Skip to main content
Download PDF

Cytotoxic and apoptotic evaluations of marine bacteria isolated from brine-seawater interface of the Red Sea

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine volume 13, Article number: 29 (2013) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

High salinity and temperature combined with presence of heavy metals and low oxygen renders deep-sea anoxic brines of the Red Sea as one of the most extreme environments on Earth. The ability to adapt and survive in these extreme environments makes inhabiting bacteria interesting candidates for the search of novel bioactive molecules.

Methods

Total 20 i.e. lipophilic (chloroform) and hydrophilic (70% ethanol) extracts of marine bacteria isolated from brine-seawater interface of the Red Sea were tested for cytotoxic and apoptotic activity against three human cancer cell lines, i.e. HeLa (cervical carcinoma), MCF-7 (Breast Adenocarcinoma) and DU145 (Prostate carcinoma).

Results

Among these, twelve extracts were found to be very active after 24 hours of treatment, which were further evaluated for their cytotoxic and apoptotic effects at 48 hr. The extracts from the isolates P1-37B and P3-37A (Halomonas) and P1-17B (Sulfitobacter) have been found to be the most potent against tested cancer cell lines.

Conclusion

Overall, bacterial isolates from the Red Sea displayed promising results and can be explored further to find novel drug-like molecules. The cell line specific activity of the extracts may be attributed to the presence of different polarity compounds or the cancer type i.e. biological differences in cell lines and different mechanisms of action of programmed cell death prevalent in different cancer cell lines.

Peer Review reports

Background

The marine environment is a rich source of unique bioactive molecules with unlimited chemical and functional diversity. Approximately 30,000 natural products have been isolated from marine organisms (http://dmnp.chemnetbase.com/intro/index.jsp) and many of the drug candidates are currently in clinical trials [1, 2]. In the recent reports, both, deep sea water bodies and seafloors have been shown to be some of the most biodiverse and species-rich habitats on the planet [3, 4]. The continuous search for new chemically diverse molecules and the development of new methods for culturing deep-sea microorganisms have placed the deep sea environment as a new frontier in the drug discovery process. The general opinion is that the survival of deep sea organisms in the extreme conditions of pressure, absence of light, low levels of oxygen, high temperature and salt concentration may have affect their primary and secondary metabolite profiles [5, 6] which, in turn, can be suitable candidates for discovery of structurally unique molecules.

Siderophore Bisucaberin [7] was the first cytotoxic compound isolated from deep-sea marine bacteria Alteromonas haloplanktis, collected at 3000 m depth off the coast of Aomori Prefecture, Japan. Lately, Homann et al. reported the isolation of peptidic siderophores Loihichelins A-F [8] from the cultures of heterotrophic bacterium Halomonas LOB-5 collected from the southern rift zone of Loihi Seamount east of Hawaii. Novel cytotoxic phenazine derivatives [9] with unique ring system have been described from pacific sediment Bacillus sp. (5059 m depth). Several other compounds with significant cytotoxic activity which were isolated from deep-sea Bacillus and Streptomyces sp. and actinomycete have been described by Danielle Skropeta in a recent review [10]. In our effort to exploit the biodiversity of these environments, several strains of marine bacteria were isolated from Kebrit Deep, Nereus Deep, Discovery Deep and Erba Deep of the Red Sea [11] and evaluated for their cytotoxic and apoptotic potential.

The Red Sea harbors approximately 25 deep-sea anoxic brine pools, which were formed by a process of re-dissolution of evaporitic deposits [12–14]. The deep-sea anoxic brines of the Red Sea are considered to be one of the most extreme environments on Earth, which are characterized by drastic changes in physicochemical conditions when compared to overlying seawater. This includes the increases in salinity (from 4% up to 26% salinity), temperature (up to 70°C), concentrations of heavy metals, and decrease in oxygen [15, 16].

