Skip to main content
Download PDF

Antidepressant-like effects of a water-soluble extract from the culture medium of Ganoderma lucidum mycelia in rats

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine volume 13, Article number: 370 (2013) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Ganoderma lucidum is a popular medicinal mushroom used for promoting health and longevity in Asian countries. Previously, we reported that a water-soluble extract from a culture medium of Ganoderma lucidum mycelia (MAK) exerts antioxidative and cerebroprotective effects against ischemia–reperfusion injury in vivo. Here, we evaluated the antidepressant and anxiolytic activities of MAK in rats.

Methods

MAK (0.3 or 1 g/kg, p.o.) was administered in the experimental animals 60 min before the forced swimming, open-field, elevated plus-maze, contextual fear-conditioning, and head twitch tests. Additionally, the mechanisms involved in the antidepressant-like action of MAK were investigated by the serotonin precursor 5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan (5-HTP)- or 5-HT2A agonist (±)-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane hydrochloride (DOI)-induced head twitch responses.

Results

Treatment with MAK (1 g/kg) exhibited antidepressant-like effects in the forced swimming test, attenuated freezing behavior in the contextual fear-conditioning test, and decreased the number of head twitches induced by DOI, but not with 5-HTP. No significant response was observed in locomotion or anxiety-like behavior, when the animals were evaluated in the open-field or elevated plus-maze test, respectively.

Conclusions

These data suggest that MAK has antidepressant-like potential, which is most likely due to the antagonism of 5-HT2A receptors, and possesses anxiolytic-like effects toward memory-dependent and/or stress-induced anxiety in rats.

Peer Review reports

Background

Major depressive disorder is a common, recurrent mental disease characterized by a negative mood and loss of interest or pleasure in the normal activities of daily life. It is often accompanied by a broad range of symptoms, including a decline in cognitive function, sleep disturbance and recurrent suicidality, which affects the quality-of-life (QoL) and mortality of patients. Experimental and clinical studies have suggested that major depression may be caused at least in part by the metabolic dysregulation of monoaminergic (particularly serotonin and noradrenaline) systems in the brain [1]. Drugs that increase the levels of monoamines, such as tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), are the mainstays of depression therapy. However, these conventional, commercially available antidepressants provide only partial remission and frequently produce adverse effects [2]. Therefore, not all of the neurological pathogeneses of depression can be explained by the metabolic dysfunction of monoamines. As a result of these limitations, there is an appreciable unmet medical need for rapid, safe, and more effective antidepressants.

Recently, plant extracts have drawn the attention of researchers because of the importance in discovering novel antidepressant agents. Several herbal medicines (e.g., Panax notoginseng[3], Asparagus racemosus[4], Rosmarinus officinalis[5], and St. John’s wort [6]) have been reported to have antidepressant activity comparable with prescription medicines but with fewer side effects.

Ganoderma lucidum (G. lucidum) is a popular medicinal fungus known as Lingzhi mushroom in China. It has long been known for its beneficial effects on human health and longevity in Asian countries. G. lucidum has been shown to have several pharmacological effects (e.g., antitumor, immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, antioxidative), which are supported by studies on various bioactive compounds isolated from the fruiting bodies and mycelia of this fungus [7]. A water-soluble extract prepared from the culture medium of G. lucidum mycelia (MAK) has a 17-year history of making appreciable contributions to consumers’ health as a safe, functional food. The extract contains various types of constituents, such as polysaccharides, including β-glucans, triterpenes, and lignin derived from the culture medium and its digestion products by the mycelia. MAK has been reported to have antitumor [8] and radioprotective effects [9].

Previously, we demonstrated that MAK has antioxidant activities and neuroprotective effects in vivo. Orally administered MAK can prevent ischemia–reperfusion-induced oxidative damage to neuronal cells, and reduce the size of cerebral infarcts in animal models [10, 11]. However, until now, the antidepressant-like effects of MAK have not been assessed.

Therefore, the study aimed to assess the antidepressant-like and anxiolytic-like activities of MAK in rats. We performed the forced swimming test together with open-field test to evaluate antidepressant-like activity, and the elevated plus-maze test and contextual fear-conditioning test to evaluate anxiolytic-like activity of MAK. Furthermore, to ascertain if the antidepressant-like effect of MAK is mediated by the serotonergic system, we examined the effect of MAK on 5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan (5-HTP)- or (±)-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane hydrochloride (DOI)-induced head-twitch responses.

