Skip to main content

Table 3 The effects of plaque level and severity of gingivitis using S. persica-based oral hygiene tools and standard toothbrush on different tooth surfaces

From: Effectiveness of Salvadora persica toothbrush and Salvadora persica chewing stick in plaque and gingivitis control: a randomized control trial

Variables

Timepoint

Groups

p-value*b (buccal surface)

p-value*b (palatal / lingual surface)

MTB

MCS

STB

Buccal

Palatal / Lingual

Buccal

Palatal / Lingual

Buccal

Palatal / Lingual

Plaque Index (Mean ± SD)

T0

0.04 ± .03

0.14 ± .08

0.03 ± .02

0.10 ± .06

0.04 ± .03

0.09 ± .06

MTB vs MCS: 0.824

MTB vs STB: 0.796

MCS vs STB:

0.885

MTB vs MCS: 0.244

MTB vs STB: 0.481

MCS vs STB:

0.633

T1

0.03 ± .02

0.13 ± .08

0.02 ± .02

0.10 ± .05

0.02 ± .02

0.09 ± .05

T2

0.01 ± .02

0.08 ± .05

0.01 ± .01

0.09 ± .03

0.02 ± .02

0.06 ± .05

Mean differenceâ–²

0.03

0.06

0.02

0.01

0.02

0.03

p-value*a

0.504

0.862

0.781

Periodontal Inflamed Surface Area (Mean ± SD)

T0

18.97 ± 13.91

59.76 ± 39.92

14.92 ± 10.04

55.13 ± 39.36

19.80 ± 13.79

49.54 ± 26.54

MTB vs MCS:

0.327

MTB vs STB: 0.719

MCS vs STB: 0.542

MTB vs MCS: 0.486

MTB vs STB: 0.221

MCS vs STB:

0.538

T1

11.49 ± 6.17

36.29 ± 23.85

11.04 ± 6.90

38.72 ± 25.22

7.28 ± 3.88

33.19 ± 21.59

T2

3.89 ± 1.28

14.24 ± 9.65

3.29 ± 0.94

15.10 ± 9.83

5.62 ± 2.46

11.48 ± 6.11

Mean differenceâ–²

15.08

45.52

11.63

40.03

14.18

38.06

p-value*a

0.439

0.046

0.511

  1. â–²T0-T2
  2. *Mixed Model ANOVA
  3. ap-value within groups
  4. bp-value between groups