Skip to main content

Impact of the practice of touch-massage® by a nurse on the anxiety of patients with hematological disorders hospitalized in a sterile environment, a randomized, controlled study

Abstract

Context

In addition to curative care, supportive care is beneficial in managing the anxiety symptoms common in patients in sterile hematology unit. We hypothesize that personal massage can help the patient, particularly in this isolated setting where physical contact is extremely limited. The main objective of this study was to show that anxiety could be reduced after a touch-massage® performed by a nurse trained in this therapy.

Methods

A single-center, randomized, unblinded controlled study in the sterile hematology unit of a French university hospital, validated by an ethics committee. The patients, aged between 18 and 65 years old, and suffering from a serious and progressive hematological pathology, were hospitalized in sterile hematology unit for a minimum of three weeks, patients were randomized into either a group receiving 15-minute touch-massage® sessions or a control group receiving an equivalent amount of quiet time once a week for three weeks. In the treated group, anxiety was assessed before and after each touch-massage® session, using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory questionnaire with subscale state (STAI-State). In the control group, anxiety was assessed before and after a 15-minute quiet period. For each patient, the difference in the STAI-State score before and after each session (or period) was calculated, the primary endpoint was based on the average of these three differences. Each patient completed the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Questionnaire before the first session and after the last session.

Results

Sixty-two patients were randomized. Touch-massage® significantly decreased patient anxiety: a mean decrease in STAI-State scale score of 10.6 [7.65–13.54] was obtained for the massage group (p ≤ 0.001) compared with the control group. The improvement in self-esteem score was not significant.

Conclusion

This study provides convincing evidence for integrating touch-massage® in the treatment of patients in sterile hematology unit.

Trial registration

NCT02343965.

Peer Review reports

Background

Many studies have been carried out on the considerable anxiety [1] frequently observed in patients undergoing cancer treatment, as well as the impact of treatment on the quality of life [2] of patients or on the subsequent development of depression [1] and Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms [3]. The alteration of self-esteem, particularly during chemotherapy, leading to numerous physical changes, has also been reported [4] and need to be considered [5].

The recent diagnosis of a serious and progressive hematological disease leads the patient to rapid hospital care, due to the urgency of the treatment. In a few hours or days, the patient may go from being a “healthy individual” to being a “seriously ill patient”. Because of the strict hygiene rules, hospitalization in protective isolation means that the patient must discard all personal effects for a significant period of time (25 days on average), while in a small room (8 m² in our unit).

Physical changes, especially during the first hospitalization, are often very significant (alopecia, weight loss, paleness, muscle wasting, skin disorders, etc.). In sterile hematology unit, isolation and, more particularly, the reduction in the number of sensations related to touch, constitute an even more singular context. Everyday life and habits are totally modified (sleeping habits, diet, physical activity, etc.). Physical contact between the patient and their family is very rarely allowed. In this context of hospitalization in a protective environment, the sensations linked to the sense of touch that the patient experiences primarily concern medical treatment, which is invasive for the most part (re-dressing, blood tests, etc.). This daily care is mainly carried out by nurses who are in the front line of the organisation of supportive care initiatives against anxiety.

These circumstances explain the importance for the patient to “stay in touch” with his environment as much as possible [6, 7], and touch-massages® constitute an approach to the patient as a whole, which is not focused exclusively on treating their disease [8,9,10,11]. Touch-massages® sessions include a physical and relational dimension that allows the patient to relax and feel reassured, constituting a complementary approach to the medical treatment. Touch-massages® should be adapted to the patient when first taken into care, considering both their overall health, and specific needs at the time of treatment.

Various studies have demonstrated value of massage therapy in improving body representation [12], the vivacity of the sensorimotor system [13]. These different actions could have a positive impact on anxiety and self-representation. Moreover, Diego and Field have shown a positive action on cortisol levels in healthy subjects, marking a decrease in anxiety [14] .

Publications have studied specifically the impact of touch-massage® nursing on different symptoms such as pain or anxiety, in many specialties such as geriatrics [15], cardiology [16], including in intensive care units [17, 18], in oncology [19], and notably in the context of chemotherapy-related fatigue [20]. But these publications remain rare, particularly in terms of randomized controlled studies, whereas this practice is widespread in all sectors of health care.

