Skip to main content

Bangpungtongsung-san for patients with major depressive disorder: study protocol for a randomized controlled phase II clinical trial



Bangpungtongsung-san (BTS) is a representative herbal medicine that has been widely used for patients with obesity in east Asian countries. Various preclinical studies have demonstrated the anti-depressive effect of BTS granules in various animal models of depression. This phase II trial aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of BTS in human patients with depression.


A total of 126 patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder and who are not underweight (body mass index ≥ 18.5 kg/m2) will be enrolled in this study. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated into three groups: the high-dose BTS, low-dose BTS, and placebo groups in a 1:1:1 ratio. BTS or placebo granules will be orally administered twice a day for 8 weeks. The BTS and placebo granules will be made to have identical color, scent, and shape, and participants and investigators will be blinded to the allocation. The primary efficacy endpoint is the change from baseline of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale total score at 8 weeks. The superiority of the high- and low-dose BTS granules to the placebo granules will be tested.


The results of this clinical trial will provide evidence on the efficacy and safety of BTS for patients with major depressive disorder. This study will be conducted in accordance with ethical and regulatory guidelines, and the results will be submitted and published in international peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration

CRIS registration Number: KCT0007571; registered on 2022/07/26 (

Peer Review reports


Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common mental disorder whose estimated global prevalence after the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic is 3,153 cases per 100,000 population [1]. One of the most critical problems of MDD is its repeated relapse and recurrence, with a recurrence rate of 50% and 85% in 6 months and 10 years, respectively [2]. Most patients with MDD experience repetitive episodes and undergo chronic progress. The etiology of MDD comprises severe social problems, such as suicide, which is the fifth leading cause of death in Korea [3], or a negative perception of the disease, which results in a passive approach to receiving treatment [4]. Another problem is the high discontinuation rate of antidepressant treatment; 43.5% of patients with MDD discontinue treatment at 6 weeks [5]. Accordingly, a new drug for depression with few side effects and a low risk of drug dependence is necessary.

Patients with MDD share a concomitance of depressed mood and lethargy. However, symptoms of changes in sleep and appetite occur differently among patients with MDD [6]. These symptoms can be divided into melancholic depression, atypical depression, anxious depression, and a mix of the aforementioned manifestations [7]. Atypical depression is characterized by mood reactivity and at least two of the following symptoms: increased appetite or weight gain, hypersomnia, leaden paralysis, and interpersonal rejection sensitivity [8]. In literature, atypical depression is defined according to two symptoms–increased appetite/weight gain and hypersomnia [9]. In the UK Biobank Mental Health Survey, atypical depression showed earlier onset, more recurrent episodes, and higher severity. Patients with atypical depression had higher rates of comorbid obesity, cardiovascular disease, and metabolic syndrome [9]. According to a meta-analysis of anthropometric studies on subtypes of depression, the atypical depression group showed 2.55 times higher body mass index (BMI) than the typical depression group [10]. These epidemiological traits imply that an approach different than that for typical depression should be used for atypical depression, considering its comorbidity and progress. As one of the major differences in mechanism between atypical and melancholic depression is increased inflammation shown by increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines and C-reactive protein [11], a novel medicine should be suggested for patients with atypical depression.

Bangpungtongseong-san (BTS) is one of the most used formulas in traditional east Asian medicine and has been widely sold as an over-the-counter drug for weight control in Korea [12]. In Korea, about 40 products containing BTS extract have been approved as over-the-counter drugs by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. The approved indications for BTS extract are accompanying symptoms of hypertension (palpitations, stiff shoulders, and flushing), obesity, swelling, and constipation. The novel efficacies of BTS other than those described in traditional medical bibliographies are being continuously unveiled through clinical and preclinical studies. BTS has been reported to be efficient in various diseases, ranging from metabolic diseases, such as hypertension, lipid abnormalities, and diabetes, to skin diseases, such as herpes zoster, chronic urticaria, and inflammatory dermatitis [13]. Accordingly, BTS is considered to have the potential for its indications to be expanded to other metabolic and inflammatory diseases. Furthermore, the antidepressant and anti-neuroinflammatory effects of BTS extract were found in in vivo and in vitro studies [14].

