Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
17 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
3 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Edmund Nartey |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
3 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
8 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Edmund Nartey |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
8 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
11 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ilhami Gulcin |
2 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karkala Sreedhara Ranganath Pai |
15 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Edmund Nartey |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
15 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
16 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ilhami Gulcin |
19 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karkala Sreedhara Ranganath Pai |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Publishing | ||
7 Dec 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
10 Dec 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-12-247 |
You can find further information about peer review here.