Skip to main content

In vitro activities of Acacia nilotica (L.) Delile bark fractions against Oral Bacteria, Glucosyltransferase and as antioxidant

Abstract

Background

Dental caries and periodontal disease are the most common chronic infectious oral diseases in the world. Acacia nilotica was commonly known in Sudan as Garad or Sunt has a wide range of medicinal uses. In the present study, antibacterial activity of oral bacteria (Streptococcus sobrinus and Porphyromonas gingivalis), inhibitory activity against glucosyltransferase (GTF) enzyme and antioxidant activity were assayed for methanolic crude extract of A. nilotica bark and its fractions.

Methods

Methanoilc crude extract of A. nilotica bark was applied to a Sephadex LH-20 column and eluted with methanol, aqueous methanol, and finally aqueous acetone to obtain four fractions (Fr1- Fr4). Furthermore, the crude extract and fractions were subjected to analytical high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The crude extract and its fractions were assayed for antibacterial activity against S. sobrinus and P. gingivalis using a microplate dilution assay method to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), as well as GTF inhibition and antioxidant activity using ABTS radical scavenging method.

Results

Fractions (Fr1 and Fr2) exhibited MIC values of 0.3 mg/ml against the P. gingivalis. Additionally, Fr2 displayed MBC value of 1 mg/ml against two types of bacteria. Fr4 showed an especially potent GTF inhibitory activity with IC50 value of 3.9 μg/ml. Fr1 displayed the best antioxidant activity with IC50 value of 1.8 μg/ml. The main compound in Fr1 was identified as gallic acid, and Fr2 was mostly a mixture of gallic acid and methyl gallate.

Conclusions

The results obtained in this study provide some scientific rationale and justify the use of this plant for the treatment of dental diseases in traditional medicine. A. nilotica bark, besides their antibacterial potentiality and GTF inhibitory activity, it may be used as adjuvant antioxidants in mouthwashes. Further studies in the future are required to identify the rest of the active compounds.

Peer Review reports

Background

Dental caries is an irreversible localized infection that results in progressive tooth decay [1]. It’s a common type of dental disease associated with microorganisms present on the tooth surface in dental plaque. One of the main etiologic factors of dental caries is considered to be Streptococcus sobrinus, which belong to the gram-positive mutans streptococci group. The presence of S. sobrinus is relatively higher on the molars compared to the anterior teeth [1, 2]. Several epidemiological studies have shown that the prevalence of S. sobrinus is more closely associated with high caries activities [3]. S. sobrinus can colonize the tooth surface and initiate plaque formation by synthesizing water-insoluble glucan from sucrose by glucosyltransferases (GTF), resulting in a firm attachment to the tooth surface and form lactic and other organic acids by fermentation of various sugars in foods [4]. Different strategies for preventing dental caries caused by cariogenic bacteria, such as depression of the growth of streptococcus, inhibition of GTF activity, and hydrolysis of glucans by enzymes, have been developed [5]. Further accumulation of plaque around the gingival margin and subgingival region may lead to shifts in the balance of the microflora from mainly gram-positive bacteria to gram-negative bacteria, and an increased number of gram-negative anaerobic bacteria will cause the development of periodontal diseases [6].

Periodontal diseases are chronic inflammatory disorders of bacterial origin that affect tooth-supporting tissues [7]. Over 700 bacterial species that have been identified in the oral cavity [8], only a few are associated with periodontitis, including Porphyromonas gingivalis [9]. P. gingivalis is a gram-negative bacterium closely associated with chronic periodontitis. High numbers of P. gingivalis, together with other periodontopathogens, induce a host immune response, which in turn leads to a destructive inflammatory process.

Oxidative stress observed in a diseased periodontium could result directly from excess reactive oxygen species (ROS) activity or antioxidant deficiency or indirectly by creating a pro-inflammatory state. Some studies reported that the excess production of ROS resulted in damages of gingival tissues, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone [10,11,12]. Therefore, the search for an antioxidant that could be used to control these diseases as polyphenolic compounds are likely candidates [13].

