Skip to main content

Table 1 Groups investigated, demographic, anthropometric and distribution of the sample. Values expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Kruskal Wallis, p = 0.015

From: Comparison of the placebo effect between different non-penetrating acupuncture devices and real acupuncture in healthy subjects: a randomized clinical trial

Group

Acupoint

Age

BMI

Sex

Sex

Subject

  

(years)

(kg/m2)

Fem.(%)

Men.(%)

(n)

Real

St25

24,3 ± 8,8

21,7 ± 2,7

78,25

21,75

23

Park Sham

St25

25,3 ± 5,4

23,8 ± 2,1

52,17

47,83

23

Needle + Foam

St25

26,6 ± 7,8

25,8 ± 3,8

52,17

47,83

23

Insertion and Removal

St25

24,7 ± 7,0

22,5 ± 3,5

86,95

13,05

23

Real + Park Sham

St25

28,3 ± 8,8

24,7 ± 4,7

86,95

13,05

23

Real + Needle and foam

St25

24,3 ± 5,5

23,8 ± 4,2

95,45

4,55

22

Real + insertion and remo.

St25

21,6 ± 3,4

22,9 ± 3,7

82,60

17,4

23

Real

Bl52

24,3 ± 7,1

24,1 ± 6,9

81,81

18,19

22

Park Sham

Bl52

25,1 ± 7,7

23,0 ± 3,9

86,95

13,05

23

Needle + foam

Bl52

29,2 ± 8,0

24,0 ± 5,1

69,56

30,44

23

Insertion and Removal

Bl52

24,6 ± 6,5

22,8 ± 5,7

76

24

25

Real + Park Sham

Bl52

30,8 ± 7,6

23,7 ± 3,1

52,17

47,83

23

Real + Needle and foam

Bl52

27,0 ± 8,3

24,2 ± 4,8

77,27

22,73

22

Real + insertion and remo.

Bl52

25,4 ± 6,7

22,7 ± 3,1

78,26

21,74

23

General:

 

25,8 ± 7,0

23,5 ± 4,1

75,46

24,54

321

P value

   

p = 0.015