Methods

All experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines set by the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD, USA) and approved by the Animal Investigation Committee of Josai University (number H23005). All possible efforts were made to minimize the number of animals utilized and their suffering.

Animals

Male Sprague–Dawley rats (250–300 g) were purchased from Sankyo Labo Service Co. Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). Three or four animals were housed per cage in a temperature-controlled environment (23 ± 0.5°C) with a 12-h light–dark cycle (light on at 7 am) with food and water ad libitum. One hundred and thirty-three rats (forced swimming test, 25; open-field test, 21; elevated plus-maze test, 28; contextual fear-conditioning test, 23; 5-HTP-induced head-twitches, 18; DOI-induced head-twitches, 18) were used in the present study.

Drug treatment

MAK was provided by Noda Shokukin-kogyo Co. Ltd. (Noda, Japan). The preparation of MAK (overall yield, ≈ 10%) was as follows: a pure culture of G. lucidum mycelia was inoculated into a solid culture medium that was composed of bagasse and defatted rice bran and cultured until just before the formation of the fruit body (for 3–4 months); subsequently, the entire medium overgrown with G. lucidum mycelia was extracted with hot water, and then the extract was sterilized by filtration and lyophilized for powderization. Fluvoxamine maleate, imipramine hydrochloride, 5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan (5-HTP), and (±)-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane hydrochloride (DOI) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA). Drugs were dissolved in distilled water except 5-HTP and DOI, which were dissolved in saline. MAK (0.3 or 1 g/kg), imipramine (10 mg/kg) as a positive control, or distilled water was administered orally 60 min before the forced swimming test, open-field test, elevated plus-maze test, or contextual fear-conditioning test.

Forced swimming test

The experiment was carried out according to the method described by Porsolt et al. [12] with a minor modification. Briefly, on the first day (pre-test session), rats were placed individually in a clear cylinder (20-cm diameter, 50-cm height) that contained water (25 ± 1°C) to a depth of 25 cm and forced to swim for 15 min. Subsequently, rats were removed from the cylinder, dried with towels, and warmed by a heater before being returned to their home cages. The water in the tank was replaced after it was used by each animal. On the following day (test session), rats were placed back into the cylinder for 5 min. A 5-s sampling procedure [13] was utilized for scoring the behaviors (i.e., immobility, climbing, and swimming). Immobility was noted if the rat remained floating in the water without struggling and only made movements to keep its head or nose above the water. “Climbing” was defined as the animal making upwardly directed vigorous movements of the forepaws usually along the cylinder wall while keeping its head and shoulders above the water. “Swimming” was defined as horizontal movement throughout the cylinder with a more vigorous motion of all four paws than that necessary to merely maintain the head above the water.

Open-field test

Locomotor activity was assessed by the open-field test following a protocol described previously [14]. The open-field apparatus comprised a gray box (70 cm × 70 cm; 40-cm height) divided into 49 squares of equal area (10 cm × 10 cm). At the start of each test, rats were placed in the center of the open field and allowed to explore the inside of the box. Behavior was monitored using a video camera that was positioned above the apparatus during the 30-min test period. The number of lines crossing was analyzed automatically by a video-tracking system with a software package (CompACT VAS, Muromachi Kikai, Tokyo, Japan). The apparatus was cleaned with isopropanol after each test.

Elevated plus-maze test

To examine the exploratory behavior of rats, the elevated plus-maze was performed as described previously [15] with minor modifications. The apparatus (which was raised 50 cm above the floor) consisted of two opposing open arms (50-cm long × 10-cm wide) and two opposing closed arms of the same size surrounded by side walls (40-cm high) that extended from the central platform (10 cm × 10 cm). At the start of each test, rats were placed individually on the central platform, and their behaviors monitored by the video camera for 10 min. The number of entries for each arm and the time spent in each arm were recorded and analyzed automatically using CompACT VAS. The number of closed arm entries was used as an index of locomotor activity. The percentage of open arm entries (open arm entries × 100/ total arm entries) and percentage of time spent in open arm (time spent in open arm × 100/time spent in open and closed arms) were used as indices of anxiety.