The present study describes the assessment of anticancer activity of marine microorganisms from the brine-seawater interface of the Red Sea. The cytotoxic activities of lipophilic, i.e. chloroform and hydrophilic, i.e. 70% ethanol extracts of marine bacteria isolated from deep sea brine pools of Red Sea, against HeLa (cervical carcinoma), MCF-7 (breast adenocarcinoma) and DU145 (prostate carcinoma) cell lines, were measured at 24 hr time point. Some of the highly active extracts were further assessed for cytotoxicity and apoptotic activity at 48 hr.

Methods

Field sampling

Water samples from the brine-seawater interface were collected using a rosette sampler equipped with 10 l Niskin bottles and a conductivity-temperature-depths (CTD) unit for monitoring salinity, temperature, transmission, and pressure. At each sampling site, 180 l of samples were collected and pre-filtered through a 5.0 μm SMWP membrane (diameter 290 mm; Millipore, Ireland) to remove suspended particles, then filter-concentrated with Tangential Flow Filtration (TFF) system through Durapore 0.1 μm PVDF filter (Pellicon 2 Cassette Filter, Screen type C, size 0.5 m2, Millipore Corporation, MA, USA). After filtration, one liter of each concentrated sample was stored in the dark at 4°C and was used as inoculum.

Source of bacterial isolates

Twelve strains of bacteria investigated in this study were isolated from brine-seawater interface of deep sea brines in the Red Sea. Brine-seawater samples for bacterial isolation were collected from four different deep brines named Discovery Deep (2050 m), Kebrit Deep (1549 m), Nereus Deep (2300 m), and Erba Deep (2300 m). Each of the deep sea brine has its unique physicochemical composition [11]. In the Discovery deep, brine–seawater boundaries are characterized by strong temperature and salinity gradients [14].

All of the bacterial strains isolated in this study were obtained by the streak plate method described elsewhere [17]. All of the strains grew in 10% NaCl with the exception of one strain isolated from Discovery Deep. This strain was successfully isolated using 20% NaCl.

PCR amplification

PCR amplifications of the extracted DNA of the cultures were performed in a 25 μl reaction having 12.5 μl Promega PCR Master Mix (Promega, USA), 0.5 μl (final concentration 0.5 μM) of primer 27bF (5’-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3’) and 1492uR (5’-TACCTTGTTACGACTT-3’). PCR reaction were carried out in Mastercycler (Eppendorf, Germany) under the following conditions: a pre-denaturation temperature of 95°C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 95°C for 60s, 55°C for 60s, 72°C for 30s; followed by final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The yield and quality of the PCR products were examined on 1% (wt/vol) agarose gel (SeaKem GTG, Lonza, USA) stained with SYBR Safe (Invitrogen, USA), then purified with Illustra Exostar 1-step (GE, Healthcare, UK) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The 16S rRNA genes were sequenced with an ABI 3730xl capillary DNA sequencer (PE Applied Biosystems), at Core Lab. KAUST, Saudi Arabia.

Bacterial biomass

Strains of halophilic bacteria were isolated into pure culture by streaking the samples onto three different solid media types, marine agar 2216 (Difco), plate count agar (Teknova), and R2A agar (Oxoid). These media were supplemented with either 10% or 20% NaCl to adjust salinity. All plates were incubated at 30°C and inspected daily for two weeks. Colonies with different morphologies were picked and pure cultures of these colonies were obtained after three transfers. Taxonomic identifications were based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing. DNA extraction of the pure cultures, 16S rRNA gene amplification, and sequencing were performed according to [18]. A BLASTN search was used to identify strains to their closest relatives in GenBank. To prepare extracts, bacteria were grown in 1 L of Marine Broth (Difco) supplemented with NaCl. Cultures were incubated at 30°C in a shaking incubator and harvested after two weeks by centrifugation. Cell pellets were frozen at − 80°C until used for extract preparation.

Extract preparation

Lipophilic, i.e. chloroform and hydrophilic, i.e. 70% ethanol, extracts of 12 strains of marine bacteria were prepared at a concentration of 100 mg mL-1 (speedvac dried material/mL of solvent). Solutions were sonicated with ultra-sound probe (Biologics Inc., Model 150 V/T) for 3 × 2 minutes on ice. The solutions were centrifuged at 10000 g for 15 minutes; the supernatants were recovered and stored at −20°C.