This clinical trial aimed to test the efficacy of BTS for patients with MDD in a human study. Particularly, considering the characteristics of BTS, which has been widely used for obesity, we plan to include normal-weight or overweight patients with MDD, excluding those who are underweight. Several clinical trials on BTS in obese patients have demonstrated positive results [15,16,17]. Moreover, we identified that BTS extract is a herbal medicine that shows a high expression of anti-depressant-like effects among the approved herbal medicine products in Korea [14]. Accordingly, we plan to study BTS as an effective alternative for patients with MDD who are over normal weight, have an excessive appetite, and suffer from weight gain.

The main objective of this phase II trial is to find the appropriate dose of BTS granules in patients with MDD for a further confirmative phase III trial. The primary efficacy endpoint is the change from baseline of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) total score at 8 weeks. The mean difference of the primary efficacy endpoint will be compared between the high-dose and low-dose BTS groups and the placebo group. If either two doses of BTS show superiority over the placebo, a further confirmative phase III trial will be planned. The secondary efficacy endpoints include the response and remission rate of depression, as defined by the 17-item HDRS total score, and depression severity, as measured by the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Moreover, the safety of administrating BTS granules for 8 weeks compared to that of placebo granules will be evaluated.


Trial design and setting

This clinical trial is designed as a randomized, controlled, investigator- and participant-blinded multicenter trial. Three groups will be included: the high-dose BTS, low-dose BTS, and placebo groups. The enrolled participants will be randomly allocated to each group in a 1:1:1 ratio. The superiority of the high- and low-dose BTS granules to placebo granules will be tested. This clinical trial will be conducted in two academic hospitals in the Republic of Korea. This protocol follows the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) Statement (see Additional file 1).

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

This clinical trial will enroll men and women aged 19–65 years diagnosed with MDD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) criteria. The baseline 17-item HDRS total score of enrolled participants should be ≥ 18, and the baseline BMI should be ≥ 18.5 kg/m2. Only participants who provide informed consent can be included.

Exclusion criteria

The exclusion criteria are as follows: participants at high risk of suicide; requiring hospitalization due to MDD; diagnosed and being treated for panic disorder, obsessive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, or personality disorder; having a history of manic, schizophrenic, or mixed episodes; having current or lifetime alcohol or other substance abuse/dependence disorders; having a medical condition that may affect depression severity, such as hypothyroidism or hyperparathyroidism; or having an unstable medical condition, such as uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes, liver dysfunction, or renal impairment. Participants who received nonpharmacological treatments for depression, such as electroconvulsive therapy, vagal nerve stimulation, or deep brain stimulation within 3 months, or those who took medicines that may affect depression severity, such as anxiolytics, antipsychotics, corticosteroids, or hormone replacement therapy within 4 weeks, will be also excluded. To prevent adverse events, participants demonstrating loose stool for more than 3 times a day within 7 days, taking other laxatives, or with symptoms of abdominal pain, vomiting, or loss of appetite due to digestive disorders will be excluded. Moreover, pregnant or lactating women or participants determined to be unsuitable by the investigators will be excluded. The detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are presented on the clinical trial registration webpage (


