was assigned to Group A. Descriptions and interpretations of angina and ECG improvement for patients in all studies followed the rules prescribed in the Efficacy Criteria for Angina of Coronary Heart Disease. TCM syndromes were determined against the same criteria: Guideline for Clinical Research of Chinese Medicine (New Drug).
Group A: TCM + RT vs. RT
Nine studies involving 239 participants in the treatment group reported angina improvement. No statistical heterogeneity was found among these studies (P = 0.13 > 0.05, I2 = 36%) (see Figure 2). The results showed that TCM combined with routine treatment was more effective than routine treatment alone (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.2–1.50).
Eight studies reported the patients’ angina frequency per week. A random-effect model was applied because obvious heterogeneity was observed among these studies, as seen in Figure 3 (P < 0.00001, I2 = 94%). The results indicated that patients in the treatment group experienced angina almost five times less frequently than those in the control group (WMD = −4.91, 95% CI = −6.56 to −3.25).
Nine studies reported outcomes of the Bruce Protocol Treadmill Test. Either exercise duration or the time to 1-mm ST segment depression was recorded. Exercise duration (measured in seconds) is known to be a health predictor for patients with coronary heart disease  and was reported in seven of the nine studies (excluding Wu 2010 and Li 2009). A random-effect model was applied because obvious heterogeneity was observed (P < 0.0001, I2 = 79%) (see Figure 4). Patients in the TCM plus routine treatment group had a nearly 1-min improvement in exercise duration (WMD = 77.31, 95% CI = 39.70–114.93).
Five studies reported changes in ET-1 levels. As seen in Figure 5, statistical heterogeneity was observed and the units of outcomes varied; thus, a random-effect model was used (P = 0.002, P < 0.05, and I2 = 77%). Pooled results indicated greater effects of TCM combined with routine medicine in decreasing ET-1 levels (SMD = −1.12, 95% CI = −1.73 to −0.50).
Spearman correlation analysis using SAS9.1 software showed no correlation between angina improvement and reduced angina frequency or between angina improvement and changes in ET-1 levels.
Group B: TCM vs. RT
The forest plots in Figures 6 and 7 show no significant heterogeneity across studies (P = 0.55, I2 = 0% and P = 0.06, I2 = 60%, respectively). The pooled results showed OR = 1.45 (95% CI = 1.26–1.66) for angina improvement and OR = 1.24 (95% CI = 1.09–1.40) for ECG tests.
Sensitivity analysis and meta-regression
No statistical heterogeneity is observed in Figures 2, 6, or 7. However, clinical heterogeneity across trials still needs special attention. The final effect sizes were influenced by multiple factors such as sample size, medication course, publication year, and even different forms of Chinese medicine. As seen in Figures 3 and 4, meta-regression was conducted to test the reliability of the pooled analysis and search for possible causes for this heterogeneity. We conducted meta-regression by residual maximum likelihood (REML) with Knapp-Hartung modification. Tau2 was equal to 0.02809 in Table 3, 6.82 in Table 4, and 1700 in Table 5 as REML estimates of between-study variance. I2 was 0.02809%, 91.27%, and 61.44% in terms of the proportion of residual variation due to heterogeneity. The adjusted R2 value was equal to −684.96%, 15.63%, and 0.65%, with the proportion of between-study variance explained. Data in Tables 3, 4, and 5 suggest that these four clinical aspects of heterogeneity had no statistically significant effect on the final results. However, only four studies used an identical form and dosage of TCM intervention (Tongxinluo capsules), which shows that clinical heterogeneity existed and that its influence cannot be ruled out. According to statistical tests, the results shown in Figure 2 are more likely to reflect the real effects of TCM. Interpretation of the results in Figures 3 and 4 is controversial.
Safety analysis and publication bias
Ten of the 21 RCTs reported routine blood or urine examination results as well as liver and kidney function test results. No side effects were reported with the exception of one study (Li 2009) that reported two cases of stomachache in the treatment group. Funnel plot analysis (Figures 8 and 9) showed no significant publication bias.
The results of this study suggest that women are more likely to suffer from CSX based on the fact that patients were randomly recruited.
