Skip to main content

Antimalarial efficacy test of the aqueous crude leaf extract of Coriandrum sativum Linn.: an in vivo multiple model experimental study in mice infected with Plasmodium berghei

Abstract

Background

Malaria continues to wreak havoc on the well-being of the community. Resistant parasites are jeopardizing the treatment. This is a wake-up call for better medications. Folk plants are the key starting point for antimalarial drug discovery. After crushing and mixing the leaves of Coriandrum sativum with water, one cup of tea is drunk daily for a duration of three to five days as a remedy for malaria by local folks in Ethiopia. Additionally, in vitro experiments conducted on the plant leaf extract elsewhere have also demonstrated the plant’s malaria parasite inhibitory effect. There has been no pharmacologic research to assert this endowment in animals, though. This experiment was aimed at evaluating the antimalarial efficacy of C. sativum in Plasmodium berghei infected mice.

Methods

The plant's leaf was extracted using maceration with distilled water. The extract was examined for potential acute toxicity. An evaluation of secondary phytoconstituents was done. Standard antimalarial screening models (prophylactic, chemosuppressive, curative tests) were utilized to assess the antiplasmodial effect. In each test, thirty mice were organized into groups of five. To the three categories, the test substance was given at doses of 100, 200 and 400 mg/kg/day before or after the commencement of P. berghei infection. Positive and negative control mice were provided Chloroquine and distilled water, respectively. Rectal temperature, parasitemia, body weight, survival time and packed cell volume were ultimately assessed. Analysis of the data was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences.

Results

No toxicity was manifested in mice. The extract demonstrated a significant inhibition of parasitemia (p < 0.05) in all the models. The inhibition of parasite load was highest with the upper dose in the suppressive test (82.74%) followed by the curative procedure (78.49%). Likewise, inhibition of hypothermia, weight loss hampering, improved survival and protection against hemolysis were elicited by the extract.

Conclusions

The results of our experimental study revealed that the aqueous crude leaf extract of C. sativum exhibits significant antimalarial efficacy in multiple in vivo models involving mice infected with P. berghei. Given this promising therapeutic attribute, in depth investigation on the plant is recommended.

Peer Review reports

Background

Malaria is a devastating blood-born zoonotic protozoal disease that damages the red blood cells of the victims [1, 2]. It is found at the top of dangerous fatal infections caused by the protozoan parasites. The five main plasmodial protozoans responsible for causing malaria include P. Knowlesi, P. malariae, P. vivax, P. falciparum and P. ovate [1]. These protozoan parasites are mainly propagated from human to human through the bite of pregnant Anopheles mosquitoes. Additionally, infections from P. knowlesi could be contracted from monkeys infected with the parasite through transmission by the aforementioned vectors [3, 4]. In rare scenarios, the disease can also be transmitted through blood transfusion and the needles contaminated by the parasite. In all the infection types, the pathologic mechanism behind is the rupture of red blood cells, the release of inflammatory mediators, and toxic chemicals that result in the symptoms of malaria such as shaking chills. The ultimate consequence of this phenomenon is the death of the patient from hypoxia unless appropriate measures are commenced [3, 5, 6].

Despite relentless efforts to contain malaria, the disease continues to persistently endanger the life of inhabitants dwelling in the areas endemic to the disease as well as visitors to these areas [1, 7, 8]. Eighty-four countries of the world are still endemic to the disease, albeit a lot of triumphs have been gained through the planned engagement of the World Health Organization (WHO) and its compassionate partners [9, 10]. The main severely affected regions of the world are the developing countries whereas the developed regions of Europe, North America, Australia, and China contract the infection when they have a journey to the areas endemic to the disease [1, 10, 11]. Once in history, these regions were malaria endemic before they cut it out. The WHO reported recently that the cases and deaths from malaria is escalating from year to year: 2019; 227 million cases, 568, 000 deaths [12], 2020; 241 million cases, 625,000 deaths [13], 2021; 247 million cases, 619, 000 deaths [9], and 2022; 249 million cases, 608,000 deaths [1], each consecutive year, accounting for more than half a million deaths.

About 95% of malaria cases and 96% of deaths is seen within the population residing in sub-Saharan Africa. Every minute, a child under 5 years is put in to death by malaria in this region accounting for about 80% of malaria deaths [1, 9, 14]. In addition, pregnant women living in sub-Saharan Africa are vulnerable to the danger of malaria. 32% of pregnancies (out of 42 million) in this region were affected by malaria according to the WHO malaria report. Maternal anemia, low birth weight, maternal and infant mortality and congenital infection are the adverse consequences encountered from malaria during pregnancy [10, 15, 16]. Lack of infrastructure, scarcity of medicines and preventive tools, mosquitos’ resistance to preventive chemicals, inadequacies of the approved vaccine, and more importantly continued loss of parasite sensitivity to antimalarial drugs contribute to malaria’s damage in this region [1, 10, 17, 18].

Over time, plasmodial protozoan loss of sensitivity to the commonly employed drugs in the management of malaria is imposing a tremendous challenge to contain the disease [19, 20]. Chloroquine (CQ) was once the drug of choice for the management of malaria due to P. falciparum all over the world [21, 22]. Similarly, these parasites were responding to the contemporary Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine combination which was among the recommended treatment regimens. However, due to selection of the resistant plasmodial parasites to these armaments, at present, they lost their gain to mitigate the infection of P. falciparum. Artemisinin group of drugs are the most active antimalarial drugs commenced today against the severe form of plasmodial parasite, P. falciparum [19, 20, 23, 24]. These weapons are the contributions from Chinese folk medicine where Professor Tu Youyou scientifically unveiled the ammo, and rescued the lives of millions of malaria endemic communities. This innovation is recognized as the priceless gift from the Chinese community to the world [25, 26]. Nevertheless, reports from different parts of the world, including the recent report from Ethiopia [27], is alerting us that plasmodial parasites gained resistance traits to this life saving advancement [22, 24, 28, 29].

In response to this wake-up call, thorough scientific investigations on plants with historical background of medicinal value in a community is of paramount importance [30, 31]. Folk plants are the key starting point for antimalarial drug discovery [32] as evidenced by the previous development of medicines such as quinine and artemisinin from cinchona and Artemisia plants, respectively [26, 33, 34]. C. sativum is in a list of plants utilized by the Ethiopian community for traditionally managing malaria [35]. As a consequence, the plant is a candidate for scientific exploration to develop antimalarial medicines with better efficacy and safety profile [36].

C. sativum (Fig. 1) [37] is a herb commonly utilized for seasoning purposes as a spice and is known by the name coriander in English [38]. Different communities assigned varying vernacular names to the plant according to their vicinity, culture and language. For instance, Coriandre in French, Koriander in German, Coriandolo in Italian, kuzbara in Arabic, Dhania in Hindi, Cilantro in Spanish, Pak chee in Thai and Wan-sui in Mandarin Chinese. In Ethiopia, it is known by the name Dimbelal [35]. Taxonomically, C. sativum is grouped under the family Umbelliferae (Apiaceae). The plant is said to have originated in the Mediterranean region. Asia, North America, Europe and other parts of the world then gained the plant through cultivation [39, 40].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Picture of the coriander plant, Coriandrum sativum Linn

Throughout the world, coriander has applications in food and preparations of medicinal value [41, 42]. The leaves, seeds and roots of this culinary plant are edible by virtue of its astonishing flavor and aroma [43]. Linoleic acid, dihydrocoriandrine and coriandrine are components that are responsible for the plant’s attractive scene as a condiment [37, 40]. The use of coriander as part of folk traditional remedies traced back to the early civilizations, around 1550 BC. Each plant part (leaf, seed, root) has been used for ameliorating different varieties of ailments. Previous studies on the plant affirmed its anti-diabetic effect, antioxidant activity, anxiety relief, and analgesic properties [37, 44, 45].

Furthermore, there are well documented plant’s antimicrobial activity including antiprotozoal [46, 47], antifungal, antibacterial [48, 49], antihelminths [50, 51], and larvicidal [52] effects. Current drugs such as Tetracyclines which possess antiprotozoal and antibacterial activity have also antimalarial effect, suggesting plant’s potential antimalarial efficacy [53]. In vitro experimentations conducted on the C. sativum plant leaf extract elsewhere also advocated the plant’s malaria parasite inhibitory effect [54, 55]. In addition, previous in vitro and in vivo investigations done on the other plants in the same family (Umbelliferae, or Apiaceae) showed antimalarial activity[56, 57]. Furthermore, the folk’s use of the plant as antimalarial remedy has also been published. More specifically, in Ethiopian folk medicine, after crushing and mixing the leaves of C. sativum with water, one cup of tea is drunk daily for the duration of three to five days as a remedy for malaria [35]. These all provided an excellent basement for further conduction of the in vivo antimalarial test to assert this arrogated endowment employing experimental animals. This insight being the trigger, the aim of the current experimental work was to evaluate the antimalarial efficacy of C. sativum in mice infected with P. berghie.

Methods

Plant sample collection

The C. sativum leaves were collected from Alle District of Ilubabor Zone, Southwest Ethiopia. The plant sample was appropriately wrapped using newspaper, and then supplied to the Ethiopian National Herbarium which is the body of the College of Natural and Computational Sciences of Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia, in November 2022. Here, the identification of the sample was carried out by the taxonomist (Mr. Melaku Wondafrash), and reference number GH04/2022 was assigned to the specimen. For the sake of an antimalarial pharmacologic experimental assay, the plant material was further collected from the aforementioned site where the community utilizes it as a traditional remedy in malaria-infected individuals.