BTS and placebo granules

Three BTS or placebo granule sachets (1 g for each sachet; total, 3 g) will be orally administered twice a day for 8 weeks. Participants in the high-dose BTS group will take three BTS granule sachets, those in the low-dose BTS group will take one BTS and two placebo granule sachets, and those in the placebo group will take three placebo granule sachets for one dosage. The BTS granule was approved by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (product code: 197,900,572). One gram of the BTS granule sachet contains 0.5 g of soft-extract BTS as an active ingredient. Soft-extract BTS is prepared by decocting the 18 herbs presented in Table 1 together with 8 to 10 times the amount of water boiling at approximately 80–100 °C for 2–3 h. After vacuum concentration under 60 °C, approximately 3.0 g of soft-extract BTS was obtained. The aforementioned amount, which will be taken on the daily be the high-dose BTS group, contains at least 3.8 mg of Glycyrrhizic acid, 2.7 mg of Paeoniflorin, 0.6 mg of total alkaloid (Ephedrine and Pseudoephedrine), 15.4 mg of Baicalin, and 5.4 mg of Geniposide. Three-dimensional chromatogram of BTS sample based on High-performance liquid chromatography-photodiode array analysis can be found in the previous report [14]. The placebo granule does not contain any active ingredients and has been developed to have an identical appearance (lemon yellow granule) and scent to those of the BTS granule. The BTS and placebo granules are manufactured and packaged by Hanpoong pharmaceuticals (Jeonju, Republic of Korea) according to the good manufacturing practice guideline for medicinal products.

Table 1 Name and dosages of herbal substances for 3 g of soft-extract BTS

Criteria for discontinuing allocated interventions

If a serious adverse event occurs or a participant wants to discontinue administration owing to an adverse event, the administration of the investigational product will be stopped. Moreover, in case depression becomes too severe or the risk of suicide has become high in a participant during the trial, the investigators are to determine whether administration should be discontinued. The risk of suicide will be closely assessed using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale [18, 19] at every visit. In case of discontinuing allocated interventions, the safety assessment will be conducted as planned, if possible.

Procedure for monitoring adherence

The compliance rate of administering investigational products, defined as the percentage of the number of BTS or placebo granule sachets actually taken according to the number of sachets that should be taken, will be checked at every visit by pharmacists. The number of sachets actually taken will be checked by the number of empty sachets returned from the participant. Participants will be educated on how to take the BTS or placebo granules by pharmacists at every visit. Participants whose compliance rate is ≥ 75% will be included in the per-protocol set.

Permitted and prohibited concomitant interventions

The medications taken 4 weeks before participating in the trial and not among the following prohibited medications can be permitted as concomitant medications; antidepressants, anxiolytics, antipsychotics, corticosteroids, and hormone replacement therapy are prohibited. Medications or herbal medicine that can affect depressive symptoms, as well as non-pharmacological interventions for improving depression, including acupuncture, meditation, electrical stimulation, and magnetic stimulation, are also prohibited. Moreover, bulk-forming and osmotic laxatives are prohibited. Meanwhile, medications administered for the purpose of the transient treatment of diseases other than depression can be permitted following assessment by investigators.


Primary outcome

The primary objective is to evaluate the effect of BTS on depressive symptoms compared to that of the placebo granules. The difference between the two treatment arms (high-dose vs. placebo and low-dose vs. placebo) in the change from baseline of the 17-item HDRS total score at 8 weeks is the primary endpoint of this trial [20].

Secondary outcomes

Secondary objectives include evaluating the effect of BTS compared to that of the placebo granules on depressive symptoms with clinician-rating and self-rating outcomes at different time points. The change from baseline of the 17-item HDRS total score at 2, 4, 6, and 12 weeks, as well as the response and remission rates defined by the 17-item HDRS total score at 8 weeks and 12 weeks, will be assessed as secondary outcomes. The response rate will be defined as the percentage of participants in each group whose 17-item HDRS total score improved by more than 50%. The remission rate will be defined as the percentage of participants in each group whose 17-item HDRS total score is under 7 points [21]. Secondary outcomes also include the change in the participants’ self-rated BDI-II total score from baseline to at 4, 8, and 12 weeks [22].

The secondary objectives also include evaluating the effect of BTS on anxiety, anger, insomnia, and quality of life compared to that of the placebo granules. State and trait of anxiety will be assessed using State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) [23]. Moreover, state anger, trait anger, and anger expression will be assessed using the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI) [24]. The severity of insomnia will be assessed by Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) [25], and the quality of life will be assessed using the 3-level version of the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-3L) index [26]. These outcomes will be measured at baseline, and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks.