Cell culture

MCF-7 (Breast Adenocarcinoma), DU145 (Prostate carcinoma) and HeLa (Cervical carcinoma) were obtained from the American Type Cell Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). All cell lines were cultured in DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium), supplemented with 10% FCS (Fetal calf serum), penicillin (100U/ml) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml) at 5% CO2 in a 37°C incubator.

MTT assay

The cytotoxicity of marine bacterial extracts was estimated by MTT (3-(4, 5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay. Cells were seeded at a density of 2.5 × 103 cells per well in a 384-well culture plates and treated with 1 mg/mL marine bacterial extract for 24 and 48 hr (hours). Cells were treated with 5 mM H2O2 as a positive control. Following incubation with extracts, 5 μl of sterile MTT (5 mg/mL) dissolved in PBS was added to each well and incubated with cells for 4 hr followed by the addition of 30 μl of solubilisation solution (10% SDS, 10 mM HCl) which was incubated with cells for 16 hr at 37°C. The OD (optical density) of each well was measured at 595 nm using a microtiter plate reader (BMG Labtech PHERAstar FS, Germany) and results were analyzed using Microsoft Office Excel©.

APOPercentage assay

The cells were seeded in 96 well plates at a density of 5 × 103 cells per well in duplicate in 90 μl of media. After 24 hr, cells were treated with marine bacterial extracts diluted in complete DMEM to a final concentration of 1 mg/mL and incubated at 37°C for 48 hr. Cells were treated with 2.5 mM H2O2 for 30 minutes as a positive control. The cells were stained with APOPercentage dye as per manufacturer’s instructions (Biocolor, UK). Duplicates were pooled, the OD was measured at 550 nm absorbance using a microtiter plate reader (BMG Labtech PHERAstar FS, Germany) and percentage staining was calculated.

Statistical analysis

Student’s t-test was used to compare the samples (treated vs. Untreated) and were noted to be statistically significantly different where p<0.05. All statistics including mean and SD calculations were performed using Microsoft Office Excel©.

Results

Microbial isolates

Twelve strains of marine bacteria were isolated from the Kebrit Deep, Nereus Deep, Discovery Deep and Erba Deep of the Red Sea (Table 1). The isolation of bacteria and their culturing were done by Red Sea Research Center at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology. Total 20 extracts i.e. lipophilic (chloroform) and hydrophilic (70% ethanol) have been investigated for their anticancer potential against above mentioned three human cancer cell lines.

Table 1 Taxonomic identification, location of collection and source of origin for 12 microbial strains
Full size table

Cytotoxic activities of bacterial extracts

Cytotoxic activities for the extracts were assessed by MTT assay. The growth inhibitions were measured after treating the cell lines with microbial extracts for 24 hr (Figures 1, 2 and 3). Out of total 20 bacterial extracts, 13 extracts i.e. 2C, 5C, 7C, 8C, 11C, 1E, 4E, 5E, 6E, 7E, 9E, 10E and 11E displayed maximum growth inhibitory effects on different cancer cell lines. The specific activity of different extracts for particular cell lines may be attributed to the presence of different polarity compounds. Extracts 2C, 5C, 11C, 4E, 5E, 7E and 11E (Figure 1) showed 40-60% of growth inhibition in MCF-7 cells.

Figure 1
figure 1

Percent growth inhibition of MCF-7 cells after treatment with 1 mg/mL marine bacterial extracts for 24 hr. Data were normalized to DMSO treatment controls, and error bars represent the standard deviation for triplicate experiments. Values marked as asterisk (*p<0.05 and **p<0.01) are significantly different from untreated control (Un). +ve represents positive control (H2O2).

Full size image
Figure 2
figure 2

Percent growth inhibition of HeLa cells after treatment with 1 mg/mL marine bacterial extracts for 24 hr. Data were normalized to DMSO treatment controls, and error bars represent the standard deviation for triplicate experiments. Values marked as asterisk (*p<0.05 and **p<0.01) are significantly different from untreated control (Un). +ve represents positive control (H2O2).