Contextual fear-conditioning test

A footshock chamber that consisted of a plexiglass rectangular box (30 cm × 30 cm × 30 cm) with a floor of 18 stainless-steel rods (6-mm diameter) wired to a shock generator (LE 100-26, Panlab, Barcelona, Spain) was used to evaluate memory-dependent fear-related behavior. The experiment was done during 2 consecutive days. On the first day, each rat was exposed to the shock chamber for 5 min for adaptation to the experimental conditions, and then the rat received five inescapable electrical footshocks for a total of 2.5 min (0.5 mA, 2-s duration, repeated every 30 s). Five minutes after the last footshock, the rat was returned to his home cage. The following day (24 h later), the rat was placed into the same footshock chamber without footshocks. In the 10-min observation period, freezing behavior was recorded using a time-sampling procedure [16] in which animal behavior was classified as “freezing” or “activity” at 5-s intervals. Freezing behavior was defined as the absence of all movement with the exception of movements related to respiration and whisker movements [16]. The percentage scores for freezing were calculated for a 10-min observation period. Analyses of freezing behavior were evaluated by an investigator blinded to the treatment protocol.

Head-twitch test

The head-twitch test was carried out according a method described by Rojas-Corrales et al. [17] with minor modifications. Rats were orally treated with MAK (1 g/kg) or fluvoxamine (10 mg/kg) 60 min before intraperitoneal injection of 5-HTP (200 mg/kg). Immediately after 5-HTP administration, the rat was placed into an observation cage (30 cm × 25 cm × 18 cm) and the cumulative number of head twitches (i.e., rapid movements of the head with little or no involvement of the trunk) counted by an observer blinded to the study protocol for 30 min. Similarly, the effect of MAK on DOI (3 mg/kg)-induced head-twitch responses was measured.

Statistics analyses

Data are the mean ± S.E.M. Significant differences between groups were evaluated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Tukey’s post hoc test except for contextual fear-conditioning test, which by the Bonferroni’s test. P < 0.05 was considered significant. The statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism software (Graphpad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

Results

Forced swimming test

Figure 1 illustrates the effects of MAK on immobility, climbing, and swimming behaviors in the forced swimming test. MAK (1 g/kg) and the classical antidepressant imipramine reduced immobility (23% and 35%, respectively) in the forced swimming test compared with the distilled water-treated control group. One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in immobility ([F(3,21) = 11.09, P < 0.01]). Post hoc analyses indicated significant differences between the control group and the MAK (1 g/kg)-treated group (P < 0.05) and the imipramine-treated group (P < 0.01). Furthermore, one-way ANOVA revealed a significant differences in climbing ([F(3,21) = 7.33, P < 0.01]). Post hoc analyses indicated a significant difference between the control group and the imipramine-treated group (P < 0.01), but the difference between the control group and MAK-treated group was not significant.

Figure 1
figure1

Effects of MAK on the duration of immobility, climbing and swimming behaviors in the forced swimming test. Behaviors were scored every 5 s for a 5-min observation period. Results are the mean ± S.E.M. The number of rats per group was: control group, n = 8; MAK (0.3 g/kg)-treated group, n = 6; MAK (1 g/kg)-treated group, n = 6; imipramine-treated group, n = 5. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 compared with the control group, one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s test.

Full size image

Open-field test

To exclude the possibility of a false-positive effect in the forced swimming test, the effects of MAK on locomotor activity were tested. One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in locomotor activity ([F(3,17) = 3.55, P < 0.05]). Post hoc analyses indicated a significant difference between the control group and the imipramine-treated group (P < 0.05) (Figure 2).

Figure 2
figure2

Effects of MAK on locomotor activity in the open-field test. Results are the mean ± S.E.M. The number of crossings recorded for a 30-min period. The number of rats per group was: control group, n = 6; MAK (0.3 g/kg)-treated group, n = 5; MAK (1 g/kg)-treated group, n = 5; imipramine-treated group, n = 5. *P < 0.05 compared with the control group, one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s test.

Full size image

Elevated plus-maze test

No significant differences were detected for rats treated with MAK or imipramine compared with control rats on the number of closed arm entries ([F(3,24) = 0.79, P = 0.51]), the percentage of open arm entries ([F(3,24) = 0.08, P = 0.97]), or the percentage of time spent in open arms ([F(3,24) = 0.09, P = 0.97]) (Table 1).

Table 1 Effects of MAK on the elevated plus-maze test
Full size table

Contextual fear-conditioning test

In the contextual fear-conditioning test, the freezing rate was decreased to 49.6 ± 8.5% in the MAK (1 g/kg)-treated group compared with 72.8 ± 3.5% in the control group (Figure 3). One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in freezing behavior ([F(2,20) = 8.39, P < 0.01]). Post hoc analyses indicated a significant difference between the control group and the MAK (1 g/kg)-treated group (P < 0.05).

