Skip to main content
Download PDF

In-vitro evaluation of selected Egyptian traditional herbal medicines for treatment of alzheimer disease

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine volume 13, Article number: 121 (2013) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Egyptians recognized the healing power of herbs and used them in their medicinal formulations. Nowadays, “Attarin” drug shops and the public use mainly the Unani medicinal system for treatment of their health problems including improvement of memory and old age related diseases. Numerous medicinal plants have been described in old literature of Arabic traditional medicine for treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (or to strengthen memory).

Methods

In this study, some of these plants were evaluated against three different preliminary bioassays related to AD to explore the possible way of their bio-interaction. Twenty three selected plants were extracted with methanol and screened in vitro against acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and cycloxygenase-1 (COX-1) enzymes. In addition, anti-oxidant activity using DPPH was determined.

Results

Of the tested plant extracts; Adhatoda vasica and Peganum harmala showed inhibitory effect on AChE at IC50 294 μg/ml and 68 μg/ml respectively. Moreover, A. vasica interacted reversibly with the enzyme while P. harmala showed irreversible inhibition. Ferula assafoetida (IC50 3.2 μg/ml), Syzygium aromaticum (34.9 μg/ml) and Zingiber officinalis (33.6 μg/ml) showed activity against COX-1 enzyme. Potent radical scavenging activity was demonstrated by three plant extracts Terminalia chebula (EC50 2.2 μg/ml), T. arjuna (3.1 μg/ml) and Emblica officinalis (6.3 μg/ml).

Conclusion

Interestingly, differential results have been obtained which indicate the variability of the mode of actions for the selected plants. Additionally, the reversible interaction of A. vasica against AChE and the potent activity of F. assafoetida against COX-1 make them effective, new and promising agents for treatment of AD in the future, either as total extracts or their single bioactive constituents.

Peer Review reports

Background

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by a progressive decline of memory and cognition. Amyloid-β (Ab), neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) and synaptic loss; particularly, the deficiency of acetylcholine (ACh) and the degeneration of cholinergic neurons in the cortex and hippocampus, nucleus basalis of Meynert, are the hallmarks of AD [1, 2]. A loss of ACh is considered to play a vital role in the learning and memory deterioration of AD patients. Acetylcholine is an organic molecule liberated at nerve endings as a neurotransmitter. It is produced by the synthetic enzyme choline acetyltransferase which uses acetyl coenzyme-A and choline as substrates for the formation of acetylcholine in specific cells known as cholinergic neurons. Neurotransmitter disturbances and insufficient cholinergic functions are identified among the pathological features in central nervous system disorders [3].

Because of the complication of ACh deficiency in AD patients, elevating ACh level is an essential target for treatment. There are many strategies that can be used to enhance ACh level such as using ACh precursor (choline) [4], muscarinic and nicotinic agonists [5], ACh releasers [6] and AChE inhibitors [7]. However AChE inhibitors have some complications such as toxicity or resistance by increasing AChE expression level [8], but use of AChE inhibitors in AD patients has been the most effective strategy up to date.

Inflammation is a disorder involving localized increase in the number of leukocytes and a variety of complex mediator molecules. Prostaglandins are ubiquitous substances that initiate and modulate cell and tissue responses involved in inflammation. Their biosynthesis has also been implicated in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases, cancer, colonic adenomas and Alzheimer’s disease [9].

Oxidative stress refers to the physiological condition at which the capacity of the endogenous antioxidant system fails to cope with the damaging effects of free radicals. Strong experimental evidences have been established about the oxidative stress theory of AD pathogenesis where oxidative damage plays a major role in neurological degeneration [10].

The ancient Egyptians had a system of medicine that was very advanced for its time and influenced later medical traditions. When the Arabs came to Egypt, Arabic medicine was practiced and the art of healing made use of all available knowledge gained from different civilizations such as the Persian, Chinese, Greek, as well as the Ancient Egyptian. The books written by some famous scholars such as Al-antaki [11], Al-turkimany [12], Ibn Sina [13], and Ibn el-Bitar [14] which represent the main references in herbal shops (known as Attarin), described in their books a number of conditions related to AD and recommended numerous herbal medicine to improve the old ageing problems including AD. In this study we analysed these books and abstracted the information on plants described for the treatment of old age diseases like Alzheimer, joint inflammations …etc.

Currently, a few drugs are available in the market as safe and effective for the treatment of AD. Thus, in this article we evaluated in vitro some Egyptian herbal medicines that have been highly recommended in old Arabic literature for treatment of AD to discover newly potent and safe natural therapeutic agents for treatment of AD.

Methods

Plant materials

Selection of plant species screened in this study was based on their uses in Egyptian traditional medicine (Table 1). Information was gleaned from different sources of old Arabic literature available which are believed to be the main references used in the “Attarin” shops in Cairo. In this study we reviewed the information given by some scholars like Dawood el Antaki [11], Al-torkmany [12], Ibn Sina [13], and Ibn el-Bitar [14].