Full size image
Figure 3
figure 3

Percent growth inhibition of DU145 cells after treatment with 1 mg/mL marine bacterial extracts for 24 hr. Data were normalized to DMSO treatment controls, and error bars represent the standard deviation for triplicate experiments. Values marked as asterisk (*p<0.05 and **p<0.01) are significantly different from untreated control (Un). +ve represents positive control (H2O2).

Full size image

Bacterial extracts 5C, 1E, 5E and 7E (Figure 2) demonstrated 50-70% growth inhibition against HeLa cells. Extracts 1E and 5E were found to be highly active against HeLa with growth inhibition of 70% and 60% respectively. Similarly, extracts 1E, 5E, 7E and 9E inhibited the growth of DU145 cells by 40% or more after 24 hr of treatment (Figure 3). Extract 1E was the most active fraction against DU145 with about 70% growth inhibition. The comparison of data (Figures 1, 2 and 3) revealed that extract 11E is most active in MCF-7 but comparatively has low cytotoxic activity in HeLa and DU145 cells. Also, extracts 4E and 6E are only active against HeLa cells (20% and 30% growth inhibition respectively) and do not affect MCF-7 and DU145 cells. Overall, the results showed that marine bacterial extracts have cell line specific cytotoxic activity.

To observe the long term effects of the bacterial extracts on the growth of cancer cell lines, the lead extracts (2C, 5C, 7C, 8C, 11C, 1E, 4E, 5E, 6E, 7E, 10E and 11E) were further evaluated for cytotoxicity at 48 hr time point. These extracts were selected based on their activities and availability. Cell growth inhibition induced by some of the extracts was increased with time (Table 2) while for others the growth inhibition decreases slightly which may indicate the recovery of the cells, especially in the case of MCF-7 cells.

Table 2 The comparison of percentage growth inhibition of HeLa, MCF-7 and DU145 cells after treatment with 1 mg/mL marine bacterial extracts in triplicate for 24 and 48 hr
Full size table

Apoptotic evaluations

To further confirm that the mode of cell death is via apoptosis, the lead marine bacterial extracts (2C, 5C, 11C, 1E, 4E, 5E, 7E, 10E and 11E) were evaluated by APOPercentage assay. The results for this assay showed that most of the lead extracts induced apoptosis in HeLa cells (Figure 4), while in DU145 and MCF-7 cells, no significant apoptotic effect was observed at 48 hr time point, however, the bacterial extract 2C showed high apoptotic activity in MCF-7 cells (Figure 4).

Figure 4
figure 4

Percent apoptosis in HeLa, DU145 and MCF-7 cells after treatment with 1 mg/mL marine bacterial extracts. The treatment of extracts was done for 48 hr in duplicates. Data were normalized to untreated controls.

