Skip to main content
Download PDF

Variation of the essential oil components of Citrus aurantium leaves upon using different distillation techniques and evaluation of their antioxidant, antidiabetic, and neuroprotective effect against Alzheimer’s disease

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies volume 24, Article number: 73 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Citrus fruit essential oil is considered one of the widely studied essential oils while its leaves attract less attention although being rich in nearly the same composition as the peel and flowers. The leaves of bitter orange or sour orange (Citrus aurantium L.) were extracted using three different techniques namely; hydrodistillation (HD), steam distillation (SD), and microwave-assisted distillation (MV) to compare their chemical composition. The three essential oil samples were analyzed through GC/FID and GC/MS analyses. The samples were tested in vitro using different antioxidant techniques (DPPH, ABTS, CUPRAC, FRAP, PBD, and MCA), neuroprotective enzyme inhibitory activities (acetylcholine and butyl choline enzymes), and antidiabetic activities (α-amylase and α-glucosidase). The results showed that thirty-five volatile ingredients were detected and quantified. Monoterpenes represented the most abundant class in the three essential oils followed by sesquiterpenes. C. aurantium essential oil carried potential antioxidant activity where SD exhibited the highest antioxidant activity, with values arranged in the following order: FRAP (200.43 mg TE/g), CUPRAC (138.69 mg TE/g), ABTS (129.49 mg TE/g), and DPPH (51.67 mg TE/g). SD essential oil also presented the most potent α-amylase (0.32) inhibition while the MV essential oil showed the highest α-glucosidase inhibition (2.73 mmol ACAE/g), followed by HD (2.53 mmol ACAE/g), and SD (2.46 mmol ACAE/g). The SD essential oil exhibited the highest BChE and AChE inhibitory activities (3.73 and 2.06 mg GALAE/g), respectively). Thus, bitter orange essential oil can act as a potential source of potent antioxidant, antidiabetic, and neuroprotective activities for future drug leads.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Essential oils and their components for a long time have been used in health, food, and aromatherapy. Essential oils are composed of many components, of varying concentrations and chemical structures [1, 2]. The growing interest in food safety is today gaining momentum for both the food industry and consumers as all are becoming more careful about the several health and environmental effects of foods. Natural products used in cosmetics and pharmaceutics processing today play a great role; their positive benefits on both health and the environment have made them the main principles of what formed a healthy diet today and, in the future [1, 2].

Citrus plant production has reached more than 126 million tons per year [3], where the Mediterranean region obsesses about one-fifth. This makes Citrus an economically important tree crop. Citrus is known to be rich in vitamins as B9, C and E, coumarins, dietary fiber and antioxidants [3,4,5,6].

The chemical composition of Citrus essential oil has been extensively studied and several compositional patterns owing to the species/cultivars, origin, climate, season, ripening stage, extraction, and analytical methods have been published. (Citrus aurantium L.) is a member of the family Rutaceae. It is famous in the Mediterranean region for many ornamental and agronomic uses. Peels and flowers represent the most-used parts of C. aurantium L. thus forming the base for many promising research groups due to their many medicinal properties [3]. Citrus aurantium L. var amara commonly named bitter or sour orange “Narenja Agria” [4], is widespread in Central and South America but mainly in the Mediterranean countries [5], where it is used in a large area from the industry as a flavoring agent or a fragrance to medicine as a nasal decongestant and a dieting agent [6]. The chemical compositions of leaves essential oils (LEO) and peel essential oils (PEO) from bitter oranges have been reported in the literature, where the main compounds in the LEO were linalool and linalyl acetate [7] whereas the PEO was dominated by limonene [7].

The chemical composition of the essential oil of sour orange (Citrus aurantium) was assessed in different plant parts during different seasons. Many studies were focused on the essential oil extracted from C. aurantium peels and limonene was found to be the major component. In contrast, other studies carried out on essential oil extracted from C. aurantium flowers showed that linalool and linalyl acetate are the main components. However, the volatile oil constituents from leaves have not received much attention in the literature. Indeed, the few reported studies that focused on C. aurantium leaves showed that linalool is the main component of essential oil. In addition, a large number of studies on C. aurantium were performed in Tunisia and Greece [3].

Sweet and bitter oranges are two of the most commercially important fruits with a huge world production due to their vast array of nutritive and therapeutic potentials. Sugar/acid ratios are regarded as the main index of citrus fruit maturity and one of the major analytical measures of its flavor quality [8]. Sweet orange plays an important therapeutic role in being active as an anti-diabetic, anti-obesity, and hypocholesterolemic agent. The peels and other waste by-products of the two kinds of citrus have a lot of therapeutic applications as nutraceuticals and functional foods. Peels and flowers, the most-used parts of Citrus aurantium, have constituted a largely promising area of research for their many medicinal properties. However, the leaves of sour orange have not yet been studied extensively. The essential oil of the bitter orange leaves from Algeria was analyzed using GC/MS. Forty-three volatile compounds were detected in essential oil and the majority of them were linalool, linalyl acetate, and a-Terpineol. The essential oil had an interesting level of elastase and collagenase inhibition and thus can be applied as an anti-aging agent [3, 9, 10]. This research article targeted the study of the effect of changing the essential oil extraction method on the composition of the essential oil of the leaves of Citrus aurantium together with the evaluation of its antioxidant, antidiabetic, and neuroprotective activities.