Extraction procedure

The gathered leaf of the plant was first thoroughly washed using tap water, and then cleaned utilizing gauze to remove any leftover dirt and dust. Then, it was carefully dried at room temperature away from direct sunlight. Afterward, the dried leaf was sliced into pieces with the help of a mortar and pestle producing coarsely powdered material (800mg). Next, the plant's coarsely powdered leaf was extracted using a cold maceration process with distilled water which was conducted at a room temperature (20 -25 C⁰), employing the method of Habte et al. slightly modifying it [58].

As per the method, in the beginning, 400mg of the coarsely powdered leaf of the plant was immersed in 1L of distilled water in an Erlenmeyer flask. After that, the flask was put on the mechanical shaker working at a speed of 120rpm to hasten the extraction phenomenon. The shaker was occasionally operated with on and off times over 72 h of extraction. Following the 3 days process of extraction, the Erlenmeyer flask was removed from the shaker and rested on the table. Then after, the distillate having the water extract of the plant was initially separated from the heavy marc using gauze. Under suction filtration, then, the extract was further subjected to partitioning with the help of Whatman filter paper. To the marc, twice, fresh distilled water was added and the same extraction procedure was repeated.

The other half coarse powder (400mg) was also extracted following the same technique mentioned above. The filtrates from the overall procedure were then combined in a round bottom flask, and concentrated employing a lyophilizer at -50C° (freezing), -10 C° (sublimation), and 10 C° (desorption). Last but not least, the extraction yield (%) was determined, and the concentrated plant extract was kept in a refrigerator at -20 °C. The formula illustrated herein below was employed to calculate the yield [59].

$$Percentage\;extraction\;yield=\frac{weight\;of\;concentrated\;extract}{total\;macerated\;weight\;of\;coarsely\;powdered\;leaf}\ast100$$
(1)

The infecting parasite and employed animals

The mice species known as Swiss albino mice, having a weight range of 25 to 28g, aged between 6 and 8 weeks, were used in the present research work. These mice were obtained from the Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI). The study was conducted in Mattu University, Pharmacy Department laboratory between November and December 2022. For the aim of acclimatization to the environment of actual experimentation, the mice stayed in the laboratory for a week without any investigation done on them. Polypropylene cages were utilized for harboring the laboratory animals. The mice were maintained in a standard room with good airflow and temperature with a twelve-hour light–dark cycle. The animals were fed with a standard animal pellet diet, and water was provided ad libitum.

P. berghei (ANKA strain sensitive to CQ) infected donor mice were obtained from EPHI. Every week, then, the parasites were conserved by successive transmission of blood from plasmodium-infected donor mice to immaculate mice having no pathogen of interest. This passage of the parasites continued until the parasitemia in newly infected donors got optimum, 30–37% [60]. To determine the level of parasitemia reached, 0.5 to 1 mm tip of the tails of the mice were cut using scissors. The microscope was used to find out the level of parasitemia. The blood from the mice reaching the parasitemia level of 30–37% was used for infecting the mice in the efficacy tests in the three models. The animals were euthanized by employing cervical dislocation after getting unconscious with a single intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital anesthesia (60 mg/kg body weight). The experimental theatre employed in this work was following the international guideline for studies utilizing animals, and in accordance with the National Academy of Sciences Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals [61]. In addition, from Pharmacy Department, Research and Technical Review Committee, Mattu University, a letter stating permission of the experimental work, with a reference number ‘Pharm 2019/17’, was obtained.

Animal group designation and dosing

In each model (suppressive, curative, prophylactic), thirty male mice were employed. The mice utilized in each model were divided into five groups containing six mice in separate cages randomly. The first groups of mice were given distilled water (10ml/kg/day) with the help of oral gavage and acted as negative controls. The second, third, and fourth groups received the leaf extract at escalating doses of 100 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg, 400 mg/kg/day respectively by the same route as mentioned for the negative control mice. The last three groups of mice were administered CQ at 10 mg/kg/day by mouth with the aid of oral gavage (positive control group). The test substances and the controls were provided to the mice once daily for four consecutive days. The doses of the extract administrated to the experimental groups were decided based on the acute toxicity investigation findings, and preliminary tests done on the plant leaf extract.

Plant’s safety establishment on acute toxicity

For the purpose of establishment of the plant extract’s safety, the well-accepted international guideline, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) guideline 425, was utilized for determination of the plant’s oral acute toxicity [62]. In accordance with the guideline, at the beginning, a single female mouse was fasted overnight and weighed and provided a dose of extract at 2000mg/kg orally via gavage. Then, the mouse was kept away from food for extra 2 h. Following that, the mouse was under close monitoring for the next 24 h. Due to the absence of signs of toxicity and death, extra four female mice were provided with the same dosage of the plant extract. In a nutshell, the mice were monitored over two weeks for behavioral deviations and physical aberrations including lacrimation, appetite loss, erection of hair, convulsions and tremors, and incidence of deaths.

Screening plant’s malaria ameliorating potential in mice

Early infection model

Evaluating the plant’s antimalarial efficacy in early infection was assessed by employing the four-day suppressive test previously illustrated by Peter et al. [63], and adopted by Habte et al. [64] with a slight adjustment. The procedure begins with sacrificing the donor mice, mentioned in section ‘the infecting parasite and employed animals’, reaching the parasitemia level of 30–37% for infecting the mice in the efficacy test. After the animals were sacrificed with cervical dislocation, cardiac puncture was carried out and the blood was collected into a falcon tube having anticoagulant 2% trisodium citrate. The samples of blood from all participating donor mice were then pooled together in an attempt to minimize the variations. The dilution was made with normal saline. The inoculum was prepared based on parasitemia of the donor mice blood, and red blood cell count of normal mice. Accordingly, a solution of blood containing 5 × 107 infected RBCs per 1 ml of blood was prepared [65, 66].

The mice in each of the five groups for this model, explained in the section titled ‘animal group designation and dosing’ were first coded and marked. These mice were then intraperitoneally inoculated with 0.2 ml of blood having nearly 1 × 107 RBCs infected with P. berghei on day one (D01). Then, after 3 h on the same day (D001) animals were fed with the test and control substances according to their group. Dosing continued on a daily bases for the other three consecutive days; day two (D002) after 24 h, day three (D003) after 48 h and day four (D004) after 72 h. Prior to the administration of substances to the mice, immediately before D001 (at D0) and/or 96 h after D001 (D4), at the end of day four, on day 5, parameters detailed in the upcoming subtitles were measured. The mice were also closely followed up for a month for determination of the days of survival [58, 60, 67].

Assessing the duration of survival of mice and level of parasitemia

To determine the level of parasitemia, blood sample was taken at D4 by cutting off the tip of the tail of each mouse using scissors. Non-greasy frosted slides were used to prepare thin blood films. The slides were stained using freshly prepared10% Giemsa for 15 min. The stain was then washed away with distilled water. After drying out, the slides were then examined with the aid of a compound microscope with the X100 objective. The number of PRBCs out of the total RBCs in the fields of the microscope were counted and utilized to determine the percentage parasitemia (PP). For each mouse in each group, two slides were stained and examined under the microscope. Again, for every slide seen under the microscope, three microscopic fields with estimated 200–500 cells were carefully counted. The following equation was then employed to calculate the PP for each mouse [64, 68, 69].

$$PP=\frac{The\;number\;of\;PRBCs}{The\;total\;RBCs\;in\;the\;fields\;of\;microscope}\times100$$
(2)

Using the hereinafter formula, the mean percentage parasitemia suppression (PPS) was calculated [58, 70]:

$$PPS=\frac{(mean\;PP\;of\;the\;negative\;control-mean\;PP\;of\;the\;experimental\;group)}{mean\;PP\;of\;the\;negative\;control}\times100$$
(3)

Each group’s mean survival time (MST) was decided applying the formula indicated hereunder [70]:

$$MST=\frac{The\;sum\;of\;time\;mice\;survived\;in\;days\;for\;each\;group}{total\;mice\;number\;in\;each\;group}$$
(4)

Mice weight, packed cell volume and temperature deviations from the baseline

The mouse rectal temperature and weight were taken immediately before the commencement of treatment at D0 and just after treatment at D4. After feeding into SPSS, data were checked for completeness and the software was run and the percentage change in mean was computed. In addition, packed cell volume (PCV) was determined for each mouse at a similar time interval mentioned herein for rectal temperature and weight. In an attempt to determine PCV, first, the tip of the mouse tail was cut off using scissors and blood was drawn into microhaematocrit capillary tubes (heparinized). After filling the capillary tubes with blood to 75% of their height, the end facing opposite to the blood collecting opening (dry end) was closed with the sealing clay. After that, the capillary tubes were taken to a micro-hematocrit centrifuge and put in it where the unsealed end faced inside. The machine operated at 11,000 rpm for duration of five minutes. Next, after quitting the rotating centrifuge, the capillary tubes were removed and PCV was determined by applying the following standard formula [65]:

$$PCV=\frac{volume\;of\;RBCs\;in\;centrifuged\;blood}{total\;volume\;of\;centrifuged\;blood}X100$$
(5)

Established infection model

The assessment of the aqueous crude leaf extract of C. sativum plant curative antiplasmodial efficacy in the established infection was carried out following Rane’s test as earlier described by Ryley and Peters, with a few adjustments [71, 72]. First of all, the inoculum was prepared in the same way as illustrated for the four-day suppressive test as indicated under the section ‘early infection model’. Next, the animals (five groups for this model), explained in the section titled ‘animal group designation and dosing’ were coded, marked and intraperitoneally inoculated with 0.2 ml of blood having nearly 1 × 107 RBCs infected with P. berghei on day one (D01). 72 h after, on day 4 (D001), animals were fed with the test and control substances according to their group. Dosing continued on a daily bases for the other three consecutive days; day five (D002) after 96 h, day six (D003) after 120 h and day seven (D004) after 144 h. Prior to administration of substances to the mice, immediately before D001 (at D0) and/or 168 h after D01 (D4), at the end of day seven, on day 8, parameters detailed in the upcoming subtitles were measured. The mice were also closely followed up for a month for determination of the days of survival.

