Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 3 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Edmund Nartey |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 3 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 8 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Edmund Nartey |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 8 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 11 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ilhami Gulcin |
| 2 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karkala Sreedhara Ranganath Pai |
| 15 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Edmund Nartey |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 15 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 16 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ilhami Gulcin |
| 19 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karkala Sreedhara Ranganath Pai |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 7 Dec 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 10 Dec 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-12-247 |
You can find further information about peer review here.