Materials and methods

Plant collection

The leaves of Citrus aurantium also known as bitter or sour orange were collected from a private farm in Shibin Al Kawm City, Al Minufiyah, Egypt in March 2023. The collected plant sample was authenticated by Dr. Usama K. Abdel Hameed, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. A voucher specimen (voucher specimen number; PHG-P-CA-461) was deposited at the Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Essential oil preparation

Hydrodistillation

The dried rinds of Citrus aurantium (250 g) were subjected to four hours of hydrodistillation using a Clevenger-type glass apparatus. The oils were collected (1.4 ml) and then preserved at 4 °C in sealed vials for further analysis. The experiment was repeated three times.

Steam distillation

The dried rinds of Citrus aurantium (250 g) were subjected to three hours of steam distillation using a steam distillation apparatus. The oil (1.0 ml) in the organic layer was dried using anhydrous sodium sulfate and stored in a vial at room temperature for further analysis. The experiment was repeated three times.

Microwave-assisted hydro-distillation

A domestic microwave (MW), with an output power of 1000 Wattage, was assembled with a Clevenger apparatus. The dried Citrus aurantium (250 g) was homogenized and soaked in 500 mL distilled water transferred into the microwave and connected to the distillation apparatus. In the beginning, the MW was set at 50% of its power for 4 min (to initiate the boiling) then changed to 30% power for 40 min and left for 10 min to cool to yield 0.8 ml of the essential oil.

GC/FID and GC/MS analysis

The GC/FID and GC/MS analysis were performed using the method adopted from [11].

Antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory assays

To appraise the antioxidant potential of the extracts, six distinct spectrophotometric tests were conducted. This consisted of the ABTS and DPPH assays, that assess the antioxidants’ aptitude to neutralize free radicals. Through the FRAP and CUPRAC tests, the reduction potential of the extract was assessed. Phosphomolybdenum and ferrozine assays also measured the total antioxidant ability and metal chelating potential, respectively. Apart from MCA, each of these assays was evaluated with a Trolox standard. As for MCA, its comparison was made according to the EDTA equivalent per gram of essential oil. All procedures are detailed in our previous works [12, 13]. To investigate the inhibitory effects of the tested essential oils on various enzymes, we applied acetylcholinesterase (AChE), butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), tyrosinase, amylase, and glucosidase. Our earlier work provides information on the experimental procedures [12, 14]. We measured AChE and BChE inhibition in terms of milligrams of galanthamine equivalents (GALAE) per gram of essential oil, tyrosinase inhibition expressed as milligrams of kojic acid equivalents (KAE) per gram of essential oil, and α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition quantified as millimoles of acarbose equivalents (ACAE) per gram of essential oil. The details of experimental procedures are given in the supplementary materials.

Statistical analysis

Antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory results were statistically evaluated. Statistical analysis was conducted with the help of Xl Stat (Version 16, Addinsoft Inc., New York, NY, USA). Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation of 3 measurements. A significance level of p < 0.05 was applied to One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test to identify statistically significant differences between groups.

Results

GC/MS analysis of Citrus aurantium leaves essential oil

The essential oil of the leaves of Citrus aurantium was prepared using three different distillation techniques namely; hydrodistillation (HD), steam distillation (SD), and microwave-assisted distillation (MV). The three prepared essential oils were analyzed using GC/FID and GC/MS analyses where thirty-five volatile components were qualitatively and quantitatively identified (Table 1). The % identification ranged from 99.97 to 99.98% with monoterpenes being the most abundant class in the three essential oils followed by sesquiterpenes (Fig. 1).

Table 1 Volatile components identified from Citrus aurantium leaves essential oil
Full size table

Eucalyptol (69.92%), α-terpinyl acetate (9.86%), and 4 (10)-thujene (4.02%) were the major identified from the steam distilled essential oil while the hydrodistilled C. aurantium essential oil showed the presence of linalool acetate (64.08%), linalool (24.04%) and α-terpineol (5.14%) as the main identified components. Moreover, linalool acetate (57.13%), linalool (23.69%), α-terpineol (7.82%), and geranyl acetate (7.31%) were the main ingredients of the microwave-assisted isolated essential oil (Table 1; Fig. 2).

As mentioned earlier the monoterpene class of compounds were among the main identified class with its two types, the non-oxygenated and the oxygenated types. Eucalyptol (69.92%), linalool acetate (23.69-64.08%), linalool (23.69-24.04%), α-terpineol (5.14-7.82%), geranyl acetate (7.31%) and 4(10)-thujene (4.02%). In addition to that, sesquiterpenes were the second most abundant class and were only traced from the steam distilled essential oil with β-elemene (0.28%), caryophyllene (0.18%) and α-selinene (0.11%) as the main identified group from the sesquiterpene class while caryophyllene oxide (0.46%), eudesm-4(14)-en-11-ol (0.36%), spatulenol (0.20%) and dehydrocostuslactone (0.15%) were the major components from the oxygenated sesquiterpenes.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Bar chart showing the main identified classes of compounds from the three C. aurantium essential oils

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Structures of the major identified essential oil components from the three C. aurantium essential oils

