Skip to main content

Table 4 MIC and MBC/MFC values of methanolic extract against pathogenic microbes, KMU, 2020

From: Antimicrobial activity of medicinal plants used for urinary tract infections in pastoralist community in Ethiopia

Scientific name MIC/MBCMFC Concentration of extracts in μg/ml on pathogen bacteria and fungi
Gram positive bacteria Gram negative bacteria Fungi
S. aureus E. faecalis E.coli K. pneumoniae C. albicans
ATCC MRSA ATCC MDR ATCC MDR ATCC MDR ATCC Sample
C.englerianum MIC 16.0 16.0 1.0 1.0 64.0 64.0 2.0 2.0 128.0 64.0
MBC/MFC 32.0 32.0 2.0 2.0 128.0 128.0 2.0 2.0 128.0 128.0
E. depauperata MIC 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 128.0 128.0 16.0 16.0 NT 64.0
MBC/MFC 4.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 128.0 128.0 16.0 16.0 NT 128.0
L. adoensis MIC 64.0 32.0 16.0 16.0 64.0 64.0 16.0 16.0 384.0 512.0
MBC/MFC 128.0 128.0 16.0 16.0 64.0 64.0 32.0 32.0 NT NT
D. penninervium MIC 8.0 8.0 8.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 128.0 128.0
MBC/MFC 16.0 16.0 8.0 8.0 16.0 16.0 32.0 32.0 128.0 128.0
R. abyssinicus MIC 16.0 16.0 64.0 64.0 128.0 128.0 16.0 16.0 32.0 16.0
MBC/MFC 32.0 16.0 128.0 128.0 64.0 64.0 32.0 16.0 64.0 32.0
C. pustulatus MIC 64.0 64.0 4.0 4.0 32.0 32.0 8.0 8.0 128.0 256.0
MBC/MFC 64.0 64.0 8.0 8.0 64.0 64.0 16.0 16.0 128.0 NT
Modern drug 0.1Ce ++ 0.1C ++ 0.1C ++ 0.1C ++ 0.3F 0.3F
  1. C = 5 μg ciprofloxacin, Ce Cefoxitin, F = 20 μg ketoconazole, ++ = Growth has been seen, NT Not tested MDR = < 16 mm, ATCC > 21 mm IZ
\