Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
3 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Veronique Verhoeven |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
11 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
5 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Veronique Verhoeven |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
5 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
29 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Veronique Verhoeven |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
29 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
20 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Becker |
29 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - cesare sirtori |
13 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Veronique Verhoeven |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
13 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
15 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Becker |
15 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - cesare sirtori |
2 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Veronique Verhoeven |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
2 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
24 May 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Veronique Verhoeven |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
24 May 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
11 Jun 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Veronique Verhoeven |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
11 Jun 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
13 Jun 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
18 Jul 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-13-178 |
You can find further information about peer review here.