Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Osteopathic empirical research: a bibliometric analysis from 1966 to 2018

Original Submission
22 Aug 2020 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Sep 2020 Author responded Author comments - Chantal Morin
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Sep 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Oct 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
11 Oct 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
9 Nov 2020 Author responded Author comments - Chantal Morin
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Nov 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Nov 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
25 Jan 2021 Author responded Author comments - Chantal Morin
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Jan 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
28 Jan 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
3 Mar 2021 Author responded Author comments - Chantal Morin
Resubmission - Version 5
3 Mar 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 5
18 Mar 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
14 May 2021 Author responded Author comments - Chantal Morin
Resubmission - Version 6
14 May 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 6
27 May 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 May 2021 Author responded Author comments - Chantal Morin
Resubmission - Version 7
28 May 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 7
19 Jun 2021 Author responded Author comments - Chantal Morin
Resubmission - Version 8
19 Jun 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
24 Jun 2021 Editorially accepted
7 Jul 2021 Article published 10.1186/s12906-021-03366-3

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page