Skip to main content
Download PDF

Phenolic content, antioxidant effect and cytotoxic activity of Leea indica leaves

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine volume 12, Article number: 128 (2012) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The leaves of Leea indica (Vitaceae), commonly known as ‘Huo Tong Shu’ in Malaysia, have been traditionally used as natural remedy in folk medicine by the locals. The current study reports the outcome of antioxidant and cytotoxic investigation of L. indica leaves. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of L. indica leaf crude ethanol and its fractionated extracts (hexane, ethyl acetate and water) for evaluation of total phenolic content, antioxidant effect and cytotoxic activity against colon cancer cell lines.

Methods

In the present study, L. indica leaf crude ethanol and its fractionated extracts (hexane, ethyl acetate and water) were firstly prepared prior to phenolic content, antioxidant effect and cytotoxic activity assessment. Folin-Ciocalteau’s method was used for the measurement of total phenolic content of the extracts. The antioxidant activity was measured by employing three different established testing systems, such as scavenging activity on DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) radicals, reducing power assay and SOD (superoxide dismutase) activity assay. The cytotoxic activity of the extracts were evaluated against three colon cancer cell lines with varying molecular characteristics (HT-29, HCT-15 and HCT-116) by MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] assay.

Results

The total phenolic content and antioxidant capabilities differed significantly among the L. indica leaf extracts. A strong correlation between total phenolic content and antioxidant properties was found, indicating that phenolic compounds are the major contributor to the antioxidant properties of these extracts. Among the crude ethanol and its fractionated extracts, fractionated water extract showed significantly the highest total phenolic content and strongest antioxidant effect in all the antioxidant testing systems employed in this study. All the four extracts exert no damage to the selected colon cancer cells.

Conclusions

The data obtained in these testing systems clearly establish the antioxidant potency of the fractionated water extract of L. indica leaves. Additional studies should be carried out to isolate and identify the bioactive compounds in the fractionated water extract, in order to provide more convincing evidence.

Peer Review reports

Background

At present, naturally derived products play an important role as source of medicine. Many pharmaceutical agents have been discovered by screening natural products from plants, based on ethnopharmacological data which provides a substantially increased chance of finding active plants relative to a random approach.

Leea indica (Vitaceae), commonly known as ‘Huo Tong Shu’ in Malaysia, have been traditionally used as natural remedy in folk medicine by the locals. It is a perennial shrub which can be found in tropical and subtropical countries, such as Thailand, Malaysia, India and China. The leaves and roots of L. indica are traditionally used for the treatment of cancer, diabetes, diarrhea, dysentery, spasm and skin diseases [1, 2]. The leaves are generally consumed by locals either raw or taken as a concoction brewed from fresh leaves. The whole plant is also used as remedy for the relief of headache, body pains and skin complains [3].

There are limited phytochemical studies reported on L. indica leaves [4–6] and essential oil of flowers [7]. To our knowledge, although the leaves of L. indica is reported to be used in a large number of Malaysian traditional medicine preparations, there is not much recorded data on biological studies of L. indica leaves. An investigation by Saha et al. [8] reported that the crude methanol extract from the whole plant of L. indica showed high antioxidant and nitric oxide inhibitory activities, by employing FTC (ferric thiocyanate), TBA (thiobarbituric acid), DPPH free radical scavenging methods and Griess assay. A later report by Temkitthawaon et al. [9] indicated that the crude ethanol extract of L. indica roots showed potent phosphodiesterase inhibitory activity. However, a report by Nurhanan et al. [10] stated that the crude methanol extracts of leaf, stem and bark of L. indica did not showed any anti-proliferative activities against the breast cancer cell lines. Additionally, the essential oil of L. indica flowers showed only moderate antibacterial activity against the tested bacteria [7]. More recent investigations by Hsiung et al. [11] and Wong et al. [12] reported that the ethyl acetate fraction of L. indica leaves and the mollic acid arabinose isolated from it induced growth-inhibitory effect and apoptosis in Ca Ski human cervical cancer cells.

The current study aimed to investigate the total phenolic content, antioxidant effect and cytotoxic activity of L. indica leaves. The antioxidant potency of L. indica leaves have been investigated, employing three different established in vitro testing systems, such as scavenging activity on DPPH radicals, reducing power assay and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity assay. The total phenolic content of the leaf extracts was also accessed by Folin-Ciocalteau’s method. To our knowledge, there is no antioxidant study reported for L. indica leaves. Thus, the antioxidant activity of L. indica leaves was evaluated as it has not been determined previously.