Full size image

Study of the biological activities of citrus aurantium leaves essential oil

Antioxidant activity

A wide array of assays can be employed to directly measure the transfer of hydrogen atoms or electrons from potential antioxidants to free radicals in simplified “lipid-free” systems. The reported antioxidant activities obtained through these methods are typically linked to their ability to scavenge specific types of radical species, some of which may be artificially generated and biologically insignificant [15]. Consequently, many antioxidant assays are employed to assess the antioxidant potential of natural products. In the current study, six distinct antioxidant assays were utilized namely, DPPH, ABTS, CUPRAC, FRAP, PBD, and MCA. The results of the antioxidant assays indicated that the essential oil extracted by SD exhibited the highest antioxidant activity, with values arranged in the following order: FRAP (200.43 mg TE/g), CUPRAC (138.69 mg TE/g), ABTS (129.49 mg TE/g), and DPPH (51.67 mg TE/g). In the case of the MV-extracted essential oil, the order of antioxidant activity is consistent with that of the SD extract, with values arranged as follows: MV FRAP (57.21 mg TE/g), CUPRAC (37.44 mg TE/g), ABTS (35.75 mg TE/g), and DPPH (15.00 mg TE/g). Moreover, the MV extraction method essential oil demonstrated the highest PBD (37.87 mmol TE/g) and MCA (32.14 mmol TE/g) values. Conversely, the HD-extracted essential oil exhibited comparatively lower activity in all the antioxidant tests, particularly in the case of DPPH, where it recorded only 10.41 mg TE/g (Table 2).

Table 2 Antioxidant effects of the three Citrus aurantium essential oil samples
Full size table

Enzymes inhibitory activity

Compounds that influence the rates of enzyme-catalyzed reactions are called modulators. Those whose effect is to reduce the rate is called inhibition [16]. Enzyme inhibitors have diverse applications, including pharmaceuticals for humans and animals, as well as herbicides and pesticides. The process of enzyme inhibition is a subject of extensive examination due to its significant relevance in understanding enzyme mechanisms [17] and its role in pharmacological research [18, 19]. As an illustration, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), a major neurodegenerative disorder, predominantly affects the older and pre-elderly population [20]. This neurological disorder results from a shortage of acetylcholine (ACh) and is characterized by heightened brain tissue degeneration. The enzymes acetylcholine esterase (AChE) and butylcholine esterase (BChE) are identified as the key players in the hydrolysis of ACh in the human body [21].

Table 3 indicates that the SD-extracted essential oil exhibited the highest BChE inhibition activity, with a measurement of 3.73 mg GALAE/g, and AChE inhibition, with a value of 2.06 mg GALAE/g. Following closely, the HB-extracted essential oil demonstrated BChE inhibition at 2.92 mg GALAE/g and AChE inhibition at 2.00 mg GALAE/g. In contrast, the MV-extracted essential oil displayed the lowest activity, with 0.66 mg GALAE/g for AChE inhibition and 0.39 mg GALAE/g for BChE inhibition. These findings align with the antioxidant activity observed in the extracted oil, as presented in Table 2.

Tyrosinase plays a pivotal role in initiating the synthesis of melanin, leading to the browning phenomena observed in fruits, vegetables, and mushrooms upon bruising or prolonged storage. In the realm of mammals, tyrosinase not only contributes to the pigmentation of hair and skin [22], but it also influences skin conditions, giving rise to hypo (such as vitiligo) or hyper (manifesting as flecks or freckles) pigmentation [23]. This has led to a notable upsurge of interest in researching, developing, and screening potent tyrosinase inhibitors, making it a prominent focus in agriculture, food, medicine, and cosmetics [24]. Table 3 demonstrates that the essential oil extracted from HD exhibited a significantly higher inhibition activity of 62.51 mg KAE/g, whereas the essential oil from SD exhibited an inhibition rate of 44.62 mg KAE/g. Notably, it was observed that the essential oil extracted from MV did not exhibit any significant activity against tyrosinase.

Type 2 Diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a common health issue with elevated blood glucose levels that can lead to severe complications, including nephropathy, neuropathy, and cardiovascular disease [25]. In the management of T2DM, the inhibition of pancreatic α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes, responsible for breaking down dietary carbohydrates, can result in delayed glucose uptake, reduced carbohydrate digestion, and a decrease in blood sugar levels [26]. This approach is crucial in controlling postprandial hyperglycemia in T2DM [26, 27]. The current research findings reveal that SD essential oil exhibited the greatest α-amylase inhibition at 0.32, surpassing the HD essential oil, which measured inhibition at 0.19. Regarding α-glucosidase inhibition, MV essential oil demonstrated the highest level of α-glucosidase (2.73 mmol ACAE/g), followed by HD (2.53 mmol ACAE/g), and SD (2.46 mmol ACAE/g).

Table 3 Enzyme inhibitory effects of the three Citrus aurantium essential oil samples
Full size table

Discussion

Plant extracts and essential oils have gained much interest recently due to their interesting chemical composition together with potent biological activities which positioned them on top of research interests worldwide [28,29,30]. Genus citrus is famous for its well-known species viz. orange, lemon, lime, grapefruit, and many others. Citrus essential oils were documented to contain many oxygenated and non-oxygenated terpenes. The volatile components were usually isolated from the leaves [3, 31], flowers [32], fruits [33], fruit rind [34], bark [35], and even the seeds [36]. Many biological activities were reported for the Citrus essential oils including; antiviral [29, 37], antibacterial [28, 38, 39], anti-inflammatory [40, 41], antioxidant [38, 42], cytotoxic [43,44,45,46], etc.