Exploratory outcomes

The exploratory objectives of this trial include exploring predictive factors for the treatment response. The height and weight of each participant will be measured at the screening visit, and weight will be measured every visit to calculate BMI. Moreover, Korean Symptom Check List 95 [27] and Pattern Identifications Tool for Depression [28] will be assessed at baseline, and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. A schematic diagram of participant timelines is presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments. BTS, Bangpungtongsung-san; HDRS, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory-II; STAI, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; STAXI, State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory; EQ-5D-3L, 3-level version of the EuroQol-5 Dimension; C-SSRS, BMI, Body Mass Index; KSCL-95, Korean Symptom Check List 95; and PIT-D, Pattern Identifications Tool for Depression

Sample size and recruitment

The total sample size has been estimated to be 126, with 42 participants for each group. To our knowledge, no previous clinical trial has compared the effect of BTS on depressive symptoms with that of placebo granules, and the effect size of BTS was estimated based on the result of a previous clinical trial on another herbal medicine in patients with MDD [29]. The sample size was calculated based on the hypothesis that the mean change from baseline of the 17-item HDRS total score in the high-dose BTS group is higher to that in placebo group. The mean difference in score between the high-dose BTS and placebo group was estimated to be 4.0 at 8 weeks, and the pooled standard deviation was estimated to be 5.78. With the significance level (α) of 0.05, statistical power (β) of 0.80, allocation ratio of 1:1, and drop-out rate of 0.05, the required sample size for each group was determined to be 42 participants. The participants for this clinical trial will be recruited from two university hospitals in Korea.

The recruitment will be posted on the hospital bulletin boards and online homepage. Moreover, local advertisements on the subway and online advertisements will be conducted to reach the target sample size within the planned period. All recruitment posters and methods have prior institutional review board (IRB) approval.

Random allocation and blinding

An independent statistician generated a random allocation sequence using SAS® version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The manager of the random allocation sequence provided the generated random allocation sequence to the pharmaceutical company to pack the investigational product. The high-dose BTS, low-dose BTS, and placebo granules were packed into the allocated random number based on the sequence provided. The investigators will assign a random number to each participant according to the order of enrollment in visit 2. Allocation will be concealed to the investigators by sequential numbering.

The participants, investigators, pharmacist, and outcome assessor will be blinded to the allocated group of each participant. The placebo granule has been developed to have identical color, scent, and taste to those of the BTS granule. In case of a serious medical emergency, unblinding of the group allocation of the participant can be considered. When sub-investigators or principal investigators judge that code-breaking is required, the principal investigator will quickly hold a meeting among investigators and make a decision as to whether to unblind through discussion. A case of unblinding and related medical issues will be reported to the IRB until 24 h.

Data collection and management

To increase the reliability and validity of the HDRS measured as the primary outcome in this study, investigators in charge of assessing the HDRS at the two sites were trained using a structured interview guide for the HDRS [30]. The validated Korean version of HDRS [31], as well as those for BDI-II [32], STAI [33], STAXI [34], ISI [35], and EQ-5D-5L [36], will be used in this trial. The investigators will check the participants’ understanding and the missing values for all responded questionnaires. The list of measurements that will be used in this clinical trial is presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Overview of measurements

The investigators will send regular messages to participants to encourage them to complete the clinical trial. In case a participant discontinues administration or drops out from the trial, the investigators will attempt to have an assessment visit within 1 week for safety and HDRS follow-up.

The data will be entered into a case report form (CRF) on an electronic data capture system. In the system, the ranges for data values were set to avoid the entry of obvious outliers. The clinical research associates will conduct 100% source document verification between the data recorded in the CRF and data in the source documents. The system and manual query will be reviewed monthly after the first participant is enrolled. Comorbidities, medical history, and adverse events will be coded using the MedDRA dictionary, and drug history will be coded using ATC code.