In view of the traditional usage of L. indica in cancer-related diseases and the investigation by Hsiung et al. [11] and Wong et al. [4, 12] which indicated the potential use of L. indica in the treatment of Ca Ski human cervical cancer cells, it was thus necessary to further expand this area of research to other cancer cell lines. According to Malaysian Cancer Statistics [13], colorectal cancer is one of the leading cancers in Malaysia and a total of 2,866 cancer cases were diagnosed among Malaysians in Peninsular Malaysia in the year 2006. In this study, we evaluated the cytotoxic activity of the extracts against three colon cancer cell lines with varying molecular characteristics, HT-29 (APC, type II truncation and COX-2 constitutive expression), HCT-15 (COX-2 deficient) and HCT 116 (APC, wild-type and COX-2 inducible) [14]. The resulting information will certainly provide scientific support upon the traditional usage of L. indica.

Methods

Chemicals and reagents

Gallic acid, BHA (butylated hydroxyanisole), ascorbic acid, DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl), potassium ferricyanide, Folin-Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent, MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide], RPMI 1640 medium and McCoy’s 5A medium were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Company. Trichloroacetic acid, ferric chloride, ethanol, hexane and ethyl acetate were purchased from Merck Company. Foetal bovine serum, penicillin, streptomycin and fungizone were from PAA Lab (Austria). SOD (superoxide dismutase) kit was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Company.

Plant sample collection and identification

The fresh leaves of L. indica were collected from Seremban, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia in February 2011. The plants were identified by Dr Yong Kien Thai of Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Malaysia and a voucher specimen (herbarium no: KLU47724) was deposited at the herbarium of the Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Preparation of extracts

The extracts were prepared as previously described [15]. Briefly, the leaves of L. indica (2.70kg) were washed, dried (38°C) and ground to fine powder (1.60kg, 59.26%). The dried, ground leaves (300.30g) were extracted with ethanol (3x 1.5L) at room temperature yielding a dark green crude ethanol extract (27.80g, 9.26%). The ethanol extract (24.80g) was further extracted with hexane to give a hexane-soluble extract (5.80g, 23.39%) and a hexane insoluble residue. The hexane-insoluble residue was further partitioned between ethyl acetate–water (1:1, 100ml: 100ml) to give an ethyl acetate-soluble extract (3.60g, 14.52%). The water layer was freeze-dried to give a brown coloured fractionated water extract (3.60g, 14.52%). All the extracts (ethanol, hexane, ethyl acetate and water) were kept in the dark at 4°C for not more than one week prior to evaluation of total phenolic content, antioxidant effect and cytotoxicity.

Determination of total phenolic content

The concentrations of phenolic compounds in the extracts of L. indica leaves were measured according to the Folin-Ciocalteu method as previously described [16]. Briefly, extract solution (0.02ml) at different concentrations (concentrations ranging from 0 to 20mg/ml) was mixed with 1.58ml of distilled water. Folin-Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent (0.1ml) was then added to each test tube. After 3min, 0.3ml of saturated sodium carbonate solution was added to the mixture. The reaction mixtures were incubated in dark at 40°C for 30min. The absorbance was measured at 765nm with a spectrophotometer. All extracts were assayed in triplicate. Gallic acid solutions with concentrations ranging from 25 to 1000mg/l were used for calibration. A dose response linear regression was generated by using the gallic acid standard absorbance and the levels in the samples were expressed as gallic acid equivalents (mg of GAEs/g of extract).

Scavenging activity on 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radicals

The scavenging activity of the extracts of L. indica on DPPH radicals was measured according to the method as previously described [16]. Briefly, extract solution with different concentrations (concentrations ranging from 0 to 5mg/ml) was mixed with 0.8% of DPPH solution. The reaction mixtures were incubated at room temperature and allowed to react for 30minutes in the dark. All measurements were done in dim light. The absorbance was measured at 520nm with a spectrophotometer. All assays were conducted in triplicate. The scavenging activity (%) on DPPH radical was calculated according to the following equation:

Scavenging activity (%)=[(Acontrol-Asample)/Acontrol] x 100%; where Acontrol is the absorbance of the control and Asample is the absorbance of the tested extract.

