Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 28 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Lacey |
| 1 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marlene Kramer |
| 11 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Ostermann |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 11 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 27 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marlene Kramer |
| 1 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Ostermann |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 1 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 9 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Ostermann |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 9 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 4 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Ostermann |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 4 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 9 Mar 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 9 Mar 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-10-10 |
You can find further information about peer review here.