Table 1 Egyptian herbal medicines reported for treatment of age- related diseases
Full size table

Plant materials (leaves, roots and seeds) were collected from either their natural habitats or the local market (Table 1). Two plants Boswellia scara (supplied and identified by Dr. A. al_Adawi, Ghadafan Agriculture Research Station, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Sohar, Sultanate of Oman), and Ferula assafoetida (supplied by Dr. M. Ziaratnia, Research Institute of Food Science and Technology, Isfahan, Iran). Voucher specimens (Table 1) were identified by Prof. Ibrahim El-garf, a co-author of this article, and deposited in the Department of Phytochemistry, National Research Centre, Egypt. The collected fresh materials were dried, powdered and extracted by homogenization with methanol (10 ml g−1), using electrical blender and macerated overnight then filtrated, the residues were re-extracted three times with fresh solvent. The filtrates were combined and the solvent removed at 45°C under reduced pressure. The total extracts were kept at ~ −5°C for further use.

The multi-well plate AChE inhibition assay

The AChE inhibitory activity of each extract was tested using 96 well micro-plate assay based on previously published methods [15, 16] with minor modifications. Each extract (25 μl of 10× of final concentrations in DMSO) was dispensed in duplicates onto 96 well micro-plate and mixed with 200 μl of Ellman’s mixture containing 10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8, 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA, fraction V), 1.5 mM acetylthiocholine iodide (ATCI, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and 3 mM 5,5'-dithio-bis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany). The control wells contained the extract vehicle (DMSO) instead of the extract. The reaction was started with the addition of enzyme solution (25 μl, 0.1 U/ml). Autohydrolysis of the substrate was corrected by replacing the enzyme with 25 μl of enzyme buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8, containing 0.1% BSA) in duplicate wells. The enzymatic activity was monitored kinetically at 450 nm every 30 s intervals for 3 min at 30°C (linear reaction). The enzyme rate was calculated from the slope of the curve of absorbance change vs time. As screening strategy, final concentration of 1000 μg/ml from each extract was examined and the average % inhibition was calculated relative to the enzyme rate at the vehicle control wells according to equation 1:

% Inhibition = × mean slopes of the vehicle control − mean slopes of the sample mean slopes of the vehicle control

Equation 1. Calculation of the average % inhibition of different extracts on AChE.

Five serial dilutions were prepared from the extracts that showed more than 50% inhibition to determine the IC50 (extract concentration producing 50% inhibition of AChE activity as generated by non-linear regression analysis). Galanthamine (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) served as positive control.

Determination of the inhibition type of plant extracts on AChE

The type of inhibition of AChE by P. harmala and A. vasica extracts (reversible or irreversible inhibition) was determined by measuring the restored AChE activity by 10 time dilution of plant extract concentration after mixing and incubation of AChE and plant extract. AChE activity was measured after gentle mixing of 110 μl of (100 μl enzyme:10 μl plant extract) with 890 μl of mixture containing 10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8, 0.1% BSA, 1.5 mM ATCI, 3 mM DTNB and 90 μl plant extract. In a separate experiment, the dilution effect of plant extract on AChE activity was measured after gentle mixing 110 μl of (100 μl enzyme:10 μl plant extract) with 890 μl of the same above mixture except that 90 μl plant extract was replaced with 90 μl DMSO (solvent). In reversible inhibition, AChE activity can be restored by dilution of plant extract, while there is no change in AChE activity with dilution of plant extract in irreversible inhibition.

Cyclooxygenase-1 assay

Inhibition of prostaglandin biosynthesis by the plant extracts was investigated using COX-1 assay [17]. Indomethacin was included as a standard. Per cent inhibition of plant extracts was calculated by comparing the amount of radioactivity present in the sample with that in the solvent blank.

Antioxidant activity: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging assay

Plant extracts/compounds were prepared in DMSO as 10× stocks from each test concentration (between 0–100 μg/ml) and briefly sonicated when necessary in an ultrasonic water bath. Plant extracts/compounds producing radical scavenging activities equal to or higher than 50% at 100 μg/ml in a preliminary screen were further tested and EC50 (concentration of the extract/compound producing 50% scavenging of DPPH radicals) determined using non-linear regression analysis of the dose-%AA relationship (Equation 1). Three reference radical scavengers (quercetin, gallic acid and t-butylhydroquinone) were tested in the assay as positive controls. The assay method used in the present study was based on a modified procedure [18] which is based essentially on previously published literature [19]. The plant extract/compound stock solutions (20 μl/well) were dispensed in duplicates onto 96-well plates (flat-bottomed, Greiner bio one, Belgium). The assay was started with the addition of DPPH reagent (0.004% wt/v in methanol, 180 μl/well). Appropriate blanks were prepared using the solvent only in addition to the same amount of DPPH reagent to get rid of any inherent solvent activity. Negative controls were also run in parallel to correct for any non-DPPH absorbance by coloured extracts at the test wavelength. The plate was immediately shaken for 30 seconds and incubated in the dark for 30 minutes at room temperature. The remaining DPPH was measured in the microplate reader at 540 nm. The percentage of antioxidant activity (%AA) was calculated according to equation 2:

% Antioxidant activity DPPH %AA = 100 × OD 540 blank − OD 540 sample OD 540 blank

Equation 2. Calculation of the % AA for DPPH assay. OD540 (blank) and OD540 (sample) are the averages of duplicate determinations of the corrected readings of blank and sample at 540 nm, respectively.