Improving patient outcomes is the primary goal of CSX management. Compared with routine Western medicine, TCM has the potential of being more effective in relieving symptoms, improving ECG results, and prolonging exercise duration in treadmill tests; however, these advantages were not obvious based on the evidence collected so far. The results in Groups A and B show that Chinese medicine with or without routine Western medicine could improve the degree of angina and reduce the frequency of angina attacks by five times per week. Besides these presenting symptoms of the patients, objective measurements such as ECG and treadmill testing also provided evidence. Because CSX and coronary heart disease share the same symptom of chest pain, the effective solution for the treatment of CSX may provide useful information in terms of symptom improvement for coronary heart disease. Studies in this field will be meaningful.
One mechanism of action of the Chinese herbal medicines prescribed to patients with CSX is believed to involve regulation of endothelial function. A number of cell factors, including ET-1, ET-21, CRP, hs-CRP, and ET-1, were measured and recorded in most of the involved studies. In addition, a comprehensive study (by one researcher, C.J.) of the pharmacological actions of all 48 types of herbs involved in TCM showed that these herbs can improve or protect endothelial function. Analysis of the forest plot also provided hints regarding this hypothesis. However, the undetected association between ET-1 levels and angina improvement in this study may have been caused by the small size of the studies.
Furthermore, we identified a total of 259 case reports and case series from our search, almost 12 times the number of RCTs conducted on this topic. Observational studies have been published since the early 1990s, whereas the first RCT was carried out in 2002. This shows TCM researchers’ growing interest in CSX studies and the difficulties they faced in conducting high-quality RCTs. However, observational studies might also be valuable resources for further research.
Finally, it should be pointed out that the outcomes reported in the included studies in this review were all short-term outcomes, such as symptom relief before and after treatment. The long-term effects of TCM on patients with CSX and its role in the prognosis were scarcely discussed. This may provide a starting point for future studies.
This research only included articles published in English and Chinese. Studies published in other languages were not considered. The sample sizes of the present studies were small, which may lead to bias. The 21 trials included in this review were of moderate to low quality. As a result, the evidence generated needs to be interpreted with caution.
Implications for further study
These clinical trials show that the basic mechanism of Chinese herbs in relieving chest pain mainly involves endothelial function and the ET-1 pathway. This should draw our attention because Chinese herbs may be helpful for developing and optimal for the treatment of CSX or even coronary heart disease. The methodology of RCTs should be modified in terms of double blinding and allocation concealment. Female patients suffering from CSX should receive more attention.
This review is the first to systematically evaluate the effects of TCM in the treatment of CSX, addressing the lack of this type of research. In conclusion, TCM shows potential in treating CSX, but its efficacy seems to be minor thus far. Rigorous and multicenter, large-scale clinical trials must be carried out to reveal the exact effectiveness of TCM.
Gaetano Antonio Lanza GA, Crea F: Primary coronary microvascular dysfunction clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and management. Circulation. 2010, 121: 2317-2325. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.900191.
Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow RO: Braunwald’s heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine. 2008, Philadelphia: Saunders-Elsevier, 8
Bi YF, Mao JY, Wang XL: Contemporary treatment of Western and Chinese medicine for cardiac syndrome X. Chin J Integr Med. 2011, 17 (4): 314-320. 10.1007/s11655-011-0714-2.
Di Monaco A, Lanza GA, Bruno I: Usefulness of impairment of cardiac adrenergic nerve function to predict outcome in patients with cardiac syndrome X. Am J Cardiol. 2010, 106 (12): 1813-1818. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.07.052.
Piegza M, Pudlo R, Badura-Brzoza K, Hese RT: Cardiac syndrome X from a psychosomatic point of view. Psychiatr Pol. 2008, 42 (2): 229-236.
Chen YX, Luo NS, Lin YQ: Selective estrogen receptor modulators promising for cardiac syndrome X. J Postgrad Med. 2010, 56: 328-331. 10.4103/0022-3859.70936.
Cannon RO: Microvascular angina and the continuing dilemma of chest pain with normal coronary angiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009, 54 (10): 877-885. 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.080.
Lamendola P, Tarzia P, Milo M: Coronary microvascular dysfunction: an update. Recenti Progerssi in Medicine. 2011, 102 (9): 329-337.