The scavenging ability of the extracts was expressed as EC50 value, which is the effective concentration at which 50% of DPPH radicals were scavenged. The EC50 value was obtained from the graph of scavenging activity (%) versus concentration of samples. Ascorbic acid was used as positive reference standard.

Reducing power assay

The reducing power of the prepared extracts was determined according to method as previously described [16]. Briefly, extract solution at different concentrations (concentrations ranging from 0 to 0.8mg/ml) was added with 2.5ml of 0.2M phosphate buffer (pH 6.6) and 2.5ml of 1% (w/v) solution of potassium ferricyanide. The mixture was incubated in a water bath at 50°C for 20min. Following this, 2.5ml of 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid solution was added and the mixture was then centrifuged at 1000rpm for 10min. A 2.5ml aliquot of the upper layer was combined with 2.5ml of distilled water and 0.5ml of a 0.1% (w/v) solution of ferric chloride. The absorbance was measured at 700nm with a spectrophotometer. All assays were conducted in triplicate. Ascorbic acid was used as positive reference standard.

Detection of superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity

SOD activity was measured using water-soluble tetrazolium salt (WST) according to the method described by [17]. This method utilizes Dojindo’s WST-1, which can produce a water soluble formazan dye upon reduction with superoxide anion. After addition of all the working solution and extract solution with different concentrations (concentrations ranging from 0 to 20mg/ml) in each well as described in the SOD kit manual, the ninety-six-well microplate was agitated and incubated at 37°C for 20min. Absorbance was taken using microplate reader (Oasys UVM340) at 450nm. Percentage inhibition of each sample was calculated by using following equation: {[(B1 – B3) - (S – B2)]/(B1 – B3)} x 100 where B1, B2, B3 and S were the absorbance at 450nm for Blank 1, Blank 2, Blank 3 and sample, respectively. BHA was used as positive reference standard.

Cell lines and culture medium

The colon cancer cell lines HT-29, HCT-15 and HCT-116 were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, USA). The HCT-15 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium; HCT 116 and HT-29 cells in McCoy’s 5A medium, supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum, 2% penicillin or streptomycin and 1% of fungizone. The cells were cultured in a 5% CO2 incubator (Shel Lab water-jacketed) kept at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere.

MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] assay

The cytotoxic activities of samples were evaluated using MTT assay according to the method described by Mosmann [18]. Cytotoxicity of each extract was expressed as IC50 value, which is the concentration of extract that reduced the viability of the cells by 50% compared to the control, which were treated with 0.5% DMSO. Three replicate plates were performed for each sample. Cis-platin was used as positive reference standard.

Statistical analysis

The antioxidant data in the present study were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the significance of the difference between the means was determined by the Duncan’s multiple range tests at 95% least significant difference (p<0.05). The Pearson correlation analysis was performed to determine the correlation between total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of the extracts. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. The IC50 values for cytotoxic activity were obtained by non-linear regression using GraphPad Prism statistical software.

Results and discussion

Total phenolic content of L. indica leaf extracts

The antioxidant activity of phenolics (such as phenolic acids, flavonoids and tannins) is mainly due to their redox properties, which allow them to act as reducing agents, hydrogen donators, and singlet oxygen quenchers [19]. The Folin-Ciocalteu method is a routine assay in studying phenolic antioxidants as it is rapid, convenient, simple and reproducible. In the present study, the absorbance value of the L. indica extract after subtraction of control (y) was translated into total phenolic content [mg/l of gallic acid equivalents (GAEs)] using the gallic acid calibration plot with the following formula:

Totalphenoliccontent=(y+ 0 .0272)/ 0 .0009;R 2 = 0.9959
(1)

The quantification for total phenolic content in the L. indica leaf extracts, expressed as mg of GAEs/g of extract is shown in Table1. All extracts contained a considerable amount of phenolic metabolites from 1.27 to 37.29mg of GAEs/g of extract. The highest amount was found in the fractionated water extract (37.29mg of GAEs/g of extract), followed by ethanol (19.15mg of GAEs/g of extract), ethyl acetate (15.61mg of GAEs/g of extract) and hexane (1.27mg of GAEs/g of extract) extracts in the decreasing order. The hexane extract showed the lowest phenolic content although the yield of hexane extract was the highest among the fractionated extracts (refer to the section ‘preparation of extracts’). The significantly higher (p<0.05) phenolic content in the fractionated water extract than in the crude ethanol extract was probably due to the concentration of phenolic compounds in this fractionated extract. In the previous study reported by Srinivasan et al. [6], gallic acid which is a strong naturally occurring antioxidant was identified in the leaf extract. The high phenolic content in the fractionated water extract might contribute towards the antioxidant activities and curative ability adsorbing and neutralising free radicals.

