Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
23 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
27 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Margarete Focke |
22 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Ritz |
13 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Markus A. Rose |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
13 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
10 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Margarete Focke |
8 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Neil Thomson |
4 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Markus A. Rose |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
4 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
31 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Markus A. Rose |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
31 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
1 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Markus A. Rose |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
1 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
3 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
3 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-11-45 |
You can find further information about peer review here.