Full size image

Discussion

The results showed that most of the microbial extracts from the brine pools of the Red Sea have displayed significant cytotoxic and apoptotic activity. Cytotoxicity which was measured by MTT assay (3-[4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide), targets the activity of succinate dehydrogenase in mitochondria which in turn reduces the tetrazolium salt into formazan crystals [28]. The intensity of the color of formazan dye correlates to the number of viable cells. The isolates P1-37B (2C) and P3-37A (11C and 11E) which has 100% sequence similarity to Halomonas (Table 1) showed about 60% growth inhibition (Figure 1) in MCF-7 cell line. Not much work has been done on the anticancer activities of Halomonas sp. and very few studies have been reported so far. Marine bacterial strain GWS-BW-H8hM was reported to inhibit growth of HM02 (gastric adenocarcinoma), HepG2 (hepatocellular carcinoma) and MCF7 cell lines and induce apoptosis via cell cycle arrest [29]. Highly heterogeneous polymers i.e. exopolysaccharides (EPSs) and sulphated EPSs isolated from H. stenophila sp. inhabiting hypersaline environment have also been reported for their pro-apoptotic effects on T-leukemia cells [30]. A range of amphiphilic siderophores, loihichelins A-F, consisting of an octapeptide comprised of D-threo-β-hydroxyaspartic acid, D-serine, L-glutamine, L-serine, L-N(δ)-acetyl-N(δ)-hydroxyornithine, dehydroamino-2-butyric acid, D-serine, and cyclic N(δ)-hydroxy-D-ornithine, appended by one of a series of fatty acids ranging from decanoic acid to tetradecanoic acid have been isolated from cultures of the marine bacterium Halomonas sp. LOB-5 [8]. The isolation of cytotoxic hydroxyphenylpyrrole-dicarboxylic acids i.e. 3-(4_-hydroxyphenyl)-4-phenylpyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylic acid (HPPD-1), 3,4-di-(4_-hydroxy-phenyl)pyrrole-2,5- dicarboxylic acid (HPPD-2) and the literature-known indole derivatives 3-(hydroxyacetyl)-indole, indole-3- carboxylic acid, indole-3-carboxaldehyde, and indole-3-acetic acid have also been reported from a marine Halomonas sp. [31]. Both HPPD-1 and HPPD-2 have shown potent antitumor- promoting activities. Two most active extracts were obtained from the isolates P1-17B (1E) and P5-16B (5E), which inhibited the cell growth by 50-70% (Figures 2 and 3) in HeLa and DU145 cells and showed sequence similarity of 100% to Sulfitobacter and Halomonas respectively (Table 1). The cytotoxic activity observed in isolates P1-37B and P3-37A (Halomonas) could be due to the above mentioned cytotoxic compounds from Halomonas sp. No published records were found in PubMed regarding the cytotoxic activities and isolation of bioactive molecules from Sulfitobacter. The most prominent effect was found for extract 1E (Isolate P1-17B- Sulfitobacter) for HeLa and DU145 cell lines which makes it a suitable candidate for future isolation of bioactive molecules. Cytotoxic effects for the most active extracts were also observed at 48 hr time point and activity for some of these extracts were found to be lower than that at 24 hr (Table 2, see non-bold numbers). It may be due to the recovery of the cells from the effects of these extracts. In general the hydrophilic extracts were found to be more active than lipophilic extracts, which may indicate the presence of significant amount of cytotoxic compounds in the polar fractions as compared to the non-polar fractions.

To further confirm the cell death via apoptotic mode, APOPercentage assay was performed on the most active extracts. Apoptosis is a form of a programmed cell death where cell undergo specific hallmark changes during progression towards death [32]. It has been established that apoptosis plays a key role in death of cancer as well as normal cells [33]. The APOPercentage assay (http://www.biocolor.co.uk/) captures apoptotic cells representing a hallmark change on the surface of plasma membranes i.e. phosphatidylserine (PS) externalization. PS is found in the inner leaflet and is exposed to outer leaflet during apoptosis and this externalized PS acts as a recognition tag for multiple processes including macrophages and phagocytosis [34, 35]. The maximum apoptotic activity was displayed by isolate P1-37B (2C) in both HeLa as well as MCF-7 cells (Figure 4). Similar studies targeting bacterial extracts from other marine habitats have been published previously, mainly targeting cyanobacteria [36] and bacteria associated with other marine organisms such as seaweeds and invertebrates [37] and sponges [38, 39].

The cell line specific activity of the extracts may be attributed to the different polarity compounds. Previous studies on different cancer cell lines have shown that the variable response of cell lines towards apoptosis inducers may also be attributed to the cancer type i.e. biological differences in cell lines and different mechanisms of action of programmed cell death prevalent in different cancer cell lines [40]. Even the timeline of progression through apoptosis process can vary among cell lines [41, 42].

Conclusions

In conclusion, present work showed that extracts of most of the marine bacterial strains collected from interface of brine pools and sea water of the Red Sea have displayed significant growth inhibitory and apoptotic effect on the various cancer cell lines. The extracts from the isolates P1-37B and P3-37A (Halomonas) and P1-17B (Sulfitobacter) have been found to be the most potent against tested cancer cell lines and could be the lead candidates for the future work of isolation and structure elucidation of bioactive molecules.

