Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Neuro-protective effect of rutin against Cisplatin-induced neurotoxic rat model

Abstract

Background

Cisplatin is widely used chemotherapeutic agent for cancer treatment with limited uses due to its neurotoxic side effect. The aim of this study was to determine the potential preventive effects of rutin on the brain of cisplatin- neurotoxic rat model.

Methods

Forty rats were divided into four groups. Group-1 (control group) was intra-peritoneal (IP) injected with 2.5 ml/kg saline. Group-2 (rutin group) was orally administrated 30 mg/kg rutin dissolved in water for 14 days. Group-3 (cisplatin group) was IP received 5 mg/kg cisplatin single dose. Group-4 (rutin and cisplatin group) was orally administrated 30 mg/kg rutin dissolved in water for 14 days with a single dose of 5 mg/kg cisplatin IP on day ten. Brain tissues from frontal cortex was used to extract RNA, the gene expression levels of paraoxonase-1 (PON-1), PON-2, PON-3, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta (PPAR-δ), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) was investigated by Real-time PCR.

Results

Cisplatin significantly decreased the expression levels of PON-1, PON-3, PPAR-δ and GPX whereas significantly increased PON-2 expression levels. Co-administration of Rutin prevented the cisplatin-induced toxicity by restoring the alteration in the studied genes to normal values as in the control group.

Conclusion

This study showed that Rutin has neuroprotective effect and reduces cisplatin- neurotoxicity with possible mechanism via the antioxidant pathway.

Peer Review reports

Background

Platinum-based compounds, such as cisplatin, are part of standard treatment for various cancers [1]. Cisplatin is an old drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1978 [2, 3], then it becomes one of the most commonly prescribed anti-cancer drugs. Cisplatin causes cell-cycle arrest leading to apoptosis [4], but the core mechanism is not only its ability to covalently bind to DNA but also to a broad range of essential RNA molecules. Recent near atomic resolution study showed that cisplatin interacts with various RNA sites in the ribosome [5].

Cisplatin-related side effects (ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity and cerebral disorders) limits its clinical use at the desired dosage [6, 7]. Several studied have investigated the mechanisms of cisplatin toxicity but the mechanisms for induction of peripheral neuropathies is poorly understood [8,9,10]. One study showed the ability of cisplatin to penetrate into the brain where it inhibits neuronal stem cell proliferation [11]. Cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity leads to dose reduction or early termination of chemotherapy that can affect patient life [12, 13]. Cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity via oxidative damage, inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, DNA damage, and apoptosis in the nervous system [11, 12]. Cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity through the formation of nucleoli abnormalities in the spinal root ganglion cells of rat embryo [14, 15]. The cisplatin side effects on both human and animal nervous systems can be proven with electrophysiological and histopathological experiments [5, 7, 9]. Chronic cisplatin administration leads to severe damage in spinal ganglia neurons and decreases cell size [16] via interference of platinum with DNA synthesis [4].

Paraoxonase (PONs) is a multigene family composed of three members (PON1, PON2, PON3) coded for enzymes capable of hydrolyzing organophosphate compounds; and plays a role in inflammation and oxidative stress [17]. The enzymes of PONs have anti-atherogenic role through its ability to retard the oxidation of LDL [18]. PON1 is paraoxonase/arylesterase that hydrolyses a broad range of substrates and is a lactonase with lipophilic lactones substrates [19]. PON2 hydrolyses and inactivates N-acyl-homoserine lactones. PON1 gene is expressed in brain [20] and PON2 gene is expressed in lungs, heart, liver and brain, but is not detected in blood [21]. PON3 can hydrolyse bulky drug substrates, such as lovastatin and spironolactone [19]. PON1 and PON3 are synthesized in liver and are attached to high-density lipoproteins (HDL) in blood [22, 23].

Oxidative stress has an important role in toxicity produced by different drugs such as doxorubicin and cisplatin [24, 25]. Cisplatin produces oxidative stress through reduction of plasma antioxidant enzymes levels such as catalase, glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase leading to a failure of the antioxidant defense against free radical damage generated by antitumor drugs [26]. DNA damage and inflammatory cytokines are major players in cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity [27]. The increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) react with DNA to permit the formation of 8-hydroxy guanine causing damage to DNA [28]. The excess generation of ROS increases the damage of biomolecules resulting in lipid peroxidation.

Antioxidants play a vital role in inhibiting the generation of free radicals subsequently preventing the oxidative damage. The antioxidants are naturally present in the body, while others have to be provided as supplements. Several antioxidant agent can reduce the cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity. Parsley oil, with its antioxidant activity, used in the treatment of cisplatin-induced hepatic and cardiac injuries [29]. Other study found that ceftriaxone displayed protective efficacy against cisplatin-induced renal tubule-interstitial fibrosis, possibly via anti-fibrotic potential [30]. Other natural product such as honey bee and royal jelly could be used as dietary preventive natural products against subchronic cisplatin-induced renal injury [31]. Flavonoids are poly-phenolic compounds with anti-inflammatory, antiviral, antibacterial, and neuroprotective properties [32].