Acacia nilotica (L.) Delile sub nilotica (Leguminosae) is a tree found in the central and northern parts of Sudan and is known in Sudanese folk medicine by the common name ‘Garad or Sunt.’ The fruit and the stem bark are regarded as a tonic and astringent and are used internally to treat colds, bronchitis, pneumonia, diarrhea, and dysentery [14, 15]. Fractionation of A. nilotica leaves and bark showed the presence of phenols condensed tannin [16], gallic acid, (+) catechin, (−) epigallocatechin-7-g’allate, catechin derivatives [17, 18], ellagic acid, kaempferol, and quercetin [19]. Parallelly many researches demonstrated its wide array of pharmacological activities, such as anti- HIV-1 protease [20], antibacterial [21], antioxidant, anticarcinogenic [22, 23] and anti-inflammatory activities [24]. In Sudanese and Indian traditional medicine, gargle the decoction of the A. nilotica bark is used to strengthens teeth and eliminates toothache [25,26,27]. Even though there is a little investigation on the potential beneficial effects of A. nilotica bark on oral health. Thus, we evaluated the effects of A. nilotica bark methanolic extract and its fractions on the growth of two oral bacteria included S. sobrinus and P. gingivalis. We also investigated their GTF inhibitory activity and antioxidant functions for oral hygiene purposes.

Methods

Reagents

All materials purchased from (Wako-Japan) except p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet from (Sigma-Aldrich-Japan).

Plant materials and extraction

A. nilotica bark was collected from Sennar State, Sudan in May 2013 and then authenticated by the University of Khartoum, Faculty of Forest. Voucher specimens (SD-SS-01) are deposited in the Horticultural Laboratory, Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum. A. nilotica bark was shade dried and powdered before being extracted with methanol for 12 h three times. The extracts were filtered through Whatman No. 2 filter paper, and the solvent was removed under vacuum using a rotary evaporator.

Fractionation of A. nilotica bark

The crude extract (400 mg /2 ml of 50% methanol) was applied to a Sephadex LH-20 column. The column was eluted with methanol (250 ml), methanol-water (80:20, v/v; 150 ml, Fr1), methanol-water (50:50, v/v; 250 ml, Fr2), methanol-water (5:95, v/v; 100 ml, Fr3) and finally acetone-water (70:30, v/v; 250 ml, Fr4). The fractions (Fr1–4) were concentrated in vacuo (38 °C) and freeze-dried to give four powders with approximate weights of 34.2 mg, 35.7 mg, 44.8 mg, and 244.5 mg for Fr1, Fr2, Fr3, and Fr4 respectively. Furthermore, the crude extract and fractions were subjected to high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with reversed-phase column C18 (Sunniest 4.5 mm i.d. X 250 mm). The solvent system used was as follows: a gradient program for 65 min from 5 to 100% methanol in water with 0.05% TFA (Trifluoroacetic acid) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min, monitored at 280 nm.

Antibacterial activity assay

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by the broth dilution method [28]. S. sobrinus 6715 and P. gingivalis ATCC 33277 were cultured in brain heart infusion broth. For P. gingivalis broth supplemented with 0.5 μg/ml vitamin K3 and 5 μg/ml hemin. The samples were tested for antibacterial activity in sterile 96-well plates. The inoculums were prepared by diluting the broth culture to 106cell/ml for S. sobrinus and 108cell/ml for P. gingivalis approximately. The experiments were performed in triplicate. Chlorhexidine was included in the assay as a positive control. Then cultures were incubated 24 h for S. sobrinus and 72 h for P. gingivalis at 37 °C under anaerobic condition. Microbial growth was indicated by adding 50 μl of (0.2 mg/ml) p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet (INT) to culture and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration that inhibited the color change of INT [29]. For minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), 10 μl from wells that showed no color change were transferred to 100 μl of fresh media and then incubated for 24 h under the anaerobic condition at 37 °C. Microbial growth was also indicated by adding INT to culture. The MBC was defined as the lowest concentration that inhibited the color change of INT.

Preparation of glucosyltransferase (GTF)

S. sobrinus 6715 was grown for 20 h at 37 °C in 4 L of Todd Hewitt broth. After centrifugation of the culture at 1300 g for 10 min at 4 °C, the cells were collected and then extracted with 8 M urea for 1 h with stirring. The crude enzyme solution containing urea was dialyzed against 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6) until the urea was removed entirely. One milliliter of the crude enzyme solution was pipetted into a microtube and stored in a freezer at − 80 °C [30].