Abbreviations

CTD:

Conductivity-temperature-depths

TFF:

Tangential Flow Filtration

DMEM:

Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium

FCS:

Fetal calf serum

OD:

Optical density

MTT:

3-(4, 5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide

PS:

Phosphatidylserine

HeLa:

Cervical carcinoma

MCF-7:

Breast Adenocarcinoma

DU145:

Prostate carcinoma.

References

  1. Roberts JM, Wheeler AJ, Freiwald A: Reefs of the deep: the biology and geology of cold-water coral ecosystems. Science. 2006, 312: 543-547. 10.1126/science.1119861.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Newman DJ, Cragg GM: Marine natural products and related compounds in clinical and advanced preclinical trials. J Nat Prod. 2004, 67: 1216-1238. 10.1021/np040031y.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brandt A, Gooday AJ, Brandao SN, Brix S, Brokeland W, Cedhagen T, Choudhury M, Cornelius N, Danis B, De Mesel I: First insights into the biodiversity and biogeography of the Southern Ocean deep sea. Nature. 2007, 447: 307-311. 10.1038/nature05827.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Snelgrove PVR, Smith CR: A riot of species in an environmental calm: The paradox of the species-rich deep-sea floor. Oceanography and Marine Biology, Vol 40. Volume 40. Edited by: Gibson RN, Barnes M, Atkinson RJA. 2002, London: Taylor & Francis Ltd, 311-342. Oceanography and Marine Biology]

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wright PC, Westacott RE, Burja AM: Piezotolerance as a metabolic engineering tool for the biosynthesis of natural products. Biomol Eng. 2003, 20: 325-331. 10.1016/S1389-0344(03)00042-X.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bull AT, Ward AC, Goodfellow M: Search and discovery strategies for biotechnology: the paradigm shift. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000, 64: 573-606. 10.1128/MMBR.64.3.573-606.2000.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kameyama T, Takahashi A, Kurasawa S, Ishizuka M, Okami Y, Takeuchi T, Umezawa H: Bisucaberin, a new siderophore, sensitizing tumor cells to macrophage-mediated cytolysis. I. Taxonomy of the producing organism, isolation and biological properties. J Antibiot. 1987, 40: 1664-10.7164/antibiotics.40.1664.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Homann VV, Sandy M, Tincu JA, Templeton AS, Tebo BM, Butler A: Loihichelins A− F, a Suite of Amphiphilic Siderophores Produced by the Marine Bacterium Halomonas LOB-5. J Nat Prod. 2009, 72: 884-888. 10.1021/np800640h.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Li D, Wang F, Xiao X, Zeng X, Gu QQ, Zhu W: a new cytotoxic phenazine derivative from a deep sea bacterium Bacillus sp. Arch Pharm Res. 2007, 30: 552-555. 10.1007/BF02977647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Skropeta D: Deep-sea natural products. Nat Prod Rep. 2008, 25: 1131-1166. 10.1039/b808743a.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Antunes A, Ngugi DK, Stingl U: Microbiology of the Red Sea (and other) deep‐sea anoxic brine lakes. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2011, 3: 416-433. 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00264.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bonatti E: Punctiform initiation of seafloor spreading in the Red Sea during transition from a continental to an oceanic rift. Nature. 1985, 316: 33-37. 10.1038/316033a0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Craig H: Isotopic composition and origin of the Red Sea and Salton Sea geothermal brines. Science. 1966, 154: 1544-1548. 10.1126/science.154.3756.1544.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hartmann M, Scholten J, Stoffers P, Wehner F: Hydrographic structure of brine-filled deeps in the Red Sea—new results from the Shaban, Kebrit, Atlantis II, and Discovery Deep. Mar Geol. 1998, 144: 311-330. 10.1016/S0025-3227(97)00055-8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anschutz P, Blanc G: The development of layering, fluxes through double-diffusive interfaces, and location of hydrothermal sources. J Geophys Res. 1998, 103: 27,809-827,819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmidt M, Botz R, Faber E, Schmitt M, Poggenburg J, Garbe-Schönberg D, Stoffers P: High-resolution methane profiles across anoxic brine-seawater boundaries in the Atlantis-II, Discovery, and Kebrit deeps (Red Sea). Chem Geol. 2003, 200: 359-375. 10.1016/S0009-2541(03)00206-7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Beech FW, Davenport RR: Isolation, purification, and maintenance of yeasts. Methods in microbiology. Vol. 4. Edited by: Booth C. 1971, London: Academic Press, 169-

