Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of Kami-guibi-tang for mild cognitive impairment: a pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial



Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is considered an intermediate phase between normal aging and dementia. As the majority of cases of amnestic MCI (aMCI) progress to Alzheimer’s disease (AD), it is considered the prodromal stage of AD, and a treatment target for prevention of further cognitive decline. However, no medications have been shown to have symptomatic or preventive benefits in MCI. Kami-guibi-tang (KGT) is a traditional herbal formula used in Korean medicine to treat amnesia, which is reported to increase acetylcholine levels via activation of choline acetyltransferase. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of KGT in patients with aMCI.


This study was designed as a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Participants diagnosed with aMCI were randomized to receive either KGT or placebo granules for 24 weeks. The efficacy measure was a change in the Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB) score. The safety measures included the occurrence of adverse events and abnormalities in vital signs and blood chemistry, electrocardiogram (ECG), and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings.


A total of 16 patients in the KGT group and 14 patients in the placebo group were investigated in the study. The mean score of Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) significantly improved from 1.53 (0.64) points to 1.13 (0.62) points in the KGT group (p = 0.010), whereas it worsened from 1.61 (0.88) points to 1.75 (0.94) points in the placebo group. There was a significant difference in the CDR-SB scores between the two groups after the intervention (p = 0.045). The total SNSB-D scores and the scores in the memory domain after the treatment were significantly higher than the baseline values in the KGT group, but not in the placebo group. The frequency of adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups, and there were no abnormalities in vital signs or blood test, ECG, and brain MRI findings after the intervention.


KGT may provide a safe and effective treatment option for patients with aMCI. Further studies with a larger sample size are needed to validate the findings.

Trial registration

Korean Clinical Trial Registry, ID: KCT0002407; Registered on March 30, 2017,

Peer Review reports


Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is the intermediate stage between the cognitive changes of normal aging and dementia [1]. It is a syndrome defined as a cognitive decline greater than that expected for an individual’s age and educational level but that does not interfere with the performance of activities of daily living (ADLs) [2]. The incidence of MCI in individuals aged over 70 years was estimated to be 5 to 6% per year [3].

Amnestic MCI (aMCI), which is the most common subtype of MCI, is characterized by memory impairment [4] and usually progresses to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [5]. Therefore, it is often considered the prodromal stage of AD [6]. It is reported that 10 to 15% of patients with aMCI develop AD per year, while 1 to 2% of healthy subjects develop AD per year [7].

As the prevalence of AD increases with advancing age [8], interest in the early treatment of MCI has been stimulated by the hope that intervention at this stage may delay the progression to AD [9]. A variety of pharmaceutical agents have been tested, including cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs), which are the standard for symptomatic treatment of AD [10, 11]; however, there is currently no medication proven to enhance memory function or prevent further cognitive decline in patients with MCI [12, 13].

Kami-guibi-tang (KGT; Kami-guibi-tang in Korean, Kami-kihi-to in Japanese, Jia-wei-gui-pi-tang in Chinese) is a traditional herbal formula that has been used to treat amnesia [14], insomnia [15], loss of appetite [16] for hundreds of years in Korea, Japan and China [17,18,19]. KGT improved deficits in object recognition memory in 5XFAD mice, a transgenic animal model of AD, which exhibit accelerated amyloid-beta deposition [20]; it also improved learning performance in a mouse model of accelerated senescence [21]. Moreover, a clinical study showed that the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of patients with AD improved after taking oral kihito granules [22]. A cross-over clinical study revealed that the MMSE score significantly increased during the kihito intake period but not during the ChEI alone treatment period [23].

As shown in previous studies [20,21,22,23], KGT was reported to have a beneficial effect on cognitive improvement in patients with AD. We hypothesized that KGT might also enhance cognitive function, specifically memory function, in aMCI patients. To our knowledge, no randomized clinical trial has been conducted to evaluate the effect of KGT in MCI. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of KGT in improving cognitive function of patients with aMCI.


Study design

The study protocol has been previously published [24]. This study was designed as a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. It was conducted at Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea from March 2017 to November 2019. The study consisted of three phases: a screening period lasting 2 weeks, a treatment period lasting 24 weeks, and a follow-up period for adverse events lasting 4 weeks.