Results

The plants (Table 1) were selected based on their traditional uses for treatment of AD or age related diseases except for A. vasica which was selected on the basis of chemotaxonomy. The plants were collected from their natural habitats or from the “Attarin” or the herb shops. A small portion of plant parts (100 g) were extracted and tested in different in-vitro bioassays related to AD. The medicinal uses of the listed plants (Table 1) were discussed in detail by numerous scholars as Ibn Sina “Avicenna”, Ibn El Beitar, El Baironi, Al Antaki, Al Mo’tamed [11–14, 20].

The inhibition effect of the methanolic extracts from the 23 different extracts on AChE activity was screened (Table 2, Figure 1). The screening was performed at a concentration of 1000 μg/ml and the activity guidelines of our program only considered the extracts as active if they only inhibited the enzyme more than 50%. The screening showed different effects on AChE activity as shown in Table 2. Extracts from M. officinalis, B. sacra, and Z. officinalis activated AChE more than 45%. Only, two species namely A. vasica and P. harmala inhibited AChE by 86 and 90% respectively (Figure 1). Further testing and analyses of the inhibition of AChE by A. vasica and P. harmala revealed the IC50 values of 294 and 68 μg/ml respectively.

Table 2 Biological activities of Egyptian herbal medicines against different bioassays related to AD
Full size table
Figure 1
figure1

% inhibition of AChE by different plant extracts at 1000 μg/ml. Plant No. on x-axis refers to the corresponding numbered plants in Table 1.

Full size image

The inhibition type of A. vasica and P. harmala was determined by assaying the change in the remaining AChE activity of the mixture of AChE and the plant extract before and after the dilution of the plant extract in the same mixture, while, AChE activity increased 5 fold by 10 times dilution of A. vasica, the same dilution of P. harmala did not show any effect on the remaining activity of AChE after dilution. This result indicates that AChE is inhibited reversibly by A. vasica and irreversibly by P. harmala.

Screening of the extracts against COX-1 enzyme at 100 μg/ml showed that six extracts demonstrated more than 50% inhibition (Table 2). The IC50 of the active extract showed potent inhibitory activity for F. assafoetida (IC50 3.2 μg/ml) and moderate activity for Z. officinalis (33.6 μg/ml).

Table 2 shows the anti-oxidant results of the tested plant extracts, three of them; T. chebula (EC50 2.2 μg/ml), T. arjuna (3.1 μg/ml) and E. officinalis (6.3 μg/ml) were particularly strong antioxidants when compared to the reference radical scavengers (t-BHQ, gallic acid and quercetin) recording EC50’s < 10 μg/ml. Five species showed the activity at EC50’s of 10–30 μg/ml; these were R. palmatum (EC50 14.2 μg/ml), S. aromaticum (15.9 μg/ml), R. officinalis (19.4 μg/ml), S. tribula (20.7 μg/ml) and A. pyrethrum (26.3 μg/ml). Another four species R. graveolens, N. oleander, C. fistula and T. polium showed the activity at EC50 of 30–100 μg/ml. The rest of the examined plant species either showed weak activity or were inactive at 100 μg/ml.

Discussion

Ancient Egyptians were familiar with drug preparation from plants and herbs such as cumin, fennel, caraway, aloe, safflower, pomegranates, and castor and linseed oils [21]. However, nowadays, the majority of the herbal medicine information is coming from Unani medicine, some of the plant still originated from pharaonic era, and still used for treatment of different diseases like Boswellia sp., aloe, and mustard.

The deficiency of ACh is one of characteristics of AD and responsible for most of the AD symptoms such as decline of memory and cognition of the AD’s patients. AChE inhibitors such as tacrine, donepezil, rivastigmine, and galanthamine are effective anti-AD drugs in the market [22]. The side effects of anti-AChE drugs such as toxicity, tolerability, and loss of efficiency stimulates the researchers to screen alternative natural anti-AD drugs for medication switch [23].