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dieffenbach CW, Dveksler GS: PCR primer: a laboratory manual. 2003, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Pr

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sorokin DY: Sulfitobacter pontiacus gen. nov., sp. nov. - a new heterotrophic bacterium from the Black Sea, specialized on sulfite oxidation. Microbiology. 1995, 64: 295-305.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kaye JZ, Baross JA: High incidence of halotolerant bacteria in Pacific hydrothermal-vent and pelagic environments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2000, 32: 249-260. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2000.tb00718.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaye JZ, Marquez MC, Ventosa A, Baross JA: Halomonas neptunia sp. nov. Halomonas sulfidaeris sp. nov. Halomonas axialensis sp. nov. and Halomonas hydrothermalis sp. nov.: halophilic bacteria isolated from deep-sea hydrothermal-vent environments. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2004, 54: 499-511. 10.1099/ijs.0.02799-0.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Brettar I, Christen R, Hofle MG: Idiomarina baltica sp. nov. a marine bacterium with a high optimum growth temperature isolated from surface water of the central Baltic Sea. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2003, 53: 407-413. 10.1099/ijs.0.02399-0.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Romanenko LA, Schumann P, Rohde M, Zhukova NV, Mikhailov VV, Stackebrandt E: Marinobacter bryozoorum sp. nov. and Marinobacter sediminum sp. nov. novel bacteria from the marine environment. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2005, 55: 143-148. 10.1099/ijs.0.63258-0.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Arahal DR, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH, Ventosa A: Phylogeny of the family Halomonadaceae based on 23S and 165 rDNA sequence analyses. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2002, 52: 241-249.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gomez-Gil B, Fajer-Avila E, Pascual J, Macian MC, Pujalte MJ, Garay E, Roque A: Vibrio sinaloensis sp. nov. isolated from the spotted rose snapper, Lutjanus guttatus Steindachner, 1869. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2008, 58: 1621-1624. 10.1099/ijs.0.65719-0.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cho BC, Hwang CY: Prokaryotic abundance and 16S rRNA gene sequences detected in marine aerosols on the East Sea (Korea). FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011, 76: 327-341. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01053.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tang J, Zheng A-p, Bromfield E, Zhu J, Li S-c, Wang S-q, Deng Q-m, Li P: 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis of halophilic and halotolerant bacteria isolated from a hypersaline pond in Sichuan, China. Ann Microbiol. 2011, 61: 375-381. 10.1007/s13213-010-0137-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang HZ, Chang CH, Lin CP, Tsai MC: Using MTT viability assay to test the cytotoxicity of antibiotics and steroid to cultured porcine corneal endothelial cells. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 1996, 12: 35-43. 10.1089/jop.1996.12.35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bitzer J, Grosse T, Wang L, Lang S, Beil W, Zeeck A: New aminophenoxazinones from a marine Halomonas sp. fermentation, structure elucidation, and biological activity. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2006, 59: 86-92. 10.1038/ja.2006.12.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ruiz-Ruiz C, Srivastava GK, Carranza D, Mata JA, Llamas I, Santamaria M, Quesada E, Molina IJ: An exopolysaccharide produced by the novel halophilic bacterium Halomonas stenophila strain B100 selectively induces apoptosis in human T leukaemia cells. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011, 89: 345-355. 10.1007/s00253-010-2886-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang L, Grosse T, Stevens H, Brinkhoff T, Simon M, Liang L, Bitzer J, Bach G, Zeeck A, Tokuda H, Lang S: Bioactive hydroxyphenylpyrrole-dicarboxylic acids from a new marine Halomonas sp. Production and structure elucidation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006, 72: 816-822. 10.1007/s00253-006-0370-1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schwartz LM, Osborne BA: Programmed cell death, apoptosis and killer genes. Immunol Today. 1993, 14: 582-590. 10.1016/0167-5699(93)90197-S.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lowe SW, Lin AW: Apoptosis in cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2000, 21: 485-495. 10.1093/carcin/21.3.485.