Skip to main content

Microbial and heavy metal contamination in herbal medicine: a prospective study in the central region of Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Introduction

Herbal medicine is a medical system based on the utilization of plants or plant extracts for therapy. The continual increase in global consumption and the trade of herbal medicine has raised safety concerns in many regions. These concerns are mainly linked to microbial contamination, which could spread infections with multi-resistant bacteria in the community, and heavy metal contamination that may lead to cancers or internal organs’ toxicity.

Methods

This study was performed using an experimental design. A total of 47 samples, herbal medicine products sold in local stores in Qassim region, were used in the experiments. They were tested for bacterial contamination, alongside 32 samples for heavy metal analysis. Bacterial contamination was determined by the streak plate method and further processed to determine their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns using MicroScan WalkAway96 pulse; heavy metals were determined using a spectrometer instrument.

Results

A total of 58 microorganisms were isolated. All samples were found to be contaminated with at least one organism except three samples. The majority of the isolated bacterial species were gram negative bacteria, such as Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas spp. and E. coli., which could be of fecal origin and may lead to pneumonia, skin, or internal infections. Furthermore, most of the gram-positive bacteria were found to be multi-drug resistant. Moreover, for heavy metals, all samples had levels exceeding the regulatory limits.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated the presence of bacteria and heavy metals in samples of herbal medicines. Using these contaminated products may spread resistant infections, metal toxicities, or even cancers in the community.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) is defined as the use of different types of experience-based products or practices to treat or prevent diseases. It has been used for thousands of years [1] and is sometimes referred to as traditional medicine [2]. In the USA, CAM is commonly practiced by the population, with natural medicine being the most commonly used form [3]. In Saudi Arabia, herbal medicine and spiritual therapies are the most used forms of CAM [4]. In some reports, up to 94% of Saudi adults have used herbal medicine in their life [5].

As a non-conventional form of medicine, natural and herbal medicine products do not have studies to support their safety and regulate precise dosages. In addition, the collection, storage, and preparation of herbal medicine does not usually ensure strict safety and sterility regulations. As a result, herbal medicine may be exposed to microorganisms from the soil, water, inappropriate handling or storage practices and environmental factors during harvesting and storage such as rainfall or high humidity [6].

Heavy metal contamination is another serious risk of herbal medicine. Various industrial, agricultural, medical and technological applications have led to the tremendous distribution of heavy metals in the environment, including plants, soil and water. Several studies from different continents have shown that heavy metals are commonly found in herbal medicine products in concentrations exceeding the permitted limits [7]. These metals could be carcinogenic and may also lead to heart, lung, brain, and kidney toxicities [7].

In Saudi Arabia, over 80% of the studied population reported that they have used traditional recipes of herbal medicine [8]. These recipes could be in the form of orally taken products or topical creams/liquids. The use of CAM has been reported to be common among patients with difficult to treat conditions such as diabetes, cancers and allergies [9,10,11]. Herbal medicine products are usually made with non-sterile methods. Studies from different countries have already shown the microbial contamination of these products [12, 13]. Being commonly used in Saudi Arabia, this would lead to spread of serious infections and may carry huge risks on the public health if these are shown to be contaminated with serious bacteria.

Our study aims to identify the bacterial and heavy metal contamination in common herbal medicine products in the central region of Saudi Arabia.

Methods

Study design

This study was performed as experimental research to identify the bacterial and heavy metal contamination in complementary herbal medicine products sold in local stores at Qassim region, a central region in Saudi Arabia.

Study sample

For resources and time reasons, we followed a convenience sampling method and included all local stores of herbal complementary medicine in Qassim region. There are no statistics about number of products available in the region to calculate the needed sample size, so we decided to collect all readily available complementary herbal medicine products which include creams, liquids, and powders. All collected samples were analyzed in the laboratories of the College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University.

Sample processing and isolation

  • Isolation and Identification of Contaminating Bacteria was carried out as defined by Irfan et al. [14]:

The process started by weighing one gram (1 g) of the sample into a sterile Muller Hinton broth and mixed by vortex for 20s, before being incubated at 37 °C for 4 h to enhance microorganism growth. All of the samples were cultured onto Blood agar and MacConkey, streak plate method, and incubated at 37˚C for 24 h. Blood agar was used to grow a wide range of microorganisms and to detect hemolytic bacteria, while MacConkey agar was chosen to isolate gram-negative enteric bacteria and to differentiate bacteria based on their lactose metabolism. Initial identification was performed through colony morphology, gram-stain and biochemical tests.

