Peer Review reports
From: A systematic review of how homeopathy is represented in conventional and CAM peer reviewed journals
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 15 Mar 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 22 Mar 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Katja Schmidt |
| 25 Apr 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Matko Marusic |
| 7 May 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Timothy Caulfield |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 7 May 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 12 May 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Matko Marusic |
| 25 May 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Timothy Caulfield |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 25 May 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 7 Jun 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Matko Marusic |
| 9 Jun 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Timothy Caulfield |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 9 Jun 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 14 Jun 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
| 14 Jun 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-5-12 |
You can find further information about peer review here.