Lanza GA, Colonna G, Pasceri V, Maseri A: Atenolol versus amlodipine versus isosorbide 5-mononitrate on anginal symptoms in syndrome X. Am J Cardiol. 1999, 84: 854-856. 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00450-6.
Crea F, Lanza GA: Angina pectoris and normal coronary arteries. Heart. 2004, 90 (4): 457-463. 10.1136/hrt.2003.020594.
Mao JY, Wang HH, Ge YB: Treatment of cardiac syndrome X by traditional Chinese medicine. Chin J Integr Med On Cardio-/Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007, 5 (5): 377-379.
Chen NA, Kam Ming KO: Schisandrin B-induced glutathione antioxidant response and cardioprotection are mediated by reactive oxidant species production in rat hearts. Biol Pharm Bull. 2010, 33 (5): 825-829. 10.1248/bpb.33.825.
Lujun L, Yue Z, Peng Z, Huifang P, Hanli R: Appraisal of anti-inflammatory and free radical scavenging activities of ethanol extract of Ilex ficoidea Hemsl and Ilex centrochinensis. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011, 32 (2): 122-127. 10.1016/j.etap.2011.04.003.
Guo KJ, Xu SF, Yin P: Active components of common traditional Chinese medicine decoctions have antioxidant functions. J Anim Sci. 2011, 89 (10): 3107-3115. 10.2527/jas.2010-3831.
Huang MH, Wang BS, Chiu CS: Antioxidant, antinociceptive, and anti-inflammatory activities of Xanthii Fructus. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 135 (2): 545-552. 10.1016/j.jep.2011.03.057.
Zhao HY: Research of protection mechanism of compatible radix ophiopogonis, salvia miltiorrhiza and ethyl acetate on apoptosis of vascular endothelial cell (HUVEC). J Nanjing Univ Tradit Chin Med. 2010, 244 (03): 196-198.
Hu YF: The influence of different extractives of radix ophiophagous on vascular endothelial cell ICAM-1、VEGF、Bcl-2 interpretation due to hydrogen peroxide damage. Mod Med Prog. 2011, 18: 3421-3426.
Crea F, Gaetano A, Lanza : Angina pectoris and normalcoronary arteries: cardiac syndrome x. Heart. 2004, 90: 457-463. 10.1136/hrt.2003.020594.
Kaski JC, Valenzuela Garcia LF: Therapeutic options for the management of patients with cardiac syndrome X. Europe Heart J. 2001, 22 (4): 283-293. 10.1053/euhj.2000.2152.
International conference on Harmonization Expert Working Group: International Conference on Harmonization Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP). 1997,http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/article/safety-guidelines.html,
Higgins JTP, Green S: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2008, Chichester, UK: Wiley Online Library
Geha RS, Schneeberger E, Merler E, Rosen FS: Heterogeneity of acquired or common variable agammaglobulinemia. NEJM. 1974, 291: 1-6. 10.1056/NEJM197407042910101.
Sterne JAC, Egger M: Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001, 54: 1046-1055. 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00377-8.
Sun YY, Guo MS: 34 Case report of shenwuguanxinning medicinal granules on CSX patients. Jiangxi Tradit Chin Med J. 2007, 11 (11): 21-22.
Ge YL: 19 Case report of Qi and blood nourishing decoction on CSX patients. Shangdong Tradit Chin Med. 2011, 30 (1): 13-14.
Peng DG: The effect observation of yindanxinnaotong capsule on CSX. Chin J Integr Tradit West Med Cardiovasc Cerebrovasc Dis Mag. 2011, 9 (8): 746-747.
Niu TF, Li J, Xu HX: 30 Cases report of the Xinxuening medicinal granules on CSX. Chin J Integr Tradit West Med Cardiovasc Cerebrovasc Dis Mag. 2008, 6 (9): 1025-1027.
Gao AA: 33 Cases report of xiaoyao powder on the female microvascular angina. China’s Naturopath. 2005, 13 (5): 33-35.
Xu GX, Huang XT: The effect observation of wenxin kernel on CSX. Hubei Tradit Chin Med. 2011, 33 (4): 40-41.