The protocol of this trial was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong (KHNMC-OH-IRB 2016–12–006-006) and the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (31234), and was registered at the Korean Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number: KCT0002407, All participants provided voluntary signed informed consent before participating in this study. The study subjects were limited to amnestic subtype of MCI, which has preserved abilities in other cognitive functions and independent performances of ADLs. Also, the study investigators assessed their decisional capacity through interviews and neuropsychological test. The participants were considered capable of giving consent for participation in research, and therefore, it was regarded unnecessary to use surrogate consent.

This trial was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki principles and the Korean Good Clinical Practice guidelines.


Inclusion criteria

Participants were included in the study if they were aged between 55 and 90 years old; complained of impaired memory; had objective cognitive impairment as measured using the Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB), with a Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) score of 3 points, clinical dementia rating (CDR) of 0.5 points, and a normal Korean MMSE (K-MMSE) score; and were diagnosed with aMCI by a neurologist.

Exclusion criteria

Participants were excluded if they met any of the following criteria: diagnosed with AD according to the criteria of the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association; had a brain disorder causing neurological symptoms other than cognitive impairment; a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, Down’s syndrome, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, or any other neurodegenerative disorder; cognitive impairment resulting from other diseases, including head trauma, hypoxic brain damage, vitamin deficiency, brain tumor, encephalitis, neurosyphilis, and mental retardation; cerebrovascular diseases with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence; a history of or current major depression; concomitant psychiatric disorders or behavioral problems that require antipsychotic medication; a history of a convulsive disorder, except for febrile convulsion during childhood; unstable or life-threatening medical conditions; uncontrolled hypertension; heart or renal diseases; peripheral edema; gastrointestinal symptoms, such as anorexia, nausea, abdominal pain, or diarrhea; use of medications that could induce hypokalemia or myopathy; drug hypersensitivity to the constituents of the study medication; clinically significant abnormalities in blood chemistry test results, including levels of serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) more than two-fold the upper normal limit or serum creatinine (Cr) level more than 10% above the upper normal limit; participation in any other clinical trials within the previous 4 weeks; illiteracy; and contraindications for MRI.

Dropout criteria

Participants who met any of the following criteria were removed from the study: (1) occurrence of any severe adverse effects, (2) voluntary withdrawal from the trial, (3) non-observance of the protocol (i.e., drug compliance below 80%), (4) use of additional medications to improve cognitive function during the study period, and (5) decision made by the principal investigator.

Recruitment and enrollment

We recruited participants aged 55–90 years with a complaint of impaired memory through advertisements and referrals. We screened candidates using telephone interviews, the inclusion/exclusion criteria, and K-MMSE and Korean Dementia Screening Questionnaire (KDSQ) findings. If the score of delayed recall items on the K-MMSE is less than 2 points out of 3, the SNSB was performed. If the score of any subtests in the memory domain of SNSB was less than 16 percentile, and if a neurologist confirmed the diagnosis of aMCI, the participant was included in the trial.

Randomization and blinding

We randomly allocated the enrolled participants to either the treatment (KGT) or control (placebo) group in a 1:1 ratio, using the block randomization method with a block size of four. A researcher uninvolved in the assessment generated a random sequence using IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). The manufacturer produced KGT and placebo granules to be identical in appearance, smell, taste, and packaging, and labeled the random code numbers on the medication kit. An independent pharmacist distributed the granules to the participants in the order of enrollment. The participants, assessor, pharmacist, and researchers were all blinded to the allocation throughout the course of the study. Cases were unblinded only if serious adverse events occurred.


After randomization, the KGT group received KGT granules (3.0 g/pack), and the placebo group received placebo granules (3 g/pack). The participants were instructed to dissolve the granules in hot water and drink the solution three times per day, 30 min after meals. KGT, the herbal medication under study, is a yellow-brown mixture of spray-dried hot water extracts of 15 medicinal herbs. The composition and amount of each ingredient are shown in Table 1. The KGT granules used were manufactured by Kyoung Bang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Incheon, Korea), which has been certified for Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP). The placebo granules were composed of corn starch, lactose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, caramel color (food additives), tartrazine (FD&C Yellow 5), Allura Red AC (FD&C Red 40), and Ssanghwa flavor. They were produced by the same manufacturer, using the standard method of placebo manufacturing according to the Korean GMP guidelines.

Table 1 Composition of Kami-guibi-tang

The participants were provided with 12 weeks’ worth of trial drugs at the first and second visits. They were required to return any unused drugs at the second and third visits. The number of returned drugs was counted to evaluate drug compliance, and participants with less than 80% compliance were excluded.

