Peer Review reports
From: Practitioners’ perspectives on evaluating treatment outcomes in traditional Chinese medicine
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sep 2016 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 16 Nov 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Yanhong Zhang |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 16 Nov 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 17 Jan 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kim Arcoleo |
| 3 Feb 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Kerr |
| 3 Mar 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Yanhong Zhang |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 3 Mar 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 12 Mar 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kim Arcoleo |
| 4 Apr 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Yanhong Zhang |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 4 Apr 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 6 Apr 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kim Arcoleo |
| 13 Apr 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Yanhong Zhang |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 13 Apr 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 20 Apr 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
| 18 May 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s12906-017-1746-8 |
You can find further information about peer review here.