Sour orange also known as Citrus aurantium is one of the famous and well-studied Citrus species, especially its essential oil content. Herein, one hundred and two volatile components were identified and quantified from three essential oil samples of C. aurantium and they were different in the oil preparation method. As discussed earlier in the results, the hydrodistilled and microwave-assisted extraction of the sour orange essential oils showed nearly similar volatile oil contents with the same components in both of them with differences in the compositions of these components. Moreover, the hydrodistilled essential oil (HD) showed the unique presence of camphene while the microwave-assisted (MV) showed the presence of β-ocimene which was absent in the HD essential oil. On the other hand, the steam-distilled (SD) essential oil presented a unique chemical composition when compared to the two other oil samples. β-Pinene, β-myrcene, linalool, and α-terpineol were found to be common components for the three essential oil samples while the latter two components were major in the HD and MV essential oils they represented minor or even trace components of the SD essential oil.

As reported in the literature, steam distillation marks the most recommended method for extraction of Citrus essential oils compared to other conventional methods [47] due to its ability to allow the liberation of the volatile components under controlled conditions of pressure and temperature compared to the atmospheric pressure in case of hydrodistillation for example [48, 49]. Other studies on C. aurantium essential oil addressed the effect of the isolation technique on both the quality and the essential oil yield. One study compared the essential oil components from C. aurantium blossoms obtained through seven isolation methodologies namely; commercial hydrodistillation, hydrodistillation, steam distillation, ohmic-assisted hydro distillation, solvent-less microwave extraction, solvent-free microwave extraction and microwave-assisted hydrodistillation where hydrodistillation showed the highest essential oil yield compared to the other methods [50].

Another study compared four isolation techniques namely; hydrodistillation, solvent extraction, microwave-assisted extraction, and ultrasound-assisted extraction regarding the essential oil composition of the peels of C. aurantifolia, C. limon and C. sinensis. This study concluded that both hydrodistillation and solvent extraction were superior in the isolation of mono- and sesquiterpenes while the two other methods led to the isolation of essential oils with higher percentages of hydrocarbons, oxygenated monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, oxygenated sesquiterpenes and fatty acids [51]. Thus, upon the results of such studies and when comparing them to our current study. The essential oil composition can vary according to many factors mainly centered on the isolation technique, the part used in the extraction process, the different species also the seasonal variation. All or part of these factors eventually led to new essential oil components even from the same plant species thus proper selection and optimization of the distillation technique plays crucial role in the quality and quantity of the resulting essential oil.

Many earlier studies had highlighted the chemical components and medical importance of sour orange essential oils. The essential oil from C. aurantium peels was rich with limonene as the main component with about 90% of the total oil content and it exhibited potent antioxidant activities with ABTS•+ (44.93 ± 1.45%) and DPPH• (11.03 ± 1.08%) inhibition [52]. The essential oil of C. aurantium leaves was evaluated for its composition together with its potential antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. The essential oil contained forty-three components (yield = 0.57%). Linalool, linalyl acetate, and α-terpineol composed the bulk of the essential oil composition. The antioxidant activity was evaluated through a DPPH assay (IC50 > 10,000 mg/L) [3].

The hydrodistilled essential oil contents of the leaves and peel of C. aurantium were compared where the leaves essential oil contained linalool (18.6%), γ-terpinene (6.9%) and α-terpineol (15.1%) as its main compounds while the peel essential oil was rich in linalool (12%), cis-linalool oxide (8.1%), trans-carveol (11.9%), endo-fenchyl acetate (5.5%) and carvone (5.8%) [7].

Different herbal extracts and essential oils represent promising reservoirs of naturally occurring compounds that exhibit antioxidant properties. A prior investigation has documented the most robust DPPH scavenging activity within the C. aurantium extract, demonstrating IC50 values of 96.07 µg/ml, and its corresponding essential oil, with IC50 values of 393.71 µg/ml [53]. The essential oil extracted through SD exhibited elevated concentrations of both monoterpene and sesquiterpene components. A prior investigation showed their antioxidant effectiveness, which closely paralleled that of the phenolic constituents found in C. aurantium [53]. These molecules effectively disrupted free-radical chain reactions and induced their transformation into inert compounds, as supported by additional studies [54, 55]. The findings of our study align with those of several other researchers who have affirmed the antioxidant capabilities of Citrus essential oils [3, 53, 54, 56]. Nonetheless, presenting their antioxidant efficacy in IC50 values makes it challenging to make a direct comparison with the current study, given the difference in units of measurement.

The current study assessed the therapeutic potential of essential oil extracted from C. aurantium using three distinct extraction methods in the context of AD treatment. This evaluation involves the examination of their effects on AChE and BChE inhibition assays. In AD pharmacotherapy, AChE and BChE inhibitors are frequently used to target essential enzymes, easing cognitive symptoms and slowing disease progression [25]. The elevated monoterpenes content in Citrus essential oils provides a plausible rationale for their bioactivity. Numerous studies have underscored the AChE inhibitory properties associated with this category of secondary metabolites. Previous research has explored the potential of various monoterpenoids from Citrus essential oils, including monoterpene, oxygenated monoterpene, and sesquiterpene compounds, for inhibiting cholinesterase enzymes, with a significant focus on AChE inhibition [57, 58]. There are reports of certain citrus essential oils displaying radical scavenging capabilities [59]. For instance, Eureka lemon essential oil, known for its potent tyrosinase inhibitory properties, has also been observed to exhibit DPPH radical scavenging activity [60]. Previous study and the present results suggests that citrus essential oils, composed of a diverse array of compounds, may effectively inhibit melanogenesis through a multifaceted range of mechanisms and activities.