Statistical methods

Data will be analyzed using SAS® version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). In the efficacy analysis, the full analysis (FA) set will be used as the main analysis set, and the per protocol (PP) set will be used as the supplementary analysis set. The FA set will include randomized participants and minimize the use of those excluded from the analysis. A participant who has never taken the investigational product or has never been evaluated since the random allocation will be excluded from the FA set. The analyses of data containing missing values will be handled with the multiple imputation method. The PP set will include participants who completed the trial without major protocol violations. Participants who drop out during the intervention period (8 weeks), who are found to be inappropriate for inclusion according to the eligibility criteria, or whose total compliance rate is under 75% will be excluded from the PP set. In the safety analysis, the safety set will include all participants who have ever taken the investigational product.

The primary efficacy endpoint is the change from baseline of the 17-item HDRS total score at 8 weeks. The mean difference in outcomes will be compared between the two groups using an analysis of covariance with the site and baseline value as covariates. Tests will be conducted twice to compare the outcomes of the high- and low-dose BTS groups with that of the placebo group. For multiple parallel-group comparisons, a significance level (α) of 0.025 and statistical power (β) of 0.80 will be used for each test. To analyze continuous outcomes among the secondary outcomes (e.g., BDI-II, SRAI, STAXI, ISI, and EQ-5D-3L index scores), an identical analysis method to the primary outcome will be used. To analyze binary outcomes among the secondary outcomes, response to treatment and remission rate of depression will be assessed, and a logistic regression analysis will be conducted with the site and baseline value as covariates. The method to handle multiple comparisons is identical to that used for analyzing continuous outcomes.

Additionally, a subgroup analysis with various criteria will be conducted for exploratory purposes. First, subgroups will be classified based on whether participants are of healthy weight or overweight, as assessed by BMI. Second, other subgroups will be defined using the baseline response to the “changes in appetite” item in BDI-II. Third, some subgroups will be defined using the baseline Korean medicine pattern identification of depression. Moreover, in case of significant differences in the baseline demographic information between groups, adjusted analyses can be conducted.

Data monitoring and auditing

This clinical trial uses an approved herbal medicine product for another indication. The BTS granules do not have any serious adverse events in the real world, and the risk of this trial is expected to be low. Moreover, it is a phase II trial, meaning that a data monitoring committee is not needed. Interim analyses are not planned.

Adverse events will be carefully collected on every visit after the administration of the investigational product. The severity of adverse events will be rated as mild, moderate, and severe. The causality of adverse events with the investigational product will be categorized as follows: definitely related, probably related, possibly related, probably not related, and definitely not related. Adverse events of dyspepsia, diarrhea, and abdominal pain can occur after the administration of BTS granules, and these symptoms will be carefully checked.

Regular monitoring is planned, with frequent visits planned on being conducted for each 4–5 participants enrolled. After the initiation visit, the first regular monitoring visit will be conducted within 7 working days after the first participant is enrolled. Compliance with the IRB-approved clinical protocol, collection of data, written informed consent of participants, recording and reporting of adverse events, management of the investigational product, data entered into the Electronic Data Capture system, and study materials will be checked in the regular monitoring visits.

Protocol amendments

Protocol modifications will be determined after sufficient discussion by investigators at the hospital and Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine and will be applied to the study after obtaining approval for the amendment from the IRB. The current version of the protocol is 1.8 (date: 2022–06-27).

Confidentiality and post-trial care

The personal information of each participant will not be entered into an electronic CRF, and the data of each participant will be collected under screening and random numbers.

Follow-up observation will be conducted at week 12, that is, 4 weeks after the completion of intervention. Compensation criteria and planning regarding those who suffer harm from participation in this trial are prepared. The occurrence of adverse events will be checked at every visit, and required treatment and observation will be applied until the symptoms disappear.

Dissemination policy

The clinical study information and results will be registered to the Clinical Research Information Service. The findings of this study will be presented at conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. The participant-level dataset will be uploaded to the Korean Medicine Data Repository ( after completing the study. Moreover, we will report the final data to the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea, through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute. Results will also be published following completion of the study.


