Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Any difference? Use of a CAM provider among cancer patients, coronary heart disease (CHD) patients and individuals with no cancer/CHD

Original Submission
5 Apr 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Agnete Egilsdatter Kristoffersen
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fuschia M. Sirois
21 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alex Molassiotis
31 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Judith Fouladbakhsh
6 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kathleen Wesa
8 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Agnete Egilsdatter Kristoffersen
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Agnete Egilsdatter Kristoffersen
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
7 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kathleen Wesa
10 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fuschia M. Sirois
28 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Agnete Egilsdatter Kristoffersen
Resubmission - Version 5
28 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
22 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fuschia M. Sirois
19 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Agnete Egilsdatter Kristoffersen
Resubmission - Version 6
19 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
10 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Agnete Egilsdatter Kristoffersen
Resubmission - Version 10
10 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
12 Jan 2012 Editorially accepted
12 Jan 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6882-12-1

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page