Mice survival time and parasitemia determination

At the end of the seventh day since the start of inoculation of the parasite, at D4, by cutting the apex of the tail of each mouse with scissors, blood was removed and thin blood films were prepared using non-greasy frosted slides. The slides were examined with the aid of microscope as explained under the section entitled ‘early infection model; assessing the duration of survival of mice and level of parasitemia’. Furthermore, PP and PPS were determined by employing Eqs. 2 and 3 mentioned in the text. Mice were followed up for 30 days, and eventually, the mice MST was determined by the formula illustrated in Eq. 4.

Changes in mice packed cell volume, temperature, and weight

On day five, prior to initiation of dosing of animals, PCV, temperature, and weight of each mouse were measured. Additionally, twenty-four hours after the final doses were administered, on the seventh day of inoculation, similar measures were taken. Moreover, PCV was measured according to the formula given in Eq. 4. Data gathered from the mice were then organized and processed in similar way as demonstrated under the section entitled ‘early infection model; mice weight, PCV and temperature deviations from the baseline’.

Chemopreventive model

Evaluation of the C. sativum leaf extract’s antimalarial prophylactic activity against the development of the infection was assessed by employing the repository test previously described by Peters with slight adjustments [66, 69, 73]. At the beginning, the randomly grouped experimental mice, the two control groups and three test groups, as mentioned earlier in this text under the section entitled ‘animal group designation and dosing’ were coded, marked and given the crude plant leaf extract and the negative and positive control substances as per their designation on day one (D001). The animals were daily provided the extract and the control substances for the extra subsequent three days: day two (D002) immediately after 24 h, day three (D003) immediately after 48 h and day four (D004) immediately after 72 h of D001.

Following this, the inoculum was prepared in a similar way as demonstrated in Peter’s four-day suppressive test procedure mentioned under the title ‘the early infection model’. Then, at the end of 96 h, immediately, on day five (D01), the mice were injected intraperitoneally 0.2 ml of blood having nearly 1 × 107 RBCs infected with P. berghei. Further, prior to administration of substances to the mice, immediately before D001 (at D0) and/or 168 h after D001 (D4), at the end of day six, on day 7, parameters detailed in the upcoming subtitles were measured. The mice were also closely followed up for a month for determination of the days of survival.

Mice survival time and parasitemia determination

Counting 168 h from the beginning of dosing the animals with the extract and control substances, at the start of day 7 (D4), scissors were used to cut off the tip of the tail of mice to get blood for investigation to assess the blood level of plasmodial parasites. The same procedure detailed under the section entitled ‘early infection model; assessing the duration of survival of mice and level of parasitemia’ was duplicated for the demonstration of the procedure and determination of percent parasitemia and percent parasitemia suppression. Moreover, PP and PPS were determined by employing Eqs. 2 and 3 mentioned in the text. In addition, mice were monitored for 30 days, and finally, the mice MST was calculated before their sacrifice as described by the formula provided in Eq. 4.

Changes in mice packed cell volume, temperature, and weight

On day five, prior to initiation of the dosing of animals, PCV, temperature, and weight of each mouse were measured. Additionally, twenty-four hours after the final doses were administered, on the seventh day of inoculation, similar measures were taken. Moreover, PCV was measured according to the formula given in Eq. 4. Data gathered from the mice were then organized and processed in a similar way as demonstrated the in the section entitled ‘early infection model; mice weight, PCV and temperature deviations from the baseline’.

Evaluation of secondary phytoconstituents

Standard procedures were followed to establish the secondary phytochemical components of the aqueous leaf extract of C. sativum plant grown in Ethiopia [69, 74, 75]. Moreover, the phytochemicals were examined in qualitative and quantitative tests. Alkaloids, tannins, flavonoids, glycosides, steroids, saponins and terpenoids were among the secondary phytochemicals evaluated in the present study.

Analysis of the experimental data

The data collected in three of the screening models were organized. After fed in to the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) software version 22, then it was analyzed. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey post hoc test analytic step was applied to compare the mean differences. Accordingly, MST, PPS, changes in mean PCV, body weight, and rectal temperature of the mice infected with P. berghei between the extract-treated groups and the controls were compared. In addition, comparison was done among the extract-received groups in each model. Statistical significance level was set at a P-value not equal to or greater than 0.05 with confidence interval of 95%.

Results

Extraction yield

The extraction yield obtained from the aqueous crude leaf extract of C. sativum after macerating 800g of the powdered plant sample was 18.75%. Moreover, the extract’s appearance following the dry freezing concentration procedure was found to be brown-colored powder.

Plant’s safety establishment on acute toxicity

Observation for gross behavioral changes and physical appearances in acute toxicity testing revealed that no obvious symptoms of acute poisoning were elicited by the plant extract. In addition, during the first-day single animal test, and throughout the acute toxicity study follow-up period (two weeks), the death of any of the experimental mice was not seen at the administered dose level of 2000 mg/kg.

Plant’s antiplasmodial efficacy in the four-day suppressive model

Impact on mice blood parasite level

Figure 2 summarizes the C. sativum plant aqueous crude leaf extract’s chemosuppressive activity on the level of blood plasmodium parasites in early infection. All the doses provided to the mice prevented the rise in blood parasite relative to the vehicle. The measure of percentage parasite suppression indicated that higher doses resulted in better plasmodial inhibition activity. The ceiling plasmodial suppression effect (82.74%) was elicited by the 400mg/kg/day of the extract. Despite its highest suppressive effect, this upper dose of the plant leaf extract was inferior to the standard antimalarial drug, CQ, which exterminated the parasite to zero blood level. Furthermore, the differences in halting the blood parasite level among all the doses of the extract, extracts and control groups, and among the control groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Measure of parasite suppressing potential of the aqueous crude leaf extract of C. sativum after infecting mice with P. berghei in the four day suppressive test. Data presentation is in the form of mean ± standard error of the mean (Number of mice included in each of the group = 6). NCM, mice group which received negative control, distilled water, 10ml/kg/day; AEM100, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 100mg/kg/day; AEM200, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 200mg/kg/day; AEM400, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 400mg/kg/day; CQM10, mice group which received positive control, chloroquine base, 10mg/kg/day; a, comparing with NCM; e, comparing with AEM100; i, comparing with AEM200; o, comparing with AEM400; u, comparing with CQM10; πp < 0.05

Influence on the duration of survival of mice

The mice were closely followed for 30 days, and the average days of survival were determined per group as described in Fig. 3. The longest average survival time from the plant extract was 22.5 days, which was observed in the mice group that received the plant extract at the ceiling dose (400mg/kg/day). The ascending doses of the extract exerted longer survival time. Moreover, the mean survival days for mice among the groups is statistically significant (p < 0.05). Mice that received CQ survived 30 days and beyond.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The measure of survival time (days) of mice after infection with P. berghei, and access to different doses of aqueous crude leaf extract of C. sativum in the four day suppressive test. Data presentation is in the form of mean ± standard error of the mean (Number of mice included in each of the group = 6). NCM, mice group which received negative control, distilled water, 10ml/kg/day; AEM100, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 100mg/kg/day; AEM200, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 200 mg/kg/day; AEM400, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 400 mg/kg/day; CQM10, mice group which received positive control, chloroquine base, 10mg/kg/day; v, comparing with NCM; w, comparing with AEM100; x, comparing with AEM200; y, comparing with AEM400; z, comparing with CQM10; ^p < 0.05. The mice were under close monitoring for a total of 30 days

Influence on temperature and weight measures

The aqueous crude leaf extract of the C. sativum plant inhibited the loss of weight occurring due to parasitemia development, and averted the decline in temperature of mice in the four-day antimalarial screening model (Table 1). Furthermore, the mean percentage weight decline was 5.02% with the extract at a dose of 400mg/kg/day whereas it was 12.95% with the placebo. As far as temperature is concerned, the percentage reduction was seen to be 6.65% and 1.16% for the negative control group and those that received the highest dose of the extract respectively. In all cases, however, the weight loss ameliorating effect and resistance to fall in body temperature were found to be the maximum with the standard antimalarial medication employed in this investigation.