We therefore wished to measure the impact of touch-massage® on the anxiety and self-esteem of patients with severe hematological pathologies, hospitalized in sterile hematology unit, in comparison with patients benefiting from a quiet time, thanks to the first randomized controlled study carried out in this specific context.

Methods

Study design and participants

We conducted a randomized controlled study with an experimental group (receiving touch-massage® nursing) and a control group (receiving quiet time). The primary endpoint was based on the mean difference in the Anxiety-Status score before and after each session. The impact of the massage sessions on self-esteem was the secondary endpoint.

Sample

All patients hospitalized in the sterile hematology unit of a University Hospital between January and December 2015 and who met the eligibility criteria for participation in the study were invited to participate in the research.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria concerned patients with hematological diseases (leukemia, myeloma, lymphoma) hospitalized in a sterile hematology unit for at least 3 weeks, aged 18 to 65 years, female or male, who had never had nurse touch-massage® care.

Exclusion criteria

The exclusion criteria concerned patients with an allergy to sweet almond oil, skin lesions on the back and/or arms and/or hands, cognitive and/or psychiatric disorders preventing responses to the interviews and/or questionnaires, and the physical impossibility to remain in a sitting position on an ergonomic chair for the touch-massage® .

The interventions - massage group and control group

Touch-massage® group

Each patient in the massage group received three sessions of touch-massage® over a 3-week period (one session of 15 min per week) by the same nurse trained in touch-massage®, in the calm of the patient’s room.

The massage was performed directly in contact with the skin, using sterile massage oil. The patient was installed on an ergonomic chair to promote the comfort of both the patient and the nurse.

Each massage took place according to a previously established protocol, consisting of a massage of the back, arms and scalp (in Supplementary Material 1). The touch-massage® includes gentle, gliding, and enveloping motions, with alternating rhythms. The three nurses in this study had previously been trained in touch-massage® (175 h of training) [8, 9].

Control group

The participants of the control group were invited to have a quiet time sitting on an ergonomic chair in their room without being disturbed, for the same duration and frequency as the patients included in the touch-massage® group; one period of 15 min per week for 3 weeks.

Randomization

Randomization between the two groups was 1:1, using a software (Capture system ®) without stratification.

Outcomes

The following data were collected in order to describe the two group samples: sex, age, hematological pathology, and first hospitalization or not in a protected sector. Each patient completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) validated in French [21, 22] in order to evaluate primarily the predisposition of each subject to anxiety (anxiety-trait subscale STAI-T). It is a self-report questionnaire aimed at studying the anxiety-trait STAI-T (personality trait of the patient, their usual anxiety). It consists of 20 questions, all items are rated on a 4-point scale. The patient assigns a score to each question. The scores range from 20 to 80. The higher the score, the greater the anxiety personality trait. The results can be categorized as follows: very high anxiety (score > 65), high (score between 56 and 65), medium (score between 46 and 55), low (score between 36 and 45), very low (score < or equal to 35).

Primary endpoint: changes in anxiety before and after each session

In the treated group, anxiety was assessed one hour before and one hour after each touch-massage® session, using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [21], a self-report questionnaire designed to study anxiety-state (anxiety at a given moment) by anxiety-state subscale STAI-State. It is composed of 20 questions, for each item is rated on a 4-point scale. The patient assigns a score to each question. The scores range from 20 to 80. The higher the score, the greater the anxiety. The results can be categorized as follows: very high anxiety > 65, high from 56 to 65, average from 46 to 55, low: from 36 to 45, very low < or = 35.

In the control group, anxiety was assessed in the same way before and after a 15-minute quiet period.

For each patient, the difference in the STAI-State score before and after each massage session (or quiet period) was calculated.

Secondary endpoints: self-esteem

Each patient completed the self-esteem questionnaire before the first touch-massage® session and after the last touch-massage® session. The impact of the touch-massage® sessions on self-esteem was assessed by the difference in the overall score on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale [23]. This is a self-report questionnaire composed of 10 items, rated from 1 to 4. The scores vary from 10 to 40. The higher the score, the higher the self-esteem.

Number of subjects required and statistical methods

As no study on the evaluation of this therapy in the context of this pathology has been published, we relied on internal data for this study. We sought a decrease in the STAI-State score after one massage session of 8.8 points with a standard deviation of 2. We wished to demonstrate a difference between the two groups of 8 points. With alpha and beta risk set at 5% and 20%, 58 patients were needed. In order to guarantee the power of the study, a total of 62 patients were recruited.

