Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
6 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
31 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kathi Kemper |
2 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Barbara Stussman |
13 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - paula gardiner |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
11 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Duk-Chul Lee |
17 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Barbara Stussman |
18 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kathi Kemper |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
11 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
5 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Duk-Chul Lee |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
5 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
29 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Duk-Chul Lee |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
29 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
20 Apr 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
20 Apr 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-12-46 |
You can find further information about peer review here.