Peer Review reports
From: Estimating the accuracy of muscle response testing: two randomised-order blinded studies
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 Nov 2015 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 2 Feb 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Bruno |
| 11 Apr 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Disa Lee Hatfield |
| 5 May 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Anne Jensen |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 5 May 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 18 May 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Bruno |
| 19 Sep 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Anne Jensen |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 19 Sep 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 14 Oct 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Anne Jensen |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 14 Oct 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 18 Oct 2016 | Editorially accepted | |
| 30 Nov 2016 | Article published | 10.1186/s12906-016-1416-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.