To manage diabetes, reducing post-meal high blood sugar levels involves inhibiting two crucial digestive enzymes: α-amylase and α-glucosidase, responsible for breaking down complex carbohydrates into simpler sugars. This study unveiled the potential antidiabetic properties of C. aurantium essential oil by demonstrating their inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase in vitro, corroborating prior citrus extract research [61, 62]. These findings, along with previous studies, suggest that the presence of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes, along with their synergistic interactions, likely underlie these enzymes’ suppressive effects of the essential oils.

The observed enzyme inhibitory effects can be explained by the presence of some volatile components in the tested essential oils. For example, the SD essential oil was rich in eucalyptol and the compound had a potent cholinesterase inhibition [63,64,65], amylase inhibition [66] and glucosidase inhibition [67]. Regarding the HD and MW essential oils contained higher concentration of linalool and linalool acetate. Similarly, some studies have been found significant enzyme inhibitory properties of the compounds; Acetylcholinesterase; [68, 69], tyrosinase [70], glucosidase inhibition [71]. However, as can be seen in Table 1, the essential oils contained several compounds, so their synergistic and antagonistic effects are possible. In this sense, we proposed further studies to isolate the components and test their enzyme inhibitory potential as individuals.

In the current study, components like linalool acetate, α-terpinyl acetate, linalool, and eucalyptol represented the main essential oil components obtained through the three studied distillation techniques. The aforementioned components belong to the oxygenated monoterpene class of volatile constituents which is well-known for its potent antioxidant and neuroprotective effects through their ability to fight against oxidative stress and support the natural oxidant-antioxidant balance [72,73,74] as well as their potential antidiabetic activity through inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase as the main enzymes involved in the process [75]. Moreover, they can modulate enzymes and proteins that contribute to insulin resistance and other pathological events caused by Diabetes milletus [76].

Conclusion

It can be concluded that the essential oil of Citrus aurantium represented a valuable source of essential oil components viz. linalool acetate, α-terpinyl acetate, linalool and eucalyptol. The different applied extraction methods in this article namely, hydrodistillation, steam distillation and microwave-assisted distillation provided different patterns of volatile constituent distribution although steam distillation was somehow different from the two other methods in its components. Monoterpenes were the main identified compounds followed by sesquiterpenes. The three sour orange essential oils showed promising antioxidant, antidiabetic, and neuroprotective activities in vitro through enzyme inhibition. The postulated biological effects were attributed to the presence of a higher percentage of oxygenated monoterpenes in the three essential oil samples. The authors recommend future in silico and in vivo studies on the main identified essential oil constituents against the potential biological binding sockets also further analysis of the chemical composition of the Citrus aurantium leaf essential oil using more advanced extraction techniques will give a wider view of the effect of varying the distillation process on the essential oil components which will further affect the biological activity.

Data availability

Data are available upon request from the first author, Esraa A. Elhawary, esraa.elhawary@pharma.asu.edu.eg.

References

  1. El Kharraf S, El-Guendouz S, Farah A, Mateus MC, Miguel MG. Impact of fifteen combinations of the main components of Rosemary, lavender and citrus essential oils on in vitro biological activities. S Afr J Bot. 2023;156:162–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shahat EA, Bakr RO, Eldahshan OA, Ayoub NA. Chemical composition and biological activities of the essential oil from leaves and flowers of Pulicaria incisa Sub. candolleana (Family Asteraceae). Chem Biodivers 2017, 14(4):e1600156.

  3. Oulebsir C, Mefti-Korteby H, Djazouli Z-E, Zebib B, Merah O. Essential oil of Citrus aurantium L. leaves: composition, antioxidant activity, elastase and collagenase inhibition. Volume 12. Agronomy; 2022. p. 1466. 6.

  4. Ashmawy A, Mostafa N, Eldahshan O. GC/MS analysis and molecular profiling of lemon volatile oil against breast cancer. J Essent Oil Bear Plant. 2019;22(4):903–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eldahshan OA, Halim AF. Comparison of the composition and antimicrobial activities of the essential oils of green branches and leaves of Egyptian navel orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck var. Malesy). Chem Biodivers. 2016;13(6):681–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Suntar I, Khan H, Patel S, Celano R, Rastrelli L. An overview on Citrus aurantium L.: Its functions as food ingredient and therapeutic agent. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2018, 2018.

  7. Abderrezak M, Abaza I, Aburjai T, Kabouche A, Kabouche Z. Comparative compositions of essential oils of Citrus aurantium growing in different soils. J Mater Environ Sci. 2014;5(6):1913–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Farag MA, Abib B, Ayad L, Khattab AR. Sweet and bitter oranges: an updated comparative review of their bioactives, nutrition, food quality, therapeutic merits and biowaste valorization practices. Food Chem. 2020;331:127306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shwaish MM, Farhan WT, Mohammed TT. Antidiabetic and antihyperglycemic effect of citrus.

  10. Ayaz M, Sadiq A, Junaid M, Ullah F, Subhan F, Ahmed J. Neuroprotective and anti-aging potentials of essential oils from aromatic and medicinal plants. Front Aging Neurosci 2017, 9:168.