Table 1 Total phenolic content of L. indica extracts
Full size table

Antioxidant activities of L. indica leaf extracts

There are various published methods measuring the antioxidant capacity in vitro, but no single assay is capable to determine the total antioxidant ability of a studied sample. Previous studies [20, 21] indicated that more than one antioxidant capacity measurement is needed in order to take into account the various modes of antioxidants’ actions. Thus, the antioxidant activity of L. indica leaf extracts were evaluated by employing three different established testing systems, such as scavenging activity on DPPH radicals, reducing power assay and SOD activity assay. These three assays have been widely used to assess the antioxidant abilities of studied sample as they required relatively standard equipment and reproducible results.

Scavenging activity of L. indica leaf extracts on DPPH radicals

Free radical scavenging is one of the known mechanisms by which antioxidants inhibit lipid oxidation. DPPH is a nitrogen-centered free radical which stable in room temperature. The reducing capability of the DPPH is determined by the reduction in its absorbance measured at 520nm induced by antioxidants. The decrease in the absorbance of DPPH caused by antioxidants is due to the reaction between antioxidant molecules and radical, which results in the scavenging of the radical by electron transfer.

In the DPPH scavenging assay, leaf extracts of L. indica were investigated through the free radical scavenging activity via their reaction with the stable DPPH radicals. The radical scavenging activity (EC50) values of the extracts are shown in Table2. Low EC50 value indicates strong ability of the extract to act as DPPH scavenger. A high EC50 value indicates low scavenging activity of the scavengers as more amounts of the scavengers were required to achieve 50% scavenging reaction. This means, the scavengers are less effective in scavenging the DPPH radicals. Among the four extracts, the fractionated water extract (EC50 48μg/ml) showed the strongest scavenging activity compared with the standard ascorbic acid, followed by ethanol (EC50 60μg/ml) and ethyl acetate (EC50 68μg/ml) extracts. The hexane extract showed the weakest scavenging activity on DPPH radicals with the EC50 value of 1285μg/ml. The present result is consistent with the previous data reported by Saha et al. [8], which showed that methanol extract from the whole plant of L. indica also showed strong free radical scavenging activity comparable with quercetin, BHT (2,6-di-t-butyl-4-methylphenol) and Vitamin C.

Table 2 The scavenging activity (EC 50 values) of L. indica extracts on DPPH radicals
Full size table

The results in Table1 and Table2 show that there is a positive correlation between higher total phenolic content in the extracts and stronger DPPH scavenging activity. This conclusion is supported by published reports which indicated that phenolic substances generally well-correlated with scavenging activity on DPPH radicals [22, 23]. Hence, the strong DPPH scavenging activity of fractionated water extract (Table2) may be attributed by the high content of phenolic compounds (Table1), although other antioxidants may present in the fractionated water extract as well.

Reducing power of L. indica leaf extracts

Previous studies have pointed out that the antioxidant capability is always related to the development of reductones which can terminate the free radical chain reactions [24–26]. The reducing power of L. indica extracts are shown in Table3. In the reducing power assay, a stronger absorbance indicates a higher reducing power. The extracts that showed comparable absorbance readings with the positive reference standard are considered to have high reducing power.

Table 3 Reducing power of L. indica extracts at various concentrations
Full size table

The reducing power of the four extracts varied significantly (p<0.05) at different concentrations (Table3). The reducing power of all the extracts increased gradually with the increase in concentrations of the extracts. Generally, the fractionated water extract showed a significantly (p<0.05) higher reducing power at all the tested concentrations compared to the other extracts. This was followed by ethanol and ethyl acetate extracts, while the hexane extract showed the lowest reducing power among all the tested concentrations. At concentration 0.8mg/ml, the reducing power of fractionated water extract was comparable to that of ascorbic acid. A strong correlation (r=0.928) was found between total amount of phenols and reducing power of L. indica extracts (Figure1), indicating that the phenol compounds play an important role in the reducing power of the extracts. This finding is in agreement with previous publication by Krishnaiah et al. [27].