Figure 3
figure3

Effects of MAK on freezing behavior in the contextual fear-conditioning test. Results are the mean ± S.E.M. of freezing scored for a 10-min observation period. The number of rats per group was: control group, n = 9; MAK(0.3 g/kg)-treated group, n = 6; MAK (1 g/kg)-treated group, n = 8. *P < 0.05 compared with the control group, one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni’s test.

Full size image

5-HTP- or DOI-induced head twitches

Figure 4 shows the effect of MAK (1 g/kg) on 5-HTP-induced head twitches. One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in 5-HTP-induced head twitches ([F(2,15) = 33.4, P < 0.01]). Post hoc analyses indicated significant differences between the control group and fluvoxamine-treated group (P < 0.01), but the difference between the control group and MAK-treated group was not significant (P = 0.33). Figure 5 demonstrates the effect of MAK on DOI-induced head twitches. One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in DOI-induced head twitches ([F(2,15) = 25.2, P < 0.01]). Post hoc analyses indicated significant differences between the control group and MAK-treated group (P < 0.01).

Figure 4
figure4

Effects of MAK on 5-HTP-induced head twitches. Results are the mean ± S.E.M. of the number of head twitches for a 30-min observation period. The number of rats per group was: control group, n = 6; MAK-treated group, n = 6; fluvoxamine-treated group, n = 6. **P < 0.01 compared with the control group, one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s test.

Full size image
Figure 5
figure5

Effects of MAK on DOI-induced head twitches. Results are the mean ± S.E.M. of the number of head twitches for a 30-min observation period. The number of rats per group was: control group, n = 6; MAK-treated group, n = 6; fluvoxamine-treated group, n = 6. **P < 0.01 compared with the control group, one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s test.

Full size image

Discussion

In the present study, we provided evidence, for the first time, that acute oral administration of MAK (a functional food derived from G. lucidum mycelia) exerts a significant antidepressant-like effect in rats, and that this effect can be observed in the forced swimming test. The forced swimming test is the most widely used paradigm for screening potential antidepressants in rodents. A significant correlation between the efficacy and effectiveness of therapy has been demonstrated in the forced swimming test [12]. Various antidepressants, such as TCAs, SSRIs, and SNRIs, have been demonstrated to reduce immobility without altering locomotor activity [18]. The present study showed that MAK significantly reduced immobility in the forced swimming test. Psychostimulants, such as amphetamine and caffeine, also reduce immobility in the forced swimming test with increasing general activity [12], so MAK was evaluated for its effects on locomotor activity in the open-field test to exclude a false-positive effect. At a dose that showed a significant decrease in immobility in the forced swimming test (1 g/kg), MAK did not change locomotor activity. These results suggest that the MAK-induced decrease in immobility in the forced swimming test is caused by an antidepressant-like effect rather than a locomotor-enhancing effect.

To evaluate the anxiety-like effect of MAK, the contextual fear-conditioning test and elevated plus-maze test as memory-dependent and -independent tasks, respectively, were undertaken [19, 20]. In the contextual fear-conditioning test, the MAK (1 g/kg)-treated group showed a significant decrease in freezing behavior compared with the control group. By contrast, MAK did not affect the index of anxiety (% open arm entries and % time spent in open arm) or locomotor activity (closed arm entries) in the elevated plus-maze test. Conditioned fear-induced freezing behavior has been demonstrated to be decreased by representative anxiolytic agents such as benzodiazepines [21] and SSRIs [22]. Similarly, the percentage of time spent in the open arms in the elevated plus-maze test is increased by treatment with clinically effective anxiolytic agents but is decreased by anxiogenic agents [23]. However, the elevated plus-maze test is known to exhibit remarkable variability, and sometimes paradoxical patterns in experimental results using 5-HT-related agents have been obtained [24, 25]. Indeed, the elevated plus-maze test could not detect the anxiolytic-like effects of 5-HT2 receptor antagonists such as ketanserin, mianserin, and MDL-100907 in previous studies [26, 27]. Collectively, the elevated plus-maze test might not have been suitable to assess the anxiolytic effect of MAK, which may possess anxiolytic-like effects toward memory-dependent and/or stress-induced anxiety.