  • Confirmatory identification and determination of antimicrobial susceptibility pattern:

All bacterial isolates were further analyzed using MicroScan WalkAway96 pulse for identification and the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern was determined. The MicroScan WalkAway96 pulse is an automated system which incubates microtiter identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing panels, interprets biochemical results using a photometric or fluorogenic reader and generates computerized reports. Any bacteria with resistance to more than one antibiotic from different classes was considered multi-drug resistant.

Evaluation of heavy metal contamination

Elemental analysis was carried out as explained by Zagui et al. [15]. ThermoFisher scientific ARL QUANT’X XRF spectrometer instrument model: AA83811 was used to detect the heavy metals in the selected samples. Thirty-two samples were tested for heavy metal contamination and seven heavy metals were analyzed (Chromium “Cr”, Copper “Cu”, Iron “Fe”, Lead “Pb”, Manganese “Mn”, Arsenic “As” and Zinc “Zn”). The selections of heavy metals was based on their frequent presence in herbal medicine and their toxicity to human health [2, 7].

One gram of each sample was placed in special cups inside the spectrometer chamber facing down toward the X-ray tube. X-rays from the X-ray tube penetrated the layers of the disk and excited the elements in the sample by ejecting inner orbital electrons from the atom by a process known as the photoelectric effect. As the excited atoms return to their ground state, they emit fluorescent X-ray photons with energies that are characteristic of each element in the sample. These X-ray photons are measured by a detector as a mass percentage (m/m%).

Data analysis plan

All of the collected data were updated and analyzed using to obtain the statistics, frequency, and percentages. Descriptive statistics were done using Microsoft Excel and the results were interpreted in tables using Microsoft Word, and charts using Microsoft Excel.

Results

A total of 47 samples were collected, including 18 creams, 15 liquids/lotions, and 14 powder products. Most of the products were meant to be applied topically on the skin. Forty four samples were found to be contaminated; only 3 samples did not grow any bacteria in the cultures (Table 1). Overall, 59 bacterial species were successfully isolated and identified (Fig. 1). Nine samples had staphylococcal bacteria (4 S. hominis, 3 S. auricularis, 1 S. haemolyticus and 1 S. schleiferi), and 7 had Pantoea agglomerans.

Table 1 Types of organism isolated from the tested samples of herbal medicine products
Fig. 1
figure 1

Frequency rate of bacterial isolates from herbal medicine products. Pantoea agglomerans was the most isolated bacteria (7 samples)

Antibiotic susceptibility testing was then done using the Microscan Walkaway system. This test included 23 different antibiotics. All isolated Staphylococcus spp. were found to be multi-drug resistant (MDR). Staphylococcus hominis was resistant to 10 different antibiotics including ampicillin, erythromycin, and clindamycin. All isolated gram-negative bacteria (42) were found to be multi-drug resistant except three samples, Citrobacter youngae, Cronobacter sakazakii complex, and Klebsiella ozaenae, which were resistant to only one antibiotic. Moreover, Enterobacter cloacae, Pantoea aggiomerans, and Stenotrophomonas maltophillia were found to be resistant to more than 15 different antibiotics including ceftolozane-tazobactam, piperacillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and nitrofurantoin.

Thirty-two samples were tested for heavy metal contamination and seven heavy metals were analyzed (Chromium “Cr”, Copper “Cu”, Iron “Fe”, Lead “Pb”, Manganese “Mn”, Arsenic “As” and Zinc “Zn”). All samples had high amounts of heavy metals (Table 2). Iron, manganese and zinc were detected in almost all of the tested samples. The least detected metal was chromium (2 samples) then Arsenic (3 samples).

Table 2 Heavy metals concentrations in the tested samples of herbal medicine products

Discussion

Herbal medicine is the most common form of complementary and alternative medicine. It is commonly used globally with an increasing industrial interest in the recent years. Over 60 billion USD is yearly spent on herbal medicine worldwide [2, 16]. The use of herbal medicine might be of medical or psychological benefit for consumers. However, if strict guidelines and scientific studies are missing, health risks are expected. These concerns are related to microbial and heavy metal contamination. The data from the present study suggest that herbal medicine products are potential sources of microbial contamination, including highly resistant bacteria and heavy metal contamination. The analyzed products included topical creams and powders.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that Delftia acidovorans, Streptococcus porcinus and Staphylococcus schleiferi have been isolated from herbal medicine products. This is alarming for public health as the increased human exposure to new bacteria may contribute to the emergence of new bacterial infections. This can be seen more in immunocompromised patients but also in healthy people [17]. In our study, most of the isolated bacterial species were gram negative bacteria, such as Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas spp. and Enterobacter spp., in addition to different species of Staphylococci. Comparable results were found in a recent study from Malawi [12]. It has been found that microbial load in herbal medicine products is influenced by the climate, the antimicrobial properties of the plant, the plant surface and the distance of the plant from the soil [13]. Additional post-harvesting, transportation, storage and mixing factors and hygiene should also play a role.