In the present work, the selected extracts were screened for AChE inhibition. Only A. vasica and P. harmala showed inhibitory activity against AChE with IC50 value 294 and 68 μg/ml, respectively. Both plants contain β-carboline alkaloids, which demonstrated potent activity against AChE [24]. Extracts from natural resources usually containing un-determined number of secondary metabolites and expected to play different role upon their interaction with human biological system. In this study the major biological activity demonstrated by both extracts could be attributed to the dominant major constituents in each extracts which should be able to go through blood brain barrier and interact with the active sites. The major constituent of P. harmala is harmaline and A. vescia contains vasicine (from 0.0541 to 1.105%). Generally β-carbolines are a large group of natural indole alkaloids that are widely distributed in nature. They possess diverse pharmacological activities such as sedative, hypnotic, anxiolytic, anticonvulsant, antitumor, antithrombotic, antiparasitic, antimicrobial, as well as antiviral activities [24]. Harmaline, the major active constituent of P. harmala is a common dihydro β-carboline type, it possess interesting pharmacological activities and can interact with several enzymes and neurotransmittors including topoisomerase I, and monoamine oxidase-A [25, 26]. The different activities demonstrated by both major compounds could explain the difference in relative potential IC50 values of both plants. Although, P. harmala has been used in traditional medicine, there are reports of severe intoxication in cattle, donkeys, sheep and horses [27]. Digestive and nervous syndromes have been reported in animals that consume a sub-lethal amount of the plant. Harmaline and harmine are toxic alkaloids characterized in the seeds of P. harmala. Harmaline is almost twice as toxic as harmine and in moderate doses cause tremors and clonic convulsions, but with no increase in spinal reflex excitability [28]. A vasica showed safety when intragastrically administrated at 2.5 g/kg, clinical trials performed on combination preparations containing A. vasica showed no serious adverse effects [29].

Although IC50 value of P. harmala is about four times higher than that of A. vasica, the inhibition type study showed that A. vasica reversibly inhibits AChE and can be used for AD’s medication rather than P. harmala which inhibits irreversibly AChE. This recommendation was supported by the toxicity reports in literature which indicated the higher safety margin of A. vasica as compared to P. harmala.

According to the best of our knowledge this is the first report about the reversible anti-chloinsterase interaction of A vasica extracts growing in Egypt, which add new value and activity to this important plant.

Anti-inflammatory COX-inhibiting NSAIDs have received increased attention in experimental and therapeutic trials for Alzheimer’s disease. Interestingly, COX-1-expressing microglia surrounds amyloid plaques. There is no evidence that COX-1 expression in microglia is changed in AD brain. However, accumulation of COX-1-expressing microglia in AD could result in local increase in prostaglandin synthesis and oxidative stress. F. assafeotida demonstrated potent inhibitory activity against COX-1 enzyme. Asafoetida used in traditional medicine to improve memory and as an antihelminthic, antispasmodic and antibacterial agent [11–14]. Z. officinalis showed potent inhibitory activity against COX-1 enzyme, and also, demonstrated high radical scavenging properties, which may attributed to their contents of gingerols and shoagols. Further understanding of the role of COX inhibitory activity of herbal medicine in mechanisms leading to AD generation is critical to the future development of NSAID therapy for AD from traditional medicine [30].

Increased oxidative stress causes cell damage in the form of protein, lipid, and DNA oxidations. Elevated ROS levels are also associated with increased deposition of amyloid- and formation of senile plaques, a hallmark of the AD brain. If enhanced ROS exceeds the basal level of cellular protective mechanisms, oxidative damage and cell death will result. Therefore, the plant extracts which demonstrated potent free radical scavenging properties particularly those showed EC50 < 10 μg/ml (T. chebula, T. arjuna and E. officinalis) expected to play a vital role in reducing the oxidative stress and this may explain their use in traditional medicine for improvement of AD and/or ageing related diseases.

Brassica was reported to be used traditionally against many human diseases including AD. It contains potential bioactive phytochemicals. Isothiocyanate derivatives from Brassicaceae increased NGF-induced neurite elongation by ~ 70%. It’s also induced sustained production of β-tubulin in the presence of NGF enhancers [31]. Plant sterols including brassicasterol are solely dietary-derivable sterols that are structurally very similar to cholesterol and can cross the blood–brain barrier and accumulate within mammalian brain and may play an important role in protection against AD [32]. Sinapic acid showed anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective activities, the mechanism of action involve amelioration of Aβ(1–42) protein-related pathology including neuronal cell death and cognitive dysfunction [33]. Sinapine is another compound which is widely spread in Brasicaceae, significantly inhibited AChE activity on cerebral homogenate (IC50 3.66 μmol/L-1) [34].

Cassia fistula native to southern Asia, and widely distributed in Egypt as an ornamental tree. The seeds from the fruit are well known in Unani traditional medicine and widely used for medicinal purposes. It was described as safe and efficient purgative even for pregnant women and for children. Recently, the effects of the seed extracts against ageing diseases have been documented. The ethanolic extract of the seeds of C. obtusifolia (synonym C. fistula) (COE), significantly attenuates memory impairment induced by scopolamine via acetylcholinesterase inhibition [35]. COE attenuated secondary Ca2+ dysregulation induced by NMDA (700 μM), while a pre-application of COE reduced NMDA-induced cell death. Furthermore, COE was neuroprotective against the mitochondrial toxin 3-NP (1 mM) [36]. Some of the isolated compounds were shown to inhibit the activities of β-secretase and enhance the memory in the animals with scopolamine-induced memory loss [37].