Bi XP, Cai XJ, Wei F: The effect observation of tongxinluo capsule on CSX. Hebei Medical Journal. 2005, 27 (8): 587-
Wang XL, Mao JY, Wang HH: The clinical research of the kuanxiongliqi decoction on CSX. Shanghai Tradit Chin Med. 2009, 43 (1): 33-35.
Xu LJ, Wang WY: The influence of activating blood and removing stasis method on the ET-1 and endothelium-derived relaxation function of CSX patients. The Chin Patient Drug. 2002, 24 (7): 519-521.
Liu WJ, Wang ZS: The effect observation of naoxintong on 38 CSX cases. J Shanghai Univ Tradit Chin Med. 2008, 9 (2): 43-
Zhang XH, Song QF: 20 cases report of Taohongsiwu decoction on CSX. Chin J TCM Emerg. 2002, 11 (2): 137-
Hang LU, Rongrong MA: Clinical observation on the therapeutic effect of Tongxinluo capsule on patients with cardiac X syndrome complicated by abnormality of coronary artery flow reserve. Chin J Diffic and Compl Cas. 2007, 6 (11): 655-657.
Xiaohong Z, Yanping J: Clinical observation of decoction for removing blood stasis in the treatment of 37 cases of X syndrome. J Hennan Univ Chin Med. 2003, 18 (2): 59-
Liang C, Xiao S, Yusheng REN, Chengbo SUN, Zonggui WU: Effect of Lei 's danshen tablets on treatment and the level of C-reaction protein in patients with cardiac syndrome X. Chin Patient Drug. 2007, 1: 21-23.
Yuan J, Wang Q: Clinical effect observation of danhong injection on CSX. J Emerg Tradit Chin Med. 2008, 17 (10): 1339-1340.
Wang G, Cao Y: Clinical observation on 18 cases of cardiac X-syndrome treated by guanmailing prescription. Hunan J Tradit Chin Med. 2008, 24 (2): 1-3.
Zhang S, Ni J, Wei S: Clinical effect observation of guanmaining prescription on CSX. Modern J Integr Tradit Chin West Med. 2008, 17 (10): 1511-
Zhang X: 48 Cases report of soothing the liver and regulating Qi method on CSX. J Emerg Tradit Chin Med. 2008, 17 (11): 1608-1609.
Wu L, Sun J, Wang C: The clinical study of cardiac X- syndrome treated with shuxuening parenteral solution. Chin J Integr Med Cardio-/Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010, 8 (6): 652-653.
Shuyan LI, Qi T: 36 Cases report of the tongxinluo capsule combined with western medicine on CSX. Yunan Tradit Chin Med. 2009, 30 (11): 15-16.
Zhanbin P, Chongming LI, Cheng R, Yuan B: Clinical study of tongxinluo capsule on CSX. J Bethune Military Med College. 2005, 3 (1): 25-26.
Meeting for treatment and prevention of angina of coronary heart disease and arrhythmia by integrated western and Chinese medicine; efficacy criteria for angina of coronary heart disease. J Tradit Chin Med. 1996, 16 (10): 583-
Zheng YY: Guidelines for clinical research of Chinese medicine (New drugs). 2002, Beijing: Chinese Medicine and Science Publication House, 68-73. 2
Marshall AJ, Hutchings F, James AJ, Kelion AD: Prognostic value of a nine-minute treadmill test in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Am J Cardiol. 2010, 106 (10): 1423-1428. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.074.
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/13/62/prepub
This research was supported by the New Century Talents Supporting Program (NCET-09-0900) of the Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China and the National Major Scientific and the General Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81273935).
No competing financial interests exist.
SHC and MJY developed the idea and designed the research. WJY developed the search strategy, ran the search strategy with CJ, selected which studies to include and extracted data from studies with XL, interpreted the analysis and drafted the final review. MW obtained copies of studies and revised the writing. ZJB carried out the analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Electronic supplementary material
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Jy., Xiao, L., Chen, J. et al. Potential effectiveness of traditional Chinese medicine for cardiac syndrome X (CSX): a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Complement Altern Med 13, 62 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-13-62
- Traditional Chinese Medicine
- Fractional Flow Reserve
- Standardize Mean Difference
- Weighted Mean Difference
- Routine Treatment