The most commonly isolated species in our study, Pantoea agglomerans, is a gram-negative bacillus that is usually found in fecal material, plants and soil. Walusansa et al. found that E. coli was the most commonly isolated genus, followed by both Salmonella spp. and Shigella spp., which might indicate fecal contamination [18]. In our study, several species of potentially fecal origin were isolated including E. coli, Pantoea agglomerans, Enterobacter cloacae and Escherichia hermannii. Due to the pathogens it carries, fecal contamination is source of several infectious conditions which could sometimes be fatal. This includes gastrointestinal infections, hepatitis, respiratory infections, and skin rashes [19].

The allowed limits in cosmetic products are not defined for most heavy metals; their concentrations are usually measured in parts per million (ppm). The U.S. FDA has defined maximum limits for lead (20 ppm) and arsenic (3 ppm) in cosmetic products, while chromium is allowed in cosmetic colorants in concentrations not exceeding 50 ppm [20]. Heavy metals were detected at very high concentrations in all of the tested samples. Chromium, lead and arsenic were found at levels higher than those defined by the U.S. FDA in 2, 2 and 3 samples, respectively. Iron, zinc and manganese were the predominant metals, but arsenic, lead, chromium and copper were also detected in some samples. The source of these metals could be natural, agricultural, or industrial. Although the concentrations found were surprisingly high, it has been shown that heavy metals are found in herbal products in concentrations much higher than those in synthetic products [21]. Asian herbal medicine products have also shown to contain heavy metals and drugs [22]. When ingested/absorbed, even at low levels, they can be of harm [7]. The long-term accumulation of these metals may lead to cancers, intellectual abnormalities, nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, cardiovascular, and skin toxicities [23]. In a recent study, even conventional cosmetic creams may have the same risks [14].

Although the Saudi national center for CAM has published strict regulations for its practice [24], these products were easily reachable through herbal stores or non-licensed traditional healers. The results of the current study show that surveillance might be insufficient. One of the reasons is that these herbal shops are licensed by the ministry of commerce without direct surveillance by the ministry of health or the Saudi FDA. Another more problematic reason is that these products are sometimes sold non officially and distributed in the public, away from the regulatory and surveillance bodies.

A main limitation of the study is that we collected samples from all Qassim region’s local stores. This convenience sampling method might not be well representative of the whole country. We did not have any statistics about number or types of herbal medicine in Saudi Arabia or Qassim region. Consequently, the sample size was not statistically calculated. Another limitation is that we did not replicate samples to ensure consistency of the results. Finally, herbal stores did not declare the ingredients of these mixtures, so, making a link between specific ingredients and the bacterial/metallic load was not possible. We encourage future studies to try to assess these links to have a clearer idea.

Conclusion

Our study shows the serious level of microbial and metallic contamination of herbal medicine products. What is more concerning is that the isolated bacteria were multi-drug resistant. This might be harmful to the public as it may spread rare and multi-drug bacteria among the local population. Metallic contamination may also lead to cancers and vital organs’ chronic toxicities leading to major health burden. We recommend that all countries should apply strict regulations and continuous surveillance on CAM to prevent malpractice. Joint committees between the ministry of health, the FDA, and the ministry of commerce might help monitoring this practice. Although they could be medically helpful, studies on the efficacy and safety of herbal products are scarce. We recommend financially supporting and encouraging studies on the efficacy and safety of the different CAM practices.

Data Availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Petrovska BB. Historical review of medicinal plants’ usage. Pharmacogn Rev. 2012;6(11):1–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Yuan H, Ma Q, Ye L, Piao G. The Traditional Medicine and Modern Medicine from Natural products. Molecules. 2016;21(5):E559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barnes PM, Bloom B, Nahin RL. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007. Natl Health Stat Report. 2008;(12):1–23.