The administration of medications for underlying diseases, such as hypertension or diabetes mellitus, was permitted during the intervention; however, any medication that might affect cognitive function was prohibited. We asked participants to report all medications taken during the study period at each visit and recorded the names, duration of use, and dosage of the drugs on the case report form.


Korean ini-mental state examination and Seoul neuropsychological screening battery

The K-MMSE was performed at the screening visit and on the 12th week of intervention to rule out normal cognition and dementia, and to screen for MCI. It is a simple screening test for the longitudinal assessment of general cognition [25].

The SNSB was conducted by an independent clinical psychologist at baseline and the 24th week of intervention to evaluate the effect of KGT on cognitive function. It is a valid and reliable neuropsychological test battery for assessing and monitoring cognitive function, which is one the most widely used assessments in South Korea [26]. The SNSB-II, a revised version of the SNSB, is composed of subtests that evaluate five cognitive aspects: attention, language, memory, visuospatial function, and executive function [27].

The SNSB test yields scores, percentile ranks in a graph and a table. 50%ile means the average of individuals at the same age or educational level. It is regarded that there is cognitive impairment if the score is less than 16%ile (1 standard deviation [SD]). If the memory domain is less than 16%ile, it was considered there was objective memory impairment.

A modified version of the original SNSB for dementia (SNSB-D) was used to assess the general cognitive function using a score drawn from the sum of the score for the five domains [28]. The maximum total score is 300 points consisting of 17/300 points (6%) for attention, 27/300 points (9%) for language and related function, 150/300 points (50%) for memory, 36/300 points (12%) for visuospatial function, and 70/300 points (23%) for frontal/executive function. The contents of the SNSB-D are shown in Additional File 2.

Other related tests, such as the K-MMSE, CDR scale, GDS, Barthel-Activities of Daily Living (Barthel-ADL) scale, Korean-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (K-IADL) scale, and Short version-Geriatric Depression Scale (SGDS), were also conducted (Additional File 3).

The CDR scale and GDS are the most well-known rating scales that measure the symptoms and severity of dementia [29]. The CDR scale yields a global score (CDR-GS) and a sum of boxes score (CDR-SB). The CDR-GS is used to stage dementia severity on a 5-point scale that ranges between 0 and 3, where 0 = absence of symptoms, 0.5 = questionable, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe dementia. The CDR-SB, which refers to the sum of the score for six domains (three cognitive domains: orientation, memory, and judgment and problem-solving; three functional domains: home and hobbies, personal care, and community affairs), is used to measure global cognition and functioning [30]. A higher score indicates more severe impairment. The GDS scale is used to assess the stages of cognitive decline on a 7-point scale [31].

Two instruments were used to assess ADLs. The Barthel-ADL scale measures the ability to perform ADLs, such as feeding, bathing, and dressing [32]. The K-IADL scale is used to evaluate instrumental ADLs, which are more complex activities, such as using the telephone, preparing food, and taking medications [33]. The SGDS is a screening tool for depression in elderly patients [34].

Blood test and electrocardiogram (ECG)

Laboratory tests and ECGs were performed to evaluate the safety of KGT. Blood levels of blood urea nitrogen, Cr, AST, ALT, Na, K, Cl, creatine phosphokinase, lactate dehydrogenase, and glucose were measured at baseline and on the 12th and 24th weeks of intervention. ECG was performed at baseline and the 24th week.

Brain MRI

Brain MRI was performed at baseline and the 24th week. Three-dimensional T1-weighted images, two-dimensional T2-weighted images, and fluid attenuation inversion recovery sequences were acquired to evaluate structural abnormalities in the brain.

Outcome variables

Efficacy outcome

We observed the changes in the mean SNSB-D score and other indices, including the CDR, GDS score, K-MMSE score, Barthel-ADL scale score, K-IADL scale score, and SGDS score, before and after administration of the KGT and placebo granules and compared the changes between the KGT and placebo groups. In particular, the change in general cognition was assessed on the basis of the change in the total SNSB-D score and CDR-SB score. The change in each cognitive domain was assessed on the basis of the changes in the five SNSB-D subtest scores.

Safety outcome

The safety of KGT was evaluated by monitoring any occurrence of adverse events and any abnormalities in the vital signs and blood test, ECG, and brain MRI findings. The investigators assessed any adverse events face to face at each visit and via telephone interviews every week during the intervention period and 4 weeks after the completion of the study. The severity and relationship of the adverse events to the study drug were assessed.