GTF inhibitory activity assay

Insoluble glucan synthesized by GTF was measured turbidimetrically. GTF was incubated in 300 μl of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) containing 1% sucrose, 0.5% dextran T-10, and in the presence or absence of samples at 37 °C for 3 h. The volume of the crude GTF solution used in the assay was determined by absorbance of around 1.0 at 590 nm. Chlorhexidine was used as a positive control [30]. The inhibition rate is expressed by the following equation: Inhibition (%) = 100 × (Ac – As)/Ac.

Where.

Ac: Absorbance of the control.

As: Absorbance of the sample.

ABTS radical scavenging activity assay

2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid diammonium salt) was dissolved in water to make a concentration of 7 mM. ABTS+ was produced by reacting to the ABTS stock solution with 2.45 mM potassium persulfate and allowing the mixture to stand in the dark at room temperature for 12–16 h before use. For the study of samples, the ABTS+ was diluted with phosphate-buffered saline 5 mM, pH 7.4 to obtain an absorbance of 0.70 at 734 nm. After the addition of 980 μl of diluted ABTS to 20 μl of samples, the absorbance reading was taken five minutes after the initial mixing [31]. Trolox was used as a positive control. The activity was measured as follows:

% ABTS scavenging activity =.

[(control absorbance – sample absorbance)/ (control absorbance)] × 100.

Statistical analysis

The inhibitory activity of GTFs and antioxidant activities were expressed as the mean (mean ± standard deviation) value. The significant differences between samples were assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by pairwise comparison of the mean using Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Values were determined to be significant when p was less than 0.05 (p<0.05).

Results

Chromatogram data

Typical chromatograms of crude methanolic extract and fractions are shown in Fig. 1. The chromatographic peaks of Fr1 and Fr2 were identified according to a commercial standard of gallic acid (GA) and methyl gallate (MG) (Figs. 2, 3). Therefore, the Fr1 contained a GA at the retention time 9.9 min as the main compound. Fr2 contained a mixture of GA and MG at the retention time 9.9 and 16.8 min, respectively, in addition to unknown compound at the retention time of 41.6 min. In contrast, compounds in the other fractions are still unidentified.

Fig. 1
figure1

HPLC chromatogram of Acacia nilotica crude extract and its fractions (F1-F4)

Fig. 2
figure2

Molecular structure of gallic acid and methyll gallate. A: Gallic acid. B: Methyll gallate

Fig. 3
figure3

HPLC chromatogram of isolated fractions from A. nilotica (F1 and F2) and commercial standard (GASD: Gallic acid standard; MGSD: Methyl gallate standard)

Antibacterial activity

In this study, the antibacterial MIC and MBC values of the A. nilotica bark and it’s fractions against S. sobrinus and P. gingivalis using dilution methods were presented in Table 1. The MIC values of 0.5 mg/ml or less were considered as good antibacterial activity. Generally, Fr2, Fr1 and crude extract demonstrated good MIC values against S. sobrinus and P. gingivalis. MIC value of 0.3 mg/ml was observed when Fr1 and Fr2 were used against P. gingivalis. Fr2 showed the best antibacterial activity against the two types of bacteria. Positive control demonstrated the most potent inhibition activity against the two types of bacteria.

Table 1 Antibacterial activities of Acacia nilotica bark and their fractions against Streptococcus sobrinus and Porphyromonas gingivalis

GTF inhibitory activity

Fraction four (Fr4), methanolic crude extracts of A. nilotica bark, and Fr3 at the concentration of 100 μg/ml inhibited GTF secreted from S. sobrinus to a remarkable extent with more than 85% inhibitions (Table 2). Judging from the IC50 values; Fr4, and methanolic crude extracts showed remarkable inhibition of GTF activity with IC50 values of 3.9 and 8.4 μg/ml, respectively (Table 2). Chlorhexidine, as a positive control, showed good activity against GTF.

Table 2 The inhibitory activities of Acacia nilotica bark and their fractions against glucosyEltransferase (GTFs) enzyme

ABTS radical scavenging activity

IC50 value is the effective concentration at which antioxidant activity is 50%. The ABTS radical scavenging activity (IC50) of crude extracts and fractions were ranged between 0.8–5.2 μg/ml (Fig. 4). The results also revealed that Fr1 had a significant antioxidant activity with an IC50 value of 0.8 μg/ml compared to the trolox as a positive control (2.1 μg/ml). As described previously, the gallic acid was the main compound in this Fraction. Fraction three (Fr3) also demonstrated an excellent antioxidant activity in which there were no significant differences between Fr3 (3.1 μg/ml) and positive control.