Figure 1
figure 1

Correlation between total phenolic content and reducing power of L. indica leaf extracts. Correlation coefficient r=0.928 (p>0.01).

Full size image

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity of L. indica leaf extracts

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) which catalyzes the dismutation of superoxide anion into hydrogen peroxide and molecular oxygen is one of the most important antioxidative enzymes [28]. In the present study, a sensitive water-soluble tetrazolium salt, WST-1 [2-(4-iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2,4-disulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, monosodium salt] was used in the SOD assay. WST-1 produces a high water-soluble formazan dye upon reduction with superoxide anion. The rate of the reduction with superoxide anion is linearly related to xanthine oxidase activity, and is inhibited by SOD. Thus, the inhibition activity of SOD can be determined by measuring the superoxide anion-caused formation of water-soluble dye. Higher SOD activity will reduce the formation of formazan and indirectly lower the absorbance reading as well.

The SOD activity of L. indica leaf extracts is shown in Table4. All the extracts showed similar levels of SOD activity (94.36-100.00% inhibition rate) with the positive reference BHA (100% inhibition rate) at highest concentration tested (20mg/ml). The hexane, ethyl acetate and ethanol extracts possessed significantly stronger inhibition rate than positive reference BHA in SOD activity at lower concentrations tested (0.002-2.000mg/ml). Among the L. indica extracts, fractionated water extract showed the strongest inhibition rate in the SOD assay significantly (p<0.05), followed by ethyl acetate and ethanol extracts. In this assay, the hexane extract showed the lowest inhibition rate at all the tested concentrations. Strong correlation was found between the SOD activity and total phenolic content determined by Folin-Ciocalteu method (Table1). This result is in agreement with previous report that indicates SOD activity can be related to phenolic content [29].

Table 4 Inhibition rate of L. indica leaf extracts measured by SOD assay
Full size table

In vitro cytotoxic activity of L. indica extracts

The cytotoxic activity of the L. indica leaf extracts against three colon cancer cell lines with varying molecular characteristics, HT-29 (APC, type II truncation and COX-2 constitutive expression), HCT-15 (COX-2 deficient) and HCT 116 (APC, wild-type and COX-2 inducible) were evaluated by MTT assay in the present study. MTT assay measures the cell viability based on the reduction of yellow tetrazolium MTT to purple formazon dye by mitochondrial dehydrogenase enzyme. The amount of formazon reflects the number of metabolically active viable cells [30]. According to the United States National Cancer Institute plant screening program, a plant extract is generally considered to have active cytotoxic effect if the IC50 value is 20μg/ml or less, after incubation between 48 to 72hours [31]. Table5 shows the results of cytotoxicity screening of L. indica leaf extracts, expressed as IC50 values, averaged from three experiments. All the four extracts of L. indica leaf extracts did not show cytotoxic effects against the three tested human colon cancer cell lines (IC50≥100μg/ml in all cases) after incubation for 72hours. According to the published data reported by Nurhanan et al. [10], the methanol extracts of L. indica did not exert any cytotoxicity against the MCF-7 and T47D breast cancer cell lines (IC50>100μg/ml in both cell lines).

Table 5 Cytotoxic activity (IC 50 values) of L. indica extracts against three human colon cancer cell lines
Full size table

Conclusions

This study was designed to investigate the phenolic content, antioxidant effect and cytotoxic activity of L. indica leaf extracts. The antioxidant activity of the extracts correlated well with the total phenolic contents and indicated that phenolic compounds are dominant contributors to the antioxidant activity of the extracts. This finding is supported by published manuscript [32] which indicates that phenolic compounds have the abilities to quench lipid peroxidation, prevent DNA oxidative damage and scavenge the reactive oxygen species. Overall, the fractionated water extract of L. indica leaves which contained the highest amount of phenolic compounds, exhibited outstanding reducing power, strong DPPH radical scavenging activity and pronounced inhibition rate in SOD assay. All the four extracts exert no damage to the selected colon cancer cells (HT-29, HCT-15 and HCT-116) in the MTT assay.

The data obtained in these testing systems clearly establish the antioxidant potency of the fractionated water extract of L. indica leaves. Future studies should be carried out to identify the active compounds in the fractionated water extract, in order to provide more convincing evidence. An investigation into this phenomenon is now underway.