Emblica officinalis (Amla) grows in tropical and subtropical parts of East Asia, and was cultivated in Egypt in the last few years for its economic value. In traditional medicine, E. officinalis is used for various conditions like diarrhea, jaundice, inflammation, cerebral insufficiency and mental disorders [38]. It is used as a tonic for heart and brain in Unani medicine. The extract demonstrated various pharmacological activities. Amla churna (powdered dry fruit of amla) has also been reported to produce a dose-dependent improvement in memory scores of young and aged rats [39, 40]. E. officinalis extract has an ability to improve or ameliorate spatial long-term memory and short-term memory attributable to mechanisms like antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, AChE inhibitory, hypolipidemic and neuroprotective activities [41].

Nerium oleander (oleander) belongs to the family Apocynaceae. It is widely cultivated as a garden plant, which showed interesting anticancer activity. Unani system recommended the topical uses of the plant more than the internal use, which should be administrated under supervision and with caution. The anti-ageing properties of the plant extract was documented recently, the polysaccharides isolated from the flowers of oleander showed potential neuroprotective activity against neuronal death in Alzheimer’s disease and the neuroprotective mechanism may primarily rely on inactivation of JNK signaling pathway [42, 43]. Also, cardiac glycoside derivatives are proposed as treatment for Alzheimer’s disease, Huntington’s disease or stroke [44].

Nigella sativa is considered as an adaprogenic herb and is widely used in Egypt and other Arabic countries; it showed no activity in vitro against cholinesterase [45], but in vivo, the fixed oil has demonstrated noticeable spatial cognitive preservation in rats challenged with chronic cerebral hypoperfusion which indicates a promising prospective neuroprotective effect [46].

Ruta graveolens (common rue) is cultivated in many parts of the world; it has been used for centuries as a medical preparation. In Unani system it is used as stimulant, emmenagogue, diuretic, abortefacient, resolvent and brain tonic [47]. Methanolic and hexane extracts of R. graveolens showed potent inhibition of AChE and butyryl cholinesterase (BuChE) in-vitro[48]. Rue contains rutin, which, widely used as a drug to improve blood circulation and expected to contribute for such activities.

Sage is a common name for Salvia species, and highly appreciated over all the world, it is used for treatment of many diseases and also proved to have strong activity against AD, in Egypt S. triloba is called Maramaria and it is used as condiment and tea. The plant has been reported in old Arabic literature to improve the mental power [49, 50].

Black pepper (Piper nigrum) is a flowering vine in the family Piperaceae [51]. The plant has been used effectively for the treatment of AD. Piperine is a major plant alkaloid present in black pepper (Piper nigrum) and long pepper (Piper longum), which are among the most common spices consumed by a large number of people worldwide. This plant is known to possess several pharmacological actions, such as antimicrobial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects [52]. Piperine demonstrated in in vitro studies to protect against oxidative damage by inhibiting or quenching free radicals and ROS, lower lipid peroxidation in vivo and beneficially influence cellular thiol status, antioxidant molecules and antioxidant enzymes in a number of experimental situations of oxidative stress [53].

A recent in vivo work conducted by our group, revealed a significant reduction of the oxidative stress status and amelioration of the neurodegeneration characteristic of Alzheimer’s diseases in rats using P. nigrum and S. triloba. It is noteworthy that S. triloba extract showed more interest in improvement of AD in rats [54].

Terminalia species belong to the family combretaceae. They are extensively used in Unani, Ayurveda and homeopathic medicine. T. chebula is a popular traditional medicine in many countries including Egypt. It has a wide spectrum of pharmacological activities and reported as antioxidant, antidiabetic, antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal …etc. According to Unani medicine, emulsifying of one fruit every day prevents ageing and keeps the person very healthy. Recent literature supported the anti-ageing properties of Terminalia species. Phenolic constituents from T. chebula showed strong AChE and BChE inhibitory activities, and antioxidant activity [55]. T. chebula has been recommended for old age diseases [56]. Oral administration of different doses of aqueous extract of T. arjuna causes significant elevation in activities of catalase, superoxide dismutase and glutathione S transferase. Also, T. arjuna is found to down regulate anaerobic metabolites by inhibiting the activity of lactate dehydrogenase in lymphoma bearing mice. The strong antioxidant action of aqueous extract of T. arjuna may play a role in treatment of age-related diseases such as cancer and coronary heart disease and neurodegenerative disorders [57].

The examined biological properties; anti-AChE, anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory of the selected species revealed a diversity of the active species suggesting a different mechanisms. Additionally, animal based in vivo research during the last ten years revealed interesting activities for the majority of the plants listed in Table 1 as discussed above, which, justify their use in traditional medicine to improve memory or treatment of ageing diseases including AD by traditional practitioner overall the world including Egypt.