The proposed study will examine the efficacy and safety of BTS administration for 8 weeks among patients with MDD with a BMI ≥ 18.5 kg/m2 compared with those of the placebo. We designed the trial to investigate both low-dose and high-dose BTS by allocating the participants into high-dose BTS, low-dose BTS, and placebo groups in a 1:1:1 ratio. In addition to assessing depression using the HDRS total score as the primary outcome, the response and remission rates, anxiety, anger, insomnia, and quality of life will be measured.

The current study will compare both low and high doses of BTS, as low-dose BTS showed better efficacy for depression in animal studies, even though the commonly used dose for obese human patients is that equivalent to the high dose used in this trial. As obesity and depression share biological pathways, BTS is expected to work on both obesity and depression [37]. Obesity causes hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal dysregulation and changes in the plasma levels of cortisol, leptin, adiponectin, resistin, and insulin, which are hormones involved in emotional and mood regulation [38]. Obesity and depression are vulnerable when an imbalance in appetite and homeostasis dysregulation of the central nervous system occurs. The association between both diseases is complex and bidirectional [37]. These findings suggest that the medications with indications for obesity can be repositioned as new antidepressants as there is a possibility of common mechanisms for both diseases. Thus, it is expected that BTS may be particularly effective for patients with atypical depression, especially those who have bulimia or weight gain. These aspects were not only reflected in inclusion criteria, but also in the additional analyses that were planned, which included subgroup analyses of patients who are overweight based on BMI and of patients who responded that they have increased appetite in the depression symptom evaluation during screening.

Moreover, this clinical trial considered pattern identification [39], an important feature of diagnosis and clinical decision-making in Korean medicine (KM). Herbal medicines for depression are often prescribed according to the individuals’ pattern identification [40]. To design clinical trials on herbal medicine, the disease studied should be defined clearly in both conventional medical and traditional eastern Asian medical approaches [41]. This clinical trial will recruit patients with MDD following the DSM-5 diagnostic approach, and pattern identification will be partially implemented using the objective measurement of BMI. By excluding patients with underweight BMI, we intended to exclude patients who are not adequate for BTS prescription.

This study has some limitations. First, even though we planned to develop and use BTS in patients with atypical depression, we did not adopt the diagnosis of the atypical depression subtype and only excluded patients who are underweight. The feasibility for recruiting each participant in the clinical trial was considered, and we attempted to use objective criteria for recruitment as much as possible. Second, as this is a placebo-controlled phase II trial, comparison of BTS with commonly used antidepressants, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, is warranted in a future phase III definitive trial.

This phase II trial will provide information on the efficacy and safety of BTS in patients with MDD who are of healthy weight or overweight. The findings of this randomized controlled study are expected to provide evidence for a novel approach to depression with fewer side effects and a low risk of drug dependence, especially in the atypical depression subtype.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.





Major depressive disorder


Body mass index


Hamilton Depression Rating Scale


Beck Depression Inventory-II


Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials


Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5


State-Trait Anxiety Inventory


State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory


Insomnia Severity Index


3-Level version of the EuroQol-5 Dimension


Institutional review board


Case report form


Full analysis


Per protocol


  1. Santomauro DF, Herrera AMM, Shadid J, Zheng P, Ashbaugh C, Pigott DM, et al. Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet. 2021;398(10312):1700–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Keller MB, Boland RJ. Implications of failing to achieve successful long-term maintenance treatment of recurrent unipolar major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 1998;44(5):348–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Korean Statistical Information Service. Annual Report on the Causes of Death Statistics in Republic of Korea. Statistics Korea; 2022. Available from:

  4. Kleinberg A, Aluoja A, Vasar V. Help-Seeking for Emotional Problems in Major Depression. Community Ment Health J. 2013;49(4):427–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee KU, Kim W, Min KJ, Shin YC, Chung SK, Bahk WM. The rate and risk factors of early discontinuation of antidepressant treatment in patients with major depressive disorder. Korean J Psychopharmacol. 2006;17(6):550–6.

