Skip to main content

Table 3 A comparison of MAP and HR at distinct junctures between the two groups

From: Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on remifentanil dosage during craniotomy aneurysm clipping: a prospective, randomized controlled study

 

Group

P-value

Sham TEAS group

TEAS group

MAP/mmHg

   

T0

109.20 ± 9.12

104.40 ± 12.32

0.169

T1

87.75 ± 6.59

90.00 ± 8.72

0.363

T2

109.55 ± 8.94

100.15 ± 10.85*

0.005

T3

89.60 ± 10.24

90.40 ± 5.97

0.764

T4

109.25 ± 7.85

98.90 ± 5.83*

0.000

T5

103.30 ± 8.18

97.90 ± 7.95*

0.041

T6

89.40 ± 8.46

92.85 ± 8.15

0.197

HR/bpm

   

T0

92.40 ± 11.34

86.65 ± 8.89

0.082

T1

73.35 ± 8.51

72.75 ± 7.62

0.815

T2

90.00 ± 10.99

79.60 ± 7.61*

0.001

T3

68.00 ± 9.56

69.15 ± 8.01

0.682

T4

83.05 ± 9.85

74.70 ± 7.39*

0.004

T5

82.85 ± 9.45

74.05 ± 6.06*

0.001

T6

71.60 ± 9.55

70.40 ± 5.31

0.626

  1. Data presented as mean ± SD. P<0.05 vs. Sham TEAS group. SD- standard deviation