Statistical analysis

Sample size calculation

This trial was a pilot study, and we could not find previous data indicating the sample size needed to yield significant results for determining the effect of KGT as assessed using the SNSB scores. For pilot trials, a sample size of 20–40 participants was suggested by Kieser and Wassmer [35]. Furthermore, Browne suggested a general flat rule to use at least 30 subjects to estimate a parameter [36]. Therefore, a sample size of 30 participants was determined to be adequate, and we attempted to recruit 38 individuals at maximum to allow for a 20% dropout rate.

Data analyses

All the data acquired from the study were entered into Microsoft Excel 2010 (Microsoft Co., Redmond, WA, USA), and the statistical analysis was performed by the investigators and an independent professional statistician using IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0 (IBM Co.).

The analysis of treatment efficacy was performed on the per-protocol (PP) set. The PP population included participants who completed taking the study medication for 24 weeks and underwent all examinations. The analysis of the treatment safety was performed on the intention-to-treat (ITT) set. The ITT population included those who took the KGT and placebo granules more than once after randomization.

To analyze the efficacy outcome and demographic variables, such as age and educational level, we performed the Shapiro-Wilk test to confirm the normality of data distribution. For normally distributed data, the paired t-test was used for intra-group comparisons and independent t-test for intergroup comparisons. For non-normally distributed data, Wilcoxon’s signed rank test was used for intra-group comparisons and the Mann-Whitney U test for intergroup comparisons. To analyze the K-MMSE score, which was measured three times, the Friedman test was performed. To compare baseline variables, such as sex, conversion to normal cognition or dementia, and occurrence of adverse events, between groups, we conducted Pearson’s chi square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.

All statistical analyses were two-tailed, and the significance level was set at p-values of < 0.05. Continuous variables are presented as means (standard deviations) or medians (interquartile ranges) and categorical variables as numbers (percentages).



We recruited participants from June 2017 to March 2019. A total of 584 participants were screened via telephone interviews; on the basis of the K-MMSE and KDSQ findings, there were 60 participants with suspected MCI. After evaluation using the SNSB test, a total of 33 participants who were finally diagnosed with aMCI were enrolled. Seventeen participants were assigned to the KGT group and 16 participants to the placebo group. The details of the recruitment, enrollment, and distribution of the participants are demonstrated in Fig. 1. All 33 randomized participants were included in the safety analysis. Sixteen participants from the KGT group and 14 from the placebo group were included in the efficacy analysis (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

CONSORT diagram. Abbreviation: K-MMSE, Korean Mini Mental Status Examination; KDSQ, Korean Dementia Screening Questionnaire; SNSB, Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery; aMCI, amnestic mild cognitive impairment

No significant differences were observed in the demographic variables or efficacy outcomes, such as the baseline SNSB-D score, CDR, GDS score, K-MMSE score, Barthel-ADL score, K-IADL score, and SGDS score (Table 2), between the groups following randomization.

Table 2 Demographic and baseline characteristics

Efficacy outcome

Seoul neuropsychological screening battery for dementia (SNSB-D)

In the KGT group, the total SNSB-D score increased significantly from 176.00 (24.76) points at baseline to 198.47 (31.29) points at the 24th week (p < 0.001, Table 3); however, the change was not significant in the placebo group (p = 0.143, Table 3). There was no significant difference in the SNSB-D score at the 24th week between the groups (p = 0.249, Table 3).

Table 3 SNSB-D scores at baseline and the 24th week

Among the scores for the five cognitive domains, the score for the memory domain in the KGT group increased significantly from 57.88 (17.76) points at baseline to 74.34 (22.66) points at the 24th week (p < 0.001, Table 3); however, the change was not significant in the placebo group (p = 0.051, Table 3). There was no significant difference in the score for the memory domain at the 24th week between the groups (p = 0.398, Table 3).

Among the scores for the memory domain subsets, the Seoul Verbal Learning Test (SVLT) recall test score increased from 17.5 (15.0–25.3) points to 24.5 (15.5–29.8) points; the Rey Complex Figrue Test (RCFT) recall test score increased from 20.00 (10.30) points to 29.91 (13.54) points; and the RCFT recognition score increased from 5.9 (2.6) points to 7.6 (1.9) points after 24 weeks of intervention in the KGT group (p = 0.003, p < 0.001, and p = 0.002, Table 4); however, the changes in the placebo group were not significant (p = 0.081, p = 0.062, and p = 0.223, respectively, Table 4). There was no significant difference in the scores at the 24th week between the two groups (p = 0.190, p = 0.660, and p = 0.821, respectively, Table 4).

