Peer Review reports
From: Synthetic versus natural curcumin: bioequivalence in an in vitro oral mucositis model
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
1 Jun 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
5 Jun 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Christoph Aebi |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
5 Jun 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
21 Jun 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Christoph Aebi |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
21 Jun 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
26 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gaurang Shah |
7 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - preeti desai |
7 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Amita Joshi |
21 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - ciddi Veeresham |
23 Dec 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Christoph Aebi |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
23 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
23 Dec 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Christoph Aebi |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
23 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
9 Jan 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Amita Joshi |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Publishing | ||
30 Jan 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
11 Feb 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-14-53 |
You can find further information about peer review here.