Fig. 4
figure4

Free radical scavenging properties of A. nilotica bark and its fractions by using ABTS photometric assay. Values not followed by a common letter were significantly different at the level (p < 0.05)

Discussion

Chromatogram data

HPLC analysis is the best way for the chemical profiling of plant extract. The described method showed relatively good separation of specific fractions. Identification of phenolic compounds in methanolic extract of A. nilotica bark was carried out by using the available standards (GA and MG) as shown in Fig. 3. In the present study, Fr1 and F2 contained a GA and mixture GA and MG respectively. These results were in agreement with Sharma et al. [32] and Leela et al. [33]. They isolated and purified GA and MGfrom A. nilotica bark through open column chromatography and HPTLC. In contrast, Sadiqa et al. [34] reported that quantification of bark extract of A. nilotica collected from Pakistan by using HPLC/DAD showed that catechin, isoquercetin, tannic acid and quercetin contained in considerable quantities. However, the gallic acid was found in leaves and pods only. Also, Zhang and Lin [35] stated that the broad peaks in HPLC chromatogram spectra indicated that there was a large structural heterogeneity with different degrees of polymerization. Fr4 HPLC chromatogram contains a broad peak after 17 min retention time (Fig. 1). This broad peak was suggested to be a mixture of higher molecular weight of proanthocyanidins (condensed tannins).

Antibacterial properties

Several authors suggested that the effective antimicrobial agents from herbal extracts along with their derived materials against cariogenic and periodontopathic bacteria, could form an important part preventing dental caries and periodontal diseases [36, 37]. Gibbons [38] suggested that isolated phytochemicals should have MIC< 1 mg/ml, therefore in this study MIC value of 0.5 mg/ml or less for S. sobrinus and P. gingivalis was considered as a good antibacterial. Even though gram-negative bacteria are more resistant than gram-positive due to the presence of outer membrane, which acts as a barrier to environmental substances, including antibiotics [39, 40]. The observed activity of Fr1 and Fr2 against gram-negative bacteria (P. gingivalis) could be explained by the fact that the active compounds might act by inhibiting the bacterial growth without necessarily penetrating into the bacterial cell itself [41]. In earlier studies, extracts of the A. nilotica pods displayed antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus with MIC value of 0.4 mg/ml. Abdel Nabi et al. [21] suggested that the antimicrobial activity of A. nilotica fruit extract (MIC = 0.05–1.6 mg/ml) was not due to tannins but to another substance(s). A. nilotica bark and leaves showed good antibacterial activities against some gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria [42,43,44]. Furthermore, A. nilotica bark has been shown to contain simple phenolic compounds like GA and MG, which have often been implicated in antibacterial activity. Deshpande and Kadam [45] reported that ethanol extract of A. nilotica bark showed activity against S. mutans with MIC value of 5 mg/ml. The results obtained in this study are similar to Kang et al. [46], who reported that both GA and MG had inhibitory effects on the growth of cariogenic (MIC = 8 mg/ml) and periodontopathic bacteria (MIC = 1 mg/ml). Hence, MG and GA might be used to prevent the formation of oral biofilms. However, MG was more effective in inhibiting bacterial growth and formation of S. mutans biofilm than GA.

Enzyme inhibitory activity

Mutans streptococci group colonize at the tooth enamel surface and initiate plaque formation by their ability to make extracelluar polysaccharides from sucrose using glucosyltransferase which is a major component in the development of dental caries [47]. The previous report mentioned that methanolic extracts of A. nilotica bark contained a considerable amount of condensed tannins [48]. The HPLC chromatogram of F4 indicated the presence of condensed tannins. This type of tannin is available in barks, oolong tea, green tea and grape seed, which are potent GTF inhibitors owing to their polyphenolic moiety being able to form hydrogen bonds with GTF [5]. Besides, high molecular weight plant polyphenols displaying strong anti-GTF activity have a common structural feature shared with catechin-based oligomeric forms (condensed tannins) [49]. Chlorhexidine showed potent inhibitory activities against two types of bacteria and GTF enzyme. However, it has been reported that chlorhexidine is cytotoxic to human periodontal ligament cells, inhibits protein synthesis, and affects mitochondrial activity, thus having detrimental effects on vital tissues [50, 51].

