Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 21 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Fan-Rong Liang |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 21 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 21 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Fan-Rong Liang |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 21 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 21 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Fan-Rong Liang |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 21 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 7 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Ostermann |
| 8 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Beth Poindexter |
| 27 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Fan-Rong Liang |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 27 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 10 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Fan-Rong Liang |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 10 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 28 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Fan-Rong Liang |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 28 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| 9 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Fan-Rong Liang |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 9 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 30 May 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 14 Jun 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-12-75 |
You can find further information about peer review here.