Table 4 Memory domain subset scores at baseline and the 24th week

Other cognitive tests

Clinical dementia rating-sum of boxes (CDR-SB)

The CDR-SB score improved significantly from 1.53 (0.64) points to 1.13 (0.62) points after the intervention in the KGT group (p = 0.010, Table 5); however, it worsened from 1.61 (0.88) points to 1.75 (0.94) points in the placebo group. There was a significant difference in the score at the 24th week between the two groups (p = 0.045, Table 5).

Table 5 CDR-SB scores at baseline and the 24th week

Clinical dementia rating-global score (CDR-GS)

At baseline, all participants had a CDR-GS score of 0.5 point, which indicates “questionable dementia.” After 24 weeks of intervention, 31.25% of the KGT group participants had a reversion of the CDR-GS score to 0 point, which indicates “no dementia,” in comparison with 14.29% of the placebo group participants. The reversion rate was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.399, Table 6). The CDR-GS score did not increase to 1 point, which indicates “mild dementia,” in any participant.

Table 6 Reversion rate to normal cognition as measured using the CDR-GS score after 24 weeks of intervention

Other indices

The K-MMSE, GDS, K-IADL scale, and SGDS scores did not change significantly after the intervention in both groups, and there were no significant differences in the scores at the 24th week between the two groups (Table 7).

Table 7 K-MMSE and other test scores at baseline and the 12th and 24th week

Safety outcome

Adverse events

Approximately 11.8% of the KGT group participants and 12.5% of the placebo group participants reported adverse events. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of adverse events between the two groups (p = 1.0).

In the KGT group, one participant had temporomandibular joint pain and one had mild dyspepsia. These symptoms appeared after taking the medication for more than 12 weeks and subsided spontaneously within 2 weeks. In the placebo group, one patient had heartburn and another developed gastric cancer. There was no link found between these adverse events and the study drug.


There were no significant changes in the vital signs, ECG, blood test including BUN, Cr, AST, ALT, Na, K, Cl, CPK, LDH, and glucose, or brain MRI findings after the intervention in both groups. There were no significant abnormalities observed in any of the above-mentioned examinations.


In this study, the general cognition of participants as measured using the CDR-SB score improved significantly in the KGT group unlike those in the placebo group; further, general cognition as measured using the total SNSB-D score improved significantly in the KGT group in comparison with their baseline score. Their memory as measured using the SNSB-D subtest scores improved significantly in the KGT group after the intervention.

In previous studies, the MMSE has been mainly used to measure cognitive function; however, it lacks sensitivity in detecting mild degrees of cognitive dysfunction and demonstrates ceiling effects in MCI [37]. Other instruments, including the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale, often lack the ability to assess certain cognitive domains, such as attention and executive function. In this study, we used the full neuropsychological battery, SNSB, which contains comprehensive and diverse tests of varying difficulties, to sensitively monitor changes in cognitive function [26].

The SNSB-D is a useful tool that can discriminate between MCI, AD, and normal aging [28]. A study reported that the change in the SNSB-D score was significantly correlated with the percent change in the cortical gray matter volume in an aMCI group; therefore, the SNSB-D score is capable of estimating neurodegenerative changes [37]. Our finding that the SNSB-D score increased significantly indicates that KGT might not only improve cognitive symptoms but may also influence disease progression.

Among the five cognitive domains, the memory domain was the most remarkably affected domain. Memory impairment is a core feature of aMCI and AD [38, 39]. We observed that both verbal (SVLT recall) and visual memory (RCFT recall and RCFT recognition) improved after taking the KGT granules. This is particularly notable considering that verbal memory impairment is the best neuropsychological predictor of further cognitive decline and progression to AD [40].

Other studies using the CDR-SB showed that there was no significant difference in the change in the CDR-SB score between the rofecoxib and placebo groups [41] and that it worsened less in the galantamine group than in the placebo group [11]. This trial showed that the CDR-SB scores differed significantly between the two groups after the intervention. Moreover, the CDR-SB score decreased in the KGT group but increased in the placebo group, which means that KGT granules improved global cognition and functioning.