Antioxidant activity

The role of antioxidants is to remove harmful oxidants or (ROS) as soon as they form or to repair the damage caused by ROS. Numerous antioxidants have been tried and tested both by systemic administration and as mouthwashes. These include synthetic products like vitamins to natural products like wine and green tea [52, 53]. Additionally, few studies were carried out on the antioxidant activity of oral hygiene products. Battino et al. [54] showed that a few antioxidant-enriched toothpastes displayed a clear antioxidant activity. In vivo assay, Tamaki et al. [55] stated that the oral administration of resveratrol improves oxidative stress and prevents the progression of periodontitis in a rat periodontitis model. In this study, the antioxidant assay is based on the ability of an antioxidant to scavenge ABTS radicals. It is a simple, rapid and inexpensive antioxidant assay usually used for the evaluation of antioxidant capacity [56]. The ABTS radical is soluble in water and organic solvents, enabling the determination of the antioxidant capacity of both hydrophilic and lipophilic samples [57]. The finding in this study agreed with Sohi et al. [58]. They stated that pretreatment of peripheral blood lymphocytes with gallic acid effectively inhibit lipid peroxidation and apoptosis induced by oxidative stress and it was found to be a stronger antiradical than trolox.

Furthermore, our results support the reports of Sultana et al.; Singh and Arora [59, 60] who reported that A. niloica bark extracts showed a strong antioxidant activity by using DPPH radical scavenging activity assay. Houde et al. [13] demonstrated that proanthocyanidins contained in grape seed extracts were potent antioxidant properties and should be considered a potential agent in the prevention of periodontal diseases. So, it is not surprising that our extract, which is rich in polyphenolic compounds, possessed high antioxidant activity and it could be used for oral hygiene.

Therefore in the present study, we showed that the crude extract of A. nilotica and their fractions can affect bacterial and GTF enzyme viability. Furthermore, some fractions showed significant antioxidant activity. The might be proposed mechanisms of action to explain the crude extract or their fractions antimicrobial activities, including direct action on microbial metabolism through inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation or inhibition of extracellular microbial enzymes required for microbial growth. Another overlooked advantage of GTF-targeting inhibitors is their potential to possess anti-biofilm activity without being (with less) bactericidal, thus providing alternative methods to prevent biofilm-related diseases with minimal effect on the ecological balance in the microbial community [61]. Also, Jeon et al. [62] reported that caries antagonistic activity of antioxidants polyphenols had been attributed to three main mechanisms (i) Direct antimicrobial effect by killing the responsible bacteria, (ii) Inhibition of extracellular polysaccharide production, and (iii) Impairment of bacterial adhesion.

Conclusions

The results of the present study suggest that besides antibacterial potentiality and GTF inhibitory activity of A. nilotica bark may be used as adjuvant antioxidants in mouthwashes and may provide treatment strategies for periodontal diseases in the future. However, additional tests including identify the rest of the active compounds, cytotoxicity assay, experimental models and the pharmacological applicability are required soon.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets that support the conclusions of this article are included in the article.

Abbreviations

GTF:

Glucosyltransferases; ROS: reactive oxygen species

Fr:

Fractions

HPLC:

High performance liquid chromatography

TFA:

Trifluoroacetic acid

MIC:

Minimum inhibitory concentration

INT:

P-iodonitrotetrazolium violet

MBC:

Minimum bactericidal concentration

ABTS:

2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid diammonium salt)

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

GA:

Gallic acid

MG:

Methyl gallate

DPPH:

1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl

References

  1. 1.