Rutin, a flavonoid glycoside, found in vegetables, fruits, tea and herbs [33]. Moreover, rutin possess different protective effects including antioxidant, anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory properties [34]. Interestingly, several studies showed that rutin significantly reduced the cisplatin-induced oxidative stress via decreasing lipid peroxidation and increasing antioxidant activity [35,36,37]. Also, rutin has a protective effect against doxorubicin-induced memory deficits and has neuroprotective effects in streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats [38, 39]. In addition, it has a protective function in ischemic organs including the heart and brain [40]. Rats are used as models of human disease because the rats provide many advantages over other organisms, including the size of their body and substructures in organs. In addition, the ability to measure drug effects at specific anatomical areas [41]. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the possible protective effect of the rutin via studying some genes of the antioxidant pathway in the brain tissues of cisplatin-induced neurotoxic rat model.

Methods

Animals

The experiments were carried out on six-week-old male Wistar rats weighing 230– 260 g obtained from the Animal Care Center, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The animals were kept under standard conditions of temperature (22 ± 1 °C), humidity (50–55%), and a 12-h light/dark cycle, with free access to standard laboratory feed and water, according to the study protocol. All methods were conducted according to the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, National Institute of Health (NIH publication No. 80–23; 1996). The Experimental Animal Care Center Review Board, college of pharmacy, King Saud University Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, approved the protocol included in this study (number E.A.C.B -5/2017).

Chemicals

Cisplatin (1 mg/ml sterile concentrate) was a generous gift from King Khalid University Hospital drug store, King Saud University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Rutin was purchased from Sigma Chemicals (Sigma-Aldrich Louis, MO, USA). Primers were designed using primer express 3 (Applied Biosystem, Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) and high capacity reverse transcriptase and Syber Green master mix kits were purchased from Applied Biosystems (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA).

Methods

Experimental Design was followed Kamel et al., protocol [42]. In brief, 40 rats were randomly divided into four groups (ten rats each) and subjected to treatment as follows: Group-1 (control group) was IP injected with 2.5 ml/kg saline; Group-2 (rutin group) was orally (using Gavage) administrated 30 mg/kg rutin (dissolved in water) for 14 days; Group-3 (cisplatin group) was IP injected with 5 mg/kg cisplatin single dose [43, 44] and Group-4 orally administrated 30 mg/kg rutin dissolved in water for 14 days with a single dose of 5 mg/kg cisplatin IP on the day ten (rutin and cisplatin group).

At least 24 h after the last treatment protocol, all animals were weighted and were recorded after that the animals were anesthetic by exposed to ether according to our laboratory protocol and conducted in compliance with Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee policy, September 2013 (IACUC POLICY # 13) and killed by decapitation, during this procedure, the rats were unconscious [45]. The brain was immediately removed, washed with an ice-cold saline solution and then snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and finally stored until used for the molecular studies.

Bioassays

Serum Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS)

Lipid peroxidation, in brain tissues, was determined using TBARS assay kit (Cayman Chemical, MI) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, MDA standard curve was prepared by diluting 250 μL MDA standard with 750 μL water and then serial dilution that started from 0 μm to 50 μm was prepared. A mixture of 100 μL of the serum sample, 100 μL of homogenate brain tissues in cold 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), standard and 100 μL of SDS was first prepared. Four milliliters of color reagent was added to each mixture and boiled for an hour. After that, the reaction was stopped on ice for 10 min and centrifuged for 10 min at 1600×g; then 150 μL of the supernatant was loaded in a 96-well plate and absorbance was read at 540 nm. TBARS concentration was calculated from MDA standard curve.

Estimation of glutathione (GSH) levels in brain tissues

Glutathione concentration was determined by the previously described method by Sedlak and Lindsay [46]. Briefly, 0.2 mg brain tissues were homogenized in ice-cold 0.02 M EDTA then 0.5 ml of tissue homogenate was mixed with 0.2 M Tris buffer, pH 8.2 and 0.1 ml of 0.01 M Ellman’s reagent, [5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitr-benzoic acid)] (DTNB). Each sample tube was centrifuged at 704×g at room temperature for 15 min. The supernatant was measured using spectrophotometer (LKB-Pharmacia, Mark II, Ireland) at 412 nm.

Determination of the genes expression levels in brain tissues:

Total RNAs were extracted from frontal cortex brain tissue by Trizol method according to the manufacturer’s protocol as previously described [47]. The RNA concentrations and purity were measured by NanoDrop (NanoDrop 8000, Thermo Scientific, USA). Total RNA was electrophorized on ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel. The isolated RNA has an A 260/280 ratio of 1.9–2.1.

cDNA synthesis and real-time PCR methods

First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA by reverse transcription using high capacity reverse transcriptase kit (life technology, Applied Biosystem, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time PCR was done using 2-ΔΔCt method according to our previous study [48]. GAPDH gene was used as endogenous control. All primers used in this study were synthesized in Jena Bioscience Germany and were listed in Table 1. Following amplification, melting curve analysis was performed to verify the correct product according to its specific melting temperature (Tm).

