Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary data for users (Yes) compared with non-users (No) of complementary medicine for chronic low back pain

From: Chronic low back pain patients’ use of, level of knowledge of and perceived benefits of complementary medicine: a cross-sectional study at an academic pain center

 

Complementary medicine use for chronic low back pain

YES

NO

OR (95% CI)

(p-value)

(N = 126)

(N = 37)

  

Age (mean ± SD)

59 (±16.2)

61 (±16.2)

0.99 (0.96–1.01)

0.41

Sex

 Male

50 (40.3%)

19 (51.4)

ref

 

 Female

74 (59.7%)

18 (48.6)

1.56 (0.74–3.26)

0.24

Origin

 Other

36 (29.5%)

13 (36.1%)

ref

 

 Swiss

86 (70.5%)

23 (63.9%)

1.35 (0.61–2.95)

0.45

Educational level

 Basic/apprenticeship

66 (55.5%)

22 (73.3%)

ref

 

 Professional diploma/high school/college

31 (26%)

2 (6.7%)

5.16 (1.14–23-3)

0.03

 University

22 (18.5%)

2 (20%)

1.22 (0.43–3.4)

0.70

Marital status

 Single

19 (15.2%)

3 (8.8%)

ref

 

 Married/civil partnership

67 (53.6%)

10 (58.8%)

0.50 (0.13–1.87)

0.31

 Divorced/separated

29 (23.2%)

8 (23.6%)

0.57 (0.13–2.43)

0.45

 Widower

10 (8%)

3 (8.8%)

0.32 (0.06–1.6)

0.16

Complementary medicine health insurance

 No

40 (32.5%)

14 (41.2%)

ref

 

 Yes

81 (65.9%)

17 (50%)

2.26 (1.07–4.78)

0.03

 Does not know

2 (1.6%)

3 (8.8%)

  

Pain duration

 1–12 months

14 (11.3%)

9 (24.4%)

ref

 

 1–5 years

48 (38.7%)

14 (37.8%)

2.2 (0.78-6.15)

0.13

 More than 5 years

76 (47.2%)

14 (37.8%)

2.84 (1.02–7.88)

0.04

  1. Associations between explanatory variables and outcomes were assessed using logistic regression model and expressed by the Odds-Ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval and p-value