Skip to main content

Table 4 MIC and MBC/MFC values of methanolic extract against pathogenic microbes, KMU, 2020

From: Antimicrobial activity of medicinal plants used for urinary tract infections in pastoralist community in Ethiopia

Scientific name

MIC/MBCMFC

Concentration of extracts in μg/ml on pathogen bacteria and fungi

Gram positive bacteria

Gram negative bacteria

Fungi

S. aureus

E. faecalis

E.coli

K. pneumoniae

C. albicans

ATCC

MRSA

ATCC

MDR

ATCC

MDR

ATCC

MDR

ATCC

Sample

C.englerianum

MIC

16.0

16.0

1.0

1.0

64.0

64.0

2.0

2.0

128.0

64.0

MBC/MFC

32.0

32.0

2.0

2.0

128.0

128.0

2.0

2.0

128.0

128.0

E. depauperata

MIC

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

128.0

128.0

16.0

16.0

NT

64.0

MBC/MFC

4.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

128.0

128.0

16.0

16.0

NT

128.0

L. adoensis

MIC

64.0

32.0

16.0

16.0

64.0

64.0

16.0

16.0

384.0

512.0

MBC/MFC

128.0

128.0

16.0

16.0

64.0

64.0

32.0

32.0

NT

NT

D. penninervium

MIC

8.0

8.0

8.0

16.0

16.0

16.0

16.0

16.0

128.0

128.0

MBC/MFC

16.0

16.0

8.0

8.0

16.0

16.0

32.0

32.0

128.0

128.0

R. abyssinicus

MIC

16.0

16.0

64.0

64.0

128.0

128.0

16.0

16.0

32.0

16.0

MBC/MFC

32.0

16.0

128.0

128.0

64.0

64.0

32.0

16.0

64.0

32.0

C. pustulatus

MIC

64.0

64.0

4.0

4.0

32.0

32.0

8.0

8.0

128.0

256.0

MBC/MFC

64.0

64.0

8.0

8.0

64.0

64.0

16.0

16.0

128.0

NT

Modern drug

0.1Ce

++

0.1C

++

0.1C

++

0.1C

++

0.3F

0.3F

  1. C = 5 μg ciprofloxacin, Ce Cefoxitin, F = 20 μg ketoconazole, ++ = Growth has been seen, NT Not tested MDR = < 16 mm, ATCC > 21 mm IZ