  6. Casper RC, Redmond DE Jr, Katz MM, Schaffer CB, Davis JM, Koslow SH. Somatic Symptoms in Primary Affective Disorder: Presence and Relationship to the Classification of Depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42(11):1098–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gili M, Roca M, Armengol S, Asensio D, Garcia-Campayo J, Parker G. Clinical Patterns and Treatment Outcome in Patients with Melancholic, Atypical and Non-Melancholic Depressions. PLOS ONE. 2012;7(10):e48200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub; 2013.

  9. Brailean A, Curtis J, Davis K, Dregan A, Hotopf M. Characteristics, comorbidities, and correlates of atypical depression: evidence from the UK Biobank Mental Health Survey. Psychol Med. 2020;50(7):1129–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Silva DA, Coutinho E da SF, Ferriani LO, Viana MC. Depression subtypes and obesity in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2020;21(3):e12966.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Korte SM, Prins J, Krajnc AM, Hendriksen H, Oosting RS, Westphal KG, et al. The many different faces of major depression: it is time for personalized medicine. Eur J Pharmacol. 2015;753:88–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Park JH, Kim HJ. Clinical practice recommendations for Bangpungtongseong-san (Bofutsusho-san) and Bangkihwangki-tang(Boiogito) in obesity. J Korean Med Obes Res. 2012;12(1):48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Park JH, Lee MJ, Kim HJ. Review on the Research Related to Bangpungtongseong-san (Bofutsusho-san) in Korea. J Korean Med Rehabil. 2011;21(2):189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Park BK, Kim NS, Kim YR, Yang C, Jung IC, Jang IS, et al. Antidepressant and Anti-Neuroinflammatory Effects of Bangpungtongsung-San. Front Pharmacol. 2020 [cited 2022 Nov 3];11. Available from:

  15. Azushima K, Tamura K, Haku S, Wakui H, Kanaoka T, Ohsawa M, et al. Effects of the oriental herbal medicine Bofu-tsusho-san in obesity hypertension: A multicenter, randomized, parallel-group controlled trial (ATH-D-14–01021.R2). Atherosclerosis. 2015;240(1):297–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee JE, Song YK, Lim HH. Randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study of Bofu-tsusho-san on obese patients. J Korean Med Obes Res. 2010;10(1):1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Uneda K, Kawai Y, Yamada T, Kaneko A, Saito R, Chen L, et al. Japanese traditional Kampo medicine bofutsushosan improves body mass index in participants with obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2022;17(4):e0266917.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Posner K, Brown GK, Stanley B, Brent DA, Yershova KV, Oquendo MA, et al. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168(12):1266–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Jang HA, Park E, Jon DI, Park HJ, Ho HJ, Jung MH, et al. Validation of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale in Depression Patients. Korean J Clin Psychol. 2014;33(4):799–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960;23:56–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Riedel M, Möller HJ, Obermeier M, Schennach-Wolff R, Bauer M, Adli M, et al. Response and remission criteria in major depression–a validation of current practice. J Psychiatr Res. 2010;44(15):1063–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. BDI-II. Beck Depression Inventory: Manual. Psychological Corporation; 1996. p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Spielberger CD. STAI State-trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults Form Y: Review Set; Manual, Test, Scoring Key. California: Mind Garden; 1983. book.

  24. Spielberger CD. STAXI-2: State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 : Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources. 1999. p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bastien CH, Vallières A, Morin CM. Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Med. 2001;2(4):297–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):337–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kwon S. Implementation guidelines of Korean-Symptom Check List 95 (KSCL95). Seoul: Jung Ang Juk Sung Publisher; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lee HS, Kang WC, Jung IC. Reliability and validity analysis of the instrument on pattern identifications for depression. J Orient Neuropsychiatry. 2015;26(4):407–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hao X nan, Wang H yan, Han Z cheng, Yan Y mei, Qiao Y yan, Zhang K rang, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of Danzhiningshen capsules in the treatment of mild and moderate depression. Chin J New Drugs. 2015;24(17):1992–5.