    Lindquest B, Emilson CG. Dental location of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus in humans harborin both species. Caries Res. 1991;25:146–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Schupbach P, Osterwalder V, Guggenheim B. Human roots caries: microbiota in plaque covering sound, carious and arrested carious root surfaces. Caries Res. 1995;29:382–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Fujiwara T, Sasada EE, Mima N, Ooshima T. Caries prevalence and salivary mutans streptococci in 0–2 year old children of Japan. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1991;19:151–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sawamura S, Tonosaki Y, Hamada S. Inhibitory effect of ellagic acid on glucosyltransferase from mutans streptococci. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1992;56:766–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kuspradini H, Ohashi H, Mitsunaga T. Antimicrobial activity against Streptococcus sobrinus and glucosyltransferase inhibitory activity of taxifolin and some flavanonol rhamnosides from kempas (Koompassia malaccensis) extracts. J Wood Sci. 2009;55:308–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Marsh PD. Microbial ecology of dental plaque and its significance in health and disease. Adv Dent Res. 1994;8:263–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Highfield J. Diagnosis and classification of periodontal disease. Aust Dent J. 2009;54:11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Aas JA, Paster BJ, Stokes LN, Olsen I, Dewhirst FE. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:5721–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Holt SC, Ebersole JL. Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia: the "red complex", a prototype polybacterial pathogenic consortium in periodontitis. Periodontol. 2000;2005(38):72–122.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Batista AC, Silva TA, Chun JH, Lara VS. Nitric oxide synthesis and severity of human periodontal disease. Oral Dis. 2002;8:254–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Tsai CC, Chen HS, Chen SL, Ho YP, Ho KY, Wu YM, Hung CC. Lipid peroxidation: a possible role in the induction and progression of chronic periodontitis. J Periodontal Res. 2005;40:378–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Canakci CF, Cicek Y, Canakci V. Reactive oxygen species and human inflammatory periodontal diseases. Biochemistry (Mosc). 2005;70:619–28.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Houde V, Grenier D, Chandad F. Protective effects of grape seed proanthocyanidins against oxidative stress induced by lipopolysaccharides of periodontopathogens. J Periodontol. 2006;77:1371–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Pousset JL. Plantes medicinales africaines utilisation practique. Paris: Agence de cooperation culturelle et technique; 1989. p. 13–5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Watt JM, Breyer-Brandwijk MG. The medicinal and poisonous plants of southern and eastern Africa. Edinburgh: Livingstone Ltd; 1962. p. 546.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Mnisi CM, Mlambo V. Influence of harvesting site on chemical composition and potential protein value of Acacia erioloba, A. nilotica and Ziziphus mucronata leaves for ruminants. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2016;5:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12535.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kaur K, Michael H, Arora S, Härkönen P, Kumar S. In vitro bioactivity-guided fractionation and characterization of polyphenolic inhibitory fractions from Acacia nilotica (L.) Willd. Ex Del. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;99:353–60.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Singh R, Singh B, Singh S, Kumar N, Kumar S, Arora S. Anti-free radical activities of kaempferol isolated from Acacia nilotica (L.) Willd, ex. Del. Toxicolo In Vitro. 2008;22:1965–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Al-Nour MY, Ibrahim MM, Elsaman T. Ellagic acid, kaempferol, and quercetin from Acacia nilotica: promising combined drug with multiple mechanisms of action. Curr Pharmacol Rep. 2019;5:255–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40495-019-00181-w.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hussein G, Miyashiro H, Nakamura N, Hattori M, Kawahata T, Otake T, Kakiuchi N, Shimotohno K. Inhibitory effects of Sudanese medicinal plant extracts on HIV-1 replication and HIV-1 protease. Phytother Res. 1999;13:31–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Abdel Nabi OM, Reisinger EC, Reinthaler FF, Still F, Eibel U, Krejs GJ. Antimicrobial activity of Acacia nilotica (L.) Willd. Ex Del. Var. nilotica (Mimosaceae). J Ethnopharmacol. 1992;37:77–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Maldini M, Montoro P, Al H, Mahalel UA, Oleszek W, Stochmal A, Piacente S. Strong antioxidant phenolics from A nilotica: profiling by ESI-MS and qualitative- quantitative determination by LC-ESI-MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2011;56:228–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Pattnaik S, Mani S, Rajkumari J. SJ Sudharshan, Madhu D, Busi S. determination of antioxidant potential of Acacia nilotica leaf extract in oxidative stress response system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Sci Food Agric. 2017;15:5247–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8409.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Dafallah AA, Al-Mustafa Z. Investigation of the anti-inflammatory activity of Acacia nilotica and Hibiscus sabdariffa. Am J Chin Medi. 1996;24:263–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kabbashi AS, Garbi MI, Osaman EE. Antigiardial, antioxidant activities and cytotoxicity of ethanolic extract of leaves of Acacia nilotica (L). Adv Med Plant Res. 2015;3:33–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Van Wky B, Van Wky P, Van Wky BE. Photographic guide to tree of southern Africa. Pertoria: Briza publications; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ali A, Akhtar N, Khan BA, Khan MS, Rasul A, Zaman SU, Khaild N, Wasseem K, Mahmood T, Ali L. Acacia nilotica: a plant of multipurpose medicinal uses. J Med Plant Res. 2012:61492–6.