Table 1 Body weight and rectal temperature changes of mice infected with P. berghei, and administered the aqueous crude leaf extract of C. sativum in the four day suppressive test

Influence on packed cell volume measure

The plant extract protected the malaria parasite-induced hemolysis of red blood cells in early infection as evidenced from the data described in Fig. 4. Each ascending dose of the C. sativum plant aqueous crude leaf extract inhibited the decline of PCV with the preceding dose being less beneficial. The lowest mean percent decline (0.046%) in PCV from the extract-received group was measured in mice that received the 400mg/kg/day. No mice in the CQ received group showed reduction in PCV measure from the base line. The percentage decline in PCV was compared for all the mice groups relative to the negative control mice and among themselves. In this regard, there was a statistically significant (p < 0.05) difference in halting the hemolysis compared to the control and among all the groups.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The measure of change of packed cell volume of P. berghei infected mice, and access to stepping up doses of aqueous crude leaf extract of C. sativum in the four day suppressive test. Data presentation is in the form of mean ± standard error of the mean (Number of mice included in each of the group = 6). D0, measure on day 0, pre-treatment; D4, measure on day 4, post-treatment. NCM10ml/kg, mice group which received negative control, distilled water, 10ml/kg/day; AEM100mg/kg, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 100mg/kg/day; AEM200mg/kg, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 200mg/kg/day; AEM400mg/kg, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 400mg/kg/day; CQM10mg/kg, mice group which received positive control, chloroquine base, 10mg/kg/day. PCV, packed cell volume. a, comparing with NCM10ml/kg; e, comparing with AEM100mg/kg; i, comparing with AEM200mg/kg; o, comparing with AEM400mg/kg; u, comparing with CQM10mg/kg; πp < 0.05. Indicated in the rectangles is the mean percentage change of PCV between post-treatment and pre-treatment measures

Plant’s antiplasmodial efficacy in the curative model

Impact on mice blood parasite level

The C. sativum plant aqueous crude leaf extract’s chemosuppressive effect on the established plasmodial infection is summarized in Fig. 5. The lower level of protozoal parasite load was seen with the doses of the investigational plant as compared to distilled water. The extract’s highest plasmodial suppressive capability was 78.49% which was observed at the upper dose level (400mg/kg/day). The parasite inhibition was in increasing order from the lowest dose of the plant extract towards the standard drug which completely eradicated the parasite and cured the mice. This escalating effect was also statistically significant (p < 0.05) among all the groups under the study.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Measure of parasite load reverting potential of the aqueous crude leaf extract of C. sativum after infecting mice with P. berghei in the curative test. Data presentation is in the form of mean ± standard error of the mean (Number of mice included in each of the group = 6). NCM, mice group which received negative control, distilled water, 10ml/kg/day; AEM100, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 100mg/kg/day; AEM200, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 200mg/kg/day; AEM400, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 400mg/kg/day; CQM10, mice group which received positive control, chloroquine base, 10mg/kg/day; a, comparing with NCM; e, comparing with AEM100; i, comparing with AEM200; o, comparing with AEM400; u, comparing with CQM10; πp < 0.05

Influence on the duration of survival of mice

Figure 6 summarizes the average days of survival of mice that were first infected with P. berghei, and then provided varying doses of aqueous crude leaf extract of C. sativum in the curative test. The test mice which took the plant extract at the larger doses survived more, and 17 days was the longest MST recorded. In spite of the fact that the mice receiving 400mg/kg/day dosage survived the longest days, the effect was inferior to that of mice in the group which received CQ.

Fig. 6
figure 6

The measure of survival time (days) of mice after infection with P. berghei, and access to different doses of aqueous crude leaf extract of C. sativum in the curative test. Data presentation is in the form of mean ± standard error of the mean (Number of mice included in each of the group = 6). NCM, mice group which received negative control, distilled water, 10ml/kg/day; AEM100, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 100mg/kg/day; AEM200, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 200mg/kg/day; AEM400, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 400mg/kg/day; CQM10, mice group which received positive control, chloroquine base, 10mg/kg/day; v, comparing with NCM; w, comparing with AEM100; x, comparing with AEM200; y, comparing with AEM400; z, comparing with CQM10; ^p < 0.05. The mice were under close monitoring for a total of 30 days

Influence on temperature and weight measures

The malaria parasite triggered hypothermia relieving potential and weight loss ameliorating capacity of the water extract of C. sativum in the curative antimalarial screening model is illustrated herein in Table 2. CQ, the positive control medication employed in this investigation, showed no reduction in the mean weight and temperature of mice. Likewise, the extract at different ascending doses averted both weight loss and hypothermia. Nevertheless, even at the highest dose administered in this experiment, the plant didn’t completely prevent the mean reduction in both of the parameters mentioned here. The highest mean percentage temperature and weight change for the extract were 6.79% and 10.10% at 400 mg/kg/day respectively. Otherwise, the mean percentage change was downward in the mice which received the negative control, weight 10.37% and temperature 6.69%.

Table 2 Body weight and rectal temperature changes of mice infected with P. berghei, and given the aqueous crude leaf extract of C. sativum in the curative test

Influence on packed cell volume measure

In Rane’s test for an established infection, the decline in the PCV from the baseline was observed only in the mice group which received the vehicle for reconstituting the extract (Fig. 7). The highest mean percent change in PCV was found to be 4.67% for the extract-received mice at the administered dose of 400mg/kg/day. The maximum parasite induced hemolysis reversing capability was seen with CQ (9.39%). A comparison of the various doses of the C. sativum plant aqueous crude leaf extract with the vehicle depicted that there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in preventing the loss of red blood cells.

Fig. 7
figure 7

The measure of change of packed cell volume of P. berghei infected mice, and access to stepping up doses of aqueous crude leaf extract of C. sativum in the curative test. Data presentation is in the form of mean ± standard error of the mean (Number of mice included in each of the group = 6). D0, measure on day 0, pre-treatment; D4, measure on day 4, post-treatment. NCM10ml/kg, mice group which received negative control, distilled water, 10ml/kg/day; AEM100mg/kg, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 100mg/kg/day; AEM200mg/kg, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 200mg/kg/day; AEM400mg/kg, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 400 mg/kg/day; CQM10mg/kg, mice group which received positive control, chloroquine base, 10mg/kg/day. PCV, packed cell volume. a, comparing with NCM10ml/kg; e, comparing with AEM100mg/kg; i, comparing with AEM200mg/kg; o, comparing with AEM400mg/kg; u, comparing with CQM10mg/kg; πp < 0.05. Indicated in the rectangles is the mean percentage change of PCV between post-treatment and pre-treatment measures

Plant’s antiplasmodial efficacy in the prophylactic model

Impact on mice blood parasite level

The chemopreventive effect of the aqueous crude leaf extract of the C. sativum plant towards blood plasmodial parasites is presented in Fig. 8. In this prophylactic evaluation of the plant extract, the highest parasite suppressive effect recorded was 50.09% at 400mg/kg/day dosing. The other two doses of the crude extract also produced lower load of the parasites in the blood in comparison to the placebo. Moving from the vehicle through elevating doses of the extract towards CQ, the effect exerted was heightened and the difference in parasitemia suppression was statistically significant at p < 0.05. CQ, the standard medication employed as a positive control and comparator, absolutely prevented the development of parasitemia.

Fig. 8
figure 8

The parasite load of mice given the aqueous crude leaf extract of C. sativum, and then infected with P. berghei in the prophylactic test. Data presentation is in the form of mean ± standard error of the mean (Number of mice included in each of the group = 6). NCM, mice group which received negative control, distilled water, 10 ml/kg/day; AEM100, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 100mg/kg/day; AEM200, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 200mg/kg/day; AEM400, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 400mg/kg/day; CQM10, mice group which received positive control, chloroquine base, 10mg/kg/day; a, comparing with NCM; e, comparing with AEM100; i, comparing with AEM200; o, comparing with AEM400; u, comparing with CQM10; πp < 0.05

Influence on the duration of survival of mice

Figure 9 describes the average survival in days of mice that were first provided increasing doses of aqueous crude leaf extract of C. sativum plant, and then infected with P. berghei in the prophylactic test. The longest average survival time for varying doses of the plant extract was found to be 17 days. Moreover, this effect was recorded for the group of mice that received 400mg/kg/day of the leaf extract. Throughout the monitoring period, 30 days, however, each of the mice which received CQ survived. The survival days for the mice group which received the vehicle were a week or less.

Fig. 9
figure 9

The measure of survival time (days) of mice provided various doses of the aqueous crude leaf extract of C. sativum, and then infected with P. berghei in the prophylactic test. Data presentation is in the form of mean ± standard error of the mean (Number of mice included in each of the group = 6). NCM, mice group which received negative control, distilled water, 10ml/kg/day; AEM100, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 100mg/kg/day; AEM200, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 200mg/kg/day; AEM400, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 400mg/kg/day; CQM10, mice group which received positive control, chloroquine base, 10mg/kg/day; v, comparing with NCM; w, comparing with AEM100; x, comparing with AEM200; y, comparing with AEM400; z, comparing with CQM10; ^p < 0.05. The mice were under close monitoring for a total of 30 days

Influence on temperature and weight measures

Table 3 illustrates the mean change in percentages for weight and temperature of mice that were given differing doses of the aqueous leaf extract of C. sativum and infected with P. berghei in the chemopreventive antimalarial screening model. The plant extract inhibited the loss of weight occurring due to parasitemia development and averted the decline in temperature of the mice. In the negative control group, the percentage decline in temperature and weight were huge and found to be 7.03% and 5.56%, respectively. On the other hand, better improvements in both the parameters were seen with the upper dose of the extract and CQ. The percentage change in weight and temperature for the former was 10.28% and 3.25% in the respective order while it was 14.14% (increase) and 0.94% (decline) for the latter.

Table 3 Body weight and rectal temperature changes of mice provided various doses of the aqueous crude leaf extract of C. sativum, and then infected with P. berghei in the prophylactic test

Influence on packed cell volume measure

The aqueous crude leaf extract of the C. sativum plant prevented the malaria parasite- triggered decline of PCV relative to the vehicle in the chemophylactic antimalarial model (Fig. 10). The maximum mean percentage decline of PCV (10.80%) was measured in the mice group that received the distilled water. On the contrary, the lowest percentage reduction of PCV (2.86%) was recorded in those mice which received the extract at a dosage of 400mg/kg/day. Yet, this improvement in the hematologic profile was inferior to that of CQ where there was no decline in PCV from the base line. Significant difference (p < 0.05) in hematologic improvement was apparent in the comparison of the different doses of the extract and the standard drug with the solvent deployed as control.