We also attempted to estimate how KGT might influence disease progression from the CDR-GS score. It was reported that the annual reversion rate from MCI to normal cognition was 18.20% [42]. In this study, the rate was 14.29% in the placebo group compared to 31.25% in the KGT group, which was higher than the natural course. Although there was no significant difference, KGT might delay the disease progression, considering the significant increase in the CDR-SB score.

There was no significant improvement in the scores for other cognitive domains, except for memory. This may be because the study population was limited patients with aMCI, whose cognitive function in other domains is relatively preserved. Among the other related tests included in the SNSB-II, there was no significant improvement, except for in the CDR. It is presumable that the inclusion of only participants with normal MMSE and ADL scores in this trial has contributed to the outcome. Further, we excluded individuals with a history of depression to eliminate any bias from cognitive decline caused by depression, which might have resulted in the high average SGDS score.

Although the exact mechanism by which KGT ameliorates cognitive decline is unknown, possible mechanisms have been suggested in previous studies. Among the 15 medicinal herbs of KGT, Polygalae Radix is believed to play a key role in improving cognitive function, by elevating acetylcholine levels via activation of choline acetyltransferase [43]. It is similar to ChEIs, which inhibit cholinesterase, in that both increase the level of acetylcholine; however P. radix is known to have additional neuroprotective effects by enhancing the axonal length after Aβ-induced axonal atrophy and inhibiting neural damage [44].

In addition to improving cognitive symptoms, the beneficial effect of KGT on AD pathology has been demonstrated in several studies. It is reported that KGT not only reduced the number of amyloid plaques in the frontal cortex and hippocampus [20] but also reversed the progression of Aβ-induced axonal degeneration in cortical neurons. KGT treatment also led to tau dephosphorylation in primary cultured cortical neurons that were phosphorylated by Aβ treatment [45] . These results indicate the possible mechanisms explaining how KGT might slow the disease progression of aMCI.

This trial showed that KGT was safe and well tolerated, as noted in previous studies [46, 47]. The frequency of adverse events did not differ significantly between the KGT and placebo groups. The adverse events that occurred in the KGT group were mild and transient and disappeared spontaneously without the need for discontinuing medication. As ChEIs often cause side effects, including gastrointestinal symptoms and cardiac concerns, the safety of KGT could be another advantage.

There are several limitations in this study. First, the sample size was relatively small; however, the sample size was enough for a pilot study to achieve the goal of evaluating the efficacy of KGT. Second, there was no long-term follow-up examination. As MCI can progress slowly over time, it is necessary to monitor the effect over a long-term basis. Third, the study excluded patients with depression, although a majority of patients with MCI exhibited neuropsychological symptoms. As KGT can be also used for insomnia, anorexia, and depression, further studies should include patients with MCI and concurrent psychological symptoms. However, considering the impact that treating depression may have on cognitive function, this study aimed to differentiate the effect of KGT on improving cognitive function from the effects secondary to mood improvement.

In this study, we strengthened the assessment so that we could identify specifically how much cognitive function improved. Further, we also attempted to remove the learning effect from repetitive measurement by setting 24 weeks as the period between the baseline and endpoint measurements. The study is also the first clinical study that investigated the effects of KGT on aMCI. We hope that our findings will support a future large-scale clinical trial to generate confirmatory evidence for the use of KGT in patients with aMCI.


This pilot study aimed to explorethe efficacy and safety of KGT for aMCI. The trial demonstrated that KGT may be effective in improving general cognition in patients with aMCI and that it was generally safe and well tolerated. The findings highlight the potential of KGT as a possible treatment option for aMCI. Larger-scale clinical trials are needed to substantiate clinical evidence on the benefits of KGT and to identify the mechanisms underlying its efficacy.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



mild cognitive impairment


amnestic mild cognitive impairment


Alzheimer’s disease




Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery




magnetic resonance imaging


Seoul verbal learning test


cholinesterase inhibitor


Mini Mental State Examination


Global Deterioration Scale


clinical dementia rating


Korean Mini Mental Status Examination


aspartate aminotransferase


alanine aminotransferase




Korean Dementia Screening Questionnaire


Good Manufacturing Practice


Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery for dementia


Seoul Verbal Learning Test


Rey Complex Figure Test


Barthel-Activities of Daily Living


Korean-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living


activities of daily living


Short version-Geriatric Depression Scale


clinical dementia rating-global score


clinical dementia rating-sum of boxes






  1. 1.

    Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment: transition between aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neurologia. 2000;15(3):93–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gauthier S, Reisberg B, Zaudig M, et al. Seminar mild cognitive impairment. Lancet. 2006;367:1262–70.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Roberts RO, Geda YE, Knopman DS, et al. The incidence of MCI differs by subtype and is higher in men: the Mayo Clinic study of aging. Neurology. 2012 Jan;78(5):342–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Petersen RC, Roberts RO, Knopman DS, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: ten years later. Arch Neurol. 2009;66(12):1447.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Tierney MC, Szalai JP, Snow WG, et al. Prediction of probable Alzheimer's disease in memory-impaired patients: a prospective longitudinal study. Neurology. 1996;46:661–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Morris JC, Storandt M, Miller JP, et al. Mild cognitive impairment represents early-stage Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2001;58(3):397.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Peterson RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol 1999;56:303–308.

  8. 8.

    Prince M, Bryce R, Albanese E, et al. The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(1):63–75.e2.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sherwin BB. Mild cognitive impairment: potential pharmacological treatment options. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:431–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Birks J, Flicker L. Donepezil for mild cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006.

  11. 11.

    Winblad B, Gauthier S, Scinto L, et al. Safety and efficacy of galantamine in subjects with mild cognitive impairment. Neurol. 2008;70(22):2024–35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Saunders NL, Summers MJ. Attention and working memory deficits in mild cognitive impairment. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010;32(4):350–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Petersen RC, Lopez O, Armstrong MJ, et al. Practice guideline update summary: mild cognitive impairment: report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurol. 2018;90(3):126–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Watari H, Shigyo M, Tanabe N, et al. Comparing the effects of kamikihito in Japan and kami-guibi-tang in Korea on memory enhancement: working towards the development of a global study. Phytother Res. 2015;29(3):351–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lee JY, Oh HK, Ryu HS et al. Efficacy and safety of the traditional herbal medicine, Gamiguibi-tang, in patients with cancer-related sleep disturbance: a prospective, randomized, wait-list-controlled, Pilot Study , Integr Cancer Ther 2018; 17(2):524–530.

  16. 16.

    Yuning W. The Chinese Meidince treatment of anorexia nervosa. J Chinese Med. 2019;119:57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Eom YW. Je Saengbang. Beijing: InMinwisaeng publisher; 1980. p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Heo J. Dong Ui Bo Gam. Seoul: Namsandang Publisher; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Terasawa K. Kampo Japanese-Oriental Medicine. Standard McIntyre: Tokyo; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tohda C, Nakada R, Urano T, et al. Kamikihi-to (KKT) rescues axonal and synaptic degeneration associated with memory impairment in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease, 5XFAD. Int J Neurosci. 2011;121:641–8.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Koji N, Hiroshi S, Nobuyoshi N. Effects of Kamikihi-to, a traditional chinese medicine on passive and conditioned avoidance performance impairment in senescence accelerated mouse (SAM). Jpn J Pharmacol. 1990;54(4):375–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Higashi K, Rakugi H, Yu H, et al. Effect of kihito extract granules on cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer’s-type dementia. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2007;7:245–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hidetoshi W, Yutaka S, Mie M, et al. Kihito, a traditional Japanese Kampo medicine, improves cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease patients. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med. 2019:1–7.

  24. 24.