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fadok VA, Laszlo DJ, Noble PW, Weinstein L, Riches DW, Henson PM: Particle digestibility is required for induction of the phosphatidylserine recognition mechanism used by murine macrophages to phagocytose apoptotic cells. J Immunol. 1993, 151: 4274-4285.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fadok VA, Voelker DR, Campbell PA, Cohen JJ, Bratton DL, Henson PM: Exposure of phosphatidylserine on the surface of apoptotic lymphocytes triggers specific recognition and removal by macrophages. J Immunol. 1992, 148: 2207-2216.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Martins RF, Ramos MF, Herfindal L, Sousa JA, Skaerven K, Vasconcelos VM: Antimicrobial and cytotoxic assessment of marine cyanobacteria - Synechocystis and Synechococcus. Mar Drugs. 2008, 6: 1-11. 10.3390/md6010001.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Lin J, Yan XJ, Zheng L, Ma HH, Chen HM: Cytotoxicity and apoptosis induction of some selected marine bacteria metabolites. J Appl Microbiol. 2005, 99: 1373-1382. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02741.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Schupp PJ, Kohlert-Schupp C, Whitefield S, Engemann A, Rohde S, Hemscheidt T, Pezzuto JM, Kondratyuk TP, Park EJ, Marler L: Cancer chemopreventive and anticancer evaluation of extracts and fractions from marine macro- and microorganisms collected from Twilight Zone waters around Guam. Nat Prod Commun. 2009, 4: 1717-1728.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Thakur AN, Thakur NL, Indap MM, Pandit RA, Datar VV, Muller WE: Antiangiogenic, antimicrobial, and cytotoxic potential of sponge-associated bacteria. Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2005, 7: 245-252. 10.1007/s10126-004-4085-y.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Studzinski GP: Cell growth and apoptosis: a practical approach. 1995, Oxford: IRL Press at the Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  41. Härtel S, Zorn-Kruppa M, Tykhonova S, Alajuuma P, Engelke M, Diehl HA: Staurosporine‐induced apoptosis in human cornea epithelial cells in vitro. Cytometry A. 2003, 55: 15-23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jessel R, Haertel S, Socaciu C, Tykhonova S, Diehl HA: Kinetics of apoptotic markers in exogeneously induced apoptosis of EL4 cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2002, 6: 82-92. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2002.tb00313.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the crew of the RV Aegaeo and the KAUST core facility for marine research for help during the expedition. This study was funded partly by the SEDCO Research Excellence Award to US and VBB.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Computational Bioscience Research Center, Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia

    Sunil Sagar, Luke Esau, Vladimir B Bajic & Mandeep Kaur

  2. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Red Sea Research Center, Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia

    Tyas Hikmawan, Andre Antunes, Karie Holtermann & Ulrich Stingl

Authors
  1. Sunil Sagar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luke Esau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tyas Hikmawan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andre Antunes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Karie Holtermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ulrich Stingl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Vladimir B Bajic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mandeep Kaur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunil Sagar.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Authors’ contribution

SS and MK planned the study, wrote manuscript and performed experiments along with LE. TH isolated the strains and provides taxonomic classification of the bacterial strains. AA was responsible for the sample collection. KH was responsible for growth of the strains in large batches. US was responsible for the planning of the expedition and the cultivation experiments, provided general coordination of the study and helped in manuscript writing. VBB provided general coordination of the study and helped in manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sagar, S., Esau, L., Hikmawan, T. et al. Cytotoxic and apoptotic evaluations of marine bacteria isolated from brine-seawater interface of the Red Sea. BMC Complement Altern Med 13, 29 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-13-29

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-13-29

Keywords

  • Marine bacteria
  • Deep sea brine pools
  • Extracts
  • Cytotoxicity
  • Apoptosis

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies

ISSN: 2662-7671

Contact us