References

  1. Chatterjee A: Prakashi SC: The Treatise on Indian Medicinal Plants. 1994, New Delhi: NISCAIR Press

    Google Scholar 

  2. Prajapati ND, Purohit SS, Sharma AK, Kumar T: A Handbook of Medicinal Plants – A Complete Source Book. 2003, Jodhpur: Agrobios (I)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burkill IH: A Dictionary of the Economic Products of the Malay Peninsula. 1966, London: Crown Agents

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wong YH, Kadir HA: Bioassay-guided isolation of cytotoxic cycloartane triterpenoid glycosides from the traditionally used medicnal plant Leea indica. Evid-based Compl Alt. 2012, : 164689-

  5. Saha K, Lajis NH, Shaari K, Hamzah AS, Israf DA: Chemical constituents of Leea indica (Burm. F.) Merr. (Leeaceae). Malaysian Journal of Science. 2005, 24: 75-78.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Srinivasan GV, Ranjith C, Vijayan KK: Identification of chemical compounds from the leaves of Leea indica. Acta Pharm. 2008, 58: 207-214. 10.2478/v10007-008-0002-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Srinivasan GV, Sharanappa P, Leela NK, Sadashiva CT, Vijayan KK: Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Leea indica (Burm. F.) Merr. flowers. Nat Prod Rad. 2009, 8: 488-493.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saha K, Lajis NH, Israf DA, Hamzah AS, Khozirah S, Khamis S, Syahida A: Evaluation of antioxidant and nitric oxide inhibitory activities of selected Malaysian medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 92: 263-267. 10.1016/j.jep.2004.03.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Temkitthawon P, Viyoch J, Limpeanchob N, Pongamonkul W, Sirikul C, Kumpila A, Suwanborirux K, Ingkaninan K: Screening for phosphodiesterase inhibitory activity of Thai medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 119: 214-217. 10.1016/j.jep.2008.05.034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nurhanan MY, Asiah O, Mohd Ilham MA, Siti Syarifah MM, Norhayati I, Lili Sahira H: Anti-proliferative activities of 32 Malaysian plant species in breast cancer cell lines. J Trop Forest Sci. 2008, 20: 77-81.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hsiung WY, Kadir HA: Leea indica ethyl acetate fraction induces growth-inhibitory effect in various cancer cell lines and apoptosis in Ca Ski human cervical epidermoid carcinoma cells. Evid-based Compl Alt. 2011, : 293060-

  12. Wong YH, Kadir HA: Induction of mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in Ca Ski human cervical cancer cells triggered by mollic acid arabinoside idolated from Leea indica. Evid-based Compl Alt. 2012, : 684740-