Conclusion

The reputed medicinal properties of plants have been documented for centuries in different cultures including Egypt, and there are many plant species that have been traditionally used for memory disorders as listed in Table 1. Different results have been obtained which indicate the variability of the mode of actions for the selected plants. Additionally, the reversible interaction of A. vasica against AChE and the potent activity F. assafoetida against COX-1 making them effective, new and promising agents for treatment of AD in the future, either as total extracts or their single bioactive constituents.

References

  1. 1.

    Terry RD, Masliah E, Salmon DP, Butters N, DeTeresa R, Hill R, Hansen LA, Katzman R: Physical basis of cognitive alterations in Alzheimer’s disease: synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol. 1991, 30 (4): 572-580. 10.1002/ana.410300410.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Roberson MR, Harrell LE: Cholinergic activity and amyloid precursor protein metabolism. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1997, 25 (1): 50-69. 10.1016/S0165-0173(97)00016-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Greenblatt HM, Kryger G, Lewis T, Silman I, Sussman JL: Structure of acetylcholinesterase complexed with (−)-galanthamine at 2.3 A resolution. FEBS Lett. 1999, 463 (3): 321-326. 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)01637-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Dolmella A, Bandoli G, Nicolini M: Alzheimer’s disease: a pharmacological challenge. Adv Drug Res. 1994, 25: 203-294.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Greenlee W, Clader J, Asberom T, McCombie S, Ford J, Guzik H, Kozlowski J, Li S, Liu C, Lowe D: Muscarinic agonists and antagonists in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Farmaco. 2001, 56 (4): 247-250. 10.1016/S0014-827X(01)01102-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wesseling H, Agoston S, Van Dam GB, Pasma J, DeWit DJ, Havinga H: Effects of 4-aminopyridine in elderly patients with Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 1984, 310 (15): 988-989.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Villarroya M, Garcia AG, Marco JL: New classes of AChE inhibitors with additional pharmacological effects of interest for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Pharm Design. 2004, 10 (25): 3177-3184. 10.2174/1381612043383368.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Darreh-Shori T, Soininen H: Effects of cholinesterase inhibitors on the activities and protein levels of cholinesterases in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a review of recent clinical studies. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2010, 7 (1): 67-73. 10.2174/156720510790274455.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lipsky PE: The clinical potential of cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitors. Am J Med. 1999, 106 (5B): 51S-57S.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mariani E, Polidori MC, Cherubini A, Mecocci P: Oxidative stress in brain aging, neurodegenerative and vascular diseases: an overview. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2005, 827 (1): 65-75. 10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.04.023.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Al-Antaki D: TadhkiratUla li-'Lbabwa 'l-Jami'al-'Ujab al-'Ujab. 1935, Cairo: Bulaq

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Al-Turkimany JOA: AlMoi'tamad Fil a-'dweah Almofradah (The source of the single Pharmaceuticals). Revised by AlSaka M. 1993, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar AlKalam Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Avicenna AH: Al-Kanoon Fi Altib (The Rules of Medicine). 1993, Beirut, Lebanon: IzAldin Publications, 1037-

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ibn AlBitar DAM: AlJame Li-Mofradat al Adwiyah wal Aghthiyah. The collection of Medical and Food Items. 1874, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Sader Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ellman GL, Courtney KD, Andres V, Feather-Stone RM: A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol. 1961, 7: 88-95. 10.1016/0006-2952(61)90145-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lee JH, Lee KT, Yang JH, Baek NI, Kim DK: Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors from the twigs of Vaccinium oldhami Miquel. Arch Pharm Res. 2004, 27 (1): 53-56. 10.1007/BF02980046.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Jager AK, Hutchings A, van Staden J: Screening of Zulu medicinal plants for prostaglandin-synthesis inhibitors. J Ethnopharmacol. 1996, 52 (2): 95-100. 10.1016/0378-8741(96)01395-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hamed A: Investigation of multiple cytoprotective actions of some individual phytochemicals and plant extracts. 2009, United Kingdom: The University of Nottingham

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Nara K, Miyoshi T, Honma T, Koga H: Antioxidative activity of bound-form phenolics in potato peel. Biosci Biotech Bioch. 2006, 70 (6): 1489-1491. 10.1271/bbb.50552.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bin Murad I: Research into the history of the medicine and pharmacology of the Arabs. 1991, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar AlGarb AlIslami

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Aboelsoud NH: Herbal medicine in ancient Egypt. J Med Plants Res. 2010, 4: 82-86.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mehta M, Adem A, Sabbagh M: New acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer’s disease. IJAD. 2012, 2012: 728983-