The head-twitch response is defined as a rapid movement of the head and neck. It is a useful index for assessing the effects of drugs on central serotonergic activity in vivo in rodent experiments. The stereotypical behavior is induced by the serotonin precursor 5-HTP via an increase of serotonin levels in the synaptic clefts [28] and the subsequent indirect activation of 5-HT2A receptors [29]. This response has been reported to be enhanced by acute inhibition of 5-HT reuptake by SSRIs [30]. By contrast, DOI, which has an approximately equal affinity for 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B and 5-HT2C receptors, is considered to induce a head-twitch response by a direct agonistic effect on 5-HT2A receptors, because a DOI-induced head-twitch response is blocked by selective 5-HT2A antagonists but not by 5-HT2B/2C antagonists [29, 31] and is not modified by SSRIs [17, 31]. The present study confirmed that the oral administration of the SSRI fluvoxamine (10 mg/kg), which inhibits the 5-HT reuptake and increases extracellular 5-HT concentration in the brain [32], augments the head twitches induced by 5-HTP but does not change those induced by DOI. In contrast, MAK significantly decreased the number of head twitches induced by DOI without altering that induced by 5-HTP. These results suggest that MAK exerts a 5-HT2A receptor inhibitory effect rather than a 5-HT reuptake-inhibitory effect. The results for MAK are similar to those from a previous study that indicated that the antidepressant nefazodone (which is a potent 5-HT2A antagonist with a low affinity for serotonin transporters) significantly attenuated the head twitches induced by DOI but did not affect those induced by 5-HTP [17]. Previous studies have shown that the 5-HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT also attenuates the DOI-induced head twitch response in rats and mice [31]. However, it is unlikely that the effect of MAK involves the 5-HT1A mechanisms, because we observed no serotonin syndrome-like behaviors (such as flat body posture, hind limb abduction, and forepaw treading) that are induced primarily by an agonism at 5-HT1 receptor subtypes [31] in the MAK-treated rats. Studies on the action of G. lucidum on serotonin receptors are lacking, but a recent study focusing on the antipruritic effect of a methanol extract of the fruiting body of G. lucidum showed that the extract inhibits the scratching behavior induced by intradermal administration of serotonin or a 5-HT2 receptor agonist alpha-methyl-5-HT in mice [33]. Taken together, the findings of the present study suggest that the antidepressant-like effect of MAK might be mediated (at least in part) by 5-HT2A receptor inhibition in the brain. On the other hand, the antidepressant mechanism of MAK may also involve the noradrenergic system in addition to the serotonergic system. Future studies will also address the role of the noradrenergic system in the mechanism of action of MAK.

Studies in humans and in animal models of depression have provided evidence that oxidative stress and subsequent inflammatory neurodegenerative responses have an important pathophysiological role in depression [34]. Neuronal cells are known to be especially prone to oxidative damage because of their higher oxygen consumption and inadequate antioxidant defense systems to reactive oxygen species [35]. Several studies have demonstrated lowered antioxidant defenses (such as decreases in the levels of antioxidants and antioxidant enzymes) and increased oxidative stress (such as increased levels of lipid peroxidation and DNA damage) in patients with major depression [34]. Moreover, antidepressant drugs have been demonstrated to ameliorate oxidative disturbances in depressed patients [36] and chronically stressed animals [37]. Previously, we reported that MAK exerts radical-scavenging activity and suppresses lipid peroxidation in a concentration-dependent manner in vitro[38]. Additionally, oral administration of MAK (1 g/kg/day) for 2 weeks has been shown to normalize the augmentation of oxidative stress and antioxidant enzyme (superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase) activities in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat brains [10]. Furthermore, we demonstrated that MAK could prevent ischemia–reperfusion-induced oxidative damage and subsequent inflammatory responses in neuronal cells, and reduce the size of cerebral infarcts in animal models [10, 11]. Therefore, the antioxidant and neuroprotective activities of MAK could contribute (at least in part) to its antidepressant-like effects. However, it is uncertain how such anti-oxidative effects brought about by acute administration of MAK affect the behaviors in the tests we observed in this report.

