Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 6 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Nahin |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 6 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 1 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dan Cherkin |
| 4 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ronny Bell |
| 30 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Nahin |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 30 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 14 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dan Cherkin |
| 23 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ronny Bell |
| 3 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Nahin |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 3 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 11 Oct 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 22 Oct 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-12-193 |
You can find further information about peer review here.