  28. 28.

    Iwaki K, Koya-Miyata S, Kohno K, Ushio S, Fukuda S. Antimicrobial activity of Polygonum tinctorium Lour: extract against oral pathogenic bacteria. J Nat Med. 2006;60:121–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Eloff JN. Antibacterial activity of Marula (Sclerocarya birrea(a.rich) Hochst. Subsp. caffra (Sond) Kokwaro)(Anacardiaceae) bark and leaves. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;76:305–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Mitsunaga T, Abe I, Kontani M, Ono H, Tanaka T. Inhibitory effects of bark proanthocyanidins on the activities of glucosyltransferases of Streptococcus sobrinus. J Wood Chem Technol. 1997;17:327–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Fellegrin N, Ke R, Yang M, Rice-Evans C. Screening of dietary carotenoids and carotenoid-rich fruit extracts for antioxidant activities applying 2, 2′-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) radical cation decolorization assay. Methods Enzymol. 1999;299:379–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Sharma M, Gupta AK, Mukherji A. Invasive Acacia nilotica a problematic weed is a source of potent methyl gallate. IJSR. 2014;10:1193–5.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Leela V, Kokila L, Lavanya R, Saraswathy A, Brindha P. Determination of gallic acid in Acacia nilotica Linn. By HPTLC. IJPT. 2010;2:285–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sadiq MB, Hanpithakpong W, Tarning J, Anala AK. Screening of phytochemicals and in vitro evaluation of antibacterial and antioxidant activities of leaves, pods and bark extracts of Acacia nilotica (L.) Del. Ind Crop Prod. 2015;77:873–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Zhang LL, Lin YM. Tannins from Canarium album with potent antioxidant activity. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2008;5:407–15.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Watanabe T, Katayama S, Matsubara M, Honda Y, Kuwahara M. Antibacterial carbohydrate monoesters suppressing cell growth of Streptococcus mutans in the presence of sucrose. Curr Microbiol. 2000;41:210–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kim JE, Kim HE, Hwang JK, Lee HJ, Kwon HK, Kim BI. Antibacterial characteristics of Curcuma xanthorrhiza extract on Streptococcus mutans biofilm. J Microbiol. 2008;46:228–32.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Gibbons S. Plants as a source of bacterial resistance modulators and anti-infective agents. Phytochem Rev. 2005;4:63–78.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Rabe T, Van Staden J. Antibacterial activity of south African plants used for medicinal purposes. J Ethnopharmacol. 1997;56:81–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Palombo EA, Semple SJ. Antibacterial activity of traditional Australian medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001;77:151–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Mulaudzi R, Ndhlala A, Kulkarni M, Finnie J, Van Staden J. Antimicrobial properties and phenolic contents of medicinal plants used by the Venda people for conditions related to venereal diseases. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;135:330–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Sharma C, Aneja KR, Surain P, Dhiman R, Jiloha P, Meashi V, Kaur M. In vitro evaluation of anti-microbial spectrum of Acacia nilotica leaves and bark extracts against pathogens causing otitis infection. J Innov Biol. 2014;1:51–6.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Patel JD, Shrivastava AK, Kumar V. Evaluation of some medicinal plants used in traditional wound healing preparations for antibacterial property against some pathogenic bacteria. J Clin Immunol Immunopathol Res. 2009;1:7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Deshpande SN. Preliminary phytochemical analysis and in vitro investigation of antibacterial activity of Acacia nilotica against clinical isolates. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2013;5:23–7.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Deshpande SN, Kadam DG. Photochemical analysis and antibacterial activity of Acacia nilotica against Streptococcus mutans. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2012;1:236–8.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Kang MS, Oh JS. Kang IC, Hong SJ, Choi CH. Inhibitory effect of methyl gallate and gallic acid on oral bacteria. J Microbiol. 2008;46:744–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Jacquelin LF, Brisset L, Magrex EL, Carquin J, Gelle MP, Choisy C. Prevention of cariogenic dental plaque. Study of the structures implicated in the adhesion and coaggregation in Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus. Pathol Biol (Paris). 1995;43:371–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Muddathir AM, Mitsunaga T. Evaluation of anti-acne activity of selected Sudanese medicinal plants. J Wood Sci. 2013;59:73–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Yanagida A, Kanda T, Tanabe M, Matsudaira F, Oliveira Cordeiro JG. Inhibitory effects of apple polyphenols and related compounds on cariogenic factors of mutans streptococci. J Agric Food Chem. 2000;48:5666–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Chang YC, Huang FM, Tai KW, Chou MY. The effect of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine on cultured human periodontal ligament cells. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;92:446–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Beaudouin E, Kanny G, Morisset M, Renaudin JM, Mertes M, Laxenarie MC, Mouton C, Jacson F, Moneret-Vautrin DA. Immediate hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine: literature review. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;36:123–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Atsumi T, Tonosaki K, Fujisawa S. Salivary free radical scavenging activity is affected by physical and mental activities. Oral Dis. 2008;14:490–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Diab-Ladki R, Pellat B, Chahine R. Decrease in the total antioxidant activity of saliva in patients with periodontal diseases. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7:103–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Battino M, Bullon P, Wilson M, Newman H. Oxidative injury and inflammatory periodontal diseases: the challenge of anti-oxidants to free radicals and reactive oxygen species. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1999;10:458–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Tamaki N, Cristina Orihuela-Campos R, Inagaki Y, Fukui M, Nagata T, Ito HO. Resveratrol improves oxidative stress and prevents the progression of periodontitis via the activation of the Sirt1/AMPK and the Nrf2/antioxidant defense pathways in a rat periodontitis model. Free Radic Biol Med. 2014;75:222–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Gan RY, Kuang L, Xu XR, Zhang Y, Xia EQ, Song FL, Li HB. Screening of natural antioxidants from traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with treatment of rheumatic disease. Molecules. 2010;15:5988–97.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Mohamed SA, Khan JA. Antioxidant capacity of chewing stick miswak Salvadora persica. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013;40:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Sohi KK, Mittal N, Hundal MK, Khanduja KL. Gallic acid, an antioxidant, exhibits antiapoptotic potential in normal human lymphocytes: a Bcl-2 independent mechanism. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2003;49:221–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Sultana B, Anwar F, Przybylski R. Antioxidant activity of phenolic components present in barks of Azadirachta indica, Terminalia arjuna, Acacia nilotica, and Eugenia jambolana lam. Trees. Food Chem. 2007;104:1106–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Singh R, Arora S. Attenuation of free radicals by acetone extract /fractions of Acacia nilotica (L.) Willd. Ex del. J Chin Clin Med. 2007;4:196–204.

