Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
27 Feb 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
15 May 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wim Verbeke |
5 Jun 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Harris |
8 Jun 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - James Talcott |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
8 Jun 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
2 Jul 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wim Verbeke |
2 Jul 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Harris |
20 Aug 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - James Talcott |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
20 Aug 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
24 Aug 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Harris |
19 Sep 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wim Verbeke |
16 Oct 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - James Talcott |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
16 Oct 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
17 Oct 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - James Talcott |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
17 Oct 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
29 Oct 2007 | Editorially accepted | |
29 Oct 2007 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-7-32 |
You can find further information about peer review here.