All analyses were performed on the intention-to-treat population. They were completed by a per protocol analysis.

The difference in score at each session was modeled using a linear mixed model taking into account the group effect (“touch-massage® " vs. “no massage”), time (i.e. session), and time/group interaction. A random patient effect was also taken into account given the repetitive nature of the data. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Questionnaire score was compared using a linear model based on the score measured at baseline.

Analyses were performed using R software version 3.5.1.

Ethic

The trial was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki 1996. All patients provided written informed consent. The study was approved by the Comité de Protection des Personness OUEST IV Nantes (decision n°518/2014). The trial was registered : Trial registration NCT02343965 (22/01/2015).

Results

Patient characteristics and study flow diagram

All eligible patients were recruited (Fig. 1), once randomized, they all had the three sessions of either massage or quiet time. We had 3 premature discharges (after S2) in the massage group and 1 premature discharge (after S1) for the no massage group due to discharge from the protected sector. Data losses were as follows: in the massage group, 3 patients did not attend session 2, and in the massage group 2 patients did not attend session 2, and one questionnaire was incomplete (S3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study flow diagram

The majority of patients were men with leukemia, a little more than half of whom had already been hospitalized in a protected sector. The average anxiety score was 43.4, corresponding to patients with an anxious personality considered to be of low intensity (Table 1). No significant inconveniences or undesired effects in each group were reported.

Table 1 Patient Characteristics

Efficacy in relation to primary outcome: change in anxiety status

Table 2 Mean difference in anxiety-status score in intention-to-treat and per protocol

The improvement in patient state anxiety score was statistically significant in the treatment group compared to the control group: a mean score decrease of 10.6 [7.6–13.5] on the Spielberger State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-State) was obtained for the massage group (p ≤ 0.001) (Table 2).

There was a clear decrease in anxiety after each touch-massage® session (Fig. 2; Table 3), with a change in categorization of anxiety level for the massage group in contrast to the control group.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Changes in anxiety scores before and after each of the three sessions (S1,S2,S3)

Table 3 Changes in anxiety scores before and after each of the three sessions (S1,S2,S3)

Secondary endpoints: self-esteem

Table 4 Assessment of self-esteem by patients

The improvement in self-esteem score was not significant (Table 4) in the treated group compared with the control group, although patients reported in interviews the importance of massage in maintaining self-esteem.

Discussion

The results of our study show that the touch-massage® intervention by a trained nurse significantly reduces the intensity of anxiety in patients hospitalized in a protected hematology unit. We were unable to demonstrate an impact on self-esteem.

Comparison with the literature

In bone marrow transplantation [24] and oncology [25], it is important to know more about supportive care, which has been proven to improve the difficult experience of these hospitalizations and to improve patient symptoms.

The results of our study are in line with those carried out in the general population where this therapy has also helped to improve patient anxiety and stress [14, 26, 27] ,allowing for a reduction in the use of healthcare services [18, 28].

Our study confirms and reinforces the results of different studies of lesser quality carried out specifically in these hospitalization sectors and in this very specific population. A small study showed a decrease in cortisol and prolactin (known to increase under stressful conditions) [26] but these results are debated [29]. A controlled feasibility study on 20 patients [30] and an uncontrolled pilot study [31] showed a decrease in various symptoms including anxiety. Two other studies have been carried out in adults [32] and in pediatrics [33] without significant results (but with small samples) despite qualitative interview data underlining the positive experience of this care [34]. More recently, a retrospective study published in 2023 highlighted that this therapy seems to reduce acute pain, stress and anxiety, among patients in acute hematological and/or oncological situations [35].

As part of a more comprehensive approach, this therapy could also be offered to a patient’s relatives. This aspect was considered in a study in 2002 [36], and the results showed a significant decrease in anxiety scores, depression and general fatigue concerning the massage group.

Moreover, it may be beneficial to study the effect of massage on caregivers in these hospital units who are themselves subject to intense stress [37, 38].

In the same vein, the massage training of patients’ relatives could be envisaged, as suggested by the results of a study carried out on the caregivers of American veterans [39].