Fig. 10
figure 10

The measure of change of packed cell volume of mice provided various doses of the aqueous crude leaf extract of C. sativum and then infected with P. berghei in the prophylactic test. Data presentation is in the form of mean ± standard error of the mean (Number of mice included in each of the group = 6). D0, measure on day 0, pre-treatment; D4, measure on day 4, post-treatment. NCM10ml/kg, mice group which received negative control, distilled water, 10 ml/kg/day; AEM100mg/kg, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 100mg/kg/day; AEM200mg/kg, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 200mg/kg/day; AEM400mg/kg, mice group which received aqueous crude leaf extract, 400mg/kg/day; CQM10mg/kg, mice group which received positive control, chloroquine base, 10mg/kg/day. PCV, packed cell volume. a, comparing with NCM10ml/kg; e, comparing with AEM100mg/kg; i, comparing with AEM200mg/kg; o, comparing with AEM400mg/kg; u, comparing with CQM10mg/kg; πp < 0.05. Indicated in the rectangles is the mean percentage change of PCV between post-treatment and pre-treatment measures

Evaluation of secondary phytoconstituents

The investigation directed at determining the C. sativum plant leaf’s secondary phytochemicals showed that it contained alkaloids, flavonoids, glycosides, saponins and terpenoids. Alkaloids were found to be the most abundant constituents (14.32%). On the contrary, steroids and tannins were not observed (Table 4).

Table 4 Evaluation of the secondary phytochemical composition of the C. sativum plant aqueous crude leaf extract

Discussion

Malaria is extremely endangering the socio-economic and health well-being of the international communities, especially pregnant women and children under 5 years dwelling in the third world [1, 10, 76]. The disease is taking a life of over half a million people each subsequent year. This has been aggravated by the inaccessibility and resistance of the parasite to affordable effective antimalarial medications. Most of the queue of antiplasmodial drugs used to combat the disease had lost their efficacy. For example, CQ was previously effective against all types of malaria parasites, but lost its efficacy against the severe form of malaria parasite P. falciparum, and most cases of P. ovale. Further, there are alarming reports including a recent report from Ethiopia regarding the development of resistance traits by malaria parasites to Artemisinins, the most effective drugs we currently have for the management of severe malaria caused by P. falciparum [3, 4, 27]. Hence, it is reasonable to conduct studies directed toward novel antimalarial drug discovery. Antimalarial drugs including Artemisinins were discovered through a thorough screening of folk medicinal plants. The efficacy study in animal models is the common trend towards the commencement of such investigations on traditional medicinal plants [24, 26, 77].

The common malaria screening models in animals encompass the four-day suppressive test, the curative test and the prophylactic test [65, 78]. The four-day suppressive test assesses the test substances’ antimalarial activity on early infection [64, 68], whereas the curative test is used to evaluate the antiplasmodial effect of the plant extract on established infection [30, 78]. The prophylactic model investigates the extract’s preventive capability against malarial disease development, unlike the former ones which assess the extract’s effect after disease develops and shows its manifestations [66, 72]. An ideal screening test for the evaluation of plant extract in early investigation shall involve multiple models measuring multiple parameters to be reliable. As a consequence, all the three antimalarial screening models with multiple parameters (weight, parasitemia, temperature, survival time, PCV) were employed in the present study.

The method for extraction of the plant, and in vivo Pharmacologic investigation on C. sativum to affirm its antiplasmodial effectiveness is logical. The reason for the in vivo test comes from the previous ethnobotanical survey that supports plant’s folk medicinal value [35]. Moreover, there was evidence that further augmented this traditional endowment, the in vitro chemosuppressive antiplasmodial activity of the herb [54, 55]. Plants with folkloric utilization in the management of the ailment, and in vitro positive inhibitory results, are candidates for tests in animal studies for further scientific approval [59, 60, 79]. The in vitro scientific test itself is not final in affirming the pharmacologic activity of a given herbal extract as it doesn’t consider any possible factors in living body such as the immune system, renal and hepatic enzymatic dispositions, and manipulations including chemical inactivation by endogenous compounds [58, 80]. In other words, in vitro suppressive activity is not a guarantee for the in vivo Pharmacologic effectiveness. The plant was extracted using distilled water to replicate the method employed by the traditional practitioners [35].

Application of the murine malaria model involving P. berghei infection in our study is in line with the standard protocol. Rodents such as mice are conducive animals for in vivo tests as they are mammals like humans to reproduce results and infer to humans. Furthermore, they can produce sufficient samples for investigation in a short period of time [81]. More importantly, previous in vivo Pharmacologic investigations leading to valuable medications employed mice in their practice. P. berghei was employed in our research work instead of human malaria parasites, the main reason being human malaria parasites’ inability to infect mice and lack of genetically modified humanized mice in our setup. Even though the use of realistic human parasites adds value, it is not necessarily indicated. This could be learned from most of the past investigations that utilized rodent malaria parasite P. berghei and led to the discovery of most of the antimalarial drugs, currently active and inactive, including artemisinins and quinine [26, 34].

Furthermore, an investigation on the CQ sensitive P. berghei is sensible because our aim herein the present study is to check for the Pharmacological effectiveness of the plant against malaria. Previous studies that discovered antimalarial drugs followed the same principle and found active compounds important for the resistance strains of the human parasites with better safety profile even if the gain from most of such weapons waned out over years [25, 34]. More importantly, this practice (model) is the already accepted standard [60, 82].

The findings from the four day suppressive, curative and chemoprophylactic tests indicated that the aqueous crude leaf extract of C. sativum is endowed with in vivo antiplasmodial activity in mice infected with P. berghei. Measure of parasitemia is said to be the most reliable indicator parameter for antimalarial efficacy of the plant extract in all the test models [64, 66, 83]. In this regard, the ceiling plasmodial suppression effect (82.74%) was elicited by the 400mg/kg/day of the extract in the four day suppressive test surpassing that of the curative test at the same dose by about 4%. This parasitemia suppressive effect was similar to the investigations conducted on Euclea divinorum [66], Maytenus gracilipes [83], Annona muricata [69],Fadogia ciekowskii, Myrianthus libericus [84],Lophira lanceolate,Vernonia conferta, Protea madiensis [85], and Spondias pinnata [74] in which the suppression was better in the four-day test. On the contrary, the curative test yielded better parasitemia suppression unlike our study in researches done on Eucalyptus camadulensis [86], and Balanites rotundifolia [78]. In the prophylactic evaluation of the plant extract, however, the highest parasite suppressive effect recorded was 50.09% even at 400mg/kg/day dosing. This finding is in line with work on Spondias pinnata [74] where the prophylactic chemosuppression was the least while it contradicts the study done on Piliostigma reticulatum [87] where the plant showed the highest effect in prophylactic test.

Moreover, the plant extract demonstrated a statistically significant inhibition of parasitemia (p < 0.05) relative to the vehicle in all the three models where higher doses resulted in better plasmodial inhibition activity. The maximum parasite suppression capability of our study was also compared with previous works done by different authors on other plants. Accordingly, the parasitemia suppression of the plant under investigation herein is superior to the study done on Terminalia arjuna (67.95%) [30], Spondias pinnata (66.82%) [74], Lobelia giberroa (73.05%) [88], Alstonia boonei (68.35%) [89], Schinus molle (66.91%) [60],,Lagenaria siceraria (77.37% %) [58], Maytenus gracilipes (74.15%) [83], Saccharum officinarum (70.20%) [90], Phyllanthus emblica, Terminalia chebula, Terminalia bellerica (53.40% to 69.46%) [91], Canthium multiflorum (81.90%) [92], Myrianthus libericus (77.11%) [84], Spondias pinnata (66.82%) [74], Vernonia Amygdalina (42.26%) [93] and Balanites rotundifolia (69%) [78]. Nevertheless, the findings of our work on the leaf extract of C. sativum pertaining to parasitemia suppression was nearly equal or inferior to the work done on Artemisia abyssinica (82.4%), [94] Eucalyptus camadulensis (95.30%) [86], Senna alata (84.36%), Capsicum frutescens)(93.28%, Moringa oleifera (95.6%) [95], Avicennia marina(93%) [96] and Ficus thoningii (91%) [97]. None of the studies mentioned in this text including this experimental investigation cleared the parasite unlike the standard antimalarial drug, CQ (100% suppression). The reason for the incomplete eradication of the parasite by the extracts could be short half-life of the active components that would have required frequent dosing. Otherwise, the active ingredient/s in the plants might require further structural modifications to be potent drugs. Metabolic elimination, immune system, or the yet undiscovered mechanism would be involved [60].

According to literature reports, antiplasmodial agent eliciting a level of parasitemia less than/equal to 90% for the negative control, infers that the test substance is active antimalarial candidate in standard antiplasmodial screening procedures. As the values are less than the mentioned cut points, the aqueous leaf extract of C. sativum is considered an active antiplasmodial chemosuppressive agent. In addition, a potential antimalarial candidate should exhibit percentage parasitemia suppression of greater than/equal to 30%. Again, the aqueous extract of C. sativum satisfies this criterion (82.74% suppression), so the plant is a malaria-destroying arsenal. Evidence from literature sources also shows that the percent parasitemia inhibition of ≥ 50% at different dose ranges of the plant extract can be rated for their degree of activity: 500–250 mg/kg/day (moderate), 250–100 mg/kg/day (good), ≤ 100 mg/kg/day (very good). As a result, the leaf extract of C. sativum is endowed with a very good (51.72% at 100 mg/kg/day) malaria-relieving effect [64].