MAK has a 17-year history of making appreciable contributions to consumers’ health as a safe, functional food. In the past, there was no report suggesting that MAK had potential acute or long-term toxicities in consumers. The safety of MAK has been confirmed by in vitro toxicological evaluation and animal toxicity studies. Additionally, we showed previously that chronic treatment of MAK (1 g/kg for 9 weeks) had no effect on body-weight gain, levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, triglycerides and total cholesterol in the serum, or the histochemistry in the brains, livers and kidneys of healthy mice [38]. Therefore, single administration of 1 g/kg MAK used in the present study is considered to have little or no toxicity. MAK is composed of bagasse and defatted rice bran that is overgrown with G. lucidum mycelia, which is considered to contain various bioactive substances, including triterpenes, polysaccharides and water-soluble lignin. Recently, triterpenes from Bacopa monnieri[39] and Centella asiatica[40] as well as polysaccharides from Panax ginseng[41] were shown to have antidepressant-like effects in animals. Accordingly, MAK may also contain active constituents that exert similar pharmacological effects. Future works need to be conducted to identify the substances that contribute to the antidepressant effects of MAK.

Conclusion

In summary, the present study demonstrated that MAK has antidepressant-like potential, which is most likely as a result of the antagonism of 5-HT2A receptors, and possesses anxiolytic-like effects toward memory-dependent and/or stress-induced anxiety in rats. Hereafter, further chemical and pharmacological analyses of MAK will be conducted to isolate and characterize the active ingredients responsible for these antidepressant-like effects.

Abbreviations

5-HT:

5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin)

5-HTP:

5-hydroxytryptophan

DOI:

(±)-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane hydrochloride

MAK:

A water-soluble extract from the culture medium of Ganoderma lucidum mycelia

SSRIs:

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

SNRIs:

Serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors

TCAs:

Tricyclic antidepressants.

References

  1. 1.