  4. Farooqui M, Alreshidi H, Alkheraiji J, Abdulsalim S, Alshammari MS, Kassem L, et al. A cross-sectional Assessment of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among patients with chronic Diseases (CDs) in Qassim, Saudi Arabia. Healthc (Basel). 2022;10(9):1728.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alkhamaiseh SI, Aljofan M. Prevalence of use and reported side effects of herbal medicine among adults in Saudi Arabia. Complement Ther Med. 2020;48:102255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. de Sousa Lima CM, Fujishima MAT, de Paula Lima B, Mastroianni PC, de Sousa FFO, da Silva JO. Microbial contamination in herbal medicines: a serious health hazard to elderly consumers. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2020;20:17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Luo L, Wang B, Jiang J, Fitzgerald M, Huang Q, Yu Z, et al. Heavy Metal Contaminations in Herbal Medicines: determination, Comprehensive Risk assessments, and solutions. Front Pharmacol. 2021;11:595335.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Al Akeel MM, Al Ghamdi WM, Al Habib S, Koshm M, Al Otaibi F. Herbal medicines: Saudi population knowledge, attitude, and practice at a glance. J Family Med Prim Care. 2018;7(5):865–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Abuelgasim KA, Alsharhan Y, Alenzi T, Alhazzani A, Ali YZ, Jazieh AR. The use of complementary and alternative medicine by patients with cancer: a cross-sectional survey in Saudi Arabia. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018;18(1):88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Alsanad S, Aboushanab T, Khalil M, Alkhamees OA. A descriptive review of the prevalence and usage of traditional and complementary Medicine among Saudi Diabetic patients. Scientifica (Cairo). 2018;2018:6303190.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Koshak AE. Prevalence of herbal medicines in patients with chronic allergic disorders in Western Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2019;40(4):391–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kalumbi MH, Likongwe MC, Mponda J, Zimba BL, Phiri O, Lipenga T, et al. Bacterial and heavy metal contamination in selected commonly sold herbal medicine in Blantyre, Malawi. Malawi Med J. 2020;32(3):153–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kneifel W, Czech E, Kopp B. Microbial contamination of medicinal plants–a review. Planta Med. 2002;68(1):5–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Irfan M, Shafeeq A, Siddiq U, Bashir F, Ahmad T, Athar M, et al. A mechanistic approach for toxicity and risk assessment of heavy metals, hydroquinone and microorganisms in cosmetic creams. J Hazard Mater. 2022;433:128806.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zagui GS, Moreira NC, Santos DV, Darini ALC, Domingo JL, Segura-Muñoz SI, et al. High occurrence of heavy metal tolerance genes in bacteria isolated from wastewater: a new concern? Environ Res. 2021;196:110352.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Barkat MA, Goyal A, Barkat HA, Salauddin M, Pottoo FH, Anwer ET. Herbal Medicine: Clinical Perspective and Regulatory Status. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2021;24(10):1573–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vouga M, Greub G. Emerging bacterial pathogens: the past and beyond. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(1):12–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Walusansa A, Asiimwe S, Kafeero HM, Stanley IJ, Ssenku JE, Nakavuma JL, et al. Prevalence and dynamics of clinically significant bacterial contaminants in herbal medicines sold in East Africa from 2000 to 2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop Med Health. 2021;49(1):10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Thomas GA, Paradell Gil T, MĂĽller CT, Rogers HJ, Berger CN. From field to plate: how do bacterial enteric pathogens interact with ready-to-eat fruit and vegetables, causing Disease outbreaks? Food Microbiol. 2024;117:104389.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nutrition C for, FS. and A. FDA’s Testing of Cosmetics for Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Cobalt, Lead, Mercury, and Nickel Content. FDA [Internet]. 2022 Mar 3 [cited 2023 Apr 8]; Available from: https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/potential-contaminants-cosmetics/fdas-testing-cosmetics-arsenic-cadmium-chromium-cobalt-lead-mercury-and-nickel-content.

  21. Morshed AJM. Quantification of heavy metals in the various Branded Face Wash available in the Bangladeshi markets. Int J Sci Technol Res. 2017;6(10):295–7.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ernst E. Toxic heavy metals and undeclared Drugs in Asian herbal medicines. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2002;23(3):136–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mitra S, Chakraborty AJ, Tareq AM, Emran TB, Nainu F, Khusro A, et al. Impact of heavy metals on the environment and human health: novel therapeutic insights to counter the toxicity. J King Saud Univ - Sci. 2022;34(3):101865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Aboushanab T, Baslom S. A new official national regulations for complementary medicine practices in Saudi Arabia. Integr Med Res. 2021;10(2):100472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Researchers would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research, Qassim University for funding the publication of this project.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SFA, AIA and MAA reviewed the literature, collected and coded the samples, and were responsible for recording the results. AHM, AMA and KSA were responsible for the design, microbiological cultures and their reading. MI analyzed heavy metals and participated in the writing of the manuscript. AMB and AA participated in collecting and presenting the results, writing the manuscript including results and discussion sections.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azzam Alkhalifah.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not Applicable.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alharbi, S.F., Althbah, A.I., Mohammed, A.H. et al. Microbial and heavy metal contamination in herbal medicine: a prospective study in the central region of Saudi Arabia. BMC Complement Med Ther 24, 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04307-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04307-y

Keywords