Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
22 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Hudson |
4 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - mary ann lila |
8 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ladislav Kokoska |
20 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Torsten Hain |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
20 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
29 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - mary ann lila |
6 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ladislav Kokoska |
12 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Torsten Hain |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
12 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
28 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Torsten Hain |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
28 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
4 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Torsten Hain |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
4 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
22 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Torsten Hain |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
22 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
25 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
25 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-11-16 |
You can find further information about peer review here.