Skip to main content

P01.48. Biomechanical responses to the mechanical characteristics of a spinal manipulation: effect of varying segmental contact site

Purpose

Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is a common intervention used to treat low-back pain. Some prior investigations report decreased spinal stiffness following SMT; others report no effect. Given that the efficacy of many therapies (e.g. pharmaceuticals, injections) depend on choice of application site and outcome metric (e.g. fasting vs non-fasting blood sugar), potential explanations for mixed SMT results include variability in SMT application site and the method of computing stiffness. Based on these considerations, our goal was to determine the influence of SMT application site and stiffness computation on SMT-induced changes in spinal stiffness.

Methods

In an anesthetized cat preparation (n=8), simulated SMT was delivered by a validated mechanical apparatus to the intact lumbar spine at 4 sites: L6 spinous process, left L6 lamina, left L6 mammillary process, and L7 spinous process. To obtain stiffness data, the apparatus slowly displaced the L6 spinous process to 16N; force and displacement were recorded continuously. Three metrics were calculated from the resulting force-displacement curve: Terminal Instantaneous Stiffness (TIS, stiffness at the end point of the curve), k (average stiffness), and Regional Stiffness (RS, average stiffness in each 10% interval of the curve). SMT-induced changes in each metric were determined for each application site using an ANOVA model controlling for SMT presentation order.

Results

SMT applied at the L6 spinous decreased TIS (-0.48N/mm [-0.86, -0.09] upper, lower 95%CI). SMT applied at the L6 lamina also decreased TIS (-0.44N/mm; [-0.82, -0.05]). SMT applied to the L6 spinous increased k (0.44N/mm, [-0.01, 088]). SMT applied at L6 spinous process and L6 lamina decreased RS during some, but not all intervals.

Conclusion

These results suggest that previous reports on SMT’s effect on spinal stiffness may be influenced by the choice of SMT application site and stiffness metric.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T Edgecombe.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edgecombe, T., Kawchuk, G., Long, C. et al. P01.48. Biomechanical responses to the mechanical characteristics of a spinal manipulation: effect of varying segmental contact site. BMC Complement Altern Med 12, P48 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-S1-P48

Download citation

Keywords

  • Application Site
  • Average Stiffness
  • Spinal Manipulation
  • Spinal Manipulative Therapy
  • Biomechanical Response