  30. Williams JB. A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988;45(8):742–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yi JS, Bae SO, Ahn YM, Park DB, Noh KS, Shin HK, et al. Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(K-HDRS). J Korean Neuropsychiatr Association. 2016;44(4):456–65.

  32. Lim SU, Lee E ho, Soontaeg H, Hwang HS, Hae KJ. The Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition: Psychometric Properties in Korean Adult Populations. Korean J Clin Psychol. 2019;38(3):300–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Han DW, Lee JH, Jeon KG. Development of Spielberger’s State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. STAI-Y Korean J Health Psychol. 1996;1(1):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chon KK, Hahn DW, Lee CH. Korean adaptation of the state-trait anger expression inventory (STAXI-K): The case of college students. Korean J Health Psychol. 1998;3(1):18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cho YW, Song ML, Morin CM. Validation of a Korean version of the insomnia severity index. J Clin Neurol Seoul Korea. 2014;10(3):210–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee YK, Nam HS, Chuang LH, Kim KY, Yang HK, Kwon IS, et al. South Korean time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states: modeling with observed values for 101 health states. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2009;12(8):1187–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Milaneschi Y, Simmons WK, van Rossum EFC, Penninx BW. Depression and obesity: evidence of shared biological mechanisms. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24(1):18–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hryhorczuk C, Sharma S, Fulton S. Metabolic disturbances connecting obesity and depression. Front Neurosci. 2013 [cited 2022 Dec 22];7. Available from:

  39. Jiang M, Lu C, Zhang C, Yang J, Tan Y, Lu A, et al. Syndrome differentiation in modern research of traditional Chinese medicine. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;140(3):634–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yeung WF, Chung KF, Ng KY, Yu YM, Zhang SP, Ng BFL, et al. Prescription of Chinese Herbal Medicine in Pattern-Based Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment for Depression: A Systematic Review. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med ECAM. 2015;2015: 160189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Witt CM, Aickin M, Cherkin D, Che CT, Elder C, Flower A, et al. Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for Chinese medicine trials: a consensus document. Trials. 2014;15(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank all the research staff at the Kyung Hee University Korean Medicine Hospital, Daejeon Korean Medicine Hospital of Daejeon University, Hanpoong pharmaceuticals, and Neonutra Co., Ltd for their contributions to initiating the trial.


This research was supported by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HI21C2520).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



MYL and CY made contributions to the conception and design of this trial. YK, YC, S-HC, D-HK, and ICJ helped with implementation. YK and YC drafted the original manuscript, and the remaining authors revised it. All authors approved the submitted version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changsop Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study has been approved by the institutional review board of the Kyung Hee University Korean Medicine Hospital (approval number: KOMCIRB2022-05–007-001) and Daejeon Korean Medicine Hospital of Daejeon University (approval number: DJDSKH-22-DR-10).

Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before the screening process. The principal investigator and sub-investigators who are Korean medicine doctors in the hospital and delegated by the principal investigators will provide all information pertaining to the clinical study and obtain informed consent from participants. The informed consent and description of the study approved by the IRB will be used. Sufficient time and opportunity for participants to ask questions about the details of the clinical study and to decide whether to participate will be provided.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

MYL and CY are holding a patent for BTS extract on improving depressive and anxiety disorders. The other authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

SPIRIT checklist.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, Y., Choi, Y., Lee, M.Y. et al. Bangpungtongsung-san for patients with major depressive disorder: study protocol for a randomized controlled phase II clinical trial. BMC Complement Med Ther 23, 114 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Major depressive disorder
  • Phase II study
  • Bangpungtongseong-san
  • Fangfengtongsheng-san
  • Bofu-tsusho-san
  • Herbal medicine
  • Clinical protocol
  • Randomized controlled trial