    Shin HY, Kim JH, Jahng GH, et al. The effectiveness and safety of Kami-guibi-tang for mild cognitive impairment: study protocol of a pilot, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Trials. 2019;20(1):448.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kang Y, Na DL. Seoul neuropsychological screening battery (SNSB). Seoul: Human Brain Research & Consulting Co.; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kang Y, Jahng S, Na DL. Seoul neuropsychological screeening battery: 2nd ed (SNSB-II). Seoul: Human Brain Research & Consulting Co.; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ahn HJ, Chin J, Park A, et al. Seoul neuropsychological screening battery-dementia version (SNSB-D): a useful tool for assessing and monitoring cognitive impairments in dementia patients. J Korean Med Sci. 2010;25:1071–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Choi YJ, Won CW, Kim S, et al. Five items differentiate mild to severe dementia from normal to minimal cognitive impairment—using the global deterioration scale. J Clinical Gerontol Geriatr. 2016;7(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Morris JC. Clinical dementia rating: a reliable and valid diagnostic and staging measure for dementia of the Alzheimer type. Int Psychogeriatr. 1997;9(1):173–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Reisberg B, Ferris SH, de Leon MJ, et al. The global deterioration scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. Am J Psychiatry. 1982;139:1136–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10(2):64–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kang SJ, Choi SH, Lee BH, et al. The reliability and validity of the Korean instrumental activities of daily living (K-IADL). J Korean Neurol Assoc. 2002;20:8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lee SH, Kang MH, Kim CE, et al. Comparing various short-form geriatric depression scales in elderly psychiatric patients in Korea. J Korean Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;13:32–7.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kieser M, Wassmer G. On the use of the upper confidence limit for the variance from a pilot sample for sample size determination. Biom J. 1996;8:941–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Richard H. On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination. Stat Med. 1995;14(17):1933–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kim J, Na HK, Byun J, et al. Tracking cognitive decline in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and early-stage Alzheimer dementia: Mini-mental state examination versus neuropsychological battery. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2017;44:1–2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Doody RS, Ferris S, Salloway S, et al. Donepezil treatment of patients with MCI: a 48-week randomized, placebocontrolled trial. Neurology. 2009;72(18):1555–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, et al. Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheime’s disease: revising the NINCDSADRDA criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(8):734–46.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Park JH, Park H, Sohn SW, et al. Memory performance on the story recall test and prediction of cognitive dysfunction progression in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's dementia. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017;17(10):1603–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Thal LJ, Ferris SH, Kirby L, et al. A randomized, double-blind, study of rofecoxib in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005;30(6):1204–15.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Han JW, Kim TH, Lee SB, et al. Predictive validity and diagnostic stability of mild cognitive impairment subtypes. Alzheimers Dement. 2012;8:553–9.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Yabe T, Iizuka S, Komatsu Y, et al. Enhancements of choline acetyltransferase activity and nerve growth factor secretion by Polygalae radix-extract containing active ingredients in Kami-Untan-To. Phytomedicine. 1997;4:199–205.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Naito R, Tohda C. Characterization of anti-neurodegenerative effects of Polygala tenuifolia in a(25–35)-treated cortical neurons. Biol Pharm Bull. 2006;29(9):1892–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Watari H, Shimada Y, Tohda C. New treatment for alzheimer’s disease, kamikihito, reverses amyloid-β-induced progression of tau phosphorylation and axonal atrophy. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med. 2014:1–10.

  46. 46.

    Tian J, Shi J, Li T, et al. Efficacy and safety of an herbal therapy in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment: A 24-week randomized Phase III Trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2017;9.

  47. 47.

    Ishida K. Effect of donepezil and kamikihito combination therapy on cognitive function in Alzheimer’s disease: retrospective study. Tradit Kampo Med. 2016;3(2):94–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We sincerely thank all the collaborators and participants of the study.


This study was supported by the Convergence of Conventional Medicine and Traditional Korean Medicine R&D program as part of the national research project on dementia and funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (grant number: HI16C2352). The funding organization was not involved in any aspect of the study design, enrollment of participants, collection and analysis of data, interpretation of the results, nor in writing the manuscript.

Author information




PJM was the principal investigator. PJM, JGH, and JWS conceived and designed the study protocol. JC, KSW, CSY, PSU, MSK, and KCN also participated in the study design. KJH, SHY, and KHR recruited, enrolled, and assigned the participants to the interventions and acquired the data. SHY analyzed and interpreted the data and wrote the final manuscript. PJM monitored the overall process of the trial. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jung-Mi Park.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The trial was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki principles and the Korean Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The trial protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong (KHNMC-OH-IRB 2016–12–006-006) and by the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (31234). It has been registered at the Korean Clinical Trial Registry ( All patients provided written informed consent before enrollment.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional File 1.

CONSORT 2010 Checklist

Additional File 2.

Table S1. Construction of the SNSB-D

Additional File 3.

Table S2. Other indexes included in the SNSB-II

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shin, HY., Kim, HR., Jahng, GH. et al. Efficacy and safety of Kami-guibi-tang for mild cognitive impairment: a pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BMC Complement Med Ther 21, 251 (2021).

Download citation


  • Mild cognitive impairment
  • Amnestic mild cognitive impairment
  • Herbal medicine
  • Traditional Korean medicine
  • Kami-guibi-tang
  • Seoul neuropsychological screening battery
  • Clinical dementia rating