Skip to main content

Table 3 Sources of knowledge or information patients share with naturopathic practitioners

From: Patient-shared knowledge and information in clinical decision-making: an international survey of the perspectives and experiences of naturopathic practitioners

Knowledge or information source

Frequency patients share knowledge or information with naturopathic practitioners (n = 371)a

Naturopathic practitioner perceived importance of patient-provided knowledge and information sources (n = 365)b

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Perspective of living with their condition

1.65 (0.76)

1.40 (0.63)

Personal health history

1.85 (0.96)

1.46 (0.67)

Family health history

2.22 (1.04)

1.82 (0.82)

Conventional medical tests and examinations

2.30 (0.98)

1.66 (0.70)

General internet sources (e.g., blogs, social media)

2.65 (0.99)

3.95 (0.92)

Other health professionals providing care to the patient

2.95 (0.94)

2.16 (0.77)

Functional examinations or tests (e.g., urine/salivary hormone tests, hair mineral analysis, stool analysis)

3.01 (1.13)

2.13 (0.92)

Informal sources (e.g., family and friends)

3.11 (0.97)

3.64 (1.02)

Broadcast media (e.g., TV, radio)

3.48 (0.99)

4.39 (0.84)

Books

3.53 (0.85)

2.70 (0.91)

Patient advocacy or support groups

4.09 (0.77)

3.26 (0.98)

Published journal articles

4.18 (0.75)

2.32 (0.83)

Government agencies

4.20 (0.68)

3.21 (0.97)

Research organisations

4.25 (0.75)

2.50 (0.87)

  1. aFrequency scale: 1 = Always, 5 = Never
  2. bImportance scale: 1 = Extremely Important, 5 = Not at all important