Apart from the impact on anxiety, this therapy could have other benefits for the patient such as cognitive and self-image improvements [12, 13] even if we were unable to demonstrate an impact on self-esteem. Pilot studies have shown in other populations an action on the immune system, which could be of interest in the context of bone marrow transplantation [40,41,42]. Other studies have highlighted effects on other physical or psychological symptoms such as pain, mood and fatigue in patients with metastatic or non-metastatic cancer, in both survivors and those in palliative care [43,44,45].

Finally, it could also be beneficial to evaluate if the effect of massage on anxiety persists over time and if it enables the occurrence of other symptoms during hospitalization and afterwards to be reduced (or even be prevented). For example, El-Jawahri [46], has shown the value of integrating palliative care with transplant care, which improves the symptoms of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder six months after transplantation. The reduction of the burden of symptoms and anxiety during transplantation partly explains the effect of this type of intervention.

Limitations of the study

This is a single-center, unblinded study. Blindness being a recurrent problem in massage therapies, the use of a questionnaire allows to standardize the evaluation measure. Another limitation of this study is the choice of the right dose-response. few studies have investigated the right dosage of massage to obtain effects. A recent study has, however, looked at these effects on a population with similar objectives [47]. Future studies should clarify this question.

It was not possible to evaluate the drug and non-drug treatments concomitant with the protocol. Treatments with anxiolytic objectives could have had an impact on the results, even if randomization made it possible to reduce this risk.

Furthermore, although the decrease in anxiety of the hospitalized patients was significant in the massage group, the impact on self-esteem was not significant, possibly because the number of patients was too small to show a significant result on this criterion.

Strengths of the study

To our knowledge, this is the first and only randomized controlled study evaluating the value of touch-massage® in the protected haematology sector, which shows a significant impact of this non-medicinal intervention on the reduction of anxiety in patients. Its implementation is simple, carried out by a major player in these services, but requires a change of point of view on physical contact to be developed in the protected hematology sector, where contact is reduced to a strict minimum [7]. In this pragmatic study, three nurses were trained to perform the touch-massage®, which was standardized in order to avoid an effect related to each nurse’s own practice. Moreover, we were able to enroll the necessary number of subjects, which is often complicated in these fragile populations and in this type of study [48].

Conclusion

This research provides evidence for caregivers to integrate touch-massage® into the nursing procedures to be proposed to patients in the context of isolation experienced in sterile hematology unit. We know that the reduction of psychological symptoms during this type of hospitalization can reduce long-term psychological complications [46].

The organization and training of nurses in complementary therapies such as touch-massage® remains to be established in sectors with numerous technical medical procedures.

The care for the relatives of these patients, and even the implementation of massages by the caregivers, are also other avenues for reflection.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. El-Jawahri AR, Traeger LN, Kuzmuk K, Eusebio JR, Vandusen HB, Shin JA, et al. Quality of life and mood of patients and family caregivers during hospitalization for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Cancer. 2015;121(6):951–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen MZ, Rozmus CL, Mendoza TR, Padhye NS, Neumann J, Gning I et al. Symptoms and Quality of Life in Diverse Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. J Pain Symptom Manage [Internet]. 2012 Aug [cited 2023 Nov 20];44(2):168–80. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4270122/.

  3. Fenech AL, Van Benschoten O, Jagielo AD, Ufere NN, Topping CEW, Clay M, et al. Post-traumatic stress symptoms in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Transpl Cell Ther. 2021;27(4):341e1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Münstedt K, Manthey N, Sachsse S, Vahrson H. Changes in self-concept and body image during alopecia induced cancer chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer off J Multinatl Assoc Support Care Cancer. 1997;5(2):139–43.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Niveau N, New B, Beaudoin M. How should Self-Esteem be considered in Cancer patients? Front Psychol. 2021;12:763900.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bevans MF, Mitchell SA, Marden S. The symptom experience in the first 100 days following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Support Care Cancer off J Multinatl Assoc Support Care Cancer. 2008;16(11):1243–54.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gaskill D, Henderson A, Fraser M. Exploring the everyday world of the patient in isolation. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1997;24(4):695–700.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Simon A. [Reclaiming the body through touch-relaxation massage]. Rev Infirm. 2012;(181):40–1.

