Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
2 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
2 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Seyed Mohammad Nabavi |
19 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Runner R. T. Majinda |
20 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jean Paul Dzoyem |
26 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nripendranath Mandal |
5 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Narayan Talukdar |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
5 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
6 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Narayan Talukdar |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
6 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
6 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Seyed Mohammad Nabavi |
6 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jean Paul Dzoyem |
15 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nripendranath Mandal |
19 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Narayan Talukdar |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
19 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
30 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Seyed Mohammad Nabavi |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Publishing | ||
3 Apr 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
3 Apr 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-12-30 |
You can find further information about peer review here.