The antiplasmodial effect exerted by the aqueous extract of C. sativum could be due to the abundant phytochemicals localized in the plant. The findings from the secondary phytochemical profiling indicated that the plant contained alkaloids, flavonoids, glycosides, saponins and terpenoids. The terpenoids and flavonoids contained in the plant showed anti-oxidant, free radical scavenging and anti-inflammatory activities according to the studies previously conducted on the plant [98]. These host protective actions could be responsible for the antiplamodial property exerted by the extract. Moreover, the plant is rich in the alkaloid constituents (14.32%). The alkaloids have recorded historical evidence as conventional antimalarial drugs, quinine from cinchona bark being a prototype [99, 100]. These profusely concentrated alkaloidal compounds in the plant leaf could be the major reason for the antiplasmodial efficacy of the extract. Still, the immune system might be boosted by these components to tackle the development of the malaria-causing parasite in the body. Also, inhibition of the pathways in the malaria reproductive cycle in the vertebrates could be the other suggested mechanism for ameliorating malaria parasite- induced harm [6, 58, 82].

In addition to the measure of parasitemia discussed above, PCV, body weight, survival time and temperature were recorded and assessed in each of the models. Inhibition of hypothermia, weight loss hampering, improved survival and protection against hemolysis were elicited by the extract as evidenced from the findings. This is in line with the general consensus that a candidate antimalarial plant extract is expected to halt weight loss, prevent temperature fall, inhibit RBCs hemolysis and extend the survival life of mice under the condition of malaria infection [82, 83, 96, 101]. Comparted to the negative control, extract’s anemia inhibiting effect, degree of resistance to weight loss, and hypothermia were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The inhibition of weight loss and PCV decline exhibited by the extract was dose-dependent where higher doses better counteracted the decline of these parameters. Nonetheless, even the highest dose administered didn’t absolutely produce zero or positive percentage difference in both the parameters. Previous works suggested that recrudesce and short duration of action for the active components resulting from the increased metabolism and elimination could be responsible for this pitfall [64, 66]. Comparing the weight and PCV protection capability of the extract among the three models, it was found that the plant’s percentage inhibition was higher in the four-day suppressive test in line with the parasitemia suppression. This effect is similar to the researches on Vernonia amygdalina [93] and Maytenus gracipiles [83]. On the other hand, the findings on Balanites rotundifolia [78] showed the plant’s pronounced effect on weight and PCV in curative test. In the present study, the lowest percentage inhibition was scored in the chemoprophylactic test. This finding is similar to the research work done on Saccharum officinarum [90].

In the plant’s screening for the antimalarial potential, mice survival time is also among the widely monitored parameters [78, 82]. It is agreed up on that the candidate extract should extend the survival time of mice in comparison to the negative control substance. In accordance with this, in all the three models, the extract was found to prolong the survival time of the test mice better than the negative control mice, which is also statistically significant (p < 0.05). Mice that were administered the extract to assess the effect of the substance in early infection survived more days than those in the curative test, while the short survival days were measured among those in prophylaxis procedure. The effect on the MST is similar to previous research where the survival time is longer in the four day suppressive test [83]. However, in none of the models the mean survival of the mice was reported to be 30 during the monthly monitoring period. This could be attributed to the suboptimal clearance of the parasites from blood due to the above-mentioned reasons in this document. Contrary to this, the MST of mice that received the standard antimalarial drug was greater than or equal to 30 days because of the complete eradication of the blood parasite, plasmodium. Eventually, this measure and the aforementioned parameters indicate that the antiplasmodial effect of the aqueous crude leaf extract of C. sativum was more pronounced on the early and established infection than the prophylaxis test.

The investigation on plant’s safety establishment in acute toxicity study, up on observation for gross behavioral changes and physical appearances, revealed that no obvious symptoms of acute poisoning were elicited by the plant extract. In addition, during the first-day single animal test, and throughout the acute toxicity study follow-up period (two weeks), the death of any of the experimental mice was not seen at the administered dose level of 2000 mg/kg. Hence, the median lethal dose (LD50) of the leaf extract from C. sativum could exceed 2000 mg/kg according to the OECD guideline No 425 [102]. Thus, the safe use of C. sativum by the Ethiopian folk for malaria management is reasonable as supported by these test findings.

Limitation pertaining to the current experimental work

The present study thrived to dig out the antimalarial effect of the crude extract of the plant employing different models and multiple parameters. However, the effect of the plant with different solvents was not explored. Further, the mode of action of the plant extract was not investigated. Identification of specific bioactive compounds responsible for eliciting antimalarial activity was not achieved. Hence, future studies focus on the utilization of state of-the-art technologies for the identification, isolation, characterization and structural elucidation of such invaluable compounds localized in the plant.

Conclusion

The results of our experimental study revealed that the aqueous crude leaf extract of C. sativum exhibits significant antimalarial efficacy in multiple in vivo models involving mice infected with P. berghei. Notably, the extract demonstrated a substantial parasite inhibition of up to 82.74%. Additionally, it effectively mitigated hypothermia, attenuated weight loss, improved survival outcomes, and conferred protection against hemolysis. Given these promising therapeutic attributes, in depth investigation on the plant is recommended.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

One Way Analysis of Variance

CQ:

Chloroquine

EPHI:

Ethiopian Public Health Institute

MST:

Mean Survival Time

OECD:

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development

PCV:

Packed Cell Volume

PP:

Percentage Parasitemia

PPS:

Percentage Parasitemia Suppression

SEM:

Standard Error of the Mean

SPSS:

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. World Health Organization. World Malaria Report. World Health Organization. 2023. p. 238.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nosten F, Richard-Lenoble D, Danis M. A brief history of malaria. Press Medicale. 2022;51(3):104130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cox FE. History of the discovery of the malaria parasites and their vectors. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3(5):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cowman AF, Healer J, Marapana D, Marsh K. Malaria: biology and disease. Cell. 2016;167(3):610–24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.055

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Phillips MA, Burrows JN, Manyando C, Van Huijsduijnen RH, Van Voorhis WC, Wells TNC. Malaria. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2017;3:17050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dans MG, Piirainen H, Nguyen W, Khurana S, Mehra S, Razook Z, et al. Sulfonylpiperazine compounds prevent Plasmodium falciparum invasion of red blood cells through interference with actin-1/profilin dynamics. PLoS Biology. 2023;21:1–34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002066.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rawal D. An overview of natural history of the human malaria. Int J Mosq Res. 2020;7(2):8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Najm M, Heidari A, Dehaghi NK, Sezavar M, Kabir K. Evaluation of Antimalarial Activities of the Hydroalcoholic Extracts of Enteric Evaluation of Antimalarial Activities of the Hydroalcoholic Extracts of Artemisia persica and Artemisia spicigera Against Plasmodium berghei in Albino Mice. Int J Enteric Pathog. 2023;11(3):102–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization. World Malaria Report. World Health Organization. 2022. p. 238.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Parasites-Malaria. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. 2023. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/malaria/index.html

  11. Chen Y, Zhang H, Chen H, Fan L, Xu C, Xu J, et al. Malaria epidemiological characteristics and control in Guangzhou, China, 1950–2022. Malar J. 2023;22(1):1–12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04696-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. World Health Organization. World malaria report: 20 years of global progress and challenges. World Health Organization. 2020. p. 1–4. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/reports/world-malaria-report-2020.

    Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Organization. World Malaria Report. World Health Organization. 2021. p. 322.

    Google Scholar 

  14. UNICEF. UNICEF Data: Monitoring the situation of children and women . UNICEF. 2024. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-health/malaria/

  15. Unger HW, Acharya S, Arnold L, Wu C, van Eijk AM, Gore-Langton GR, et al. The effect and control of malaria in pregnancy and lactating women in the Asia-Pacific region. Lancet Glob Heal. 2023;11(11):1805–18. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00415-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Coulibaly SO, Gies S, D’Alessandro U. Malaria burden among pregnant women living in the rural district of Boromo, Burkina Faso. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77(6):56–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ding XC, Incardona S, Serra-Casas E, Charnaud SC, Slater HC, Domingo GJ, et al. Malaria in pregnancy (MiP) studies assessing the clinical performance of highly sensitive rapid diagnostic tests (HS-RDT) for Plasmodium falciparum detection. Malar J. 2023;22(1):1–15. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04445-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines for malaria. World Health Organization; 2023. p. 447. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/366432/WHO-UCN-GMP-2023.01-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

  19. Price RN, von Seidlein L, Valecha N, Nosten F, Baird JK, White NJ. Global extent of chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(10):982–91. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70855-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hanboonkunupakarn B, White NJ. The threat of antimalarial drug resistance. Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines. 2015;2(1):1–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40794-016-0027-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Njiro BJ, Mutagonda RF, Chamani AT, Mwakyandile T, Sabas D, Bwire GM. Molecular surveillance of chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in sub-Saharan African countries after withdrawal of chloroquine for treatment of uncomplicated malaria: A systematic review. J Infect Public Health. 2022;15(5):550–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2022.03.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. World Health Organization. Strategy to respond to antimalarial drug resistance in Africa. World Health Organization. 2022. 4. Available from: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/malaria/who-antimalarial-drug-resistance-strategy-for-consultation.pdf?sfvrsn=9d4eaa0_6