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gauthier S, Emre M, Farlow MR, Bullock R, Grossberg GT, Potkin SG: Strategies for continued successful treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: switching cholinesterase inhibitors. Curr Med Res Opin. 2003, 19 (8): 707-714. 10.1185/030079903125002450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Cao R, Peng W, Wang Z, Xu A: beta-Carboline alkaloids: biochemical and pharmacological functions. Curr Med Chem. 2007, 14 (4): 479-500. 10.2174/092986707779940998.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Herraiz T, González D, Ancín-Azpilicueta C, Arán VJ, Guillén H: β-Carboline alkaloids in Peganum harmala and inhibition of human monoamine oxidase (MAO). Food Chem Toxicol. 2010, 48 (3): 839-845. 10.1016/j.fct.2009.12.019.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sobhani AM, Ebrahimi SA, Mahmoudian M: An in vitro evaluation of human DNA topoisomerase I inhibition by Peganum harmala L. seeds extract and its beta-carboline alkaloids. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2002, 5 (1): 19-23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Bailey ME: Major poisonous plant problems in cattle. Bovine Pract. 1979, 14: 169-175.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Budavari S, Neil MJO: The Merck Index. 1996, New Jersey: CRC Press, 12

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Muller A, Antus S, Bittinger M, Kaas A, Kreher B, Neszmelyi A, Stuppner H, Wagner H: Chemistry and pharmacology of antiasthmatic Galphimia glauca, Adhatoda vasica, and Picrorhiza kurrooa. Planta Med. 1993, 59 (Suppl. A): 586-587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hoozemans JJ, O’Banion MK: The role of COX-1 and COX-2 in Alzheimer’s disease pathology and the therapeutic potentials of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Curr Drug Targets CNS Neurol Disord. 2005, 4 (3): 307-315. 10.2174/1568007054038201.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Uchida K: Japan Patent Kokai. 2006, -016362.2006

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Vanmierlo T, Popp J, Kölsch H, Friedrichs S, Jessen F, Stoffel-Wagner B, Bertsch T, Hartmann T, Maier W, von Bergmann K: The plant sterol brassicasterol as additional CSF biomarker in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2011, 124 (3): 184-192. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01713.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lee HE, Kim DH, Park SJ, Kim JM, Lee YW, Jung JM, Lee CH, Hong JG, Liu X, Cai M: Neuroprotective effect of sinapic acid in a mouse model of amyloid beta(1–42) protein-induced Alzheimer’s disease. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2012, 103 (2): 260-266. 10.1016/j.pbb.2012.08.015.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kim DH, Yoon BH, Kim YW, Lee S, Shin BY, Jung JW, Kim HJ, Lee YS, Choi JS, Kim SY: The seed extract of Cassia obtusifolia ameliorates learning and memory impairments induced by scopolamine or transient cerebral hypoperfusion in mice. J Pharmacol Sci. 2007, 105 (1): 82-93. 10.1254/jphs.FP0061565.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    He L, Li HT, Guo SW, Liu LF, Qiu JB, Li F, Cai BC: Inhibitory effects of sinapine on activity of acetylcholinesterase in cerebral homogenate and blood serum of rats. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2008, 33 (7): 813-815.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Drever BD, Anderson WG, Riedel G, Kim DH, Ryu JH, Choi DY, Platt B: The seed extract of Cassia obtusifolia offers neuroprotection to mouse hippocampal cultures. J Pharmacol Sci. 2008, 107 (4): 380-392. 10.1254/jphs.08034FP.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ryu JH, Kim DH, Kim HS, Choi JS: Republic Korean Patent Kongkae Taeho Kongbo. 2011, -039762.2011

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Anilakumar KR, Nagaraj NS, Santhanam K: Reduction of hexachlorocyclohexane-induced oxidative stress and cytotoxicity in rat liver by Emblica officinalis gaertn. Indian J Exp Biol. 2007, 45 (5): 450-454.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Vasudevan M, Parle M: Effect of Anwala churna (Emblica officinalis GAERTN.): an ayurvedic preparation on memory deficit rats. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2007, 127 (10): 1701-1707. 10.1248/yakushi.127.1701.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Vasudevan M, Parle M: Memory enhancing activity of Anwala churna (Emblica officinalis Gaertn.): an Ayurvedic preparation. Physiol Behav. 2007, 91 (1): 46-54. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.01.016.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Golechha M, Bhatia J, Arya DS: Studies on effects of Emblica officinalis (Amla) on oxidative stress and cholinergic function in scopolamine induced amnesia in mice. J Environ Biol. 2012, 33 (1): 95-100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Yu MS, Wong AY, So KF, Fang JN, Yuen WH, Chang RC: New polysaccharide from Nerium indicum protects neurons via stress kinase signaling pathway. Brain Res. 2007, 1153: 221-230.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Yu M-S, Lai S-W, Lin K-F, Fang J-N, Yuen W-H, Chang R-C: Characterization of polysaccharides from the flowers of Nerium indicum and their neuroprotective effects. Int J Mol Med. 2004, 14 (5): 917-924.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Addington OC, Newman RA: Method of treating neurological conditions with cardiac glycosides. 2011, vol. WO 2011085307 A1 20110714: PCT Int. Appl