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Zhi R, Chen L, Li J, Li Y. Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans polysaccharide synthesis by molecules targeting glycosyltransferase activity. J Oral Microbiol. 2016;8:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3402/jom.v8.31095.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Jeon JG, Rosalen PL, Falsetta ML, Koo H. Natural products in caries research: current (limited) knowledge, challenges and future perspective. Caries Res. 2011;45:243–63. https://doi.org/10.1159/000327250.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Enas Y. Abdel Kareem from the University of Khartoum, Faculty of Forest, for her assistance in plant identification and authentications. A. M and EBMM acknowledge for Gifu University, Japan.

Funding

No fund was available.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.M participated in the design of the study, collection and extraction of plant sample, fractionation process, and wrote the manuscript. E.A.M.M participated in antibacterial, enzyme assay and helped to draft the manuscript. T. M supervised and designs this study. All the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Mahmoud Muddathir.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muddathir, A.M., Mohieldin, E.A.M. & Mitsunaga, T. In vitro activities of Acacia nilotica (L.) Delile bark fractions against Oral Bacteria, Glucosyltransferase and as antioxidant. BMC Complement Med Ther 20, 360 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-020-03147-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Streptococcus sobrinus
  • Porphyromonas gingivalis
  • Glucosyltransferase enzyme
  • Acacia nilotica
  • ABTS radical scavenging