  23. White NJ. Review series Antimalarial drug resistance. J Clin Invest. 2004;113(8):1084–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang S, Huang F, Yan H, Yin J, Xia Z. A review of malaria molecular markers for drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax in China. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;1:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Su X, Miller H. The discovery of artemisinin and Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Sci China Life Sci. 2016;176(1):100–6.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liu W, Liu Y. Youyou Tu: Significance of winning the 2015 nobel prize in physiology or medicine. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2016;6(1):1–2.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Fola AA, Feleke SM, Mohammed H, Brhane BG, Hennelly CM, Assefa A, et al. Plasmodium falciparum resistant to artemisinin and diagnostics have emerged in Ethiopia. Nat Microbiol. 2023;8(10):1911–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Tarama CW, Soré H, Siribié M, Débé S, Kinda R, Ganou A, et al. Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance-associated mutations in isolates from children living in endemic areas of Burkina Faso. Malar J. 2023;22(1):1–12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04645-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fitri LE, Pawestri AR, Winaris N, Endharti AT, Khotimah ARH, Abidah HY, et al. Antimalarial Drug Resistance: A Brief History of Its Spread in Indonesia. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2023;17:1995–2010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Chaniad P, Techarang T, Phuwajaroanpong A, Plirat W, Viriyavejakul P, Septama AW, et al. Antimalarial efficacy and toxicological assessment of medicinal plant ingredients of Prabchompoothaweep remedy as a candidate for antimalarial drug development. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2023;23(1):1–17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-03835-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Chaniad P, Techarang T, Phuwajaroanpong A, Horata N, Septama AW, Punsawad C. Exploring potential antimalarial candidate from medicinal plants of Kheaw Hom remedy. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022;7(11):368. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7110368.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. World Health Organization. WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy. World Health Organization. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Asnake S, Teklehaymanot T, Hymete A, Erko B, Giday M. Survey of Medicinal Plants Used to Treat Malaria by Sidama People of Boricha District, Sidama Zone, South Region of Ethiopia. Evidence-based Complement Altern Med. 2016;2016:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhou B, Yue JM. Natural products are the treasure pool for antimalarial agents. Natl Sci Rev. 2022;9(11):nwac112.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Gijan M, Dalle G. Ethnobotanical Study of Medicinal Plants in Nagelle Arsi District, West Arsi Zone of Oromia. Ethiopia J Nat Sci Res. 2019;9(13):1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pandey SK, Anand U, Siddiqui WA, Tripathi R. Drug Development Strategies for Malaria: With the Hope for New Antimalarial Drug Discovery—An Update. Adv Med. 2023;2023:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Asgarpanah J. Phytochemistry, pharmacology and medicinal properties of Coriandrum sativum L. African J Pharm Pharmacol. 2012;6(31):2340–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kassahun BM. Unleashing the exploitation of coriander (Coriander sativum L.) for biological, industrial and pharmaceutical applications. Acad Res J Agric Sci Res. 2020;8:552–64. Available from:  http://www.academicresearchjournals.org/ARJASR/Index.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Thakur S, Kumari I, Chaudhary V, M S, Kaurav H, Chaudhary G. Coriander (Coriandrum Sativum): a Common Indian Traditional Spice and Ayurvedic Remedy. Int J Res Ayurveda Pharm. 2021;12(2):74–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bhat S., Kaushal P, Kaur M, Sharma kH. Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.): Processing, nutritional and functional aspects. African J Plant Sci. 2014;8(1):25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Awas G, Mekbib F, Ayana A. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Ethiopian Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Genotypes for Seed Yield and Oil Content. J Exp Agric Int. 2016;14(6):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jeni James J, Meena Devi V. Efficacy of some traditional Indian spices for treating diabetes. Int J Res Eng Sci. 2021;9(3):46–53 http://www.ijres.org.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Asfaw MD. A Review on the Chemical Constituent, Pharmacological and Medicinal Properties of Coriandrum sativum. Nat Prod Chem Res. 2021;9(1000):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Fatima T, Iftikhar F, Hussain SZ. Pharmacological and medical screening of Coriandum sativum. Int J Unani Integr Med. 2018;2(2):43–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kumar D, Chauhan P. Coriandrum sativum : A Multipurpose Medicinal Plant- A Review. 2018;7(15):322–7.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Băieş MH, Cotuţiu VD, Spînu M, Mathe A, Cozma-Petruț A, Miere D, et al. The Effects of Coriandrum sativum L. and Cucurbita pepo L. against Gastrointestinal Parasites in Swine: An In Vivo Study. Microorganisms. 2023;11(5):1230.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Al-Snafi AE. Antiparasitic, antiprotozoal, molluscicidal and insecticidal activity of medicinal plants (part 2) – plant based review. Sch Acad J Pharm. 2016;5(6):194–207.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Ali HAM, Imad HH, Salah AI. Analysis of bioactive chemical components of two medicinal plants (Coriandrum sativum and Melia azedarach) leaves using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). African J Biotechnol. 2015;14(40):2812–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ali SAQ, Malik A. Antimicrobial Activity of Coriander sativum. J Pharm Res Int. 2021;32(47):74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hosseinzadeh S, Ghalesefidi MJ, Azami M, Mohaghegh MA, Hejazi SH, Ghomashlooyan M. In vitro and in vivo anthelmintic activity of seed extract of Coriandrum sativum compared to Niclosamid against Hymenolepis nana infection. J Parasit Dis. 2016;40(4):1307–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-015-0676-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Abou El-Nour MF, Fadladdin Y. Antischistosomal Activity of Zingiber officinale, Piper nigrum, and Coriandrum sativum Aqueous Plant Extracts on Hamster Infected with Schistosoma mansoni. J Parasitol Res. 2021;2021(1):6628787.

    Google Scholar 

  52. MM Sedaghat, A Sanei Dehkordi, MR Abai1, M Khanavi, F Mohtarami, Y Salim Abad1, F Rafi *H Vatandoost. Larvicidal Activity of Essential Oils of Apiaceae Plants against Malaria Vector, Anopheles stephensi MM. J Arthropod-Borne Dis. 2011;5(2):51–9.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Mekonnen LB. In vivo antimalarial activity of the crude root and fruit extracts of Croton macrostachyus (Euphorbiaceae) against Plasmodium berghei in mice. J Tradit Complement Med. 2015;5(3):168–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Sathiyamoorthy P, Lugasi-Evgi H, Schlesinger P, Kedar I, Gopas J, Pollack Y, et al. Screening for cytotoxic and antimalarial activities in desert plants of the Negev and Bedouin market plant products. Pharm Biol. 1999;37(3):188–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ruiz L, Ruiz L, MacO M, Cobos M, Gutierrez-Choquevilca AL, Roumy V. Plants used by native Amazonian groups from the Nanay River (Peru) for the treatment of malaria. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;133(2):917–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Wang P. Phytochemical constituents and pharmacological activities of Eryngium L. (Apiaceae). Pharm Crop. 2012;3(1):99–120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Ural IO, Kayalar H, Durmuskahya C, Cavus I, Ozbilgin A. In vivo antimalarial activity of methanol and water extracts of Eryngium thorifolium boiss (apiaceae family) against P. berghei in infected mice. Trop J Pharm Res. 2014;13(8):1313–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Habte G, Tamiru S, Eyasu K. In vivo antimalarial activity of the 80% methanolic crude fruit extract of Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl against Plasmodium berghei infected mice. Heliyon. 2023;9(4):e15453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Essoh AP, Cassiano GC, Mandim F, Barros L, Gomes I, Medeiros MM, et al. Antimalarial and Cytotoxic Activity of Native Plants Used in Cabo Verde Traditional Medicine. Plants. 2023;12(4):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Habte G, Nedi T, Assefa S. Antimalarial Activity of Aqueous and 80% Methanol Crude Seed Extracts and Solvent Fractions of Schinus molle Linnaeus (Anacardiaceae) in Plasmodium berghei -Infected Mice. J Trop Med. 2020;2020:9473250.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. National Academy of Sciences. National Academy of Sciences Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. 8th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  62. OECD. OECD Guideline 425: Acute Oral Toxicity—up-and-down Procedure. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Peters W, Portus JH, Robinson BL. The chemotherapy of rodent malaria. XXII Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1975;69(2):155–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Habte G, Assefa S. In Vivo Antimalarial Activity of Crude Fruit Extract of Capsicum frutescens Var Minima (Solanaceae) against Plasmodium berghei -Infected Mice. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:1320952.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Ayalew M, Bekele A. Evaluation of the Antimalarial Activity of Crude Extract of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. Evidence-based Complement Altern Med Leaf against Plasmodium berghei in Mice. 2021;2021:7068999.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Girmaw F, Engidawork E. In Vivo Anti-Malarial Activity of the Aqueous Root Extract of Euclea divinorum Hiern (Ebenaceae) against Plasmodium berghei ANKA. Evidence-based Complement Altern Med. 2022;2022:7068999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Atanu FO, Idih FM, Nwonuma CO, Hetta HF, Alamery S, El-Saber Batiha G. Evaluation of Antimalarial Potential of Extracts from Alstonia boonei and Carica papaya in Plasmodium berghei -Infected Mice. Evidence-based Complement Altern Med. 2021;2021:2599191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Chaniad P, Phuwajaroanpong A, Plirat W. Assessment of antimalarial activity of crude extract of Chan-Ta-Lee-La and Pra-Sa-Chan- Dang formulations and their plant ingredients for new drug candidates of malaria treatment : In vitro and in vivo experiments. PLOS ONE . 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296756