  11. Aly SH, Eldahshan OA, Al-Rashood ST, Binjubair FA, El Hassab MA, Eldehna WM, Dall’Acqua S, Zengin G. Chemical constituents, antioxidant, and enzyme inhibitory activities supported by in-silico study of n-hexane extract and essential oil of guava leaves. Molecules. 2022;27(24):8979.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Uysal S, Zengin G, Locatelli M, Bahadori MB, Mocan A, Bellagamba G, De Luca E, Mollica A, Aktumsek A. Cytotoxic and enzyme inhibitory potential of two Potentilla species (P. Speciosa L. and P. reptans Willd.) And their chemical composition. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:290.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zengin G, Aktumsek A. Investigation of antioxidant potentials of solvent extracts from different anatomical parts of Asphodeline Anatolica E. Tuzlaci: an endemic plant to Turkey. Afr J Trad Complement Altern Med. 2014;11(2):481–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zengin G. A study on in vitro enzyme inhibitory properties of Asphodeline anatolica: new sources of natural inhibitors for public health problems. Ind Crop Prod. 2016;83:39–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shahidi F, Zhong Y. Measurement of antioxidant activity. J Funct Food. 2015;18:757–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Saboury A. Enzyme inhibition and activation: a general theory. J Iran Chem Soc. 2009;6:219–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Boyer PD, Krebs EG. The enzymes: Academic Press; 1986.

  18. Yazbeck DR, Martinez CA, Hu S, Tao J. Challenges in the development of an efficient enzymatic process in the pharmaceutical industry. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2004;15(18):2757–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zengin G, Nilofar, Yildiztugay E, Bouyahya A, Cavusoglu H, Gevrenova R, Zheleva-Dimitrova D. A comparative study on UHPLC-HRMS profiles and biological activities of Inula sarana different extracts and its beta-cyclodextrin complex: effective insights for novel applications. Antioxidants. 2023;12(10):1842.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Knopman DS, Amieva H, Petersen RC, Chételat G, Holtzman DM, Hyman BT, Nixon RA, Jones DT. Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2021;7(1):33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Y, Yang Y, Hong KH, Ning Y, Yu P, Ren J, Ji M, Cai J. Design, synthesis and evaluation of a novel metal chelator as multifunctional agents for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Bioorg Chem. 2019;87:720–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Del Marmol V, Beermann F. Tyrosinase and related proteins in mammalian pigmentation. FEBS Lett. 1996;381(3):165–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cohen BE, Manga P, Lin K, Elbuluk N. Vitiligo and melanoma-associated vitiligo: understanding their similarities and differences. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020;21:669–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mermer A, Demirci S. Recent advances in triazoles as tyrosinase inhibitors. Eu J Med Chem 2023:115655.

  25. Ademiluyi AO, Oboh G. Soybean phenolic-rich extracts inhibit key-enzymes linked to type 2 diabetes (α-amylase and α-glucosidase) and hypertension (angiotensin I converting enzyme) in vitro. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2013;65(3):305–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Amalfitano A, Bengur AR, Morse RP, Majure JM, Case LE, Veerling DL, Mackey J, Kishnani P, Smith W, McVie-Wylie A. Recombinant human acid α-glucosidase enzyme therapy for infantile glycogen storage disease type II: results of a phase I/II clinical trial. Genet Med. 2001;3(2):132–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Li Y, Wen S, Kota BP, Peng G, Li GQ, Yamahara J, Roufogalis BD. Punica granatum flower extract, a potent α-glucosidase inhibitor, improves postprandial hyperglycemia in Zucker diabetic fatty rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;99(2):239–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Elhawary EA, Mostafa NM, Labib RM, Singab AN. Metabolomic profiles of essential oils from selected Rosa varieties and their antimicrobial activities. Plants. 2021;10(8):1721.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Batiha GE-S, Shaheen HM, Elhawary EA, Mostafa NM, Eldahshan OA, Sabatier J-M. Phytochemical constituents, folk medicinal uses, and biological activities of genus Angelica: a review. Molecules. 2022;28(1):267.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Singab ANB, Mostafa NM, Eldahshan OA, Ashour ML, Wink M. Profile of volatile components of hydrodistilled and extracted leaves of Jacaranda acutifolia and their antimicrobial activity against foodborne pathogens. Nat Prod CommuN. 2014;9(7):1934578X1400900731.

    Google Scholar 

  31. El-Nashar HA, Mostafa NM, El-Badry MA, Eldahshan OA, Singab ANB. Chemical composition, antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of essential oils from Schinus polygamus (cav.) cabrera leaf and bark grown in Egypt. Nat Prod Res. 2021;35(23):5369–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Miguel MG, Dandlen S, Figueiredo A, Barroso JG, Pedro LG, Duarte A, Faísca J. Essential oils of flowers of Citrus sinensis and Citrus clementina cultivated in Algarve, Portugal. Acta Hortic. 2008;773:89–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Salvatore MM, Nicoletti R, Andolfi A. Essential oils in citrus fruit ripening and postharvest quality. Horticulturae 2022, 8(5):396.

