Skip to main content

Table 4 Visits to healthcare providers and reported helpfulness of the services

From: Use of complementary and integrative health in Finland: a cross-sectional survey

Providers

Visited in the last 12 months (%)

Visited in the last 12 months (n)

Users who found very helpful or somewhat helpful (%)

Mean/median of times visited in 3 months prior to survey (range)

total n = 3244

Women n = 1647

Men n = 1597

weighted (unweighted)

Physician a

64.1

66.4

61.8

2080 (2094)

93.9

1.38/1 (0 to 20)

Chiropractor

2.9

2.4

3.5

95 (91)

90.9

1.38/1 (0 to 10)

Homeopath

1.2

1.0

1.3

38 (32)

92.9

1.42/1 (0 to 5)

Acupuncturist

2.4

2.8

2.1

79 (73)

86.5

1.34/1 (0 to 6)

Phytotherapist

2.2

1.3

3.0

70 (59)

91.6

2.43/1 (0 to 30)

Bone setter

4.4

5.7

3.1

144 (139)

86.7

1.13/1 (0 to 9)

Energy healer

1.0

1.3

0.7

32 (32)

81.7

2.17/1 (0 to 10)

Reflexologist

1.8

2.3

1.2

57 (51)

80.8

1.58/1 (0 to 12)

Aromatherapist

0.9

0.6

1.3

30 (24)

90.9

1.77/2 (0 to 6)

Massage therapist (conventional) a

29.3

35.0

23.4

951 (953)

97.3

1.87/1 (0 to 35)

Massage therapist (other)

5.3

7.1

3.5

172 (170)

90.8

1.61/1 (0 to 10)

Naprapath

1.6

1.8

1.5

53 (49)

80.0

1.44/1 (0 to 8)

Osteopath

4.0

4.4

3.6

130 (120)

86.5

1.08/1 (0 to 7)

Art therapist

0.9

0.7

1.1

29 (21)

80.9

2.40/1 (0 to 9)

Cuppist

0.7

0.2

1.2

23 (17)

75.6

1.41/1 (0 to 4)

Hypnotherapist

0.7

0.1

1.4

24 (17)

83.9

1.34/1 (0 to 3)

TCM practitioner b

0.8

0.7

0.9

27 (23)

78.9

1.45/1 (0 to 4)

Anthroposophic therapist

0.5

0.1

0.9

15 (10)

72.8

2.61/1 (1 to 6)

Ayurvedic practitioner

0.3

0.3

0.4

11 (9)

89.7

2.32/1 (1 to 10)

Other, what?

0.7

1.1

0.4

24 (22)

84.1

1.47/1 (0 to 4)

None mentioned above

20.6

17.6

23.6

667 (670)

  

I do not know/want to say

0.6

0.2

1.0

20 (16)

  
  1. a Not considered CIH in Finland
  2. b TCM Traditional Chinese Medicine