  13. Omar AA, Ali ZM, Tamin NSI: Malaysian Cancer Statistics – Data and Figure Peninsular Malaysia 2006. 2006, Malaysia: National Cancer Registry, Ministry of Health Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  14. Campbell SE, Stone WL, Lee S, Whaley S, Yang H, Qui M, GOforth P, Sherman D, McHaffie D, Krishnan K: Comparative effects of RRR-alpha- and RRR-gamma-tocopherol on proliferation and apoptosis in human colon cancer cell lines. BMC Cancer. 2006, 6: 13-10.1186/1471-2407-6-13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Malek SNA, Phang CW, Ibrahim H, Wahab NA, Sim KS: Phytochemical and cytotoxic investigations of Alpinia mutica rhizomes. Molecules. 2011, 16: 583-589. 10.3390/molecules16010583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sim KS, Sri Nurestri AM, Norhanom AW: Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of crude and fractionated extracts of Pereskia bleo (Kunth) DC. (Cactaceae). Afr J Pharm Pharmacol. 2010, 4: 193-201.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou JY, Prognon P: Raw material enzymatic activity determination: A specific case for validation and comparison of analytical methods - The example of superoxide dismutase (SOD). J Pharmaceut Biomed Anal. 2006, 40: 1143-1148. 10.1016/j.jpba.2005.09.022.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mosmann T: Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983, 1–2: 55-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kahkonen MP, Hopia AI, Vuorela HJ, Rauha J-P, Pihlaja K, Kujala TS, Heinonen M: Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds. J Agric Food Chem. 1999, 47: 3954-3962. 10.1021/jf990146l.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang D, Ou B, Prior RL: The chemistry behind antioxidant capacity assays. J Agric Food Chem. 2005, 53: 1841-1856. 10.1021/jf030723c.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Prior RL, Cao G: In vivo total antioxidant capacity: comparison of different analytical methods. Free Radical Biol Med. 1999, 27: 1173-1181. 10.1016/S0891-5849(99)00203-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tabart J, Kevers C, Pincemail J, Defraigne JO, Dommes J: Antioxidant capacities of black current varies with organ, season and cultivar. J Agric Food Chem. 2006, 54: 6271-6276. 10.1021/jf061112y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tabart J, Kevers C, Pincemail J, Defraigne JO, Dommes J: Comparative antioxidant capacities of phenolic compounds measured by various tests. Food Chem. 2009, 113: 1226-1233. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.08.013.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Duan X-J, Zhang WW, Li XM, Wang BG: Evaluation of antioxidant property of extract and fractions obtained from a red alga, Polysiphonia Urceolata. Food Chem. 2006, 95: 37-43. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.12.015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dorman HJD, Kosar M, Kahlos K, Holm Y, Hiltunen R: Antioxidant properties and composition of aqueous extracts from Mentha species, hybrids, varieties, and cultivars. J Agric Food Chem. 2003, 51: 4563-4569. 10.1021/jf034108k.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shon MY, Kim TH, Sung NJ: Antioxidants and free radical scavenging activity of Phellinus baumii (Phellinus of Hymenochaetaceae) extracts. Food Chem. 2003, 82: 593-597. 10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00015-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Krishnaiah D, Sarbatly R, Nithyanandam: A review of the antioxidant potential of medicinal plant species. Food Bioprod Process. 2011, 89: 217-233. 10.1016/j.fbp.2010.04.008.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Weisiger RA, Fridovich I: Mitochondrial superoxide dismutase site of synthesis and intramitochondrial localization. J Biol Chem. 1973, 248: 3582-3592.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dudonne S, Vitrac X, Coutiere P, Woillez M, Merillon J-M: Comparative study of antioxidant properties and total phenolic content of 30 plant extracts of industrial interest using DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, SOD, and ORAC assays. J Agric Food Chem. 2009, 57: 1768-1774. 10.1021/jf803011r.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Van de Loosdrecht AA, Beelan RHJ, Ossenkoppele GJ, Broekhoven MG, Langenhuijsen MMAC: A tetrazolium-based colorimetric MTT assay to quantitate human monocyte mediated cytotoxicity against leukemic cells from cell lines and patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Immunol Methods. 1994, 174: 311-320. 10.1016/0022-1759(94)90034-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee CC, Houghton P: Cytotoxicity of plants from Malaysia and Thailand used traditionally to treat cancer. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 100: 237-243. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.01.064.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yoo KM, Lee CH, Lee H, Moon B, Lee CY: Relative antioxidant and cytoprotective activities of common herbs. Food Chem. 2008, 106: 929-936. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.07.006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by research funding from University of Malaya (UMRG RG047/11BIO). We are also grateful to Dr Yong KT from Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Malaysia for plant identification.

Author details

1Institutional address: Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2Institutional address: Biology Division, Centre for Foundation Studies In Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institutional address: Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Nidyaletchmy Subba Reddy, Suerialoasan Navanesan, Saravana Kumar Sinniah & Kae Shin Sim

  2. Institutional address: Biology Division, Centre for Foundation Studies In Science, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Norhanom Abdul Wahab

Authors
  1. Nidyaletchmy Subba Reddy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Suerialoasan Navanesan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Saravana Kumar Sinniah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Norhanom Abdul Wahab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kae Shin Sim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kae Shin Sim.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

RNS prepared the extracts and carried out the total phenolic content as well as the antioxidant studies. NS worked on the cytotoxicity screening. SSK co-worked on antioxidant assays and analyzed the data for antioxidant assays. WNA evaluated the data and edited the manuscript. SKS designed the current project, supervised the work and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reddy, N.S., Navanesan, S., Sinniah, S.K. et al. Phenolic content, antioxidant effect and cytotoxic activity of Leea indica leaves. BMC Complement Altern Med 12, 128 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-128

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-128

Keywords

  • Leea indica
  • Vitaceae
  • Antioxidant
  • Colon cancer cells
  • Phenolic content

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies

ISSN: 2662-7671

Contact us