  34. González-Mas MC, Rambla JL, López-Gresa MP, Blázquez MA, Granell A. Volatile compounds in citrus essential oils: a comprehensive review. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Taha AM, Eldahshan OA. Chemical characteristics, antimicrobial, and cytotoxic activities of the essential oil of Egyptian Cinnamomum glanduliferum bark. Chem Biodivers. 2017;14(5):e1600443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Manzur M, Luciardi MC, Blázquez MA, Alberto MR, Cartagena E, Arena ME. Citrus sinensis essential oils an innovative antioxidant and antipathogenic dual strategy in food preservation against spoliage bacteria. Antioxidants. 2023;12(2):246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Fadilah NQ, Jittmittraphap A, Leaungwutiwong P, Pripdeevech P, Dhanushka D, Mahidol C, Ruchirawat S, Kittakoop P. Virucidal activity of essential oils from Citrus x aurantium L. against influenza a virus H1 N1: Limonene as a potential household disinfectant against virus. Nat Prod Commun. 2022;17(1):1934578X211072713.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ben Hsouna A, Ben Halima N, Smaoui S, Hamdi N. Citrus lemon essential oil: Chemical composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities with its preservative effect against Listeria monocytogenes inoculated in minced beef meat. Lip Health Dis. 2017;16:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hung Y-HR, Lin H-J, Lee E-C, Lu W-J, Lin Y-T, Huang B-B, Lin T-C, Lin H-TV. Effect of lemon essential oil on the microbial control, physicochemical properties, and aroma profiles of peeled shrimp. LWT 2023, 173:114340.

  40. Zhao C, Zhang Z, Nie D, Li Y. Protective effect of lemon essential oil and its major active component, D-limonene, on intestinal injury and inflammation of E. Coli-challenged mice. Front Nutr. 2022;9:843096.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Azab SS, Abdel Jaleel GA, Eldahshan OA. Anti-inflammatory and gastroprotective potential of leaf essential oil of Cinnamomum glanduliferum in ethanol-induced rat experimental gastritis. Pharma Biol. 2017;55(1):1654–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Todirascu-Ciornea E, El-Nashar HA, Mostafa NM, Eldahshan OA, Boiangiu RS, Dumitru G, Hritcu L, Singab ANB. Schinus terebinthifolius essential oil attenuates scopolamine-induced memory deficits via cholinergic modulation and antioxidant properties in a zebrafish model. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med 2019, 2019.

  43. Manjunath C, Mahurkar N. In vitro cytotoxicity of cardamom oil, lemon oil, and jasmine oil on human skin, gastric, and brain cancer cell line. J Cancer Res Ther. 2021;17(1):62–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Russo R, Corasaniti MT, Bagetta G, Morrone LA. Exploitation of cytotoxicity of some essential oils for translation in cancer therapy. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med 2015, 2015.

  45. Monajemi R, Oryan S, Haeri-Roohani A, Ghannadi A, Jafarian A. Cytotoxic effects of essential oils of some Iranian Citrus peels. Iran J Pharma Res. 2005;4(3):183–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Saengha W, Karirat T, Buranrat B, Katisart T, Ling N, Luang-In V. Cytotoxicity and antiproliferative activity of essential oils from lemon, wild orange and petitgrain against MCF-7, HepG2 and HeLa cancer cells. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj-Napoca. 2022;50(3):12713–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Mahato N, Sharma K, Koteswararao R, Sinha M, Baral E, Cho MH. Citrus essential oils: extraction, authentication and application in food preservation. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(4):611–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Maksoud S, Abdel-Massih RM, Rajha HN, Louka N, Chemat F, Barba FJ, Debs E. Citrus aurantium L. active constituents, biological effects and extraction methods. An updated review. Molecules 2021, 26(19):5832.

  49. Stratakos AC, Koidis A. Methods for extracting essential oils. Essential oils in food preservation, flavor and safety. edn.: Elsevier; 2016. pp. 31–8.

  50. Mohagheghniapour A, Saharkhiz MJ, Golmakani MT, Niakousari M. Variations in chemical compositions of essential oil from sour orange (Citrus aurantium L.) blossoms by different isolation methods. Sustain Chem Pharm. 2018;10:118–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Abdallah WE, Abdelmaksoud SI, Nazif NM, Abdelshafeek KA, Hebishy A, Abdelfattah MS. Comparative study of peels essential oil constituents of some Citrus species. Egypt J Chem. 2022;65(6):311–25.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Jha V, Risbud A, Kasbe S, Thube S, Preman G, Maiti S, Yadav H, Khan F, Shaikh F, Jain T. GC–MS analysis and investigation of bioactive potential of essential oil from Citrus aurantium var. Amara. J Pharm Chem Vol. 2022;8(3):24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Değirmenci H, Erkurt H. Relationship between volatile components, antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of the essential oil, hydrosol and extracts of Citrus aurantium L. flowers. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13(1):58–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Djenane D. Chemical profile, antibacterial and antioxidant activity of Algerian citrus essential oils and their application in Sardina pilchardus. Volume 4. Foods; 2015. pp. 208–28. 2.

  55. Quiroga PR, Asensio CM, Nepote V. Antioxidant effects of the monoterpenes carvacrol, thymol and sabinene hydrate on chemical and sensory stability of roasted sunflower seeds. J Sci Food Agric. 2015;95(3):471–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Tundis R, Loizzo MR, Bonesi M, Menichini F, Mastellone V, Colica C, Menichini F. Comparative study on the antioxidant capacity and cholinesterase inhibitory activity of Citrus aurantifolia Swingle, C. aurantium L., and C. Bergamia Risso and Poit. Peel essential oils. J Food Sci. 2012;77(1):H40–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Miyazawa M, Watanabe H, Kameoka H. Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase activity by monoterpenoids with ap-menthane skeleton. J Agric Food Chem. 1997;45(3):677–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Miyazawa M, Yamafuji C. Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase activity by tea tree oil and constituent terpenoids. Flavour Fragr J 2006, 21(2):198–201.

