P01.48. Biomechanical responses to the mechanical characteristics of a spinal manipulation: effect of varying segmental contact site
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine volume 12, Article number: P48 (2012)
Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is a common intervention used to treat low-back pain. Some prior investigations report decreased spinal stiffness following SMT; others report no effect. Given that the efficacy of many therapies (e.g. pharmaceuticals, injections) depend on choice of application site and outcome metric (e.g. fasting vs non-fasting blood sugar), potential explanations for mixed SMT results include variability in SMT application site and the method of computing stiffness. Based on these considerations, our goal was to determine the influence of SMT application site and stiffness computation on SMT-induced changes in spinal stiffness.
In an anesthetized cat preparation (n=8), simulated SMT was delivered by a validated mechanical apparatus to the intact lumbar spine at 4 sites: L6 spinous process, left L6 lamina, left L6 mammillary process, and L7 spinous process. To obtain stiffness data, the apparatus slowly displaced the L6 spinous process to 16N; force and displacement were recorded continuously. Three metrics were calculated from the resulting force-displacement curve: Terminal Instantaneous Stiffness (TIS, stiffness at the end point of the curve), k (average stiffness), and Regional Stiffness (RS, average stiffness in each 10% interval of the curve). SMT-induced changes in each metric were determined for each application site using an ANOVA model controlling for SMT presentation order.
SMT applied at the L6 spinous decreased TIS (-0.48N/mm [-0.86, -0.09] upper, lower 95%CI). SMT applied at the L6 lamina also decreased TIS (-0.44N/mm; [-0.82, -0.05]). SMT applied to the L6 spinous increased k (0.44N/mm, [-0.01, 088]). SMT applied at L6 spinous process and L6 lamina decreased RS during some, but not all intervals.
These results suggest that previous reports on SMT’s effect on spinal stiffness may be influenced by the choice of SMT application site and stiffness metric.
About this article
Cite this article
Edgecombe, T., Kawchuk, G., Long, C. et al. P01.48. Biomechanical responses to the mechanical characteristics of a spinal manipulation: effect of varying segmental contact site. BMC Complement Altern Med 12 (Suppl 1), P48 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-S1-P48