Table 1 The primers sequences that used in this study

Statistical analysis

Differences between obtained values (mean ± SEM, n = 10) were carried out by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test. A P value of 0.05 or less was taken as a criterion for a statistically significant difference using graph pad 5.0 prism software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).

Results

Rutin restores rat body weight, TBAR, and GSH levels

The effect of cisplatin, rutin and their combination on the rat body weight during the experiment was shown in Fig. 1a. The injection of cisplatin did not kill any rat during the whole experiment. However, following the injection, the animals significantly lost body weight compared to a steady weight gain of the controls.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The Effect of Cisplatin, rutin, and their combination on the body weight (a), TBARs levels (b) and glutathione (c). Data were presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10). *, # and $ indicate significant change from control, rutin and CP + rutin, respectively, at P < 0.05 using ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer as a post ANOVA test

Cisplatin induces oxidative stress, which in turn cause lipid peroxidation. This effect can be studied by determining the level of the lipid degradation product such as TBAR. Therefore, we studied if rutin can protect animal brain tissues against lipid peroxidation. As expected cisplatin increased TBAR levels significantly in brain tissues compared to control group by 375% (P < 0.001) indicating an increase in the free radicals (Fig. 1b). However, combining cisplatin with rutin reversed the increase in TBAR level to normal values as in the control group (Fig. 1b). Thus, these results showed that rutin could prevent the cisplatin-induced lipid peroxidation and neuroprotective the cell.

Glutathione (GSH) is natural antioxidant that presents almost in all domains of life and its availability in normal level protects cells from ROS. Our study showed clearly that cisplatin decreased the GSH levels by 50% in comparison with the control group. Interestingly, rutin administration in combination with cisplatin was able to increase GSH level to its normal level (Fig. 1c). These results showed that cellular oxidative damage caused by cisplatin through affecting the level of GSH could be prevented by co-administration of rutin.

Rutin increases GPx expression to normal range in brain tissues

Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) is one of the most crucial antioxidant enzymes. In this study we interested in examining the effect of cisplatin on GPx expression level in brain tissues of rats model. Cisplatin treatment reduced the GPX expression level by 4.5-fold compared to control group (p < 0.05) (Fig. 2). The supplementation of rutin with cisplatin overexpressed GPX level by 6.3-fold compared to the cisplatin group (p < 0.02) (Fig. 2). These data illustrate the importance of rutin as protective agent of cisplatin-induced oxidative damage.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The Effect of Cisplatin, rutin, and their combination on the expression levels of Glutathione peroxidase in rat brain. Data were presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10). *, # and $ indicate significant change from control, rutin and CP + rutin, respectively, at P < 0.05 using ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer as a post ANOVA test

Rutin promotes the normal expression of antioxidant genes in brain tissues

One of the enzyme families that has a role in the prevention of oxidative stress is PONs. In order to examine the effect of cisplatin on these genes, we analyzed their expression profile in vivo after exposure to cisplatin. Administration of cisplatin significantly decreases the PON-1 and PON-3 expression level by 4-fold (p < 0.05) and by 4.5-fold (p < 0.05), respectively, compared to control group (Fig. 3a and c). Interestingly, administration of rutin in combination with cisplatin completely restored PON-1 and PON-3 expression to their normal levels as in the control group (Fig. 3a and c). These reversal changes result in significant increase in the PON-1 and PON-3 expression level by 5.2-fold (p < 0.01) and 6-fold (p < 0.002), respectively, compared to cisplatin group and by 1.3-fold and 1.4-fold compared to control group (p < 0.5), respectively (Fig. 3a and c). Taken together, these results suggest that rutin neuroprotects the cells from cisplatin-induced stress by promoting the expression of PON-1 and PON-3 antioxidant genes.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The Effect of Cisplatin, rutin, and their combination on the expression levels of PON-1 (a), PON-2 (b) and PON-3 (c) in rat brain tissues. Data were presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10). *, # and $ indicate significant change from control, rutin and CP + rutin, respectively, at P < 0.05 using ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer as a post ANOVA test

As respond to increase in ROS, PON-2 expression increases to antagonize oxidative stress. Therefore, in this study, we examine the effect of cisplatin on PON-2 expression level. As shown in (Fig. 3b) the administration of cisplatin resulted in significant increase in the expression level of PON-2 by 12-fold (p < 0.001) compared to control. Strikingly, combining rutin with cisplatin resulted in a complete reversal of PON-2 to their normal values as in the control group. These reversal changes result in significant decrease in the PON-2 expression level by 5-fold (p < 0.5) compared to cisplatin group (Fig. 3b). These results demonstrate that rutin by itself can counteract the production of ROS by cisplatin, therefore, no need to elevate PON-2.