    Charney DS: Monoamine dysfunction and the pathophysiology and treatment of depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998, 59 (Suppl 1): 11-14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Papakostas GI: Tolerability of modern antidepressants. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008, 69 (Suppl E): 8-13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Xu C, Teng J, Chen W, Ge Q, Yang Z, Yu C, Yang Z, Jia W: 20(S)-protopanaxadiol, an active ginseng metabolite, exhibits strong antidepressant-like effects in animal tests. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2010, 34: 1402-1411. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.07.010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Singh GK, Garabadu D, Muruganandam AV, Joshi VK, Krishnamurthy S: Antidepressant activity of Asparagus racemosus in rodent models. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2009, 91: 283-290. 10.1016/j.pbb.2008.07.010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Machado DG, Bettio LEB, Cunha MP, Capra JC, Dalmarco JB, Pizzolatti MG, Rodrigues ALS: Antidepressant-like effect of the extract of Rosmarinus officinalis in mice: involvement of the monoaminergic system. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2009, 33: 642-650. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.03.004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Grundmann OLVY, Kelber O, Butterweck V: Mechanism of St. John’s wort extract (STW3-VI) during chronic restraint stress is mediated by the interrelationship of the immune, oxidative defense, and neuroendocrine system. Neuropharmacology. 2010, 58: 767-773. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.12.014.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sanodiya B, Thakur G, Baghel R, Prasad G, Bisen P: Ganoderma lucidum: a potent pharmacological macrofungus. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2009, 10: 717-742. 10.2174/138920109789978757.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lu H, Uesaka T, Katoh O, Kyo E, Watanabe H: Prevention of the development of preneoplastic lesions, aberrant crypt foci, by a water-soluble extract from cultured medium of Ganoderma lucidum (Rei-shi) mycelia in male F344 rats. Oncol Rep. 2001, 8: 1341-1345.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kubo N, Myojin Y, Shimamoto F, Kashimoto N, Kyo E, Kamiya K, Watanabe H: Protective effects of a water-soluble extract from cultured medium of Ganoderma lucidum (Rei-shi) mycelia and Agaricus blazei murill against X-irradiation in B6C3F1 mice: increased small intestinal crypt survival and prolongation of average time to animal. Int J Mol Med. 2005, 15: 401-416.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Iwata N, Okazaki M, Kasahara C, Kamiuchi S, Suzuki F, Iizuka H, Hibino Y: Protective effects of a water-soluble extract from culture medium of ganoderma lucidum mycelia against neuronal damage after cerebral ischemia/reperfusion in diabetic rats. J Jpn Soc Nutr Food Sci. 2008, 61: 119-127. 10.4327/jsnfs.61.119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Okazaki M, Iwata N, Horiuchi S, Kamiuchi S, Suzuki F, Iizuka H, Hibino Y: Protective effects of a water-soluble extract from culture medium of ganoderma lucidum mycelia against neuronal damage after hypoxia-ischemia in mice. Jpn J Compl Altern Med. 2008, 5: 153-162.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Porsolt RD, Anton G, Blavet N, Jalfre M: Behavioural despair in rats: a new model sensitive to antidepressant treatments. Eur J Pharmacol. 1978, 47: 379-391. 10.1016/0014-2999(78)90118-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Detke MJ, Rickels M, Lucki I: Active behaviors in the rat forced swimming test differentially produced by serotonergic and noradrenergic antidepressants. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1995, 121: 66-72. 10.1007/BF02245592.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Yamaguchi T, Tsujimatsu A, Kumamoto H, Izumi T, Ohmura Y, Yoshida T, Yoshioka M: Anxiolytic effects of yokukansan, a traditional Japanese medicine, via serotonin 5-HT1A receptors on anxiety-related behaviors in rats experienced aversive stress. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 143: 533-539. 10.1016/j.jep.2012.07.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bertoglio LJ, Joca SRL, Guimarães FS: Further evidence that anxiety and memory are regionally dissociated within the hippocampus. Behav Brain Res. 2006, 175: 183-188. 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.08.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Fanselow MS: Conditioned and unconditional components of post-shock freezing. Pavlov J Biol Sci. 1973, 15: 177-182.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Rojas Corrales MO, Gibert Rahola J, Mico JA: Role of atypical opiates in OCD. Experimental approach through the study of 5-HT(2A/C) receptor-mediated behavior. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007, 190: 221-231.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Cryan JF, Valentino RJ, Lucki I: Assessing substrates underlying the behavioral effects of antidepressants using the modified rat forced swimming test. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005, 29: 547-569. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.03.008.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rudy JW, Huff NC, Matus-Amat P: Understanding contextual fear conditioning: insights from a two-process model. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004, 28: 675-685. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.09.004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Carobrez AP, Bertoglio LJ: Ethological and temporal analyses of anxiety-like behavior: the elevated plus-maze model 20 years on. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005, 29: 1193-1205. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.04.017.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Fanselow MS, Helmstetter FJ: Conditional analgesia, defensive freezing, and benzodiazepines. Behav Neurosci. 1988, 102: 233-243.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hashimoto S, Inoue T, Koyama T: Effects of conditioned fear stress on serotonin neurotransmission and freezing behavior in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 1999, 378: 23-30. 10.1016/S0014-2999(99)00441-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Pellow S, Chopin P, File SE, Briley M: Validation of open:closed arm entries in an elevated plus-maze as a measure of anxiety in the rat. J Neurosci Methods. 1985, 14: 149-167. 10.1016/0165-0270(85)90031-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Handley SL, McBlane JW, Critchley MA, Njung EK: Multiple serotonin mechanisms in animal models of anxiety: environmental, emotional and cognitive factors. Behav Brain Res. 1993, 58: 203-210. 10.1016/0166-4328(93)90104-X.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Griebel G, Rodgers RJ, Perrault G, Sanger DJ: Risk assessment behaviour: evaluation of utility in the study of 5-HT-related drugs in the rat elevated plus-maze test. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1997, 57: 817-827. 10.1016/S0091-3057(96)00402-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Griebel G, Perrault G, Sanger DJ: A comparative study of the effects of selective and non-selective 5-HT2 receptor subtype antagonists in rat and mouse models of anxiety. Neuropharmacology. 1997, 36: 793-802. 10.1016/S0028-3908(97)00034-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Nic Dhonnchadha BA, Bourin M, Hascoët M: Anxiolytic-like effects of 5-HT2 ligands on three mouse models of anxiety. Behav Brain Res. 2003, 140: 203-214. 10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00311-X.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Corne SJ, Pickering RW, Warner BT: A method for assessing the effects of drugs on the central actions of 5-hydroxytryptamine. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1963, 20: 106-120. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1963.tb01302.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Schreiber R, Brocco M, Audinot V, Gobert A, Veiga S, Millan MJ: (1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4 iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane)-induced head-twitches in the rat are mediated by 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) 2A receptors: modulation by novel 5-HT2A/2C antagonists, D1 antagonists and 5-HT1A agonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995, 273: 101-112.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Pawłowski L, Melzacka M: Inhibition of head twitch response to quipazine in rats by chronic amitriptyline but not fluvoxamine or citalopram. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1986, 88: 279-284. 10.1007/BF00180825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Canal CE, Morgan D: Head-twitch response in rodents induced by the hallucinogen 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine: a comprehensive history, a re-evaluation of mechanisms, and its utility as a model. Drug Test Anal. 2012, 4: 556-576. 10.1002/dta.1333.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bel N, Artigas F: Fluvoxamine preferentially increases extracellular 5-hydroxytryptamine in the raphe nuclei: an in vivo microdialysis study. Eur J Pharmacol. 1992, 229: 101-103. 10.1016/0014-2999(92)90292-C.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Zhang Q, Andoh T, Konno M, Lee J-B, Hattori M, Kuraishi Y: Inhibitory effect of methanol extract of ganoderma lucidum on acute itch-associated responses in mice. Biol Pharm Bull. 2010, 33: 909-911. 10.1248/bpb.33.909.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Maes M, Galecki P, Chang YS, Berk M: A review on the oxidative and nitrosative stress (O&NS) pathways in major depression and their possible contribution to the (neuro)degenerative processes in that illness. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2011, 35: 676-692. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.05.004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Halliwell B: Oxidative stress and neurodegeneration: where are we now?. J Neurochem. 2006, 97: 1634-1658. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03907.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Bilici M, Efe H, Köroğlu MA, Uydu HA, Bekaroğlu M, Değer O: Antioxidative enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in major depression: alterations by antidepressant treatments. J Affect Disord. 2001, 64: 43-51. 10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00199-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zafir A, Ara A, Banu N: Invivo antioxidant status: a putative target of antidepressant action. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2009, 33: 220-228. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.11.010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Okazaki M, Tanaka A, Hatta Y, Kawahara Y, Kamiuchi S, Iwata N, Asano S, Suzuki F, Iizuka H, Hibino Y: Antioxidant properties of a water-soluble extract from culture medium of ganoderma lucidum (Rei-shi) mycelia and antidiabetic effects in streptozotocin-treated mice. Jpn J Compl Altern Med. 2008, 5: 209-218.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zhou Y, Shen Y-H, Zhang C, Su J, Liu R-H, Zhang W-D: Triterpene saponins from Bacopa monnieri and their antidepressant effects in two mice models. J Nat Prod. 2007, 70: 652-655. 10.1021/np060470s.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Liang X, Yan Ni H, Si Wei C, Wen Juan W, Xu N, Cui S, Liu XH, Zhang H, Yue Nan L, Liu S, Yang M, Dong Y: Antidepressant-like effect of asiaticoside in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2008, 89: 444-449. 10.1016/j.pbb.2008.01.020.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Wang J, Flaisher-Grinberg S, Li S, Liu H, Sun L, Zhou Y, Einat H: Antidepressant-like effects of the active acidic polysaccharide portion of ginseng in mice. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 132: 65-69. 10.1016/j.jep.2010.07.042.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/13/370/prepub