  59. Sawamura M, Kuriyama T. Quantitative determination of volatile constituents in the pummelo (Citrus grandis osbeck forma Tosa-buntan). J Agric Food chem. 1988;36(3):567–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Matsuura R, Ukeda H, Sawamura M. Tyrosinase inhibitory activity of citrus essential oils. J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54(6):2309–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Benayad O, Bouhrim M, Tiji S, Kharchoufa L, Addi M, Drouet S, Hano C, Lorenzo JM, Bendaha H, Bnouham M. Phytochemical profile, α-glucosidase, and α-amylase inhibition potential and toxicity evaluation of extracts from Citrus aurantium (L) peel, a valuable by-product from Northeastern Morocco. Biomolecules 2021;11(11):1555.

  62. Heydari Koochi Z, Jahromi KG, Kavoosi G, Babaei S. Citrus peel waste essential oil: Chemical composition along with anti-amylase and anti‐glucosidase potential. Int J Food Sci TechnoL. 2022;57(10):6795–804.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Aazza S, Lyoussi B, Miguel MG. Antioxidant and antiacetylcholinesterase activities of some commercial essential oils and their major compounds. Molecules. 2011;16(9):7672–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Mills C, Cleary BV, Walsh JJ, Gilmer JF. Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase by tea tree oil. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2004;56(3):375–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Rabie O, El-Nashar HA, Majrashi TA, Al-Warhi T, Hassab E, Eldehna MA, W. M., Mostafa NM. Chemical composition, seasonal variation and antiaging activities of essential oil from Callistemon subulatus leaves growing in Egypt. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2023;38(1):2224944. ISO 690.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Jelenkovic L, Jovanovic VS, Palic I, Mitic V, Radulovic M. In vitro screening of α-amylase inhibition by selected terpenes from essential oils. Trop J Pharm Res. 2014;13(9):1421–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Singh P, Jayaramaiah RH, Agawane SB, Vannuruswamy G, Korwar AM, Anand A, Giri AP. Potential dual role of eugenol in inhibiting advanced glycation end products in diabetes: proteomic and mechanistic insights. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):18798.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Amechrouq A, Aziz Ajana M, Bouachrine M, Lakhlifi T, Idrissi E, M., Choukrad M. Chemical composition and in silico acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of essential oils of six apiaceae species from South-East Morocco. Biointerface Res Appl Chem. 2023;13:36.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Bonesi, M., Menichini, F., Tundis, R., Loizzo, M. R., Conforti, F., Passalacqua, N. G., Menichini, F. Acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of Pinus species essential oils and their constituents. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2010;25(5):622–8.

  70. Fiocco D, Fiorentino D, Frabboni L, Benvenuti S, Orlandini G, Pellati F, Gallone A. Lavender and peppermint essential oils as effective mushroom tyrosinase inhibitors: a basic study. Flavour Fragr J. 2011;26(6):441–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Eawsakul K, Panichayupakaranant P, Ongtanasup T, Warinhomhoun S, Noonong K, Bunluepuech K. (2021). Computational study and in vitro alpha-glucosidase inhibitory effects of medicinal plants from a Thai folk remedy. Heliyon, 7(9).

  72. Baccouri B, Rajhi I. Potential antioxidant activity of terpenes. Terpenes and terpenoids-recent Advances 2021:53–62.

  73. Abd Rashed A, Abd Rahman AZ, Rathi DNG. Essential oils as a potential neuroprotective remedy for age-related neurodegenerative diseases: a review. Molecules 2021, 26(4):1107.

  74. Salakhutdinov NF, Volcho KP, Yarovaya OI. Monoterpenes as a renewable source of biologically active compounds. Pure Appl Chem 2017, 89(8):1105–17.

  75. Habtemariam S. Antidiabetic potential of monoterpenes: a case of small molecules punching above their weight. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;19(1):4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Al Kury LT, Abdoh A, Ikbariah K, Sadek B, Mahgoub M. In vitro and in vivo antidiabetic potential of monoterpenoids: an update. Molecules. 2021;27(1):182.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

not applicable.

Funding

Open access funding is provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Abbassia, Cairo, 11566, Egypt

    Esraa A. Elhawary & Omayma A. Eldahshan

  2. Department of Biology, Science Faculty, Selcuk University, Campus, Konya, Turkey

    Nilofar Nilofar & Gokhan Zengin

  3. Department of Pharmacy, Botanic Garden “Giardino dei Semplici”, Università degli Studi “Gabriele d’Annunzio”, via dei Vestini 31, Chieti, 66100, Italy

    Nilofar Nilofar

  4. Center for Drug Discovery Research and Development, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Abbassia, Cairo, 11566, Egypt

    Omayma A. Eldahshan

Authors
  1. Esraa A. Elhawary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nilofar Nilofar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gokhan Zengin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Omayma A. Eldahshan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Esraa A. Elhawary: Methodology, Writing original manuscript Nilofar Nilofar: writing original manuscript, Reviewing and editing Gokhan Zengin: Conceptualization, writing original manuscript Writing original manuscript, Reviewing and editingOmayma A. Eldahshan: Conceptualization, Writing original manuscript, Reviewing and editingAll the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omayma A. Eldahshan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elhawary, E.A., Nilofar, N., Zengin, G. et al. Variation of the essential oil components of Citrus aurantium leaves upon using different distillation techniques and evaluation of their antioxidant, antidiabetic, and neuroprotective effect against Alzheimer’s disease. BMC Complement Med Ther 24, 73 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-024-04380-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-024-04380-x

Keywords

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies

ISSN: 2662-7671

Contact us