Rutin reverses the effect of Cisplatin on PPAR-δ expression in brain tissues

Activation of PPAR-δ expression reduces the intracellular ROS accumulation. We investigate the effect of cisplatin on the antioxidant mechanism and hence induce oxidative stress. Exposing the rats to cisplatin resulted in significant decrease in PPAR-δ expression level by 1.66-fold (p < 0.05) compared to the control group (Fig. 4). However, complementing cisplatin with rutin increases PPAR-δ expression level by 1 .8-fold (p < 0.02) and 3-fold (p < 0.01) compared to control and CP groups, respectively. These data showed that rutin could restore the antioxidant PPAR-δ expression resulting in protection of the cells from cisplatin-induced oxidative damage.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The Effect of Cisplatin, rutin, and their combination on the expression levels of PPAR-δ in rat brain. Data were presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10). *, # and $ indicate significant change from control, rutin and CP+ rutin, respectively, at P < 0.05 using ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer as a post ANOVA test

Discussion

Cisplatin is a wildly used anticancer drug but its toxicities have limited its uses in cancer treatment at effective doses. Cisplatin causes lipid membrane peroxidation by increasing free oxygen radicals and reducing antioxidant production, finally resulting in extensive tissue damage [49]. Several mechanisms are proposed for the cisplatin-neurotoxicity in which oxidative damage is one of the important mechanism in cisplatin and other chemotherapeutic agents’ toxicity. The oxidative stress alters the cell structure and function, and reduces the antioxidant mechanisms resulting in DNA damage in biological systems [50]. Combining the drug with another protective agent is one of the methods used to decrease the severity of the drug-related toxicity. Several studies conclude that the antioxidant agent such as rutin, L-acetayle carnitine, Parsley oil, ceftriaxone, honey bee and royal jelly have antioxidant activity against chemotherapy [29,30,31, 51, 52]. The current study investigated the protective effect of rutin on the brain of the rat against cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity via studying the gene expression level of some genes related to the antioxidant pathway.

The neurotoxic effect was determined by measuring the TBAR, GSH and antioxidant genes levels in the brain tissue of the rat. In this study, administration of cisplatin significantly increase the TBAR and decline the GSH levels. Similarly, Turan and coworker found that cisplatin-induced oxidative stress in the brain tissue via significantly increased the TBAR and reduced the GSH levels [53]. The elevated TBARS levels in tissues indicate the increase in the free oxygen radical that results in cells destruction [54]. Glutathione provides the first line of defense against oxidative damage and toxic compounds and has role in several metabolic processes [55]. The decrease in the glutathione levels leads to reduction in the NADPH or GSH utilization in exclusion of peroxides [56].

Previous studies demonstrated that antioxidant agents could prevent cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity [43, 44]. Rutin is a potent bioflavonoid with powerful antioxidant, anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory properties [34]. In the current study, rutin co-administration with cisplatin reversed the changes in TBAR and GSH to their normal levels as in control group. Therefore, rutin may prevent lipid peroxidation on the cell membrane by scavenging the free oxygen radicals.

The oxidative stress can cause cell damage when losing the imbalance between ROS production and antioxidant defense [57]. In the brain, PONs are important in nerves myelination due to their protective function against lipid oxidation. PON-1 and PON3 are expressed in liver, and their protein products are associated with high-density lipoproteins in plasma. PON-1 and PON3 can protect LDL from oxidation by scavenging free radicals [46]. The antioxidant activity of PON1 is via its association with its –SH group that can affect its activity [58]. The inhibition of PON-1 expression and activity plays a role in neurotoxicity and oxidative stress [59]. In the brain, PON1 polymorphisms rs662 and rs854560 is involved in Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology [60]. The decrease in PON1 and PON3 expression levels is associated with toxicity induced by oxidative stress. Similarly, in our previous study, the decrease in PON1 and PON3 expression levels is associated with hepatotoxicity induced by carbon tetrachloride [61]. In the present study, rutin co-administration with cisplatin reverses the alteration in PON1 and PON3 expression levels and increases its antioxidant activity. Rutin reduces neurotoxicity via antioxidant activity. Previous study found that the neuroprotective effect of rutin in the rat brain ischemia was through its ability to reduce TBARS, H2O2 and GSH in the hippocampus and frontal cortex in the middle cerebral artery occlusion. In addition to its ability to reduce the expression of p53 and increasing of antioxidant enzymatic activities [40].

PON2 is a member of paraoxonase family [62] and is a ubiquitously expressed intracellular enzyme [63, 64]. PON2 mRNA and protein are detected in the brain [64, 65]. PON2 exerts an antioxidant effect and play a major role in neuroprotection [66, 67]. PON2 is localized primarily in the mitochondria [20, 68] and this support its role in protecting cells from oxidative damage. In the current study, cisplatin significantly increased the PON2 expression levels. Rutin administration decreases the expression levels of PON2 as in control group. Similarly, PON2 high expression is accompanying with resistance to oxidative stress-induced toxicity and may be one of its neuroprotective mechanisms [69]. The previous study showed that rutin has a neuroprotective effect in the brain ischemia in rats [40]. It also ameliorated morphological damage and attenuated ischemic neural apoptosis by reducing the p53 expression and increasing of antioxidant enzymatic activities [40].