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Gholamhoseinian A, Moradi MN, Sharifi-Far F: Screening the methanol extracts of some Iranian plants for acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity. Res Pharm Sci. 2009, 4 (2): 105-112.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Azzubaidi M, Saxena A, Talib N, Ahmed Q, Dogarai B: Protective effect of treatment with black cumin oil on spatial cognitive functions of rats that suffered global cerebrovascular hypoperfusion. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2012, 72 (2): 154-165.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Parray SA, Bhat J-U, Ahmad G, Jahan N, Sofi G, IFS M:Ruta graveolens: from Traditional System of Medicine to Modern Pharmacology: an Overview.Am J Pharm Tech Res. 2012, 2 (2): 239-252.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Wszelaki N, Kuciun A, Kiss AK: Screening of traditional European herbal medicines for acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activity. Acta Pharm. 2010, 60 (1): 119-128.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Tildesley NT, Kennedy DO, Perry EK, Ballard CG, Wesnes KA, Scholey AB: Positive modulation of mood and cognitive performance following administration of acute doses of Salvia lavandulaefolia essential oil to healthy young volunteers. Physiol Behav. 2005, 83 (5): 699-709. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.09.010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Proestos C, Sereli D, Komaitis M: Determination of phenolic compounds in aromatic plants by RP-HPLC and GC-MS. Food Chem. 2006, 95 (1): 44-52. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.12.016.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Quijano-Abril MA, Callejas-Posada R, Miranda-Esquivel DR: reas of endemism and distribution patterns for neotropical Piper species (Piperaceae). J Biogeog. 2006, 33: 1266-1278. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01501.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Selvendiran K, Singh JP, Krishnan KB, Sakthisekaran D: Cytoprotective effect of piperine against benzo[a]pyrene induced lung cancer with reference to lipid peroxidation and antioxidant system in Swiss albino mice. Fitoterapia. 2003, 74 (1–2): 109-115.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Srinivasan K: Black pepper and its pungent principle-piperine: a review of diverse physiological effects. Crit Rev Food Sci. 2007, 47 (8): 735-748. 10.1080/10408390601062054.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Mahdy K, Shaker O, Wafay H, Nassar Y, Hassan H, Hussein A: Effect of some medicinal plant extracts on the oxidative stress status in Alzheimer’s disease induced in rats. Europ Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012, 16: 331-342.

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Sancheti S, Sancheti S, Um B-H, Seo S-Y: 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose: a cholinesterase inhibitor from Terminalia chebula. South Afr J Bot. 2010, 76 (2): 285-288. 10.1016/j.sajb.2009.11.006.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Dua JS, Prasad DN, Tripathi AC, Gupta R: Role of traditional medicine in neuropsychopharmacology. Asian J Pharmaceut Clin Res. 2009, 2 (2): 72-76.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Verma N, Vinayak M: Effect of Terminalia arjuna on antioxidant defense system in cancer. Mol Biol Rep. 2009, 36 (1): 159-164. 10.1007/s11033-008-9279-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/13/121/prepub

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Science and Technology Development Fund (STDF), Egypt (project number 251). The authors are grateful to Dr. A. al_Adawi, Ghadafan Agriculture Research Station, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Sohar, Sultanate of Oman, and Dr. M. Ziaratnia, Research Institute of Food Science and Technology, Isfahan, Iran, for supplying B. sacra and F. assafoetida plant materials.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Phytochemistry, National Research Centre, 13211, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt

    Shereen K Ali, Ahmed R Hamed & Maha M Soltan

  2. Pharmaceutical Research Group, Centre of Excellence for Advanced Sciences, National Research Centre, 13211, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt

    Ahmed R Hamed & Maha M Soltan

  3. Molecular Biology Department, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Division, National Research Centre, 13211, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt

    Usama M Hegazy

  4. Phytomedicine Programme, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, 0110, Pretoria, South Africa

    Esameldin E Elgorashi

  5. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, El-Giza, Egypt

    Ibrahim A El-Garf

  6. Chemistry Department, University of Western Cape, Private Bag X17, Belleville, 7535, South Africa

    Ahmed A Hussein

Authors
  1. Shereen K Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmed R Hamed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maha M Soltan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Usama M Hegazy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Esameldin E Elgorashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ibrahim A El-Garf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ahmed A Hussein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed A Hussein.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Authors’ contributions

SKA and AAH carried out the collection and extraction of plant materials and drafting the manuscript. ARH, MMS, UMH participated in acetylcholinesterase, DPPH, inhibition type bioassays, analysis and interpretation of data and in the drafted the manuscript. EEE performed COX-1 bioassay. IAE-G identified the plant materials. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ali, S.K., Hamed, A.R., Soltan, M.M. et al. In-vitro evaluation of selected Egyptian traditional herbal medicines for treatment of alzheimer disease. BMC Complement Altern Med 13, 121 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-13-121

Download citation

Keywords

  • Egyptian herbal medicine
  • Unani medicine
  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • Anti-acetylcholinesterase
  • Anti-inflammatory
  • Anti-oxidant
  • Adhatoda vasica
  • Ferula assafoetida

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies

ISSN: 2662-7671

Contact us