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Josai University, 1-1 Keyakidai, Sakado, Saitama, 350-0295, Japan

    Hirokazu Matsuzaki, Yuta Shimizu & Mari Okazaki

  2. Laboratory of Immunobiochemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Josai University, 1-1 Keyakidai, Sakado, Saitama, 50-0295, Japan

    Naohiro Iwata, Shinya Kamiuchi & Yasuhide Hibino

  3. Noda Shokukin-kogyo Co. Ltd., 295 Nanakodai, Noda, Chiba, 278-0051, Japan

    Fumiko Suzuki & Hiroshi Iizuka

Authors
  1. Hirokazu Matsuzaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuta Shimizu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Naohiro Iwata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shinya Kamiuchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fumiko Suzuki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hiroshi Iizuka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yasuhide Hibino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mari Okazaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mari Okazaki.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

MO and YH conceived the project and supervised the study. HM designed the experimental protocol, carried out the behavioral tests with YS, analyzed the data, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. NI and SK helped to develop the protocol and analyze the data. FS and HI prepared a water-soluble extract from the culture medium of Ganoderma lucidum mycelia. MO evaluated the results and wrote the final draft of this manuscript. All of the authors have approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matsuzaki, H., Shimizu, Y., Iwata, N. et al. Antidepressant-like effects of a water-soluble extract from the culture medium of Ganoderma lucidum mycelia in rats. BMC Complement Altern Med 13, 370 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-13-370

Download citation

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • Depression
  • Ganoderma lucidum mycelia
  • Locomotion
  • Memory
  • 5-HT2A receptors

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies

ISSN: 2662-7671

Contact us