  9. Lambert V. [The touch-massage; a technique for comfort]. Soins Rev Ref Infirm. 1997;(615):41–3.

  10. Galic S. [Touch-Massage®, an original approach in psychiatric nursing homes]. Soins Psychiatr. 2022;43(339):35–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Huet C. [Touch-Massage® care in support of the helping relationship in child psychiatry]. Soins Psychiatr. 2022;43(339):39–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sliz D, Smith A, Wiebking C, Northoff G, Hayley S. Neural correlates of a single-session massage treatment. Brain Imaging Behav. 2012;6(1):77–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rulleau T, Toussaint L. Massage can (re-)activate the lower limb sensorimotor representation of older adult inpatients. Psychol Aging. 2018;33(5):832–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Diego MA, Field T. Moderate pressure massage elicits a parasympathetic nervous system response. Int J Neurosci. 2009;119(5):630–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yücel ŞÇ, Arslan GG, Bagci H. Effects of Hand Massage and therapeutic touch on comfort and anxiety living in a Nursing Home in Turkey: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Relig Health. 2020;59(1):351–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson PG, Cutshall SM. Massage therapy: a comfort intervention for cardiac Surgery patients. Clin Nurse Spec CNS. 2007;21(3):161–5. quiz 166–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cox C, Hayes J. Experiences of administering and receiving therapeutic touch in intensive care. Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery. 1998;4(5):128–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cox CL, Hayes JA. Reducing anxiety: the employment of therapeutic touch as a nursing intervention. Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery. 1997;3(6):163–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ernst E. Massage therapy for cancer palliation and supportive care: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials. Support Care Cancer off J Multinatl Assoc Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(4):333–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Alizadeh J, Yeganeh MR, Pouralizadeh M, Roushan ZA, Gharib C, Khoshamouz S. The effect of massage therapy on fatigue after chemotherapy in gastrointestinal cancer patients. Support Care Cancer off J Multinatl Assoc Support Care Cancer. 2021;29(12):7307–14.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (form Y). Palo Alto, California; 1983.

  22. Langevin V, François M, Boini S, Riou A. Inventaire d’anxiété État-Trait Forme Y. Réf En Santé Au Trav [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2016 Apr 13];131:161–4. Available from: http://www.rst-sante-travail.fr/rst/pages-article/ArticleRST.html?ref=RST.FRPS%2027.

  23. Rosenberg M. Rosenberg self-esteem scale. J Relig Health. 1965.

  24. Lee SJ, Astigarraga CC, Eapen M, Artz AS, Davies SM, Champlin R, et al. Variation in supportive care practices in hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant J Am Soc Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14(11):1231–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shin ES, Seo KH, Lee SH, Jang JE, Jung YM, Kim MJ et al. Massage with or without aromatherapy for symptom relief in people with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(6):CD009873.

  26. Stringer J, Swindell R, Dennis M. Massage in patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy reduces serum cortisol and prolactin. Psychooncology. 2008;17(10):1024–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Miri S, Hosseini SJ, Ghorbani Vajargah P, Firooz M, Takasi P, Mollaei A, et al. Effects of massage therapy on pain and anxiety intensity in patients with Burns: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2023;20(6):2440–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Hanley J, Stirling P, Brown C. Randomised controlled trial of therapeutic massage in the management of stress. Br J Gen Pract J R Coll Gen Pract. 2003;53(486):20–5.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Moyer CA, Seefeldt L, Mann ES, Jackley LM. Does massage therapy reduce cortisol? A comprehensive quantitative review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2011;15(1):3–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor AG, Snyder AE, Anderson JG, Brown CJ, Densmore JJ, Bourguignon C. Gentle Massage improves Disease- and treatment-related symptoms in patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia. J Clin Trials. 2014;4:1000161.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kuon C, Wannier R, Harrison J, Tague C. Massage for Symptom Management in Adult inpatients with Hematologic malignancies. Glob Adv Health Med. 2019;8:2164956119849390.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Smith MC, Reeder F, Daniel L, Baramee J, Hagman J. Outcomes of touch therapies during bone marrow transplant. Altern Ther Health Med. 2003;9(1):40–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mehling WE, Lown EA, Dvorak CC, Cowan MJ, Horn BN, Dunn EA, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplant and use of massage for improved symptom management: results from a pilot randomized control trial. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med ECAM. 2012;2012:450150.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ackerman SL, Lown EA, Dvorak CC, Dunn EA, Abrams DI, Horn BN, et al. Massage for children undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation: a qualitative report. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med ECAM. 2012;2012:792042.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rodgers-Melnick SN, Bartolovich M, Desai NJ, Vasanna SH, Rivard RL, Owusu-Ansah A et al. Massage therapy for children, adolescents, and young adults: clinical delivery and effectiveness in hematology and oncology. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023;e30243.

