Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
20 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
10 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Yuzo Nakagawa-Yagi |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
10 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 10 | |
Resubmission - Version 11 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 11 | |
13 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elizaveta Benevolenskaya |
23 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Julie Secombe |
3 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Yuzo Nakagawa-Yagi |
Resubmission - Version 12 | ||
3 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 12 |
15 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Julie Secombe |
Resubmission - Version 13 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 13 | |
Publishing | ||
8 Jul 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
18 Jul 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-12-101 |
You can find further information about peer review here.