The PON2 over-expression by cisplatin might be associated with increased the cells’ ability to scavenge ROS and to antagonize oxidant-induced toxicity. Other study found that the macrophage PON2 expression and activity were increased under oxidative stress and suggested that this increase might be a compensatory mechanism against oxidative stress [18].

Among the PPAR isoforms, PPARδ expression is abundant in the neural cell types and might play a role in the brain physiological functions [70] but its exact roles needs more clarification. The activation of PPARδ induced by a neurotransmitter involved in neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease [71] and reduced the intracellular ROS accumulation. In the present study, cisplatin-induced reduction in the PPARδ expression level and this alteration was reversed by administering rutin. Similarly, previous study showed that PPARδ activation could induce antioxidant systems [72] as well as provide neuroprotection [73, 74].

Conclusion

In conclusion, rutin showed neuroprotective effect on the brain of rat cisplatin- neurotoxic model with a possible mechanism via the antioxidant pathway.

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

One-way analysis of variance

cDNA:

Complementary deoxynucleic acid

CP:

Cisplatin

DNA:

Deoxynucleic acid

GPX:

Glutathione peroxidase (GPx)

GSH:

Glutathione

HDL:

High density lipoproteins

IP:

Intra-peritoneal

LDL:

Low density lipoproteins

NADPH:

Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate-oxidase

PON-1:

Paraoxonase-1

PON-2:

Paraoxonase-2

PON-3:

Paraoxonase-3

PPAR-δ:

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta

RNA:

Ribonucleic acid

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

TBARS:

Thiobarbituric acid reactive substance

References

  1. Zhou W, Kavelaars A, Heijnen CJ. Metformin prevents Cisplatin-induced cognitive impairment and brain damage in mice. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0151890.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenberg B, VanCamp L, Trosko JE, Mansour VH. Platinum compounds: a new class of potent antitumour agents. Nature. 1969;222(5191):385–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Von Hoff DD, Rozencweig M. Cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum(II): a metal complex with significant anticancer activity. Adv Pharmacol Chemother. 1979;16:273–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Siddik ZH. Cisplatin: mode of cytotoxic action and molecular basis of resistance. Oncogene. 2003;22(47):7265–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Melnikov SVSD, Steitz TA, Polikanov YS. Insights into RNA binding by the anticancer drug cisplatin from the crystal structure of cisplatin-modified ribosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(10):4978–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gorman DJ, Kefford R, Stuart-Harris R. Focal encephalopathy after cisplatin therapy. Med J Aust. 1989;150(7):399–401.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Akman T, Akman L, Erbas O, Terek MC, Taskiran D, Ozsaran A. The preventive effect of oxytocin to Cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity: an experimental rat model. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:167235.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Grisold W, Cavaletti G, Windebank AJ. Peripheral neuropathies from chemotherapeutics and targeted agents: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Neuro-Oncology. 2012;14(Suppl 4):iv45–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohammad Ahmadi Soleimani S, Ekhtiari H, Cadet JL. Drug-induced neurotoxicity in addiction medicine: from prevention to harm reduction. Prog Brain Res. 2016;223:19–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang ZG, Fuller SA, Ghanbari HA. PAN-811 blocks chemotherapy drug-induced in vitro neurotoxicity, while not affecting suppression of cancer cell growth. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016:9392404.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kasznicki J, Sliwinska A, Drzewoski J: Metformin in cancer prevention and therapy. Ann Transl Med. 2014;2(6):57.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Brouwers EE, Huitema AD, Boogerd W, Beijnen JH, Schellens JH. Persistent neuropathy after treatment with cisplatin and oxaliplatin. Acta Oncol. 2009;48(6):832–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vichaya EG, Chiu GS, Krukowski K, Lacourt TE, Kavelaars A, Dantzer R, Heijnen CJ, Walker AK. Mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced behavioral toxicities. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Windebank AJ, Smith AG, Russell JW. The effect of nerve growth factor, ciliary neurotrophic factor, and ACTH analogs on cisplatin neurotoxicity in vitro. Neurology. 1994;44(3 Pt 1):488–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van der Hoop RG, Vecht CJ, van der Burg ME, Elderson A, Boogerd W, Heimans JJ, Vries EP, van Houwelingen JC, Jennekens FG, Gispen WH, et al. Prevention of cisplatin neurotoxicity with an ACTH(4-9) analogue in patients with ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(2):89–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cavaletti G, Tredici G, Marmiroli P, Petruccioli MG, Barajon I, Fabbrica D. Morphometric study of the sensory neuron and peripheral nerve changes induced by chronic cisplatin (DDP) administration in rats. Acta Neuropathol. 1992;84(4):364–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sokolowska M, Kowalski ML, Pawliczak R. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors-gamma (PPAR-gamma) and their role in immunoregulation and inflammation control. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2005;59:472–84.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aviram M, Rosenblat M. Paraoxonases 1, 2, and 3, oxidative stress, and macrophage foam cell formation during atherosclerosis development. Free Radic Biol Med. 2004;37(9):1304–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Draganov DI, Teiber JF, Speelman A, Osawa Y, Sunahara R, La Du BN. Human paraoxonases (PON1, PON2, and PON3) are lactonases with overlapping and distinct substrate specificities. J Lipid Res. 2005;46(6):1239–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marsillach J, Mackness B, Mackness M, Riu F, Beltran R, Joven J, Camps J. Immunohistochemical analysis of paraoxonases-1, 2, and 3 expression in normal mouse tissues. Free Radic Biol Med. 2008;45(2):146–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mochizuki H, Scherer SW, Xi T, Nickle DC, Majer M, Huizenga JJ, Tsui LC, Prochazka M. Human PON2 gene at 7q21.3: cloning, multiple mRNA forms, and missense polymorphisms in the coding sequence. Gene. 1998;213(1-2):149–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reddy ST, Wadleigh DJ, Grijalva V, Ng C, Hama S, Gangopadhyay A, Shih DM, Lusis AJ, Navab M, Fogelman AM. Human paraoxonase-3 is an HDL-associated enzyme with biological activity similar to paraoxonase-1 protein but is not regulated by oxidized lipids. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001;21(4):542–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Belteki G, Kempster SL, Forhead AJ, Giussani DA, Fowden AL, Curley A, Charnock-Jones DS, Smith GC. Paraoxonase-3, a putative circulating antioxidant, is systemically up-regulated in late gestation in the fetal rat, sheep, and human. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(8):3798–805.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Asensio-Lopez MC, Soler F, Pascual-Figal D, Fernandez-Belda F, Lax A. Doxorubicin-induced oxidative stress: the protective effect of nicorandil on HL-1 cardiomyocytes. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0172803.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Gao L, Wu WF, Dong L, Ren GL, Li HD, Yang Q, Li XF, Xu T, Li Z, Wu BM, et al. Protocatechuic Aldehyde attenuates Cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury by suppressing Nox-mediated oxidative stress and renal inflammation. Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:479.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. El-Beshbishy HABS, Aly HA, Fakher HA. Abrogation of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in mice by alpha lipoic acid through ameliorating oxidative stress and enhancing gene expression of antioxidant enzymes. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011;668(1-2):278–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Trujillo J, Molina-Jijon E, Medina-Campos ON, Rodriguez-Munoz R, Reyes JL, Loredo ML, Barrera-Oviedo D, Pinzon E, Rodriguez-Rangel DS, Pedraza-Chaverri J. Curcumin prevents cisplatin-induced decrease in the tight and adherens junctions: relation to oxidative stress. Food Funct. 2016;7(1):279–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Marnett LJ. Oxyradicals and DNA damage. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21(3):361–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Abdellatief SA, Galal AA, Farouk SM, Abdel-Daim MM. Ameliorative effect of parsley oil on cisplatin-induced hepato-cardiotoxicity: a biochemical, histopathological, and immunohistochemical study. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;86:482–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Abdel-Daim MM, El-Sayed YS, Eldaim MA, Ibrahim A. Nephroprotective efficacy of ceftriaxone against cisplatin-induced subchronic renal fibrosis in rats. Naunyn Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol. 2017;390(3):301–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ibrahim A, Eldaim MA, Abdel-Daim MM. Nephroprotective effect of bee honey and royal jelly against subchronic cisplatin toxicity in rats. Cytotechnology. 2016;68(4):1039–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Uivarosi V, Barbuceanu SF, Aldea V, Arama CC, Badea M, Olar R, Marinescu D. Synthesis, spectral and thermal studies of new rutin vanadyl complexes. Molecules. 2010;15(3):1578–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Isai M, Sakthivel M, Ramesh E, Thomas PA, Geraldine P. Prevention of selenite-induced cataractogenesis by rutin in Wistar rats. Mol Vis. 2009;15:2570–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Sharma S, Ali A, Ali J, Sahni JK, Baboota S. Rutin : therapeutic potential and recent advances in drug delivery. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2013;22(8):1063–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Aksu EHKF, Özkaraca M, Ömür AD, Küçükler S, Çomaklı S. Rutin ameliorates cisplatin-induced reproductive damage via suppression of oxidative stress and apoptosis in adult male rats. Andrologia. 2017;49(1):12593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kamel KMAE-RO, Metwally SA, Abd El-Latif HA, El-sayed ME. Hesperidin and rutin, antioxidant citrus flavonoids, attenuate cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2014;28(7):312–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Arjumand WSA, Sultana S. Rutin attenuates cisplatin induced renal inflammation and apoptosis by reducing NFκB, TNF-α and caspase-3 expression in wistar rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2011;49(9):2013–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ola MSAM, Ahmad R, Abuohashish HM, Al-Rejaie SS, Alhomida AS. Neuroprotective effects of Rutin in Streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat retina. J Mol Neurosci. 2015;56(2):440–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ramalingayya GVCS, Nayak PG, Kishore A, Shenoy R, Rao CM, Krishnadas N. Rutin protects against neuronal damage in vitro and ameliorates doxorubicin-induced memory deficits in vivo in Wistar rats. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017;11:1011–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Khan MM, Ahmad A, Ishrat T, Khuwaja G, Srivastawa P, Khan MB, Raza SS, Javed H, Vaibhav K, Khan A, et al. Rutin protects the neural damage induced by transient focal ischemia in rats. Brain Res. 2009;1292:123–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hafez MMHS, El-Khadragy MF, Hassan ZK, Al Rejaie SS, Sayed-Ahmed MM, Al-Harbi NO, Al-Hosaini KA, Al-Harbi MM, Alhoshani AR, Al-Shabanah OA, Alsharari SD. Effect of ginseng extract on the TGF-β1 signaling pathway in CCl4-induced liver fibrosis in rats. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017;13(17):1507–10.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kamel KM, Abd El-Raouf OM, Metwally SA, Abd El-Latif HA, El-sayed ME. Hesperidin and rutin, antioxidant citrus flavonoids, attenuate cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2014;28(7):312–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rezvanfar MA, Shahverdi AR, Ahmadi A, Baeeri M, Mohammadirad A, Abdollahi M. Protection of cisplatin-induced spermatotoxicity, DNA damage and chromatin abnormality by selenium nano-particles. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2013;266(3):356–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Tan DX, Manchester LC, Terron MP, Flores LJ, Reiter RJ. One molecule, many derivatives: a never-ending interaction of melatonin with reactive oxygen and nitrogen species? J Pineal Res. 2007;42(1):28–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hafez MM, Al-Harbi NO, Al-Hoshani AR, Al-Hosaini KA, Al Shrari SD, Al Rejaie SS, Sayed-Ahmed MM, Al-Shabanah OA. Hepato-protective effect of rutin via IL-6/STAT3 pathway in CCl4-induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Biol Res. 2015;48:30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Aviram M, Rosenblat M, Billecke S, Erogul J, Sorenson R, Bisgaier CL, Newton RS, La Du B. Human serum paraoxonase (PON 1) is inactivated by oxidized low density lipoprotein and preserved by antioxidants. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;26(7-8):892–904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Chomczynski P. A reagent for the single-step simultaneous isolation of RNA, DNA and proteins from cell and tissue samples. BioTechniques. 1993;15(3):532–4. 536-537