  69. Nwonuma CO, Balogun EA, Gyebi GA. Evaluation of Antimalarial Activity of Ethanolic Extract of Annona muricata L.: An in vivo and an in silico Approach. J Evidence-Based Integr Med. 2023;28:1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Ibrahim ZG, Maiha BB. In-vivo Antiplasmodial activity of the methanol root extract of Andropogon schirensis in Plasmodium berghei infected mice. Curr Studs Agri Educ Human Law Manage Sci Med Sci Technol. 2023;4(5):177–92.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ryley JF, Peters W. The antimalarial activity of some quinolone esters. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1970;64(2):209–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Atanu FO, Rotimi D, Ilesanmi OB, Malki JS Al, Batiha GE, Idakwoji PA. Hydroethanolic Extracts of Senna alata Leaves Possess Antimalarial Effects and Reverses Haematological and Biochemical Pertubation in Plasmodium berghei -infected Mice. J Evidence-Based Integr Med. 2022;27:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Peters W. Drug resistance in plasmodium berghei. Exp Parasitol. 1965;17(1):80–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Prapaporn C, Phuwajaroanpong A, Plirat W, Techarang T. In vivo assessment of the antimalarial activity and acute oral toxicity of an ethanolic seed extract of Spondias pinnata ( L.f.) Kurz. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2022;9:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-022-03546-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Ezeonu CS, Ejikeme CM. Qualitative and Quantitative Determination of Phytochemical Contents of Indigenous Nigerian Softwoods. New Journ of Scie. 2016;9:5601327. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5601327.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Poespoprodjo JR, Douglas NM, Ansong D, Kho S, Anstey NM. Malaria Lancet. 2023;402(10419):2328–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Bashige Chiribagula Valentin, Bakari Amuri Salvius, Kahumba Byanga Joseph, Okusa Ndjolo Philippe, Lumbu Simbi Jean-Baptiste. Antiplasmodial, antioxidant and toxicological study of leaves extracts of Dalbergia katangensis Lecheneaud (Fabaceae) from Eastern DR Congo. GSC Adv Res Rev. 2020;4(2):034–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Asrade S, Mengesha Y, Moges G, Gelayee DA. In vivo antiplasmodial activity evaluation of the leaves of Balanites rotundifolia (Van Tiegh.) Blatter (Balanitaceae) against Plasmodium berghei. J Exp Pharmacol. 2017;9:59–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. T S, S I, A R, A J. Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of the acetone extracts of the leaves of Lagenaria siceraria and Cucurbita pepo. Food Chem Adv. 2023;3:100556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Wei L, Adderley J, Leroy D, Drewry DH, Danny Wilson W. Host-directed therapy, an untapped opportunity for antimalarial intervention. Cell Reports Med. 2021;2:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Andrews KA, Wesche D, McCarthy J, Möhrle JJ, Tarning J, Phillips L, et al. Model-Informed Drug Development for Malaria Therapeutics. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018;58:567–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Fidock DA, Rosenthal PJ, Croft SL, Brun R, Nwaka S, Einstein A. Antimalarial drug discovery : efficacy models for compound screening. Nat Rev. 2004;3:509–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Nureye D, Kedir MS, Muluye RA, Hammeso WW, Tekalign E. In vivo antiplasmodial activity of hydromethanolic leaf extract and solvent fractions of Maytenus gracilipes (Celastraceae) against Plasmodium berghei in mice. Heliyon. 2021;7(11):e08457.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Baah MK, Mensah AY, Asante-Kwatia E, Amponsah IK, Forkuo AD, Harley BK, et al. In vivo antiplasmodial activity of different solvent extracts of Myrianthus libericus stem bark and its constituents in Plasmodium berghei -infected mice. Evidence-based Complement Altern Med. 2020;2020:1–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8703197.

  85. Orabueze CI, Adesegun SA, Ota DA, Coker HA. In vivo antiplasmodial activities of four Nigerian plants used singly and in polyherbal combination against plasmodium berghei infection. Indian J Tradit Knowl. 2018;17(4):716–23.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Akachukwu A, Ikegbunam M, Enyi E, Onochie-Igbinedion TOI, Abone H, Ezeagwuna D, et al. Evaluation of Antiplasmodial Effect of Methanol Leaf Extract and Fractions of <i>Eucalyptus camadulensis</i> (Denhn) in Albino Wistar Mice. Am J Plant Sci. 2023;14(06):662–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Abdulkadir SS, Jatau AI, Abdussalam US, Bichi LA. In vivo antiplasmodial activity of the methanol leaf extract of Piliostigma reticulatum ( Dc .) Hochst ( Fabaceae ). Bull Natl Res Cent. 2022; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-022-00910-0

  88. Tadege G, Alebachew Y, Hymete A, Tadesse S. Identification of lobetyolin as a major antimalarial constituent of the roots of Lobelia giberroa Hemsl. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2022;18(December 2021):43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2022.01.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Otuu CA, Obiezue RNN, Eke SS, Usman-yamman H, Ekuma IC. Medical Parasitology & Epidemiology Sciences Anti-malarial and Therapeutic Potential of Ethanolic Leaf and Root Extracts of Alstonia boonei Against Plasmodium berghei Infection in Mice. Aras Part Med Int Press. 2023;4(2):41–4. https://doi.org/10.34172/ijmpes.3117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Okokon JE, Mobley R, Edem UA, Bassey AI. In vitro and in vivo antimalarial activity and chemical profiling of sugarcane leaves. Sci Rep. 2022;1–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14391-8

  91. Pinma K, Hiriot W, Soonthornchareonno N, Jongsaku K, Sireeratawon S, Tor-Udo S. In vitro and in vivo antiplasmodial activity and cytotoxicity of water extracts of Phyllanthus emblica, Terminalia chebula, and Terminalia bellerica. J Med Assoc Thail. 2010;93(7):120–6.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Kouliga KB, Serge YR, Ollo D, Sibidou Y, Magloire NH, Georges Anicet O, et al. In Vivo Antimalarial Activity, Safety and Phytochemical Screening of Canthium Multiflorum (Schumach. & Thonn.) Hiern (Rubiaceae). J Complement Med Alt Healthc J. 2020;10(5):196–204.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Muluye RA, Berihun AM, Gelagle AA, Lemmi WG, Assamo FT, Gemeda HB, et al. Evaluation of In Vivo Antiplasmodial and Toxicological Effect of Calpurnia aurea, Aloe debrana, Vernonia amygdalina and Croton macrostachyus Extracts in Mice. Med Chem. 2021;11(4):5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Adugna M, Feyera T, Taddese W, Admasu P. In vivo Antimalarial Activity of Crude Extract of Aerial Part of Artemisia abyssinica Against Plasmodium berghei in Mice. Glob J Pharmacol. 2014;8(3):460–8.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Olasehinde GI, Ayanda OI, Egwari LO, Ajayi AA, Awofeso T. In vivo antiplasmodial activity of crude ethanolic and n-hexane extracts of Moringa oleifera leaves. Int J Agric Biol. 2016;18(5):906–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Wilfred G, Songoro EK, Gathirwa JW, Kimani F, Kariuki HN. In vivo antiplasmodial activities of stem bark extracts of Avicennia marina in Plasmodium berghei-infected mice. Pan Afr Med J. 2023;44(93):1–19. 10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2023.44.93.38448.

  97. Zaruwa M, Madu JO, Yusuf AA, Muhammed AOO. In vivo Antiplasmodial and Cytotoxic Activity of Achyranthes aspera and Ficus thoningii in Mice Infected with Plasmodium berghei. Int Biol Biomed J. 2018;4(1):48–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Gazwi HSS, Mahmoud ME, Toson EMA. Analysis of the phytochemicals of Coriandrum sativum and Cichorium intybus aqueous extracts and their biological effects on broiler chickens. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10329-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Valluri H, Bhanot A, Shah S, Bhandaru N, Sundriyal S. Basic Nitrogen (BaN) Is a Key Property of Antimalarial Chemical Space. J Med Chem. 2023;66(13):8382–406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Uzor PF. Alkaloids from plants with antimalarial activity: a review of recent studies. Evidence-based Complement Altern Med. 2020;2020:1–17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8749083.

  101. Chaniad P, Techarang T, Phuwajaroanpong A, Horata N, Septama AW, Punsawad C. Exploring Potential Antimalarial Candidate from Medicinal Plants of Kheaw Hom Remedy. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022;7(11):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  102. OECD. OECD Guideline 425: Acute Oral Toxicity—up-and-down Procedure. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Paris, France. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Great thanks go to the Pharmacy Department of Mattu University for allowing the laboratory facility where the work was done. The authors would also like to give credit to the EPHI for donation of the P. berghei.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not for profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.H: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, supervision, validation, visualization, original draft, writing - review and editing. S.H: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, original draft, writing - review and editing. O.J: formal analysis, Conceptualization, data curation, validation, writing - review and editing. W.A, K.E, W.M, G.S, W.G, M.D, S.T, M.M, A.K: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, validation, writing - review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Getu Habte.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Plant material collection was performed following the National Policy on Biodiversity Conservation and Research Proclamation, Regulations and Direction, Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute, Ethiopia. The protocols used in this experimental work and animal use were reviewed and approved by the Research and Technical Review Committee, Pharmacy Department, Mattu University, with reference number ‘Pharm 2019/17’. All the staffs involved in the research and animal handling were appropriately trained on the care and use of laboratory animals. The experimental theatre employed in this work was following the international guideline for studies utilizing animals, and all the protocols in this study were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations for using animals in compliance with the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Habte, G., Habte, S., Jilo, O. et al. Antimalarial efficacy test of the aqueous crude leaf extract of Coriandrum sativum Linn.: an in vivo multiple model experimental study in mice infected with Plasmodium berghei. BMC Complement Med Ther 24, 267 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-024-04577-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-024-04577-0

Keywords