Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 6 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pandima Devi Kasi |
| 7 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ulrike Lindequist |
| 14 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cesar Catalan |
| 5 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Rajinder Gupta |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 5 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 7 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cesar Catalan |
| 18 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ulrike Lindequist |
| 25 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pandima Devi Kasi |
| 27 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Rajinder Gupta |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 27 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 15 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Rajinder Gupta |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 15 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 17 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 17 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-11-13 |
You can find further information about peer review here.