  36. Rexilius SJ, Mundt C, Erickson Megel M, Agrawal S. Therapeutic effects of massage therapy and handling touch on caregivers of patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002;29(3):E35–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bannier C, Sachot C, Simon A. [Massage and sophrology workshops for haematology professionals]. Rev Infirm. 2014;(200):31–3.

  38. Nightingale L, Stringer J. Complementary therapy for carers on a transplant unit. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2013;19(3):119–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kozak L, Vig E, Simons C, Eugenio E, Collinge W, Chapko M. A feasibility study of caregiver-provided massage as supportive care for veterans with cancer. J Support Oncol. 2013;11(3):133–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Caudell KA. Psychoneuroimmunology and innovative behavioral interventions in patients with Leukemia. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996;23(3):493–502.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Rapaport MH, Schettler P, Bresee C. A preliminary study of the effects of repeated massage on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal and immune function in healthy individuals: a study of mechanisms of action and dosage. J Altern Complement Med N Y N. 2012;18(8):789–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sornkayasit K, Jumnainsong A, Phoksawat W, Eungpinichpong W, Leelayuwat C. Traditional Thai massage promoted immunity in the Elderly via attenuation of senescent CD4 + T cell subsets: a randomized crossover study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(6):3210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Falkensteiner M, Mantovan F, Müller I, Them C. The use of massage therapy for reducing pain, anxiety, and depression in oncological palliative care patients: a narrative review of the literature. ISRN Nurs. 2011;2011:929868.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Jane SW, Chen SL, Wilkie DJ, Lin YC, Foreman SW, Beaton RD, et al. Effects of massage on pain, mood status, relaxation, and sleep in Taiwanese patients with metastatic bone pain: a randomized clinical trial. Pain. 2011;152(10):2432–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kinkead B, Schettler PJ, Larson ER, Carroll D, Sharenko M, Nettles J et al. Massage therapy decreases cancer-related fatigue: results from a randomized early phase trial. Cancer 2018 01;124(3):546–54.

  46. El-Jawahri A, Traeger L, Greer JA, VanDusen H, Fishman SR, LeBlanc TW, et al. Effect of Inpatient Palliative Care during hematopoietic stem-cell transplant on psychological distress 6 months after transplant: results of a Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2017;35(32):3714–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Miladinia M, Jahangiri M, Kennedy AB, Fagerström C, Tuvesson H, Safavi SS, et al. Determining massage dose-response to improve cancer-related symptom cluster of pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbance: a 7-arm randomized trial in palliative cancer care. Palliat Med. 2023;37(1):108–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kutner J, Smith M, Mellis K, Felton S, Yamashita T, Corbin L. Methodological challenges in conducting a multi-site randomized clinical trial of massage therapy in hospice. J Palliat Med. 2010;13(6):739–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Philippe Moreau, professor of hematology, as well as the medical and nursing teams of the Hematology Unit. The authors also thank the patients who participated in the study for their trust, as well as Mrs. Karine Fajoles (Clinical Research Associate), Mrs. Laurence Gautier, Sylvie Colin and Brigitte Moreau (nurses), Mrs. Hélène Lecompte (Sociologist), for their involvement throughout this research.

Warm thanks to the association «Leucémie Espoir Atlantique Famille », and in particular to Mr. Louis-Marie Parant, President of the Association.

Funding

This investigation was supported by a special grant for nursing research from the CHU de Nantes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AS was responsible for study design, PL was responsible for data analysis and AE for manuscript preparation. JJN, PC, SG and TR assisted manuscript preparation and supervised the study. AE acts as the guarantor and accepts full responsibility for the work and/or the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrien Evin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The trial was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki 1996. All patients provided written informed consent. The study was approved by the Comité de Protection des Personness OUEST IV Nantes (decision n°518/2014). The trial was registered. Trial registration: NCT02343965.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Simon, A., Nizard, JJ., Chevalier, P. et al. Impact of the practice of touch-massage® by a nurse on the anxiety of patients with hematological disorders hospitalized in a sterile environment, a randomized, controlled study. BMC Complement Med Ther 24, 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04302-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04302-3

Keywords