Skip to main content

Table 2 Other indices related to the quality of the RCTs included in this review

From: Trends and quality of randomized controlled trials on acupuncture conducted in Japan by decade from the 1960s to the 2010s: a systematic review

Period

(Decade)

Number of RCTs

Sample size

Informed consent

Ethics approval

Trial registration

Adverse events

mean, median(SD)(min–max)

reported/not mentioned (% reported)

reported/not mentioned(% reported)

reported/not mentioned(% reported)

reported/not mentioned(% reported)

1960s

1

32, 32

(N/A)

(N/A)

0/1

(0%)

0/1

(0%)

0/1

(0%)

0/1

(0%)

1970s

6

22.7, 20

(6.9)

(14–32)

0/6

(0%)

0/6

(0%)

0/6

(0%)

0/6

(0%)

1980s

9

37.4, 39

(14.3)

(20–60)

0/9

(0%)

0/9

(0%)

0/9

(0%)

1/8

(10%)

1990s

5

93.0, 41

(103.0)

(26–272)

2/3

(40%)

0/5

(0%)

0/5

(0%)

0/5

(0%)

2000s

40

36.8, 28

(31.3)

(6–178)

37/3

(93%)

24/16

(60%)

0/40

(0%)

13/27

(33%)

2010s

47

36.1, 22

(41.5)

(7–210)

45/2

(96%)

41/6

(87%)

4/43

(9%)

13/34

(28%)

Total

108

38.3, 29

(40.8)

(6–272)

84/24

(78%)

65/43

(60%)

4/104

(4%)

27/81

(25%)

  1. RCT Randomized controlled trial, SD Standard deviation, N/A Not available