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sayed-Ahmed MM, Al-Shabanah OA, Hafez MM, Aleisa AM, Al-Rejaie SS. Inhibition of gene expression of heart fatty acid binding protein and organic cation/carnitine transporter in doxorubicin cardiomyopathic rat model. Eur J Pharmacol. 2010;640(1-3):143–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sugihara K, Gemba M. Modification of cisplatin toxicity by antioxidants. Jpn J Pharmacol. 1986;40(2):353–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Aruoma OI, Grootveld M, Bahorun T. Free radicals in biology and medicine: from inflammation to biotechnology. Biofactors. 2006;27(1-4):1–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Alhoshani AR, Hafez MM, Husain S, Al-Sheikh AM, Alotaibi MR, Al Rejaie SS, Alshammari MA, Almutairi MM, Al-Shabanah OA. Protective effect of rutin supplementation against cisplatin-induced Nephrotoxicity in rats. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18(1):194.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Pisano C, Pratesi G, Laccabue D, Zunino F, Lo Giudice P, Bellucci A, Pacifici L, Camerini B, Vesci L, Castorina M, et al. Paclitaxel and Cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity: a protective role of acetyl-L-carnitine. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9(15):5756–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Turan MI, Cayir A, Cetin N, Suleyman H, Siltelioglu Turan I, Tan H. An investigation of the effect of thiamine pyrophosphate on cisplatin-induced oxidative stress and DNA damage in rat brain tissue compared with thiamine: thiamine and thiamine pyrophosphate effects on cisplatin neurotoxicity. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2014;33(1):14–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Slater TF, Cheeseman KH, Davies MJ, Proudfoot K, Xin W. Free radical mechanisms in relation to tissue injury. Proc Nutr Soc. 1987;46(1):1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Meister A. Glutathione deficiency produced by inhibition of its synthesis, and its reversal; applications in research and therapy. Pharmacol Ther. 1991;51(2):155–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Yadav P, Sarkar S, Bhatnagar D. Action of capparis decidua against alloxan-induced oxidative stress and diabetes in rat tissues. Pharmacol Res. 1997;36(3):221–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Blokhina O, Virolainen E, Fagerstedt KV. Antioxidants, oxidative damage and oxygen deprivation stress: a review. Ann Bot. 2003;91(Spec):179–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Brattin WJ, Glende EA Jr, Recknagel RO. Pathological mechanisms in carbon tetrachloride hepatotoxicity. J Free Radicals Biol Med. 1985;1(1):27–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Tang XQ, Ren YK, Chen RQ, Zhuang YY, Fang HR, Xu JH, Wang CY, Hu B. Formaldehyde induces neurotoxicity to PC12 cells involving inhibition of paraoxonase-1 expression and activity. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2011;38(4):208–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Xie A, Gao J, Xu L, Meng D. Shared mechanisms of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:648740.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Hafez MM, Al-Shabanah OA, Al-Harbi NO, Al-Harbi MM, Al-Rejaie SS, Alsurayea SM, Sayed-Ahmed MM. Association between paraoxonases gene expression and oxidative stress in hepatotoxicity induced by CCl4. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2014;2014:893212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Meilin E, Aviram M, Hayek T. Paraoxonase 2 (PON2) decreases high glucose-induced macrophage triglycerides (TG) accumulation, via inhibition of NADPH-oxidase and DGAT1 activity: studies in PON2-deficient mice. Atherosclerosis. 2010;208(2):390–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Costa LG, de Laat R, Dao K, Pellacani C, Cole TB, Furlong CE. Paraoxonase-2 (PON2) in brain and its potential role in neuroprotection. Neurotoxicology. 2014;43:3–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Stoltz DA, Ozer EA, Recker TJ, Estin M, Yang X, Shih DM, Lusis AJ, Zabner J. A common mutation in paraoxonase-2 results in impaired lactonase activity. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(51):35564–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Surmeier DJ, Guzman JN, Sanchez-Padilla J, Goldberg JA. The origins of oxidant stress in Parkinson's disease and therapeutic strategies. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;14(7):1289–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Tamas A, Lubics A, Szalontay L, Lengvari I, Reglodi D. Age and gender differences in behavioral and morphological outcome after 6-hydroxydopamine-induced lesion of the substantia nigra in rats. Behav Brain Res. 2005;158(2):221–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Vahter M, Gochfeld M, Casati B, Thiruchelvam M, Falk-Filippson A, Kavlock R, Marafante E, Cory-Slechta D. Implications of gender differences for human health risk assessment and toxicology. Environ Res. 2007;104(1):70–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Giordano G, Cole TB, Furlong CE, Costa LG. Paraoxonase 2 (PON2) in the mouse central nervous system: a neuroprotective role? Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011;256(3):369–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Costa LG, Tait L, de Laat R, Dao K, Giordano G, Pellacani C, Cole TB, Furlong CE. Modulation of paraoxonase 2 (PON2) in mouse brain by the polyphenol quercetin: a mechanism of neuroprotection? Neurochem Res. 2013;38(9):1809–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Revelo MP, Federspiel C, Helderman H, Fogo AB. Chronic allograft nephropathy: expression and localization of PAI-1 and PPAR-gamma. Nephrol Dialysis Transplant. 2005;20(12):2812–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Mattson MP, Guthrie PB, Kater SB. Intrinsic factors in the selective vulnerability of hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1989;317:333–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Peters JM, Lee SS, Li W, Ward JM, Gavrilova O, Everett C, Reitman ML, Hudson LD, Gonzalez FJ. Growth, adipose, brain, and skin alterations resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta(delta). Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(14):5119–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Smith SA, Monteith GR, Robinson JA, Venkata NG, May FJ, Roberts-Thomson SJ. Effect of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta activator GW0742 in rat cultured cerebellar granule neurons. J Neurosci Res. 2004;77(2):240–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Sayan-Ozacmak H, Ozacmak VH, Barut F, Jakubowska-Dogru E. Neuroprotective efficacy of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma ligand in chronic cerebral hypoperfusion. Curr Neurovasc Res. 2011;8(3):190–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at KSU for funding this work (research group project no. RGP-142).

Funding

This work was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at KSU (research group project no. RGP-142).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MMA participated in the study design and treatment, participated in practical work, collated, analyzed and interpreted the data, and also drafted the manuscript. WAA participated in the study design and treatment, participated in practical work, collated, analyzed and interpreted the data, and also drafted the manuscript. MAA participated in the study design and treatment, participated in practical work, collated, analyzed and interpreted the data, and also drafted the manuscript. MRA shared in the study design and treatment, participated in practical work, collated, analyzed and interpreted the data, and also drafted the manuscript. ARA participated in the study design and treatment, participated in practical work, collated, analyzed and interpreted the data, and also drafted the manuscript. SSA participated in the study design and treatment, participated in practical work, collated, analyzed and interpreted the data, and also drafted the manuscript. MMH participated in the study design and treatment, participated in practical work, collated, analyzed and interpreted the data, and also drafted the manuscript. OAA participated in the study design and treatment, participated in practical work, collated, analyzed and interpreted the data, and also drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Othman A. Al-Shabanah.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing of interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Almutairi, M.M., Alanazi, W.A., Alshammari, M.A. et al. Neuro-protective effect of rutin against Cisplatin-induced neurotoxic rat model. BMC Complement Altern Med 17, 472 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-1976-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-1976-9

Keywords